Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Fake Tehelka Charge of SheetTerrorist Ishrat Jahan Case

Fake Tehelka Charge of SheetTerrorist Ishrat Jahan Case

Ratings: (0)|Views: 213 |Likes:
Published by Suresh Nakhua
Fake Charge Sheet of Terrorist Ishrat Jahan Case tweeted and uploaded by Tehelka
Fake Charge Sheet of Terrorist Ishrat Jahan Case tweeted and uploaded by Tehelka

More info:

Published by: Suresh Nakhua on Jul 19, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/20/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
As per the orders passed by the Hon
ble High Court of Gujarat vide its judgement dated 01.12.2011 in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 15981of 2010, in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 9832 of 2010 with SpecialCriminal Application No.1850 of 2009, wherein direction was given to theChairman of SIT to file a fresh FIR with the CBI in consequence of theunanimous conclusion of the SIT that the purported police encounter, asmentioned in the FIR of Ahmedabad City DCB PS I CR No. 8/2004, was notgenuine and accordingly on the basis of the written complaint of Shri R. R.Verma, Chairman of the last SIT formed under orders of the High Court of Gujarat, Central Bureau of Investigation, Special Crime Branch, Mumbairegistered a FIR vide RC BS1/S/2011/0005 on 16.12.2011, and took up theinvestigation. The brief facts of the case is that Ahmedabad City Crime Branch on15.06.2004, registered a case vide Crime No. DCB PS I C.R. No. 8/2004 U/s3(2)(a)(c), 13, 14 of Foreigner Act, U/s 120-B, 121, 121(A), 122, 123, 307,353, 186 of Indian Penal Code, U/s 25(1)(a), 27, 29 of Arms Act, U/s3(1)(a)(b), 3 (2), 3(3), 20, 21 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act and U/s135(1) of the Bombay Police Act, on the basis of complaint of Shri J.G.Parmar, the then PI of Crime Branch, Ahmedabad against the followingpersons : Jishan Johar @ Jaanbaz @ Abdul Gani, R/o. Nar-nanak Kalerbadi,Distt. Gujranwala, Punjab, Pakistan.Amjadali Akbarali Rana @ Salim @ Chandu @ Rajkumar, R/o.Haveli Deewan, Bhalwal, Distt. Sargoda, Punjab, Pakistan Javed, R/o. Puna, Maharashtra andOne unknown female terrorist. That, the Investigating Officer Mrs. Parixita Gurjar, ACP, Mahila PoliceStation, Crime Branch, Ahmedabad on conclusion of the investigation of the
 
 
case, filed the final report against 9 persons before the Special Judge, POTACases, Ahmedabad on Dtd. 08.06.2006. In the said Final Report she hadconcluded that the above mentioned persons were terrorists and theencounter was genuine. The Special Judge of POTA Court did not accept thereport of the IO and passed order on 7
th
July, 2006 mentioning that
“  
investigating officer is directed to further investigate into the matter by virtueof powers of this court u/s 173 (8) of Cr. P.C. read with provisions of Prevention of Terrorism Act and make the persistent and consistent efforts of catching particularly those 3 accused A-6, A-7 & A-8 from the State of J & Kand others too and report to this Court in accordance with law.
” 
 
 Thereafter anapplication on 7.11.06 was filed by DCB PS before the Spl. Judge for POTACases, Ahmedabad and it was prayed to accept
A-Summary
with respect toabsconding accused. That various petitions in the Hon
ble High Court of Gujarat and in the Hon
bleSupreme Court of India were filed. The Hon
ble Gujarat High Court, in Cr.MANo. 9832 of 2010 in Special Criminal Application No. 1850 of 2009 (withCrMA 10621 of 2010) and vide judgement and order dated 24.09.2010,formed a SIT directing it to further investigate the case (DCB PS, AhmedabadCity, I CR No. 8/ 2004). The SIT carried out investigation under thechairmanship of different officers and periodically submitted report onprogress of the investigation. Finally the Hon
ble Gujarat High Court, vide judgement dated 01.12.2011, in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.15981 of 2010, in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 9832 of 2010 withSpecial Criminal Application No.1850 of 2009, directed the Chairman of SITto file a fresh FIR with the CBI in consequence of the unanimous conclusionof the SIT that the purported police encounter, as mentioned in the FIR of Ahmedabad City DCB PS I CR No. 8/2004, was not genuine. That it is stated by Shri RR Verma in his complaint dated 15.12.2011 that thepurported encounter effected by Shri. J.G. Parmar along with 19 other GujaratPolice Officials and other unknown persons as mentioned in the FIR of 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->