• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
IN TH EC O U R TO F A P P E A L SO FTH ES T A T E O F K A N S A S \ue000
In th e M attero f the M arriageo f
))
C o u n ty A p p e a le dF ro m : S h a w n e e C o u n ty
H A L L E C K R IC H A R D S O N ,
))
D istrict C o u rt C ase N o .:
9 6D
2 1 7
P e titio n e r-A p p e lle e ,
)
v s.
)
P ro c e e d in g s U n d e r C h a p te r:
6 0
)
C L A U D IN E D O M B R O W S K I,
)
P a rtyF ilin g A p p e a l:
R espondent
)
R e s p o n d e n t-A p p e lla n t.
)
D O C K E T IN G S T A T E M E N T- - - - C IV IL
T h e d o c k e tin g s ta te m e n t is u s e d b y th e c o u r tt od e te rm in e ju ris d ic tio n a n dt o m a k e
calendar assignm ents pursuant to R ules 7 .0 1 (c )a n d 7 .0 2 (t).
This is not a briefand should not
c o n ta in a rg u m e n t p ro c e d u ra l m o tio n s .
I. \ue001
C iv il C la s s ific a tio n : F r o m th e lis to f c iv il to p ic s u b -ty p e s lis te d b e lo w , c h o o s e th e
o n e w h ic h d e s c rib e s th e p rim ary is s u e in th is a p p e a l:- " 'D = l . . . , \u00b7 v " " o : . o . ; r c . . . , e " - -_ _ _ _ _
_
2 .
P ro c e e d in g s in th e D is tric t C o u rt:
a .
T ria l J u d g e fro m
w h o s e d e c is io n th is a p p e a l is ta k e n : J a m e sp , B u c h e le
and Richard A nderson
b .
List any other judge w ho signed orderso rc o n d u c te d h e a rin g s in th is
m atter:
J a nW .L e u e n b e r g e r
c .
W a s th is c a s e d is p o s e do f in th e d is tric t c o u r tb y :
Jury Trial
~
\ue000
B e n c h T ria l
P le a
D ism issal
d .
Length oftriat, m easured in days( i f applicable):
3 /4o fa day
e .
S ta te th e n a m eo fe a c h c o u rt re p o rte r a n d /o r tra n s c rip tio n is t w h o h a s
re p o rte do rtranscribed anyo r allo fth e record for the case on appeal.
(T his is not a substitute for a request for transcript served on the individual
re p o rte ro rtra n s c rip tio n is t p u rs u a n tt o R u le3 .0 3 )
EstherL . Thom spon. C ,S .R .; M arthaL . Young. C .S ,R .: and Carleen
L .H orenkam p. C .S ,R .
f
S ta te th e le g a l n a m eo f a ll e n titie s w h o a r eN O T lis te d in th e c a s e c a p tio n
(in c lu d in g c o r p o r a tio n s , a s s o c ia tio n s , p a re n t, s u b s id ia ry ,o ra f f i l i a t e
b u s in e s s e n titie s ) w h o a r e p a rtie so rw h o h a v e a d ire c t in v o lv e m e n t in th e
case on appeal:T he m in o rc h i1 do f th e p a rtie s ; R ik k i A le x a n d ra
D om brow ski,
g. \ue000
S tate the nam e, address and telephone num bero f any attorney w ho has
represented a partyi nd istric t c o u rti f th a t a tto rn e y 's n a m e d o e sN O T
a p p e a r o n th e c e rtific a teo f s e rv ic e a tta c h e dt o th is d o c k e tin g s ta te m e n t.
C learly identifY each party represented.
T he P e titio n e r-A p p e 1 le e - H a lle c k R ic h a r d s o n
M r. D o n a ldR . H o ffin a n , A tto rn e y a t L a w , # 0 7 3 3 2 . 1 1 2 W e s t 7
1 h
S tre e t.
G arden Suite, Topeka. Kansas6 6 6 0 2 ,(8 5 )2 3 3 -5 8 8 7 and M r. Jason P.
H offinan, attorney at Law , #17637, 112 W est 7
th
S tre e t. G a rd e n S u ite .
Topeka, K ansas 66603,(785)-233-5887
R e s p o n d e n t-A p p e lla n t - C la u d in e D o m b ro w s k i
M r . A la n F . A ld e rs o n , A tto rn e y a t L a w , # 8 3 9 0 , 2 1 0 1 S .W .2 p t S tre e t.
T opeka. K ansas 66604 - (785)232-0753: M s. N ancy Freund. A ttorney at
Law, #10807, 1611
S .W .3 7
th
Street. Topeka. Kansas, 66611 -
(7 8 5 )2 6 7 \u00ad
5 8 5 8 : M r. J o h n A m b ro sio , A tto rn e ya t L a w . # Q 7 4 8 9 , 1 2 0 8 S .W . T y le r.
Topeka, K ansas 66612 - (785)233-0524: M s. A inka C. K w eli. A ttorney at
L aw , #16721, P.O . B ox 196, C hanute. K ansas 66720 - (316)431-4563:
M s. L aD essa M .D eL aC ru z . A tto rn e y a t L a w . # 1 7 1 0 5 . 1 2 0 S o u th
M a r k e t. S u ite 4 2 0 , W ic h ita . K a n s a s 6 7 2 0 2 -
(316)267-2929: M s. JaniceA .
D o ra n . A tto rn e ya t L a w , # 1 7 8 0 5 . 1 2 0 s o u th M a rk e t, S u ite 4 2 0 . W ic h ita .
K ansas 67202 -
(3 1 6 )2 6 7 -2 9 2 9
G u a rd ia na dL ite m fo r M in o r C h ild
M r. Scott D . M cK enzie, A ttorney at Law , 1020 S. K ansas A ve., Topeka.
K ansas, 66601
-
(7 8 5 )2 6 7 -5 4 0 0
7. \ue000
J u ris d ic tio n :
a. \ue000
D a te jo u rn a l e n tryo r ju d g m e n t f o n n file d :
June 28
th
,
1 9 9 9
b. \ue000
Is th e O r d e r a p p e a le d fro m
a final order,i.e .,d o e s it d is p o s eo f th e a c tio n
a st oa llc la im s b ya ll p a rtie s ?~
Y
w
e
~
s_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
c. \ue000
I fthe orderi s not a finat disposition ast o all claim s by all parties, did th e
d is tric t c o u rt d ire c t th e e n tryo f ju d g m e n t in a c c o rd a n c e w ith K .S .A . 6 0 \u00ad
254 (b)?:N ota p p lic a b le
I fa p p lic a b le , d a t e K .S .A .6 0
M
2 5 4 (b ) c e rtific a te file d : N ot A p p lic a b le
d. \ue000
D a te
,
~
1
9
~
9
:
.
=
:
:
9
~_ _ _ _ _ _
_
A n y p o s t-tria l m o tio nf
i
l
e
d
:
.
.
.
:
!
.
J
~
u
l
!
,
I
y
~
2
:
.
!
:
:
6
~
t
h.....
,r
e .
D a te d is p o s itio no fa n y p o s t-tria l m o tio n file d :
A so ftod a y 's d a te . th e
O rder has not been signed regarding th e D enia]o f S tay
I.:
f \ue000
D a te N o tic eo f A p p eal filed in D istrict C o u rt: Ju ly2 6
t h
,
1 9 9 9
g. \ue000
O ther relevant dates necessaryt oe s ta b lis h th is c o u rt's ju ris d ic tio nt o h e a r
th e a p p e a l,i.e .,d e c is io n so f a d m in is tra tiv e a g e n c ie so r m u n ic ip a l c o u r ts
a n d a p p e a ls th e re fro m :_ _ _ _N "-"=ot.=...;a::,Jp""'p=li=ca=b=]e=-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
h. \ue000
S ta tu to ry a u th o rity fo r a p p e a l: K .S .A . 6 0 -2 10 1 (a ) a n d 6 0 -2 1 0 2 (a )(4 l
1. \ue000
A re there any proceedingsi n any other courto r adm inistrative agency,
s ta teo rfe d e ra l, w h ic h m ig h t im p a c t th is c a s eo r th is c o u r t h a v in g
ju ris d ic tio n (y e so rn o )? :_
.
.
.
.
!
.
.
N
~
o
~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
Page 2
I f " y e s " , id e n tify th e c o u r to r a g e n c y w h e r e th e re la te d p ro c e e d in g is
p e n d in g .
L is t th e c a s e c a p tio n s a n d th e c a s eo rdocket num ber:" ,-N ,-" ,o :.!;.t_ _
_
A p p lic a b le
4. \ue000
C o n s titu tio n a l C h a lle n g e st oS ta tu te so r O rd in a n c e s :
D o e s th is a p p e a l c h a lle n g e th ec o n s titu tio n a lityo f as
t
~
t
u
t
e
\ue000o ro rd in a n c e (y e so r
n o )?
N o
I f " y e s " ,w hats ta tu teo r o rd in a n c e ?-
-
-
-
'
N
~
o
"
'
-
t
a
~
p
~
p
~
l
i
,
-
"
,
c
"
"
,
a
b
~
l
.
!
:
:
.
e_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
W as th e statu teo ro rd in a n c e fo u n dt ob e u n c o n s titu tio n a lb y th e tria l c o u r t (y e so r
n o )? : N ot A p p lic a b le
5. \ue000
R elated C aseslP rio r A ppeals:
1. \ue000
Is there any casen o w pendingo r aboutt ob e filed in th e K ansas A ppeU ate
C o u rts w h ic h :
(I) \ue000
A rises fro m
s u b s ta n tia llyth e s a m e c a s eo r c o n tr o v e r s y a s th is
appeal (yeso rn o )?
N oI fy e s . g iv ec a s e c a p tio na n dd o c k e t
num ber.
N otA p p lic a b le
6. \ue000
B rie fstatem ent (less than one page), w ithout argum ent.o fth e m aterial facts.
T h is
isn o t in te n d e dt ob e a s u b s titu te fo r th e fa c tu a l s ta te m e n t w h ic h w in a p p e a ri n th e
b rie f.
Follow ing and unsuccessful appellate appealo fJ u d g eB u c h e le 's p rio rO rder
thatth e R espondent m ove backt o T opeka, K ansas from
L am ed,K ansas.th e \u00b7
Respondentto o k the appealt oth e Suprem e C o u rto f K ansas.

W h ile th is w a s p e n d in g ., th eP e titio n e r v o lu n ta rily s u s p e n d e d h is v is its fo ro v e r ay e a r a fte ra n in c id e n t w h e re inth e m in o r c h ild w a s re tu rn e dt oth e R e s p o n d e n t. a t th e a g eo f

th re e . w ith d irty c lo th e s , sm e Jlin go f a lc o h o l a n d m a riju a n a . w ith o u th e r u n d e rw e a r
on andi nh y s t e r i c s .
R e s p o n d e n t to o k th e m in o r c h ildt o ad o c to r w h o c o n firm e d
n e g le c t, a n d p o s s ib le a b u s e .
T he R e s p o n d e n tw as a v ic tim
o fextrem e physical
v io le n c e a t th e h a n d so fth e P e titio n e r w h ile s h e liv e di n T o p e k a .
Y et. even w ith
th isn e w evidence.th e trial court stilI ordered that the R espondent leave her
liv e lih o o d a n d m o v et oT o p e k a .
7. \ue000
C o n c is e s ta te m e n to fth e issues proposedt ob e raised.
Y ou w in n o tb e b o u n d b y
th is s ta te m e n t b u t s h o u ld in c lu d e is s u e sn o wc o n te m p la te d .
A void general
s ta te m e n ts s u c ha s " th e ju d g m e n ti s n o t s u p p o rte d b y th e la w " .
1. \ue000
D idth e tria l c o u r t e r r in e n te rin g a n o rd e r, a n di n d e n y in g a s ta y fro m
s u c h
o r d e rp e n d in g a p p e a l. th a t w o u ld re q u ire th e R e s p o n d e n tt o lo s e h e r
e m p lo y m e n t. th e h e a lth b e n e fits p re s e n tly p ro v id e d fo r b o th h e r a n dth e
m inor child, increase the costso f her household expensest oJ iv ei n a

substantially sim ilar m anner inT o p e k aa s s h e n o w e n jo y sa s a h o m e ow ner in Paw nee Rock. Kansas. and which would m akeh e r and her daughter, th e p a r tie s ' m in o r c h ild .

m ore likelyt o suffer continued physical abuse from
Page 3
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...