6
The duration of the
result
is everlasting, but the nature and extent of the punishmentitself is a final consumption that is equal to utter destruction, not endless torment. If Malachi’s prophecy has already been fulfilled in past history in a temporal overthrow of Israel’s enemies, it nevertheless has eschatological intimations (“the coming of the great andterrible day of the L
ORD
”) that anticipates and illustrates the final judgment.
7
2 Peter 2:6 And turning the cities of
Sodom and Gomorrha
into
ASHES
condemnedthem with an over-throw, making them
AN ENSAMPLE
unto those that after should liveungodly.Jude 1:7 Even as
Sodom and Gomorrha
, and the cities about them in like manner, givingthemselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for
AN EXAMPLE,suffering the vengeance of ETERNAL FIRE.8
As in the statement of John the Baptist, we see that though the nature of the fire is of an unending quality, i.e. “eternal” (
unquenchable
- Matt. 3:12), the result of the fire isnevertheless final: “ashes.” (
will burn up
- Matt. 3:12). Because of the assumed errors of our traditional interpretation we have persistently read
endless conscious torment
into thesepassages because of the adjective
eternal
modifying the noun
fire
, and have remarkablyfailed to see that the result is clearly pronounced
final
by the end product of the consumptivefire, which is ASHES. The wording is not “eternal
torment
” but “eternal
fire
”- it is not“everlasting
suffering
,” but “everlasting
destruction
”- it is not “unquenchable
chaff
,” but“unquenchable
fire
.” John tells us what we readily should understand – that if a fire cannotbe put out, then what’s in it would certainly burn up, especially
chaff!
Eternal fire turnedSodom and Gomorrah to
ashes
, and Christ will “BURN UP the chaff with UNQUENCHABLEFIRE.”
9
Let it be reiterated that the judgment on Sodom and Gomorrha that destroyed “all theinhabitants” (Genesis 19:24, 25), though temporal and earthly in scope, is asserted to be “an
ensample
unto those that after should live ungodly” and “set forth for an
example
, sufferingthe vengeance of eternal fire.” There is no inference here of eternal torment. The fire iseternal, but ashes are the everlasting result of a complete consumption and totaldestruction. This does not preclude torment (“suffering the vengeance of eternal fire”), nor demand instantaneous extinction, but it does exclude retribution that endlessly torments.
10
Please do not attach some worn-out yet sticky label of an aberrant doctrine or peculiar cult to this view. What is presented here is not the conclusion of a modern sect that has itsown sacred book, special revelation, or exclusive Bible translation. The reasons proposedare not the formulation of a liberal exegete who undermines the inerrancy and authority of Scripture, nor the rumination of a sentimental philosopher who questions the supernatural onthe basis of humanistic rationale. Most of my Christian friends would classify my personalbeliefs as conservative, orthodox, and evangelical (on the new birth, deity of Christ, andinspiration of Scripture, for example). See"About Us."
11
Someone asked, “If people were to think they will
just
burn up, then why would theycare about being a Christian?” The response: “If you were to convince professing Christiansthat they would only burn up anyway, and then they would respond
Just forget about it then
-Do you think they were really Christians to begin with?”
12
John 3:15,16 15 That whosoever believeth in him
should not PERISH, but haveETERNAL LIFE
. 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, thatwhosoever believeth in him
should not PERISH, but have EVERLASTING LIFE.
2
Leave a Comment
Excellent research!