Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Wyndham Hotels REply115-Main

Wyndham Hotels REply115-Main

Ratings: (0)|Views: 154|Likes:
Published by Bennet Kelley
Wyndham Reply Brief
Wyndham Reply Brief

More info:

Published by: Bennet Kelley on Jul 17, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/21/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Jennifer A. Hradil, Esq.Justin T. Quinn, Esq.G
IBBONS
P.C.One Gateway Center  Newark, NJ 07102-5310(973) 596-4500Eugene F. Assaf, P.C., DC Bar 449778
 Pro Hac Vice
 
K. Winn Allen, DC Bar 1000590
 Pro Hac Vice
IRKLAND
&
 
E
LLIS
, LLP655 Fifteenth St. N.W.Washington, D.C. 20005(202) 879-5078eugene.assaf@kirkland.comwinn.allen@kirkland.comDouglas H. Meal, MA Bar 340971
 Pro Hac Vice
OPES
&
 
G
RAY
, LLPPrudential Tower, 800 Boylston StreetBoston, MA 02199-3600(617) 951-7517douglas.meal@ropesgray.com
 Attorneys for Defendants
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSIONPlaintiff,v.WYNDHAM WORLDWIDECORPORATION, et al.,Defendants.))))))))))))))Civil Action No.: 2:13-cv-01887-ES-SCM
 REPLY IN SUPPORT OFMOTION TO DISMISS BYDEFENDANT WYNDHAMHOTELS & RESORTS LLCORAL ARGUMENTREQUESTEDMOTION DATE JUNE 17, 2013
Case 2:13-cv-01887-ES-SCM Document 115 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 1253
 
 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1
 
I.
 
THE COUNT II UNFAIRNESS CLAIM MUST BE DISMISSED...................................2
 
A.
 
The FTC’s Unfairness Authority Does Not Extend To Data Security....................2
 
B.
 
The FTC Refuses To Give Fair Notice Of What The Law Requires.......................4
 
C.
 
The FTC Has Not Alleged Substantial, Unavoidable Consumer Injury..................8
 
D.
 
The FTC’s Unfairness Allegations Fail Federal Pleading Requirements..............10
 
II.
 
THE COUNT I DECEPTION CLAIM MUST BE DISMISSED.....................................10
 
Case 2:13-cv-01887-ES-SCM Document 115 Filed 06/10/13 Page 2 of 18 PageID: 1254
 
 ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIESPageCases
 
 Am. Fin. Servs. Ass’n v. FTC 
,767 F.2d 957 (D.C. Cir. 1985)....................................................................................................9
 American Bar Ass’n v. FTC 
,430 F.3d 457 (D.C. Cir. 2005)....................................................................................................2
 Anderson v. Hannaford Brothers Co.
,659 F.3d 151 (1st Cir. 2011).................................................................................................9, 10
 Ashcroft v. Iqbal 
,556 U.S. 662 (2009)..................................................................................................................12
 Beatrice Foods Co. v. FTC 
,540 F.2d 303 (7th Cir. 1976).......................................................................................................7
Caprigilione v. Radisson Hotels Int’l.
,2011 WL 4736310 (D.N.J. 2011)..............................................................................................11
City of Chicago v. Morales
,527 U.S. 41 (1999)......................................................................................................................7
 Dravo Corp. v. OSHRC 
,613 F.2d 1227 (3d Cir. 1980)..................................................................................................5, 7
 Eckler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
,2012 WL 5382218 (S.D. Cal. 2012).........................................................................................11
 Fabi
 
Constr. Co. v. Secretary of Labor 
,508 F.3d 1077 (D.C. Cir. 2007)..................................................................................................7
 FCC v. Arlington
,2013 WL 2149789 (S. Ct. 2013).................................................................................................4
 FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
,132 S. Ct. 2307 (2012)................................................................................................................5
 FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
,529 U.S. 120 (2000)....................................................................................................................2
 FTC v. Neovi, Inc.
,604 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 2010).....................................................................................................9
Case 2:13-cv-01887-ES-SCM Document 115 Filed 06/10/13 Page 3 of 18 PageID: 1255

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->