Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
02/23/09 - The Stanford Daily [PDF]

02/23/09 - The Stanford Daily [PDF]

Ratings: (0)|Views: 70 |Likes:
Published by The Stanford Daily

More info:

Published by: The Stanford Daily on May 19, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





tanford Athletics will sell seats inSection 13 of Maples Pavilion forthe men’s basketball games againstNo.20 UCLA and USC this week-end.Tickets in this section will only be avail-able to season-ticket holders andBuck/Cardinal Club members.Section 13was previously reserved for Sixth Man mem-bers,provoking an outcry from sections of the student body.The Sixth Man is organized and run bystudents,with assistance from the Stanfordmen’s basketball program.Last Tuesday,theathletic department announced that theSicth Man will be restricted to Sections 9-12.The Stanford Band usually occupies Section9,but there is room for some Sixth Manmembers as well.On Wednesday,Sixth Man ManagingDirector Alexis Link ‘10 released a state-ment to the group’s email list,protesting thedecision.The email included a survey inwhich students,alumni,University employ-ees and others were asked to respond to theathletic department’s decision.One of thequestions asked students if the decision tosell seats in Section 13 to season-ticket hold-ers and donors bothered them.With 1000votes tallied,89.5 percent of respondentssaid,“Yes,it is a student section.Furthermore,Link claimed that she andthe other Sixth Man organizers were notinformed by the Athletic Department of thecoming sale.“I was never informed by the members of the athletic department who were responsi-ble for this decision,”Link wrote in an emailto The Daily on Friday.She claimed shefound out about the sale of tickets in Section13 from a member of the men’s basketballprogram and was never directly contacted.“There were discussions earlier in theseason regarding selling Section 13 to theBuck Cardinal Club,Link admitted.However,she said the idea was “shot downcompletely after vehement opposition fromboth the Sixth Man Committee and the
Condoleezza Rice will formally return toStanford on March 2,said her chief of staff,ColbyCooper.Rice has been settling into her HooverInstitution office in recent weeks,and her staff arrived on campus Dec.15 to prepare for herreturn.The former Secretary of State will not immedi-ately return to teaching but has publicly stated sheexpects to work on a book and eventually return tothe classroom.She will also participate in Hoovertask forces dealing with issues including nationalsecurity,according to Hoover Senior AssociateDirector Richard Sousa.Stanford administrators and some of Rice’s old-est friends applaud her renewed relationship withthe University,though others who oppose Bushadministration policies or clashed with her asprovost are less enthusiastic.“Prof.Rice’s return to Stanford will provide ourstudents and the academic community with a greatopportunity to learn from her experience in publicservice and international affairs,UniversityPresident John Hennessy told The Daily in a state-ment.“We are proud and pleased that she has cho-sen to return to her faculty appointment and to pur-sue her future teaching and research interests here.”
Future as a Political Science Professor
While Rice will not immediately return to theclassroom,a number of professors look forward toher interactions with students.Larry Diamond,a senior fellow at Hoover,believes Rice has a lot to contribute in terms of fos-tering policy debate,providing analysis and engag-ing students.“Many people will want to find ways to discussand evaluate her role as Secretary of State and,pre-vious to that,as National Security Advisor,in anextremely controversial period and one in whichthe United States did things that were very trou-bling,frankly,Diamond said.When Rice will resume teaching,however,is stillunclear.Coit Blacker,director of the Freeman SpogliInstitute,is one of Rice’s close personal friends and
Opinions/5 • Sports/6 •Classifieds/7
Recycle Me
Courtesy The Associated Press
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice waves goodbye as she leavesthe State Department in Washington on Jan. 16, 2009. Sinceleaving the capital, Rice has been making the transition back toStanford, where she is a tenured political science professor.
Rice’s history marked by conflict
Few equate Rumsfeld,Rice
Condoleezza Rice’s return to Stanford has been quietso far,despite the clamor over George W.Bush’s 2006visit and Donald Rumsfeld’s 2007 appointment at theHoover Institution.Following Rumsfeld’s selection as a DistinguishedVisiting Fellow in fall 2007,faculty and students circulat-ed petitions in opposition.Debate over his appointmentconsumed Faculty Senate and ASSU meetings.Despiteclaims by student activists that Rice was also complicit in“war crimes,the anti-Rice movement pales in compari-son to that targeting the former Secretary of Defense.Rice will be taking up a position at Hoover,just asRumsfeld did,but few equate her arrival with his contro-versial appointment.The former Secretary of State,afterall,is a tenured political science professor and a formerStanford provost.“[Rice] is returning to a long-established position,whereas Rumsfeld was appointed to something he hadnot held before and in a much more minor role as a dis-tinguished visiting scholar,”said senior Hoover FellowLarry Diamond.“I also think Rumsfeld’s service asSecretary of Defense was far more ignominious thanCondi Rice’s service in either of her positions,where Ithink the ultimate record is at least more mixed.”George Shultz,a distinguished fellow at Hoover,argued that Rice never truly left campus and comparedher return to his own experience coming back to Stanfordafter serving as Secretary of State under PresidentReagan.
Former Secretary ofState officially starts March 2 at Hoover 
Please see
,page 8Please see
,page 3
MASARU OKA/The Stanford Daily
With a near-empty Sixth Man section at men’s basketball games throughout the season, theathletic department decided to open Section 13 to season ticket holders.
Please see
,page 4
Stanford Daily File Photo
Condoleezza Rice stands in the Quad in October 1993, shortly after her appointment as Provost. Inher early days, Rice handled dramatic budget cuts.
“There was a big sigh ofrelief in many quarters [when sheleft] because she had not beena popular provost.”
political science professor emeritus
MONDAY Volume 235
February 23, 2009Issue 15
Freshmen jumpstart 25-0 run to lift women’sbasketball over Oregon, 68-49
 The Stanford Daily
 An Independent Publication
Men’s basketball falls apart on the road,dropping to Oregon, 68-60
 Rice’s time on Farm gets mixed reactions from students, profs.
Barton Bernstein still remembers where he wassitting—at the end of a long table,CondoleezzaRice to his right,and three seats away from thespeaker.It was the early 1980s,and the history pro-fessor and new political science assistant professor,respectively,had gathered at Galvez House,thebuilding that once housed the arms control center.Those gathered in the room went around thetable,discussing what they wanted to accomplish intheir life.Bernstein distinctly remembers Rice say-ing that she hoped to be Secretary of State orNational Security Advisor.“I remember thinking,‘Highly unlikely,’”headmitted over 20 years later.Rice would go on to fulfill not one but both of those goals.Her time in Washington would cap off nearly two decades spent as a well-liked Stanfordprofessor and sometimes-controversial provost.While her return to the Farm means a return tosome of her most beloved friends,it also marks areturn to some of her oldest enemies.
A Charismatic Lecturer
At age 19,Rice received her bachelor’s degree inpolitical science from the University of Denver,where she would receive her Ph.D.in 1981 afterreceiving a master’s degree in the same subject fromNotre Dame.The young scholar came to Stanford in1981 after receiving a Ford Foundation post-doctor-al fellowship,and she began teaching as an assistantpolitical science professor in 1982.Rice was tenured in 1987,becoming an associateprofessor.From 1989-1991,she served as a Sovietexpert on the National Security Council,and manylamented her parting.In a 1989 Daily article,shewas labeled a “charismatic and innovative teacher,”and one student recalled giving the popular profes-sor a birthday cake and singing during class.(“Riceoffered posts in Bush administration,”Jan.12,1989).Rice received the Gores Award for Excellence inTeaching in 1984 and the School of Humanities andSciences Dean’s Award for Distinguished Teaching
 Less outcry on campus over return of Bush’s top diplomant
Please see
,page 2
in 1993.Over a decade later,students stillremember her engaging lectures,particularlyin her class entitled “The Role of the Militaryin Politics.”Her classes enjoyed the politicalsimulations she conducted,and students laterpraised her intelligence and ability to synthe-size information.“She was always extremely prepared as aninstructor and a lecturer,”said Chris Aguas‘92.“She very clearly had a deep intimacywith the material in terms of the historicalbasis.”But it was her personable nature thatdrew many undergraduates to Rice.Her will-ingness to talk with students about every-thing from classes to football built her a fol-lowing in the political science department.“She was approachable;she was extreme-ly caring and warm and kind and [had] allsorts of qualities that I wouldn’t have neces-sarily expected in an advisor or professor,”said Erin Alaimo ‘88,who would later workin Washington.“She had a truly profoundimpact on my life,my career.”Emmanuel Bart-Plange ‘93 not only tookRice’s popular lecture course,but also stud-ied with her in directed readings.(He jokedhe’s still bitter about his A- grades.) The foot-ball player would also work with Rice andher father at The Center for a NewGeneration,an after-school enrichment pro-gram for East Palo Alto students that Riceco-founded.For Bart-Plange,Rice was more than anordinary professor.She kept in touch withhim over the years,and even got to know hismother.“When I got married she sent me a giftwith a card from the White House,”he said.“She didn’t have to do that,and she did.”Her love of sports and music enabledmany students to relate to Rice on a person-al level as well.Alan Brown ‘85,an advisee of Rice’s,said that he talked with the professorabout football as much as the Soviet invasionof Afghanistan.“It’s hard sometimes for kids to approacha Stanford professor,he said.“I never feltthat with Prof.Rice.You could question any-thing,you could discuss anything.She wasopen to ideas as opposed to spewing some-thing she’d already written.”“Her office door was always open,if I everneeded to talk about a paper I was writing orclasses I was taking,”added Eric Abrams ‘85,another advisee.“It was really cool to engageher in conversation about things outside of academia.She was a huge football fan.”These personal connections have changedhow many of Rice’s former students feelabout her time in the unpopular Bush admin-istration.Most jumped to her defense,sayingthey fully believed that she did what shethought was right for the country andbelieved her intelligence enabled her tomake the best decisions possible.“My feeling is she will be judged favorablyas someone who did the best job that she pos-sibly could have,”Alaimo said.“I have neverknown her not to do the best job,not to puther absolute everything into everything she’sever done.”And while some students are disappoint-ed with her political legacy,their memories of Rice as a professor remain untarnished.“She was absolutely one of my favoriteprofessors,maybe in the top two or three inthe whole time I was there,”said EdwardAnderson ‘91.“I think it’s unfortunate thatshe had such a long association with the Bushadministration,but I was excited to see herget into politics and do so well.Over time I’verespected her less,but she’s obviously anincredible person.”
The Young Professor
Many professors,too,would look fondlyon Rice’s early time at Stanford,even thosewho would later go on to criticize her tenureas provost.“Many,many afternoons,Condi wouldcome out of her office,sit down at the secre-tary’s desk,take off her shoes,and the two of them would cackle,”said Political ScienceProf.Emeritus Hubert Marshall,whose officewas close to Rice’s.“It was just little thingslike that that I liked about her.”Other professors vividly recalled fondmemories of their early exchanges with Rice.George Shultz,former Secretary of Stateunder President Reagan and distinguishedfellow at the Hoover Institution,said that hefirst met Rice after her stint in Washington onthe National Security Council for the firstPresident Bush.“The reason why I remember [her] sovividly is that [she] has such a capable andinteresting personality,”he said.“She is fun tobe with,she’s interesting,she’s got a lot to say.So,she’s a person that I like to have on my listof good friends.”History Prof.Emeritus David Kennedyagreed and admired Rice’s strong character.“She was one of the most poised and self-possessed individuals on the face of the plan-et,”he said.“That was evident to me from thevery first day that I met her,which I believewas her first day on the campus.”Kennedy said that during Stanford’s cen-tennial campaign in the late ‘80s and early‘90s,he often travelled with Rice to variousStanford events and tried to envision what aworld after the Cold War might look like.“We were a little bit ahead of our timebecause the Cold War hadn’t quite endedthen,”he said.“I got to know her best in thatcontext,and I was consistently impressedwith how well-informed she was and how bal-anced her judgment was and how extraordi-narily well-spoken she was.”Larry Diamond,a senior fellow at theHoover Institution,was also very impressedwith her poise,articulateness and ambition.He was also surprised to hear of her politicalaffiliations.“You would expect a young African-American political science professor,espe-cially back in those days,to be a liberalDemocrat,”he said,“and so,when I foundout she wasn’t,I was surprised and it certain-ly made her all the more interesting.”But Rice was not without detractors in herearly years.Her time in the first Bush admin-istration and political zeal sat poorly withsome of her fellow scholars.“I had no negative personal interactionswith her except that I found her very early onto be a very rigid ideologically oriented pro-fessor,said Political Science Prof.EmeritusJohn Manley.“It didn’t appeal to me verymuch.”And while many found the young profes-sor amiable,some were less than impressedwith her scholarship.“I’m still surprised that she would want toreturn to Stanford and a professorship,”wrote History Prof.Emeritus Paul Seaver,who would later butt heads with Rice overthe Cultures,Ideas and Values (CIV) pro-gram.“As I understand it,Russianists did notregard her as particularly distinguished as ascholar;on the other hand,I believe that stu-dents who took her courses regarded her as agood teacher.”Bernstein,who knew the professor fromvarious committees,seminars and personalinteractions,agreed.“Condi Rice is only somewhat better thana mediocre scholar,he said.“Her strengthsare vigorous right-wing opinionation,markedsocial poise and a fluency in oral presenta-tion.Among the Stanford scholars in theSoviet-Russian area,she would rank near thebottom in the University.Over the years,inmy talking with at least four people in thefield,each of them would rank her at or nearthe bottom and this was true before she wentto the Bush administrationand became prominent.”“Most of the peoplewho think she’s brillianthaven’t read her,haven’theard her,can’t judge,arebeing kind and are takenin by social poise andsuperficial fluency,”Bernstein added.
Appointment as Provost
Rice’s life wouldchange dramatically inMay 1993,whenUniversity PresidentGerhard Casperannounced that the politi-cal science professorwould take on the No.2 job at the University:provost.Casper met Ricea year and a half prior,when she was a memberof the presidential searchcommittee that selectedCasper.The President told TheDaily in 1993 that hebelieved her experience ingovernment would helpher deal with complexissues,and that the herselection signaled theimportance of diversity tothe University (“Caspernames Condoleezza Riceas new provost,”May 13,1993).In an exclusive inter-view with The Daily a fewdays after,Rice praiseddiversity and dismissedher politics as irrelevanttwo issues that studentswould view in a substan-tially different light inlater years (“Experiencedin the business of change,”May 21,1993).The first crisis Ricewould face,however,wasbalancing the budget.Soon after becomingProvost in 1993,Riceannounced that theUniversity would facemassive cuts to curbStanford’s deficit andhoped that administrativerestructuring would solve long-term prob-lems (“Additional budget cuts looming forUniversity,Oct.1,1993).The Daily reported that Rice said the situ-ation is so serious that if she wereapproached “tomorrow with the greatest ideasince the silicon chip,[she’d] have to say,‘Sorry,we can’t afford that.’”The Provost would announce that sheplanned to slash another $18 to $20 millionfrom the budget,drastically reducing centraladministrative costs over the next threeyears.Budget cuts would make Rice a fair num-ber of enemies,and few departments werepleased about the cost reduction estimatesthey were asked to submit.Some faculty feltthat little was left to cut after other cuts inrecent years.Students would also complainthat they were not involved enough in theprocess,to which Rice responded that thebudget “has to be on my timetable”(“Rice,Senate discuss cuts,Feb.2,1993).Further controversial changes by Riceincluded contracting out management of theFaculty Club and the Stanford UniversityPress (“Budget stable,provost says,Nov.11,1996).“I am often asked if [in contracting out],we are trying to run Stanford like a business,”Rice said.“The answer is no.We have to lookat ways to cut costs.”Coit Blacker,director of the FreemanSpogli Institute and a long-time personalfriend of Rice,told The Daily last week thatthe budget cuts were especially trying on theformer Provost.“[The budget cuts] earned Provost Rice alot of animosity or hostility from groups thatfelt that they had been targeted,”he said.“SoI think it was a very difficult time for her,butshe has never been one to shy away frommaking difficult decisions,if in her judgment,they are the right decisions,and that’s whatshe did.”But as the years passed,budget cuts grewless controversial.Rice sliced $6.1 millionfrom the budget in her first year,a figurethat decreased over the next few years.Sheultimately cut $16.8 million from the budg-et between 1994 and 1996,and theUniversity went on to enjoy multi-million-dollar surpluses.
The Diversity Debates
Though many lauded the pick of Rice asprovost as a sign of Stanford’s commitmentto diversity,tension soon built between Riceand women and minority groups on campus.When she pushed for more U.S.-bornminority faculty,some students claimed shewas fueling “anti-immigrant hysteria”(“U.S.born hiring policy questioned,Oct.6,1993).But the most heated controversy involvingRice and diversity in her early years wouldcome as a result of her budget cuts.As thebudget was pared down,campus ethnic com-munity centers became wary that they wouldbe affected,and the Provost did little toassuage their concerns.Tensions boiled over at a meeting in 1994,when Rice tried to address the communitycenters’ concerns,at one point drawing scoffsfrom the crowd (“Skeptical crowd grills topofficials at a forum on ethnic center cuts,”Jan.13,1994).“You don’t have the standing to questionmy commitment to minorities and minorityissues,Rice said at the forum.“I’ve beenblack all my life.”At another forum the following month,the Provost also drew snickers when she toldthe audience “you have to trust me.”Studentstold The Daily they felt like the Provost didnot respect them,and that they feared shehad a conservative agenda.The Daily calledher “impatient,even testy”and one seniorlabeled her “unprofessional,personallyinsulting and obnoxious”(“Out of the loop,students fear ‘conservative agenda,’”Feb.25,1994).Though the ethnic centers would ultimate-ly escape budget cuts,Rice’s decision to elim-inate the position of Cecilia Burciaga,associ-ate dean of Student Affairs and Casa Zapataresident fellow (RF),drew the ire of students.Rice claimed the dismissal of the 20-yearemployee was strictly for fiscal reasons,butthe firing outraged students.A group of students soon began a hungerstrike,with over 40 people fasting for 24hours in the Quad,and four continuing forthree days.The strike protested Burciaga’slayoff and called on the University to betteraddress a number of Chicano/a issues.Thestrikes ultimately ended after three days,andthe University agreed to sign a letter declar-ing its commitment to diversity (“Strike endsafter three days,agreement reached,May 9,1994).“Condi is one tough nut,said Jim Leckie,a civil engineering profes-sor who observed thenegotiations between fac-ulty and students.“Youwould have thought shewas negotiating with theRussians and not with stu-dents.She clearly receivedher management trainingin the Pentagon.”Female faculty,too,were displeased with Rice.Some expressed outragein 1993 with the decisionof the Provost’sCommittee on theRecruitment andRetention of WomenFaculty to remove a num-ber of personal anecdotesabout discrimination fromits report.Some femalefaculty suggested she wasworried about Stanford’simage;the committeecountered that quoteswere eliminated to protectprivacy.Rice’s commitmentto women faculty wouldagain be questioned fol-lowing the denial of tenureto Assistant History Prof.Karen Sawislak.Thoughher department approvedher for tenure,she wasrejected by the deans of the School of Humanitiesand Sciences.Studentswould form the StudentCoalition to Tenure KarenSawislak,though Ricewould eventually deny herappeal in 1998,sparkingfurther outcry.Women faculty wouldcite Sawislak’s case as oneexample of the Provost’sinsensitivity to their issues.A group of female profes-sors released a report in1998 declaring thatStanford had a poor recordof tenuring women facultyin recent years.Rice wouldcall the report “error-rid-den”and “a polemic,dis-missing their concerns(“Tenure criticized,Feb.25,1998).“I don’t believe myself that there is a cri-sis,Rice would say at a later meeting.“Ithink Stanford is a good place for women.”(“Caucus reports on female profs,May 11,1998.)“I very strongly feel that tenure is an eval-uation,she added.“You’ve had seven yearsto prove it.If we start to introduce affirma-tive action policies into our tenure practices,we’ve entered a slippery slope.”A group of faculty and staff would go onto submit a complaint to the U.S.Departmentof Labor in November 1998,alleging genderdiscrimination in University hiring and pro-motion practices including tenure.The inves-tigation did not end until December 2007,when the Department of Labor ruled in favorof the University.“No one in this complaint is asking for apreference,”Sawislak said.“We’re asking tobe evaluated based on our qualifications.”(“Labor Dept.may probe University,Feb.3,1999.)
The Final Provost Years
Rice’s final years as Provost would not befree of controversy.Many of the decisionscited as her major accomplishments wouldreceive mixed reactions.While the Provost’s push for graduatehousing is considered one of her achieve-mentsshe fought for short-term reconfig-uration to allow more students on campusand announced in 1998 that $15 millionwould go to building long-term housingstudents at the time were not fully satisfied.In May 1998,over 100 graduate studentscamped out in the quad to protest lack of adequate housing options.Her attituderubbed some students the wrong way.“I didn’t need students on the Quad to tellme that there was a housing problem,”Ricelater remarked (“Room for protest on cam-pus?Oct.6,1998).“People protesting in the Quad wouldnever get me or,I think I can speak forGerhard [Casper] too,to do something thatwe wouldn’t doto violate our personalprinciples or to do something that is not inthe interest of the University,”Rice added,speaking about the protests that hadoccurred in recent years.Rice’s formation of introductory seminarsand Sophomore College were undoubtedlypopular enhancements to undergraduateeducation.But her support of replacing theCultures,Ideas and Values program withIntroduction to the Humanities (IHUM) gar-nered mixed reactions.In 1995,a committee supported by theProvost began to reevaluate the CIV pro-gram,which received varied responses fromstudents,some of whom complained aboutthe excessive yet superficial reading.Someprofessors vehemently objected to the evalu-ation process,and History Prof.CarolynLougee Chappell complained it was shroud-ed in secrecy (“CIV professors object toshortening program,May 29,1996”).Although the CIV committee beganmeeting in October 1995,the first meetingheld with CIV faculty to discuss their con-cerns took place a full year later.“Instead of CIV faculty and student-pro-pelled changes,the push is coming from thetop down,Lougee Chappell said.“Thisadministration wants to do away with every-thing that was in place before they came tomakeover the University’s image.”(“Students award CIV high marks,Jan.27,1997.)History Prof.Emeritus Paul Seaver peti-tioned the committee’s review,saying it wasinadequate,but to no availIHUM wasfully implemented in 2000.“I was always glad that I had tenure,”Seaver said.“Otherwise I would have beenout on my ear for refusing to be a ‘team play-er’ in my unsuccessful defense of the fresh-man CIV program.”His battles with Rice over CIV scarred hisimpression of her.“She was the least collegial colleague I canremember of any academic I met at Stanfordin more than 40 years,”Seaver recently saidto The Daily.“Her style was authoritarian;she had no time for faculty governance.Hence committees were regarded as a wasteof time,told what to do rather than consult-ed,and constituted of those too intimidatedto stand up to her bullying;given her controlof the budget,faculty were relatively easy tointimidate.”
In December 1998,Rice announced thatshe would step down as Provost the followingsummer.Casper and others heaped praise onthe departing Provost,as did a number of other faculty.But others were less enthused.“I think most people were happy to seeher leave once Bush stole the first election in2000,Political Science Prof.Emeritus JohnManley told The Daily.“There was a big sighof relief in many quarters because she hadnot been a popular provost.”“Her role as provost was very authoritari-an,very rigid,very dogmatic and not well-appreciated by the people with whom shehad to interact,”he added.History Prof.Barton Bernstein agreed.“Almost everybody I know who dealt withher came away annoyed,if not angry,”hesaid.“One heard of various tales where shewould get a long report from somebody,oneof the deans,and send it back within hourswith a one-word to one-sentence negative.”“I liked Condi when she was withoutpower,”he added.“I found her pleasant,try-ing to grow,not very well educated,but eagerto know.As she gained power,I found herarrogant,not any smarter,not likely to do herhomework,but ferociously opinionated andwilling to impose her dictates.She’s a veryauthoritarian person,although she’s probablyvery good at sucking up to power.”At the time,Rice dismissed rumors thatshe would assist George Bush in his run forthe presidency and said she was hesitant toreturn to government.That would all change,of course,and Rice would go on to supportBush and become his National SecurityAdvisor.Long before the world woulddebate her performance in that role and asSecretary of State,Stanford was deeplyaffected by the popular professor and often-controversial Provost.Looking back,Blacker suggested that noone was surprised that Rice would go intopolitics.“I think both by temperament and inclina-tion,Secretary Rice is on the activist end othe spectrum in the academic world,”he said.“Plus,it’s hard to say no when the Presidentasks you to do something.”
Marisa Landicho,Paul Craft,Nikhil Kamat, Anna Dearybury,Joshua Alvarez and EricMessinger contributed to this report.Contact Andrea Fuller at anfuller@stanford.eduand Kamil Dada at kamild@stanford.edu.
Monday,February 23,2009
 The Stanford Daily
Continued from front page
Former Provost tackled budget cuts,diversity,IHUM
Slashing the University budget by $16.8million between 1994 and 1996
Eliminating the position of CeciliaBurciaga, associate dean of Student Affairs and Casa Zapata resident fellowin 1994
Denial of tenure to Assistant History Prof.Karen Sawislak in 1998
Making a commitment to expandinggraduate housing in 1998
Formation of Sophomore College in1995
Creation of introductory seminars in1997
Replacing Cultures, Ideas and Values(CIV) with Introduction to the Humanities(IHUM) in 2000
“She was the leastcollegial colleague I canremember ofanyacademic I met atStanford in more than 40years.”
— PAUL SEAVER,history professor emeritus
“She was extremelycaring and warm andkind and all sorts of qualities that I wouldn’thave necessarily expectedin an advisor or professor.”
Stanford Daily File Photo
Condoleezza Rice is known for her love of piano and is a trained concert pianist.The former Provost is also an avid football fan and once was an ice skater. She hasmaintained her passion for piano over the years, despite her busy schedule.
has known her for close to 30 yearsthrough teaching and writingtogether.He suggested that the for-mer Secretary of State would needsome time to decompress.“She is at a point in her careerwhere she can define her relation-ship with Stanford,Blacker said.“She’s been on a professional tread-mill that most people would findutterly exhausting for the last 15years.So it’s really up to her todefine the nature of her relationshipwith the University going forward.She’s just trying to catch her breathnow.I don’t think she’s thought veryhard about it.”Chair of the Political ScienceDepartment James Fearon said hehad not spoken to Rice personallyabout teaching,but added that Ricewould be able to return to teachingshould she wish to.He said that if she resumed her role as an activefaculty member in the department,she will have teaching obligations,asall faculty do.Blacker explained that it was dif-ficult for him to think of Rice oncampus for any period of time with-out going back to the classroom.“She considers Stanford herhome,he said.“I don’t think shewould ever leave Stanford in thatsense.I don’t think she would everresign her professorship.She lovesthis institution.”Blacker added,however,thatRice has always been a bit restless.“If there is a really interestingchallenge that comes her way,I haveno doubt that she would seize thatopportunity,as long as she can takeanother leave of absence fromStanford,he said.
Enthusiasm for Her Return
Though Rice has made enemiesin the political sphere,the professorhas many friends and supporters oncampus,particularly at Hoover.George Shultz,former Secretaryof State under President Reaganand distinguished fellow at Hoover,was pleased to hear of her return tocampus and is looking forward tointeracting with another high-levelpolicy-maker.“She’s a gifted personintellec-tually,musically and in terms of capacity of friendship and good con-versation,he said.Political Science Prof.StephenKrasner arrived at Stanford thesame year that Rice did (1981) andis glad to see her return.Heexplained that over the years,thetwo spent a lot of time together,sharing similar interests in every-thing from political theory to tennis.“She’s a good tennis player;shehits the ball hard,”Krasner joked.Krasner went on to work for theNational Security Council and thenreported directly to Rice as directorof policy planning at the StateDepartment.He believes Rice wassuccessful in her time as Secretary of State.“She was very proactive aboutlinking the U.S.with the Europeansin terms of negotiating with Iran,”he said.“She was very committed tothe Six Points talks with NorthKorea.”Thinking back to their timetogether in Washington,Krasnerpointed out that Rice was an excel-lent athlete and musician.He notedthat Rice played the piano regularlywith a small group of musicians inWashington and was very talented.“As Secretary of State,she decid-ed to take up golf,he said.“Sheactually got to be a decent golf play-er,which is not something you expectgiven the demands of the job.”He added that Rice had an activesocial calendar in Washington,mak-ing time for her friends despite hernear around-the-clock schedule.“She’s kept her friends throughall her stages of her life,”he said.“The people that she knew whenshe came to Stanford,when just aresearch scholar in 1981many of those people are people she’s stillfriendly with.”
Opposition to Rice
But Rice’s return will not be cel-ebrated by all.She made a numberof enemies during her tenure asprovost,and some of those woundshave yet to heal a decade later.Herrole in the controversial administra-tion of President George W.Bushhas only exacerbated feelings of illwill among some professors.Few of her objectors deny Rice’sright to return as a tenured profes-sor,but some are dismayed with herchoice to come back.Political Science Prof.EmeritusHubert Marshall said that,althoughhe personally liked Rice,he believesprofessors should not mix policy-making with teaching because itprecludes objectivity.Rice’s case,hesaid,was exacerbated by herinvolvement in the controversialIraq War and accusations that theBush administration endorsed tor-ture and the denial of habeas corpusin Guantanamo Bay.“People who’ve been workingat Washington at that level aregoing to be preoccupied with theirplace in history,Marshall said.“Almost all of them write booksand almost all of their books aredefensive.I’ve never known thehighest-level person to say,‘Well,Iwas wrong.’”“I know that nobody who teach-es in the social sciences is absolutelyobjective,but I do think that therank and file of those people whoteach in the social sciences reallymake an effort to be objective,”headded.“People who have reallybeen policy-makers just really can’tmeet that test.”Political Science Prof.EmeritusCharles Drekmeier similarlybelieved Rice’s image had beencompromised by her time inWashington,though he admitted shehas the right to be at Stanford.“Why she didn’t extricate herself [from the Bush administration] Ican’t understand,”Drekmeier said.“She compromised her integrity inways that will make it hard for herto be trusted...There is no ques-tion that she colluded in the denialof the use of instruments of torture.”Even though Rice has the rightto return,Political Science Prof.Emeritus John Manley said studentsand faculty should not keep theirobjections quiet.“The fact that she’s tenured andthat the administration would wel-come her back is no reason for peo-ple at Stanford who object to herreturn to stifle themselves,”he said.“People have a right to speak outwhether she’s tenured or not.”“I cannot think of Condi as myformer colleague without her handsstained by the blood of over 4,000American soldiers and untold num-bers of Iraqis,”Manley added.Blacker,however,emphasizedthat he hoped the Stanford commu-nity would give Rice time to read- just.He said that regardless of whatone thinks of the policies and theconduct of the Bush administration,the mental,emotional and physicaldemands that were placed on theformer Secretary of State wereextreme.“I hope people will suspend judg-ment about what Condi’s returnmeans until Secretary Rice has timeto figure out what her returnmeans,”he said.
The Daily is scheduled for an exclu- sive interview with Rice next week.Contact Kamil Dada at kamild@stan- ford.edu and Andrea Fuller at anfuller@stanford.edu.
Continued from front page
 The Stanford Daily
Monday,February 23,2009
ASSU pushes budget survey at meeting
The ASSU continued budget talkswith students at the third Town HallMeeting at 5pm in Old Union Friday.ASSU executives Jonny Dorsey andFagan Harris as well as Senate DeputyChair,Shelley Gao and Admin &Rules Chair,Luukas Ilves,urged stu-dents to fill out a survey that theybegan circulating Thursday eveningasking students for more detailedinput about their budget priorities.Preliminary results from the sur-vey indicate that students listedUndergraduate Advising andResearch (UAR) research grants andfellowships,Vaden Health Center,Counseling and PsychologicalServices (CAPS) and The Bridgeamong the top priorities that shouldbe most insulated from budget cuts.Athletic programs and club sports arealso among the high-ranking studentpriorities along with introductoryseminars and Haas Center program-ming.Some areas that could be com-promised according to the surveyinclude,Varsity Athletics,IHUM,stu-dent government,and new studentorientation (NSO).In response to the latest surveyresults,Jordan McCarthy ‘11 suggest-ed that NSO organizers should becareful about what they cut.“Preserve the kernel without keep-ing all of the flashy stuff,”he said.Many students agreed that trim-ming the overstuffed freshman orien-tation could save the university quite abit of money.Opening the floor to student dia-logue,Harris emphasized the impor-tance of not just re-allocating dollars,but integrating programs,looking atthe problems holistically and figuringout how the University can run moreefficiently.University spending sparkeddebate as attendees raised issuesabout student employment andsalaries.Angelina Cardona ‘11,ASSUchair of mental health initiatives,noted that cutting resident assistant(RA) salaries in half could save the
Please see
,page 4
Stanford Daily File Photo
Condoleezza Rice and Residence Dean Thom Massey stand in the Quad in theearly morning hours of May 29, 1998. Rice spoke with protestors who calledfor graduate housing reform, decrying the lack of affordable options. Ricewould champion the increase in graduate housing funds to the Faculty Senate.
McFaul selected as NationalSecurity Affairs special assistant
Political Science Professor Michael McFaul has beenselected by President Obama to serve as special assis-tant to the President for National Security Affairs andsenior director for Russian and Eurasian affairs at theNational Security Council.McFaul is currently the deputy director of Stanford’sFreeman Spogli Institute for International Studies anddirector of the Center on Democracy,Development andthe Rule of Law.He was also a senior adviser toObama’s campaign on Russia and Eurasia issues,and hecontinued to advise on foreign policy issues during thetransition period.“President-elect Obama was fortunate to have thebenefit of Mike’s counsel on a range of vital issues dur-ing the campaign—including dealing with a resurgentRussia,”said Freeman Spogli Institute Director Coit D.Blacker in a statement.“Now,from the White House,thePresident can call on Mike’s expertise and experience inthe region to build more constructive relationships withRussia,Eurasia and our allies across a broad strategicfront.”McFaul graduated from Stanford with a bachelor’sdegree in international relations in 1986 and a master’sin Russian and East European studies also in 1986.Hewent on to receive a doctorate in international relationsfrom Oxford in 1991.
Daily Poll Question
 What do you think of Condoleezza Rice’s returnto campus?
I think it’s great; we’re lucky to have her 
She’s a valuable asset, but I don’t agree with her politics
She’s a war criminal and has no place here
I don’t care
vote today at stanforddaily.com! 
“Why she didn’t extricate herself[from theBush administration],I can’t understand.She compromised her integrity in ways thatwill make it hard for her to be trusted.”
— CHARLES DREKMEIER,political science professor emeritus
“Professor Rice’s return to Stanford willprovide our students and the academiccommunity with a great opportunity tolearn from her experience in public serviceand international affairs.
— JOHN HENNESSY,University President

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->