You are on page 1of 167

.

J



\ - - I --,
.
1
Code 4105
FfLfb
-
:^ '
7

1U

Z
>
19
1>

1
1b
ZU
Z
ZZ
73
Z6
Z>
`

- .
Z!JAN -4 AM 9: 28 ..
7
;BY - Ba

OEPUPC
's

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVDA


IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE
ZPLLY PFL LLLLLlN
Appellant,
N,
MATT MERLISS
r
Respondent.
II
CV11-0328
7
SUPPLEMENTAL JUSTICE COURT APPEAL PROCEEDINGS
- 1



In the Justice Court of Reno Township, Count of Washoe
State of Nevada
ZCHY BAR COUGH
Appc!!aa Cas. No.: RV 2011-00!708
vs.
MTMRSS
Kcspoadcat,
DepINo.: 2
APPEAL RECEIPT
l.8ubpocnaKcHcaring
2.Ordcrto8howCausc
3.ostionToCoughIn's8ccondNotonToContcstPcrsonaIPropcrty
LicnandlorKcmo!PcrsonaIProc
4.KcrIyn8uorto!NotionlorOrdcroowCausc
5.Kccasco!abiIi
5.Ordcr8hortcnu

mcToAnswcr
7.LcttcrtoJudgccrraza!orZachCon, sq.
8.LcttcrtoJudgcCIonbomZachCou in, sq.
9.lInKcady8anctionNotion-Dcman
.
!orKcmo!Propcrty
xhbit7
10.H:RivcrKock(xhibit)
11.DcnicdlIing (xhibt5)
.
12.LcttcrtoJudc8!cnaa (xhbt4) .
13.LcttcrtoNstancIbomZachCo

Insq. (xhbt3}
1.DsosaIo!PcrsonaIPro

crty (xmbt2]
l5.Adavto!scrvicc (xhbt 1
1. vctonDccisonand !rdcrcccmcr20,2011
l7.Kcgucst!orAudioCopyo!Procccdngs

I8.OrcrKcsoIvnNotontoContcstPcrsonaIPropcrtyLicn
19.LcttcrtoCascyakcr, sq.mZachCougIin, sq.
20. mcrgcncLcttcrtoCourthomZachCouIin, sq.
21.loticco!ntryo!!rdc

.
.



CERTIICATE OF CLERK
hcrcbyccrtq that thc cncIoscd documcntsarcccrticd truc andconcct
copicso!thcorginaIdocumcntsonIcwththcKcnoJi
Datcdthis5thdayOJPPY,Z1Z.
Datcdthis5thdayo! JPPY
`


cCtCc
`
>
k
ll


1
RICHARD G. HILL, ESQ.
2 State BarNo. 596
CE D. BAER, ESQ.
3 State Bar No. 9504
RICHARD G. HILL, CHARTERED
4 652 Forest Street
Reno, Nevada 89509
5
(775
) 348-0888
Attorey for Plaintif

6
7
8
9
IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TOWNSHIP

COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA


10 MATTMERLISS;
11 Plaintif,
12 v.
13 ZCHARY BARKER COUGHLIN;
14 Defendant.
15

. ^
!
!
l
l

Case No.: REV2011-001708
Dept. No. 2
16

NA@H

17 TO: THE STATE OF NEADA SENDS GREETINGS TO:


18 Darlene Sharpe
Dickson Realty - Damonte Branch
19 500 Damonte Ranch Parkway,,#625
Reno, Nevada 89521
. `
20
7
75-850-
7000
21 W COMMAND YOU, that all and singular, business and excuses being set aside,
22 you appeir and attend before a notary public, or some other oficer authorized by law to
23 administer oaths. at the Justice Court of Reno Township, Departmen,t 2, One South Sierra
24 Street, REmo, Nevada. 89501, on Tuesday, the 20th day of December, 2011 at 9:45 a.m.,
2
5
then and there to testif on the part of plaintif Landlord, MATT MERLISS.
26
III
27
III
@
M

M
`
2
8
"j
/
F=IIl^

`
LWMtl
lM - Hlll

1 Failure by any person without adequate excuse t obey a Subpoena serve upon that
2 person may be deemed in contempt"'c)f the Court from which the Subpoena is issued.
3 [Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure Rule
45
(e).]
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dated th /ay of December. L11.
.
`
::. 28
P!|^M
F(O0)
Z

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
.

RULE 45, NEVADA RULES OF CML PROCEDURE, PARTS C & D
(c) PROTECON OF PERSONS SUBJECT T SUBPOENA.
()) A party or an attorey responsible for the issuance and serce of a subpoena shall take
reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subjec to that subpoena.
Te court on behalf of which the subpoena was issued shall enforce this duty and impose upon the
party or attorney in breach of this duty an appropriate sancton, which may include, but i not
limited to, lost earings and a reasonable attorney's fee.
(2){A) A person commanded to produce and permit inspecton and copying of designated
books, papers, document or tangible things, or inspeon of premises need not appear in person
at the place of producton or inspecton unless commanded to appear for depositon, hearing or
trial.
CB) Subject to paragraph (d)(2) of this rule, a person commanded to produce and
permit copying may, within 14 days after service of the subpoena or before the tme within 14 days
after service of the subpoena or before the time speifed for compliance if such time is less than
14 days after service, selVe upon the party or attorey designated in the subpoena written objecton
to inspection or copying of any or aof the deignated materials r of the premises. I objection is
made, the party servi ng the subpoena shall not be enttled to inspect or copy the materials or
inspect th. e premises except pursuant to an order of the court by which the subpoena was issued.
I objecton has been made, the part serng the subpoena may, upon notce to the person
commanded to produce, move at any time for an order to compel prOducton. Such an order to
compel producton shall protect any person who is not a part or an ofcer of a part fom
signifcant expense resultng fom the inspection and copying commanded.
(3)(A) On timely moton, the court by which a subpoena was issued shall quash or modif
the subpoena if it
+
(i) fails to allow reasonable tme for compliance;
(ii) requires a person who i not a part or an ofcer of a party to travel to a
place more than 1U miles fom the place where that person resides, i employed or regularly
transacts business in person, except that such a person may in order to attend ta be commanded
to travel from any such place within the state in which the trial is held, or
(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter and
no exception or waiver applie, or
(v) subjects a person to undue burden.
(B) If a subpoena

(i) requires disclosllre of a trade secret or other condential


, research, development, or commercial informaton, or
+
(ii) requires disclosure of an unretained expert's opinion or
;. infonnation no deSCribing specifc events or occurrences in dispute and resulting from
the expert's study made not at the request of any party, the court may, to protect a
person subject to or afected by the subpoena, quash or modif the subpoena or, if the
_part in whose behalf the subpoena is issued shows a substantial need for the testimony
' .. or material that C ot be oth.erwise met without undue bardship and assures that the
person to whom the subpoena is addressed will be reasonably compensated, the court
may order appearance !r pruction only upon specifed conditions.
(d) DUTIES IN RESPONDING TO
'
SUBPOENA.
_ (:) A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents shall produce them as
they are kept in the usual course of business or shall organize and label them to correspond with
the categories in demand.
.
:; (2) When informaton subject to a subpoena is withheld on a claim that it is privileged
or subject to protection as tial preparaton materials, the claim shall be made expressly and shall
be supported by a descripton or the nature of the documents, communicatons, or things no
produced that is sufcient to enable the demanding party to contest the claims.

k
LWPPlL
HKHRO G MlLL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

RlCHARP G. HIU., ESQ.
5ate B No. 596
CASEY D. BAKR, ESQ.
State Bar No. 9504
RlCHARP G. HILL, CHARTERED
652 Fore&t &eet
Reno, Nevada 89509
(775) 3
48-0888
Attorney for Plaintf

IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TOWNSHIP
COUT OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA
MT MERLISS;

Plaintif,
Case No.: R2011-001708
Dept. No. 2
ZACHARY BARKER COUGHLIN;
Defendant.
ISSION
17 DARLENE SHE hereby admits the service of a 50ocnuHc!curng
18 and chec for witness fees on behalf of herself.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
DATED this day ofOecember, 2011.
DARLENE SHE
Dickson Realt - Damonte Branch
500 Damonte Ranch Parkay, #625
Reno, Nevada 89521
,],[ 28
lOI
rm[It6jW0m

. .
.
l
l Ml
1
2


CERTIFIC OF SICE
Pursuantto NRCP s(), I hereby certif that I am an employee of RlCHRD
3
G. HILL, CHRTERED, and that on the/f'ayof December, 20ll,I deposited for
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
pickup by Reno Carson Messenger Service, in a sealed envelope, a true and correct copy
of the foregoing Subpoena re Hearing to:
Zach Coughlin, Esq.
c/o Silver Dollar Motor Ldge
817 North Virginia Street, Ste.
Reno, Nevada 89501
:,o'I 28
|17}M8<Mt
~ I'9
..
J
Z

1
0

J
J
Z
Z
ZZ
Z
Z
ZD
Z
Z1
Z0
,

IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TOWNSHIP
COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA
AFFIRMATION
Pursuant to NRS 2396.030
The undersigned does hereby affirm that the following,
Sub_oena re hearin_ and Adm1ss10n of Servicc
(Tille of Document)
Filed in Reno Justice Cour case number:
G Document dos not contain the social security number of any person
-OR-
O Document contains the social security number of a person as required by:
o A specific state or federal law, to wit:
(State specific state Or federal law)
or
o For the administration of a public program
-or-
O For an application for a federal or state grant
Date:
1 7
FBm8lK0
H6vt880J0000QZ.ZJJ
(Print Name)
Plaintiff
(Attorey for)
. ^
gr
LW0rr|06
n|cNARo O. H|LL

"
1
RICHARD G. HILL, ESQ.
2 State Bar No. 596
/;?
CASEY D. BAKER, ESQ.
3 State Bar No. 9504
RICHARD G. HILL, CHARTERED
4 652 Forest Street
Reno, Nevada 89509
5
(775) 348-0888
Attorney for Plaintif
6
7
8
9
IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TOWNSHIP
COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA
10 MT MERLISS;
11
12 v.
Plaintif,
13 zACHARY BARKER COUGHLIN;
Defendant.
I
l
?
Case No.: REV2011-00l708
Dept. No. 2
14
15
16
1
7
18
ORDER TO SHOW CUSE
Plaintiff, MT MERLlSS, having moved this cOurt for an order compelling
19 defendant, ZACHARY BARKER COUGHUN, to appear and show cause why he should not
20 be held in contempt of court pursuant to NRS 22.020 and N 22.010(3); the matter
21 having been fully briefed by the parties; the curt being flly apprised in the premises, and
22 good cause appearing.
23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Zachary Barker Coughlin shall appear in
24 Depaent 2 of the above-enttled court at the hour of o'clock_.m. on the
25 day of , 201_, and then and there to show cause, if any, why he should not
26 be held in contempt of court pursuant to NRS 22,020 for his unlawfl reentry onto the real
2
7 III
*.Z.
28
III
D=l^
W (D6j3
gr
LW OFFICE
RICHARD . NlLL
J
RICHARD G. HILL, ESQ.
2 State Bar No. 596
CASEY D. BAKER, ESQ.
3 State Bar No. 9504
RICHA G. HILL, CHARTERED
4 652 Forest Street
Reno, Nevada 89509
(775) 348-0888
Attorney for Plaintif
6
lLt
1 c
l
h Z' |Z
b1LVL 10!!LL
_ ^ )g
r

IN THE JUSTICE eOURT OF RENO TOWNSHIP 7

9
COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA
J0 NMERLISS;

)
)

J
JJ
J2 v.
Plaintif,
Case No.: REV2011-001708
Dept. No. 2
J3 ZACHARY BARKER COUGHLIN;
J4 Defendant.
J ]
J6 OPPOSITION TO COUGHLIN'S SECOND MOTION TO CONEST PERSONAL
J7
J
PROPERTY LIEN AD FOR RETUR OF PERSONAL PROPERTY
Plaintif/Landlord, IT MERLISS, through counsel, RICHARD G. HILL,
'. o
J9 CHARTERED and CASEY D. BAKER, ESQ., opposes the moton to contest personal
20 propert lien fled herein by defendant, ZACHARY COUGHLIN, on December 5, 2011. The
2J motion is,untimely, and an impermissible second attempt to have the court hear a motion
22 he once abandoned, and which has become stale. This opposition is based on the points and
23 authorities below and all papers and pleadings on fle herein.
24
26
26
POINTS AND AUHORITIES
FAcS
Mr. Coughlin was evicted from the proper on November 1, 2011. He fled his
27 frst motion to contest personal proper lien on November 16, 2011. Meriss opposed that
s.:
III
(775) u:::::
Fa(775) >s:u
i
LWl
H|OHAHD G. HlLL
J motion on November 21, 2011. That oppositon is incorporated herein by tis
2 reference. At that time, the court was attempted to set a hearing on Mr. Coughlin's
J motion for November 22,2011, but Mr. Coughlin refsed to cooperate or communicate wt
4 the court'to get that hearing on calendar, despite repeated requests by Merliss' counsel that
he do so. See Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4 to Merliss' November 21, 2011 opposition.
b Due solely to Mr. Coughlin's game-play, te hearing tat the court was
7 attempting to schedule for November 22, 2011 was never placed on te court's calendar,
6 and never happened. Of course, Mr. Coughlin now, predictably, claims that he showed up
9 to court on November 22 prepared to go forward. Whether or not he showed up to court,
10
11
12
13
14
16
1b
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
2
2b
27
Mr. Coughlin knew that the hearing had not been placed on the calendar, and why. By now,
Mr. Coughlin's complete and utter la.ck of veracty in the conduct of these proceedings
should not even need mentioning.
Mr. Coughlin then fled a second motion to contest personal propert lien on
Decembe 5, 2011. Thereafer, the court set a hearing on that motion for Tuesday,
Decembe
r
20, 2011. This paper is fled in opposition to that motion.
LW AD AAYSIS
Coughlin's motion is brought pursuant to NRS 118A.460. Subsection (2) of that
statute provides:
2. dispute relating to the amount of the costs claimed
by the landlord ursuant to paragra
p
h (a) of subsection 1 may be
resolved using the procedure proVded in subsection 7 of NRS
40.253
NRS 18A.460(2)
t .'t
NRS 40.253(7)-(8) provides as follows:
7 The tenant may, upon
p
ayment of the appropriate fees
relatng to the fling and servce of a motion, fle a moton with the
court, on a form provided by the clerk of the court, to dispute the
r
amount of the costs, if any, claimed by the landord pursuant to
NRS 118.207 or n8A.460 for the inventor, moving and storage of
,, 2
// /
(775) 38.888
Fa(775) 38-858
c:
p
ersonal property lef on the premises. The motion must be
led witi 20 days afer tlie summary order for removal
of the tenant or the abandonment of the premises by te
tuDuDt, OFwitin 20 ujsuMuF:
2

1
2
J
4

b
7
8
9
10
11
12
1J
14
1
1b
17
18
19
20
21
22
2J
24
2
2b
27
LW OffiCE
RJCHARD . NLL
,,',, 2
(775)38
FI(775) 38858
(a) The tenant has vacated or been removed fom
te premises; and
)A coy of tose charges has been requested by
or }rovided to te tenant,
whichever is later.
8. Upon the fling of a motion pursuant to subsection 7, the court
shall schedule a heatng on mcmotion. The hearing must be
held wU10 days afer te of the moton. The cour
shall afx the date of the hearing to te motion and order a copy
sered upon the landlord by the sherif, constable or other process
server. At the hearing, the cour may:
.
(a) Determine the costs, if any, claimed by the landlord
pursuant to NRS 118.207 or 118A.460 and any accumulating daily
" costs; and
() Order the release of the tenant's proper upon the
ayment of the charges determined to be due or if no charges are
determined to be due.
NRS 40.253(7)-(8) (emphasis added).
Here, Coughlin fled his frst motion pfsuant to NRS n8A.460 on November
16, 2011. That motion was timely. However, when the court atempted to set the hearing,
Coughlin refsed to cooperate or communicate with the cour to get the hearing on
calendar, despite repeated requests from M.erliss' counsel that he do so. Pa sole and direct

result of Mr. Coughlin's refsa to cooperate with the court to set his ow hearing, that
hearing never happened. The 10 days in which to hold the hearing under NRS 40.253(8)
have no

expired. Mr. Coughlin's motion is stale, and the relief he seeks is now time-
4
barred. ecause he abandoned that motion, it was, efectively, denied. He has not shown
any good reason why he should be given leave to re-fle that motion. See, e.g. Masonry
Tle ContractorsAss'n ofS. Nev. v. Jolley, Urga Wirth, Ltd., 113 Nev. 737, 741, 941 P.2d
486 (1997) ("A district cour may reconsider a previously decided issue if substantially
diferent evidence is subsequently introduced or the decision is clearly erroneou.") Accord,
Neverheless, Mr. Coughlin fled his second motion pursuant to NRS 118A.460
on December 5, 2011. Even though th cort has already set a hearing on the motion, the
t 1
.
motioq should be denied. Mr. Cdughl1nevicted from the proper on November 1,
III
J
LW OFFICE
RICHARD . HlLL
'1
1 2011. He was frst told on that Dr. Merliss was claiming an lien on his propert at te fair
2 rental value of the propert on November 10, 2011. See Exhibit 1 to Exhibit 4 of Merliss'
3 November 21,2011 opposition. Coughlin knew that fgure to be a daily prorated amount of
4 $900.00 per month (or $30.00 per day), because tat was the rent set in the underlying
6 lease he signed. He also confrmed his knowledge of that fgure in his email of November
b 12, 20i1, which he attached to his November 16,2011 motion. In that email, Coughlin says
7 ... they were billing the fll $900 rental value of the proper to the undersigned, even afer
any eviction they sought to enforce ... " ./dditional charges of $1060.00 for securing the
l


9 proper afer Mr. Coughlin was found to be squatting there were not incurred until afer
10 Coughlin was arrested and removed fom the property on November 13, 2011. Therefore,
11 under NRS 40.253(7), Coughlin's motion was due to be fled by no November 30, 2011,
12 twenty ddys afer he was informed of the charges. Coughlin's motion is untimely, and must,
13 be denied.
14 WHEREFOR, plaintif prays that defendant take nothing byway of his moton
16 and that same be denied in its entiret; al for such othr, frher and additional relief as
1b seems just to the Cour in the premises.
17
1
AFFIRTION Pursuat to NR 239B.030
The undersigned does hereby afrm that the preceding document does not
19 contain the social securit number of any person.
A
20 DATED this l" ay f D
:
ember, 2011.
21
22
23
24
26
26
27
..`m
(775) 38.8
FI775) 38-S

4
' ... t, 1
` `
& -
8 1 M
LWOFFICE
RICHARD . HILL
1
2
3
4

6
7

9
10
11
12
13
14
1
16
17
1
19
20
2J
22
23
24
26
26
27
Rax8
(775) 388
Fax(775) 358
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
" Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I hereby certifthat I am an employee of RICHRD G.
HILL, CHARTERD, and tat on the ICay of December, 2011, I deposited in the United
States mail at Reno, Nevada, in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, a true and correct copy
of the foregoing OPPOSITION TO COUGHLIN'S SECOND MOTION TO CONTEST
PERSONA PROPERTY LIEN AND FOR RETUR OF PERSONAL PROPERT to:
,i
Zach Coughlin, Esq.
c/o Silver Dollar Motor Lodge
817 North Virginia Street, Ste. 2
Reno, Nevada 89501
i.
.
gr
LAW OFFICE
RICHARD . HILL
\

1
RICHAD G. HILL, ESQ.
2 State Bar No. 596
CASEY D. BAKER, ESQ.
3 State Bar No. 9504
RICHD G. HILL, CHARTERED
4 652 Forest Street
Reno, Nevada 89509
5 (775) 348-0888
Attorney for Plaintif

|II!
I1 L l | c |Z
b1cY 1U11L!
hL JUb1lLL UUh1
:-BY-
6
7
8
IN THE JUS
T
ICE
'
COURT OF RENO TOWSHIP
COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA
9
10
11
1 2
13
14
15
16
17
MAT'MERLISS;
)
) Case No.: REV2011-001708
Plaintif, )
) Dept. No. 2
v. )
)
ZCHARY BARKER COUGHLIN; )
)
Defendant. )
J
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Plaintif, mJ MERLISS, through counsel, RICHA G. HILL, CHARTERD
18 and CASEY D. BAR, ESQ .. ; rep)iei .sPpo of his motion for order to show cause fled
19 herein. Coughlin has failed to oppose the motion in any real way, and does not dispute that
20 he is in contempt of court. This reply is based on the points and authorities below and all
21 papers qd pleadings on fle herein.
22 POINS AD AUTHORTIES
23 Coughlin was evicted and locked out of the subject propert on November 1,
24 2011. On November 13, 2011, he was discovered living in te basement and was arrested
25 for trespassing. Reference is made to the declaration of Richard G. Hill, Esq. attached to
26 the instant motion at Exhibit 2 for frther factual particulars. Coughlin has not denied
27 these facts. Coughlin is in contempt of court under both NRS 22.020 and NRS 22.010(3).
?:axB
III
(775) 3B-BBB
FI(775)
lW OFFICE
RICHARD G. HILL
1 A. Coughlin's Argumnts Regarding a "Commrcial" Lease are

'. :;.
2 Untimely, Have Been Wived by Him, and are Infrm as a Matter of Both Law
3 and Fact, and he Should be Judicially Estopped From Raising Them.
4 U appears that Ceughlin may have eppesed this metien in his "metien to
5 vacate", iled herein en December 5, 2011. In that paper, he takes te new pesitien the
6 leckeut was impermissible because he had a "cemmercial lease". Fer the ceurt's reference,
7 a true

nd cerrect cepy ef the fully executed lease, which was entered intO evidence at the
8 evictien hearing as Exhibit A, is attached heretO as EXHIBIT 1.
9 First, it is clear that Ceughlin has net read NRS 40.254, the statute upen which
10 his evictien was based. Instead, he is seeking to apply, as law, the general statement in the
11
12
13
14
landlerd/tenant handbeek that summary evictions are net available fer the evictien of
cemmercial tenants fer ether than tE ;nenpayment ef rent. That Han evergeneralizatien
- .
^ `
ef the law, and, in any event,' de net. apply here.
NRS 40. 254specifcaly prevides that summar evictiens are available "when
15 te tenant of a dwelling unit [] is subject to the provsions of chapter uSA of

1 NR em phasis added). Coughlin tries to fecus en calling the lease" cemmercia"instead


17 ef "residential", but that tactic is misguided. That argument is meaningless in light ef the
18 plain language ef the centrelling statute. The preper fecus is en whether er net the lease
19 was subject to NRS Chapter u8A. SO leng as it was, summary evictien was allewed. Net
20 until afer the evictien was cemplete, did Coqghlinmake this argument. Further, Ceughlin
21 has net made any shewing that Chapter u8A did net apply. In fact, threugheut the evictien
22 preceedings, he specifcally argued that it did apply, and the ceurt ruled en tat basis.
23 Ceughlin's twO pesitiens are tetally inconsistent, and he is judicially estepped fem
.
24 changing his defense new. S,ee, trcuse u.Del Webb Cemmunities, 123 Nev. 278, 163 P .3d
2
5
462 (2007), which prevides as fellews:
26 Judicial esteppel applies when the fellewing fve criteria are met:
27

::a:8
///
III
(775) 38888
Fax(775) 3858
2
LW OFFICE
RICHARD . HILL
1
2
3
e
l_
+
(1) the same par has taken two positions; (2) the positons were
taken in ajudcial or quasi-judicial administrative proceeding; (3)
the party was successfl in assering the frst position (i.e. the
tribunal adopted the position or accepted it as true); (4) te two
positions are totally inconsistert; and (5) the frst position was not
taken as a result of ignorance, faud, or mistake.
4 Marcuse at 287.
5 Pset forth above, Coughlin has cearly met all criteria D the judicial estoppel
b test, and he must not be allowed to change his defense now.
7
8
Coughlin's argJerfails
'
fo &everal additional reasons:
First, Coughlin's argument is untimely. Coughlin had two months, two
9 hearings, and countless motions in which raise this argument before his rights in the
10 proper.ere terminated by the court and he was legally locked out. He never did so.
i.

JJ Coughlin cannot be allowed to re-argue the merits of te case now, nearly two months afer
12 he was propery locked out of the proper.
13 Second, Coughlin afrmatively waived any such argument. During the
14 eviction proceedings, Coughlin chose to focus
.
on his trumped-up and fabricated
15 "retaliation" and "habitability" claims under NR 118A.510, 118A.290, 118A.355, and
16 118A.360. He now wants to change his stor and allege that his lease was a "commercial"
J7 lease. Pnoted above, Coughlin has not fgured out that the appropriate inquiry is not on
18 the term "commercial", but 9n GapvlUt of NRS Chapter u8A. Psuch, Coughlin's
=

*
19 argument is misguided, and would not entitle him to any relief even if he had raised it
20 timely. Nevertheless, by choosing his defenses based on NRS Chapter n8A, Coughlin
21 afrmatiyely took the position that the lease was subject to that chapter, and waived any
)
"e
22 argument that it was not. Coughlin cannot be allowed to change his argument now.
23 Marcuse. He chose his position and is bound by it.
24 Even if Coughlin had not afrmatively chosen a contrary position at the hearing
25 on the merits, and had simply failed to raise a particular defense, h would not be permitted
26 to raise that new defense now, or on appeal. See Schuck v. Signatre Fight Support of
27 Nevada, Inc., 126 Nev. (Adv.Op. 42), 245 .3d 542 (Nov. 4, 2010). The Court in Schuck
'".`: < 5tutCUu51OIOW8!
(775) 0000
Fa(775) us::s:
'
Cf
:-
1

`

J
v
l

1
2
3
4
5
6
The problem with these arguments is that Schuck did not make
them when he 9P'od slimry judgment in the district court.
While this court gIves a de novo review to a district court's decision
to grant summary udgment, a de novo standard of review does not
trump te general rule that '[a] point not urged in the trial court,
unless it goes to the jurisdiction of that court, is deemed to have
been waived and wll not be considered on a
p
peal' . ### a district
,!
court is not obligated to wade troug and search te

entire record for some specifc facs wlich migt support


the nonmoving pas claim.
7 Schuck at 544-545 (internal citations omited).
8 Even if Coughlin's current fabricated argument that the lease was" commercial"
9 could somehow be considered jurisdicional,' Coughlin afrmatively waived tat argument
1 0 by choosing his defenses based on NRS Chapter IIP. He never raised the issue, and the
11
12
13
court was not obligated to fnd it and raise it for him. Schuck. Further, even if Coughlin
were running one or more unlicepsd
l
s, inesses out of that property, he still has not shown
how that removes the matea.N, pter IP. In fact, Couglin contnues to
1^ fle motions based on provisions of NR Chapter uSA, incuding the motion
15 that gave rise to the December 20, 2011 hearing, and in which he argues that

16 the leas was "commercial."


17 a factual matter, any assertion that the lease was anything but a residential
18 lease is simply not true. Paragraph 2 of the lease provides that the premises was rented to
19 Coughlin and his girlfriend for "residential purposes only". Th paragraph that Coughlin
20 is relyng on is paragraph 11 of the lease. ,In the executed lease, that paragraph provides in
21
22
23
24
part that the propery "shall be used for a residence and for oter purposes." See EXHIBIT
1. In the event the court is inclined to hear argument on the matter, Merliss will present
evidence at the December 22, 2011 hearing that paragraph II in the original lease
*

.
, ` '
document provided to Coughlintha6pafagraph stated "shall be used for a residence and
25 for no other purpose". Merliss will frher present evidence that Coughlin
26 surreptitiously altered that language before he signed and retured the lease. The court
27 will recallthat Dr. Merliss testifed at the October 25,2011 hearing about other provisio. ns
LW OFFICE
RICHARD . HILL
k?:.::8 Z
(775) 38-88
F " (775) 38-58
III
4
" ~ ~
wWOFFICE
RICHARD . HILL
r
l
1 of the lease that Coughlin had also changed wthout informing Merliss that he had done so.
2 Merliss will also present evidence, trough the testimony of Darlene Sharpe, the real estate
3
agent ho leased the propert to Coughlin for Merliss, that Coughlin never mentioned that
4 he was.a lawyer or that he intended to operate a law practice or any oter business out of
the propert. He also never mentioned any sort of mattress business, which he now claims
6 to have been operatng out of the proper. In fact, the court will see that on his rental
7 application, Coughlin liste4.his ,ePl(elt history a "self employed researcher 1995 to
8 present". The lease was never intended to be, and was not, anying other than
9 a residental lease. To the exent the lease now contains an ambiguity as beteen
1 0 paragrapps 2 and 11, that ambiguit should be construed against Coughlin not only because

11 he created it, but because of the underhanded way in which he tried to sneak that and other
12 changes past Merliss. Anvui, LLC v. G.L. Dragon, 123 Nev. 212, 163 P.3d 405 (2007). In
13 any event, the altered language of paragraph 11 of te lease ("for other purposes") is so
14 broad and so vague that nothing in it could possibly take the lease out of Chapter nSA,
J especially where, as here, the property was obviously intended, and used, as a dwelling unit
16 as referred to by NRS 40.254, and a defned by NRS uSA.oSo. Coughlin is grasping at
17 straws and, quite literaly, continuing to make it up as he goes along.
1S With respect to .r. cug1in; eged matress business, that business license
* : -,
19 has been expired since October 2OO, nerethanthreeyearsbetereceahlineverrented
20 the River Rock propert fom Merliss. Atached hereto as EHIBIT 2 is a true and correct
21
22
copy of a_printout fom the Cit of Reno business licensing department webpage, which
l
shows the expired status of Coughlin's business license for his matress business. The court
23 will also note that the address listed for that defnct and unlicensed business is not the
24 address of the Merliss' proper (121 Rver Rock, Reno, Nevada). Coughlin's claims about
25 this|easebeinanythinetherthanaresiaena|1-aseare nereethis pure fabricaton.
26 Coughlin has already demonstrated a histor of raising an argument in a motion, only to
27 withdraw it at the hearing when confonted with a wtness who will present the truth. Thus,
..?\ Z
III
(775) 3
Fax(775) 38-858
1
2
3
4
5
6
in the interest of mitigating the already s

gering amount of fees and costs that Coughlin


@ \. ." I
has caused Merliss to incur on what should have been a simple eviction, Merliss has not
subpoenaed the City of Reno, but reserves his right to do so in the event the court elects to
entertain, any argument or evidence put forth by Coughlin in support of this fallacy.

CNCLUSION
Coughlin is in contempt of this court. He does not deny it. Instead, he wants
7 to raise untimely, untrue, infrm, and unsupported arguments about some non-existent,
8 unlicensed businesses he may have been illegally operatng out of the property. Coughlin
9 has not ofered any real opposition to the motion, and the court should issue te order to
10 show cause forthwth. Reference is made to the declaration of Casey D. Baker, Esq.,
11 attached hereto as EXHIBIT 3, for authentication of all exhibits. Pform of the proposed
12 order is atached hereto as EXHIBIT q.
.
'0\1 ' .
13 WHERFORE; Merilss ,a,s lor an order of tis court requiring defendant,
14 ZACHARY BAER COUGHLIN, to appear and show cause why he should not be held in
15 contempt of cour under NRS 22.0lO(3) for his resistance to this cour's lawfully entered
)
16 order, anunder NRS 22.020 for his illega reentry onto the subject propert afer eviction;
17 for an order that Coughlin pay Merliss for the costs incurred to secure the propert afer the
J break-in by Coughlin as a condition of his being purged of his contempt of court; and for
19 such other, frher and additional relief as seems just to the Cour in the premises .
. " .
20
21
///
ZZ
///
23
24
25
26

. ;` . ..
- .
The court is asked to recall that at the October 25, 2011 eviction hearing, a
representative fom Energy had only just begun testifng when Mr. CoughHn
withdrew his argument about some retaliatory interruption of his electrical service,
rendering tat testimony unnecessary. The witness was then dismissed afer having
wasted a
p
entire morning on tis matter. The Energy attorney, who had fown up
LW OFFICE
27
fom Lastegas for the hearing, had wasted a trip. It is this tpe of perpetual nonsense
RICHARD G. HILL
Dyloughn, anaUorney,tbatbasOrcedNerhsstOncurtensOtbOusandsOdOarsn
:=a:8
Z
fees and costs in this matter.
(775) 38-888
Fa(775) 38-858
6
LWOFFICE
RICHARD G. HILL
1
2
t
!:
-
>
AFFIRATION Pursuat to NR 239B.030
The undersigned does hereby afrm that the preceding' document does not
3 contain the social securit number of any person.
4 DATED this ' day of December, 2011.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
t "
.
. :

`
bLMKG. HILL, CHTERED
::a:8
(775) 38'888
Fa(775) 38.58
+
` 4
.
i' ; 7
LWOFFICE
RICHR G. ItILL
1
Z
O
R
C

1
1
1Z
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
Z
Z
ZZ
Z
ZR
Z
Z
Z1
] ZU
Ublm
FwII6l>M
I
:
EIBIT NO.
1
2

1
'
`
1
:

1W1W
DESCRPION
Standard Rental Agreement
Cit of Reno Business License Search
Declaration of Casey D. Baker, Esq.
Proposed Order

\
`


~.
.
1
.
:

+

:

`
*
~- `
4 +

PAGES
+
1
2
2

1MMA
,
" 0212412010 10:42 PAl 934 1818
~
W

Ad1D
I.
TM

-('- /_
'
'. '02/%(/2010 10:42 FA 934 1813 e GC Aui

@ 003
D WU MtWWMM W Wwm8LND_ WWP
IgmJbsmv . =fwmv 8 Wp
mwww=uw~
I4. Wl %WW .W-lW6NMW@=WAf0MWWb
wl =-=

I W A 'f$t

#+Miamv-I4mwW B,W .WW


hYGWWMWW*MHW
.
fA mRMI: MWI|imNMqqpmMM0P MMWm
u| P= lMW 4W .
I?- WWwOf 4WCWN}W MdptmWWWnwu
mwmWwWW= MNNu|wWMMW8WwW% @
MWW|Q@qQ P gpmWWWMDHMWWWJADMW
MWWWM
f8. mYMP8W' mmmqnzmwwm|nll1 WBM
whyNm4trWwmmMWWM%WdH m
W NMWOWM## W
9 RGNTVOOWTlOW vW/wmmW
KM|8mM N W8m~w@wW#W
.
$, TWNATOR3A @Nvem&pmWm|wW=4em17=
d fW \m~mlvWrwP @2, wqm MVMP1WMMwq WN kw
wl~qwwmMW N . (MmH118wm
Zf. QN n=o ,e-
7 MAlW&R8r4lWMATT TW wWMMmwt M0m,
09mmWM m T6W% W mW Muamwkm4wMaN
qw . Mw= @amrlWkWVWNW -bMWW
wW9MWWWW TlwiA#p wwM9fMM=w6m
gwm:4flkeOw. ALWmowNl=Qw Mw lwWm=w7
wmpmMwmp 1 M wMW.1fwmWMM Wl0t
mmtMw@ntm .WW y W mwwwWw MWwW OmW
Nw=wqwmq tt .
3 maWoPkMW MW Wqtw=m=JWmW mmWm
rMMWW8WMrgtMWjwMWWWWO Wwmw
Mw#M=WwNUWN9=ww- www==mW
w 4W=lPwbtmWWimbWOwlmc#m=w bWmQMwq
mOwrm.WUHfN1M=mw4|wy0l $WWmm )p
mmqwI|mWW MUNWW Wppmm
NBU 9lW&mU NMW wWmmmw. Wpmw
wI WW lmWWWWmmbww1mmmrmwp
7 OLTM Rmwcyp8M Wmwm~=Mwr%mWm
mN. MWMWN N& W mwMMW Wqm
m|z4M4tmvf W w @ wlmn
lIol!oor. WwgmwzWsa y@W
MO; gW}M@t WW&W1MPWX mmmQm
pmMmW=WP mM WmWkW%MNW#@
w=mm=W qWmWm l_".lw"'IOI",-."a_,,nWIM".
IhWAmWmewf N
2 AWfT$ ofWWmwMW =.I| W z.w&wwNmWW
mwewW|m:omWaWqyP0MWWVW V W@t
mmrllllM.JIO.a_'rl_o"Ro'loy.at"Cd"'loL N
Z

_ j1 HI
'. 02/24/2010 10: 94 A 934 1&18 G AID

100t
0_,, |INWN^Y _
~- ~
#

^~=
""'^
3m3
~~-~+=
02/24/2010 10:43 44 J1
mvm
?!8wk
W.NY WJ
A0IB

KdmNN 6U||mUZCmmmw|qWWw|lem
1WW&g00mV60RQN2!XwR, 67-
T wmtwllmbem vm w0WWW
5mIoW00m,g,@mvawWM N
m,b!=t(w=w=)wdlmx|wtMNm
Wa o.
Rs|dmu:MlmzUca/Cq|mw|@mimmm||st
glmdlypcBM4
@BB0
bAMll X
eno tusmess LIcense <uery

Page 1 of ]
Ba0kkMa|nMe0u
1 6|qcf8eocBus|nessL|ceose6t0h
{Plc0DQ.|tmw.CtckCcwWHwmw% ,
Wm|5MW mWW W 5%.w %40Oua|7I64.
Ir__
06 %6 H A0W l m ,,"1" LIc')1 LiN_ UcSIIIU. M6 W a I$1II1 MUcEfDl1 P8 ^ W
51111
^~
CUG.INS'
M MW
W Z W V 11/1/
1GW
N VM
PM `
LL
7LM)
%
L
X
N1H
P @11I "F ^

M W
I
http:/dashboard.reno.govlenoBusinessLicensesirdPage.aspx?equestForwardin,For... 1211412011
. -
gr 1
RICHARD G. HILL, ESQ.
2 State Bar No. 596
CASEY D. BAKER, ESQ.
3 State Bar No. 9504
'
RICHRD G. HILL, CHARTERED
4 652 Forest Street
Reno, Nevada 89509
5
(775) 348-0888
Attorney for Plaintf
6

7
8
9
IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TOWNSHIP
COUNTYOFWASHOE,STATE OFNEVDA
10 MATTMERUSS;
11
I
12 v.
Plaintif,
Case No.: R2011-001708
Dept. No. 2
13 ZACHARY BARKR COUGHLIN;
Defendant. ",
'

`)
)
DCTIN O CE D.
14
15
16
17 CSEY D. BAKR, ESQ., being frst duly sworn, deposes and under penalty of
1 e perury avers:
19 1. I am a resident of the City of Reno, County of Washoe, State of Nevada,
20 and over 18 years of age. This declaration i based on my personal knowledge, except those
21 matters stated on information and belief, and as to those items I beliee them to b true.
22 Tis declaraton i made i support of plaintifs Rep!nSpportoJ oioa)orOr1erto
23 s|ouCause, and represents my testimony if called on to present same in court.
24 2. ] am an attorney duly licensed as such by the State of Nevada to practice
25 before all courts of this State anq maintan my offi ce at 652 Forest Street, Reno, Nevada.
26 I am also licensed to practce before the United States District Court for the Distict of
27 Nevada.


1 3. My ofce represents the plaintf, Dr. Matthew Merliss, in this matter.
2 4. I have personally reviewed the exhibits to the referenced reply, and each
3 exhibit is a true and correct copy of what it purports to be. .
- .
4
5
. I declare under penalt of perur that the foregoing is true and correct.
5
A IRTION Puruat to NR 239B.030
6 The undersigned does hereby afrm that the preceding document does not
7 contain the social securit number o an
y
Jerson.
. .
8
DATED this J q day ofD"cember, 2011
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
"
" . 2
.
.


EXHIBIT 4
gr
LWll
HlCHO G. MlLL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
RICHARD G. HILL, ESQ.
State Bar No. 596
CASEY D. BAKER, ESQ.
State Bar No. 9504
RICHARD G. HILL, CHARTERED
652 Forest Street
Reno, Nevada 89509
(775) 348-0888
Attorey for Plaintif
IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TOWNSHIP
COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA
10 MATTMERLISS;
l
11
Plaintif,
12 v.
J
J
Case No.: REV2011-001708
Dept. No. 2
13 ZACHARY BARKER COUGHLIN;
I
14
15
16
17
18
Defendant.
ORDER TO SHOW CUSE
Plaintiff, MATT MERLISS, having moved this court for an order compelling
19 defendant, ZACHARY BARKER COUGHLIN, to appear and show cause why he should not
20 be held incontempt of court pursuant to NRS 22.020 and NRS 22.010(
3
); the matter
21 having been fully briefed by the partes; the court being fully apprised in the premise, and
22 good cause appearing,
23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Zachary Barker Coughlin shall appear in
24 Departent 2 of the above-enttled court at the hour of __ o'clock _.m. on the
2
5
day of 201_, and then and there to show c, if any, why he should not
26 be held in contempt of court pursuant to NRS 22.020 for his unlawful reentry onto the real
2
7 lll x
- .
.. ' ,C:. _
=.= 28
lll
(n5l
f.(775)
. .
tJFF

1 propert ocated at 121 River Rock, Reno, Nevada, after having been evicted fom same; and
. , ..
2 pursuant'to NRS 22.010(3) for his disobedience of ti court's lawl eviction order.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this __ day of December, 2011.
JUSTICE OF THE PEACE
. . , ,
"
"
: 26
t776j3.
fa775)
2
1
2

CERTFICTE OF SERVCE

", .
'
j
Pursuant to NRCP (),I hereby certif that I am an employee of RICHARD G,
3 HILL, CHARTERED, and that on thedayofDecember, 2011, I deposited in the United
4 States mil at Reno, Nevada, in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, a tue and correct copy
,
5 of the for' egoing REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER T SHOW CAUSE to:
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
i
!
f

Zach Coughlin, Esq,
cf 0 Silver Dollar Motor Lodge
817 North Virginia Street, Ste. 2
Reno, Nevada 89501
J
', (0 - !
. -!
<.---
gr
LW OFFICE
RICHARD G. HILL
1
RICHARD G. HILL, ESQ.
'. FILED
2 State Bar No. 596
CASEY D. BAKER, ESQ.
3 State Bar No. 9504
RICHARD G. HILL, CHARTERED
4 652 Forest Street
I1 Ll 1
|h |4
Fl
F1
" BY
.
Reno, Nevada 89509
5 (775) 348-0888
Atorneyfor Plaintif
DEPUTY
6
7
8
9
IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TOWNSHIP
COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA
10 MT MERLISS;
1
1
Case No.: REV2011-001708
11 Plaintif,

Dept. No. 2
12 v.
13 ZCHARY BARKER COUGHLIN;
Defendant.
1
: _
1
1
1
J
14
15
16
17
, RQUEST FOR SUBMISSION OF
MOTION FOR ORER TO SHOW CAUSE
The plaintif, MT MERLISS, by and through his attorney of record,
18 RICHARD G. HILL, CHARTERED and CASEY D. BAKER, ESQ., requests that the Motion
19 for Order to Show Cause, fled November 21, 2011, be submited to the Court for a decision.
20
21
AFIRATION Pursuant to NRS 239B.030
The undersigned does hereby afrm tat the preceding document does not
22 contain the social securit number of any person. .
-
8
v
23 DATED this ,q daY 2011.
r
,:
24 .

RICHA G. HILL, C
25
26
27
TERED
?:a" 2 8
(775) 38-888
Fa(775) 38-858
:
.>
. . '. .
LW OFFICE
RICHARD G. HILL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
a:
x
8; 28
(775) 38
Fa
x
(775) 38-858
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Pursuant to NRCP 5(), I hereby certif that I am an employee of RCHRD G.
HILL, CHRTERED,and that on the tqday of December, 2011, I deposited in the United
States 'mail at Reno, Nevada, in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, a true and correct copy
of the foregoing Request for Submission of Moton for Order to Show Cause to:
Zach Coughlin, Esq.
cj 0 Siver Dollar Motor Lodge
817 North Virginia Street, Ste. 2
Reno, Nevada 89501
".
t

1
2

4
O

b
S
J
11
IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF
o
TOWSHIP
M AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

, STATE OF NEVADA
Name:
1Z
Address:
Ntt NezJLe

J
14
JD
J
J
Jb
1S
Z
2J
2Z
2
24
Z
Z
2
2b
Phone:
LanlorfPlainti
vs. CASE
NO
: ^^
+^VQ
Name:
ZOb CouQb11n DEPT. NO: ^ V- t=zz
Address:
Phone:
TenantDefndant
LMMMLMMM l LMMWM
Upon cnsideraton O the Plaintifs L Pare Motion to Shoren TIme to
Answer, and good cause shown,
CoOezcI 7C
T of Z

Or Shon|nyTeIoAnsmr
CW9% Ol &. t= tttxwmYrtI w

`
*
J
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
Z
The time within which Ihe Defndant is ordered 0fle and serve
_
_ an Answr to Ihe Complaint is shorened to days afer
4
personal seric upon the Dendant O a cpy of the
D Summons and Complaint.

1Motion is denied because

S
1U
11
1Z
|l
1
_
DTED JUSTICE OF THE PECE
14
1D
1
1
1
1
Z
Z1
ZZ
Z
_
Z4
ZD
Z
7
Z
By Rule, this M be no less than Jjudicial days. -Judicial Daysn do not include
date of seric, weekends or leal holidays.

c1a1 T=nnt O
0ud
.
OmUhm00Qml0PWf
&

OATO1,211
LWI thcw]hn
+
P
1N. Virginia St.
Reno, NV >J1
tel: J ZZ>J
M. >4> 4Z
ZachCoughlinbotail.com
Nevada No: >J
JcOaWCn,H O wPru55JC,L W QB=.@g
IAMO775-3-6S91, TlS-31S,T15-':S-611S, n5-3s
u.Ww.w^^*''
R+ N 6.C@B1-001708
M6T DB WWDOOD @ MMM
WWWW7D _ WMCAMOM2
CMWWMWW
1I4
TOl :baS96J9cl1b-tb4 Z9ld8-ci 4e]dl
December 17,2011
fro: rachcoghlln
ZCgq.
8I7N.V@atW
W.MW1
7Hpooqtmmu 6
tw967 ''0
Ud I M.MB ATM9J
I!~l ID:4lp . of 4
Dea Chief Justce of the Peace Clifton M0Reno Justce Cour,
noticed that, fmally, mresponse to about my four written notice to you that
leaving the window uit air conditoner in, ure by anythng other Vduct tape
and te slidig windows leverage, was a reipe for burgla so near the Lakemill Lodge,
that you fy, took te window m1out. However, you have alwys and still do fail to
take even basic precaustions ... How about leaing a light or two on? You kow, the look
you lef 121River Rock in kind of shouts out to Uworld "hey everybody, yep, we
boarded Uproperty up Wmtn plywood and nails, but, of co, you can tell there is
lots property inside for you to steal ... heck, why not steal te I, swamp cooler on te
porch, or the expensive television set, or te nice wooden shutters on the front porch (the
3mhave not been stolen, not the one that apparently has) .... oh, and help yourself to
anythng on the back porch behind te gate (one can clearly see tt you did noting to
secure the gate in the back of the house when peering into Uback yard fom Ui
Place Studio Apartments parking lot behind backyard of I21River Rock. want a
written inventory (but, of course, you are stctly forbidden to access any hard drives,
digital media, cameras, videos, etc, both in light of the attpmey client privilege and you
tmimaginable refusal to allow me to access my client files. even V copy the bard drives
if you feel so stongly about your lien on the physical property itself that is te hardware
of a compute or hard drive ... ). !f your statement tat the large television in Uliving
room has been stolen (it is a 2inch television, a Toshiba 2m\.
bt/lwww.hdtvsolutions.comfosbiba6HM1S.ht
0SDD 62HM1PmjeOmnT(62HM1]
W e@ BM-1D;WW. 5B0tY 0va@k W 9W1H;WWmO.1W,9Nm,10b00M ,}aq mh MmwcMN
%,wym14%M4WN 0}f MM mrw pmwmt,0M M7 MW }MM T81W0M] eWQO W |em@
MM 1 LW Iu,ylob1mdmQ1o8Wm[11W4bvmOW M A?0INQQMWW099mU& e)u O|
M0U8ac@m Wtb Wm . MW11,W08@wbcn,ac1WLLy6JJ Vb/. T eMN wgmdttoVNm1&m
M b%
24

Ho
w
aw 3 3
frozi zzthcoa)b1n

3
st
3 d dO asccgrt_ dc@O@

HOwdO@atcnant@mVclhUhc@adasccu@dc@Ost?
l7 D:4pz p. J of 4

What cjandl O @wUctcnag ax@ OrIhc@urt_ dc@OsI?

NustthclandlOrdrctumthcsccurt_ @pst7
W

s `aj `
7

WhcnmustIhclandlOrdrcIumIhc sccurl cggsttOlhctcnam?

W thclan alstOrQ thcsccu@ d$gQty3 thctcna sacs


wththcwa_ nwhchUcsccutt_dc@Ostwasuscd?

Wh @@dlOrd sc c @ OrlOs aOrcclu c


Mmlarge a securit deposit may the landlord of a residetial propert request?
NOmOrcth3mOnths O rcnLN8b11AZ4/[1
May a tenant pot a Bt bod insted of a securit depost?
Ycs,uallparlcsg.1thclandlOrdmcs clamaganstthcbOndthclcnammustbcgVcnan
tcm2cdwr|tcnaccomlngrcccVcd1mUlandlOm.Jhctcnantmaysmda wrltcnrcspOnsc
dspuInganytcmstOthcsurcty1hcsurc[cannOtrcOrIalandlOrd'sclamtOacrcdtrcpOrlng
agcncyunlcssthcsurcg1`zstsucsthctcnanttdObtansa]udgcnt.
Mmdoes a tenant prve that he paid a security deposit?
1hclandlOrd srcgurcdtOdclVcrtOthctcnant,upOnhsrcgucst,asgncdwrttcnrcccptOrthc
sccurlydcpOst[as wcllas1OranyOthcrpaymcnts,ncludngrcnt). N8b11A.Z
What Uthe landlord will not gve the tenant a receipt for te securit deposit?
Jhc|cnantmay rcmsctOmakcrcntpaymcntsuntllhc landlOrdprOVdcsthcrcgucstcdrcccpt.N8S
lJ8A.Z
Must the landlord Wmthe security deposit?
NOtncccssly.JhclandlOrdmaydcductDOmUcsccurtydcpOstsuchamOuntsasncccssarytO:

8cmcdyydNltnthcpaymcntOthcrj

8cpardnagcstOthcprcmscs causcd bythctcnant,Othcrthan"nOmalwcar,"

IaythcrcasOnablccOstsOclcanngthcprcmscs_ N 1bA4Z(2)aud[).`_
~ . & m= - ~ -., ,
What b"normal wear"?
1hcKnddctcnOratOnwhchOccurswthOut ncglgcncc, carclcssncOrabuscOlhcprcmscs.N8b`

l
_
`
.
. ~-
Whe must the landlord Wmthe securit depoit Othe tenant?
1pOnIcrmnatOnOthctcnancybycthcrpartyOrtyrcasOn,ncludngcvc|On,thclandlOrdmust
rchthcdcpOsttOthctcnant, OrprOVdcantcm2cdwrt 1cnaccOmtngshOwnghOwUdcpOslwas
dspOscdO,nOlatcrthan3dayscrdiclcnnnatOn Uctcnancy N8b11AZ4/Z)
What trtbe landlord falls Uret the seurt deposit with 0days or the tenant disagrees
with the way Wwhich the sewrit deposit was used?
(hcIcnantmaysucthclandIOrddrcgucstuptOlwccthcamOmtOthcsccurtydcpOst. Atcnant
whOpadthcrdcpOstbypmchasng asurctybOnd,alcntwhOdsagccswthUwayn whchthc
landlOtduscdthc sccurtydcpOstmayscnda wr0cnrcspOnsctOUcsurcly.thctcnantscndslhs
rcspOnscwthn3daysmcrrcccVngantw2cdwrllcnaccOwtng'OmthclandlOrd,thcsur0Iy U
nOtU rcpOrlthcldlOrd'sclamtOa crcdtrcpOrIng agcncywIhOuIOObtannga]udgmcntaganst
lhctcntL
3/4
TOl .4bJ59639-cl7b-tbtZ-gedB-cf4eJde FIOI: zarkroyk1a
1 \0:4q . 4 0 t

WhatU1helandlordsellsthepropeporlosestm afomlesale?
Asuccessor in interest (including apurchaser at a foreclosure sale) has the same obligations regarding
the security deposi Bthe orig ladlord
Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia bt. +
Reno, NV 89501
leI: 775 229 6737
fax: 949' 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmai1.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
Sincerely,
Zach Cougl, Esq,
J W0 B# 0 W 0 M0t 0bN
A WB WN .MB0 L M 08 N
M|0O0 b0 N NL 98 M0t M( O0O0 | OL A
O0 L b| MN M8L W
@0It ODlSg @DP 0mJ
oy L X UK0 L P& $.
| L ZU2 L wX
1 L 2 1 mU .
2 2 X L 2 N0H;
2 X wX lW
X 0 4L ||| @ PPH
&
4l4
l
l

\]
h\J4
1MJb1LL11Mb1A1 NYAA
AN 1MLN1YWAbM..
KPV `~ ' '
f , v1
.
rw
Matt Merlis
PLAINTIFF
v.
Zachary Barke Couglin
DEFENDANT
STATE DF NEVADA
)
} >$
COUNTY OF WASHOE }
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
lVl File Numb lJ4l
V
1

CASE No
.
REV20IIOOI108
YLbYL
Joba lbcben, being n duly swam, de and says: That afat is. citizen of the United State. over
l8 ym age, not a ptty to the within ct acton. m0V6I in Ihe County of Washoe, State ofNc psonally
the deibed documets upon:
Pc: Z Bake COUihiin
Loction:
a N
121 WWRock Stret Reno, NV 89501
11111011 |mc 4:30PM
Tcdovm(s} mw EVICTION ORDER: FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
ORDER FOR SUMMARY EVICTION; ORDER REQUIR.NG INSPECTION OF REAL PROPERTY
Richard Hill Esq
PO 2551
6S2 Forat Stret
Reno, NV 89505
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN Obefore me mis
:_ _e
.. )
day or 20l
L L J_\ -g
NOTARY PUBLIC in U t0t$0td Ste orNewd.
Counry or W:hoe
MICHAEL HALEV, SHERIFF
g FNNP
I
718r
11 FAHHHOULLVAHD HLNO,NV BD1Z~1 {T75|ZB-1
|
'
|
'

RICH G. HILL
rhINr|mdh||mw.om
C8DBK
cdbaer@rhordhllloUJ.C1
SYS. GALGHR, Lego/ Asb/nl
sgl/oghe@rld!ardhtnow.com
SHRRI L. HIL, Leal hJstont
shJIl@rld!orhllfow.com
^Cm,Le.nl
ImIe/$en@hIlIoUJ.em
ORIGINA BY U.S. N
IozdSzd
K,!w d
FOob251
KenO,Hed 89505
COP EMAL cCuglin@hotail.com
Zchary Coughlin
c/o Silver Dollar Motor Ldge
817 North Vrginia Street, Ste. 2
Reno, Nevada 89501
(7751_
(775) S
UJww.rlchordhUCm .
December 2, 2011
Re: Diosal of personal propert 0at 1B1Rver Roc, Reno,
Nevada
Dear Mr. Coughlin:
This letter is sent to you for all purposes contemplated by NRS 118A.460. A
copy of that statute is enclosed for your reference.
More than 0 day have now eapsed since you were evicted fom the real
property at 121 River Rock, Reno, Nevada. You have filed V redeem your personal
property lef on the premises by paying the reasonable costs of inventory, movng and
storage, as provided in the referenced M,despite te Dr. Merliss' ofers to B0
YV.
to do so. You have faie to bring te matter on for a hearing as provded in that statute;
despite your opportunity to do so.
.
Because you refsed to communicte or cooperatewitbtecourt, tbetmefor
a hearing pursuant t NRS 118A.46o(2) bas now expired, and your Moton to Contest
Personal Propert lien, fled onNovember 16,2011, Vstale. Tsuch, Dr. Merliss is not
under any obUgation to allow juto redeem your personal property, on any conditions.
UEfENUANT8
f
&MM$\
+
Ltter to Zacary Coughlin
Re: Re: Disposal of personal propert lef at :2:River Rock, Reno, Nevada
December 2,2O::
Page 2of
Nevertheles, Dr. Merliss is willing to work wth you so that you can
redeem your propert. The tenns and conditon for you to enter te River Rck propert
and remove your belonging are the same those terms contained B Mr. Hill's email to
you dated November z,2O::,a copy of which is enclose herewith, W the following
changes:
1. The fnal day on which you will be allowe to enter onto the River Rock
propert pursuant to this ofr is Monday, Decembr :g, 2O::. Subject to your fl
compliance with all terms of te ofer, moded herein, your right to enter te propert
will begin at g:OOa.m. on the day of your choosing, and expire at 4:45 p.m. tat same da.
Your access will beresticed to weekdays, only (i.e. MODdaythrough Friday, no weeknds).
This is to acommodate the advance notce required 0you, Mfrth below.
2, Because you have demonstated your inabilit to proceed truthfully and
in good faith, the payment contmplated in paragraph : of Mr. Hill's email must be
delivered to our ofce by MOlatr than 2hours in advance of te date you Wbto ben to
move your belongings. That payment must include payment for the day on which you
propose to move your things. The daily rate set forth in Mr. HiD's emstll applies. In
additon, your payment must incude the $1,O6Oalready incurred to secure the propert
afer your repeated breakins, plus any oter tat may be incuned in tat regard in
the interim, When you let me kow when you wish to remove your propert, I will provide
you with a total.
_. You must also provide, also at least 2bours in advance, proof that you
have adequate manpower and vehicular means to move your goods. That means a verifable
reservation or receipt for a Uhaul or similar vebicle. Given te sheer volume of your
belongings, a pickup tuck will not be considered adequate.
4
. All other terms afMr. Hil's email. enclosed herewith, remain the same.
That includes the signatures of you and your agents. described in that email. Those
'signatures must also be delivered at te same tme your payment and proof of vehicle
arrangement.
If you have not made appropriate arrangement with our ofce, and removed
your things by Monday. December 1g,sO11,Dr. MerIiss will dispose of all personal propert
lef on the premises sometme afer that date. We antcipate that those items wsufcient
value t justif procssing will be sold ata "yardsale"tpepro ng. Tose itemswithout.
sufcient value simply be discarded. Dr. Meriss will likely credit bid on some items.
Letter to Zachary Coughlin
.
Re: Re: Disposal of personal property lef at 121 River Rock, Reno, Nevada
December 2, 2011
Page 2of3
Intbemeandme,youdo@bawgermontogo ontbeRver
grogerty,for@reon.
It uup to you how you wish to proceed. May we please be fom you?
Sincerely.
0
Dc.
- NRS 118A.460
- Email dated November 25. 2011
Cc: Dr. Merliss
.

Printed on: 12/2/2011


NII8A460 Procedure l0rdisposal 0lperonal ptopert abandoned or left on prenses.
.
I.

JAc Iaa0ot0my0tspcsc cl pzIproperty abandone on pbylcmcr tzat ctIckca


.

=Mctcvcucaclthc|caaatwtthcutaWcv`1ctO|aiI|Qa0c1cIIcwagmt:

.
(a]TWt0 shII tcascazb!yptcv|0c lct |hcsalcsrac cl thcpt0pwlctJ0 0zys atmcabM

Dccuca ct|ca0 cftbcgoocdaa0maychzrgcdcolIoctW4onM!cm ac|uaI osolmvmtcty


mow d sI0ragc bclotc tcIwthcprcpw tc mc tcuaat 0 W ct a0thwc0 tcptmvc tgy
.
.
c c prcpcrty w|mumat pOc0

JhcIaa0Icr0 M Itab!c mc tmt cuIy Icr mc Izu0Ict0's acgigcat m


Wtcngh|IU tastcragtmptcprty.
.
{}At tbc cxprabca.cl mJ0daypwlor m0|stc clmc pert a. rever mLu
rcascuIcccsts out 0mc ptotc vaIuc r=IU Ia

ct0mrmctcasctizlom toIccztcc

mmacMc0 |hcuaatmwr|uago|msctm|atccatcspctccfWpt0prtyM14ys bzvc cq0


.
` ratmacbccNW gvcatcttcJbcac0cWbcmIc0tcthtmutattwptcrcat ,aa0|l
ta0cst isvmcwa,tatth ctc'swkcwaad.
-

{c}Vcbcctm:ttbcQ0H0taWmcrprcv|a0hztcr0J0fHlctabaa0cac0vchcI.
2 Aay 0isp0tc tcIahag 1c tbc aWt cl c ccs|sc!am0 by tbc Iaa0lcr0 pwt

tc pztah

{a} c
subschca mj;bcrcscIvc0vsug0ytcptcv|0c0uth0a"cl14.2>J.
.|A00c0tcby\17,1J\A11,j7,\>,\|
WYULWHGCO .
Ind!0dznd1mmtII(I)!I)
9W19Ic?,2J$
CJ..!latI=I1.
Printed from the Official Nevada

Law Library from the



Sou-ce"
Copyight " 2

011

`
`

BK0f._


fmm

Gp:

To

SubJeCt:
cuMesssge--
RJCard H|l|[rhlU@rlchardhUlaw.com]
Frday. NeVember 25,Z011 748
'Casey Bake'; 'Mat MerlJss'
' HERE'STHEDF,
WmWmNB|[mte:th|||Qncmswtem)

8mt.F !@y,Nevemhet25. 2011 7:49


TOcaagh|IaQhems||.eem'

BEKE'7BBDW
^

* * '

J .

H r.Opm

t|ese

atethetermsitaderwmyewhes|eedeatet|e

t|vetteektaerqsnd`mtetaeaaasem
1Oba7e

tedsyea|y.

.
.
.
. .

& +

AmOlEN1ONDON- a1A

1-ud

yu|sdcssh et'steaytetUc||eaees.1teymasthesysh|emmeaaddwea@nle|ota|
bak. .

, . t{t, :hensh,hat:hattem||eamt||a,aadthstmu|atyotume.
.

'
5Cmo:u$1,060 ettheaesstesltstesetatet|eteertysuetyeathreak-|as.
Ae,$oJdsy1eteterae.7edsyut|ey,:hmmesasyeupet<dsys($30 724: $720) TA~$),)o.we
w:tsund

thstenteatesttheI ea.
2esheve uwtakesyeastyearwmtht ,uuwaseyeatbm etutetemaveum yatenth
_ pmm8 oss|h|etoday. Uyeumskereaseash|em ,ressensh|eseeemmedsuenswhemadeteaew,ua
`

mseeess

-0Neftheur|ty|: atsstt|e|emeare to hed stotbeda]


.

;n1.8rEC.F.C\xMEA:TT7BE8OaR0OKIBEWCKPOR0B8ENeANO11aMrERW,

.0D. ORcOMRROM8EDUANYwax.
' .. '4'yU whsveyctewandve|ldeetU neyeatgemserest
: 9.:m:No c etlaadeqasteveb|e!e~a edes|.
.
Yeutyeutsgeau'suthet|ueatehesttheteetqat4:45P,m.
10a71hstesastastyeasadthw heenehyt|attme.

vaqaetteee

ebsektethetoe

wdmgnrsataeueq,

T>udyearsgeatswlnatyeutnamesnd>&dstesteyetUemsl!whthepventamesEFO8Eyeaet
utetheheme
.
\
^__ _

wsG8EOw,xOUYOUR+0

BE8E8YEbRMEM8(B!

IRU,MEMF,lN

AVAC, FROMaNxAABP ,1ROMANYU\bOFAK.A8lHGOU1OFYOUROR


,IErREC ON1BE RROrER1Y IO0axOR1NFU1U8( A 0GYatUpFONF

R
8YOU,REk8ONa!t7,aG8EEIOINDEMNlPU8WOMaNYU0BIO88,C8OKDaMaGE,1N0IUlNG
Y8.

s0:NG

s8IOw,YOUaGREE

7OJOFTFOMOUG

RK1NAE

DT
sGN
'

Hay,your computer 2 laptops, tMt WQpreously placed mse, will be released when your 'compliance withthe
fore,oing has been verifed.
*

:

` `

r|ayor ageement
\
lo teed to'hae the mthere??

. +

.
.
MEmATWOKPRDU.C; ATRE,CL RKETUe-mai may contain !q!|y.
pzveged or confdential inforaton. !fyou B,notthe inteded recipient, ple do not read, c@,Q, or dOthis
cntction \0anyn other than the intened recpient you hae uwUmessage Uerror; please not te
'
stnr anddeete the email messag fom your ym.Thank you.
':
.

oNu>.
.
'

'

'TO''usure cbmplianee with: requirements imposed by the U,we mmyou'that any U.5.federal Wadvice contained m
:.tbis' ooIurcUoi (including'any attachments).i not intended,or writ te to be w,and cannot be us,cd. fr the pup9e
,{)'avoiding penalties underte'Intenal ReVenue Cde OF
'

{),promotng, marketng or mmending to another part jny tl

tdn or matter addre heein.

,
\

Nowfow.i in Umesage.
.
:
'
'ciecked by AVG - w.aQ.cm
. .
V:ersion: 2012.0,1S69/ Vi Database: 2092/4610 " 8Date: 11/11/11 mYDatbase, is out of dat.
J
. Hotml Prit Mese
KL. OutcOnv8t5tOn
From: Zach CoughIin(zachcoughlin@hotmai[.com)
Sent Mon IJMIIJ.IJPM
To: rhill@richardhillaw.com; cdbaker.@rchardhillaw.com; ktancir@washoecounty.us
Dear RC, Ms. Stancil:
Please note that my temporary address ror now is:
Zach Coughlin, Esq.
c/o Silver Dollar Motel
817 N.ViiniaSt, Unit #2
Reno, NV89501
Paelor3
I do have a faxnuber, but! would prefer if you didn't use it because it
is somewhat tied to the computers tat Richard Hill is applying what I
believe to be d unlawful rent distraint to.
I don't really have a reliable tmporary phone number. Richard Hill
refses to give me back my stte issued identifcaton, wallet, cell
phone, keys, etc. (I also need my client files very badly, for their sake
and mine).
Dear Mr. Hill,
Usually courts send some notice in wting about hearings, not have the opposing attorey claim there is
one Dan email, nor allo the opposing attorey UcondiliC' his retur ofsomeone's state issued
identification and or exigent ClEDImaterials and law practce equipment upon the other attoreny
assenting to a waiver of the notice and srvice requirement applicabre t o te matter Wat rules apply
Vprocedural notice requirements in Uc! Nothing in 1C88Iaccording to 1CkkIRule 2, not
much found in NRS or uSa. 1CkC|k8Jforoids the house rule- that you seek to take advantage
of, where they are neither published nor approved by the NV 5Ct.pcsyou ha forbidden me V get
my mail from the propert (and you Hen atempted to get me arrested:and threatened to do so
fO my standing in pubHc place not rally doing much of anything) and the USPS probably has not
processed my change of address yet I need to get qproper, not help you circumvent the procedural
protection of notice and service of hearings. know, you are so uto some people bending f
backards to help yget things done quickly thatyu:get all cabb and tuckered out when you
actually have to role up yor sleeves and do wd just rlax. get yourself ajuicebox and a
lunchable or something, and take it one thing at a time_Jike find a basis for notice for these hearings,
etc.. make sure that it doesn't stem from some unpublished, unapproved by the N. S. Cthouse nJle of
the L,and let go from there. nmmeantme, get some informed consent from your client. because
that Schiff case puts your client in danger of losing his house over a retaliatory refusal to stand behind a
couple hundred bucks of rent deductons he agreed to orto fail to follow the notice of inspection
provisions he agree to in writing

nthe lease Agreement


Ho WlWM @C
@C2D
Again, I have a standing caveat in this case that! will not respond to or refute every baseless allegation
or attempt at recounting facts that you make in writing or otherwise, it would just be too burdensome.
So all your "this email memoralizes, whatever, whatever, you can save.
OCOlgl. Esq.
121 BrcrBock
RDO, WI
1
OBWNCd
Hot|rc*TWpWmw0=mcCouto ?soj
AoI8U.S.C. 2ZWy<=0M0fWqmmw(s}
omy.MyounotmmmmW@mbkfmIWmwmip m}jcu
NbynomcImIyoW6W0mw,mp@p,m
mot8bmW 00 WOcf WWWmdyy.0Mmftc0M|dvntol
Intvnd0d 0nlyJtmmrwl0m(r}my<qUtmt sprvl0d,ottcmywH
r0dttH0rwt|dhdmwqlk0lvlW.qgmWUtmmwmcvnt{t],vMf
m
thctonydlnlpg@ W nmny<rt|=ntn=rWD&&nlnlfom0cn
UccnnnojthrQNnt$@N#mmmqyW&m nMg 0r
orvmtmmdmlpwnt[r}pmUwt r , W WMjcr,om
dertmmc0pmfn=g lyRrp1bymrw=UOOmmm`pwnt[r} `smto
wwronolNnt,wpwt,m0Urppk#I -
~ From: rhill@richardhillaw,com
~ To; zachcoughlin@hotmail,com
) CC: cdbakerrchardhillaw.com
) Subject Our conversation
) Date: Mon,21 Nov 2011 14:23:24-0BOO
~
~ Mr, Coughlin - this confrs our coversaton of a few moment ago.
) You need to call Reno justices OOconfirm that the hearing on your
) motion is on for tomorow.
~ Once you have done that, the hearingls.on calendar, caU me back. we
~ will have a substantive conversation
~
~ want you to set your hearing because you are not going to get everything
~ you want and want you to hav had a hearing.
~ Pa lawr, you know the rules.
~
~ Please proceed responsibly.
>Am,please do not be puttng words in mmouth when we speak.
) choose my words with you as carefully as can
~
~ Rgh
~
~ CONFIDENTIL: ATIORNEYWORK PRODUG; ATIORNEY-CUENT PRlVlEGE
~ This e-mail may contain legally privleged or confidential information.
~ you are not the intended recipient. please- Onot read, copy, use, or
~ disclose this communication to anyone other than the intended recipient If
) you have received this message in error, pfease notify the sender and delete
~ te email message from your system. Thank you.
~
; Hol Pnt Mgc
< Circular 2JNotice.
, To ensure compliance with requirements imposed b the I,we inform you
* that any U.5.fedel tax advce contained in this communication (including
7 any aTachmeDW)is not intended or written to be used, and cannot bused,
~ for the purpose of_V avoidfng penaltes under the mm|Rnue Code or
* v)promLting mareting or recommending Uanother party any transaction
~'or matter addressed herein.
7
Pge3u
*~ + -- * - --

LA1OI6,W1
1:Cr,=
IA?L:T>W
IsRoMmmp|C
7I
Nmbm MWWt 2
Ov=M

817N. Vigii bI.Z


Rcoo,^89501
tel: 7229737
8.949 667 7402
ZzchCouhIo@homaiI.com
NcvzdzNNo: 947
LM
8.N.NmN.Z. Cough RJC Re11.170

= UEFENUANT8

_
-

.
December !6,201
'
87 N.V@ubLW
W.W89$
7d:peuemmUwg
Iw9%7?
LmN~NBNp
Dear Judge Sferaza and Reno Justice Court,
Please find following this letter a copy of Casey Baker, Esq's written
communication to me admitting that the 121River'Rock St. locaton has been'
broken into and that items of my proper (and, likely, my law practice's
clients propert) have been stolen and'''rifled'' through.
cannot imagine how it is that w.Baker and W.Hill can appear before the
court and assert a lien on propert that was stolen, may have been stolen; and
or may have been stolen as a direct result of Baker and Hill's negligence in
simultaneously applying an tmlawful rent distaint disguised as "securing"
the location (a contactor bill for $1,060,which includes a notation that they
bill is, in part for fing "leak in the basement, which is is no way
associated with reasonable "storage; moving, and inventorying costs'') while
also continuing to leave a window unit conditioner mplace, not bolted in
or secured by anything other than' duct tape and the clamping efect of the
sliding window pushed down on it while also continuing to refse to heed my
numerous written wangs (also included below) tat they should, preferably
take the window unit air conditioner out of the window and lock the window,
or at least place a strong stick in between the top of the sill and top of te
sliding window pain that mthe window unit air conditioner.'
1ask that 1be allowed an emergenc inspection of the propert at the least,
that Hill and Baker be required to, fee of charge; provide any inventoring
they have' done so far, comparing before and afer the break in Baker
2
describes d occurring on or around December 12, 2011, or better, yet, gve
me acces to all of my belongings and just hope I forget about aof the
tsgession of a most egegous order that have been perpetated against me
in this matter.
.
bhO0l},
Zach Coughlin, Esq.
3

HomPt Mzgc
1
1Z1 Kv8r KOck
Frm: CtQakef(cdbaker@richardhillaw.com)
ent WOI?/31/II3.53PM
To: zachcoughlin@hotmail.com
Cc 'Richard Hill' (rhili@richardhillaw.com)
W.Coughlin:
Pzgc1D1
The River WOproper mben brokn into. We believe the brek-in U d sometme'on Monday.
Dber 12, ott. There appear to be items missing. incuding the Jin the living room, perhaps a
cmputer morutar, and perbaps some Sequipment. cn't what else. The contents af the
residence appear to have been WcUgh
<providing you with Uinformaton 8a curtes. Temai does Nor cnsttute pen an for
to go to the River 8prop
Case D. Baker, Eq.
0L.Hm,Chartered
652 Forest Seet
Reno, Nevada 89509
Phone: (75) 38-0888
8 (m) 38-0858
): cdbakerd aw.Cm
}mlo@ypvmwwm1f)WmWWtmmpwmm,wwm&kWz
m]m10VMw=I1y0u1aWmvmWmB=f,|Mh0Q'MrNmcWQu
mT WW
;2TlC
0WW00M|8Nm0MuNM00I8MpmW.mBK0hy0V lBhyO.l80<0Bl8M0V>MMv00B\lM
Wakb)ummmwmwm,WbWl0rWQ0l\tj8v000gp0=wm1BKhWKWL0l
(tjphh,m00@0fNM@IomQMU|AB0lmfwmm
M0U8DDN688@6
00n00flng
From: Zch Coughln(zachcoughlin@hotmail.com)
Sent: Wed IIJ23JII 3.30 PM
To: kstancil@washoecounty.us; stottle@wahoecount.us
Dear Mr. Tunle and MsStancil,
8@6! O !
1 walked into the fling ofce yesterday at 4.bpm, offidal time, and approached the counter to fle a
number of douments and pay a fee. Initially the der tok my documents, but several minutes later Mr.
Sexon came over and grunted out his legal opinion about ReWhitman and Sullivan cses vis a vis
Nevada blade letter law on fling ofce derks duties and told me 10 reave. The derfc refused to even
mark my documents as received Ootherwise validate my attempts to access justice.
UEFENUAN1'8
I :
^
_
Hotail |B Mesge
RE: 121 River Rock
`1n thLouglnlzl.1.1Jj1\11nl.1n
5?\ We12/.l/..J 4J FM
11 .11lt?''.1l'11|lv.1n t\??\'.1l'11Ilv.1njllj1?'.\l'11lv.1n
D?l' M' 8lt?'
Page 1 of2
1'1t? 1/ 1? 1'11?'/ '?.?\/ l\1 lv /1J 1l1 l11?1 11l'1\j J1 \? '1\ 111' 1\ t?f t?'/
'?.?\/ U\1J\l?/ /1I' .?\ l\1 /1J' B'n 1?J? b\j I1 1n? $J,00 W` $?.J`\j` 1?
1'11?/ 1\ 11 1 c1l'j\j $90!W' 1`lj? 1' v1l .1J1 B \1? l 10t20 11 1'lj? 1?1 \?t?'
1\.? J'1t1\j l\ \t?\1`/ l\1 .1\`1I\j 1 l v'1\jJ l''?`I l\1 1?nl1\ .lJ\j n? l\1 n/
O?\ j'?l 1lnlj? l?1 1 lt? ?t?\ bl. ?1 1 ?.J'? 1? J`11?'/ 1?1? n/ nlt\j
\In?'1J v'?\ '?|J? 1l /1J 11 1 \.J1\j 1I \1 n.?1 1 lt\j 1? 1ln\ w\11v J\ l'
.1\11\?' 1J 1 1? W\11v MC\j 1? 1?vlt 1\ \? 1? 1 1? \1J? W .1? 1 1? 1ln\
Llt?nL11j? 1' ?t?\ JI.\j l '1\j .t \ b?v??\ 1? 111n 1\j v\11v 1l\ l\1 \? 1J 1
1? 1 1'?t?\ 1n?1\? '1n n1/ 1I1\j \ 1? v\11v I\ l' .1\11\?' l\1 1J1\j 1?
v\11v J1 1 jl\ l..? I1?' l 1l\t? 1l vl 1\ 1? 1\j? .'.Il' .1I.1 .?l`/ \ 1?
\1v?' 1?1 \ `1\ 1 1? 11I? P11:1m/ \?`? l'? `?11 1 \l 1n?1\? v\ /1I` m jlt?
1n?1\? l nl'? '1n 1? \t?\1f 1 L1Jj1\ M?n1/ 1ln (a N?tl1l .?\?1 1J\? 1.l?1
l 1? J'11?`/ l\1 l\ ?t1?\t? nl'? 1l1'n \l .?l'/ b??\ 1lnlj?1 l\1 Jl.?1 \ 1? \1v?'
1?1 l v? \ l111\ 1 1\? 1 1? v111?\ 11`.1 1l1? 1?\j '?n1t?1 '1n 1? '1\ 11'.1 Y1J
l1 /1I' .?\ l'? 1 .1J? l1? W' l 1 \
S\.?'?/
Zl.1 L1Jj1\ E.
817 N. Virginia bl. #2
Reno, NV 89501
X.949 6677402
ZachCoughlin@hotail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
P016""Tis message and accompanying document Mcovered b/ the electronic Communications Privacy
A1U.5.C.3131and ma contin confidential infonnation intende ' the specified individual (s)
on/ If you not the intended recipient or an agent reponsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you arc
hereby notifed thai you have received this documen in error and any review, dissemination, copying, or U
ting or any action baed on the contnt ormis InCannation is stictly prohibited. This m.S$! is confidential,
intendt only for the named rKip/fot(s) and may contoin Informotion that is privilegfd, otto.y worl
product or exempt from dlsclowre under applicable law. If you ore not the intend" recipie(t(s), you are
notl/it that any disclosure, copying, distribution any action taken or omitted Dbe takn in rellanc on
U contnts of this Information Is prohibit and my D unlaWl. If yo rf!d this Hin .rror, M
are not (h. nDld cjpient(s), pleQs notif Usend.r, defete tis e-mail from yor computer, and
d.stroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named recipient(s) Is not a
wverojonyOtto..y-clf.nt, wkpoduct, o oth . ofJlicQble Dr/vl.ru.
1'/1.nnl1
P W
Hotail Prt Mesage
'1n! .11lt?`'.1l'1\lV.1n
T1 zl.1.1Ij\ |\11Wl.1n
CC: '1 !`.1l'11lV.1n
5J1?. IIRwK1.t
Dl? W01 19D?. !0JJ 50 0!-0M
M.Coughlin:
Page2 of2
TmRve proper hbeen broken 1|1 We believe the break-in ocsometme on Mond
Dmber ,2DII. Tw80l`t1 be items missing, incuding tht T in the l rom, perhaps a
computer monitor. and perbaps some S% equipment. I1tll what else. The contents of the
mappear to b8v0 been `1? through.
8providing you wdthis informaton l curtesy. Twdoes TLcnsttute person for
you to go to the BwrRo propert.
CcyBaker. Eq.
Richard U.H.U
652 Foret St
Rno, Nevada 89509
Phone: (75)348-0888
: cdbaer@richal w.eom
O:ATKW?M ATY<RWYE
Tott ]O 1@]Nl0f#WM1yWm!Wl mpdomlmpQ,mmW
tcwm:10KM1lyImwmWVhWplMWfw4t1WM
mQ}0u
LK2N
Tom=mw|hmNM 0DlMb]m.mN]0lWU.5.f=w=wmWmm(wq
mJm)irmI0k%Wlll0wW< <WfWpcl{qmdqp mwm1mmRCm
(ip0,WtlIIOfmw@:ompwmormlmd=mM
t . ' Hotai Prnt Mesage
Re: FlUNG READY SANCTON MOTION ATACHED; .
DEMAND FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY
From: Richard Hill(|hill nchamhi!law+co n)
Sent Thu ../!l/.. ! J! FM
To: <zl.1.1:j\\\1nl.1n- (za .:co Ijhl n hot nail+co n
call at 9in the n1`\\j Have your money &your crew ready.
Page 1 0b
Please confirm your representation that you will be removing all of your possessions, and will have them
out of t \e house by b.
No representation, \1 deal!
Sent fIon n/ iPhone probably while diving_
RGH
O\ Nov 24, 20.. at 1.DD PM, Zach Coughlin <zachcoughlin@hotmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Hili,
Though lhave previously be very clear in this regard, lwill do so again in wrltlng
here. lwant all of the propery at 12 River R St. 89501 that belongs to nie.
Immediaely, This Include property both imide, outslde, above, and
within the house. lam not abandoning any of the propery. have made no
indicaion that lhave any intent to do so, despite you attempts at screen writing
In your various hunt and pec emails to me (odd. becuse you usually seem to
have your staff do just about everhing. .. are yhiding something from them,
or from yur client. 1Iie the incedible liabilities yO exposing both to by
geting yur ego involved and obstrucing the protecion of another ICr's
client's rights by applying an unlawful rent distraint). You are nOn to have
an ensive Porsche colleion. one to motch your stone washed jeans. one to
bring out the color of yur eyes, etc., etc. ldon't Inow why some people say
Porches are for a MCrvette Guy" who mpicle up some heavy preensiOns
throughout his private scholing. What does that mean? Anyav, I have a
moving trailer and two other large men in addition to myelf to help me move
my propery and my dient's property. lhove a money order payble to yfor
$750 for what you allege are Mreasonable storage CM. Furher, l have a money
order payable to yfor $1060 for what you allege are contracors charges for
-securng" the propry- (how tha WInto NRS 118A.460's allowance of
reasonable com for storage, moing, and inventor yu have never made .
dear _.One would thlnb suc and ousized -storage charge- O your charging
$900 fr what could fit In a 10XlS storage shed at $100 would Include any
"securingN, however, you apparently feel cmfortable enough In front of Judge
Sferrazza Ueven more oulandish arguments, on top of yrassociate Casey
BoJr, Esq.'s profesional misconduc In atempting to steal $5, the furher
malfeaance demonstrated in submiting a Memorandum of Fes and L
asbing for $0.oo0f( in atoreys fees (despite the preclusive efed of the
previous mmIn Rev20110-o01492 denying the exac carges. date for date
hour for hour that were previously SOUght) based upon a secion of NRS
,

t
f


/
1?J171

` M008 1DMesge @0V0b


applie only to situations where the manufacure of controlled substances was
aUeged and proven (our legal staf did neither). then continuing to argue and
file for attorey's fees despite to constraints of NRS 9.O5Odisallowing such In a
summar eviction proeeding- tha specifically define as distinc withIn JCRCP
Rule 3. Furher. yu have forid me to een get the items oUnite Staes
Postal Mail at the propry (in the mailbox and beynd that are addressed to or
belogn to me. l have filed an Ofidal Chage of Addres with the United States
PostoJ Seric. however. there Is limaly some perio of time that mail w
delivered to 121 River Rocb during which the USPS wen prossing the request. It
is my undentandlng that yu are legally obligated to prere and provide those
mails to me within a reasonable time. Plese either forard them on to me at
the new address that lmproided you with or Infrm me In writing with
respect to how and when lcan obtain what are lihely ver time sensitive
documents related to exigent client matters. Further, y"imtructlon"to have a
-dumpster" ped at the property runs contrar to yur demand tha lnot be
a the propry or on KIn any way under threa of you atempting to hme
arested I do not beliee I am legally obligated Uprocure a "dumpster", If yu
feel that is the case. please confrm that in writing, and provide some legal
support for your contentJon. lblieve lhave demonstrted compliance with all
yur dubious conditions to aI/owing me access to my property Further, I herein
reiterate and apply retroively and prospdlvely Ostaed pracic ono
responding to each and ever allegation you maRe. whether In wrting or
otherwise. whether alleging a civil or criminal violation. any any silence on my
part or lacl of response Is not to be tan os on admission or admowledgment of
whatever assertion or allegations you may hove made against me. Pleed.
you hremained suspiciously silent wlth Moto prouking verifcaion or
deails relQed to yur highly suwed mdubiously time alleations ma oU
pipe and bag of weed" being somewhere on the proper-. Vou Oreminded
that it may be the most Intelligent of assumptions on yur port to assume that
anyhing and everhing done or said at. within. or arund the property Is
capable mbeing monitord and or recorded. am no assering tha that Is the
C, bu meely reminded yu that it Is alway a gassumptlon to male,
especially for someone lihe younelf who tends to get rather -creative- when
facing more than the ty IOCR of opposition shown by so many pro se tenant
litigants. Vour reputaion precedes y@ Mr. Hili. Such dubious Ocpipe and
a bg of weed" asserions on yur port smell of extorion Incident to yur c
Imaginaion and atempts Uarrange for litigaion In Jusice Lto be even
more convenient for yand yfinn than it alredy . Plese respnd in
writing and immediately as this Is an emergenc. Furher, kIs ma 01/ dear
how It was appropriae for the court to retain my $5 as a supersedeos/appeal
bond. but to no grant the stay under NRS 4D.. You have indicaed. several
times. in writing that this is, in yopinion, ma commeral lease. RUstili
yur contention? Additionally, the recent bill for "securing" the property from
ycontrador for MDD(and which yu ar apparently rquiring me to p
prior to allowing maccess to any of my property. even exigent client fle and
law pradlc equipment) mentions stopping a leto the basement. Pleae
explain how that relates In any way to "seuring- the propery or Is a all
alloable under NRS 1MOor an other low. Plese withdraw such a claim
both with the cour ad from wdemand In your -Paragraph #4- that yu are
alleging is requird to be pid prior to yur allowing accss to the property.
Further. please exlain how charges for "s wha Ob salvaged" Is slmllarly
4w Yf mr wW m mm## W v mcm & 6 + M f
httnllhvl4Rw h"114R mlillivf I.nm/mlillPintM"ttIOA un'?I.nitiRQI?440_I"f . llf 1?/17nnll
" Hotail Pt Mesge Pge of b
on lll/llis not redundant or unwarranted given tha the lodn wer changed at
the time of the lo. Basically, k appars yur cntrador and you m
attempting to have the C0rt award yu an unlawful rent distraint of $lDDfor
nailing some plyood boards over the boeR prch scens, whUe. simultaneously,
leaving a ral mof entry to proprty be leaving a window are conditioning
unit In the window on the souh side of the propery fating the street hek in
place by nohing more than the window belntg Owdown on top mkand
mduct tap. You and yur cnc or failed to even wege a stieR or other
item between the window and sill to prevent one from pushing the window air
conditioner unit Inside or outside the house and opening the Vlndow to gain
entr. There no indkaion of the amount of hours or number mworben who
perfnned this wr.alleging it com $lDD.#9. Peroops there exisb some videO
footage showing how many women were there mfor how long. Further, In the
prped Order yur as acer submitted on Lw7.2DB.even Jge
Sferza demonstrated embarrassment and a bof awe a the audacty and
scurrilous characer demonstrated In your offce attemping to define the time at
which the constable could peron the Ioclout to be Mnot later than Odober 3IR,
2DBmthan wha Judge SfemZ a announced fann. the bnc and
subsequently made an Interlineation In the Order reflecting, ,crossing ou -later"
and entering erlier and adding -at 5:DDpm".
Mr. Hill, yur ominous rference to Jordan v. State, in combination with Reno
Police Department Pollee Ocer Carer's statement that yu phim a kof
money and In exchange he will al who
,
yu soy to and do what yu mto, in
conjunction with some other accusation that lwill spare yu and othen a this
time. when viewed with Baler's attempts to steal $ 5from me, your returing
to the Inside of yofce with Sargent Tarter and the other RPD Offcer afer
they told me to leave and tha I would only be afforded avenues of dvll redress
as for as they were concemce, only to see Sargent Tarter pull me over in my
vehlde a short time later. and retaliae against me for asserting my right to.
accss justice without paying a subsaiption fon top myour fagrnt attempts
'to apply unlawful distraint creae the need to Investigate whether yu have
an imperissible connecion Uthe cour. Vour ominous mthinly vened threats
related to citing Jordan v. State and yur other misconduct iovobe
Maintaining The Integrit Of The Profession
Rule 8.4 Misconduct
Uis profeSSional misconduct for a lawyer to:
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or
induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
(b) commit a criminal act that rflects adversely on the lawer's honesty, trustworthiness or
fitness as a lawyer in other respects;
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation;
(d}engage in conduct that is prejudical to the administration of justice;

'. '. . Hobnail YlMesge Page 4 ofS


(e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a goverment agency or official or to
achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law; or
(f knowingly assist judge or judicial offcer in conduct that is a violation of applicable
roles of judicial conduct or other law.M
Please divulge and campaign contributions you have made to Judge Sferrza at anytime in
the last 20 years, any business dealings you have wth Judge Sferraza or other matters
invoked by anything related to the Nevada Code of Judicial Conduc the Rules of
Professional Responsibitit. any any other applicable law.
Your "paratgraph #4M Is Incluced below for yur reference:
"4-you can your possessions out ANVTlME. BUT ONLY ON THE FOLLOWINC
CONOmONS,
a you owe &must pay, In cash, $per day ($900/30" $30)stcrting November
t, 20ft. mstorage. there is no requirement that we move your stuff. yu pid the
dae and py through that date BEFORE you get your RU.LOOK AT THE
STATUTE!
yes. we could p$2.000 to move yur hoard mgoods Into a storage fadlfty.
ho. while the rent might be cheaper, the total would be far more than just
leaving kwhere YOU LEFT IT. we O mitigating your damages. and acually
making Kcheaper for yu to Qyur 9ureleaed the stautor lien.
bbecaus of your rep breaR-lns. which compromised the seurity of the
home, you need to also pU$1.060 Uthe contractor charged to secure the
home and k:contents( yur valuable possessions). tha price does not Indude the
basement door tha was destroyed In the proceu of getting you out when yu
were arrested. but. if you pthe other related cosh, we will recommend that Dr.
Merllss waive the damaged dor.
c yu will NOT be allowed to tabe your compuers &drugs and leave all the
of the mass of junk for U to dean up at the house. yu ned to cooprate.
d you will need to demonstrate the finandal ability and adequate manpower to
get substantially everthing out in one day. wsuggest that mearu a u-haul. or
something Similar. and some manpower to assist. wMAY be willing to allow yu
more time. depending on your deportment. yur sincerity and yur effors. to
date. you have been sorely 1lng on all fronts.
if you want to mahe a proposaL put kin an email &send kboch.
however. please keep it real. yu are not in control-on MQ levels.
5-wthink that you are correct. the justice's court award of csts should be
vacated.
.
we will prepare a stipulation &forard i to yu eledronically. please confnn
that you wiU Sign &retur the original. that would be 0 gstep on the t'd to
Sincerity."
~. ~ . = =
. ^ " MOnIMesge Page 000

Courtoom:
Clerk:
I THE mSTICE COURT OF RENO TOWNSHIP
WASHOE COUNTY, STATE OF NEVADA
EVICTION DECISION A ORDER J"
Motion to Contest Personal Property Lien
W1WwK!OO Landlord
PONPO
PO
Represente : CASEY BAKER, ESQ ..
Ten
ONPO
Tenant
PONPO
Represented by: PRO PER
Date: DECEMER 20, 2011 Time: 10:00 A.M.
ludge: PETER JSFERRAZA
ase Number: REV2011-001708
Department: 2
Hearing Held.
6 Continued To:
o No Appearance
o Under submission.
o Other.
.
DECISION:
M1LIAIL
: .
By signing below, your agents herey release Dr. Matthew Merliss, the
Matthew J. Merliss Living Trust, te law frm of Richard G. Hill, Chartered, Richard G.
Hill, Esq., and Casey D. Baker, Esq., in advance, fom any and all injuries, fom any
source and of any kind" arising out of your or their presence on the property at 1<1 River
Rock, Reno, Nevada, today or in the are) .
You, personally. agree to indemnif the above from any such loss, cost or damage,
including fees.
-,. 1'
. Ft
0">I.
By signing below, you agree to all of the foregoing.
. :
Dated this day of December, L11

ZACHARR COUGHLIN
!

-- l

r
5
1 0
1 5
20
25

! . qf

2
3
4
6
7
8
9
1 1
1 2
1 3
1 4
1 6
1 7
1 8
1 9
2 1
22
23
24
26

FI L E D
I ! JcO l PM 1 2: |5
STEVE TUTTLE
COURT
BY
ouu ry
IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TOWNSHI
COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA
MATTHEW MERLISS,
Plaintiff/Landlord,
vs.
ZACHARY BAER COUGHLIN,
Defendant/Tenant.
Case No. REV 201 1 -001 708
Dept. No. 2
ORDER RSOLVING MOTION TO CONTEST
PERSONAL PROPERTY LIEN
Having considered the evidence presented to this point ad the parties having
agreed to allow the Court to enter an order based on said evidence, the Court fnds that $480. 00
is fair and reasonabl e compensation for storage of the personal property of the Defendant for
the period of November 1 , 201 1 to November 1 6, 201 1 .
Based upon the foregoing, the Court hereby enters the following Order:
1 . That the Defendant, Zachary Coughlin, shall pay the sum of $480.00 in
certifed funds to the Plaintiff at the Law Ofces of Casey Baker on or before Wednesday,
December 2 1 , 201 1 at 4: 00 p.m.
2. The Plaintiff shall have the right to videotape the premises from 9: 00
a.m. to 5 : 00 p. m. on Thursday, December 22, 20 1 1 and said video shall include personal and
real property; however, they shall not identi fy any personal information of any clients of the
-
1
-
Defendat' s law practice. I addition, the Plaintiff, by his attoreys or other authorized
2 representative, shall have the right to videotape the property following the removal by the
3 Defendant of his personal property, which shall occur on or before 5: 00 p. m. on December 23,
4 201 1 . The purose of the video is to determine whether there is any damage to the real or
5 personal property of the Plaintiff, which shall include all fxtures and appliaces that belong to
6 the Plaintiff. I addition, the video shall be used to verify what property, i f any, is lef on the
7 premises by the Defendant.
8 3. Anything and everything lef on the property afer 5: 00 p. m. on Friday,
9 December 23, 201 1 , may be disposed of by the Plaintiff in his sole discretion.
1 0 4. Defendant shall have access to the property fom 9: 00 a.m. to 5:00 p. m.
l I on Thursday, December 22, 201 1 , to videotape, i f he desires, the real and personal property and
1 2 to remove his property from the premises. In addition, the Defendant shall have fom 9: 00 a. m.
1 3 to 5: 00 p.m. on Friday, December 23, 201 1 t o videotape ad remove his property fom the
1 4 premises. Access will be provided by a representative of the landlord, who will unlock the
1 5 property at 9: 00 a.m. and lock the property at 5:00 p. m. on both days.
1 6 5. The Landlord shall have no liability for ay inj uries suffered by
1 7 Defendant or anyone else during said removal process, except for an intentional tort committed
1 8 by the Plaintiff or his representatives against the person of the Defendant and, likewise, the
1 9 Defendant shall have no liability for any injury to the person of the Plaintiff or his agents,
20 except for an intentional tort by the Defendant. Further, anyone the Defendant authorizes to be
2 1 on the premises during the period Thursday, December 2Znd, from 9: 00 a.m. to 5: 00 p. m. and
22 Friday, December 23rd, fom 9: 00 a. m. to 5: 00 p. m. shall sig the Release of Liability, attached
23 hereto as Exhibit A. If any third party is on the premises without signing the waiver, they shall
24 be trespassers and the Plaintiff or his agents can have them removed by law enforcement.
25 6. The Defendant shall not cause any damage to the real property or
26 personal prpery of the Plaintiff located at 1 2 1 River Rock, Reno, Nevada, frm this date
- 2 -
forad. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the issue of any damages caused to the real
2 property or personal property of the landlord during the removal process.
3 7. The Defendant shall have no claim for daages with respect to missing
4 or damaged personal property at 1 21 River Rock, except for property identifed by him, in
5 writing, by 1 1 :00 a.m. on Thursday, December 22, 201 1 by email to Mr. Baker, with a copy to
6 the Court. The Defendant reserves any other claims he has that may not involve his personal
7 property located at the premises to the extent legally allowed by statute or case law.
8 8. The Pl aintiff reserves al l claims of ay nature including, but not limited
9 to, additional storage fees fom November 1 7, 201 1 up until December 23, 201 1 , damages to
1 0 the property allegedly caused by the Defendat, disposal costs of any property lef behind,
1 1
1 2
1 3
1 4
1 5
1 6
1 7
1 8
1 9
20
2 1
22
23
24
25
26
- 3 -

RELEASE OF LIABILITY
By siging below, your agents hereby release Dr. Matthew Merliss, the Matthew J.
Merliss Living Trust, the law fr of Richard G. Hill, Chartered, Richad G. Hill, Esq. , and
Casey D. Baker, Esq., in advance, from any and all injuries, fom any source ad of any kind,
arising out of your or their presence on the property at 1 21 River Rock, Reno, Nevada, today or
in the future (assuming future authorization for same), except those arising out of a intentional
tort by either pay against the other. You, personally, agree to indemnify the above fom any
such loss, cost or damage, including fees.
By signing below, you agree to all of the foregoing.
Dated this day of December, 201 1 .
Exhibit A
5
1 0
1 5
20
25
23

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
3
Lori Townsend, certifies: (a) she is a citizen of the United States, over 1 8 years of
4
age, and not a party to the within action, and (b) that afant served a copy of the attached on the
persons, at the addresses, on the date, ad in the manner indicated below:
14 date had delivered.
date placed in county interofce mail.
date hand delivered.
2 1
date placed in county interofce mail.
6
7
8
9
1 1
Name:
1 2
Address to which
1 3
maileddelivered:
December 21 , 201 1
1 6
December 21 , 201 1
1 7
1 8
Nae:
1 9
Address to which
maileddelivered:
December 21 , 201 1
22
December 21 , 201 1
24
26
LORI TOWNSEND, Secretay to
PETER J. SFERAZZA, Justice of the Peace
Reno Justice Court, Depaent 2
Richad G. Hill, Esq.
Casey D. Baer, Esq.
652 Forest Street
Reno, NV 89509
date placed in comit mailing system for postage
and deposit in U. S. mail.
trasmitted via facsimile to 775-348-0858
Zachary Barker Coughlin, Esq.
8 1 7 North Virginia Street
Reno, NV 89501
date placed iI county mailing system for postage
and deposit in U.S. mail.
transmitted via facsimile to 949-667-7402
'.
1
2
3
4
5
Document Code:
Zach Coughlin
817 N. Virgina St. #2
Reno, N 89501
Tele: 775-229-6737
Fa: 949-667-7402

Pro per DefendatTenatCounterclaimat
6
7
JUSTICE COURT RENO TOWNSHI
WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA
8
9
MATT MRLISS, M, ; MATHW J.
MRLISS LIVING TRUST
10
Plaintif,
vs.
11
12
Z
ACHRY BAER COUGHLIN;
Defendant.
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
GREEN ACTION LAWN SERVICE A ITS
)
14
OWNER NERY R MCAL-CRUZ;
)
15
DAENE SHAPE, REALTOR personally
)
i ad in her capacity as a employee of
)
16
D1CKSON RALTY; DICKSON REALTY;
)
N ENERGY PUBLIC UTIITY
1
7 CORPORATION; NEVAA COURT
SERVICES; JOEL DUEN, individually ad
18
n his capacity as a process server for
19
NEVADA COURT SERVICES.
Real Parties in
2 0
terestnterled Third Parties
21
CASE NO: rev2011-001708
DEPT. NO: 2
Tenants Notice that No Aleement or
Settlement was made or entered into by
Tenant. and that December 21. 2011 Order
of Court was an Order
22
Tenants Notice that No A&reement or Settlenent was made or entered into by Tenant. and tlat
23
December 21. 2011 Order of Cour was an Order
.
24
Te undersigedhereby reserves all rgts to fle motions seeking to Amend, Vacate, Appeal, Set
25
26
2
7
28
Aside or othese challenge this Court's December 21,2011 Order, including, but not limited to, ay
interretation tht ''e paes having agree to alolow te Court to enter a order baed on said
evidence ... ", especially where, Tenat clealy anounced in open court he was not entering into any
114 Tenants Notice thatNo Aleement or Settlement was made or entered into by Tenant. and
that December 21. 2011 Order of Court was an Order
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
agreeing or authorizing an settlement, that he would not sign anything, that he retained all his rights
to appeal or otherwise move to correct, amend, etc. any order that would issue, that he waived none
of this rights, that no new jurisdictional basis or rights no existing under the law presently should be
created by any such Order, etc, and that the order should have a claim preclusion effect with regard to
any further attempts by Merliss, Baker or Hill to recover amounts addressed, by statute by a hearing
such as that held December 21, 2011, specifically as to any amounts for reasonable storage moving
or inventorying that exists at all, for any period of time whether before or after November 16
th
, 2011
and further that the undersigned was retaining any claim he may have to the return of the security
deposit in this matter, some $700 at least, and any offsets for any theft or damage to his property,
including consequential damages, and to that of anyone else's property at 121 River Rock ST 89501,
Coughlin's law office, and that no charges for inventorying shall issue as no inventory was ever
provided, and that the same shall be said for any moving charges, as no moving occurred, and that
Coughlin further retains his rights to seek redress for the inconvenience and expense associated with
the failure to put the hearing on calendar within 10 daysof the November 16, 2011 and for
inconvenience and any damages resulting from Merliss, Baker and Hills delays in returning both
Coughlin's, his clients, and others personal property, and any other claims, including that for the
damage deposit which Baker and Hill did not provide a written statement for within the time frame
required by law..
AFFIRMATION Pursuant to NRS 239B.030
The undersigned does hereby affirm that the preceding document does not contain
the social security number of any person.
DATED this 21
th
day of December, 2011,
2/4 Tenants Notice that No Agreement or Settlement was made or entered into by Tenant, and
that December 21, 2011 Order of Court was an Order
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_/s/ Zach Coughlin
Zach Coughlin
Tenant/Counterclaimant/Appellant
3/4 Tenants Notice that No Agreement or Settlement was made or entered into by Tenant, and
that December 21, 2011 Order of Court was an Order
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Zach Coughlin, declare:
On December 22, 2011, I, Mr. Zach Coughlin served the foregoing Tenants Notice that No
Agreement or Settlement was made or entered into by Tenant, and that December 21, 2011
Order of Court was an Order by depoisting a true and correct copy for mailing in the United States
postal mail to:
Richard G. Hill, Esq.
Casey D. Baker, Esq.
652 Forest Street
Reno, NV 89509
Attorneys for Matthew Merliss
Dated this 22
nd
of December, 2011
-----------------------------
Zach Coughlin
Tenant
4/4 Tenants Notice that No Agreement or Settlement was made or entered into by Tenant, and
that December 21, 2011 Order of Court was an Order
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Document Code:
loch Coughlin
817 N. Virginia S1. #2
Reno, NV 89501
Tele: 775-2296737
u. 949-667-7402
(
Pro pr Defend.:mlfTenantlCountcrclaimant
(
' r-.
_.
11 rrc 22 1'1112: I 9
-\
!.'.J.!1
t'
., . ' 1 '/'

t
JUSTICE COURT RENO TOWNSHIP
WASHOE COUNTY. NEVADA
Arr MERLlSS, MD,; MATIHEW J.
) CASE NO: rcv2011-001708
ERLISS LIVING TRUST )
Pluimin. ) DEPT. NO: 2
vs. )
)
CHARY BARKER COUGHLIN: ) norice of posting supersedeas bond as set hy
Defendant.
)
statute where i my slayf request for
)
suhmilfion of all of tcnant's outstanding
REEN ACTION LA SERVICE AND ITS) motion"
WNER NER Y R MACAL-CRUZ;
)
ARLENE SHARPE, REALTOR, personally
)
n and in her capacity as an employee of
)
ICKSON REALTY; DICKSON REALTY;
)
V ENERGY PUBLIC UTILITY
ORPORATION; NEVADA COURT
ERVICES; JOEL DURDEN, individually and
n his capacity as a process server for
EVADA COURT SERVICES.
Real Parties in
20
"{crest/Interpled Third Panics
21
22
notice of posting supersedea bond iS set by stalute where is my stllY
23
24
25
26
27
28
The undersigned hereby deposited $250 with the Reno Justice COllrt, whereupon NRS 40.385
requires a stay Dgranted. unless the RJC wants to say Coughlin is a commercial tenant. in which
case, a Summary Eviction Proceeding was impermissible where only a No Cause Eviction at ice
!Inotice of posting supcrscdus bond as sci bv !lalule where is my ."lay
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
was filed. IF there is ambiguity in the lease, summary judgment is not appropriate, issue of law and
fact not well suited to summary proceedings.
The undersigned NRS 40.380 Provisions governing appeals. Either party may, within 10 days,
appeal from the judgment rendered. But an appeal by the defendant shall not stay the execution of the
judgment, unless, within the 10 days, the defendant shall execute and file with the court or justice the
defendants undertaking to the plaintiff, with two or more sureties, in an amount to be fixed by the
court or justice, but which shall not be less than twice the amount of the judgment and costs, to the
effect that, if the judgment appealed from be affirmed or the appeal be dismissed, the appellant will
pay the judgment and the cost of appeal, the value of the use and occupation of the property, and
damages justly accruing to the plaintiff during the pendency of the appeal. Upon taking the appeal
and filing the undertaking, all further proceedings in the case shall be stayed.
[1911 CPA 659; RL 5601; NCL 9148]
NRS 40.385 Stay of execution upon appeal; duty of tenant who retains possession of premises to
pay rent during stay. Upon an appeal from an order entered pursuant to NRS 40.253:
1. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a stay of execution may be obtained by filing
with the trial court a bond in the amount of $250 to cover the expected costs on appeal. In an action
concerning a lease of commercial property or any other property for which the monthly rent exceeds
2/6 notice of posting supersedeas bond as set by statute where is my stay
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
$1,000, the court may, upon its own motion or that of a party, and upon a showing of good cause,
order an additional bond to be posted to cover the expected costs on appeal. A surety upon the bond
submits to the jurisdiction of the appellate court and irrevocably appoints the clerk of that court as the
suretys agent upon whom papers affecting the suretys liability upon the bond may be served.
Liability of a surety may be enforced, or the bond may be released, on motion in the appellate court
without independent action.
2. A tenant who retains possession of the premises that are the subject of the appeal during the
pendency of the appeal shall pay to the landlord rent in the amount provided in the underlying
contract between the tenant and the landlord as it becomes due. If the tenant fails to pay such rent, the
landlord may initiate new proceedings for a summary eviction by serving the tenant with a new
notice pursuant to NRS 40.253.
(Added to NRS by 1997, 3510)
NRS 40.390 Appellate court not to dismiss or quash proceedings for want of form. In all cases
of appeal under NRS 40.220 to 40.420, inclusive, the appellate court shall not dismiss or quash the
proceedings for want of form, provided the proceedings have been conducted substantially according
to the provisions of NRS 40.220 to 40.420, inclusive; and amendments to the complaint, answer or
summons, in matters of form only, may be allowed by the court at any time before final judgment
3/6 notice of posting supersedeas bond as set by statute where is my stay
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
upon such terms as may be just; and all matters of excuse, justification or avoidance of the allegations
in the complaint may be given in evidence under the answer.
[1911 CPA 660; RL 5602; NCL 9149]
NRS 40.400 Rules of practice. The provisions of NRS, Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure and
Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure relative to civil actions, appeals and new trials, so far as they
are not inconsistent with the provisions of NRS 40.220 to 40.420, inclusive, apply to the proceedings
mentioned in those sections.
The undersigned hereby deposited $250 with the Reno J ustice Court, whereupon NRS 40.385
requires a stay be granted, unless the RJ C wants to say Coughlin is a commercial tenant, in which
case, a Summary Eviction Proceeding was impermissible where only a No Cause Eviction Notice
was filed. IF there is ambiguity in the lease, summary judgment is not appropriate, issue of law and
fact not well suited to summary proceedings.
[1911 CPA 661; RL 5603; NCL 9150]
AFFIRMATION Pursuant to NRS 239B.030
The undersigned does hereby affirm that the preceding document does not contain
4/6 notice of posting supersedeas bond as set by statute where is my stay
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
the social security number of any person.
DATED this 21
th
day of December, 2011,
_/s/ Zach Coughlin
Zach Coughlin
Tenant/Counterclaimant/Appellant
5/6 notice of posting supersedeas bond as set by statute where is my stay
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Zach Coughlin, declare:
On December 22, 2011, I, Mr. Zach Coughlin served the foregoingnotice of posting
supersedeas bond as set by statute where is my stayby depoisting a true and correct copy for
mailing in the United States postal mail to:
Richard G. Hill, Esq.
Casey D. Baker, Esq.
652 Forest Street
Reno, NV 89509
Attorneys for Matthew Merliss
Dated this 22
nd
of December, 2011
-----------------------------
Zach Coughlin
Tenant
6/6 notice of posting supersedeas bond as set by statute where is my stay
-,
,'f
I

. "
J
2
3
A

b
1
b
B
JU
JJ
J2
J
JA
J
Jb
J
Jb
JB
2U
2J
22

FILED
11 DEC 22 PM 12: I 9
b1LY 1U11LL
hLl JUb1LLUh1
;
B
e
.
1
| t J1Lt LL11 LJ lBDD L`1
|PLJL1 LLL1T LJ WBSDDB ,PL L1t VPLP
BPB.
P00lBSS`
1HDDB.
VS.
BPB`
P0ClBSS.
1DDDB.
I
NBll NBlSS BDC DS lUS_l
JDlBSl _1BDD_V_
LBDCDlC/1BDlR
gD,[Ot
1BDBDVLBBD0BDl
LPL L. lBVJ11 JJ1|JJ
t1L

NLbLllLN PN PblPNb Ll
UlbHbbP/L LNLN PllbPL
`Mt1t P, lDB BDDVBBDllBC LDUl SSUB0 B JU0gPBDl CBlB0
L_ C

lD_ D_ B_l __|


_ J_ DlCBlg lDB BVClDD o BDBDl lDP B DD
'. b. a Col(v/9f -_ e1V
/ O
CDPPBlCB lBPSBS WlD lBDl |BSS lDBD 1_JJJJJ BD BBB WB BC DD
<G

(
DVBlPDBl , J_WlD BlDlBlB BBS DlWBVBl_
2A
2
2b
2
2b
NL` L1L1L1L_ PBBDl
DSlS DS UBlSB0BBS/ LDSl DD0 D lDB BRDUDl D .

14JJ[1)

^
ot ,
Notice of Posting and Acceptance of
SupersedeaSCost Bond on Appeal
1 O!3

+ L1LL1NL 1L ML111lLLN1PLL.
2
1UlSUBD D N1 JJ[ 1) JL1L1 |P[B) lBBlBDCDg JL1L1 |,

PB|BD PBy lDCBBC BDC DS UBlSBCBBSlLDS DDC SByS BXBCUDD D DB


A
BBBBC DlCBl D BVCDD UDBSS DHBWSB Dl0BlBC Dy DBLDUl.

b
S
U
JJ
J2

JA
JD
Jb
J
Jb
JS
2
2J
22
2
2A
=D
2b
2
2b
LP1LL
Notice of Posting and Acceptance of
Supersedeas/Cost Bond on Appeal
J11LL L1 1L 1LPLL
2<fG
.
1
2
3
A
D
t

B
S
IU
I1
12

1A
IG
1t
1
JB

blPb LlbVb
UlSUBDl lD 1L [D) BD0 JL1L [D), DBlBDy CBl|y lDBl BP B
DDD-BIly DVBl lDB BgB D1J yBBlS, BD0 lDBl DD _0@l2 , ZJ@,
SBIVBC B llUB BD0 CDllBCl CDy D \DB DlBgDDg
LBSBgBKBl/1CDBl0 L._LS@.
[BPB D 0DCUPBDl lDBl WBS SBlVBC)
B0CIBSSB0lD.
1CDBl0 L. |_LSg.
Z1DlBSl _1BDD_ V
T U. NPL' CBDS|lB0Dl PBDg D lDB UDlBC lBlBS PB, WlD DSlBgB
lU|y lBBC, BD B0VB|DB CDDlBDDg lDB BDDVB0BDlBC CDCUPBDl Bl
CDUlSB DlDUSDBSS.
[L|ly BD0 lBlB)_ D lDB DlC|DBly
IS
1
T1PLIN|LJL // J J JJ [1P
^
DUPDBl)

2U T1L1LPL L1VLL. | BISD0B|y DBD0 0BVBlB0 lDB BDDVB-0BDlBC


21
CDCUPBDl lDlDB BCClBSS/DRCBS DlDB BlSDDDBPB0BDDVB.
22
23
2A
2D
2b
2
2B
nt
Notice of Posting and Acceptance of
9rsedeas/Cost Bond on Appeal
ZBCD LDU@DD
1lDl BPB D 0lVBl
3<! 3
0ff8Z8, 00
From: Sferraza, Pete
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Thursday, December 22, 2011 2:33 PM
'zachcoughlin@hotmail.com'; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
Stancil, Karen
Subject: Hb. inventor continued
DIMr Coughlin:
The 8!yw8denied . You will need !o 8kthe District Court for 8!y.
P!5Irr
From: Zach Coughlin [mailto:zachcoughlin@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 22,2011 12:09 PM
To: Sferrza, Pete; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
Subject: inventor continued
Dea Judge Sferrazza ad M. Baer,
Additionally some rare book are missing, family photographs/keepsakes/heirlooms/media, believe the hammer weighted
action caslo 88 key PX 330 Is the model number, believe, I will have to chec8A##Further, this Is all moot at this point
as have filed a Supersedeas Bond of $250, and according to NRS 40.385, I automatically get a stay of eviction and am
entitled to return to the property and continue in possession. The sttute set the Supersedeas Bond (which yields
a s at $250 if rent is under $1000. unless the Cour wishes to rule that I am a cmmercial tenant.
However, if the cour does rule that I am a commerci .. tenant, the No Cause Evicion Notice in this case,
ynder NRS 40.253 makes a Summar Eviction Proceeding impermissible. as Summar Eviction Proceedings are
not allowed against commercial tenants where only a No cause Eviction Notice is filed. Gone or the other, but Mr. Hill
and Baker cannot have it both ways. Furher, the Courts Order of December 21, 2011 Is just that, and Order, its not an
agreement, its not a setlement, etc, etc. and the audio record clearly refect that.
NRS 40.385 Stay of execution upon appeal; duty of tenant who retins possession of premises to pay rent during sty.
Upon an appeal from an order entered pursuant to NRS 40.253:
1. Except as otherise provided in this subsection, a stay of execution may be obtained by fling with the trial court a
bond in the amount of $250 to cover the expected costs on appeal. In an action concerning a lease of commercial
proper or any other proper for wh|ch the monthly rent exceds $l,000, the cour may, upon it own motion or that of
a party, and upon a showing of good cause, order an additional bond to be posted to cover the expected costs on appeal.
A surety upon the bond submits to the jurisdiction of the appellate court and Irrevocably appoints the clerk of that cour
as the surety's agent upon whom papers afecting the suret's liability upon the bond may be sered. liability of a suret -'
may be enforced, or the bond may be released, on motion in the appellate court without independent action.
2. A tenant who retains possession of the premiSes that are the subject of the appeal during the pendency of the appeal
shall pay to the landlord rent in the amount provided in the underlying contract beteen the tenant and the landlord as it
becomes due. Ithe tenant fails to pay such rent, the landlord may initiate new proceedings for a summar eviction by
sering the tenant with a new notice pursuant to NRS 40.253.
Sincerely,
Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
1
N8vdbrNO! 9+73

** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electonic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
2510-2521, and may contain confdential information intended for the specifed individual (s) only. If you are not the intended
recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notifed that you have received this
document merror and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any action based on the contents of this information is
strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain information that is
privileged, attorey work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the
contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named
recipient(s), please notify the sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies many for
immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorey-client, work product, or
other applicable privilege.
2


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Downent Code:
Zach Couglin
817 N. Virgnia St. #2
Reno, NV 8 95 01
Tele: 775- 229-6737
Fa: 949-667-7402
( !
11 Z PH | |
Pro p oefendantrrenantcount

laimant
T1CE COURT RENO TOWNSHIP
i ASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA
T MERLlSS, M,; 1.
)
CASE NO: rev20l l-00l7 08
RLlSS LIVING TRUST )
Plaintif,
)
DEPT. NO: 2
vs.
:
)
ACHARY BARKER COUGHL ;
)
Defendant.

:
REEN ACTION LAWN SERVICk AND ITS
WNER NERY R MACAl
aorc@ os sggmcdcgsbonda sct b@
statutcwgcrcs@gsta @fog
sab@ on o @fsouwtandn@
otong
15
ARLENE SHARPE, REA
n and in her capacity a an I
ICKSON REALTY; DO
16
17
18
19
ENERGY PUBLIC UT
ORPORATION; NEVAD.
ERVICES; JOEL DURDE
his capacity a a process :
V ADA COURT SERVIC
Rea
20
terestJlnterpled Third Part
21 ;
22
ntrof
pt cm
23
24
25
26
27
26
The undersige hereby depsited S250 with the Reno Justice Court, whereupn NRS 40.3 85
requires a stay b gted, unless th t RJC wants to say Couglin is a commercial tenant, in which
mmN. "" ",oo,'''.
1/6 no
on a sctg tatat wbcrcs@gstg_

\
\
TOI 'ba$9)9-cZ1b-4bt2-9!d8-cf4elde

~^
~ IV cueBu, E.'.


tAM77$8o8S8
cc: Wj m dCm"=m775b71$
Og ww tw
FrQlI llchcoughlin
"
817 N. Virginia S. #
Reno, NV 89501
. 1: 775 229-6737
fa: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmai1.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
Qg@(t gm1 mmauche)
BW1107WmW o. 1<. Col

12-Z611 10:01.. p. 1 of 1$
201/ DEC 27
L
J WAT UrWWTWWW B D N nIr AW. A
t. m,. DA 1 P A W .CCMWMVwOtTU
Pl s P f WYOIT UW
Dear Mr. Baer,
,
I demand the rtum of my $70 secuity deposit immediately. You and your client face penalties for
your failure to provide a writen accounng with itemizations related to the security deposit within 30
days of November I, 2011. You faled to do to, and now you must retur the money to me,
immediately. You and Mr. Hlinterfered with my access to the propert as detailed i the emails
attached to this fa. Note the emails attached consist of 14 pages, despite the header Ot emails
indicating they are 30 pages, as I removed pages of"Ouitar Center" adds, etc. that were part of the
ataclunent relat ed to the Line 6 amplifer, for brevity's s. Ijust need/want about 8-16, more

hours
access to the propert to get my property. Te property was not damaged during the access provided
on Thursday and Friday. December 22-23.2011, and much was removed. Please just let me get tbe rest
of my property and do not incur any mor needless liability on your client's behalf by refusing me this
simple request.
Sincerely,
Zch CougWin, Esq.
1
invenotry of missing personal property continued: sony DCR-DVD610 with
8gb duo memory card
From: Zach Coughlin (zachcoughlin@hotmail.com)
Sent: Sun 12/25/11 5:22 PM
To: psferrazza@washoecounty.us; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
Dear J udge Sferrazza and Mr. Baker,

There is a very sentimental hand drawn picture/caricture of my former girlfriend and cotenant of 5 years Melissa
Ulloa and myself that I believe I forgot to grab on my hurried way out near 5:00pm on Friday. It was resting above
the crown modling atop the area attaching the dining room to the kitchen, where dishes were stored, in the dining
room area, it is a picture of her and I (she has glasses on in it) and I would very much like the opportunity to
retrieve it. It would have been one of the first things grabbed, but I wanted to place it some place where it would
not get bent or damaged and decided it would be safest to bring it in my uhaul's cab near the end of this moving
ordeal, but I am afraid I did not get a chance to grab it before Richard Hill showed up with Casey Baker in tow and
video cameras. How it was at all fair to expect me to enter my former home and law office, which has been
completely turned upside down by a burglary that was able to occure due to Baker and Hill's negligence, then
demand that I ignore that extremely emotionally upsetting occurance and immediately conduvct some crack
inventory of items damaged or stolen, all in less than an hour (after accounting for the travel time to get to
somewhere to send the Court and Baker an email inventory and the time that Richard Hill remained on the property
after 9 am on Thursday) is not at all clear to me.



In addition to the items previously disclosed as missing or damaged is the following, which is missing:
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DCR-DVD610-Handycam-Camcorder-Optical/dp/tech-
data/B00123Q8YQ/ref=de_a_smtd
That is a Sony DCR-DVD610. It had a somewhat expensive media card in it, which sentimental and work related
media on it that is irreplaceable. The card itself (and this camera had one inside and one taped to it) cost money
too:
http://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-16GB-Memory-Stick-PRO/dp/B00488CN1O/ref=sr_1_12?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1324862012&sr=1-12
I believe one of the microphones previously indicated as missing has been found, a Shure SM58a, however, I have
not been able to test whether it is damaged or not, yet).
Two of these are missing as well: http://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-Cruzer-Flash-Drive-SDCZ36-032G-
A11/dp/B001T9CTS2/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1324862190&sr=1-2 at a current price of $27 per
on amazon, however, media and files were on those that is irreplaceable and valuable to me.
The mold that I wrote to Merliss of on May 14, 2011 is in a very large clear bag on the property. The original
carpet, the 100% nylon brown shag, slumlord 101 carept is on the property as well and should be retained should
Dr. Merliss want it. That carpet became moldy and had a poor smell when Merliss' handyman twice flooded (on
two separate occasions) the washing machine in the kitchen). I wouldlike my car seats and other items that are still
on the property for which Richard Hill and Casey Baker's interference preveneted me from having adequate time
and access to remove such.
Additionally, while I have not conducted a complete review of all my hard drives, the desktops hard drive indicates
file on it were modified on at least two occasions while in Hill and Baker's custody, both on December 6th, and
December 14th, 2011. This is completely unacceptable.
Sincerely,


Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
Page 1of 30 Hotmail Print Message
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.


From: zachcoughlin@hotmail.com
To: rhill@richardhillaw.com; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com; psferrazza@washoecounty.us
Subject: interference with my right to get my property
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 01:44:51 -0800

Some of my property remains on the premises. I want access to it, some of it, I believe even
involves both my law practice and my mattress business, and reserve my rights to sue for
damages, even the consequential/punitive kind in the Schiff case where a seafood distributor in
Nevada was awared as damages the entire value of his business, which went under as a result of a
Landlord's nefarious deeds. My rights under the Court's Order of December 21, 2011 where
interferred with. To wit, Richard Hill's contractor, for some strange reason, removed a ladder I
own from the property, preventing my access to the attic. Further, the entire back porch remained
boarded up during the entirety of my access to the property this Thursday and Friday, that
prevented me from both removing my property and in returning Dr. Merliss's property to the state
I would have liked to leave it in. Additionally, despite not having a chained padlock on the back
fence for the vast majority of the time theproperty was unoccupied, even where refusing to let me
so secure the property, all of the sudden, a chain link padlocked is secured to the backyard/porch
gate when it comes time for me to be allowed to access the property and remove my belongs.
Neither Hill or Baker responded to my calls and written, hand delivered requests for them to
remove the lock from the back gate until it was far too late to avoid interfering with my rights
under the Order, nor did either of them ever have the door the house on the back porch be put in
an accessible state, as it remained boarded up.
Sincerely,


Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Page 2of 30 Hotmail Print Message

RE: interference with my right to get my property
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.
From: Richard Hill (rhill@richardhillaw.com)
Sent: Sat 12/24/11 6:29 AM
To: zachcoughlin@hotmail.com
your lying knows no bounds - does it?
you need to take stock of yourself.
just where do you think you will be in 5 years??

stay away from the property!

From: Zach Coughlin [mailto:zachcoughlin@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2011 1:45 AM
To: Richard Hill; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com; psferrazza@washoecounty.us
Subject: interference with my right to get my property

Some of my property remains on the premises. I want access to it, some of it, I believe even
involves both my law practice and my mattress business, and reserve my rights to sue for
damages, even the consequential/punitive kind in the Schiff case where a seafood distributor in
Nevada was awared as damages the entire value of his business, which went under as a result of a
Landlord's nefarious deeds. My rights under the Court's Order of December 21, 2011 where
interferred with. To wit, Richard Hill's contractor, for some strange reason, removed a ladder I
own from the property, preventing my access to the attic. Further, the entire back porch remained
boarded up during the entirety of my access to the property this Thursday and Friday, that
prevented me from both removing my property and in returning Dr. Merliss's property to the state
I would have liked to leave it in. Additionally, despite not having a chained padlock on the back
fence for the vast majority of the time the propertywas unoccupied, even where refusing to let me
so secure the property, all of the sudden, a chain link padlocked is secured to the backyard/porch
gate when it comes time for me to be allowed to access the property and remove my belongs.
Neither Hill or Baker responded to my calls and written, hand delivered requests for them to
remove the lock from the back gate until it was far too late to avoid interfering with my rights
under the Order, nor did either of them ever have the door the house on the back porch be put in
an accessible state, as it remained boarded up.
Sincerely,


Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775229-6737
Page 3of 30 Hotmail Print Message

interference with my right to get my property
fax: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2109/4700 - Release Date: 12/24/11
From: Zach Coughlin (zachcoughlin@hotmail.com)
Sent: Sat 12/24/11 1:44 AM
To: Richard Hill (rhill@richardhillaw.com); cdbaker@richardhillaw.com; psferrazza@washoecounty.us
Some of my property remains on the premises. I want access to it, some of it, I believe even
involves both my law practice and my mattress business, and reserve my rights to sue for
damages, even the consequential/punitive kind in the Schiff case where a seafood distributor in
Nevada was awared as damages the entire value of his business, which went under as a result of a
Landlord's nefarious deeds. My rights under the Court's Order of December 21, 2011 where
interferred with. To wit, Richard Hill's contractor, for some strange reason, removed a ladder I
own from the property, preventing my access to the attic. Further, the entire back porch remained
boarded up during the entirety of my access to the property this Thursday and Friday, that
prevented me from both removing my property and in returning Dr. Merliss's property to the state
I would have liked to leave it in. Additionally, despite not having a chained padlock on the back
fence for the vast majority of the time theproperty was unoccupied, even where refusing to let me
so secure the property, all of the sudden, a chain link padlocked is secured to the backyard/porch
gate when it comes time for me to be allowed to access the property and remove my belongs.
Neither Hill or Baker responded to my calls and written, hand delivered requests for them to
remove the lock from the back gate until it was far too late to avoid interfering with my rights
under the Order, nor did either of them ever have the door the house on the back porch be put in
an accessible state, as it remained boarded up.
Sincerely,


Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
Page 4of 30 Hotmail Print Message

River rock

RE: inventory continued
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.
From: Richard Hill (rhill@richardhillaw.com)
Sent: Fri 12/23/11 11:18 AM
To: zachcoughlin@hotmail.com
Cc: 'Casey Baker' (cdbaker@richardhillaw.com)
Mr coughl i n - r epor t s r each me t hat you have peopl e over at t he pr oper t y
hel pi ng you move.
Pl ease be sur e t hat each of t hemsi gns of f on t he f or mas or der ed by t he
j udge.
Thank you i n advance f or your cont i nued cour t esi es & cooper at i on
Rgh
CONFI DENTI AL: ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT; ATTORNEY- CLI ENT PRI VI LEGE
Thi s e- mai l may cont ai n l egal l y pr i vi l eged or conf i dent i al i nf or mat i on. I f
you ar e not t he i nt ended r eci pi ent , pl ease do not r ead, copy, use, or
di scl ose t hi s communi cat i on t o anyone ot her t han t he i nt ended r eci pi ent . I f
you have r ecei ved t hi s message i n er r or , pl ease not i f y t he sender and del et e
t he emai l message f r omyour syst em. Thank you.
Ci r cul ar 230 Not i ce.
To ensur e compl i ance wi t h r equi r ement s i mposed by t he I RS, we i nf or myou
t hat any U. S. f eder al t ax advi ce cont ai ned i n t hi s communi cat i on ( i ncl udi ng
any at t achment s) i s not i nt ended or wr i t t en t o be used, and cannot be used,
f or t he pur pose of ( i ) avoi di ng penal t i es under t he I nt er nal Revenue Code or
( i i ) pr omot i ng, mar ket i ng or r ecommendi ng t o anot her par t y any t r ansact i on
or mat t er addr essed her ei n.
From: Zach Coughlin (zachcoughlin@hotmail.com)
Sent: Fri 12/23/11 2:33 AM
To: psferrazza@washoecounty.us; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
5 attachments
IMG_20110522_163658 missing items Onkyo receiver tuner Sony subwoofer Technic speaker.jpg (750.3 KB) , IMG_20110818_205455
Toshiba 62hm15a hdtv.jpg (1075.7 KB) , Line 6 Spider III 15 15W 1x8 Guitar Combo Amp and more Guitar Amplifiers at
GuitarCenter_com.htm (146.2 KB) , receipt for purchase of lamp for Toshiba 62HM15A $87.pdf (31.7 KB) , IMG_20110818_203900 hdtv
52 inch in back bedroom.jpg (234.7 KB)
Dear J udge Sferrazza and Mr. Baker,

I am writing to further supplement and clarify the inventory of items missing. Mr. Baker and Mr. Hill, please know YOU ARE PLACED ON A
LITIGATION HOLD NOTICE REQUIRING YOU TO RETAIN AND PRODUCE ALL PHOTOGRAPHIC/VIDEO/AUDIO EVIDENCE YOU OR YOUR
AGENTS HAVE COMPILED TO THIS DATE AND IN THE FUTURE, ESPECIALLY WITH RESPECT TO PERSONAL PROPERTY ON THE PREMISES,
INCLUDING ANY EVIDENCE WHICH REFLECTS UPON WHAT WAS STOLEN OR DAMAGED INCIDENT TO THE BURGLARY OF APPROXIMATELY
DECEMBER 12TH, 2011 (INCLUDING THE POLICE REPORTS YOU SHOULD HAVE MADE). I reserve the right to update this inventory if any of
these items are found, or if others are discovered lost or damaged

I hereby reserve the right to amend this inventory should any of these items turn up under some of the "rifled" through, the use Casey Baker,
Page 5of 30 Hotmail Print Message
Esq.'s expression property, that was completely strewn about the premises. But I doubt they will.

Amongst the items that were missing upon what was obviously an upsetting emotional hurried inventory (you can imagine going into your
home and seeing it look like it been subject to an extensive burglary), were:
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CASPX330 That is the 88 key keyboard, with hammer weighted action, Casio Previa PX-330 that sat atop the
desk in the front office is missing, very obviously
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/accessories/lr-baggs-dual-source-system That LR Baggs Dual Source blend system was put into the Charvel
acoustic "cutaway" guitar that is missing, which was in the front office, and was in excellent condition, in addition to having the expensive after
market LR Baggs dual source system added to it: http://en.allexperts.com/q/Guitar-General-649/Charvel-jackson-guitar.htm-Drive/13055863
http://www.hdtvsolutions.com/Toshiba-62HM15A-reviews.htm I had just purchased a new lamp for that television. Please see attached receipt
for that lamp and attached picture of that Toshiba 62 inch television.
http://www.guitarcenter.com/Line-6-Spider-III-15-15W-1x8-Guitar-Combo-Amp-482276-i1979323.gc That is a Line 6 Spyder III guitar amplifier
that is missing
http://reviews.cnet.com/projection-tvs/samsung-hl-p5685w-56/4505-6484_7-31008492.html?tag=subnav I did not see this Samsung HLP5685
W hdtv dlp at the property. I want to verify tomorrow that it is for sure gone (Yes, its a large television, but it the top had been temporarily
removed from its pedestal.
Additionally, amongst the items that were "rifled" through incident to the burglary was an AKG C300B microphone that is heavily scratched up
and is obviously damaged:
http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/C3000B/?
utm_source=Google&utm_medium=PPC&utm_campaign=livesound&utm_term=akg_c_3000_b&adpos=1t1&gclid=CJ6S_4rkl60CFQ5lhwodV2YG4w
missing speaker as well technic sb-2840
Sony power subwoofer (see picture attached of Onkyo Receiver stacked audio system)
I believe a 1000W Sony Xplod Car Audio 12 inch subwoofer, new in box was taken as well, it retailed for, I believe, about $75 after taxes:
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Sony-Xplod-XS-GTX120LW-12-Car-Subwoofer/12016333
A Sony audio receiver appears to be damaged, I will provide the model number later.
http://www.amazon.com/Philips-32PFL3505D-F7-32-Inch-Black/dp/B003IT6Z40 That is the model of the manufacture in 2010 Phillips 32 inch
lcd television/computer monitor that was utilized in a dual screen display setup at the lawyer's desk in the commercial law office at 121 River
Rock St. Mr. Baker correctly identified it as missing after the break in, as he did the 62HM15A Toshiba HDTV in the living room, and the various
audio receivers, etc. in Mr. Bakers attached December 14th, email (attached and admitted into evidence along with the reply from
zachcoughlin@hotmail.com at the hearing on December 21, 2011). In his December 14, 2011 writing Mr. Baker wrote: "The River Rock property
has been broken into. We believe the break-in occurred sometime on Monday, December 12, 2011. There appear to be items missing,
including the TV in the living room, perhaps a computer monitor, and perhaps some stereo equipment. I cant tell what else. The contents of
the residence appear to
have been rifled through."
http://www.americanmusical.com/Item--i-SHU-BETA58A-LIST I believe that microphone is missing, it is a Shure Beta 58A Dynamic Microphone.
I reserve the right to update this inventory if it is found.
A foam mattress, size full is missing. The wooden platform for it is oddly part in the flower bed and part seemingly used to secure a window in
some fashion, estimated value $800
Two, (2), of these http://www.amazon.com/Keurig-B60-Special-Single-Cup-Home-Brewing/dp/B000AQSMPO $165 Kuerig B60 Coffee Machines
appear to be missing
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Western-Digital-WDBAAU0020HBK-NESN-Elements-Desktop-Hard-Drive/13055863 Two, (2) of those Western
Digital Elements 2TB external hard drives $190.
As for damaged items, the Sony hdtv 52 inch television in the back bedroom is not turning on, please see attached picture (a clearer picture
and model number will be forthcoming).

Strangely, its appears that, even where the contractor (whose bill for $1,060 included a notation of "fixing leak in the basement") boarded up
the back porch, he apparently did not do it very well, as the window to the back door, inside the porch, appears to have been smashed.

I believe there are more things missing or damaged but this is not a task that can be done extremely quickly, and I reserve the right to
supplement this inventory as more missing or damaged items become apparent. I would like some additional time at the property due to
Richard Hill's interference on Thursday and Hill's contractor having taken my ladder, which I was relying on for accessing and inventorying the
attic. Further, I wish to leave this property in very, very good shape for Dr. Merliss. I have respect for Dr. Merliss as I do for this Court, Mr.
Baker, and Mr. Hill, for whatever it is worth. Admittedly this litigation has gotten a bit scrappy, and we have all been challenged by a Landlord
Tenant Statute that is not always entirely clear and does not have the benefit of a great deal of intermediate level appellate court case law to
guide litigants through the ambiguities encountered throughout this case. I want to leave this property in as good as shape as possible for Dr.
Merliss, and believe Hill and Baker are intent on limiting my opportunity to do that as much as they possibly can because they want to pursue
some theories of recovery based upon leaving property at the location, etc., etc., and have their contractors do their typically inflated billing for
work that, as here, ultimately is not very effective, as this "securing" of the property, especially where a window unit air conditioner held in
place by nothing but duct tape and lacking even a simple jam rod atop the sliding window, was left in place on a side of the house exposed to
a sidewalk near the Lakemill Lodge. Or, Hill and Baker may just be legitimately fearful that I may do something to harm their client's interest at
the property and merely zealously advocating on Dr. Merliss's behalf. I feel like an additional 8-16 hours at the property may yield a lot of
benefit to the overall appearance and state of the property.

I realize a stay was denied, however, I believe NRS 40.385 may be akin to the automatic stays attendant to bankruptcies.

Sincerely and Respectfully,

Zach Coughlin, Esq.
Page 6of 30 Hotmail Print Message

Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.


From: zachcoughlin@hotmail.com
To: psferrazza@washoecounty.us; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
Subject: inventory continued
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:09:18 -0800

Dear J udge Sferrazza and Mr. Baker,
Additionally some rare book are missing, family photographs/keepsakes/heirlooms/media, I believe the hammer weighted action Casio 88 key
PX 330 is the model number, I believe, I will have to check.......Further, this is all moot at this point as I have filed a Supersedeas Bond of $250,
and according to NRS 40.385, I automatically get a stay of eviction and am entitled to return to the property and continue in possession. The
statute sets the Supersedeas Bond (which yields a stay) at $250 if rent is under $1000, unless the Court wishes to rule that I am a
commercial tenant. However, if the court does rule that I am a commercial tenant, the No Cause Eviction Notice in this case, under
NRS 40.253 makes a Summary Eviction Proceeding impermissible, as Summary Eviction Proceedings are not allowed against commercial
tenants where only a No Cause Eviction Notice is filed. Its one or the other, but Mr. Hill and Baker cannot have it both ways. Further, the
Courts Order of December 21, 2011 is just that, and Order, its not an agreement, its not a settlement, etc, etc. and the audio record clearly
reflects that.

NRS 40.385 Stay of execution upon appeal; duty of tenant who retains possession of premises to pay rent during stay. Upon an appeal from an
order entered pursuant to NRS 40.253:
1. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a stay of execution may be obtained by filing with the trial court a bond in the amount of
$250 to cover the expected costs on appeal. In an action concerning a lease of commercial property or any other property for which the
monthly rent exceeds $1,000, the court may, upon its own motion or that of a party, and upon a showing of good cause, order an additional
bond to be posted to cover the expected costs on appeal. A surety upon the bond submits to the jurisdiction of the appellate court and
irrevocably appoints the clerk of that court as the surety's agent upon whom papers affecting the surety's liability upon the bond may be
served. Liability of a surety may be enforced, or the bond may be released, on motion in the appellate court without independent action.
2. A tenant who retains possession of the premises that are the subject of the appeal during the pendency of the appeal shall pay to the
landlord rent in the amount provided in the underlying contract between the tenant and the landlord as it becomes due. If the tenant fails to
pay such rent, the landlord may initiate new proceedings for a summary eviction by serving the tenant with a new notice pursuant to NRS
40.253.


Sincerely,


Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
Page 7of 30 Hotmail Print Message
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.


--Forwarded Message Attachment--



z Login
z 866-498-7882
z My Account
z Wish List
z Financing
z Help
z Feedback
z Change
FREE SHIPPING, NO MINIMUM*
z Store Finder
z Shopping Cart
z Products
{ Guitars
Top categories
1. New Arrivals
2. View all Guitars
3. Electric Guitars
4. Acoustic Guitars
5. Acoustic-Electric Guitars
6. Semi-Hollow & Hollow Electric Guitars
7. Classical Guitars
8. Left Handed Electric Guitars
9. Guitar Value Packs
Top brands
1. Fender
2. Gibson
3. Ibanez
4. Epiphone
5. Taylor
6. Martin
Guitar Center
KEYWORDS OR ITEM #

Page 8of 30 Hotmail Print Message
7. Takamine
8. PRS
9. Gretsch
Related Accessories
1. Amplifiers
2. Cables
3. Cases & Gig bags
4. Effects
5. Boutique Pedals
6. Stands
7. Strings
8. Tuners
9. Capos
10. All accessories
Used, Vintage & More
1. Used Guitars
2. Used Electric Guitars
3. Used Acoustic Guitars
4. Used Guitar Amps
5. Vintage Guitars
6. Platinum / High End Guitars
Top Searches
1. Les Paul
2. Fender Stratocaster
3. Telecaster
4. Gibson SG
5. Ukulele
Clearance / On Sale
1. Clearance
2. Electric Guitar Clearance
3. Acoustic Guitar Clearance
4. Acoustic-Electric Guitar Clearance
5. Guitar Amp Clearance
6. Rebate deals
{ Bass
Top categories
1. New Arrivals
2. View all Basses
3. Electric Bass
4. 4 String Bass
5. Acoustic Bass
6. Fretless Electric Bass
7. Signature Models
8. Value Packages
Top brands
1. Ampeg
2. Behringer
3. Epiphone
4. Fender
5. Gallien-Krueger
6. Hofner
7. Music Man
8. Schecter
Page 9of 30 Hotmail Print Message

(Based on 36 reviews)
$119.00
z Shop By Category
z Browse by Brand
z Guitars
z Bass
z Keyboards
z Drums
z Pro Audio
z Accessories
z Platinum Gear
z Vintage Gear
z My Guitar Center
z Account Info
z Wish List
z Shopping Cart
z Order History
z Price Guarantee
z Warranty
z Rebates
z Returns
z Newsletter
z Pro Coverage
z Support & Services
z Locations
z Contact Us
z Careers
z Affiliate Program
z GC Pro
z Gift Guide
z Company Information
z Events & Promotions
z Guitar Center Sessions
z Artist Interviews
z Shipping
z Donations
z Sitemap
UNITED STATES: CHANGE COUNTRY

z Featured Services
Financing
increase your
purchasing power
FEEDBACK
our ears are
always open
GC Garage
guitar tune ups
Page 26of 30 Hotmail Print Message

RE: inventory continued
and repair
View Our Catalog
view this month's
products & services
Gift Card
the perfect gift for
every musician
Musician Services
mix, master,
distribution & more


Copyright Guitar Center, Inc. -All Rights Reserved. - Terms of Use | Your Privacy Rights | Purchase Terms & Conditions
z
z
z
z
FOLLOW GUITAR CENTER:
z
z
z
z
KEYWORDS OR ITEM #

From: Sferrazza, Pete (psferrazza@washoecounty.us)
Sent: Thu 12/22/11 2:33 PM
To: zachcoughlin@hotmail.com; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
Cc: Stancil, Karen (KStancil@washoecounty.us)
Dear Mr Coughlin:

The stay was denied . You will need to ask the District Court for a stay.

Pete Sferrazza
Page 27of 30 Hotmail Print Message

inventory continued

From: Zach Coughlin [mailto:zachcoughlin@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 12:09 PM
To: Sferrazza, Pete; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
Subject: inventory continued
Dear J udge Sferrazza and Mr. Baker,
Additionally some rare book are missing, family photographs/keepsakes/heirlooms/media, I believe the hammer weighted action Casio 88 key
PX 330 is the model number, I believe, I will have to check.......Further, this is all moot at this point as I have filed a Supersedeas Bond of
$250, and according to NRS 40.385, I automatically get a stay of eviction and am entitled to return to the property and continue in
possession. The statute sets the Supersedeas Bond (which yields a stay) at $250 if rent is under $1000, unless the Court
wishes to rule that I am a commercial tenant. However, if the court does rule that I am a commercial tenant, the No Cause
Eviction Notice in this case, under NRS 40.253 makes a Summary Eviction Proceeding impermissible, as Summary Eviction
Proceedings are not allowed against commercial tenants where only a No Cause Eviction Notice is filed. Its one or the other, but Mr. Hill and
Baker cannot have it both ways. Further, the Courts Order of December 21, 2011 is just that, and Order, its not an agreement, its not a
settlement, etc, etc. and the audio record clearly reflects that.
NRS 40.385 Stay of execution upon appeal; duty of tenant who retains possession of premises to pay rent during stay. Upon an appeal from
an order entered pursuant to NRS 40.253:
1. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a stay of execution may be obtained by filing with the trial court a bond in the amount of
$250 to cover the expected costs on appeal. In an action concerning a lease of commercial property or any other property for which the
monthly rent exceeds $1,000, the court may, upon its own motion or that of a party, and upon a showing of good cause, order an additional
bond to be posted to cover the expected costs on appeal. A surety upon the bond submits to the jurisdiction of the appellate court and
irrevocably appoints the clerk of that court as the surety's agent upon whom papers affecting the surety's liability upon the bond may be
served. Liability of a surety may be enforced, or the bond may be released, on motion in the appellate court without independent action.
2. A tenant who retains possession of the premises that are the subject of the appeal during the pendency of the appeal shall pay to the
landlord rent in the amount provided in the underlying contract between the tenant and the landlord as it becomes due. If the tenant fails to
pay such rent, the landlord may initiate new proceedings for a summary eviction by serving the tenant with a new notice pursuant to NRS
40.253.
Sincerely,
Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.
From: Zach Coughlin (zachcoughlin@hotmail.com)
Sent: Thu 12/22/11 12:09 PM
To: psferrazza@washoecounty.us; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
Page 28of 30 Hotmail Print Message

partial inventory
Dear J udge Sferrazza and Mr. Baker,
Additionally some rare book are missing, family photographs/keepsakes/heirlooms/media, I believe the hammer weighted action Casio 88 key
PX 330 is the model number, I believe, I will have to check.......Further, this is all moot at this point as I have filed a Supersedeas Bond of $250,
and according to NRS 40.385, I automatically get a stay of eviction and am entitled to return to the property and continue in possession. The
statute sets the Supersedeas Bond (which yields a stay) at $250 if rent is under $1000, unless the Court wishes to rule that I am a
commercial tenant. However, if the court does rule that I am a commercial tenant, the No Cause Eviction Notice in this case, under
NRS 40.253 makes a Summary Eviction Proceeding impermissible, as Summary Eviction Proceedings are not allowed against commercial
tenants where only a No Cause Eviction Notice is filed. Its one or the other, but Mr. Hill and Baker cannot have it both ways. Further, the
Courts Order of December 21, 2011 is just that, and Order, its not an agreement, its not a settlement, etc, etc. and the audio record clearly
reflects that.

NRS 40.385 Stay of execution upon appeal; duty of tenant who retains possession of premises to pay rent during stay. Upon an appeal from an
order entered pursuant to NRS 40.253:
1. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a stay of execution may be obtained by filing with the trial court a bond in the amount of
$250 to cover the expected costs on appeal. In an action concerning a lease of commercial property or any other property for which the
monthly rent exceeds $1,000, the court may, upon its own motion or that of a party, and upon a showing of good cause, order an additional
bond to be posted to cover the expected costs on appeal. A surety upon the bond submits to the jurisdiction of the appellate court and
irrevocably appoints the clerk of that court as the surety's agent upon whom papers affecting the surety's liability upon the bond may be
served. Liability of a surety may be enforced, or the bond may be released, on motion in the appellate court without independent action.
2. A tenant who retains possession of the premises that are the subject of the appeal during the pendency of the appeal shall pay to the
landlord rent in the amount provided in the underlying contract between the tenant and the landlord as it becomes due. If the tenant fails to
pay such rent, the landlord may initiate new proceedings for a summary eviction by serving the tenant with a new notice pursuant to NRS
40.253.


Sincerely,


Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.
From: Zach Coughlin (zachcoughlin@hotmail.com)
Sent: Thu 12/22/11 11:01 AM
To: psferrazza@washoecounty.us; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com

Dear Judge Sferrazza,

I respectfully submit to you that the inventorying of stolen, lost, or damaged personal property i simply not possible by 11 am given the
interference conducted by Baker and Hill, their removing a ladder to the attic (that belonged to me, no less) from the property, their keeping
the property boarded up, the incredibly strewn about/burglarized appearance and state of the entire property, etc, etc. It is simply not possible
Page 29of 30 Hotmail Print Message
To: 4baS9639-c21b-4b(2-gedB-cf4e3de
HomaIPtMessage

FrOl: zachcolghl tn

t provide" complete accounting o rio eJctIy how aaurate any acountng might be a this time.
Bnal Proper, Indudlng tet u$ed 11 th commelClel business run o of 121 River R st Rt N
62hmlS
Toshib 62HM15A Projecion T (62HM15A)
12-26-11 ID:07am p, 15 of 15
Page 30 of30
expenive 51 missing. pInsive flr and kchen appliancs missing
.
3 inch l tlevision computr monitor ottreomputer monit/s
....
Sral vintage and epensiv high e audio rde
_ri gu/.rs, severel high end profe5lonaleudio recording mcrophones, llenivt, music equipment
lWrai high end memory fom metren. brokenwomemory fom m;UrlSplatrm. parally missing,
wooden st r on porch,
.
jelry
-,
several hard drlles, b rmal en Imral
several HOs and computer monitor
I Intrf ace, sound and ve ards,
computer R Us gultar.mpllflers, I.mil heirloom memtos and keepsakes, obviously It rlculous.nd wm ner Imposible t rush
Int. tis proper and deliver you a perfea Invntory of all tat Is mising or cmaged wn an hour or 5_.
flpensive elecr sr multiple high endear audio amplifier, family heirloms audio and video tapes mlsslng. m Intellectual proper a
.
.
. ..
. .live media mluing. e ,e
zc Coughlll E
817 N. Virginia St. 12
Rn, N S9SO I
tl: 775 229.6737
f: 949 667 7402
ZhCghlinhOil.cm
Nevada BNo: 97
.. Nod. .. Thi. mtIIClnd eplnyinedomcnll .. ccwC b LhodcLx CunicLion P'.cy h\ IH U.s.c. if 2510.252I, .. d . ,
conin nd<Lill ;nf_i .. inenda fo l Icf,d itivid .. 1 (I) oy. If)u I'" noL Lh inlndo niPaL or lnaL "ibc ! d1ivmng il 1
1
.
inlended npcL, )''' h

IIOLl nc; II y hIIvc f lhil duml in cl d lhlL Iny riew, diui,Lcn cyi" o t lkig of Iny
"LOOI b o I onl," orll" 'nfomlLOon . _cdy plntd. TI m"as. I =nnt0l,nWnmdnly ]o|t. mm drmPtt mc
eama;" nJrmtNUt9$0; 0tt0mwMkpradt ar .J.""t fa dildasw. Undl, a/bll |0w.Q}l omttl PtWmd
: Ir. f/I!f Ut ol0dMIM0,Cn. dlstrlbJt1 OlnYlalon rotIIM_Su.d I0Jt Wk60|lIMNon thfCGt.nC 01
til,. 1WtI Jhi.t 0n0_y b uoW"'. II Y" rW t" IS I 'r, o lr nDtt nomdrIC;'tjSJ, plnsl natlf r
SfT, ",lt tlls l-a" Irn}luct.r, qnddMtroyonymM In 0g ]mMWt00ttQ.KtOW JyoIwzoUzftn t III
rKlll t(.) >0t<mW 04hyAHwy-Ozhlsyk,o 0UlWop|f0J|#p|r|z .
To: (ba59639-cl1h-4b4l-ged-cf4e]

ri`Zlcbcough111

1Z-Z6-11 l;Z3pa p. 1 of J7
1
2
3

5
6
7

9
10
11
12
..... -.
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
.23
2.
25
26
27
28
Document Code:
Zach Coughlin
b1N. Virginia m.Z
Reno, W bV31 .
Tele: 3-ZZV-J
Fa: V4V-7-74Z
PrC.e DefendantenantlCounterclaimant
.
roSTICE COURT RENO TOWNSHW
WASHOE COUNlY, NEVADA
-
ATT MERLISS, MD, ; MATTHEW J.
ERLISS UVlNG TRUST
Plaintif,
v.
.
ACHARY BARKER COUGHUN;
._.
Defendant. . .
)
)
)

1
J
)
)
REEN ACTION LAWN SERVICE AND ITS
)
WNER NERY R MACArCRUZ;
)
SHARPE, REAL TOR, personally
)
ad mher capacity a an employee of
)
ICKSON REALl; DICKSON REALlY;
)
V ENERGY PUBUC UTILITY
ORPORATION NEVADA COURT
ERVICES; JOEL DURDEN, individually and
his capacity a a process server for
,mV ADA COURT SERVICES.
Real Parties m
el terpled Third Paties
.
CASE NO: mVZ11-1b
.
DEPT. NO: Z
.
.
3 b&. 0 L
[mN fpR
L
M&
( ont 8

0
2 M.

i
|or @ubmionof
g @ogs
0Ww. 0 bs 00 w m p Y
D M& JLI
M' 9B 2 N 3 p 2
W 3 J| @on of M!
Proof of Landlord's Conversion of Tenant's Personal Poperty, V POFJd J41. What can the tenant
.

.. . .
do Hthe landlord .win not retur his pperty or uhe disputes the landlord's charges? .
1122 0 0 U!s 0 L J m
L D & J
2I IJ 8hm Lam 8g@toitigntoH Notiontg8ow@sm
@ M J| w0 |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"he tenant ma> +ile, along Aith the a**ro*riate +ee;, a D6otion to Conte;t )er;onal )ro*ert> 7ienE on
a -u;tice Court +orm. See NRS (!.2%F7?. "he tenant ma> al;o ;ue +or actual damage; and *uniti:e
damage; u* to G1,!!! i+ the landlord hold; the tenantB; *ro*ert> in an e++ort to en;ure that the tenant
*a>; rent. See NRS 1184.2!. )lea;e aAard thi; *enalt> to the tenant here. How does t*e tenant
contest t*e lien0

"he "enant can conte;t the lien H> +iling a Notice o+ 1**o;ition to 7ien Aith the clerI o+ the -u;tice Court on a +orm
*ro:ided H> the Court. 3oAe:er, the "enantB; Notice o+ 1**o;ition to 7ien mu;t He +iled Aithin da>; a+ter the *er;on
+iling the notice recei:e; the Notice o+ Sale H> auction. "here+ore, the "enant mu;t Aait until he recei:e; the Notice o+
Sale He+ore +iling the Notice o+ 1**o;ition to 7ien. See NRS 1!8.%.

How long m+st a landlord 1eep a tenant2s propert. after e3iction0

4 landlord mu;t ;a+el> ;tore a tenantB; *ro*ert> +or %! da>; a+ter the tenantB; aHandonment or e:iction. See NRS
1184.($!F1?

Can t*e landlord ref+se to release a tenant2s propert. after e3iction0

"he landlord mu;t *ro:ide rea;onaHle acce;; and o**ortunit> +or the tenant or hi; authoriJed re*re;entati:e to retrie:e
*er;onal *ro*ert> le+t Hehind. "he landlord ma> charge and collect the rea;onaHle and actual co;t; o+ in:entor>, mo:ing
and ;torage He+ore relea;ing the *ro*ert> to the tenant. "he landlord cannot reKuire the tenant to *a> rent or the co;t; o+
the e:iction a; a condition to relea;ing the *ro*ert>. See NRS 1184.($!F1?Fa?

4*at if more t*an 5) da.s *a3e e6pired since t*e tenant2s e3iction0

4+ter the e'*iration o+ the %!#da> *eriod, the landlord ma> di;*o;e o+ the *ro*ert> and reco:er hi; rea;onaHle co;t; out o+
the *ro*ert> i+:

1. 3e ha; made rea;onaHle e++ort; to locate the tenant8
2. 3a; noti+ied the tenant in Ariting o+ hi; intention to di;*o;e o+ the
*ro*ert>8 and
%. 1( da>; ha:e ela*;ed ;ince the notice Aa; gi:en to the tenant.
NRS 1184.($!F1?FH?
2,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4*at can t*e tenant do if t*e landlord will not ret+rn *is propert. or if *e disp+tes t*e landlord2s c*arges0

"he tenant ma> +ile, along Aith the a**ro*riate +ee;, a D6otion to Conte;t )er;onal )ro*ert> 7ienE on a -u;tice Court
+orm. See NRS (!.2%F7?. "he tenant ma> al;o ;ue +or actual damage; and *uniti:e damage; u* to G1,!!! i+ the landlord
hold; the tenantB; *ro*ert> in an e++ort to en;ure that the tenant *a>; rent. See NRS 1184.2!.

4*at is t*e deadline in w*ic* a Motion to Contest $ersonal $ropert. ien m+st &e filed0

"he motion mu;t He +iled Aithin 2! calendar da>; a+ter the one +olloAing e:ent; that ha; occurred the late;t :

1. "he order +or e:iction Aa; i;;ued8
2. "he tenant :acated or Aa; remo:ed8 or
%. 4 co*> o+ the landlordB; charge; relating to the ;torage o+ the *ro*ert> ha;
Heen reKue;ted H> or *ro:ided to the tenant. See NRS (!.2%F7?

4*en m+st t*e *earing on t*e Motion &e sc*ed+led0

"he court mu;t ;chedule a hearing Aithin 1! Ludicial da>; a+ter the +iling o+ the motion. See NRS (!.2%F8?


M+st t*e Motion &e ser3ed +pon t*e landlord0

"he court i; reKuired to a++i' the date o+ the hearing to the motion and order a co*> ;er:ed u*on the landlord H> the
;heri++, con;taHle or other *roce;; ;er:er. See NRS (!.2%F8?

4*at will t*e 7+dge do at t*e *earing0

4t the hearing, the court ma> determine the co;t;, i+ an>, claimed H> the landlord and order the tenantB; *ro*ert> relea;ed
Aith or Aithout the *a>ment o+ tho;e co;t;.

Sec+rit. Deposits

How large a sec+rit. deposit ma. t*e landlord of a residential propert. re/+est0

No more than % month; o+ rent. NRS 1184.2(2F1?

%,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ma. a tenant post a s+ret. &ond instead of a sec+rit. deposit0

5e;, i+ all *artie; agree. /+ the landlord maIe; claim again;t the Hond the tenant mu;t He gi:en an itemiJed Aritten
accounting recei:ed +rom the landlord. "he tenant ma> ;end a Aritten re;*on;e di;*uting an> item; to the ;uret>. "he
;uret> cannot re*ort a landlordB; claim to a credit re*orting agenc> unle;; the ;uret> +ir;t ;ue; the tenant and oHtain; a
Ludgment.

3oA doe; a tenant *ro:e that he *aid a ;ecurit> de*o;itC

"he landlord i; reKuired to deli:er to the tenant, u*on hi; reKue;t, a ;igned Aritten recei*t +or the ;ecurit> de*o;it Fa; Aell
a; +or an> other *a>ment;, including rent?.
NRS 1184.2!

4*at if t*e landlord will not gi3e t*e tenant a receipt for t*e sec+rit. deposit0

"he tenant ma> re+u;e to maIe rent *a>ment; until the landlord *ro:ide; the reKue;ted recei*t. NRS 1184.2!

M+st t*e landlord ret+rn t*e sec+rit. deposit0

Not nece;;aril>. "he landlord ma> deduct +rom the ;ecurit> de*o;it ;uch amount; a; are nece;;ar> to:

1. Remed> an> de+ault in the *a>ment o+ the rent8
2. Re*air damage; to the *remi;e; cau;ed H> the tenant, other than Dnormal Aear and tear8E and
%. )a> the rea;onaHle co;t; o+ cleaning the *remi;e;. NRS 1184.2(2F2? and F?





4*at is 8normal wear and tear90

DNormal Aear and tearE i; the Iind o+ deterioration Ahich occur; Aithout negligence, carele;;ne;; or aHu;e o+ the
*remi;e;. Normal Aear and tear include; deterioration o+ the *remi;e; that occur; during normal condition;. &or e'am*le,
*aint ma> +ade, electrical ;Aitche; ma> Aear out and HreaI, *ull ;tring; on Hlind; ma> +ra> or HreaI , car*et and tile ma>
Aear doAn. "he;e thing; ha**en e:en i+ the tenant clean; regularl> and care; +or the *remi;e; rea;onaHl>. NRS 1184.11!


4*en m+st t*e landlord ret+rn t*e sec+rit. deposit to t*e tenant0
(,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

.*on termination o+ the tenanc> H> either *art> +or an> rea;on, including e:iction, the landlord mu;t return the de*o;it to
the tenant, or *ro:ide an itemiJed Aritten accounting ;hoAing hoA the de*o;it Aa; u;ed, no later than %! da>; a+ter the
termination o+ the tenanc>. NRS 1184.2(2F2?

4*at if t*e landlord fails to ret+rn t*e sec+rit. deposit wit*in 5) da.s or t*e tenant disagrees wit* t*e wa. in
w*ic* t*e sec+rit. deposit was +sed0

"he tenant ma> ;ue the landlord and reKue;t u* to tAice the amount o+ the ;ecurit> de*o;it. 4 tenant Aho *aid their
de*o;it H> *urcha;ing a ;uret> Hond, and,or a tenant Aho di;agree; Aith the Aa> in Ahich the landlord u;ed the ;ecurit>
de*o;it ma> ;end a Aritten re;*on;e to the ;uret>. /+ the tenant ;end; thi; re;*on;e Aithin %! da>; a+ter recei:ing an
itemiJed Aritten accounting +rom the landlord, the ;uret> i; not to re*ort the landlordB; claim to a credit re*orting agenc>
Aithout +ir;t oHtaining a Ludgment again;t the tenant. Securit> De*o;it; and 9uarantie; .nder
7ea;e;, 1 R047 )R1). )R1<. M "R. -. (!, (! F19$$? Fciting %2 46. -.R. 7andlord and "enant
N $( F19(1?8 2 46. -.R. 7andlord and "enant N $! F19(7?8 9 4.7.R. %!! F192!??8 ;ee al;o
Rand> 9. 9erchicI, No 0a;> 2a> 1ut: 6aIing the Summar> 0:iction )roce;; a &airer and
6ore 0++icient 4lternati:e to 7andlord Sel+#3el*, (1 .C74 7. R0V. 79, 77 F199(?.
"he under;igned hereH> +le; thi; +or the aHo:e rea;on;, taIing i;;ue, ;*eci+icall>, Aith the +olloAing
a;*ect; o+ thi; Court@; 1rder o+ DecemHer 21, 2!11. 1ne G(8! i; not rea;onaHle +or a ;torage co;t. 4
1! +oot H> %! +oot ;torage ;hed in 2a;hoe Count> goe; +or aHout G1!, not G(8!. "Ao, the *aucit>
o+ time gi:en in the order +or Hoth the in:entor>ing and +or the mo:ing it;el+ Aa; Aholl> in;u++icient.
"he under;igned *aid the G(8! under the 1rder, he ;hould ha:e rea;onaHle o**ortunit> to get Ahat i;
hi;, and not ha:e the inter+erence run H> 3ill and <aIer detailed in 0'hiHit 1. &urther, the
under;igned made aHundantl> clear at the hearing o+ 12,2!,11 that he Aa; not in agreement Aith the
term; Dre;ol:edE in the Court@; 12,21,11 1rder and that the under;igned Aa; not entering a ;ettlement
agreement, etc., etc. "he recorded audio o+ that hearing Aill maIe that aHundantl> clear. &urther, the
R-C@; <aili++@; Re>e; and Se'ton continued their Hull>ing ina**ro*riate Heha:ior at the hearing FhoA
the Aritten com*laint; again;t tho;e tAo Haili++@; H> the under;igned related to their
threatening,;e'ual a;;ault; did not nece;;iate *utting a di++erent Haili++ in the court at the hearing i;
not clear at all. 4dditionall>, Richard 3ill re#entered the courtroom on 12,2!,11, de;*ite the court
,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
telling Aitne;;e; liIe him;el+ to lea:e....onl> to ha:e Richard 3ill re*eat the threat; made H> <aili++
Re>e; to the under;igned, Aith 3ill indicating to the under;igned and the other; a;;emHled that he
Aanted to *ut hi; +oot u* the under;igned@; a;; a; Aell. "he under;igned ;hould immediatel> He
granted additional time to retrie:e Ahat *ro*ert> o+ hi; remain; at 121 Ri:er RocI 89!1. &urther,
the 1rder o+ 12,21,11, to the e'tent it remain; in e++ect and i; not o:ertunred, ha; a re; Ludicata, laA
o+ the ca;e, claim or i;;ue *reclu;ion e++ect a; to an> o+ the re;er:ation; the 1rder o+ 12,21,11
mention; aHout: D )lainti++ re;er:e; all claim; o+ an> nature including, Hut not limited to, additional
;torage +ee; +rom No:emHer 17, 2!11 u* until DecemHer 2%,2!11 , damage; to the *ro*ert> allegedl>
cau;ed H> the De+endant, di;*o;al co;t; o+ an> *ro*ert> le+t Hehind, attorne>@; +ee; and co;t; to the
e'tent legall alloAed H> ;tatute or ca;e laA.E &urther, there i; no Ha;i; under Ne:ada laA +or ;uch an
aAard o+ +ee;, nor ha; 3ill or <aIer *ro:ided an> citation +or di;*o;al co;t;, *artiuclarl> Ahere there
inter+erence re;ulted in the *re:ention o+ the remo:al o+ *ro*ert> a; detailed in 0'hiHit 1. "enant;
Aere entitled to a *reliminar> inLunction re;training landlord; +rom en+orcing the *ro:i;ion; o+
Ne:ada@; landlord lien laA; in;o+ar a; the> authoriJed ;eiJure and ;ale o+ the tenant;@ *ro*ert>
Aithout *rior notice and hearing8 hoAe:er, under the circum;tance; di;clo;ed o+ record, the
re;toration o+ tenant;@ *ro*ert> Aould He ;ta>ed until the landlord; had a rea;onaHle o**ortunit> to
re;ol:e the Kue;tion o+ Ahat to return to Ahich o+ the tenant;, Aho had ;e*arated and Aere in:ol:ed
in a di:orce *roceeding. N.R.S. (!.21 et ;eK., 1!8.1! et ;eK. 4dam; :. -o;e*h &. San;on /n:. Co.,
197(, %7$ &.Su**. $1. Court;
"he Court 1rdered:
$,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3a:ing con;idered the e:idence *re;ented to thi; *oint and the *artie; ha:ing
agreed to alloA the Court to enter an order Ha;ed on ;aid e:idence, the Court +ind;
that G(8!.!! i; +air and rea;onaHle com*en;ation +or ;torage o+ the *er;onal
*ro*ert> o+ the De+endant +or the *eriod o+ No:emHer 1, 2!11 to No:emHer 1$,
2!11. <a;ed u*on the +oregoing, the Court hereH> enter; the +olloAing 1rder: 1.
"hat the De+endant, Zachar> Coughl in, ;hall *a> the ;um o+ G(8!.!! in certi+ied
+und; to the )lainti++ at the 7aA 1++ice; o+ Ca;e> <aIer on or He+ore 2edne;da>,
DecemHer 21,2! 11 at (:!! *.m. 2. "he )lainti ++ ;hall ha:e the right to :ideota*e
the *remi;e; +rom 9:!! a.m. to :!! *.m. on "hur;da>, DecemHer 22, 2! 11 and
;aid :ideo ;hall include *er;onal and real *ro*ert>8 hoAe:er, the> ;hall not
identi+> an> *er;onal in +ormation o+ an> client; o+ the De+endant@; laA *ractice.
/n addition, the )lainti++, H> hi; attorne>; or other authoriJed re*re;.entati:e, ;hall
ha:e the right to :ideota*e the *ro*ert> +olloAing the remo:al H> the De+endant o+
hi; *er;onal *ro*ert>, Ahich ;hall occur on or He+ore :!! *.m. on DecemHer 2% ,
2!11. "he *ur*o;e o+ the :ideo i; to determine Ahether there i; an> damage to the
real or *er;onal *ro*ert> o+ the )lainti++, Ahich ;hall include all +i'ture; and
a**liance; that Helong to the )lainti++. /n addition, the :ideo ;hall He u;ed to :eri+>
Ahat *ro*ert>, i+ an>, i; le+t on the *remi;e; H> the De+endant. %. 4n>thing and
e:er>thing le+t on the *ro*ert> a+ter :!! *.m. on &rida>, DecemHer 2%,2!11 , ma>
He di;*o;ed o+ H> the )lainti++ in hi; ;ole di;cretion. (. De+endant ;hall ha:e
acce;; to the *ro*ert> +rom 9:!! a.m. to :!! *.m. on "hur;da>, DecemHer
22,2!11 , to :ideota*e, i+he de;ire;, the real and *er;onal *ro*ert> and to remo:e
hi; *ro*ert> +rom the *remi;e;. /n addition, the De+endant ;hall ha:e +rom 9:!!
a.m. to :!! *.m. on &rida>, DecemHer 2%,2!11 to :ideota*e and remo:e hi;
*ro*ert> +rom the *remi;e;. 4cce;; Aill He *ro:ided H> a re*re;entati:e o+ the
landlord, Aho Aill unlocI the *ro*ert> at 9:!! a.m. and locI the *ro*ert> at :!!
*.m. on Hoth da>;. . "he 7andlord ;hall ha:e no liaHilit> +or an> inLurie; ;u++ered
H> De+endant or an>one el;e during ;aid remo:al *roce;;, e'ce*t +or an intentional
tort committed H> the )lainti++ or hi; re*re;entati:e; again;t the *er;on o+ the
De+endant and, liIeAi;e, the De+endant ;hall ha:e no liaHilit> +or an> inLur> to the
*er;on o+ the )lainti++or hi; agent;, e'ce*t +or an intentional tort H> the De+endant.
&urther, an>one the De+endant authoriJe; to He on the *remi;e; during the *eriod
"hur;da>, DecemHer 22nd , +rom 9:!! a.m. to :!! *.m. and &rida>, DecemHer
2%rd , +rom 9:!! a.m. to :!! *.m. ;hall ;ign the Relea;e o+ 7i aHilit>, attached
hereto a; 0'hiHit 4. /+ an> third *art> i; on the *remi;e; Aithout ;igning the
Aai:er, the> ;hall He tre;*a;;er; and the )lainti++ or hi; agent; can ha:e them
remo:ed H> laA en+o rcement. $. "he De+endant ;hall not cau;e an> damage to the
real *ro*ert> or *er;onal *ro*ert> o+ the )lainti++ located at 121 Ri:er RocI, Reno,
e:ada, +rom thi; date +orAard. "he Court Aill retain Luri;diction o:er the i;;ue o+
an> damage; cau;ed to the real *ro*ert> or *er;onal *ro*ert> o+ the landlord
during the remo:al *roce;;. 7. "he De+endant ;hall ha:e no claim +or damage;
Aith re;*ect to mi;;ing or damaged *er;onal *ro*ert> at 121 Ri:er RocI, e'ce*t
+or *ro*ert> identi+ied H> him, in Ariting, H> 11 :!! a.m. on "hur;da>, DecemHer
22,2! 11 H> email to 6r. <aIer, Aith a co*> to the Court. "he De+endant re;er:e;
an> other claim; he ha; that ma> not in:ol:e hi; *er;onal *ro*ert> located at the
7,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
*remi;e; to the e'tent legall> alloAed H> ;tatute or ca;e laA. 8. "he )lainti++
re;er:e; all claim; o+ an> nature including, Hut not limited to, additional ;torage
+ee; +rom No:emHer 17, 2!11 u* until DecemHer 2%,2!11 , damage; to the
*ro*ert> allegedl> cau;ed H> the De+endant, di;*o;al co;t; o+ an> *ro*ert> le+t
Hehind, attorne>@; +ee; and co;t; to the e'tent legall alloAed H> ;tatute or ca;e laA.
9ould :. 2i;e, 18 Ne:. 2%, % ). %! F188(? O 2!PaQ -one; :. 1@&arrel, 1 Ne:. %(, 18$ 27 1!8
F18$? O 2!PHQ Reno )lumHing M 3eating Co. :. <icIel, Ne:. %$7, % ).2d %!2 F19%(? O 7PHQ,
(!PHQ NRS (!.(!! Rule; o+ *ractice. "he *ro:i;ion; o+ NRS, Ne:ada Rule; o+ Ci:il )rocedure and
Ne:ada Rule; o+ 4**ellate )rocedure relati:e to ci:il action;, a**eal; and neA trial;, ;o +ar a; the>
are not incon;i;tent Aith the *ro:i;ion; o+ NRS (!.22! to (!.(2!, inclu;i:e, a**l> to the *roceeding;
mentioned in tho;e ;ection;.
State :. -one;, 917 ).2d 2!!, 2!9R, 18 4riJ. (71, (8!R F4riJ. 6a> !7, 199$? FN1. CR#9%#!(1#4)?
2 6a;on :. Schumacher, (%9 N.2.2d $1, 7!, 2%1 NeH. 929, 9((, 8( 4.7.R.(th 1$%, 1$% FNeH. 4*r
27, 1989? FN1. 87#19(? % Countr>Aide 3ome 7oan;, /nc. :. "hitchener, 192 ).%d 2(%, 28, 12( Ne:.
72, 7(8 FNe:. Se* 11, 2!!8? FN1. ($(99? Secondar> Source; F..S.4.? ( 4DD/N9 /N-.R5 "1
/N-.R5: /N4D0S.4"0 )R1"0C"/1N 1& "0N4N"S@ )R1)0R"5 D.R/N9 0V/C"/1N 4ND
"30 N00D &1R R0&1R6, 2! 7o>. Con;umer 7. Re:. 2(7, 2$9 F2!!8? 6otion to Conte;t
)er;onal *ro*ert> 7ien and +or Return o+ )er;onal )ro*ert> FFFF2!?, 2!!$ 27 (%8%( FState
e+orm;?, T1 F2!!$? Court Document; 4**ellate Court Document; F..S.4.? 4**ellate <rie+; $
C1.N"R52/D0 3160 714NS, /NC., a NeA 5orI Cor*oration, 4**ellant, Cro;;#Re;*ondent, :.
9erald "3/"C30N0R8 =atrina "hitchener8 Ste:en 7amH8 and =aitl>n "hitchener,
Re;*ondent;,Cro;;#4**ellant;., 2!!7 27 $28(%%, T$28(%%R F4**ellate <rie+? FNe:. 1ct !%,
2!!7? Re;*ondent;, Cro;;#4**ellant;@ Re*l> <rie+ FN1. ($(99? 7 C1.N"R52/D0 3160
714NS, /NC., a NeA 5orI Cor*oration, 4**ellant, Cro;;#Re;*ondent, :. 9erald "3/"C30N0R8
8,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
=atrina "hitchener8 Ste:en 7amH8 and =aitl>n "hitchener, Re;*ondent;,Cro;;#4**ellant;., 2!!7 27
$28(%2, T$28(%2R F4**ellate <rie+? FNe:. Se* 27, 2!!7? Countr>Aide@; Re*l> <rie+ on 4**eal
and 4n;Aering <rie+ on Cro;;#4**eal FN1. ($(99? 8 C1.N"R52/D0 3160 714NS, /NC., a
NeA 5orI Cor*oration, 4**ellant, Cro;;#Re;*ondent, :. 9erald "3/"C30N0R8 =atrina "hitchener8
Ste:en 7amH8 and =aitl>n "hitchener, Re;*ondent;,Cro;;#4**ellant;., 2!!7 27 $28(%1,
T$28(%1R F4**ellate <rie+? FNe:. -un 12, 2!!7? Re;*ondent;, U 2!11 "hom;on Reuter;. 4ll right;
re;er:ed. Cro;;#4**ellant;@ 4n;Aering <rie+ and 1*ening <rie+ FN1. ($(99? 9 Cal:in 2/NC3077,
and indi:idual dHa, a.H.a. C97 Sea+ood, /nc., 4**ellant, Cro;; Re;*ondent, :. Renate SC3/&&,
"ru;tee, Schi++ )ro*ertie;, Re;*ondent, Cro;; 4**ellant., 2!!$ 27 $282(9!, T$282(9!R F4**ellate
<rie+? FNe:. 1ct %1, 2!!$? 4**ellant@; 1*ening <rie+ FN1. (7!$7? "rial Court Document; F..S.4.?
"rial )leading; 1! /n Re: 460R/C4N 7/<0R"5 <4/7 <1NDS, /NC. a Ne:ada Cor*oration,
DeHtor. RoHert <.6etJ, )lainti++, :. 4merican 7iHert> <ail <ond;, /nc. -ohn =. 0lli;, De+endant.,
2!!2 27 %2779992, T%2779992R F"rial )leading? F<anIr.D.Ne:. Se* !(, 2!!2? Com*laint
1HLecting to Di;chargeaHil1t> o+ DeHt under 11 ..S.C. VV 2% Fa?F(?, Fa?F$? FN1. <=#N#!2#127#
92Z? "rial 6otion;, 6emoranda and 4++ida:it; 11 RoHert <. 60"Z, 4**ellant, :. 460R/C4N
7/<0R"5 <4/7 <1NDS, /NC., -ohn =. 0lli;, 4merican 7iHert> /n:e;tment;, /nc. 4**ellee., 2!!
27 %7$$%2%, T%7$$%2% F"rial 6otion, 6emorandum and 4++ida:it? FD.Ne:. &eH 11, 2!!? 1*ening
<rie+ o+ 4**ellant, RoHert <. 6etJ FN1. CV#N#!(#!1!#7R3, V)C? 12 9erald "3/"C30N0R,
indi:iduall>8 =atrina "hitchener, indi:iduall>8 =atrina "hitchener a; 9uardian 4d 7item +or Ste:en
7amH8 and =atrina "hitchener a; 9uardian 4d 7item +or =aitl>n "hitchener, )lainti++;, :.
C1.N"R52/D0 3160 714NS, /NC., a NeA 5orI cor*oration8 Doe; / through V, inclu;i:e8 and
Roe cor*oration;, / through V, inclu;i:e, De+endant;., 2!! 27 $2277((, T$2277((R F"rial 6otion,
6emorandum and 4++ida:it? FNe:.Di;t.Ct. &eH 22, 2!!? )lainti++;@ 1**o;ition to De+endant@;
9,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6otion +or )artial Summar> -udgment Den>ing )uniti:e Damage; FN1. 4(7997? 1% &rederic
4)C4R, an indi:idual, )lainti++, :. -ame; R.<</C1, an indi:idual, De+endant8 -ame; RuHHico, an
indi:idual, Counterclaimant, :. &rederic 4*car, an indi:idual, Counterde+endant., 2!!( 27 %%2218,
T%%2218 F"rial 6otion, 6emorandum and 4++ida:it? FNe:.Di;t.Ct. Se* 28, 2!!(? 1**o;ition to
6otion +or Summar> -udgment H> -ame; RuHHico FN1. 4(7$82%? Statute; and Court Rule; F..S.4.?
1( NV S" (!.2%8 (!.2%. .nlaA+ul detainer: Su**lemental remed> o+ ;ummar> e:iction and
e'clu;ion o+ tenant +or de+ault in *a>ment o+ rent 1 NV S" 1184.(!8 1184
NRC) R.70 9. N02 "R/47S8 460ND60N" 1& -.D960N"S "e't Fa? 9round;. 4 neA trial
ma> He granted to all or an> o+ the *artie; and on all or *art o+ the i;;ue; +or an> o+ the +olloAing
cau;e; or ground; materiall> a++ecting the ;uH;tantial right; o+ an aggrie:ed *art>: F1? /rregularit> in
the *roceeding; o+ the court, Lur>, ma;ter, or ad:er;e *art>, or an> order o+ the court, or ma;ter, or
aHu;e o+ di;cretion H> Ahich either *art> Aa; *re:ented +rom ha:ing a +air trial8 F2? 6i;conduct o+
the Lur> or *re:ailing *art>8 F%? 4ccident or ;ur*ri;e Ahich ordinar> *rudence could not ha:e guarded
again;t8 F(? NeAl> di;co:ered e:idence material +or the *art> maIing the motion Ahich the *art>
could not, Aith rea;onaHle diligence, ha:e di;co:ered and *roduced at the trial8 F? 6ani+e;t
di;regard H> the Lur> o+ the in;truction; o+ the court8 F$? 0'ce;;i:e damage; a**earing to ha:e Heen
gi:en under the in+luence o+ *a;;ion or *reLudice8 or, F7? 0rror in laA occurring at the trial and
oHLected to H> the *art> maIing the motion. 1n a motion +or a neA trial in an action tried Aithout a
Lur>, the court ma> o*en the Ludgment i+ one ha; Heen entered, taIe additional te;timon>, amend
1!,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
+inding; o+ +act and conclu;ion; o+ laA or maIe neA +inding; and conclu;ion;, and direct the entr> o+
a neA Ludgment. P4; amended8 e++ecti:e -anuar> 1, 2!!.Q FH? "ime +or 6otion. 4 motion +or a neA
trial ;hall He +iled no later than 1! da>; a+ter ;er:ice o+ Aritten notice o+ the entr> o+ the Ludgment.
P4; amended8 e++ecti:e -anuar> 1, 2!!.Q Fc? "ime +or Ser:ing 4++ida:it;. 2hen a motion +or neA
trial i; Ha;ed u*on a++ida:it; the> ;hall He +iled Aith the motion. "he o**o;ing *art> ha; 1! da>; a+ter
;er:ice Aithin Ahich to +ile o**o;ing a++ida:it;, Ahich *eriod ma> He e'tended +or an additional
*eriod not e'ceeding 2! da>; either H> the court +or good cau;e ;hoAn or H> the *artie; H> Aritten
;ti*ulation. "he court ma> *ermit re*l> a++ida:it;. P4; amended8 e++ecti:e -anuar> 1, 2!!.Q Fd? 1n
CourtB; /nitiati:e8 Notice8 S*eci+>ing 9round;. No later than 1! da>; a+ter entr> o+ Ludgment the
court, on it; oAn, ma> order a neA trial +or an> rea;on that Aould Lu;ti+> granting one on a *art>B;
motion. 4+ter gi:ing the *artie; notice and an o**ortunit> to He heard, the court ma> grant a timel>
motion +or a neA trial +or a rea;on not ;tated in the motion. 2hen granting a neA trial on it; oAn
initiati:e or +or a rea;on not ;tated in a motion, the court ;hall ;*eci+> the ground; in it; order.
P4dded8 e++ecti:e -anuar> 1, 2!!.Q Fe? 6otion to 4lter or 4mend a -udgment. 4 motion to alter or
amend the Ludgment ;hall He +iled no later than 1! da>; a+ter ;er:ice o+ Aritten notice o+ entr> o+ the
Ludgment. R.70 $!. R07/0& &R16 -.D960N" 1R 1RD0R "e't Fa? Clerical 6i;taIe;. Clerical
mi;taIe; in Ludgment;, order; or other *art; o+ the record and error; therein ari;ing +rom o:er;ight or
omi;;ion ma> He corrected H> the court at an> time o+ it; oAn initiati:e or on the motion o+ an> *art>
and a+ter ;uch notice, i+ an>, a; the court order;. During the *endenc> o+ an a**eal, ;uch mi;taIe;
ma> He ;o corrected He+ore the a**eal i; docIeted in the a**ellate court, and therea+ter Ahile the
a**eal i; *ending ma> He ;o corrected Aith lea:e o+ the a**ellate court. FH? 6i;taIe;8 /nad:ertence8
0'cu;aHle Neglect8 NeAl> Di;co:ered 0:idence8 &raud, 0tc. 1n motion and u*on ;uch term; a; are
Lu;t, the court ma> relie:e a *art> or a *art>B; legal re*re;entati:e +rom a +inal Ludgment, order, or
11,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
*roceeding +or the +olloAing rea;on;: F1? mi;taIe, inad:ertence, ;ur*ri;e, or e'cu;aHle neglect8 F2?
neAl> di;co:ered e:idence Ahich H> due diligence could not ha:e Heen di;co:ered in time to mo:e
+or a neA trial under Rule 9FH?8 F%? +raud FAhether hereto+ore denominated intrin;ic or e'trin;ic?,
mi;re*re;entation or other mi;conduct o+ an ad:er;e *art>8 F(? the Ludgment i; :oid8 or, F? the
Ludgment ha; Heen ;ati;+ied, relea;ed, or di;charged, or a *rior Ludgment u*on Ahich it i; Ha;ed ha;
Heen re:er;ed or otherAi;e :acated, or it i; no longer eKuitaHle that an inLunction ;hould ha:e
*ro;*ecti:e a**lication. "he motion ;hall He made Aithin a rea;onaHle time, and +or rea;on; F1?, F2?,
and F%? not more than $ month; a+ter the *roceeding Aa; taIen or the date that Aritten notice o+ entr>
o+ the Ludgment or order Aa; ;er:ed. 4 motion under thi; ;uHdi:i;ion FH? doe; not a++ect the +inalit>
o+ a Ludgment or ;u;*end it; o*eration. "hi; rule doe; not limit the *oAer o+ a court to entertain an
inde*endent action to relie:e a *art> +rom a Ludgment, order, or *roceeding, or to ;et a;ide a
Ludgment +or +raud u*on the court. 2rit; o+ coram noHi;, coram :oHi;, audita Kuerela, and Hill; o+
re:ieA and Hill; in the nature o+ a Hill o+ re:ieA, are aHoli;hed, and the *rocedure +or oHtaining an>
relie+ +rom a Ludgment ;hall He H> motion a; *re;criHed in the;e rule; or H> an inde*endent action.
P4; amended8 e++ecti:e -anuar> 1, 2!!.Q Fc? De+ault -udgment;: De+endant Not )er;onall> Ser:ed.
2hen a de+ault Ludgment ;hall ha:e Heen taIen again;t an> *art> Aho Aa; not *er;onall> ;er:ed Aith
;ummon; and com*laint, either in the State o+ Ne:ada or in an> other Luri;diction, and Aho ha; not
entered a general a**earance in the action, the court, a+ter notice to the ad:er;e *art>, u*on motion
made Aithin $ month; a+ter the date o+ ;er:ice o+ Aritten notice o+ entr> o+ ;uch Ludgment, ma>
:acate ;uch Ludgment and alloA the *art> or the *art>B; legal re*re;entati:e; to an;Aer to the merit;
o+ the original action. 2hen, hoAe:er, a *art> ha; Heen *er;onall> ;er:ed Aith ;ummon; and
com*laint, either in the State o+ Ne:ada or in an> other Luri;diction, the *art> mu;t maIe a**lication
to He relie:ed +rom a de+ault, a Ludgment, an order, or other *roceeding taIen again;t the *art>, or +or
12,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
*ermi;;ion to +ile an an;Aer, in accordance Aith the *ro:i;ion; o+ ;uHdi:i;ion FH? o+ thi; rule. P4;
amended8 e++ecti:e -anuar> 1, 2!!.Q Fd? De+ault -udgment;: 6odi+ication Nunc )ro "unc. 2hene:er
a de+ault Ludgment or decree ha; Heen entered, the *art> or *artie; in de+ault therein ma> at an> time
therea+ter, u*on Aritten con;ent o+ the *art> or *artie; in Aho;e +a:or Ludgment or decree ha; Heen
entered, enter general a**earance in the action, and the general a**earance ;o entered ;hall ha:e the
;ame +orce and e++ect a; i+ entered at the *ro*er time *rior to the rendition o+ the Ludgment or decree.
1n ;uch a**earance Heing entered the court ma> maIe and enter a modi+ied Ludgment or decree to
the e'tent onl> o+ ;hoAing ;uch general a**earance on the *art o+ the *art> or *artie; in de+ault, and
it ;hall He entered nunc *ro tunc a; o+ the date o+ the original Ludgment or decree8 *ro:ided, hoAe:er,
that nothing herein contained ;hall *re:ent the court +rom modi+>ing ;uch Ludgment or decree a;
;ti*ulated and agreed in Ariting H> the *artie; to ;uch action, and in accordance Aith the term; o+
;uch Aritten ;ti*ulation and agreement.
. Nothing in 6erli;;,3ill; ridiculou; 6otion to ShoA Cau;e i; admitted, e:er>thing i; o**o;ed.
3ill maIe; Ha;ele;; allegation; o+ the under;igned Dl>ingE >et he ne:er get; around to *ointing out
Ahat e'actl> i; a lie, <aIer doe; the ;ame.
"he under;igned hereH> de*o;ited G2! Aith the Reno -u;tice Court, Ahereu*on NRS (!.%8
reKuire; a ;ta> He granted, unle;; the R-C Aant; to ;a> Coughlin i; a commercial tenant, in Ahich
ca;e, a Summar> 0:iction )roceeding Aa; im*ermi;;iHle Ahere onl> a No Cau;e 0:iction Notice
Aa; +iled. /& there i; amHiguit> in the lea;e, ;ummar> Ludgment i; not a**ro*riate, i;;ue o+ laA and
+act not Aell ;uited to ;ummar> *roceeding;.
1%,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"he under;igned NRS (!.%8! )ro:i;ion; go:erning a**eal;. 0ither *art> ma>, Aithin 1! da>;,
a**eal +rom the Ludgment rendered. <ut an a**eal H> the de+endant ;hall not ;ta> the e'ecution o+ the
Ludgment, unle;;, Aithin the 1! da>;, the de+endant ;hall e'ecute and +ile Aith the court or Lu;tice the
de+endantB; undertaIing to the *lainti++, Aith tAo or more ;uretie;, in an amount to He +i'ed H> the
court or Lu;tice, Hut Ahich ;hall not He le;; than tAice the amount o+ the Ludgment and co;t;, to the
e++ect that, i+ the Ludgment a**ealed +rom He a++irmed or the a**eal He di;mi;;ed, the a**ellant Aill
*a> the Ludgment and the co;t o+ a**eal, the :alue o+ the u;e and occu*ation o+ the *ro*ert>, and
damage; Lu;tl> accruing to the *lainti++ during the *endenc> o+ the a**eal. .*on taIing the a**eal
and +iling the undertaIing, all +urther *roceeding; in the ca;e ;hall He ;ta>ed.
NRS (!.%8 Sta> o+ e'ecution u*on a**eal8 dut> o+ tenant Aho retain; *o;;e;;ion o+ *remi;e; to
*a> rent during ;ta>. .*on an a**eal +rom an order entered *ur;uant to NRS (!.2%:
1. 0'ce*t a; otherAi;e *ro:ided in thi; ;uH;ection, a ;ta> o+ e'ecution ma> He oHtained H> +iling
Aith the trial court a Hond in the amount o+ G2! to co:er the e'*ected co;t; on a**eal. /n an action
concerning a lea;e o+ commercial *ro*ert> or an> other *ro*ert> +or Ahich the monthl> rent e'ceed;
G1,!!!, the court ma>, u*on it; oAn motion or that o+ a *art>, and u*on a ;hoAing o+ good cau;e,
order an additional Hond to He *o;ted to co:er the e'*ected co;t; on a**eal. 4 ;uret> u*on the Hond
;uHmit; to the Luri;diction o+ the a**ellate court and irre:ocaHl> a**oint; the clerI o+ that court a; the
;uret>B; agent u*on Ahom *a*er; a++ecting the ;uret>B; liaHilit> u*on the Hond ma> He ;er:ed.
7iaHilit> o+ a ;uret> ma> He en+orced, or the Hond ma> He relea;ed, on motion in the a**ellate court
Aithout inde*endent action.
1(,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2. 4 tenant Aho retain; *o;;e;;ion o+ the *remi;e; that are the ;uHLect o+ the a**eal during the
*endenc> o+ the a**eal ;hall *a> to the landlord rent in the amount *ro:ided in the underl>ing
contract HetAeen the tenant and the landlord a; it Hecome; due. /+ the tenant +ail; to *a> ;uch rent, the
landlord ma> initiate neA *roceeding; +or a ;ummar> e:iction H> ;er:ing the tenant Aith a neA
notice *ur;uant to NRS (!.2%.
0;taHli;hing :alue o+ *ro*ert> con:erted: Commercial tenant Aa; entitled to :alue o+ certain item;
o+ *er;onal *ro*ert> lo;t during cour;e o+ Arong+ul e:iction, de;*ite lacI o+ documentation ;hoAing
the e'act *rice *aid, Ahere te;timon> o+ tenant@; *rinci*al, Aho Aa; al;o a certi+ied *uHlic
accountant, a; to the article; o+ eKui*ment *urcha;ed and their *rice; and the documentar> e:idence
a; to their re;ale :alue three >ear; a+ter their *urcha;e, Aa; unreHutted H> landlord;, and no *roo+ Aa;
adduced to ;hoA that the article; Aere not in +act *urcha;ed or that their :alue had Heen in+lated.
North 6ain Street <agel Cor*. :. Duncan, %7 4.D.%d 78, 8%1 N.5.S.2d 2%9 F2d De*@t 2!!7?8 2e;t@;
=e> NumHer Dige;t, 7andlord and "enant 278. P"o* o+ SectionQ P0ND 1& S.))7060N"Q /V.
61D07 )704D/N9S N %7. 9eneral +orm o+ com*laint alleging landlord@; con:er;ion o+ tenant;@;
*er;onal *ro*ert> "he +olloAing i; a general +orm o+ com*laint +or a tenant@; action ;eeIing damage;
+or a landlord@; con:er;ion o+ the tenant@; *er;onal *ro*ert>: P"itle o+ court and ca;e name omitted.Q
C16)74/N" )lainti++, P*lainti++ tenantQ, H> Aa> o+ com*laint again;t the De+endant, Pde+endant
landlordQ, ;a>;: 1. )lainti++ re;ide; at Paddre;;Q, PCit>Q, PCount>Q, PStateQ. 2. De+endant re;ide; at
Paddre;;Q, PCit>Q, PCount>Q, PStateQ. %. &rom PdateQ to PdateQ, *lainti++ occu*ied, a; de+endant@; tenant,
de+endant@; hou;e located at Paddre;;Q, PCit>Q, PCount>Q, PStateQ. (. 1n PdateQ, de+endant terminated
the tenanc>, reentered the hou;e, and tooI *o;;e;;ion o+ the hou;e and all o+ *lainti++@; *er;onal
*ro*ert>. . 1n that date, the +olloAing item; o+ *er;onal *ro*ert> in the hou;e Aere oAned ;olel> H>
1,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
*lainti++: Pli;t *lainti++@; *ro*ert>Q. "he rea;onaHle :alue o+ the *ro*ert> on that date Aa; Pdollar
amountQ. $. 4t the time de+endant tooI *o;;e;;ion o+ the hou;e, *lainti++ attem*ted to remo:e the
*er;onal *ro*ert> +rom the hou;e, Hut de+endant Arong+ull> re+u;ed to *ermit ;uch remo:al and
unlaA+ull> con:erted the *er;onal *ro*ert> to de+endant@; oAn u;e. )lainti++ ha; demanded that
de+endant *ermit *lainti++@; remo:al o+ *lainti++@; *er;onal *ro*ert> +rom the hou;e, or ;urrender
*o;;e;;ion o+ the *er;onal *ro*ert> to *lainti++, Hut de+endant, Aith Aill+ul di;regard o+ *lainti++@;
legal right to *o;;e;;ion o+ the *er;onal *ro*ert>, ha; re+u;ed and +ailed either to *ermit *lainti++ to
remo:e it +rom the hou;e or to ;urrender it; *o;;e;;ion to *lainti++ and ;till re+u;e; to do ;o. 7. <>
rea;on o+ de+endant@; Aill+ul con:er;ion o+ the *ro*ert> o+ *lainti++, Aith InoAledge o+ *lainti++@;
oAner;hi*, and Aithout regard to *lainti++@; legal right to it; *o;;e;;ion, *lainti++ i; entitled to
com*en;ator> damage; in the amount o+ Pdollar amountQ and e'em*lar> damage; in the amount o+
Pdollar amountQ +rom de+endant. 230R0&1R0, *lainti++ reKue;t;: 1. -udgment again;t de+endant +or
com*en;ator> damage; in the amount o+ Pdollar amountQ8 2. -udgment again;t de+endant +or
e'em*lar> damage; in the amount o+ Pdollar amountQ8 %. 4Aard to *lainti++ o+ co;t; o+ thi;
*roceeding8 and (. Such other and +urther relie+ a; the court ma> deem Lu;t and *ro*er. PName o+
7aA &irmQ <5: PSignatureQ PName o+ 4ttorne>Q Dated: N %8. Com*laint ;eeIing com*en;ator> and
*uniti:e damage; +or landlord@; con:er;ion o+ tenant@; *er;onal *ro*ert> "he +olloAing i; an
illu;trati:e com*laint +or an action in Ahich a tenant i; ;eeIing com*en;ator> and *uniti:e damage;
+or a landlord@; con:er;ion o+ the tenant@; *er;onal *ro*ert>: P"itle o+ court and ca;e name omitted.Q
C16)74/N" )lainti++, P*lainti++ tenantQ, H> Aa> o+ com*laint again;t the De+endant, Pde+endant
landlordQ, ;a>;: 1. )lainti++ re;ide; at Paddre;;Q, PCit>Q, PCount>Q, PStateQ. 2. De+endant re;ide; at
Paddre;;Q, PCit>Q, PCount>Q, PStateQ. %. 4t the time; mentioned, de+endant oAned, managed, and
controlled the PnameQ <uilding, containing multi*le rental unit; +or re;idential *ur*o;e;, at Paddre;;Q,
1$,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PCit>Q, PCount>Q, PStateQ. (. 1n or aHout PdateQ, de+endant orall> agreed to lea;e to *lainti++ a*artment
PnumHerQ in the Huilding on a month#to#month Ha;i; at a rent o+ Pdollar amountQ, *a>aHle monthl> in
ad:ance on the Pidenti+> da> o+ each monthQ. . 1n PdateQ, *lainti++ *aid to de+endant Pdollar amountQ
+or the +ir;t month@; rent +or a*artment PnumHerQ and tooI *o;;e;;ion *ur;uant to the oral agreement.
$. 1n or aHout PdateQ, Ahile *lainti++ Aa; aH;ent +rom the a*artment, de+endant, Aithout notice to
*lainti++ and Aithout *lainti++@; con;ent, entered the a*artment, cau;ed the locI on the a*artment door
to He changed, and locIed *lainti++ out o+ the a*artment. &urther, de+endant remo:ed +rom, and
a**ro*riated *lainti++@; *er;onal *ro*ert> in, the a*artment and ad:i;ed *lainti++ that the *er;onal
*ro*ert> Aould not He returned unle;; *lainti++ *aid to de+endant an additional Pdollar amountQ. 7.
"he remo:al and a**ro*riation o+ *lainti++@; *er;onal *ro*ert>, ;uHLect to return on *lainti++@; *a>ment
o+ Pdollar amountQ, Aa; Aithout legal right and con;tituted a con:er;ion o+ *lainti++@; *ro*ert>. "he
rea;onaHle :alue o+ *lainti++@; *ro*ert> ;o con:erted H> de+endant i; Pdollar amountQ and *lainti++ i;
entitled to damage; +rom de+endant +or that amount. 8. /n locIing *lainti++ out o+ a*artment PnumHerQ
and con:erting *lainti++@; *er;onal *ro*ert>, de+endant acted maliciou;l>, Aithout *roHaHle cau;e,
Aithout regard to *lainti++@; legal right; and +eeling;, Aith the intent to o**re;; *lainti++, and Aith the
InoAledge that it Aould He di++icult and more e'*en;i:e, or *erha*; e:en im*o;;iHle, +or *lainti++ to
;ecure Aithout notice a ;uitaHle re;idence Aithin the locale. "he;e act; Aere committed H> de+endant
Aith the intent, de;ign, and *ur*o;e to inLure *lainti++, and, +or thi; rea;on, *lainti++ i; entitled to
Pdollar amountQ in *uniti:e damage; +rom de+endant. 230R0&1R0, *lainti++ reKue;t;: 1. -udgment
again;t de+endant in the ;um o+ Pdollar amountQ +or com*en;ator> damage;8 2. -udgment again;t
de+endant in the ;um o+ Pdollar amountQ +or *uniti:e damage;8 %. 4Aard to *lainti++ o+ co;t; o+ thi;
*roceeding8 and (. Such other and +urther relie+ a; the court ma> deem Lu;t and *ro*er.
17,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NRS (!.%9! 4**ellate court not to di;mi;; or Kua;h *roceeding; +or Aant o+ +orm. /n all ca;e; o+
a**eal under NRS (!.22! to (!.(2!, inclu;i:e, the a**ellate court ;hall not di;mi;; or Kua;h the
*roceeding; +or Aant o+ +orm, *ro:ided the *roceeding; ha:e Heen conducted ;uH;tantiall> according
to the *ro:i;ion; o+ NRS (!.22! to (!.(2!, inclu;i:e8 and amendment; to the com*laint, an;Aer or
;ummon;, in matter; o+ +orm onl>, ma> He alloAed H> the court at an> time He+ore +inal Ludgment
u*on ;uch term; a; ma> He Lu;t8 and all matter; o+ e'cu;e, Lu;ti+ication or a:oidance o+ the allegation;
in the com*laint ma> He gi:en in e:idence under the an;Aer.
NRS (!.(!! Rule; o+ *ractice. "he *ro:i;ion; o+ NRS, Ne:ada Rule; o+ Ci:il )rocedure and
Ne:ada Rule; o+ 4**ellate )rocedure relati:e to ci:il action;, a**eal; and neA trial;, ;o +ar a; the>
are not incon;i;tent Aith the *ro:i;ion; o+ NRS (!.22! to (!.(2!, inclu;i:e, a**l> to the *roceeding;
mentioned in tho;e ;ection;.
"he under;igned hereH> de*o;ited G2! Aith the Reno -u;tice Court, Ahereu*on NRS (!.%8
reKuire; a ;ta> He granted, unle;; the R-C Aant; to ;a> Coughlin i; a commercial tenant, in Ahich
ca;e, a Summar> 0:iction )roceeding Aa; im*ermi;;iHle Ahere onl> a No Cau;e 0:iction Notice
Aa; +iled. /& there i; amHiguit> in the lea;e, ;ummar> Ludgment i; not a**ro*riate, i;;ue o+ laA and
+act not Aell ;uited to ;ummar> *roceeding;.
A::"RMAT"ON $+rs+ant to NRS '5;<=)5)
"he under;igned doe; hereH> a++irm that the *receding document doe; not contain
the ;ocial ;ecurit> numHer o+ an> *er;on.
D4"0D thi; 2$
th
da> o+ DecemHer, 2!11,
18,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
W,;, Zach Coughlin
Zach Coughlin
Tenant/Co+nterclaimant/Appellant
19,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)R11& 1& S0RV/C0
/, Zach Coughlin, declare:
1n DecemHer 2$, 2!11, /, 6r. Zach Coughlin ;er:ed the +oregoingMotion to Amend, Set
Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC Order of Decem&er '(, ')((,
Motion to S*ow Ca+se H> de*oi;ting a true and correct co*> +or mailing in the .nited State; *o;tal
mail to:
Richard 9. 3ill, 0;K.
Ca;e> D. <aIer, 0;K.
$2 &ore;t Street
Reno, NV 89!9
4ttorne>; +or 6attheA 6erli;;
Dated thi; 2$
nd
o+ DecemHer, 2!11
#############################
Zach Coughlin
"enant
2!,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"NDE> TO E>H<"TS
(= (? $A#E :A> TO RJC AND R"CHARD H"/CASE% <A@ER, MER"SS,S
ATTORNE%S 4"TH (A $A#ES O: EMA" REATED TO TH"S MOT"ON, :A>ED (' 'B
((
21,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
E6*i&it (
22,22 Motion to Amend, Set Aside, Motion for New Trial/Hearing, Notice of Appeal RJC
ORDER RESO!"N# MOT"ON TO CONTEST $ERSONA $RO$ERT% "EN Decem&er
'(, ')((, Motion to S*ow Ca+se, S+pplement to Opposition to Hill,s Motion to S*ow Ca+se-
Motion for Ret+rn of Sec+rit. Deposit- Re/+est for S+&mission of all Motions
Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
a!"#o$g"lin%"ot&ail.!o&
Ne'a(a )ar No: 9473
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE: Decembe !", #$!!
TO: Case% &a'e, Esq.
FAX (O: ))* +,- $-*-
cc: Reno .us/ice Cou/ 0ia 1a2 /o ))* +#* 3)!*
Oiginal 4ill no/ 1ollo4.
!* 5age 1a2 6/his 5age 5lus !, 5ages o1 emails a//ache78
RE: .REV#$!!$$)$- in Reno .us/ice Cou/
9 :A(T THE REST OF ;< =RO=ERT< AT !#! R9VER ROC> ST.? DO (OT THRO: 9T A:A<@@@@@ AASO, <OB O:E ;E ;< SECBR9T<
DE=OS9T, <OBR +$ DA<S TO =ROV9DE A :R9TTE( ACCOB(T9(C OF HO: 9T :AS BSED HAS =ASSED :9THOBT <OBR
DO9(C SO, =A< ;E ;< D)$$ DE=OS9T 9;;ED9ATEA< OR 9 :9AA TA>E AECAA ACT9O(
*ear +r. )a,er,
- (e&an( t"e ret$rn of &. /700 0e!$rit. (e1o0it i&&e(iatel.. 2o$ an( .o$r !lient fa!e 1enaltie0 for
.o$r fail$re to 1ro'i(e a 3ritten a!!o$nting 3it" ite&i4ation0 relate( to t"e 0e!$rit. (e1o0it 3it"in 30
(a.0 of No'e&5er 1, 2011. 2o$ faile( to (o to, an( no3 .o$ &$0t ret$rn t"e &one. to &e,
i&&e(iatel.. 2o$ an( +r. 6ill interfere( 3it" &. a!!e00 to t"e 1ro1ert. a0 (etaile( in t"e e&ail0
atta!"e( to t"i0 fax. Note t"e e&ail0 atta!"e( !on0i0t of 14 1age0, (e01ite t"e "ea(er on t"e e&ail0
in(i!ating t"e. are 30 1age0, a0 - re&o'e( 1age0 of 78$itar #enter9 a((0, et!. t"at 3ere 1art of t"e
atta!"&ent relate( to t"e :ine 6 a&1lifier, for 5re'it.;0 0a,e. - <$0t nee(=3ant a5o$t 8-16, &ore "o$r0
a!!e00 to t"e 1ro1ert. to get &. 1ro1ert.. >"e 1ro1ert. 3a0 not (a&age( ($ring t"e a!!e00 1ro'i(e(
on >"$r0(a. an( ?ri(a., *e!e&5er 22-23, 2011, an( &$!" 3a0 re&o'e(. @lea0e <$0t let &e get t"e re0t
of &. 1ro1ert. an( (o not in!$r an. &ore nee(le00 lia5ilit. on .o$r !lient;0 5e"alf 5. ref$0ing &e t"i0
0i&1le reA$e0t.
Sin!erel.,
a!" #o$g"lin, B0A.
1
invenotry of missing personal property continued: sony DCR-DVD610 with
8gb duo memory card
From: Zach Coughlin (zachcoughlin@hotmail.com)
Sent: Sun 12/25/11 5:22 PM
To: psferrazza@washoecounty.us; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
Dear J udge Sferrazza and Mr. Baker,

There is a very sentimental hand drawn picture/caricture of my former girlfriend and cotenant of 5 years Melissa
Ulloa and myself that I believe I forgot to grab on my hurried way out near 5:00pm on Friday. It was resting above
the crown modling atop the area attaching the dining room to the kitchen, where dishes were stored, in the dining
room area, it is a picture of her and I (she has glasses on in it) and I would very much like the opportunity to
retrieve it. It would have been one of the first things grabbed, but I wanted to place it some place where it would
not get bent or damaged and decided it would be safest to bring it in my uhaul's cab near the end of this moving
ordeal, but I am afraid I did not get a chance to grab it before Richard Hill showed up with Casey Baker in tow and
video cameras. How it was at all fair to expect me to enter my former home and law office, which has been
completely turned upside down by a burglary that was able to occure due to Baker and Hill's negligence, then
demand that I ignore that extremely emotionally upsetting occurance and immediately conduvct some crack
inventory of items damaged or stolen, all in less than an hour (after accounting for the travel time to get to
somewhere to send the Court and Baker an email inventory and the time that Richard Hill remained on the property
after 9 am on Thursday) is not at all clear to me.



In addition to the items previously disclosed as missing or damaged is the following, which is missing:
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DCR-DVD610-Handycam-Camcorder-Optical/dp/tech-
data/B00123Q8YQ/ref=de_a_smtd
That is a Sony DCR-DVD610. It had a somewhat expensive media card in it, which sentimental and work related
media on it that is irreplaceable. The card itself (and this camera had one inside and one taped to it) cost money
too:
http://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-16GB-Memory-Stick-PRO/dp/B00488CN1O/ref=sr_1_12?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1324862012&sr=1-12
I believe one of the microphones previously indicated as missing has been found, a Shure SM58a, however, I have
not been able to test whether it is damaged or not, yet).
Two of these are missing as well: http://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-Cruzer-Flash-Drive-SDCZ36-032G-
A11/dp/B001T9CTS2/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1324862190&sr=1-2 at a current price of $27 per
on amazon, however, media and files were on those that is irreplaceable and valuable to me.
The mold that I wrote to Merliss of on May 14, 2011 is in a very large clear bag on the property. The original
carpet, the 100% nylon brown shag, slumlord 101 carept is on the property as well and should be retained should
Dr. Merliss want it. That carpet became moldy and had a poor smell when Merliss' handyman twice flooded (on
two separate occasions) the washing machine in the kitchen). I wouldlike my car seats and other items that are still
on the property for which Richard Hill and Casey Baker's interference preveneted me from having adequate time
and access to remove such.
Additionally, while I have not conducted a complete review of all my hard drives, the desktops hard drive indicates
file on it were modified on at least two occasions while in Hill and Baker's custody, both on December 6th, and
December 14th, 2011. This is completely unacceptable.
Sincerely,


Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
Page 1of 30 Hotmail Print Message
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.


From: zachcoughlin@hotmail.com
To: rhill@richardhillaw.com; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com; psferrazza@washoecounty.us
Subject: interference with my right to get my property
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 01:44:51 -0800

Some of my property remains on the premises. I want access to it, some of it, I believe even
involves both my law practice and my mattress business, and reserve my rights to sue for
damages, even the consequential/punitive kind in the Schiff case where a seafood distributor in
Nevada was awared as damages the entire value of his business, which went under as a result of a
Landlord's nefarious deeds. My rights under the Court's Order of December 21, 2011 where
interferred with. To wit, Richard Hill's contractor, for some strange reason, removed a ladder I
own from the property, preventing my access to the attic. Further, the entire back porch remained
boarded up during the entirety of my access to the property this Thursday and Friday, that
prevented me from both removing my property and in returning Dr. Merliss's property to the state
I would have liked to leave it in. Additionally, despite not having a chained padlock on the back
fence for the vast majority of the time theproperty was unoccupied, even where refusing to let me
so secure the property, all of the sudden, a chain link padlocked is secured to the backyard/porch
gate when it comes time for me to be allowed to access the property and remove my belongs.
Neither Hill or Baker responded to my calls and written, hand delivered requests for them to
remove the lock from the back gate until it was far too late to avoid interfering with my rights
under the Order, nor did either of them ever have the door the house on the back porch be put in
an accessible state, as it remained boarded up.
Sincerely,


Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Page 2of 30 Hotmail Print Message

RE: interference with my right to get my property
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.
From: Richard Hill (rhill@richardhillaw.com)
Sent: Sat 12/24/11 6:29 AM
To: zachcoughlin@hotmail.com
your lying knows no bounds - does it?
you need to take stock of yourself.
just where do you think you will be in 5 years??

stay away from the property!

From: Zach Coughlin [mailto:zachcoughlin@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2011 1:45 AM
To: Richard Hill; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com; psferrazza@washoecounty.us
Subject: interference with my right to get my property

Some of my property remains on the premises. I want access to it, some of it, I believe even
involves both my law practice and my mattress business, and reserve my rights to sue for
damages, even the consequential/punitive kind in the Schiff case where a seafood distributor in
Nevada was awared as damages the entire value of his business, which went under as a result of a
Landlord's nefarious deeds. My rights under the Court's Order of December 21, 2011 where
interferred with. To wit, Richard Hill's contractor, for some strange reason, removed a ladder I
own from the property, preventing my access to the attic. Further, the entire back porch remained
boarded up during the entirety of my access to the property this Thursday and Friday, that
prevented me from both removing my property and in returning Dr. Merliss's property to the state
I would have liked to leave it in. Additionally, despite not having a chained padlock on the back
fence for the vast majority of the time the propertywas unoccupied, even where refusing to let me
so secure the property, all of the sudden, a chain link padlocked is secured to the backyard/porch
gate when it comes time for me to be allowed to access the property and remove my belongs.
Neither Hill or Baker responded to my calls and written, hand delivered requests for them to
remove the lock from the back gate until it was far too late to avoid interfering with my rights
under the Order, nor did either of them ever have the door the house on the back porch be put in
an accessible state, as it remained boarded up.
Sincerely,


Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775229-6737
Page 3of 30 Hotmail Print Message

interference with my right to get my property
fax: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2109/4700 - Release Date: 12/24/11
From: Zach Coughlin (zachcoughlin@hotmail.com)
Sent: Sat 12/24/11 1:44 AM
To: Richard Hill (rhill@richardhillaw.com); cdbaker@richardhillaw.com; psferrazza@washoecounty.us
Some of my property remains on the premises. I want access to it, some of it, I believe even
involves both my law practice and my mattress business, and reserve my rights to sue for
damages, even the consequential/punitive kind in the Schiff case where a seafood distributor in
Nevada was awared as damages the entire value of his business, which went under as a result of a
Landlord's nefarious deeds. My rights under the Court's Order of December 21, 2011 where
interferred with. To wit, Richard Hill's contractor, for some strange reason, removed a ladder I
own from the property, preventing my access to the attic. Further, the entire back porch remained
boarded up during the entirety of my access to the property this Thursday and Friday, that
prevented me from both removing my property and in returning Dr. Merliss's property to the state
I would have liked to leave it in. Additionally, despite not having a chained padlock on the back
fence for the vast majority of the time theproperty was unoccupied, even where refusing to let me
so secure the property, all of the sudden, a chain link padlocked is secured to the backyard/porch
gate when it comes time for me to be allowed to access the property and remove my belongs.
Neither Hill or Baker responded to my calls and written, hand delivered requests for them to
remove the lock from the back gate until it was far too late to avoid interfering with my rights
under the Order, nor did either of them ever have the door the house on the back porch be put in
an accessible state, as it remained boarded up.
Sincerely,


Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
Page 4of 30 Hotmail Print Message

River rock

RE: inventory continued
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.
From: Richard Hill (rhill@richardhillaw.com)
Sent: Fri 12/23/11 11:18 AM
To: zachcoughlin@hotmail.com
Cc: 'Casey Baker' (cdbaker@richardhillaw.com)
Mr coughl i n - r epor t s r each me t hat you have peopl e over at t he pr oper t y
hel pi ng you move.
Pl ease be sur e t hat each of t hemsi gns of f on t he f or mas or der ed by t he
j udge.
Thank you i n advance f or your cont i nued cour t esi es & cooper at i on
Rgh
CONFI DENTI AL: ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT; ATTORNEY- CLI ENT PRI VI LEGE
Thi s e- mai l may cont ai n l egal l y pr i vi l eged or conf i dent i al i nf or mat i on. I f
you ar e not t he i nt ended r eci pi ent , pl ease do not r ead, copy, use, or
di scl ose t hi s communi cat i on t o anyone ot her t han t he i nt ended r eci pi ent . I f
you have r ecei ved t hi s message i n er r or , pl ease not i f y t he sender and del et e
t he emai l message f r omyour syst em. Thank you.
Ci r cul ar 230 Not i ce.
To ensur e compl i ance wi t h r equi r ement s i mposed by t he I RS, we i nf or myou
t hat any U. S. f eder al t ax advi ce cont ai ned i n t hi s communi cat i on ( i ncl udi ng
any at t achment s) i s not i nt ended or wr i t t en t o be used, and cannot be used,
f or t he pur pose of ( i ) avoi di ng penal t i es under t he I nt er nal Revenue Code or
( i i ) pr omot i ng, mar ket i ng or r ecommendi ng t o anot her par t y any t r ansact i on
or mat t er addr essed her ei n.
From: Zach Coughlin (zachcoughlin@hotmail.com)
Sent: Fri 12/23/11 2:33 AM
To: psferrazza@washoecounty.us; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
5 attachments
IMG_20110522_163658 missing items Onkyo receiver tuner Sony subwoofer Technic speaker.jpg (750.3 KB) , IMG_20110818_205455
Toshiba 62hm15a hdtv.jpg (1075.7 KB) , Line 6 Spider III 15 15W 1x8 Guitar Combo Amp and more Guitar Amplifiers at
GuitarCenter_com.htm (146.2 KB) , receipt for purchase of lamp for Toshiba 62HM15A $87.pdf (31.7 KB) , IMG_20110818_203900 hdtv
52 inch in back bedroom.jpg (234.7 KB)
Dear J udge Sferrazza and Mr. Baker,

I am writing to further supplement and clarify the inventory of items missing. Mr. Baker and Mr. Hill, please know YOU ARE PLACED ON A
LITIGATION HOLD NOTICE REQUIRING YOU TO RETAIN AND PRODUCE ALL PHOTOGRAPHIC/VIDEO/AUDIO EVIDENCE YOU OR YOUR
AGENTS HAVE COMPILED TO THIS DATE AND IN THE FUTURE, ESPECIALLY WITH RESPECT TO PERSONAL PROPERTY ON THE PREMISES,
INCLUDING ANY EVIDENCE WHICH REFLECTS UPON WHAT WAS STOLEN OR DAMAGED INCIDENT TO THE BURGLARY OF APPROXIMATELY
DECEMBER 12TH, 2011 (INCLUDING THE POLICE REPORTS YOU SHOULD HAVE MADE). I reserve the right to update this inventory if any of
these items are found, or if others are discovered lost or damaged

I hereby reserve the right to amend this inventory should any of these items turn up under some of the "rifled" through, the use Casey Baker,
Page 5of 30 Hotmail Print Message
Esq.'s expression property, that was completely strewn about the premises. But I doubt they will.

Amongst the items that were missing upon what was obviously an upsetting emotional hurried inventory (you can imagine going into your
home and seeing it look like it been subject to an extensive burglary), were:
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CASPX330 That is the 88 key keyboard, with hammer weighted action, Casio Previa PX-330 that sat atop the
desk in the front office is missing, very obviously
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/accessories/lr-baggs-dual-source-system That LR Baggs Dual Source blend system was put into the Charvel
acoustic "cutaway" guitar that is missing, which was in the front office, and was in excellent condition, in addition to having the expensive after
market LR Baggs dual source system added to it: http://en.allexperts.com/q/Guitar-General-649/Charvel-jackson-guitar.htm-Drive/13055863
http://www.hdtvsolutions.com/Toshiba-62HM15A-reviews.htm I had just purchased a new lamp for that television. Please see attached receipt
for that lamp and attached picture of that Toshiba 62 inch television.
http://www.guitarcenter.com/Line-6-Spider-III-15-15W-1x8-Guitar-Combo-Amp-482276-i1979323.gc That is a Line 6 Spyder III guitar amplifier
that is missing
http://reviews.cnet.com/projection-tvs/samsung-hl-p5685w-56/4505-6484_7-31008492.html?tag=subnav I did not see this Samsung HLP5685
W hdtv dlp at the property. I want to verify tomorrow that it is for sure gone (Yes, its a large television, but it the top had been temporarily
removed from its pedestal.
Additionally, amongst the items that were "rifled" through incident to the burglary was an AKG C300B microphone that is heavily scratched up
and is obviously damaged:
http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/C3000B/?
utm_source=Google&utm_medium=PPC&utm_campaign=livesound&utm_term=akg_c_3000_b&adpos=1t1&gclid=CJ6S_4rkl60CFQ5lhwodV2YG4w
missing speaker as well technic sb-2840
Sony power subwoofer (see picture attached of Onkyo Receiver stacked audio system)
I believe a 1000W Sony Xplod Car Audio 12 inch subwoofer, new in box was taken as well, it retailed for, I believe, about $75 after taxes:
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Sony-Xplod-XS-GTX120LW-12-Car-Subwoofer/12016333
A Sony audio receiver appears to be damaged, I will provide the model number later.
http://www.amazon.com/Philips-32PFL3505D-F7-32-Inch-Black/dp/B003IT6Z40 That is the model of the manufacture in 2010 Phillips 32 inch
lcd television/computer monitor that was utilized in a dual screen display setup at the lawyer's desk in the commercial law office at 121 River
Rock St. Mr. Baker correctly identified it as missing after the break in, as he did the 62HM15A Toshiba HDTV in the living room, and the various
audio receivers, etc. in Mr. Bakers attached December 14th, email (attached and admitted into evidence along with the reply from
zachcoughlin@hotmail.com at the hearing on December 21, 2011). In his December 14, 2011 writing Mr. Baker wrote: "The River Rock property
has been broken into. We believe the break-in occurred sometime on Monday, December 12, 2011. There appear to be items missing,
including the TV in the living room, perhaps a computer monitor, and perhaps some stereo equipment. I cant tell what else. The contents of
the residence appear to
have been rifled through."
http://www.americanmusical.com/Item--i-SHU-BETA58A-LIST I believe that microphone is missing, it is a Shure Beta 58A Dynamic Microphone.
I reserve the right to update this inventory if it is found.
A foam mattress, size full is missing. The wooden platform for it is oddly part in the flower bed and part seemingly used to secure a window in
some fashion, estimated value $800
Two, (2), of these http://www.amazon.com/Keurig-B60-Special-Single-Cup-Home-Brewing/dp/B000AQSMPO $165 Kuerig B60 Coffee Machines
appear to be missing
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Western-Digital-WDBAAU0020HBK-NESN-Elements-Desktop-Hard-Drive/13055863 Two, (2) of those Western
Digital Elements 2TB external hard drives $190.
As for damaged items, the Sony hdtv 52 inch television in the back bedroom is not turning on, please see attached picture (a clearer picture
and model number will be forthcoming).

Strangely, its appears that, even where the contractor (whose bill for $1,060 included a notation of "fixing leak in the basement") boarded up
the back porch, he apparently did not do it very well, as the window to the back door, inside the porch, appears to have been smashed.

I believe there are more things missing or damaged but this is not a task that can be done extremely quickly, and I reserve the right to
supplement this inventory as more missing or damaged items become apparent. I would like some additional time at the property due to
Richard Hill's interference on Thursday and Hill's contractor having taken my ladder, which I was relying on for accessing and inventorying the
attic. Further, I wish to leave this property in very, very good shape for Dr. Merliss. I have respect for Dr. Merliss as I do for this Court, Mr.
Baker, and Mr. Hill, for whatever it is worth. Admittedly this litigation has gotten a bit scrappy, and we have all been challenged by a Landlord
Tenant Statute that is not always entirely clear and does not have the benefit of a great deal of intermediate level appellate court case law to
guide litigants through the ambiguities encountered throughout this case. I want to leave this property in as good as shape as possible for Dr.
Merliss, and believe Hill and Baker are intent on limiting my opportunity to do that as much as they possibly can because they want to pursue
some theories of recovery based upon leaving property at the location, etc., etc., and have their contractors do their typically inflated billing for
work that, as here, ultimately is not very effective, as this "securing" of the property, especially where a window unit air conditioner held in
place by nothing but duct tape and lacking even a simple jam rod atop the sliding window, was left in place on a side of the house exposed to
a sidewalk near the Lakemill Lodge. Or, Hill and Baker may just be legitimately fearful that I may do something to harm their client's interest at
the property and merely zealously advocating on Dr. Merliss's behalf. I feel like an additional 8-16 hours at the property may yield a lot of
benefit to the overall appearance and state of the property.

I realize a stay was denied, however, I believe NRS 40.385 may be akin to the automatic stays attendant to bankruptcies.

Sincerely and Respectfully,

Zach Coughlin, Esq.
Page 6of 30 Hotmail Print Message

Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.


From: zachcoughlin@hotmail.com
To: psferrazza@washoecounty.us; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
Subject: inventory continued
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:09:18 -0800

Dear J udge Sferrazza and Mr. Baker,
Additionally some rare book are missing, family photographs/keepsakes/heirlooms/media, I believe the hammer weighted action Casio 88 key
PX 330 is the model number, I believe, I will have to check.......Further, this is all moot at this point as I have filed a Supersedeas Bond of $250,
and according to NRS 40.385, I automatically get a stay of eviction and am entitled to return to the property and continue in possession. The
statute sets the Supersedeas Bond (which yields a stay) at $250 if rent is under $1000, unless the Court wishes to rule that I am a
commercial tenant. However, if the court does rule that I am a commercial tenant, the No Cause Eviction Notice in this case, under
NRS 40.253 makes a Summary Eviction Proceeding impermissible, as Summary Eviction Proceedings are not allowed against commercial
tenants where only a No Cause Eviction Notice is filed. Its one or the other, but Mr. Hill and Baker cannot have it both ways. Further, the
Courts Order of December 21, 2011 is just that, and Order, its not an agreement, its not a settlement, etc, etc. and the audio record clearly
reflects that.

NRS 40.385 Stay of execution upon appeal; duty of tenant who retains possession of premises to pay rent during stay. Upon an appeal from an
order entered pursuant to NRS 40.253:
1. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a stay of execution may be obtained by filing with the trial court a bond in the amount of
$250 to cover the expected costs on appeal. In an action concerning a lease of commercial property or any other property for which the
monthly rent exceeds $1,000, the court may, upon its own motion or that of a party, and upon a showing of good cause, order an additional
bond to be posted to cover the expected costs on appeal. A surety upon the bond submits to the jurisdiction of the appellate court and
irrevocably appoints the clerk of that court as the surety's agent upon whom papers affecting the surety's liability upon the bond may be
served. Liability of a surety may be enforced, or the bond may be released, on motion in the appellate court without independent action.
2. A tenant who retains possession of the premises that are the subject of the appeal during the pendency of the appeal shall pay to the
landlord rent in the amount provided in the underlying contract between the tenant and the landlord as it becomes due. If the tenant fails to
pay such rent, the landlord may initiate new proceedings for a summary eviction by serving the tenant with a new notice pursuant to NRS
40.253.


Sincerely,


Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
Page 7of 30 Hotmail Print Message
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.


--Forwarded Message Attachment--



z Login
z 866-498-7882
z My Account
z Wish List
z Financing
z Help
z Feedback
z Change
FREE SHIPPING, NO MINIMUM*
z Store Finder
z Shopping Cart
z Products
{ Guitars
Top categories
1. New Arrivals
2. View all Guitars
3. Electric Guitars
4. Acoustic Guitars
5. Acoustic-Electric Guitars
6. Semi-Hollow & Hollow Electric Guitars
7. Classical Guitars
8. Left Handed Electric Guitars
9. Guitar Value Packs
Top brands
1. Fender
2. Gibson
3. Ibanez
4. Epiphone
5. Taylor
6. Martin
Guitar Center
KEYWORDS OR ITEM #

Page 8of 30 Hotmail Print Message
7. Takamine
8. PRS
9. Gretsch
Related Accessories
1. Amplifiers
2. Cables
3. Cases & Gig bags
4. Effects
5. Boutique Pedals
6. Stands
7. Strings
8. Tuners
9. Capos
10. All accessories
Used, Vintage & More
1. Used Guitars
2. Used Electric Guitars
3. Used Acoustic Guitars
4. Used Guitar Amps
5. Vintage Guitars
6. Platinum / High End Guitars
Top Searches
1. Les Paul
2. Fender Stratocaster
3. Telecaster
4. Gibson SG
5. Ukulele
Clearance / On Sale
1. Clearance
2. Electric Guitar Clearance
3. Acoustic Guitar Clearance
4. Acoustic-Electric Guitar Clearance
5. Guitar Amp Clearance
6. Rebate deals
{ Bass
Top categories
1. New Arrivals
2. View all Basses
3. Electric Bass
4. 4 String Bass
5. Acoustic Bass
6. Fretless Electric Bass
7. Signature Models
8. Value Packages
Top brands
1. Ampeg
2. Behringer
3. Epiphone
4. Fender
5. Gallien-Krueger
6. Hofner
7. Music Man
8. Schecter
Page 9of 30 Hotmail Print Message

(Based on 36 reviews)
$119.00
z Shop By Category
z Browse by Brand
z Guitars
z Bass
z Keyboards
z Drums
z Pro Audio
z Accessories
z Platinum Gear
z Vintage Gear
z My Guitar Center
z Account Info
z Wish List
z Shopping Cart
z Order History
z Price Guarantee
z Warranty
z Rebates
z Returns
z Newsletter
z Pro Coverage
z Support & Services
z Locations
z Contact Us
z Careers
z Affiliate Program
z GC Pro
z Gift Guide
z Company Information
z Events & Promotions
z Guitar Center Sessions
z Artist Interviews
z Shipping
z Donations
z Sitemap
UNITED STATES: CHANGE COUNTRY

z Featured Services
Financing
increase your
purchasing power
FEEDBACK
our ears are
always open
GC Garage
guitar tune ups
Page 26of 30 Hotmail Print Message

RE: inventory continued
and repair
View Our Catalog
view this month's
products & services
Gift Card
the perfect gift for
every musician
Musician Services
mix, master,
distribution & more


Copyright Guitar Center, Inc. -All Rights Reserved. - Terms of Use | Your Privacy Rights | Purchase Terms & Conditions
z
z
z
z
FOLLOW GUITAR CENTER:
z
z
z
z
KEYWORDS OR ITEM #

From: Sferrazza, Pete (psferrazza@washoecounty.us)
Sent: Thu 12/22/11 2:33 PM
To: zachcoughlin@hotmail.com; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
Cc: Stancil, Karen (KStancil@washoecounty.us)
Dear Mr Coughlin:

The stay was denied . You will need to ask the District Court for a stay.

Pete Sferrazza
Page 27of 30 Hotmail Print Message

inventory continued

From: Zach Coughlin [mailto:zachcoughlin@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 12:09 PM
To: Sferrazza, Pete; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
Subject: inventory continued
Dear J udge Sferrazza and Mr. Baker,
Additionally some rare book are missing, family photographs/keepsakes/heirlooms/media, I believe the hammer weighted action Casio 88 key
PX 330 is the model number, I believe, I will have to check.......Further, this is all moot at this point as I have filed a Supersedeas Bond of
$250, and according to NRS 40.385, I automatically get a stay of eviction and am entitled to return to the property and continue in
possession. The statute sets the Supersedeas Bond (which yields a stay) at $250 if rent is under $1000, unless the Court
wishes to rule that I am a commercial tenant. However, if the court does rule that I am a commercial tenant, the No Cause
Eviction Notice in this case, under NRS 40.253 makes a Summary Eviction Proceeding impermissible, as Summary Eviction
Proceedings are not allowed against commercial tenants where only a No Cause Eviction Notice is filed. Its one or the other, but Mr. Hill and
Baker cannot have it both ways. Further, the Courts Order of December 21, 2011 is just that, and Order, its not an agreement, its not a
settlement, etc, etc. and the audio record clearly reflects that.
NRS 40.385 Stay of execution upon appeal; duty of tenant who retains possession of premises to pay rent during stay. Upon an appeal from
an order entered pursuant to NRS 40.253:
1. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a stay of execution may be obtained by filing with the trial court a bond in the amount of
$250 to cover the expected costs on appeal. In an action concerning a lease of commercial property or any other property for which the
monthly rent exceeds $1,000, the court may, upon its own motion or that of a party, and upon a showing of good cause, order an additional
bond to be posted to cover the expected costs on appeal. A surety upon the bond submits to the jurisdiction of the appellate court and
irrevocably appoints the clerk of that court as the surety's agent upon whom papers affecting the surety's liability upon the bond may be
served. Liability of a surety may be enforced, or the bond may be released, on motion in the appellate court without independent action.
2. A tenant who retains possession of the premises that are the subject of the appeal during the pendency of the appeal shall pay to the
landlord rent in the amount provided in the underlying contract between the tenant and the landlord as it becomes due. If the tenant fails to
pay such rent, the landlord may initiate new proceedings for a summary eviction by serving the tenant with a new notice pursuant to NRS
40.253.
Sincerely,
Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.
From: Zach Coughlin (zachcoughlin@hotmail.com)
Sent: Thu 12/22/11 12:09 PM
To: psferrazza@washoecounty.us; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com
Page 28of 30 Hotmail Print Message

partial inventory
Dear J udge Sferrazza and Mr. Baker,
Additionally some rare book are missing, family photographs/keepsakes/heirlooms/media, I believe the hammer weighted action Casio 88 key
PX 330 is the model number, I believe, I will have to check.......Further, this is all moot at this point as I have filed a Supersedeas Bond of $250,
and according to NRS 40.385, I automatically get a stay of eviction and am entitled to return to the property and continue in possession. The
statute sets the Supersedeas Bond (which yields a stay) at $250 if rent is under $1000, unless the Court wishes to rule that I am a
commercial tenant. However, if the court does rule that I am a commercial tenant, the No Cause Eviction Notice in this case, under
NRS 40.253 makes a Summary Eviction Proceeding impermissible, as Summary Eviction Proceedings are not allowed against commercial
tenants where only a No Cause Eviction Notice is filed. Its one or the other, but Mr. Hill and Baker cannot have it both ways. Further, the
Courts Order of December 21, 2011 is just that, and Order, its not an agreement, its not a settlement, etc, etc. and the audio record clearly
reflects that.

NRS 40.385 Stay of execution upon appeal; duty of tenant who retains possession of premises to pay rent during stay. Upon an appeal from an
order entered pursuant to NRS 40.253:
1. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a stay of execution may be obtained by filing with the trial court a bond in the amount of
$250 to cover the expected costs on appeal. In an action concerning a lease of commercial property or any other property for which the
monthly rent exceeds $1,000, the court may, upon its own motion or that of a party, and upon a showing of good cause, order an additional
bond to be posted to cover the expected costs on appeal. A surety upon the bond submits to the jurisdiction of the appellate court and
irrevocably appoints the clerk of that court as the surety's agent upon whom papers affecting the surety's liability upon the bond may be
served. Liability of a surety may be enforced, or the bond may be released, on motion in the appellate court without independent action.
2. A tenant who retains possession of the premises that are the subject of the appeal during the pendency of the appeal shall pay to the
landlord rent in the amount provided in the underlying contract between the tenant and the landlord as it becomes due. If the tenant fails to
pay such rent, the landlord may initiate new proceedings for a summary eviction by serving the tenant with a new notice pursuant to NRS
40.253.


Sincerely,


Zach Coughlin, Esq.
817 N. Virginia St. #2
Reno, NV 89501
tel: 775 229-6737
fax: 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
Nevada Bar No: 9473
** Notice** This message and accompanying documents are covered by the electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may
contain confidential information intended for the specified individual (s) only. If you are not the intended recipient or anagent responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any
action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender, delete this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named
recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.
From: Zach Coughlin (zachcoughlin@hotmail.com)
Sent: Thu 12/22/11 11:01 AM
To: psferrazza@washoecounty.us; cdbaker@richardhillaw.com

Dear Judge Sferrazza,

I respectfully submit to you that the inventorying of stolen, lost, or damaged personal property i simply not possible by 11 am given the
interference conducted by Baker and Hill, their removing a ladder to the attic (that belonged to me, no less) from the property, their keeping
the property boarded up, the incredibly strewn about/burglarized appearance and state of the entire property, etc, etc. It is simply not possible
Page 29of 30 Hotmail Print Message
To: 4bi596]9c21b-'b42-ged8-cf4e3de
omlIMessage
^

IW: Zlclcooghl1n

lopmv|deO0p8ng o|novOym8ONW+ny0MMng 0glmUI81m.
F8nFm |Whglv0#o008R|0mm8$$Uol IZI8wt8ocXMN
Zm1b
0DD86M15APrc]mcn(62KM15A}
1-6-11 2123p . 37 of]7
Page JoJ
qemmwm$8ng,88chmhW9ndkmh8np||n08$mI$$Ing.3 nc lw|cv$Io0 0Omp0Mtmonto|,ol0fOBfmoO|lOI/$
K
.
M|N|n|8+%e8p8n8WIgheamn
cv0tIglar$,SmI|hIg cnd |o< IOm\#d|ofNOtdngmtfophoc$,||B8B0Svc,m$lf80ulpmOl
mgemPl00mRDfOX8nWOod8Ommotgl00mRre|8f|n\pm|y 0|M|ng,
WO0d0h5h00ohPK
F|
wme
$cvBt|mm0HDol88|Bm4|+Im1rl|e08|
rdHDadmpmm
mmO$oundtmvdmct0$,
c0mrKMWOg0IMI +0p||$,f0I|ymn008mnlo$8kwk,obIymId00m$ddmWf10p0S8 lom$
nlo+lISptO||y+nd 08lIvcfyou 0tlBt|mc|\fOtgm |Uw1|$mM|t@OfdamdwNnBhrOlS.
pnmAlw$hW8mlIlehIg8hdc+fudIo8|npII81$,+0ly 8||m0amVWpm |ng,qy'w|lcf0I|J|Optfyad
wmrm[E,MC
ZsmC0N|r\U
11^.`lrg051#Z
N,WJ1
lc|!11J ZZ9-b11
M:b119Z
ZhCohliohiI.=
^cWMI^v
.. NDI" Ti . mgsnd&nymydmvwcm|mcokCmwksvFt1vwyC1UG.C,25\0M?,Wg
c cnw|n.n \ 0nmInlm0 DmIIllindividu.1 ()B|y.Tl)umWl0nn4:IgImorM'I mnaibQ kdl|wtQkw
nmroIm}smmtIyowmw dI|t|rI in Cwd\mt8B/t v0w,dIwItu\Icn0ogyQOIho I&kia oIq
mmm=xmo|monImW0u9m|yMm7NrMhM lMWM4)fU#mdrzOPmt|rJWmy
mom#MHmmtrk oNme/mkf0&8 /m WFwkeIw.yh0fm;m
r|flt),0M4lP0f0MmM,mytq,dM|f0r<|AOwWMh=fWlf8dMOtcUmlm @O0cmtenu
:
mhmdm$hmNmRmm.1fyrwr w0tmwwm,DOn0fUmmdrctent{y],lwm@U

mr,me+dhe<fJmrftfmddtmyymm|0v}nftQ.mfbyQ[m00vme4
I
i re@lmtlOm| fmyffw#<tM,WJpDfoMwkHr#I
+

`!
. + +

V
httns//writer.7oho com/eritor.im
Page i 0
1 2124/201 1

.

.
Y8gT
LN1f 2WRmtMW& ZI|(C|1 W48Z6{1)ng wW WN .+ TTUVeC
Osm^cb.1 MnMNe=M+t-whm9wAmmm
W W MP t, WW wwWyB4 wNmM&
GW 6#D WmmuI= m|m Wz M0UI9P~eHW
vatNeaI46 mmlObIttlMWVV etlM . 1M%tNM|4||XlU11
U.SCJ. 1m..1W|z)(5),107()[V},(qU.V.V.9-101+|,H.R.0.b1@.@,tR. 1101WW,JW,M?.
=4Mo ,87||Jp472Z5wAANU /V|| R+IzmW& ?MV|||{Ql J
Ok70{11)K PmWwna0L.{{.T.,IWlepllWLd8m3mWQqI " "1111
)I w> )||wvw 6I0wmmwtm86dm wUw=== YA m NMW w e ,&m
wQmwN W\\9 UMW~wmIJedmIwlJt wH4mdI0MmWIJ121JUWZ,
2!1WWa!4d0 VOhWkrm,mwwNw,Mm9WfWMl>lM9OmM|
wo 0wI18buiI0tc1<I,Z011{ap.}OlMMlBm!Ma.WOMWW0mW n Vh
ar\4vzlA |NClJH0VWSM SS|NC,MTIR|CT,?fN &bwtet cW& <I&mpq{a Om
e=~emmMW8DQQQlawoWY w Qw/<I Y=@W.wafM1 w8#4w9Mv|46
nwM90a q mQWW 6w 1ml ZW1 .N 1y74N008WWI W8


=mmw~{1 %IW ,m Wc|wWUNw'eMW0 W weQWWVl0
m t0. M mcfC|6 M8 nHnC,S8.R. T9?3LDlORDNOT k&A ZVIII{[
\ 2 )I.'" &.,r.B.O._"\IIIu. MUW I}CEUWW14,a 90O1Ne
=U. ON mWhd+ m l BAmmp& m|t1 #Otst|l,^vw
~=ovm WwrqJa v bwp4 mP# WIde9 ~
= ||0r Wwammm0wW ImMktatN __ |mkMtwum
wmnb wV I mB .Ng1WM.tlzQMlQ)|.OR).11V-V7g1 1(T.\Ul
U.C.C.I 8.11_; NR.&. 1W10 m,@;N.P5.1J1eI8W.,11MbZ<w . 1MP# ?3

lANDO AMT ZV|lR6otemAm 23v|||{D)Dm 2M|11}KMhW


wr r t0.1.D, 1y16Um0rWLamdBM38nImhQdbtt %LmW 4lR MjqNW6wHNqV
Wu{1|0RKWMWW 8%Hrw0YvXhO0OW440 Imt ,=s|a|uegm W
w|l&n4mbeM8ra:<H0PUCmWm 6IjM1Z11Wm,21\O W wrw
anm,0DPl MI/1ww.k$ w8 W,wwle%W\\ 6|le m~Oo'sew#t@qWMtN8 walMI
@I D1W?11lz@}0WVnB w Oe|!0C0h1nW1%WMVmWhd00""Whan4MMAWINH
HDWNSN$,YES,THAISPlCKT,6?|NCHE. >dabcoWh!es6cvgsheMotndpya6?16chmmt
au0bgpy:w f69r0MVM0OV u )O WbvIt0N,WW4IM!.MI WWWOMwk
a mWWwMWws\ mdmWEM .l0vtltNO R M0WCnWe 8I IMa04c@wQC
&r,EmJ.LPFwvmSdWRRT:Wmmd1Z148O3O{0nM .m.
modw .O mmmOom{wI.Fr|Z1OMw0|tw/.V5
mmN|1w.mm NM_ 11mM/WlW|M|1=mwgM3~,
1_2t.DI0_25 TZ|mWMN.g(1Wb,K8} LM||11W1XCvVam W=
|UK0nw_mhW(1^.2M,IM Hw {tO080Ml8tt$fO13O4NI088B16$0I.w|O1.IQ |N_TTWmVWb8
mm jgl0e zIweSt 0t Na adN f.BeJ1Imytckimwsvppkm64dB 8MJW% tmP. M l.8w!a!0M.
Hq8WYTTVO LIT3IOMNDf|CR6O\8P|NYDUTDR,N O PPD0UCEA
POROEOIA EV|0ENC6YDUWYOMRTfR6HNE VOTITDTO 3H1SAND|NfHEUFESPWML 3T
RTTC31DHNLPRORTY DNTKEPPE|SES,INUDNCYKRSUPNY1YwWOR
|NVIO3O3HTWDF 3OEVEMWI Z Z01(|lKU3HTMPE6Y0OHAW
M. msVHwwW4an|m mw0o4%a WWd8M$%VHW
RVW wsaW=Vt660WvpVN wwVteWh,VwV8wJB,E.4,wtw
m w=awV . 8vl|<mJw ~uumvw 1tW6 ryv Mwwmaow>
w ~gmggyWws RWWAWMW6noe w
1A itVW\ lhmw*WYWr4mVWm
mm m Nt LyOGMy V |
V]F,\vwmtWawskt08 W8I0WPU g MWm
@6dvN=M 10AW0 8~ pJ
O.w.mm1 -tV . bw|!Just$ 0 u%nw WWV twm WWWrw
krvI6ItQazwwWv Tmmlzkvbkn.gum&e< er-0 |-!5.1W1Wr
^PgcbaLMMh|MtaVUmwA i6W = 0 M M
5\N9.sub|4Unct8l"|nS 8 HUwmdIp8IWM. |w6l WY 4yW0MW6Mp p,meW
wVl6Vph0dbeen W twI8 mVm A IIy,n W wMw t8"tMWhmmWlhe@qws
wMC\hIWlw8v IJ6O4KupndWmU/w.h0W s\vo6 w.wmml
IwG-UWPV_mmQmtmI<0Wm@_4W1\1~VN6,4I4FUU
paa sW!Wtetotqwtem m|OmRaVdIW f0wa06ony/L
A1Z100O |er ,mInmrwsM6esw|mwfo1,f6lm8 ,B7bB%l 1W.wd.mO-1ZW-
1Z-r-Ob ?10aWor wznmm4ze4.|=ww MtltN||JW1ww m
3lT-N43hI80em0IMI0e89k1PYK|wmv:w2m
lBWJ66W9e lV0MWl60MioWm|mma|1Z1R^W NlmwmPWWM6
v86 I4U11uZMbA3M04H1VVVmw0t0v8l

IM e MB|00w.W 1408m J w
hnns:/lwrifer.7ohn cnm/ecli fnr.im 1 24/01 1

Y8gc 0I^
W &rw8 etRmbW a W0woMW,1Z.W11.TN WW
Mm W=WT=mrmmw0P ,wM&w4m1wWwOWW
mmwW0mN .zmm.8||M-||lW 8lMMl6mWtnWt
WMWMwe. lmemMyw ewNm RhM .ANm RW60N8AP .3mwWK1$
oddpenIn!WlW8pVRg Pu? Wi~ mf 4W,m m wd v03wQ,mv so
hI|p`W = N6<><iHFtm$1MK4V &0m8\WW8lWW
,.ms H%G~WmU
bB0MW%MWd4Vm5wmWWkDWMw0q(@
m{UwWOmWT.W ,y m m8nW0eDOrwMm>1.MW
n0fw XInvemQupV00W0.Wa:NW0^\y ,W0MW0WmV8p
a Ir 1 m& &.Vmmth#$6moDlSn I w6k0WnMdoeer qw,wfB U
hWwp|r iM 0VN+BSrdMmWWWL d8ddN1& epe:t/WWMHAa
M MWTwywifOk0gPM0:WK!w 8t%WWW8 M0a? fWW,

fWIw 4
oqxW q,veN$mM!wW.N6 m wt . Ms8mWvVM.V.WM!. WWW
qWww9BWM mwm WBP 0 #yWTo|ttnmWw~w
meWm mMomG#Iwmm nmwqV ~W&tm NoawWv= . 1
W I1oN4VMH>maSv+&6 WO.M lm4mW 0HitwB4Nwmw
+6 V 9W nPVMmk tw=wwWW wwdmIigpwm& ~W = w4W BV F
40tIet^III IH p Ww10Nhc,uVmIY6BcVB0M,m0s'mMP; p qmqW em4woa
Ol\OheNop1awb)nWiloUWUmbb 0 w|mwawpVMM0|wsWkon0WUhtM ''H
Wp1L0! Ot .1||IwB vm0k W ||u.Wrto/d;QWP0 wB\Wp
W m=w.N W0fW8WJ mM%q yysWWw:wm 0O@Mm
4mWOV1m BaWw8%m 0r,fWNSWPmk0eqra4W rTWQy
wmW2Vh=NY1W|.0+M99W7hll_"_ BIf N"N T
RM0Dam0 mam%qWl. wCnmumtN18U.S.C.21.ZZ1.40BfO=I
km6to\11tn0e4WVsM6bwbI4ueI\8}w.RIO tI. nt III. __ ft.1 Of mgtMwW ggWV0wr
yareAc m m4\mWmVOW 4 m1mtwyt=wmw,,meOWIOonme
ououOWGm mWwTh 6^WmRWwWW~slwm rmnWmwvww
,mwdmQMm40um tWRatemewm,ywWW8w ym
m ,4mowwwowwmuowm WmBWVW mM$NWmmu mH)0
VGMKW,WBN PVWr=}, m=Ifr, I! m\,4%4M 0JN+yN
mw.8wepemdttnVm mwm0s)I>w=4)minJn|wMWM' . Fm
wT`p~||wta@H W '=Mww O211 12.W1
Mz 4S M tW W Wl mAp= =NtBWW6w,W BVW
wNWIlPX 3 i memW, m ,fW0C..w,wbm=was Na
o$A.a0gwNw.M$ w geeUy~wameMum:WVwDu8mp T
WW#Sm re&By=at$frei4hw$10 ,wSUCedww~W8%WBD8
Itf. PV=4tu|V&RamNwWWCENWmBC ,vn46rNPSM2m KeS
P>Ime:at M0&Smq<Psm0BM&lAMmw maW1mnWwW. 1M
mWWM b!.H|IdBmh &lbvw ,U1WMWOLZ1.Z18MWLI0,PW
a4l~awwWwV tmmvww SWOWW 0w4WWM%10
mmWW/PWy.MPwa yMWwe wWWMS.Z.1.ExN OWp t m Mmm
W WyWB w0mmNwMVaVoemmvm~WwWw; WOalhW&
Q0l<00wwMmk WmI 90Y4 %1,,VOWJ,WmRWm0O3
`pm,MW#~0GM. D0l4ns4dNalbemwc 8r0ewmmmape1A801 equWho4 6ww
}tmmO0aele6to4trrvmbI)apoiwWcwctv 8OHAts mtlw$MwtrkrMvunW
WDm ym mUnWa60m ymsN,W00bmmIee,omInVMM= pwA
umwmPMDWmWwWo MOOV BveWVapm ywWbmmkWsm
p t m wvvcc mmUvw &8W.W0WW$Wmmbmym
p!azV4MW1BmmPN WwNPS>hUNm17N 5
P00NWW02W5RMI7bBtmW`WHm Nm121Zu
CovhfauaQwa6mn/,u 4w@t=t4M +w D0R&OCovhkmm\%Ih7W312.Wr10
pM w t wm n).vmbak tQmdh|Uw&t+e w&NNt.B,A4dNeIIyw mowommgQ
9kW AhawW%B8NMWWP6IW,,1|W
=. +wtw,VwmBWMm Sm==M+I gaswyW#
amW90WWVpqemvTWV@yeW$W8W 0Wcm
$10wCodw mVtlM ,kV0d0mntMl|t0llW ONQMMW
NOMVW,0NM1mmay .>Bmta Mm&w%
%0lWWWW0oI)N w0VKRW. Ibm oV m,0IM.wom0YWW/. Fm 1.Vo
W|U21,TTl6 |awf,KWWW m,BKwVW1mrl/twVtR8S>
IWW Vmm I%W8PW=Wm Jm4|geU/.\QW!m 6n00toe:ed0a
NW1.F&sowmva0 m =Cmm yWOM6[wWWRamtWMmW$
httns:llwrirer 7ohn.com/editor.im
12124/2011
* n
,


Y8g0T
51,WRPJ,VP0DO0MlW#mq,wVP#mmm .= rwW0mMO|Vom p
mmaya|.AWu qVm4WV |mmOV0pmfmakwl0s0 bPoW|mitve mq
WWwWw!4b1i|yo6VPm y90W 4.t|s0eo/mDWW.0fWum yeb ,onm
VV# U dWmmepe|\d 6 tw2A0W|ensPKOV 6 aww Wa al Um~
4ieasml$/Vbm1 m IIh&&m=wm sw=mMVwmwWWWdRW
P6WMUm/mWAmWa sQm <WVmmm WN
".bICO 6\7NWWWNW1w|ZVW1wm eMM
94TmmMwaOMveWCmPA16U.6.C.2101 mm g
OO l!mWV mw mm .yateAWWOw:W 0 M wve
kk mrwywemwRva|}D0fWf0VG0WRBR08\MW m ,move=mWany
wm~vomW~!hismbW|ThIteMO m RkWmw6@s)eHm m ble
wtmuv 1ekac= m@Om mfK0 Wvneta e ||}weVkM sl ,8M
My,W,dmtiwWWBOMMQWwm=mmmWm nbo|mbWws0d8m W
vmltoo e10slnm,0twWvm), aW&m wwVfMW ,w y
/k arWm#FIJwmWWmr=MfB Nf=swpW
m k.F w=mWm mJ41IPW .~ ,
mbwdMmV mW61W11JN1M0`wmtWuN.w
wmm r4e A l=ww)VMVWW,M=w|%
p11myrnV m WU/BWH1V rm =I I."ll a lv:WMWW 1W\%,
VmI0B0 umm/@ewapm dMUVBm=owaJ,M ||10Mmn|mwW
p =0=mWA0MBMB$[n b.1 b m h-. I Pto. w|wmvsMl
DM ~W0Q0l121MN1T08P((2H|1MweWMmexputeWWe6d
Ne0aM m 9M.mk mqm V 6gewe de
e e |g1at$emqmwa|mm q, t m w mqgwmmQ
bwwmmwm, w wMwwdMbw
mHswt amw=w=m RM9wMWm
W_ olommw0mek mmthlnMam amAWy #cmWNo|vbmo
mw9n~>;y p mU m ,bh9 m%I wwfhP444YPm
6mlPoM|IIB00CHGP, + ek2gCM.817MV@M.NIg@m$&
T4@hN m i.cmwztNw7 Ne|co*p'oFol|vwB1 m %0gmJm1Z11Za0hh m T Rk
HmkerQma|dbm .=m4mrw .#he|@clt|dNwk|wN< w wh
0mhlMN0PThv12O1111 OKM{0 mtWm,mmmmsmmw
.m tWtWOW8=U.Hf.0wy +UMa40 wWmvw
mVBUmWsMk SmW Wm 8mMwm qUm W A,wMrelWWPW
WON m && MVeemW w W1wN 0r#,w|wcNY 1WIm 0W
B6Mu\h8vewqb8sisloraIe6on11mm Fum,y4em0mWm9Wp8wMyf|8|
WN T0d00mm0|mw"II mWare,W0qu1I;M8O Wv mWwmWM PIII WW MW
a<r|!ewmII 0. P|wmmIfMII Wm KC80lV0mWm , H mDMmMmY.Bt|j,ZchUhkn,
E.1TN.Vn=R0NV%1f WT}10 N6| 4ndVSOHBI F m tR1W JCWBz0
znQo'HKuW|mC@{= mm Qwm w. =BkF121ZAMT0.zm
4M(hiladl.. COo: R d,_hd 0M 6sM9.11&t0awWWmw
w=wTWVWYw4w w=mwmwa|VWWW11M.|0W0
O MMP121F6etH ,UD.B,MMH4CmWW N
: (O488EwT. m.1|1+V eRo12|1N112zbCoukkaTo
m=m=4 w=@t=wW.=F=M (a@h
1214/115SPTo.mbaketQtmaHh| N<kt@m lw= gbetkh|dtMw3W0#Vd~
awYPWDWUPvkm4cu).vmre~M. Uoow,ydrot m)%Mb1I6up% mJ,W
P0WkDch t@W6Ww|mNN|m102w, ef=Pmn=,and
m0whatwm 8 nmwmwPcwgm1td w g#MkbWeYmW4wMV9 ,wm
m kmwreq0|)tdcWwLr,Dmmbied w+itw=a|tmv|fVwW
om&deofmemWdmmd a=~WwWmmWW=MMW
MmuwImmWp|m gmVwwDa0$QVWWgBW , a W tWW
0OW=mW&WmmUVF &aemv|m+i\ qgm W
WVVwlCWF{aN BmMMWMMmpq4meD>mmwm
0ee6W$wmv& masw1=WOd I _ p ,e_ b n R%|wwmm w8)W
=.UmM Ma!ofmoS dCmghf0,E.617N.W2FwW\I+x.96677b@ = wtt<
tN73*FmmmbammaM | w.= mT0<mm4.cmth|fQtMw M . wt3RM.1TT
I3.HlCtgm3MHRW aswb = n|m. Wb WVAl m Xo m =mWN x ,Omt1|,11.
*TmtraNmmmMWVTV1vw00PSm ,8w=w4w |#41MfW
6N0 QNWU0 e~a #mmowmm ImwWGMmsW . h mO6W
=P m#mQV =Fw.CMW m ,6R wC.W NwN
Q>w: 0Q34 msmmam=mm1MW 12I1II11mTo
hhnHwDter. mho. com/edi tor. i m 1214/2011


Y8g0O0I^
Wm|U|BW mv4, mWWPRNtewa0mNVwmBUouwp
wU 440WWB%VWK wwPWbgW4LU.Qy,WVWW
O HWeWem d0Umbp w m.HNaYjMmW X mk VWW 1Z1R N
HlMmWWWmw"m m,WwvwvWP4MN mwmm}mWM W
mmWWYwmWPAWlUwWQ WWWmoV%oMmW1mOM
M~@3# 4V6 n.V 4a)..o.whp} m=WORww MwWveq(owo
mS6Valmto M 6M0WnWm=8emWMnMemWV om } 9M\BFN66wwrw=
bIm0eI dOI2IRi0t0 WBWmepO t ,yateWWWB D%m .Wm +. W%
Y $. wm0t@hlW0ewmeCAM|bM vnkm@W&n14WBPC IM$. o6nQ0Wm|d0 m6

Nc l%$t4tI|yIo0O0epppUWm mm~wDA0 r|to.. .). kwtMW 0loeMBl0


mekpWh8swwo|4l93WWW3 Tocbl620m1.h.MWUT.MTosHM1q
NN9dW1b!V,M.+MH. 6,wYl0#W u6V MWLANDV 1W,.vWswam}\i ate~
w%MlWwI%W<lWuO6Ny m,4tmmw0Dyl p#,WWf0M 4VaPCM6
B Madmyl|0lm}an0WwmcPV aIo. O m,)M vm0|eamv+ vW0 MmD7.Z 1
NPMW8IoDVOV#DV0L8mV8N0pmdmwWm S0aNm1I,Wasr ,W
NJRCP1 1-SNR51\6z,NR5!otwby . .ImBM46#mwlh1WVM88WMd#||yv0N O
mIM WMeyB\anam60DOdHwVPBNw9 PY
I0MVn%woVawatWWVomWWMMVB=HW |Hn=IYm 6
M 0U04e kvmYCVWMMWM1w mV6~mwmtVm4WmSW0wym
8w tqmW mV#VUwVpqWK 68|kwaM7HWmmmy w~
lpwmM3m VSOMNRS11W1layawzotm A6AI%VWW 6M
NPMU4m SOuv=Vmm mQ60B mWMmWmWVWN .MWW
W 60mdW#mWmrm.1R0w m ~rw WW0WMWmtWMVsumqSV
W mmmB mHmaW= 1 ovo#tu=w!4okrBWVWwwv
=g00dW 1%w0Jsw WM9q/Mmw#i0NRS11.?WM4V0dWl%peB
wWmvmew0wm Mln|mwWpmdVm(N11A2W
bf% wnUpkM.K0mwfl8Wt8y4>8%mamm=Ra
OMWVpqlmWmBRe9|td$VVr1 9 m64W0jm0W%1h0W%W Pzy 0I% 4WWW9W
p0m W $W11WZ4Z[2)qll.W8lM m l u31 Hl6XOQMMwM06WnQQ, 8M B o %WUm
NRS1111W0m u$U ndwdImUt@d81WlhoWP0Vv~=by0Meykw)Io4wI
eVeNkdmtWmVwwWW%WW 0W0@!WgmV46pmw |.mU WB
anmVo|mWOVWMnQ.NRS11bAZlh6WKM WIowU6wswqm dWOWmd
VYVWVd64w=wmoD/Sv0VowtvmvpwWVmmV dWL%W
p8T=tmkpaM tBW WbtsWVEw WWOMmVmmaw
m to 1osat.VWlm Wmw30daJinB0 r= N=|tvW Vi whk
NVDn0|d l0m=aotl6 pzgWWOm]ml#|nVteaW31 VD m NV0pqoKKHiB
MO06K1AulI0t8te8lJd06\mma|amm essk Jm8VW mam N 00t|tdN Voq+
Mm 80t,ZzcbCoQb60,W.b17M.V1gk4ZR89M752Par.949M740Z0tN 0@m.0Va9M
9JkiMH0t0tKWRgIo0lm1Z/1TZabCcuyM0!oRkb8tdH4Imtmmm
p 6t1zz@asmh.wm Z8cbCa[z@m4comI5et58\1l1"'4W10MH4IltbIw tO1v,
= ~moN J9 W.O0pvs WOqppqIo0Hl%mWm 1W 4 mwvMMlL|m 4m
W0sPptemwm W#tmmJQm1o4WWB nmwWToWkVBm
\-hvm9wa WdoWHNW4 w 86MVe WVm|^M PWN9Y0W&SBIWML%0m
sqhuuocerV 6OnsOrd 6tMO 21,211WWMw !oxwlRmwdH4's=,WemaMm 8dWl
VPWr|b.Pwm==VW Fum.WwPMpdvll@vew@P6W0Iep
yB%FM,vP W mmmqp qwmtWD.M pp=M1WmWWWW V0
Amh,WDma=wwmWNWV BY M!MWVpww pmB WW0lWW
nmwV ,|wmwmWwmVgwwmwWmWW&M
WVpp8mp NMHwM1u6mmW&wW0MmmwvMWwBV0mgBN
WKWWlWM\8hw0wqgMV IVL,dMwWVm o !Av6WVoW0vemmmDpvl
6-9WM WwMd\Cn,m.8l7N.Y m N W:m7$2M<7b9M7
T|1NQN t.maBtNo!1M' hn S8 0ma/q0 RB !0ObyV04
LKMHMA1 U.8C.2>10-Z\,VoImbUtQ#Io9MtqUR-UW10wWPW
1?/?1ZUTop r.wm@ m tdh 8BW.WZCl#Mht@m.comI58tt601
`X .m 0Im q . mmwQ6rdw.mJeW M 4 aI KN,% I4Ov8rS mwbewdt4 t
d IBOm;WmMfyI|| 1|m00do01oI^/lsN wWUnrJ8 V 8l1mI1MMyN00Pb0mw Y0B6BI!7mo0
ld8r. W 81W6VOmW0I+a|oe=rmkvi0Xk0.W lBd weW w ,MW04in|@WBwB u
=emmem!(memg UMml0 wW tJmlmmecqwrw mBR RWM Oo V oVqmbW,bm1
w nlelB6ohw6wmg8Im~m4mmkwwwvmR 8 m mzr0loatdMms
O 0ul1amMlW0otg0t<e1Dgt001\meRrdH M6dww8tIaW aWV4MCW t9S. lwRWalw|M1
u AW0mRKM4mMMw1wwn8du#mWbtg|eqU84MW06 WMW
,f^|q,VwVlVlwwvMmNwmwy=/U <Immm
ot M ABki0k0w0aAeMkwMDWpww 6MMVL wI In om MM&VW
P `l/Vi 1Or.znhO. cnmllnri m 12|24|2011
N
"# ..

.
r
PagO 0
l2CV0P09WWWPmm=m OP tT211 wam 4WV 6w 0wVO
C0mMMB$wWVil'flocll i 12H}1
*
httns:lwriter.7.oho.cnm/eritnr.im
12n42011


L
U!T

ffV ]a// - oo!?


CO
-,<
cC"( '

$
2
5

'' _
'

Lo , S S-
O


\ L/
2/d ,
Y
.
\

S

S


v
-
f/ L
Z"c CA ' '
I

, :

LWff
P .
1

RICHARD G. HILL, ESQ. "
State Sar No. 596
2 CASEY D. SAKER, ESQ.
State Bar No. 9504
\
3 RICHARD G. HILL, CTERED
652 Forest b0
4 Reno, Nevada 89509
(775) 348-0888
5
Attorney for Plaintif

-


F I LED
11 DEC 29
PM l: 39
\j U11
RJUi
,, 1
LU!
6
IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TOWNSHIP
7

COOF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA


9 N MERLISS;
I
Case No.: REV'Oll-001708
Dept. No. ,.
1 0
ViB1DO,
1 1 v.
12 ZACYBfRCOUGILI';
13
14
1
5
16 TO:
1 7
!
Defendant.
)
NOTICE OF ENRY OF ORDER
ZACHARY BfR COUGHLIN, the above-named defendant.
YOUWlLL PLEASE TAK NOTICE that Order Resolving Motion to Contest
18 Personal Propert Lien was entered on December 21, 2011, in the above-enttled matter.
1 9 1tue and correct copy of said Order Resolving Motion to Contest Personal
20 Propert Lien is attached hereto as EXHIBIT 1.
21
22
AFFIRATION Psuat to NRS 239B.030
The undersigned does hereby afrm that te preceding document does not
23 contai the social security

f
r o

person.
24

DATED this . day of December, 2011.


25
26
27
RICG. HILL, CTERED
CASEYD.
28
652 For Steet
Reno, Nevada 89509
Attoreys for V1B1DD
(I7
F~ NA m
t
. .
wWC||K6
. HLL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
1 8
1 9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
: 28
M
fw)
EXHIBIT NO.
1
\

,
'
I8IT INDE
DESCRIPTION
Order Resolving Motion to Contest Personal
Propert Len
'\
= .
?
e
Y
.
:,'_
. Y
I 1
, . .
+
^
1 ~
~
. . =
*
4
PAGES
5
A 4


EXHI BI T 1
EXHI BI T 1

.
2
J
4

0
7
,

I0

FI LED
1 1 DEC 2 1 PM 12: 1 7
.
s.
bT =:

JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TOWNSH


COUlY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA
MATTHW MRLISS,
Plaintifdlord,
vs.
Cae No. REV 201 1-001708
ZACHARY BAER COUGHLl,
II
Dept. No. 2
Defendantfenant.
I2
IJ
II

I4
I
I5
Having considered the evidence presented to this point and the partes having
I7
ageed to allow te Court to enter an order based on said evidence. the Court fds that $480.00-
I
is fair and reasonable compesation for storage of the personal property afthe Defedant for
I
te peod of Noveber 1, 2011 VNovember 16, 2011.
20
Based upon the foregoing, the Court herey enters the following Order:
2I
1. That the Defen!" !, Zachary Coughlin, shall pay the sum of $480.00 in
22
certed funds to the Plaintif at te Law Ofces ofeasey Bae on or before Wednesday
2J
December 21. 2011 at 4:00 p.m.
24
2. The Plaintif shall have the rigt to videope the premises fom 9:00
25
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Thursday. December 22, 2011 and said video $include personal and
20
real property; however, they shall not identif any personal inforaton of any clients of the
- I
1


Defendant's Upractce. Uadditon, the Plaintif, by his attoreys or other authorzed
2 reresentatve, shall have the rigt to videotape the property following the removal by the
o Defendant of his personal property, which shall occur on or before b.p.m. onDeember Z
4 Z1. The purpose of the video is to determine wheter there is any damage the 1mor
5 pesonal property of the Plaintif which 8include all DWand applithat belong to
0 the Plaintif. Baddition, te video shall be used to verif what property, if.any, is lef on the
T premise by the Defendant.
.
8 J. Anything ad evg lef on te property afer b.p.m. on Frday.
Deember ZJZ11may be disposed of by the Plaintilin his sale discreton.
4. Defendant shall hae access to the proerty fom V. a.m. b.p.m.
li on Thuday, Deember ZZ, Z11,to videotape, ifhe desires, te D and personal property ad
I2 to remove his proper fom the premises. Uaddition, te Defendant shall have from V.a.m.
IJ to b.p.m. on Friday, December ZJ,Z11to videotape and remove his property from te
I4 premises. Access Wbe provided by a representative of te landlord, who Wunlock te
5 property at V.a.m. and lock the property at b.p.m. on bot days.
I0 b. The Landlor shall have no liaility for anyinjues sUered by
I7 Defendant or anyone else during said removal process, ecept for a in

etional tort committed


I8 by the Plaintif or his reresentatives against the peson of the Defendant and, likewise, the
I Defedant shall have no liaility forany injury to the person of te Plaintff or hs agents,
20
except for an intetonaJ tort by the Defendant. Further, anyone te Defendant authorize to be
2I on te premises during teperod Thursday, December ZZ
4
,fom V.a.m. to b.p.m. and
22 Friday, Deember ZJ
4
,from V.a.m. to b.p.m. shall sg the Release of Liability, attached
23
hereto as Exhibit A. Uany tird party is on th premises witout signg the waiver, they shall
24
be tespassers d the Plaintif or hs ag
e
ts can have them removed by l

w eforcement
2 0. The Defendant shall not cause any daage Vthe realproperty or
20 personal property of the Plaintif located at 1Z1 Riv Rock, Reno, Nevada, from ths
.
date
- 2 -

forward. The LWwill retain jurisdiction over the issue of ay daages caused to te real
2 property or pesonal property of the landlord during the removal process.
J 7. The Defndant shall have no claim fordamages with repect to missing
4 or damaged personal property at 121 River Rock, except for property identfed by h, H
J
writing, by 11:00 a.m. on Thursday. December 22, 2011 by email to W.Bake, wit a copy to
0 te LW The Defendat reeves any oter claims he has that may not involve his personal
T property located at te premises to the extent legally allowed by statute or case law.
8

I
II
I2
1J
I4
I
I0
I7
I

I
20
2I
22
2J
24
2J
20
8. The Plaintf reselVes all claims of any nature including. but not limited
to, additional storage fees from November 17. 2011 up untl December 23, 2011, damages to
the property allegedly caused by the Defendant, dispoal costs of ay property left behind,
attorey's fees ad costs to the extent legally allowed by statute or case law.
b bL L11tis _ fDmbe.
-3-

+ +

111LY1M
By siging below, your agents bereby release Dr. Matthew Merliss, the Mattew J.
Mediss Living Trust, the law finn of Richard G. Hill, Charteed, Richard G. M ,Esq., and
Casey D. Baker, Esq., in advace, fom any and all injuries, from ay source ad of any knd,
aising out of your or their presence on the property 8 Z1 River Rock, Reno, Nevada, today or
in the future (assuming fture authorizaton for same), excet tho,se arsing out ofan intentonal
tort by either party against the other. You, personally. agree to indemnif the above fom ay
such loss, cost or daage, including fees.
By signg below, you agee to all of the foregoing.
Dated this day of December, 211.
xbD1A
I
2
3
4
J

1
8

I0
II
I2
13
14
IJ
l0
1T
I8
I
20
21
Z
23
24
2J
20

LMLLbNL
D Townsend, ces: (a) she Ua citen of the Uite State, ove 18 yeas of
@ and not a paty to the W acton, and (b) that afant seve a cOpy of the attache on the
pesons, at the addresses, on the date, and Ute maner icate below:
Name:
Addres Vwhich
mailed/delivered:
Deember 21, 2011
DOber21 , 2011
Name:
Address to which
mailedeli:
Deceber 21, 2011
December 21, 2011
LVLbL, Seretary V
PETJ. SJusce of te O
Reo Justce Court, Deaent 2 ,
Richad G. i, Esq.
Casey D. Baker, Esq.
652 Forest Ste
Reno, NY 89509
date had delivere.
date place Wcounty inteofce mail.
.
date p1ace Bcounty mailing sYtem forpostage
and deposit in 1.b.mail.
ttted via fcsimile to 775-348-0858
Zachary Barker Coug Esq.
817 North Via b0 !
Reno, N 89501
date had delivered.
qplaced in county inteofce mail.
date placed in county m system forpostage
and deosit in U.S. mal.
UMWvia facsile to 949-667-7402

+ ,
1

1 CERTIFICTE OF SERVICE
2 Pursuantto NRCP 5(), I hereby certif th.t an employee of RICHRD G,
3 HILL, HRED, and t.t on the2' y of December, 2011, deposited in the United
4 States mail, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Ent of Order and a true
5
and correct copy of the Order Resolving Moton to Contest Personal Propert
6 Len, filestamped December 212Ujaddressed to:
! .
7

9
1 0
1 1
1 2
13
14
1 5
1 6
1 7
J
1 9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
I
Z.eh Coughlin, jQ,
`
c/o Silver Dollar Motor Lodge
I North Virginia Street, Ste, 2
Reno, Nevada 89501
-
v
`

' 1

You might also like