Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Miguel Barron-Villeda, A093 342 975 (BIA Feb. 18, 2011)

Miguel Barron-Villeda, A093 342 975 (BIA Feb. 18, 2011)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 149|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) granted the respondent's appeal from a motion to lower a $7,500 bond imposed by DHS where the immigration judge erroneously concluded that the respondent, who had a pending U visa application, was eligible for no forms of relief from removal, and did not consider letters of support from family members living lawfully in the United States. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley and joined by Member Patricia Cole and Member Anne Greer.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) granted the respondent's appeal from a motion to lower a $7,500 bond imposed by DHS where the immigration judge erroneously concluded that the respondent, who had a pending U visa application, was eligible for no forms of relief from removal, and did not consider letters of support from family members living lawfully in the United States. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley and joined by Member Patricia Cole and Member Anne Greer.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Jul 25, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/12/2013

pdf

text

original

 
BARRON-VILLEDA, MIGUEL
A
093342975
 
BOX 5010OAKDALE
L
71463Name: BARRONVLLEDA, MGUEL
 Dpatmnt
f
utic
Execte Oce  grto Ree
Board ofImmigration AppealsOce of the Clerk
5 /07 leesb Pike, Sie 2000 Ft Cmrch, Vginia 22041
FEDERAL DET CENTER-OAKDAE 2P.O. Box 1128OAKDALE, LA 71463A093-342-975Date of this notice 2/182011
coe   cop o he Bor eco  oe  the oeerece ceEcoee Meer:Coe, trc A.Geer e
J
e RogeScereDo CChe Cek
Cite as: Miguel Barron-Villeda, A093 342 975 (BIA Feb. 18, 2011)
 
U.S Dam
f
uic
Executive Oce r Immigration ReviewDecision of he Board o mmigration AppealsFas Chrch,
Virginia
22041
File: A093 342 975 -Oakdale, LAIn re MGUEL BARRONVILLEDAN BOD PROCEEDGSAPPEALON BHALF OF RESPONDENT:Pro seO BEHALF OF HS:orraine  rinAssistat Chief CouseAPPLICAION: Redeterminatio of custodyDate
FEB18 ZOP
e responet, a ative and citize of exico, appeals om the Immigratio Judge's bond decision dated October 27, 2010 The Imigratio Jdge issed a bo memoradm seing r the reasos r the bond decisio o November 29, 2010 he appeal wi be sustaine ad erecord wi be remaded.Te Board reviews a Immigratio udges digs of ct icdig nigs as to the credibiiy of testimoy, uder te "ceary erroeos standar8 CFR § 1003.(d)(3)(i) eBoard reviews questios of aw, discretio, ad jdgmet and al other isses i appeals omecisios of Immigratio udges
de novo
8 CFR § 1003(d)(3)(ii);
Matter ofA-S-B-,
 24 &Dec 493 (BA 2008)As backgroud, the eparmet of omelad Securty (the DHS) ad set bond i therespodets case at $500 I respose to the respoent's reqest r a bod redeteiatio theImmigratio Judge deie the request r bod becase she d that the respodent had no chidre or faiy ties i te Uite States and no aveue to reief om remova; therere, theImmigratio Judge conclded that the respondet was a ight rsk (. at 2). O appeal, therespodet argues that he as severa cousins a other reatives wo are ivig egaly in teUited States ad tat he is te beneciary of a pedig "U visa petitio, wich wol provide him animmigrat visa i conectio wit assistance he provided to law enrcement in Arkansas who areivestigatig a homicideThe respodet requests remand so that a hearing ca be hed toetermie wheter he merits a discretioary bon prsuat to sectio 236(a) of the mmigatio an Nationaiy Act Te DS opposes te respondents appeal.Te respondets custody proceedigs are goveed by sectio 236(a) of te Act
See Matter ofAdeni
 22 & Dec. 1102 11113 (BA 999) Therere the respodent bears the bure toshow that he does ot present a threat to the commuity ad a risk of ight om rhe proceedings.
Id.
n interpretig whether a aie has met this bre, we have d that ess the aieemonstrates tat he is no a danger to the commuity pon cosideratio of te relevant ctors, e
Cite as: Miguel Barron-Villeda, A093 342 975 (BIA Feb. 18, 2011)
 
A
0�3 342 975
shoud be deaine in he usoy of he DS
See Matter of Drysdale 20
I&N De
81587
(IA
994 )
Oly where he aien has proen ha he is no a anger o he ommuny oes helikelihood ha he wil absond beome reean
d
Poeniay dangerous alies may be eld n he usoy of the DS whou bon during he pendeny of remoal proeeings
See Carlson
v.
Landon 342
S
524 53742 (1952)
ere he Immigraion Judge deie bond beause she ud ha he respone was ineligibler any rm of reief om remoa ad beause he ha o hidren and o ily ies in heied Saes
See
J a
2
Whie he respoes hanes of reief ay be iie i igh of he eidene of he penig isa peiio i is o ore o n ha he has
no
prospes r reief omremoalFuher in ligh of he eers of suppor om mily members liing legay in heied Saes i aso oes no appear orre o sae ha he responden has no mily here Theseors play a signian roe i eeminig i he alie poses a igh risk and aoringy shoul be grane a spei bo
Matter ofPatel 
I&N De 666 (BA
1976)
The Immigraio ugeshoul proie an ohereor explanaion o her weighing o hese s and hereaer adress he respondens risk of gh and wheher here is a bond amou ikey o ause him o appea rure remoal proeeings
Matter of Patel supra
Aordingly he lowing orers wil be eneredOER The respondens appea is susaiedFRERORDER: he reord is remanded r her proeedings onsisen wih his order
=
2
Cite as: Miguel Barron-Villeda, A093 342 975 (BIA Feb. 18, 2011)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->