• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Home A. Rivera Cathol-X-ism Hell His Name Rabbit Holes Sources 
Unlocked Wisdom
The house that Sin built
This society is built on corruption. Without biblical truth, what we would have for our moral understanding would benothing short of primate. Many people argue that the ten commandments, or parts there of, have existed before the writings of Moses. But, in actual fact the most important difference between Yahweh’s law and that of men is that His haveto do with what constitutes goodness while ours does not. No other law in the history of creation holds such a claim foreternal authority. This is why Yahweh’s law is true, and why it is the only perfect one.The western world is built on top of Greek, Roman, Egyptian, Babylonian and Persian customs (in a nut shell). Themajority of our philosophies have come from ancient Greece and Rome. Things like the eternal soul, hell, evolution andsalvation through works have all come from these times.I will do an expose on many of the important men who have made up our core modern socio-philosophical belief system. I will show you that the world is corrupted because of the men who have fancifully made theories that reject God’ssovereignty. I will also prove that these great men were nothing more than men of open sin. 
Plato
Greece (est. 427 BC– 348 BC)Plato was a pedophilic homosexual advocate, whose flawed sciences became themodern basis for many occult pagan philosophies. His many ideas about what was, and what is, are the foundations for many peoples views on how they see life itself. His blind belief in his own pride created many errors that caused many to err in regards to truefaith. The academic establishment pushes plutonian logic on naive students to the pointof regurgitation. His philosophical outlook is the root of the New age movement. Alsomodern advances in witchcraft / luciferi*nism are shaped by his works. This manabhorred the idea of family, and his works created the basis for communism and theinsipid aristocracy. 
Proof of his Homosexuality 
Contrary to our Almighty God’s desires, plato advocates homosexuality as a thing that’s preserved for the educated orsuperior, lets say those who are in the know. Calling all non homosexual accepting people barbarians (even though othergreeks did not advocate it), he then goes on to say that these groups are somehow lacking in powerful friendship orpassionate love (within the confines of same gender friendship) which is simply wrong to presume. His ideas try to ratify that which is abnormal by making those who partake in such practices seem better educated. This same outlook is heldtoday, this is the same tactic that the world is using to make sin openly acceptable to all. Plato says:“Homosexuality is regarded as shameful by 
 barbarians
and by those who live under despotic governments just as philosophy is regarded as shameful by them, because it is apparently not in the interest of such rulersto have great ideas engendered in their subjects, or powerful friendships or passionate love-all of whichhomosexuality is particularly apt to produce.”He also said “Love is a serious mental disease.” In opposition, Christ teaches that "God is love" (1 john 4:16).Plato, in the Symposium, argues for an army to be comprised of same-sex lovers. We see how his mind works, when hethinks he is correct he goes all the way with it. Us modern people see that Plato lived in open sin.
Flawed take on eternal life
In this conversation we see that plato disregards the actual understanding about the human soul. We see how he uses
God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; And the weak things to shame the strong.{1Cor 1:27}
 
 
reason based on a flawed assumption to create his own basis, finishing by making this flawed reasoning his version of ‘correct’ reality:“Cebes offers a more difficult objection: what if the body is like a garment worn by the soul? Even though I continue toexist longer than any single article of my clothing does, there will come a time when I die, and some of my clothes willprobably continue to exist. In the same way, even if the argument from opposites has shown that the soul can in principleoutlast the life of any particular human body, there might come a time when the soul itself ceases to exist." Even if there islife after death, Cebes suggests, that the soul may not be truly immortal. Biblically this is the correct argument.In response to this criticism, Plato significantly revises the argument from opposities by incorporating an additionalconcept of the role of the Forms. "Each Form, he now maintains, is the cause of all of every particular instance that bearsits name: the form of Beauty causes the beauty of any beautiful thing; the form of Equality causes the equality of any pairof equal things; etc. But then, since the soul is living, it must participate in the Form of Life, and thus it cannot ever die.(
 Phaedo
105d) The soul is perfectly and certainly imperishable, not only for this life, but forever.”(http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/2f.htm)This idea of an eternal soul became the foundation for the
eternal hell
. Plato’s idea of forms also dictates that what’sabove is also beneath. A lot of his ideas were fashioned into real world social systems. This man has single handedly helpedlead a revolution against Gods truth via his educational abominable ignorance. Modern people rather choose his ignorant blind stance to that of Gods spoken Word. Believing in such lies was/is just the first step to national or worldly corruption.
 Against Traditional Family 
This next excerpt shows that plato desired to destroy the small family and make us into one large family based on ahierarchical system. God made a father and mother and children, while Plato made the society to fulfill these roles andfunctions:“The best city is described as if its unity makes it a large family. The city is the family writ large. Is the family the soul writlarge? It is surely the case that in the Republic the constituent parts of the city are individual artisans or classes of artisans,not families. The city can be the soul writ large because the souls of the just city have been liberated from the confines of the family. Finding the soul in the expanse of the city require that the soul break the narrow bounds of thefamily.” (Education and the Family in Plato’s Republic Christopher A. Colmo:http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/8/6/6/0/pages86601/p86601-1.php)So we see that Plato was living quite sinfully. His assumptions have been proven unacceptable, and his philosophy is thatof evil, (this fruit deems the tree grotesque). He is one reason why our modern day society is corrupted. 
Darwin
Many people know Darwin for his fanciful tales of bacteria becoming humanity. Butmany don’t know about his history with religion. It is plain to see that many of thesemen who end up going against Yahwey have themselves given up on maintaining asteadfast mind, or fail to develop a real living faith before their fall. These men are thefailures that Christ speaks about when he says “walk not as other Gentiles [who] walk,in the vanity of their mind, Having their understanding darkened, being alienated fromthe life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of theirheart: Who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness.” ( Eph 4:17-19). After these men reject God they aretaken by sat*n, and from thence they do his bidding unknowingly. Darwin lived in painall of his life, this is due to his sinful deeds. 
 About his conversion
From his bio:During these two years (i.e. October 1836 to January 1839) I was led to think much about religion. Whilst on board the
 Beagle
I was quite orthodox, and
I remember being heartily laughed at by several of the officers (thoughthemselves orthodox) for quoting the Bible as an unanswerable authority on some point of morality 
. Isuppose it was the novelty of the argument that amused them. But I had gradually come, by this time, to see that the OldTestament from its manifestly false history of the world, with the Tower of Babel, the rainbow as a sign, etc., etc., and fromits attributing to God the feelings of a revengeful tyrant, was no more to be trusted than the sacred books of the Hindoos,or the beliefs of any 
 barbarian
. (Proof of the tower of babel) The question then continually rose before my mind and would not be banished,—is it credible that if God were now to make a revelation to the Hindoos, would he permit it to beconnected with the belief in Vishnu, Siva, &c., as Christianity is connected with the Old Testament. This appeared to meutterly incredible. (http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/philosophy/Charles_Darwin_quotes.html) (more on tower of babel)
So we see that he doubted Gods word, from here he falls into the world of imagination lead by hiscarnal conscience fed by evil nature.
"
 
 
 y ur er re ec ng a e c eares ev ence wou e requ s e o ma e any sane man e eve n e m rac es y w cChristianity is supported,—that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible do miracles become,—that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us,—that the Gospelscannot be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events,—that they differ in many important details, far tooimportant as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eye-witnesses;—by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve inChristianity as a divine revelation. The fact that many false religions have spread over large portions of the earth like wild-fire had some weight with me. Beautiful as is the morality of the New Testament, it can hardly be denied that its perfectiondepends in part on the interpretation which we now put on metaphors and allegories.""But I was very unwilling to give up my belief;—I feel sure of this for I can well remember often and often
inventing day-dreams
of old letters between distinguished Romans
and manuscripts being discovered at Pompeii orelsewhere which confirmed in the most striking manner all that was written in the Gospels
. (The proof heneeded) But I found it more and more difficult, with free scope given to my imagination, to invent evidence which wouldsuffice to convince me. Thus disbelief crept over me at a very slow rate, but was at last complete. The rate was so slow thatI felt no distress, and have never since doubted even for a single second that my conclusion was correct. I can indeedhardly see how anyone ought to wish Christianity to be true; for if so the plain language of the text seems to show that themen who do not believe, and this would include my Father, Brother and almost all my best friends, will be everlastingly punished. (Darwin’s autobiography) We see that his imagination is the same thing which allowed him to follow through with such an impossible theory.Darwin’s theory is less realistic than a pop can building itself out of raw natural aluminum, and then coke falling from thesky to fill it up perfectly. Evolution relies on a faith in science, while darwin
didn’t even have faith in his own mind
.Notice that the lack of evidence is what detoured him from Christianity. Basically if he would have been alive when thedead sea scrolls were found he would have believed in the scripture. What a shame.
Darwin never pretended that his theory was ‘correct’
 He said “I cannot pretend to throw the least light on such abstruse problems. The mystery of the beginning of all things isinsoluble by us; and I for one must be content to remain an Agnostic.” (Meaning he still believed that God could have doneit all) Which He did
Freud
 Sigmund Freud was a Jewish man who at a young age recanted God and then was blessed with flawed knowledge. The biggest problem is that his perspectives came fromoccultism and the like. His understandings dropped human morality down another pegand post. He said that sexuality and morality are nothing more than psychologicalpredeterminations that help shape a mind while it grows into an adult. His perspectivesdid sound good, but they have only helped people become more neurotic and proud. Histeachings are another that are crammed down the throats of the naive.. 
On sexuality 
Psychoanalysis had a disastrous effect on the 20th century. Men undergoing therapy were told that they wereunconsciously homosexual, husbands were advised to divorce and wives were told to find lovers. But how reliable arethese so-called unconscious activities?In the early 1960’s academics under Freud’s influence sought to change sexual morality in order to prevent, as they thought, a breakdown in civilization. They encouraged therapeutic adultery and sex education with no deviationsexcluded. Freud’s theory of the death instinct was popularized in films and plays because it was thought that the enactmentof cruelty and aggression would lead to a catharsis and to a less violent society.His works advocate homosexuality, violence and the degradation of society as a whole.
Drug usage
It is well known that freud both used cocaine and advised its use on patients. “From 1884 to 1887 Freud wrote four papersconcerning cocaine, including a definitive review ("Über Coca") in 1884. He obviously felt comfortable in both takingcocaine and writing about it in his letters. He mentions and discusses his use of and dreams about cocaine in theInterpretation of Dreams (1889). The true extent and duration of his self-experiments is not known, since access to hiscorrespondence has been severely restricted.”(http://www.bookrags.com/research/freud-and-cocaine-edaa-02/)
Occultism
’
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...