• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
: . (
, ,.~
\ue0001
N o . 9 7 -8 G 3 0J \u00b7-A
c. . .
fN T E E
C O (m TO fP ,P F E f\.L SO FTHE \ue000
S
T
.
~
.
l
\u00b7
E
\ue000O fr" :'A .N S A S \ue000
1 :1lh e " f a tte r o f th e1 '1 1 m T ia g e. ) f
f.Ia U t:;:kR ic h a rd s o n ,\u00b7 P e tiri :m e r/A p p e lle ;;
v .
-_ ...:...--._ ---_...\u00ad
B P .lE Fo rl\u00b7j? P J ::L L E E
r \,J p e a i irm ath e u i s t r l c ':C ounf " f S b a W iite (o u rIY , K m sas
T n t'H
(
)
n
(
'
,
(
l
.
l
b
~
f
;
\ue000Jm r:ef.' ?
B u c h e !.;,J u d .! ? e
JX stricr C o u rt C a:;e
f\0 .
9 60
2
1
~
;
\ue000
w
.
.
-
..-
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
...\u00ad
.\" ,\" ,,,'j- ! <.
r
.
1
~
"
l
r
l
"
"
"
\ue000.) " i....
.:./;-p ';'")'
r
..' J....,
l
,
,
\
.
~
\ue000
~
\ue000
l
U
~
\ue000
..j
.
_
"
~
\ue000
.-;:..'' .
,,,.'_ i_ .!
,H
O
:
r
F
~
,
i
A
N
\ue000&F iO fF s 'v !;\N
. \ue001! .] '';:\-\'e s t S e v c n :hS rr.:'e l.
C ;tn :'k :nS u ile
'f o n e b..K a n :> \u00b71 3
S 6 61) 3
\u00b7'1 .' 1 '7 \'':;'':'~
.
"
)
\u00b7
I
.
'
Q
"
I
'
1u .
"
0 )\u2022...1I
,. . ..
J
.
~
\ue000
...'O f)
F '\u00a3 i::(
7
8
5
~
,
\ue0002 3 3 -Z .l7 3
TABLE O F CONTENTS \ue000
N A T U R EO FTH EC A S E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1 \ue000
STATEM ENT OFTH E IS S U E S
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 \ue000
STATEM ENT OFTH EF A C T S
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1 \ue000
Suprem e C ourt R ule No. 6.02(d). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 \ue000
ARGUM ENTS
A N D
A U T H O R IT IE S
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 \ue000
I .T H E C O N S T IT U T IO N A L IS S U E S R A IS E DB Y A P P E L L A N T F O R T H E F IR S T \ue000
T IM E O N A P P E A L A R E N O T P R O P E R L Y B E F O R E T H E C O U R T F O R R E V IE W
. . . . . . . .2 \ue000
I n
r eD .D .P ., J r.,2 4 9 K a n . 5 2 9 , 8 1 9 P .2 d
1212 (1991). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 \ue000
I nre R e s id e n c y A p p lic a tio no f B y b e e , 236 K an. 443, 691
P .2 d 3 7 (1 9 8 4 ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 \ue000
M a lo n ev . U n iv e r s ityo f K a n s a s M e d ic a l C e n te r , 220 K an. 3 7 1 ,5 5 2 P.2d 85 (1976). . . . . . . . 2 \ue000
M is s io n a r y B a b tis t C o n v e n tio nv . W im b e r ly C h a p e l B a p tis t C h u r c h , 170 K an. 684, \ue000
2 2 8 P .2 d 5 4 0 (1 9 5 1 ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 \ue000
Lam b
v .B u tle r C o u n ty , 108 K an. 739, 196 Pac. 1059 (1921). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
2 \ue000
S ta te
v .P u c k e tt, 230 K an. 596, P.2d 1198 (1982). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
3 \ue000
P ierce
v . Boardo f County Com m issioners,200 K an. 74, 434 P.2d 858 (1967). . . . . . . . . . .
3 \ue000

II. T H E T R IA L C O U R T D ID N O T A B U S E IT S D IS C R E T IO N E IT H E R \ue000 IN IT S M A N A G E M E N T O F T H E C A S EO RIN T H E F IN D IN G S A N D \ue000 O R D E R S C O N T A IN E D

IN T H E D IV O R C ED E C R E E.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
.
4 \ue000
I n
r eD .D .P ., J r.,2 4 9 K a n . 5 2 9 , 8 1 9 P .2 d
1 2 1 2 (1 9 9 1 ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 \ue000
S ta y to n
v .S ta y to n ,2 1 1
K a n . 5 6 0 , 5 6 2 , 5 0 6 P .2 d
1172 (1973). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
4 \ue000
Inr e M arriageo f M cN eely,1 5K a n .A p p .2 d 7 6 2 , 7 6 4 , 8 1 5 P .2 d 1 1 2 5 , \ue000
r e h .
d e n ie d 249 K an. 776 (1991). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
5 \ue000
S im m o n s
v .
S im m o n s , 223 K an. 639, 643, 576 P.2d 589 (1978). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 \ue000
C O N C L U S IO N
. . . . . .,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
5 \ue000
C E R T IF IC A T E O F S E R V IC E.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
7 \ue000
N A T U R EO FTH ECASE \ue000
R ic h a r d s o n e s s e n tia lly c o n c u rs w ithD om brow ski's s ta te m e n t re g a rd in g
th e
n a tu reo f th e
c a s e .
H o w e v e r, it is im p o rta n t to n o te th a t c e rta in p ro c e d u ra l a s p e c tso fthe post-appeal courseo f
th is c a s e a re
absent from
D om brow ski's statem ent.
S p e c ific a lly .
th e
C o u rt
w ill n o te
th a t o n
J a n u a ry 2 2 . 1 9 9 8 th e C o u rt is s u e d n o tic e th a t th is c a s e w o u ld b e e x p e d ite d a n d th a t n o e x te n s io n s
o ftim e fo r filin g b rie fs w o u ld b e g ra n te d . P u rs u a n t to th e ru le so f th e c o u rt, A p p e lla n t's B r ie f w a s
due ono rbefore February 9, 1998.
O n February
1 3 ,
1 9 9 8
th e
Court issued
a n
o r d e r to
s h o w
c a u s e b e c a u s eo f D o m b r o w s k i' s " s u b s ta n tia l fa ilu re to c o m p ly w ith th e ru le so f th e c o u rt, a n di n
p a rtic u la r S u p re m e C o u rt R u le N o . 6 .0 1 " .
U nder the term so f the aforesaid order, D om brow ski
w as to have her briefo n file n o la te r th a n M a r c h 5 , 1 9 9 8 .
O n M arch 9,
1 9 9 8 , D o m b r o w s k i flle d
h e r M o tio n to F ile B r ie f In sta n te r.
O n M a r c h 1 1 , 1 9 9 8 a p p e lle e file d h is M o tio n to S trik e F ilin go f
A p p e lla n t's B rie f.
O nM arch 18, 1998 R ichardson's m otion to strike w as denied.
STA TEM EN TO FTH E IS S U E S
I .
TH E C O N S T IT U T IO N A L IS S U E S
R A IS E D
B Y
DOM BROW SKIFO R
TH E
F IR S T
T IM E
ON APPEAL ARE NOT PROPERLY BEFORETH EC O U R T FO R R E V IE W
I I .
TH E
T R IA L
C O U R T
D ID
N O T
A B U S E
IT S
D IS C R E T IO N
E IT H E R
I N
IT S
M ANAGEM ENT
O FTH E
C A S E
O R
I N
TH E
F IN D IN G S
A N D
O R D E R S
C O N T A IN E D
I N
T H E D IV O R C E D E C R E E
STA TEM EN TO FTH EF A C T S
R ichardson
agrees w ith
th e s ta te m e n to ffa c ts
p ro v id e d b y
D om brow ski for the
lim ited
p u rp o s e
o f th is
a p p e a l.
H ow ever, w ith
re g a rd
to
th e
w ay
i n
w h ic h
the "facts" are
p re s e n te d .
Richardson w ould state that D om brow ski has, in som e instances, argued her case in this
s e c tio n
c o n tra ry to S u p r e m e C o u rt R u le N o . 6 .0 2 (d ) w h ic h s ta te s th a t A p p e lla n t's B r ie f s h a ll c o n ta in
" a
c o n c is e b u t c o m p le te s ta te m e n t,w ith o u t a r g u m e n t,o f a ll th e fa c ts m a te ria l to th e d e te rm in a tio no f
th e q u e s tio no r q u e s tio n s p re s e n te d fo r a p p e lla te d e c is io n ."
(E m phasis added).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
....
-
~
-
-
...._ --_
....._
-
-
_
..._
-
-
....
_
-
-
_
...._ _
..._
\u00ad
1
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...