Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PART 1
Alpha to Omega
For Mike
2nd Edition
Project Initiated: December 4, 2007
Project Completed: June 6, 2008
Revised: Thursday, 24 November 2011
GEOFFREY S. DIEMER
www.deltagroupengineering.com
rstorti@gmail.com
Copyright 2011: Delta Group Engineering (dgE): All rights
reserved.
www.deltagroupengineering.com
Preface
One does not find gold prospecting in a field filled with miners. One
must break new ground, not perpetually overturn familiar soil.
Riccardo C. Storti
We experience gravity every moment of our lives, yet most
people rarely, if ever, pause to consider what the force of gravity
actually is. To others, this question borders on obsession. Gravity is a
mystery that has plagued scientists for hundreds of years. Although
Newton and Einstein formulated ingenious tools for depicting
precisely how objects will behave due to the effects of gravity on
Earth and in the heavens, it may surprise many people to learn that
their work does not actually reveal the root cause of gravity. In other
words, we know that all material objects both generate and respond to
gravitational fields, but science has absolutely no idea how objects
cause gravity -- until now, that is.
The answer that has recently been uncovered, as described in
the Quinta Essentia series, extends the work of Newton and Einstein
using a mathematical framework commonly employed in the field of
thermodynamics. The physics is exactly the same; the only difference
is in the way we choose to depict the gravitational model.
In Sir Isaac Newtons time, some three hundred years ago,
people depicted gravity as being a pulling force which attracted
objects to one another in the heavens, and invariably caused objects to
fall to earth. It was also believed that gravity was transmitted across
great distances of space and that when it reached a distant object a
pulling force would be imparted upon it; thus this transmission of
gravitational force was referred to as action-at-a-distance. Newton
and his contemporaries surmised that a fluid-like substance of some
kind must fill all of space, acting as the medium via which the force of
gravity was transmitted. This mysterious substance was referred to as
the aether. Even though Newton implicated the aether as the
medium which transmitted the force of gravity, he could not logically
reconcile how a fluid-like description of the aether could allow
objects in the heavens to move as they do, simply because fluids act to
impede the motion of objects. If the aether was in fact fluid in nature,
its viscosity should cause the stars and planets to slow and fall out of
their regular, seemingly perpetual orbits.
The formulas Newton derived in his monumental work
entitled The Principia have been used not only to predict the orbital
motions of the planets; they are still used to this day to plan our
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
Table of Contents
Preface ................................................................................................ 3
Preface ................................................................................................ 3
1
The void.......................................................................... 13
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
Space-Time..................................................................... 26
1.7
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
Virtual reality.................................................................. 79
4.2
10
5.1
5.2
Intrinsic inertia................................................................ 88
5.3
Extrinsic inertia............................................................... 94
5.4
6.2
6.3
6.4
7.2
7.3
7.4
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
Gravity.......................................................................... 145
8.6
8.7
Cosmology.................................................................... 164
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.8
9.9
9.10
9.11
Cosmology.................................................................... 194
9.11.1
Fundamental........................................................ 194
9.11.2
Advanced ............................................................ 195
9.11.3
Gravitational........................................................ 195
9.11.4
Particle ................................................................ 196
9.12
10
10.2
10.3
10.4
www.deltagroupengineering.com
11
12
www.deltagroupengineering.com
Nothing is Everything
Among the great things which are found among us, the existence
of Nothing is the greatest.
Leonardo da Vincii
1.1
The void
The Sun, the Earth and all the planets of our solar system
float in the vast expanse of space, effortlessly, almost magically
suspended in a mystical, indefinable void. It may easily be assumed
that few people today ever give a moment of thought to the question
of what space actually is. To others, this question is an obsession.
The nature of space has been a source of philosophical and
scientific debate for thousands of years, beginning as a rational
argument to substantiate the existence of nothing. Before humanity
had any experiential knowledge of space, the debate raged over
whether a three-dimensional volume could be completely devoid of
all substance. If there was in fact a true void, could it even be thought
to exist? Over the centuries, the void eventually gained acceptance
as a truism, shifting the debate to questions concerning the physical
nature of nothingness. Was the void truly nothing, or is it composed
of an ethereal substance of some kind?
The question posed by philosophers throughout the ages is:
how can nothing exist as part of our reality, that is, since nothing
represents a state of non-existence? This is a paradox and a
contradiction in terms. Some ancient Greek philosophers expressly
opposed the existence of the void for this reason. But the precise
definition of the void at that time was considered to be a true and
complete nothingness. One interpretation of the vacuum was related
to the idea of zero, which is in many ways just as unfathomable as
the concept of infinity.
The Roman poet Lucretius is well known for the phrase: ex
nihilo nihil fit, meaning, nothing comes from nothing an idea
originally expressed by the Greek philosopher Empedocles (495-435
BC). Empedocles view was that everything in our material Universe
had to be born of something else, something tangible. Something
cannot be created from nothing, nor could anything simply disappear
into nothingness. To the Greek philosophers in this particular camp,
everything that is, is and forever will be, so there was no rational way
to include the idea of nothing or the state of non-existence into
arguments regarding the nature of matter.
www.deltagroupengineering.com
13
14
www.deltagroupengineering.com
1.2
15
Three-dimensional shapes.
Each solid represented one of the five elements.
16
www.deltagroupengineering.com
Geometry
Hexahedron
Octahedron
Tetrahedron
Icosahedron
Dodecahedron
17
1.3
18
www.deltagroupengineering.com
19
20
www.deltagroupengineering.com
1.4
www.deltagroupengineering.com
21
22
www.deltagroupengineering.com
23
1.5
The final nail in the coffin for the luminiferous aether came
in the form of a famed experiment performed by Albert Michelson
and Edward Morley in 1887v. The experiment itself was formulated
on the premise that if the Earth was actually moving through a fluidlike medium, we should be able to detect our movement through it.
Imagine you are traveling on a train. Lets say you decide to
walk to the diner located two cars ahead of you to have lunch. As you
walk along the aisle in the direction the train is traveling, and you
walk at a rate of 4 kilometers per hour (k.p.h), your speed relative to
the ground outside will be 4 (k.p.h), plus the trains velocity which is
100 (k.p.h), yielding a total combined velocity of 104 (k.p.h). When
24
www.deltagroupengineering.com
you walk back to your seat after lunch, your velocity relative to the
ground would be the trains speed minus your walking speed.
If the aether existed in the form envisioned by the
Maxwellians, then the speed of light through the aether should be
shown to have a velocity relative to some ground speed of the
aether. Michelson and Morley tested for the presence of the aether by
sending out two perpendicular beams of light from a single point
source, which were reflected by mirrors back to a single detector. The
design of their experiment relied on the wave-like nature of light.
25
1.6
Space-Time
26
www.deltagroupengineering.com
27
28
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
29
1.7
30
www.deltagroupengineering.com
31
at the surface of the Earth for example, pump out every last molecule
of air, and shield all thermal radiation so that the vacuum was at
absolute zero temperature, we would still be left with a vacuum of
space filled with energy fluctuations. Energy, therefore, can never be
completely pumped out of a given volume like air can. Energy will
always be propagating throughout the volume of the vacuum because
the vacuum is, in a sense, composed of energy.
This is due to the fact that energy, as it propagates as an
undulating sine wave, can never fully come to rest. Even at its lowest
energy state the energy must cycle about its ground state; in other
words, energy never flat-lines, it must always cycle. When all the
quantum states of lowest energy are summed across a given volume of
space, it adds up to form what may be considered to be a sea of
quantum energy, with waves propagating and fluctuating about with
random direction and intensity. This model suggests that the vacuum
is actually composed of electromagnetic waves (i.e. photons of light),
that together form an ocean of energy termed the Quantum Vacuum
(QV).
A ball floating on the surface of a roiling sea will be jostled
about by the waves; it wouldnt just sit there motionless. Likewise,
when we think of the vacuum as being an undulating sea of quantum
energy fluctuations, it is no longer possible to disregard the effect that
the vacuum has on matter, and likewise, the effect matter has on the
vacuum.
Building upon this conceptual framework the Dutch
physicist, Hendrik Casimir, predicted that the vacuum should have a
rather strange effect on matter.vi The phenomenon he predicted has
since been dubbed the Casimir Effect.
The QV is composed of a near-infinite spectrum of
electromagnetic waves of different frequencies8 (cycles per second),
amplitudes (wave heights) and direction. The QV is somewhat like
quantum white noise, analogous to the random static seen on a dead
television channel9. In free space, far from the presence of any matter,
the quantum static of the QV is uniformly random.
The Casimir Effect emerges when matter is placed within
this finely rippled terrain of the QV. The effect is observed when two
flat metal plates are placed parallel to one another in a vacuum. Here,
a boundary condition is established in this otherwise uniform space,
changing the nature of the wave conditions existing in the QV. Each
plate establishes a boundary, physically separating the region between
8
9
Termed modes.
Entirely random and incoherent.
32
www.deltagroupengineering.com
the plates from everything else outside them. This simple point may
seem ludicrously obvious, but the importance of boundary conditions
cannot be overstated. They are the essential hallmark of all dynamic
systems.
Surrounding the plates, and in the space between them,
energy fluctuations exist within the QV as waves, each moving in a
random direction and impacting the surfaces of each plate from all
sides. However, the waves between the plates will begin to calm
(figuratively speaking) as the plates are drawn closer together. The
calming effect the plates have on the QV between them is due to the
fundamental quantum nature of photons.
Each photon comprising the QV is a wave and QM states
that, it is impossible for a half-photon, or any fraction of a photon,
to exist. Each photon can only exist as a whole wave represented by a
complete 360 cycle10. Thus, no QV modes11 with wavelengths wider
than the gap can exist between the plates! There cannot be one-third
of a wave between the plates, for example. If the distance between the
plates is one micrometer, for instance, then only modes with a
complete wavelength less than one micrometer may physically exist
within that space.
As the plates are drawn very close together, more and more
energy modes become excluded from existence between the plates,
and conversely, more energy modes exist outside the plates than in
between them. Thus, a net difference in energy density between the
outside and inside the boundary is established by the plates. Because
there is, in effect, more energy on the outside than the inside,
pressure builds on the outside of the plates, pushing the plates
together with a force inversely proportional to the separation distance
between them. That is to say, as the gap between the plates gets
smaller and smaller, the force pushing on them becomes greater.
However, this Casimir Force is only observed when the distance
between the plates is exceedingly small. Likewise, the magnitude of
the force pushing them together is equally minute.
10
11
33
34
www.deltagroupengineering.com
2.1
35
divine structure of the heavens, was born of his ability to predict the
precise behavior of falling objects. Newton wondered what would
happen if a cannon atop an enormous mountain reaching high into the
sky fired a cannon ball with any amount of force he wished. He
demonstrated mathematically that firing the cannon ball straight ahead
with sufficient force, the ball wouldnt land until it reached half way
around the globe, or with even more force, fully around the globe. If
the cannon ball could be shot with sufficient force, Newton imagined,
the ball might never land! Instead it would enter into orbit around the
Earth, perpetually falling around the globe.
36
www.deltagroupengineering.com
because it was unclear how the force of gravity was transmitted across
such vast distances of emptiness. However, the concept of force
remained the central focus in Newtons laws of motion and would
remain an inescapable conclusion of Newtons thinking despite its
thorny point of contention.
In order for an object to change from one velocity to another,
it needs a push to overcome the acceleration reaction force termed
inertia. Objects in uniform motion, or at rest, will remain in uniform
motion unless otherwise acted upon by an outside force; this is
Newtons first law. Of course, if one considers common earth-bound
examples such as the acceleration of a boat or car, there are other
factors at play like friction between the object and the surface it
travels upon, adding to the complexity of this relationship. However,
in simplest terms, Newtons first law states that it is fundamentally
necessary to supply energy to an object to alter its uniform motion.
Lets suppose you are riding inside a rocket, traveling at
constant velocity through interstellar space, and you suddenly spot an
asteroid in your path. You would immediately power the thrusters in
an attempt to avoid the collision. If your seatbelt did not happen to be
properly fastened at the time you fire the thrusters, you would be
abruptly slammed up against the opposing side of the ship. By firing
the thrusters you are using chemical energy to impart a force on the
exterior surface of your rocket, pushing the rocket into a new
trajectory and allowing you to successfully dodge the oncoming
asteroid. But when traveling inside the ship, without a seatbelt, you
are really only moving with the same relative uniform motion as the
ship. So for a moment, when the ship suddenly veers to one side, your
inertial mass wants to maintain its straight-line path of motion. The Gforce you feel as you are slammed to one side of the cockpit is a result
of your being squeezed between the side of the cockpit pushing you in
a new direction, and the inertial reaction force countering your change
in motion, impinging on you from the opposite direction. The energy
from the thrusters is really only necessary to counter the inertial
reaction force experienced when changing direction; however, this
isnt only true in free space.
We feel inertial forces all the time. In a car, you feel inertial
force when you accelerate, make a sharp turn or slam on the brakes.
Its the same inertial force which makes you sink into your seat in an
airplane when you are about to take off. Imagine for a moment that
you are riding in a car and feeling the force of inertia pushing you into
your seat when you accelerate. Now, imagine that everything
disappears aside from you in your seat no car, no road, no landscape
outside the window, nothing just you being pushed into your seat as
www.deltagroupengineering.com
37
you speed up. Moreover, lets say you take your foot off the
accelerator and you resume a constant rate of speed. Suddenly, the
force you had felt pushing you into the seat subsides and you feel no
force, other than gravity holding you in your seat. Since nothing else
exists that you know of in the Universe no road, no other cars or
trees going by as you look to your left or right; how do you know if
you are moving? The only way you can really tell if youre moving is
if you accelerate or change your motion and thus, feel the force of
inertia.
Let us also assume that even though you cant actually see
the steering wheel, you can still feel it in your hands. If you were to
suddenly rotate the steering wheel to make a sharp turn, an invisible
force would abruptly push you in the opposite direction of your turn.
The turn itself merely marks a change in the otherwise constant
motion you were in before you turned the wheel. Whether you are
traveling in empty space or on Earth, inertial force is felt when
accelerating or change in motion occurs. The force felt is immediate
and local to you, wherever you might happen to be in the Universe.
Trying to escape the force of inertia would be like trying to out-run
your own shadow. It cant be done. It is the inescapable nature of
matter itself.
But where does this strange force come from? Strange and
mysterious as it may seem, this powerful force arises instantaneously
out of the vacuum of space, as if by magic, to physically inhibit
changes in motion.
2.2
38
www.deltagroupengineering.com
The ratio of an objects speed to the speed of sound in the fluid the
object is traveling in.
13
An indication of sound wave frequency.
14
The number of sound waves heard per second.
www.deltagroupengineering.com
39
40
www.deltagroupengineering.com
were found to be whole other galaxies much like our own. This
discovery expanded the scale of the known Universe by several orders
of magnitude. Before Hubbles time, the Universe was thought to be
only slightly larger than our15 galaxy. At that time, the Milky Way
was the Universe and when Hubble demonstrated that these fuzzy
nebulae, once thought to be part of our own galaxy, were in fact
distant galaxies themselves, the range of the Cosmos expanded
beyond all comprehension.
Along with his colleague, Milton Humason, Hubble set out
to measure the distances of these galaxies by studying the Cepheid
variable stars within them. Cepheid stars fluctuate in brightness and
possess a narrow range of intrinsic luminosity. Because these stars
possess such similar luminosity, their relative brightness may be
applied as a standard by which to measure the distance of the galaxies
containing them the dimmer the Cepheid, the more distant the
galaxy. However, this isnt what Hubble is historically noted for
discovering.
Hubble is famous for having combined his Cepheid data with
measurements taken by Keeler, Campbell and Slipher, which measure
the red-shifts associated with the same galaxies Hubble was
observing. What he discovered, as a result of this marriage of
observations, would come to be known as Hubbles Law; which
brought about the Big Bang history of the Universe we are so familiar
with today.
Heres how he did it: Light waves, like sound waves, can
Doppler shift. As a light-emitting object moves through space, the
light waves emanating in the direction of movement are compressed
in frequency. Hence, light waves compressed to a higher frequency
are thus shifted towards the blue end of the visible spectrum.
Similarly, light emitted in the trailing direction of the objects motion
is decompressed and shifted towards the red end of the visible
spectrum.
Hubble noticed that the light coming from the most distant
galaxies, based on his Cepheid data, were more red-shifted than ones
close by and the magnitude of red-shift was directly related to the
galaxys distance from us; implying that all the galaxies in the
heavens were moving away from us. However, the implication was
not that the galaxies are moving away from us per se, but that space
itself, in which we reside, is expanding in all directions.
Strangely, this requires that every point in the Universe
represents the point of origin of the Big Bang! Thus, all matter in the
15
Milky Way.
www.deltagroupengineering.com
41
42
www.deltagroupengineering.com
you were the sole object in the Universe, if you accelerate, you will
know it immediately because you will feel the force of inertia.
The physical nature of inertia has remained a mystery for
eons. Historically, inertia is considered to be an intrinsic property of
matter, full-stop, no explanation required. However inertia, with its
uncanny nature, holds the key to understanding the physicality of
space itself! Elucidating the inner workings of inertia will lead
directly to the most complete generalized understanding of the
Universe ever to be gained by humanity.
Although Machs Principle of inertia was never formally
developed into a quantitative, physical theory, there is a strongly
compelling aspect to it which cannot be disregarded. Despite its
inadequacies, Machs conceptualization was at least partially correct
in its premise that inertia was a manifestation of the same force we
experience as gravity.
2.3
43
44
www.deltagroupengineering.com
felt in the direction of, or against, motion when the car is traveling at a
uniform speed.
Gravity is synonymous with inertia because it is a sensation
of being accelerated even though you may be sitting stationary in a
chair; and because gravity is acceleration, the feeling of force one
experiences while being held stationary at the surface of the Earth is
the same force one would feel due to inertia if one were to accelerate
at the same rate in free space! Einstein imagined a similar thought
experiment to illustrate the Equivalence Principle, and in so doing,
developed the framework for what would come to be known as GR.
Imagine you are in a large box, like an elevator, without
windows, and you cant look outside to determine anything about
your movement within the environment. All you know about your
movement is based on what you can feel from inside the box. While
standing inside a stationary box at the surface of the Earth, you feel
the acceleration of gravity pushing you to the floor at 9.8 meters per
second, per second [i.e. 9.8(m/s2)].
Now imagine that you are floating around weightless inside
the box, which itself is floating in empty space. Then suddenly the
box begins to accelerate in one direction so that the opposing side of
the box moves up to touch your feet. Lets say the box begins
accelerating through space at a rate of 9.8 meters per second, per
second. Without knowing anything about your environment, you are
quickly able to stand up on the floor. What you would feel in that
instance would be indistinguishable from what you would feel
standing stationary on the surface of the Earth! The inertial force of
acceleration is the same, whether you are accelerating through free
space, or sitting stationary in a gravitational field.
When Einstein applied the Equivalence Principle to his
geometric interpretation of curved space-time, he was able to
demonstrate in a very elegant manner why gravity is, in effect, the
same force as inertia. Lets go back to the explanation of curved
space-time and geodesic motion mentioned earlier. As an asteroid
enters the Earths gravitational well, its path will be bent around the
Earth according to the most direct geodesic path possible within the
curved space-time manifold. The asteroid, however, doesnt actually
experience a force as its trajectory is altered. To the asteroid, it is
simply following the path of zero resistance in a curved topology.
Lets also imagine that the asteroid enters into orbit around the Earth.
Even though it travels in an ellipse circling the Earth, it still feels no
force keeping it in that path. If the asteroid approached the Earth on
an impact trajectory, heading directly towards the Earth, even though
it is being accelerated by gravity it would still not feel any force!
www.deltagroupengineering.com
45
In this case, the force of your fingers holding the feather in place.
i.e. in a straight line in flat space-time.
46
www.deltagroupengineering.com
gravitational well can escape not even light. As matter or light falls
towards the black hole, it will be forced to follow such a steeply
curved, inwardly-bent topology in space that it could never acquire
sufficient energy to escape the well.
Perhaps an easier or more intuitive way to describe what is
going on here is by way of fluid-dynamics19. Sound waves travel
much more quickly in water than they do in air because the molecular
density of water is higher than air. This simply means that molecules
of water are much more closely packed together per unit volume than
air molecules. The speed of sound in water is approximately 1,500
meters per secondix roughly three times faster than in air.
19
47
48
www.deltagroupengineering.com
2.4
Mass-Energy equivalence
49
50
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
51
52
www.deltagroupengineering.com
3.1
53
3.2
54
www.deltagroupengineering.com
21
55
56
www.deltagroupengineering.com
57
where matter and space finally converge. It has only been through
such investigations into matter that the fine threads and fibers
weaving the proverbial fabric of space-time have begun to be
revealed. The true, quantum nature of space is uniquely strange and
wonderful so strange, in fact, that it is doubtful whether we could
have deduced its curious characteristics based on symmetry alone.
3.3
58
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
59
60
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
61
also much higher in energy than visible light, and thus carry greater
momentum.
Its like the difference between firing a football and a bullet
at the same speed. The football would likely bounce off an object or
explode on contact, but a bullet has a much better chance of
penetrating most materials if shot with sufficient force. X-ray photons
may also cause physical damage to the cells they pass through,
specifically to the DNA, in very much the same way that a bullet
causes damage when it strikes an object. X-rays actually tear right
through DNA and potentially have the ability to cause harmful
mutations in genes, which may result in cancer. This is why your
doctor or dentist wants to know the last time you had an X-ray taken.
Its important not to let your average X-ray radiation dose exceed a
given damage tolerance threshold of the cell, in order to minimize the
risk of diseases caused by genetic mutations.
Max Planck derived a mathematical relationship for light
momentum and energy in the form of his equation E = hv, which
states that the energy (E) of light is equal to its frequency (v),
sometimes denoted (f), multiplied by Planck s constant (h). Plancks
constant is a measure of light energy as a function of frequency, but
more importantly, it describes how the energy is packaged.
For example, a volume of
water may be divided and divided
again until one is left with a single
water molecule composed of one
oxygen and two hydrogen atoms.
However, it is not possible to
further sub-divide that molecule
and still have water. You can have
one molecule, or two, or how ever
many you like, but it isnt possible
to have two and three-fourths
molecules of water. Plancks
constant effectively describes the
notion that light energy, as related
to frequency, comes in whole
increments (i.e. quanta) per whole
cycle of the wave. Wavelength is
measured from crest to crest, or
trough to trough, so the cyclic
quality of a wave must be factored into the equation, and this is served
by including Plancks constant. The most important point to
remember is that the frequency of light is synonymous with its
62
www.deltagroupengineering.com
24
63
25
26
64
www.deltagroupengineering.com
65
27
66
www.deltagroupengineering.com
wrapped around the nucleus; the only maintainable orbits are the
harmonic frequencies physically fitting the circumference.
This quantum, harmonic model explains the stability of
electrons in the atom, and why in-between states of electrons dont
exist. With this new perspective, the orbital model of electrons was
replaced by energy levels a harmonic model as a result of QM.
Bohr also realized that the energy levels associated with the
electrons in atoms describe the absorption and emission spectrum of
the hydrogen atom. The hydrogen atom was used to model this effect
because of its simple configuration having one electron circling a
single proton. As the electron jumps from a lower harmonic state to a
higher one, the frequency and energy of the electron increases.
However, in order to alter the energy level of the electron, energy
needs to be added or subtracted.
The law of conservation of energy ensures that energy cannot
magically appear out of, or disappear into nothing; it must come
from somewhere. When an electron jumps from a higher to lower
energy level, it is also jumping from a higher to lower frequency.
When this occurs, energy is released as light.
The phenomenon of photon emission from atoms was
actually quite well understood even before Bohr fully developed his
theory describing why it occurs. Atomic photon emission wavelengths
obey a precise harmonic pattern, which was determined by the
Swedish physicist, Johannes Rydberg. In the Rydberg formula, the
wavelengths of the photons radiated from atoms as electrons jump
between energy levels can be accurately predicted by simply
substituting whole-number harmonic intervals into an equation, along
with the Rydberg constant for a given atomic element.
Rydbergs formula, used to predict the frequencies of light
emitted from atoms, was subsequently explained by Bohrs model of
the atom. Bohr demonstrated that the harmonic pattern derived by
Rydberg and others28 works because the frequency of the photons
released from the atom directly corresponds to the frequency
difference between electron energy levels! It is as if the atom is a
musical instrument which may be strummed with light to produce a
musical scale of colors.
On a musical instrument, each sound-wave is produced at a
particular frequency, differing from others based upon the harmonic
interval between the notes. Instead of sound waves, an atom emits
28
67
68
www.deltagroupengineering.com
3.4
Quantum uncertainty
69
70
www.deltagroupengineering.com
3.5
71
72
www.deltagroupengineering.com
73
74
www.deltagroupengineering.com
75
rest because that would imply that the photon had been destroyed.
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed; hence, the photon
perpetually fluctuates around its lowest permissible energy state
inside the box.
The inevitable emergent conclusion from what we know
about QM and Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle is that any physical
system in the Universe must possess some minimum intrinsic energy
which cannot be removed. This perpetual fluctuation of photonic
energy in space is termed Quantum-Vacuum-Energy (QVE). QVE
exists even when all thermal motions between atoms and molecules
has completely ceased. For this reason, QVE is also termed ZeroPoint-Energy (ZPE), emphasizing that the energy comprising the
vacuum is present at absolute zero temperature. Throughout this book,
we shall refer to the sub-thermal ZPE as Quantum-Vacuum-Energy
(QVE) to emphasize its derivation from QM and its reference to the
vacuum.
Plancks blackbody radiation principle entails that vacuum
energy is intimately tied to mass energy, and that the vacuum energy
filling space surrounding matter is just as important as the matter
residing within it. All systems possess a ground state of energy
attained by equilibration with its environment. For example, many
possible sizes of energy-trapping boxes may exist in space and
many minimum energy states may exist within those boxes. A solitary
photon inside each variation of box possesses different QVE
parameters defined by the box it occupies. Thus, different vacuum
states (i.e. vacua) must exist, associated with specific classifications
of matter. A single atom, for example, interacts with the vacuum by
establishing its own boundary condition by equilibration, analogous
to the manner in which an empty box floating in space establishes an
interactive boundary condition within the QVE33.
The prediction of QVE leads to a foamy description of
space, saturated with frenetic, evanescent fluctuations. If you switch
your television to an unutilized channel, youll see thousands of dots
of static buzzing about like bees in a hive. This imagery is physically
reminiscent of whats occurring at the quantum level in the vacuum of
space; a chaotic jumble of fluctuations at all points in the Universe,
whether within inter-galactic voids or within the space between subatomic particles!
Stranger still, vacuum energy exhibits particle-like attributes,
with virtual particles instantaneously crackling into existence and
33
76
www.deltagroupengineering.com
Emerging from, and then dissipating into the vacuum so rapidly that
we may never be able to detect them directly.
www.deltagroupengineering.com
77
78
www.deltagroupengineering.com
4
4.1
Although QVE is obliged to exist by the rules of QuantumMechanics (QM), our psychological acceptance of the QV appears to
be more a suspension of disbelief rather than a sincere conviction. The
QV seems a bit too weird to be true. Yet the Casimir Effect has
provided substantial physical proof that QVE is real, or at least virtual
but with real, measurable effects. The most dramatic insight to be
gained through this level of understanding is that space affects matter
just as matter affects space. A deep, mutual connection exists between
matter, space and energy which cannot be severed. Matter and the QV
are two aspects of a fundamental concept, as if two sides of the same
coin.
The existence of Quantum-Vacuum-Energy (QVE) is
revealed by the application of spatial boundary conditions as
demonstrated by the Casimir Effect. From such spatial partitions,
forces are generated due to the formation of Quantum Vacuum (QV)
asymmetry, causing the two parallel metallic plates to be pushed
together. If only one plate were utilized, the QV would remain
symmetrical and appear identical from either side of the plate, and no
force would be generated on the plate. However, bringing two parallel
plates close together causes the QV between them to change. Fewer
QV photons exist between the plates than outside them due to the
boundary the plates establish. All but the smallest wavelengths of
energy are excluded from the space between the plates. The field
asymmetry between the inner and outer vacua generates a net pressure
on the outer surface of the plates, and as the inner and outer vacua
attempt to equilibrate to identical energy states, the plates are pushed
together in the process as if carried along by an increasingly swift
current.
However, the Casimir Effect isnt the only development
lending credence to the existence of QVE and its influence upon
matter. Professor Stephen Hawking has become one of the most
famous theoretical physicists of the late 20th century, and a legend in
his own time, yet many people would not be able to say precisely why
his has become a household name in our current day and age. If one
were to ask the same question about Einstein, one would almost
invariably get an answer pertaining to E = mc2, something about
Relativity or the atomic bomb etc. So what brilliant insight into
Nature has earned Hawking the privilege of sitting in Sir Isaac
www.deltagroupengineering.com
79
80
www.deltagroupengineering.com
81
82
www.deltagroupengineering.com
4.2
36
83
84
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
85
86
www.deltagroupengineering.com
5
5.1
Mass Illusion
A matter of terms
It is very easy for us to take for granted this truly strange and
mysterious attribute called mass. It is so fundamental to our everyday
experience that few people pause to consider it. Of course, scientific
progress has yielded a vast working knowledge of matter extending
into the furthest depths of scale. We have come to know the inner
structure of the atom, and that the atom is the basic building block of
matter. This knowledge not only permeates, but also creates the
foundation upon which our modern civilization is built. It has enabled
the development of the field of chemistry, and through application of
this knowledge we can create a seemingly infinite array of useful
compounds and materials. Indeed, our modern way of life on Earth is
rooted in this deep working knowledge of matter. However, when we
talk about matter we arent necessarily talking about mass. Mass isnt
so much a thing like matter is; it is an attribute of matter, in much the
same way that temperature is an attribute of matter. Temperature may
vary due to the amount of thermal energy a given material possesses,
but temperature doesnt define the atomic or molecular structure of
matter. Likewise, mass is a measure of the energy embodied by
matter, and represents a physical attribute associated with all matter at
all levels of scale.
Matter experiences inertial reaction forces upon acceleration,
gravitational attraction to other objects, and is subject to relativistic
effects. Not only does it warp space-time to generate a gravitational
field, but depending on an observers motion relative to an object, the
mass of that object may appear to change when the observer alters
their motion relative to it. Moreover, Relativity states that mass is
energy and energy is mass.
If mass is nothing more than a synonym for energy and is
subject to relativistic effects, then how does it assume the physical
attributes we associate with matter? Why does matter resist
acceleration and why does it gravitate? Although Einstein and Newton
invented marvelous and ingenious methods for modeling and
predicting the behavior of mass, their models do little to explain why
mass behaves the way it does, or what causes matter to have the
particular set of attributes it does. If GR cannot explain the physical
origin of the collection of attributes we call mass, then what can? The
answer seems to be inscribed within the very fabric of space and time.
All we must do to uncover the answer is decipher Natures language.
www.deltagroupengineering.com
87
5.2
Intrinsic inertia
88
www.deltagroupengineering.com
37
89
90
www.deltagroupengineering.com
91
This tells us that the observed space relative to our reference frame is
flat. When the elevator accelerates in free space, the path of the
light beam bends and our reference frame then tells us that the
observed space-time is curved.
Space-time in a gravitational field always appears to be
curved, and curvature defines the depth of the gravitational well
produced in space. The more massive the object, the greater the
curvature and the apparent acceleration experienced. Similarly, as
acceleration rates increase, the greater the apparent curvature of space
will be38. The whole of GR theory is based upon the pathways of light
within our perceived reference frame in space.
Now, lets re-visit our model of intrinsic inertia for the
electron. Whether the electron is moving in an accelerating elevator in
space, or falling to the Earth in a gravitational well, it is always
moving in accordance with our perceived view of the space-time
around it. To us, an electron may appear to fall to the ground due to
gravity, but the electron perceives itself as being in equilibrium with
its environment and not experiencing a force causing it to fall.
Human experience causes us to believe that the force of gravity is
pulling the electron to the floor. No pull, no force and no
gravity exists per se; we simply observe an electron moving in
equilibrium with the geodesic path of lowest energy encasing it,
which happens to be curved (i.e. asymmetrical) in this case.
If the electrons field is uniform and it enters a region of
space-time asymmetry (such as a gravitational field), it responds to
environmental conditions by falling in search of an equilibrium
state within that asymmetric space-time. Similarly, any imposed
perturbation of the electrons natural path produced by altering its
intrinsic energy to an asymmetrical state within a flat space-time
background (what we term acceleration), requires energy input.
When an electron is held stationary in a gravitational well
(e.g. the surface of the Earth), ambient space-time appears curved and
the object continually responds to it. When the electron falls freely in
curved space-time, it feels no force because it adjusts to the
background field asymmetry. Utilizing the box and spring example, if
the box moves then the ball attached by springs inside is compelled to
keep pace and co-move within its frame to equilibrate with the
asymmetric energy of the springs. However, when an object is held
fixed within a gravitational field, it senses that the immediate spacetime is always asymmetric, and this asymmetry of space-time results
in gravity.
38
92
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
93
5.3
Extrinsic inertia
94
www.deltagroupengineering.com
spacecraft could sail on the solar wind, and move through vast
distances of space without needing to carry fuel. In 2005, the
Planetary Society built and launched a privately funded solar sail
spacecraft named Cosmos-1. The spacecraft was designed in the
form of a giant reflective umbrella, to be unfurled in space and catch
the solar wind. The radiation pressure impacting the sails surface per
unit time is miniscule, but the cumulative force applied to the sail over
a long period will produce staggering velocities perhaps even
enough to reach nearby stars. Unfortunately, Cosmos-1 was lost after
a faulty launch, so we must continue to dream of sailing amongst the
stars on the winds of light at least for now anyway.
It is possible to estimate the force Cosmos-1 would
experience from the solar wind by calculating the power associated
with light39 as it propagates. This is made possible by utilizing the
Poynting vector40 developed by the English physicist, John Henry
Poynting in 1884. When you switch on your flashlight, you are
generating a beam of light that propagates from the bulb towards
whatever object you wish to illuminate. The Poynting vector is a
quantitative measure of the power of flow (i.e. the flux) associated
with the combined electric and magnetic wave components of light as
it propagates from the flashlight to the object.
The QV of flat space-time comprises a near infinite spectrum
of photons of various energies and random orientations, meaning
there is no cumulative or net direction to the QV. So in flat space-time
the QV photons can be disregarded from most calculations. This
doesnt mean that the spectrum of QV photons doesnt exist; it simply
means that the QVE may be considered virtual because a net force
does not arise from a random, baseline QV. Thus, in free space, the
QV is said to be isometric (i.e. equal in all directions).
In the early 1990s, Haisch and Rueda applied the concept of
radiation pressure to the QVE derived from QM. They wondered how
the QV might appear when viewed from an accelerated reference
frame, in much the same way that Einstein wondered how light paths
behaved inside an accelerating elevator in free space. What they found
was shocking. By applying textbook Electro-Dynamic principles, they
determined, by transforming QVE from a stationary to an accelerated
reference frame, that it acquired asymmetry. The field was no longer
random and isometric, rather, the QVE in the accelerated frame
39
40
www.deltagroupengineering.com
95
96
www.deltagroupengineering.com
from a fluid like air or water. Whatever we wish to call it; space-time
geometry, the aether or what have you, the nature of space must also
satisfy the rules of inertia, and all physical laws that have been
experimentally validated thus far. What then, should the vacuum of
space be like in order to satisfy the condition of inertia?
The answer has to do with the way in which energy is
distributed throughout the QV. Unlike the blackbody spectrum of the
Sun, for example, peaking in a specific region of the EM spectrum
and based entirely on temperature, QVE is predicted by QM to be
distributed throughout space in a fundamentally different manner.
When we plot the blackbody energy distribution41 for the Sun, we find
that it emits photons spanning a wide range of the EM spectrum,
peaking in the ultraviolet, visible and infra-red range42.
QVE has a rather different distribution along the EM
spectrum, however. The QV is predicted to possess a frequency
cubed energy distribution throughout free space; at low QV
frequencies, the spectral energy density of QV photons is minimal and
at high QV frequencies it is maximal. The spectral energy density of
QV photons follows the cube of the frequency along the EM
spectrum, and doesnt peak at any particular bandwidth as a
blackbody radiation spectrum does.
For example, lets say we want to calculate the QVE density
in the microwave region of the EM spectrum. Microwaves exist in the
10(GHz) range (approximately). To simplify matters, we may say
that the density of QVE at 10(GHz) along the EM spectrum is
proportional to 10 x 10 x 10. The frequency cubed distribution of
the QV means that moving up the EM spectrum to waves with a
frequency of 100(GHz), the proportional energy density of QV
photons is 100 x 100 x 100! Thus, the highest frequency ranges of
the EM spectrum contain the most QVE, implying that the energy
density of free-space is inconceivably energetic. It has been
estimated43 that the amount of QVE contained in a coffee cup sized
41
www.deltagroupengineering.com
97
5.4
44
98
www.deltagroupengineering.com
99
100
www.deltagroupengineering.com
placed in the same water, it will be jostled about by the small waves it
encounters as if weathering a violent storm at sea. The size of the toy
boat is on the same scale as the waves it floats upon, causing it to feel
the undulating terrain of the rough and choppy sea surrounding it.
On the molecular scale an analogous effect exists, termed
Brownian motion. Robert Brown was a Scottish botanist who
collected and catalogued thousands of plant species in Australia in the
early 1800s. He was highly skilled at microscopy and utilized it as a
tool to study plant pollens. In studying pollen grains under the
microscope, he noticed that the individual pollen grains appeared to
jitter wildly in suspension, yet maintained their overall position within
the field of view. He noted that the movement seemed to be an
intrinsic quality of the grain itself, resembling a freely moving lifeformxvi. However, he also noticed that particles only slightly larger
than pollen grains do not move in this manner. Like the toy boat,
pollen grains are of a particular size, which allows them to experience
the kinetic motion of the water molecules they are suspended within.
As the water molecules impact the pollen grain from all sides, the
pollen grain jitters wildly, while larger objects are unperturbed. In
Browns time, the cause of this effect was not entirely clear, but
thanks to his initial observation, this effect has since been dubbed
Brownian motion.
Again, the temperature of any substance is a measure of the
average kinetic energy of the molecules comprising that substance.
Within fluids like air and water, molecules dart about bouncing off
one another; the higher the temperature, the more frenetic the
molecular activity. Some molecules possess sufficient momentum
such that when they strike the surface of a pollen grain it recoils.
Since water molecules are too small to be viewed through a
microscope, we may infer their movement because we observe the
pollen grains rapidly quivering and jittering in place as they recoil
upon impact.
Over a period of time, if one tracked the motions of a pollen
grain under Brownian motion, one notices generalized movement in
some direction; referred to as a random walk. This range of motion
represents the statistical average of the combined small-scale
movements of the pollen grain, resulting in travel from point A to
point B.
The QVIH was developed utilizing Stochastic
Electrodynamics (SED). The term stochastic refers to a
mathematical treatment incorporating random behavior over time.
Random stock market fluctuations or the walk of Brownian motion
may be modeled utilizing this technique. Haisch and Rueda, in their
www.deltagroupengineering.com
101
102
www.deltagroupengineering.com
48
www.deltagroupengineering.com
103
due to the difference between the frequency with which the video
frames are captured by the camera (in frames per second), and the
frequency at which the wheels of the car rotate (in revolutions per
second). Video cameras typically capture approximately thirty still
frames per second, which during play-back are blended together by
our visual cortex to re-produce the effect of motion.
If the wheels of the car were turning at a rate of 25
revolutions per second as the car is captured on video, the wheels will
not have revolved completely by the time the next video frame is
captured; the wheels would only have turned about 85% of the full
cycle. If a marker were placed on the wheel to keep track of its
position with time, it would show that the wheel shifts about 55
counter clockwise with each captured frame of video. Thus when the
video is played back, the wheel will appear to be rotating backwards
at roughly four revolutions per second. By changing either the
frequency of the video capture or the speed of the car, the effect may
be run faster or slower in the clockwise or counter clockwise
direction. If the revolutions per second and frames per second are
equally matched, the wheel will appear motionless as the car drives
along.
In this regard, Haisch and Rueda have filmed49 the
Compton frequency of an electron against the background frequency
of the QV in a moving reference frame. In doing so, the electrons
wavelength appears to an outside observer to be the de Broglie
wavelength. Here, Haisch and Rueda suggest that the de Broglie
wavelength is ultimately derived extrinsically from the QV. However,
this particular example represents just one of many suggestions for
how the QV might help us understand the deep mysteries of the
quantum Universe.
The QVIH suggests the possibility that the property of
inertial mass, and other quantum phenomena such as the de Broglie
wavelength, arise extrinsically through an interaction between the
subatomic particle and QVE. This stochastic modeling system
yields quite profound results, but not without stirring some
controversy, because it represents a very literal way of approaching
the problem. But if we are ever going to fully understand gravity and
inertia, we must be open to innovative interpretations like Petkovs
intrinsic model and the Haisch-Rueda extrinsic model.
Creative interpretations of reality are commonplace in
contemporary physics, and we are quite accepting of them because we
are cognizant of the fact that they are merely human rationalizations
49
104
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
105
106
www.deltagroupengineering.com
6
6.1
107
108
www.deltagroupengineering.com
6.2
Optical gravity
If you dip a long stick into a swimming pool, you will notice
that it appears to bend as it enters the water. The same is true if you
happen to be spear fishing you would need to aim your spear at a
slightly different place than where you see the fish if you wish to hit
your target. This phenomenon arises because in both cases you are
seeing light (an image) which has been refracted (i.e. bent) by the
water.
Light is refracted as it passes from one substance through to
another of different density. A substance like water possesses a
specific index of refraction based upon its density. When light transits
from air into water, it moves from a medium of lower to higher
density.
As photons of light move through substances such as air,
glass, or water, they dont simply pass through unaffected light
interacts with the atoms and molecules comprising it; the light might
be absorbed and re-radiated, or reflected. When light passes from air
into water, it takes longer for the photons to interact with the water
because it is more densely packed with molecules than air; as this
occurs, the light slows down, causing it to bend. Its a bit like the
difference between running on land and trying to run in a swimming
pool. You cant run as fast in water as you can in air because water is
denser.
The degree to which a beam of light is bent depends not only
on the density of the medium it passes through (its index of
refraction), but also the angle of approach (i.e. angle of incidence).
The science of optics is based upon the principles of refraction and
angle of incidence. Thanks to optics, we have eyeglasses, telescopes
and a whole host of other magnificent technologies which improve
our daily lives.
Sir Isaac Newton worked extensively to create the science of
optics. Newton studied the manner in which lenses of different shape
and density bend and refract light in various ways, and how curved
mirrors reflect and focus light. However, the foundations of optics are
based upon interactions occurring at the quantum level, which
Newton knew nothing of. The theory fully describing the fundamental
interaction between light and matter is termed Quantum
Electrodynamics (QED), and is one of the most accurate theories in
physics.
The application of optical principles to those of GR as led to
an alternative and more intuitively appealing interpretation of the
space-time manifold referred to as the Polarizable Vacuum (PV)
www.deltagroupengineering.com
109
110
www.deltagroupengineering.com
6.3
51
111
52
112
www.deltagroupengineering.com
6.4
Conflux
54
113
114
www.deltagroupengineering.com
the local space-time encapsulating you in a vacuum, the light you emit
always propagates away at c. However, to a distant observer, the
light you emit appears refracted by the space-time you move through.
The tone of the light appears to shift because the observer views the
light source as moving into a region of KPV which is different from
the observers local value. The spectral shift of the light emitted from
an accelerating source is solely dependent on the relative difference
between the KPV values of the observer and the source.
Consider a light source moving naturally into a region of
variable KPV (a gravitational field). To the source object, nothing
appears to change in terms of its own size, the way light moves, or the
way time flows. However, to a distant observer, light from the source
appears to refract as it moves into the gravitational field. An object
moving naturally within a region of variable KPV experiences no
external forces because natural motion in such a case requires moving
along a geodesic path in curved space-time. Thus, the geodesic path
of GR may be expressed in terms of KPV, rather than explicitly in
terms of space-time curvature. The primary advantage of the PV
model over GR, in this regard, is its conceptual simplicity.
An observer might presume that a force acts on a naturally
moving object causing it to shift into a curved trajectory around a
planet or star, but the object itself doesnt experience any force. It is
only when the object is displaced from equilibrium within its local
environment that it experiences a force. All objects seek the lowest
energy equilibrium state within an environment; this is why
acceleration requires energy input and inertia is experienced during
acceleration. Thus, energy input is required to maintain disequilibrium
and once the energy input ceases, the object resumes a state of
uniform motion, in equilibrium.
No matter where uniform motion occurs or how fast an
object may appear to be moving with respect to its environment, a
uniformly moving object will be in equilibrium with the energy
configuration of its environment. It perceives the Universe as being
flat even though it may appear curved to a distant observer. Therefore,
we may summarize equilibration in terms of the PV model of gravity
and GR as follows; uniform motion is synonymous with QV
equilibrium and acceleration is synonymous with QV
disequilibrium.
From Relativity theory we know that an object can never
accelerate to the speed of light because it becomes infinitely massive;
in order to accelerate an object to the speed of light, an infinite
amount of energy is required to push it that fast. This is truly one of
the most bizarre predictions of Relativity and one of the most difficult
www.deltagroupengineering.com
115
58
116
www.deltagroupengineering.com
59
117
As one elevator moves faster than the other, the photon has a
greater distance per unit time to travel between each wall. A photon
propagates in a vacuum at the speed of light; thus, the modified factor
between each elevator is the time required for the photon to bounce
between the walls60. In the slow-moving elevator, the photon has a
shorter overall distance to cover, but in the fast-moving elevator the
photon travels a greater distance overall, taking into account the larger
vertical distance it has to travel. If we are measuring time as the
interval between photons striking each wall, time in the fast-moving
elevator appears to an outside observer to slow down. However, if we
were inside either elevator, we would not notice any difference in the
passage of our own time; we would only be aware of photons
bouncing from side to side. Likewise, if we examine the behavior of
the slow-moving elevator from inside the fast one, it appears that time
has slowed down for the other elevator while ours remains the same;
from inside the slow elevator, time in the fast-moving elevator also
appears to have slowed down.
Time is thus relative, not only because it is relative to an
observers motion, but because it is relative to the constant speed of
light in a vacuum. If we were riding in a space ship headed towards a
black hole, we would observe that we move towards it and fall in61.
However, to an outside observer watching the scene unfold, we first
appear to shrink62 and the light we emit begins to red-shift, but we
would never actually appear to fall into the black hole! This is
because, to the outside observer, our time first appears to slow down
and then stop at the moment we reach the event horizon!
Within GR, these strange effects are due to the propagation
of light in a curved space-time manifold. In the context of the PV
model, the same effects occur but they are a function of KPV, not
curvature. Imagine that a region of flat space-time was analogous to a
large rug laying flat on the floor. Lets say an ant is walking from one
end of the rug to the other, moving at the maximum speed its legs
permit (the ant represents a photon traveling at light speed). If we
scrunch up the rug and measure the time required by the ant to
traverse a distance relative to the bare floor, the distance per unit time
the ant travels appears to be less than if the rug were lying flat.
When the KPV value increases, QVE density increases.
This is analogous to scrunching up the fabric of space-time. Even
60
118
www.deltagroupengineering.com
though the speed of light does not appear to change locally within a
region of varying vacuum polarization63, to a distant observer in flat
space-time, light appears to slow down64 and the distance between
two points decreases65. By considering the difference between local
and observed vacuum polarization states of space-time, it becomes
obvious why an object appears to behave as though its time was
slowing down, its length was contracting or its emitted light was
being refracted and shifted in frequency. Its like spear fishing in a
tide pool; the image of the fish we see is refracted, and if we aim for
what we see we will miss the target. However, if we aim for where the
fish should be after refraction is considered, we have a much better
chance of hitting it.
The PV model demonstrates the manner in which the KPV
value of the QV is congruent with the concept of curved space-time
which Einstein invoked to explain acceleration and motion through
gravitational fields. Most importantly, the PV model leaves us better
equipped to understand the physical basis for the perplexing
conclusions of GR. Mathematically, the laws of motion elegantly
unfold through the implementation of GR but the basis for these laws
remains difficult to grasp from the perspective of relativistic
curvature. However, when we replace the concept of curvature
with the principles of optics, the consequences of relativity make
intuitive sense when viewed through the lens of the PV.
63
www.deltagroupengineering.com
119
120
www.deltagroupengineering.com
7
7.1
121
122
www.deltagroupengineering.com
7.2
68
69
Musica Universalis.
Orbital resonances may be stable or unstable.
www.deltagroupengineering.com
123
124
www.deltagroupengineering.com
The orbits of other planets in our solar system have selforganized and evolved over the eons into highly regular harmonic
ratiosxxi, and though not all planets in the solar system possess highly
regular orbital resonances, our solar system continues to evolve into a
state of increasing stability as time progresses. Harmonization in the
orbital periods of planets in our solar system has been recognized and
appreciated since ancient times. This clockwork syncopation
mesmerized early philosophers and physicists such as Johannes
Kepler.
In his 1619 treatise entitled
Harmonice Mundi,70 Kepler sought to
explain the arrangement of the planets
according to an organizing principle
stipulated by the Pythagorean model and
the geometric conventions of Platos five
perfect solids. Kepler believed that the
circumference of each planetary orbit
was prescribed by the ratio resulting
from nesting the five perfect solids inside
one another.
In Keplers model, a cube with a
sphere fitting snugly inside indicated the
orbital circumference of an arbitrary
planet. Within that sphere fits another solid such as a tetrahedron, and
the sphere nested within the tetrahedron indicated the orbital
circumference of another planet. Within the orbit defined by the
tetrahedron another perfect solid would fit, thus defining another
planetary orbit and so on, until all the planets were accounted for.
70
125
7.3
71
126
www.deltagroupengineering.com
127
7.4
Fouriers legacy
128
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
129
130
www.deltagroupengineering.com
85
131
132
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
133
134
www.deltagroupengineering.com
Electro-Gravi-Magnetics (EGM)
8.1
Introduction
135
8.2
Similitude
136
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
137
88
138
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
139
8.3
140
www.deltagroupengineering.com
98
99
141
8.4
Space-time engineering
100
142
www.deltagroupengineering.com
102
www.deltagroupengineering.com
143
144
www.deltagroupengineering.com
8.5
Gravity
145
110
146
www.deltagroupengineering.com
Qu. 20.
Doth not this aethereal medium in passing out of
water, glass, crystal, and other compact and dense bodies
into empty spaces, grow denser and denser, by degrees,
and by that means refract the rays of light not in a point,
but by bending them gradually in curved lines? And doth
not the gradual condensation of this medium extend to
some distance from the bodies, and thereby cause the
inflexions of the rays of light, which pass by the edges of
dense bodies, at some distance from the bodies?
Qu. 21.
Is not this medium much rarer within the dense bodies
of the Sun, stars, planets and comets, than in the empty
celestial spaces between them? And in passing from them
to great distances, doth it not grow denser and denser
perpetually, and thereby cause the gravity of those great
bodies towards one another, and of their parts towards the
bodies; every body endeavouring to go from the denser
parts of the medium towards the rarer? For if this medium
be rarer within the Suns body than at its surface . . . and
rarer there than at the orb of Saturn, I see no reason why
the increase of density should stop anywhere, and not
rather be continued through all distances from the Sun to
Saturn, and beyond. And if the elastic force of this medium
be exceedingly great, it may suffice to impel bodies from
the denser parts of the medium towards the rarer, with all
that power which we call gravity.xxiv [sic]
Newtons optical model of gravity has a modern counterpart
known as the Polarizable Vacuum (PV) Representation of GR a title
originally coined by physicist Hal Puthoff in 1994, based upon an
earlier body of work introduced by the physicists, Harold Wilson and
Robert Dicke in the 1950s. The PV model replaces the concept of
space-time curvature with a variable Refractive Index caused by
the polarization of the QV surrounding an object.
Newton wrote that a gradually changing density in the aether
results in gradually curving paths of light. A changing Refractive
Index induced by gradual changes in the polarized QV surrounding
matter also results in the refraction of light, as though it were passing
through a lens. This bent EM radiation follows a geodesic path
congruent to that predicted by GR according to the space-time
curvature interpretation. EGM similarly interprets the PV models
www.deltagroupengineering.com
147
This is the mainstream view, not the view of the EGM construct in
the Quinta Essentia series (i.e. QE3,4) where the opposite
conclusion is mathematically derived. That is, QE3,4 mathematically
demonstrate that free space does not contain a near infinite amount
of energy in a vanishing volume.
148
www.deltagroupengineering.com
destroyed. The total energy of the Universe is, and always has been,
constant. Neither more nor less energy existed in the early Universe,
during the first few trillionths of a second after the Big Bang than
exists today. The energy of the Universe hasnt gone anywhere; it has
only become more diffuse112 over time as the Universe expanded. As
this occurs, energy isnt conjured from nowhere to fill the everwidening gaps the energy of the Universe merely becomes diluted
with cosmological expansion.
Precise measurements of the Hubble constant and Cosmic
Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) temperature allow us to
quantify the expansion of the Universe since the instant of the Big
Bang. We calculate the Hubble constant by measuring the red-shift of
light from galaxies moving away from us as they are pulled apart by
the expanding fabric of space. Thus, the Hubble constant is a measure
of the rate of cosmic expansion and the CMBR temperature is a
measure of the EM energy left over from the Big Bang only now,
the once high-frequency radiation filling the young Universe has been
stretched out into the microwave frequency range as a result of
cosmic expansion.
Utilizing EGM to analyze the energy dynamics of Hubble
expansion spectrally, we may model the primordial spectrum of the
seed-Universe113 as a single, high-frequency wavefunction
containing the total energy of the Universe. At the moment of the Big
Bang, this single wavefunction rapidly began to decompose114 into a
broad spectrum of lower-frequency waves, forming localized energy
gradients within the QV where matter condensed. This spectral
decomposition model is a mathematical representation of the energy
dynamic which occurs due to expansion, and is not intended to be a
literal interpretation. The many modes of lower-frequency waves in
the present-day QV spectrum115, when summed, must contain the total
energy present at the instant of the Big Bang (excluding the energy
condensed as matter).
112
i.e. red-shifted.
i.e. prior to the Big Bang.
114
i.e. bifurcate.
115
In flat space-time.
113
www.deltagroupengineering.com
149
150
www.deltagroupengineering.com
116
www.deltagroupengineering.com
151
123
152
www.deltagroupengineering.com
125
126
153
154
www.deltagroupengineering.com
155
wavelengths too large to fit between the plates are excluded. The
reduced energy density between the plates biases the QV131, pushing
the plates together with increasing force as the separation distance
decreases. Gravity, in this regard, is akin to a long-range Casimir
Effect because EGM describes gravity as being the result of a change
in mode population across a region of the QV.
In fact, EGM derives the Casimir Force from first principles,
demonstrating that it differs depending on the gravitational field
strength of the location in which it is measured. For example, EGM
asserts that the strength of the Casimir Force on Jupiter will be
smaller than on the surface of the Moon (see: QE3). The gravitational
effect on the Casimir Force is due to the population of modes
comprising the PV spectrum. The denser the mass, the fewer modes it
has in its PV spectrum because each mode within it possesses higher
energy (i.e. frequency). The modal bandwidth of the PV spectrum for
a very dense object is narrower than that of a less dense object. Thus,
at the surface of Jupiter, fewer low-frequency vacuum modes exist
than at surface of the Moon, resulting in a smaller Casimir Force on
Jupiter than the Moon.
What Sir Isaac Newton originally envisioned over three
hundred years ago in his speculations regarding optical gravity is
mirrored in the PV model of GR. EGM doesnt merely elaborate on
PV theory, it puts real numbers to it, allowing one to precisely
quantify and define the PV. The variable Refractive Index of the PV
model acts as a replacement for the metaphysical concept of spacetime curvature under GR. EGM models the changing gradient of the
PV as a summation of harmonic modes via Fourier series to represent
a constant function (i.e. g) at any position in space surrounding a
mass-object. However, it is important to re-emphasize that EGM is a
mathematical construct only. EGM does not propose that mass is
literally comprised of spectral modes interacting with the QV, it is
merely a tool by which to distil and deconstruct the fundamental
energy dynamics of GR, EM and QM; combining like characteristics
in order to solve a problem.
The EGM method provides a unique framework for
understanding the physics of gravity. The vacuum of space, as we
now understand, is an embodiment of energy, and so is mass. The
problem with previous interpretations of gravity has to do with the
131
156
www.deltagroupengineering.com
8.6
Elementary particles
157
158
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
159
160
www.deltagroupengineering.com
161
162
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
163
8.7
Cosmology
164
www.deltagroupengineering.com
165
166
www.deltagroupengineering.com
galaxies, in all directions, and all points within space are becoming
further separated from all other points not moving away from a
common origin. Similarly, all points in space would converge to a
single point if traced backwards, but this point would not be located
at some particular coordinate in space because every point in the
Universe may be considered the center of the Universe.
The expansion of the space-time metric (not the ejection of
matter into static space) provides the reason for why the ultra highenergy photons of the early Universe are now detectable as lowenergy microwaves filling space. All energy and matter are part and
parcel of the fabric of space-time, and as space-time expands, matter
and energy are also subject to that expansion.
In this regard, we may consider Hubble expansion to be
intimately tied to T0. The current temperature of space defines the
blackbody radiation spectrum of the Universe, and vice versa. The
radiation comprising the spectrum is composed of far red-shifted
photons that were present in the blackbody spectrum of the early
Universe shortly after the Big Bang. At that time, those photons were
much higher in frequency (energy) because the temperature of the
early Universe was extremely high. There was no more energy in the
early Universe than there is today, however. To state otherwise
contradicts the First Law of Thermodynamics. The total energy of the
Universe remains the same, but the energy is now spread out across a
much larger volume. Consequently, the energy density of the Universe
has changed, not the net amount of energy it contains.
This relationship between energy-density and temperature is
a well characterized principle of fundamental astrophysics. As a star
forms, clouds of hydrogen condense into a massive sphere of gas,
similar to the planet Jupiter. A pressure threshold must be achieved
before this dense ball of hydrogen (the protostar) is hot enough to
initiate hydrogen fusion. Increasing gravitational pressure on the
hydrogen gas of the protostar causes an increase in temperature. When
the pressure and temperature of the protostar reach the threshold
required to fuse hydrogen into helium, the protostar ignites and the
star is born. The temperature of an active star, which is established as
a function of pressure, also determines the stars blackbody radiation
spectrum. All these factors are completely reliant upon a common
state of equilibrium.
Stars between ten and twenty times more massive than our
sun meet their end in the form of a gargantuan explosion termed a
supernova. As any star fuses its store of hydrogen into helium, an
enormous amount of energy is released from the star, resulting in
explosive outward pressure. The outward force of the energy released
www.deltagroupengineering.com
167
138
168
www.deltagroupengineering.com
between the expansive pressure of the energy of the star and the
contractive gravitational pressure.
The life cycle and destiny of most stars may be determined
utilizing a straight-forward relationship born of the principle of
equilibrium. The Sun is a middle-aged star that has fused about half of
its hydrogen supply into helium, and still has about 4.5 billion years
left before its hydrogen is depleted. As hydrogen becomes depleted,
and the outward pressure from helium fusion overcomes the
compression of gravity, our Sun will swell into a red giant.
Eventually the outer layer of the red giant, composed of helium and
other freshly-formed elements, will slough away from the core
leaving a ring of gasses referred to as a planetary nebula. The core
of the Sun will remain as a white dwarf star at the center of the
nebula, continuing to burn the remaining carbon from helium fusion
until it is also depletedxxvii.
The active hydrogen-burning phase of a stars life cycle is
termed its main sequence. As a star like the Sun becomes a red
giant, it moves from its main sequence phase into its red giant phase.
During a stars main sequence, its brightness (luminosity), mass, size
(radius) and temperature are established as a function of equilibrium.
For example, the Sun is G2V class star140, which means
that it is a main sequence star whose temperature is 5,700(K) at its
surface. Wiens displacement law demonstrates that the peak of the
Suns blackbody spectrum occurs in the yellow-white photographic
light range. The star Rigel in the constellation Orion is seventeen
times more massive than the Sun and six times its radius, with a
temperature of 11,000(K). The mass-density equilibrium of Rigel
relates to its temperature, and the temperature relates to its apparent
color, which is in the blue range. The color blue is higher in frequency
than yellow, and this difference in frequency between Rigel and the
Sun is a function of Wiens displacement law. As temperature
increases, the peak emission of the blackbody spectrum shifts
upwards in energy. This is termed color temperature. Its just like a
flame: the blue part of the flame is the hottest, whereas the yellow and
orange parts of the flame are relatively cooler.
This tangential foray into astrophysics has been for the
purpose of conveying a crucial point, which is that seemingly
independent physical parameters of the star are intimately connected,
and a change in one will affect the others. The mass-density and
radius of a star in its main sequence relates to the stars temperature.
From the temperature we may predict the stars color which, in turn,
140
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun
www.deltagroupengineering.com
169
is derived from the stars blackbody radiation spectrum. As massdensity increases, so does temperature. This causes the stars
blackbody spectrum to shift to a higher-energy and narrower peak
frequency bandwidth according to Wiens displacement law. This
example from fundamental astrophysics reinforces the concept that
objects are systems they are neither static nor inert. This is the
fundamental premise of EGM and the basis upon which all EGM
calculations are performed.
As discussed earlier, any mass-object may be described by its
PV spectrum, which is a direct function of mass-energy density. The
equilibrium point of the star affects its radius, temperature and
blackbody spectrum. The PV spectrum of a star depicts a very similar
relationship. As the mass-energy density of any object increases, its
harmonic cut-off frequency increases and the modal bandwidth is
compressed. Thus, the PV spectrum of a neutron star, for example,
possesses a higher harmonic cut-off frequency and a narrower modal
bandwidth than our Sun, which is less massive.
This is why the EGM principle is universal. We may model
any object, whether its a galaxy, a cluster of galaxies, a black hole, a
neutron star, the Sun, a planet or a subatomic particle using the same
fundamental equation. However, the real value of the EGM method
lies in its ability to relate mass equilibrium states to one another, as
demonstrated by the subatomic particle harmonic relationship. It is by
way of this harmonic relationship that we may extrapolate
cosmological parameters like the Hubble constant and the CMBR
temperature as well.
Because EGM models a mass-object as existing in
equilibrium with the QV, the local energy state of the vacuum may be
considered to be equivalent to the mass-energy of the object it
encapsulates. For instance, this equivalency relationship is mirrored
by the stable equilibrium state of a star, such that the outward energy
produced by fusion is equal to the inward gravitational energy acting
to contain it. One may also conceptualize this by considering a
seesaw or lever with a fulcrum placed at its center. The lever may
be balanced horizontally if objects of equal weight are placed on each
end. The weight of object A on one side must be exactly the same
weight as object B on the opposing side for the lever to remain
stable and horizontal. In this regard, the mass-energy of an object
must be equivalent to the vacuum energy encapsulating it in order for
it to rest in equilibrium.
170
www.deltagroupengineering.com
171
the mass-energy density and vacuum equilibrium state of the presentday Universe.
The Universe is quite isometric142; we observe that all
galaxies are, on average, evenly distributed throughout the Universe,
and that they are all roughly in the same stage of evolution. Thus, we
may assume that the evolution of all galaxies has been subject to the
same ground rules and has followed roughly the same time-line as our
own. Because of this, our own Milky Way galaxy acts as a reference
particle, yielding an average present-day value of the gravitational
intensity throughout space-time.
Astronomers have been able to produce a fairly good
estimate of the total mass of the Milky Way, and have been able to
calculate the distance of our sun to the center of the galaxy. We may
mathematically represent total galactic mass as being contained within
a single particle, placed at the galactic center. This reference
particle (the GRP) may be represented as radiating gravitational
energy equivalent to its total mass. The intensity of gravitational
energy at any radial position, such as the Suns mean distance from
the galactic center, may be calculated from the PV spectrum of the
GRP. Thus, the GRP is proportionally representative of the total
mass-energy density and QV equilibrium state of the Universe at the
present time.
Pressure, as it has recently been described within this
chapter, is directly related to temperature. Temperature, as we also
know, is directly related to the blackbody spectrum. A mass-object of
any type may be represented by its PV spectrum, which may also be
physically interpreted as a spectrum of gravitons. The parameters of
the PV spectrum directly relate to the gravitational intensity of the
mass-object. In other words, the modes comprising the PV spectrum
indicate the gravitational intensity present at any point from the center
of the mass-object. As one moves away from the center of mass, the
gravitational intensity decreases, and the number of PV spectral
modes increases. This equilibrium gradient denotes a balance of field
pressures between the QV and the mass-object. H0, in a sense, is a
measure of the expansive pressure of the space-time manifold.
Thus, we may utilize the GRP to determine the average cosmological
matter-space-time equilibrium value and derive H0. In this regard,
H0 describes the observed energy condition of the vacuum in its
entirety, as does T0.
Deriving H0 in this manner provides the required input for
the derivation of T0. Once again, we shall commence by stating that
142
172
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
173
174
www.deltagroupengineering.com
175
176
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
177
178
www.deltagroupengineering.com
9.1
Overview
www.deltagroupengineering.com
179
148
180
www.deltagroupengineering.com
Figure 1.1,
A constant function is termed even due to symmetry about
the Y axis; subsequently, its Fourier approximation need only
contain certain terms at odd harmonics151, presenting the added
advantage of mathematical and energetic efficiency152. Thus, the
preceding periodic square wave may be reconstructed utilizing the
symmetry characteristics of a constant function as depicted by the
proceeding graph153 such that g is physically measured as a constant
function at the surface of the Earth. A Fourier series approximation of
g may be obtained by computing the magnitude of the preceding /
proceeding periodic square waves154 as the number of harmonic
modes tends to infinity.
149
181
Figure 1.2,
Therefore, g (i.e. a constant function) may be
mathematically characterized as a fully rectified periodic square wave
composed of odd Fourier harmonics. Due to symmetry (as illustrated
above / below), g may be constructed utilizing half the period of the
fully rectified square wave155.
Figure 1.3,
155
i.e. the complete square wave cycle is not required to describe the
system.
182
www.deltagroupengineering.com
183
184
www.deltagroupengineering.com
9.2
The QV spectrum
9.3
www.deltagroupengineering.com
185
9.4
9.5
The PV spectrum
186
www.deltagroupengineering.com
159
187
xxxvi.
xxxvii.
xxxviii.
xxxix.
Therefore, when the EGM and ZPF spectra are merged, the
continuous ZPF spectrum is compressed and equated to the Fourier
distribution of the EGM spectrum such that the resulting PV spectrum
is a decompressed form of the merged spectra and the properties of its
spectral limits may be determined. This process mathematically
transforms the continuous ZPF spectrum to a discrete and finite
Fourier distribution of equivalent energy. Thus, as radial displacement
r at a mathematical point from a mass-object increases;
xl. Gravitational field strength decreases.
xli. Spectral energy density decreases.
xlii. The number of harmonic modes increases (i.e. bifurcation).
xliii. Greater numbers of modes are required to be summed for
energetic equivalence.
The EGM interpretation of gravity is similar to Newtons
thoughts of an optical model such that the aether was presumed to be
denser farther away. The gradient in aether density causes light and
objects to follow trajectories characteristic of GR. EGM demonstrates
that the increasing density of Newtons aether is analogous to
increases in mode population in the PV spectrum. Hence, the PV is an
EM frequency spectrum obeying a Fourier distribution at
displacement r describing a mass M induced gravitational field
such that;
xliv. It denotes a polarized form of the ZPF spectrum161.
161
188
www.deltagroupengineering.com
9.6
9.7
189
9.8
Comparative spectra
Note: labels of the form 2.xx, 3.xx, 4.xx refer to QE2,3,4 respectively.
EGM bandwidth comparisons of PV spectra associated with
physical categories of objects may be formulated and represented
graphically based upon ZPF equilibria. Determination of the ZPF
equilibrium radius of subatomic particles is a sophisticated process,
summarized in QE2. A complete and rigorous derivation is presented
in QE3.
Utilizing the EGM construct, the HRP spectral energy
density equation with cubic frequency distribution may be graphically
categorized into four regions (i.e. zones), these are; Planck-scale
energy densities, particle physics, astrophysics and cosmology,
subject to the following generalized characteristics166 [see: Fig. (2.1,
2.2)],
li. Planck scale energy densities167 [see: QE4]
Narrowband high-frequency spectrum.
Narrowband modal spectrum.
lii. Particle physics
Broadband high-frequency spectrum.
Narrowband modal spectrum.
165
190
www.deltagroupengineering.com
liii. Astrophysics
Moderateband168 high-frequency spectrum.
Moderateband modal spectrum.
liv. Cosmology [see: Tab. (2.6, 2.7)]
Narrowband low-frequency spectrum.
Broadband modal spectrum.
Sample plots,
A
B
Cosm. Astro.
ZPF
PV
Flat
Curved
Table 2.6,
C
PP
PV
Flat
D
PS
PV
Curved
168
191
E
F
PS
PP
PV
PV
Curved
Flat
Table 2.7,
G
Astro.
PV
Curved
H
Cosm.
ZPF
Flat
192
www.deltagroupengineering.com
9.9
193
9.11 Cosmology
9.11.1 Fundamental
The primordial and present values of the Hubble constant are
derived (H and HU respectively), leading to the determination of
the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) temperature
TU. This facilitates the determination of the impact of dark matter /
energy on HU and TU such that a generalized expression for TU
in terms of HU is formulated. An experimentally implicit derivation
of the ZPF energy density threshold UZPF is also presented. The
derivation sequence proceeds as follows,
lxix. Derivation of H and HU.
lxx. Derivation of TU.
lxxi. Numerical solutions for172 H, AU, RU, U, MU, HU and
TU.
lxxii. Determination of the impact of dark matter / energy on
HU and TU.
lxxiii. TU as a function of a generalized Hubble constant.
172
194
www.deltagroupengineering.com
9.11.2 Advanced
A time dependent derivation of TU is performed, including
its rate of change and relationship to HU. This facilitates the
articulation of the cosmological evolution process into four distinct
periods dealing with the inflationary and early expansive phases.
Subsequently, the history of the Universe174 is developed and
compared to the Standard Model (SM) of Cosmology (SMoC). This
assists in determining the cosmological limitations of the EGM
construct. The question of the practicality of utilizing conventional
radio telescopes for gravitational astronomy is also addressed. The
derivation sequence proceeds as follows,
lxxvi. Time dependent CMBR temperature.
lxxvii. Rates of change of CMBR temperature.
lxxviii. Rates of change of the Hubble constant.
lxxix. Cosmological evolution process.
lxxx. History of the Universe.
lxxxi. EGM cosmological construct limitations.
lxxxii. Are conventional radio telescopes, practical tools for
gravitational astronomy?
9.11.3 Gravitational
An engineering model is developed to explain how
gravitational effects are transmitted through space-time in terms of
EGM wavefunction propagation and interference. The derivation
sequence proceeds as follows,
lxxxiii. Gravitational propagation: the mechanism for interaction.
lxxxiv. Gravitational interference: the mechanism of interaction.
173
195
9.11.4 Particle
The following characteristics are derived utilizing EGM
principles,
lxxxv. The photon and graviton mass-energies lower limit.
lxxxvi. The photon and graviton Root-Mean-Square (RMS) charge
radii lower limit.
lxxxvii. The photon charge threshold.
lxxxviii. The photon charge upper limit.
lxxxix. The photon charge lower limit.
196
www.deltagroupengineering.com
xciii.
xciv.
xcv.
xcvi.
xcvii.
xcviii.
xcix.
175
www.deltagroupengineering.com
197
c.
ci.
cii.
ciii.
civ.
178
198
www.deltagroupengineering.com
180
In terms of equilibration.
www.deltagroupengineering.com
199
200
www.deltagroupengineering.com
Electron
Harm.
Quark
Harm.
St = 1
2
4
6
8
St = 1/2
1
2
3
4
St = 1/14
1/7
2/7
3/7
4/7
10
12
14
28
42
56
70
84
98
112
126
140
5
6
7
14
21
28
35
42
49
56
63
70
5/7
6/7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Table182 4.5
181
201
Table 4.9,
(i) *Where, SC denotes coupling strength at 1(GeV)183.
James William Rohlf, Modern Physics from to Z, John Wiley
& Sons, Inc. 1994.
183
202
www.deltagroupengineering.com
SMoC
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
EGM
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
where, H0, T0, q0, 0 denote the present values of Hubble constant,
CMBR184 temperature, deceleration parameter and cosmological
constant respectively.
184
203
204
www.deltagroupengineering.com
3.
189
www.deltagroupengineering.com
205
Figure 4.23,
206
www.deltagroupengineering.com
Figure 4.26,
www.deltagroupengineering.com
207
Figure 2.4,
208
www.deltagroupengineering.com
Figure 2.5,
www.deltagroupengineering.com
209
210
www.deltagroupengineering.com
www.deltagroupengineering.com
211
212
www.deltagroupengineering.com
Bibliography 1
i
213
214
www.deltagroupengineering.com
90000
ID: 2671468
www.lulu.com
9 781409 205340
ISBN 978-1-4092-0534-0