• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
'i : " I . '" '''. ': : l ' {~
l
F R K
I
I
t~
J
~
/
" '.\u00ad
IN T H E D IS T R IC T C O U R T O F S H A W N E EC
O
U
N
m
~
S
!
A
$
C O U R T
T H IR DJ
U
D
i
.
C
r
A
~
D IS T .
D IV IS IO NT H IR T E E N
~
' " !'. ,.."
1 \
t \~
tU tt.n M ,,
;,..
ZOOqH f\R
I 8
P
2 :I \
In the M attero f th e M arriage of:
) \ue000
) \ue000
H A LR IC H A R D S O N ,
) \ue000
P e titio n e r,
) \ue000
) \ue000
v s.
)
C ase N o.
96 D
0 0 2 1 7
) \ue000
C L A U D IN E D O M B R O W S K I,
) \ue000
R espondent.
) \ue000
) \ue000
O R D E R
N owo n th is1 7
th
d a yo f M a rc h , 2 0 0 9 , th e a b o v e -c a p tio n e d m a tte r c o m e s b e fo re th e C o u rt,
T h e p e titio n e r a p p e a rsi n person and by counsel D onald H offm an. T he respondent does not appear.
T h e re u p o n th e C o u rt ta k e s u p th e re s p o n d e n t's m o tio n fo r re c u sa l.
T h e C o u r t fin d s th a t
p u rs u a n tt o K S .A .2 0 -3 1 1 dth e m o tio n w a s im p ro p e rly file d b u t a fte r re v ie w
a n d c o n s id e ra tio n
denies the m otion for recusal.
I frespondent w ishest o proceed w ith her m otion for recusal, she can
p r o c e e d a s o u tlin e d in K S .A . 2 0 -3 1 1 d (b ).

T h e C o u r t fin d s th e respondent w as personally served w ith the M otion and O rdert o A ppear a n d S h o w C a u s e fo r C o n te m p t, s c h e d u le d fo r A p ril6 , 2 0 0 9 a t 1 :3 0 p .m ., p u r s u a n tt o K S .A . 6 0 \u00ad 3 0 3 (d )(4 ).

T h e C o u r t a p p o in ts K e v in C o o k , a m e m b e ro fthe baro f the Stateo f K ansas, as counsel
o frecordt o appear on behalfo f respondenti n all stageso f the C ontem pt proceedings herein.
The Courtconsiders and deniesth e r e s p o n d e n t's m o tio n file do n D e c e m b e r 2 9 , 2 0 0 8 e n title d
" E x p e d ite d
Judicial Process", respondent's m otion
#
8 1
e n title d
" M o tio nF o r C o u rtT o
B eI n
C o m p lia n c e W ith C u rre n t F e d e ra l, S ta te a n d K a n s a s A p p e lla te
R u lin g sI n T hat T he L astO f O rder
1 \ue000
~
~
~
O fT h is C o u r t (D e c e m b e r 1 6 , 2 0 0 8 ) IsI n D ire c t V io la tio n O fA nd D em ands T he C ourt T o C orrect

I ts m e g a l R u lin g Im m e d ia te ly A n d T a k e A n y A ll F u r th e r S te p s T oB e In C o m p lia n c e W ith T h e C u rre n t L a w s S e tfo rth " , m o tio n #8 3e n title d " M o tio n s fo r O r d e r s o fJ u s tic e " , a n d m o tio n #8 5 w h ic h is entitled the sam e as m otion num ber 81.

T h e C o u rt fin d s th a t n o n eo fth e re s p o n d e n t's m o tio n allege any new inform ation o r any legal basis for overturning the C o u rt's decisiono fD ecem ber 16, 2 0 0 8 o r o ffe r a n y b a s is fo r g ra n tin g a n e w tria l o r h e a rin g p u rs u a n tt o K .S .A

6 0 -2 5 9 .
IT IS SO
O R D E R E D .
D lv IJ5 7 B . D E B E N H A M
D IS T R IC T C O U R T JU D G E
2 \ue000
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...