• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
I
N o . 9 9 -8 3 9 0 1
I N THE SUPREM E COURT
OF THE STATE OF KANSAS
\ In the M attero fthe M arriage o f
H a lle c k R ic h a rd s o n ,
P e titio n e r-A p p ellee
a n d
C la u d in e D o m b ro w s k i,
R espondent-A ppellant
A P P E L L A N T 'S P E T I T I O NF O R R E V IE W
A p p eal fro m th e D istrict C o u rto fShaw nee C ounty, K ansas \ue000
C ase N o. 96D 217 \ue000
H onorable Jam esP .B uchele, H onorable R ichard A nderson, Judges \ue000
R ebeccaA . K in g # 1 6 7 7 2 \ue000
R ilin g , B u r k h e a d&
N itc h e r, C h td . \ue000
808 M assachusettsS 1 .
. \ue000
Law rence, K S
66044 \ue000
(7 8 5 ) 8 4 1 -4 7 0 0
A tto rn e y fo r A p p e lla n t
T a b leo f C o n te n ts \ue000

P ra y e r fo r R e v ie w. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 \ue000 S ta te m e n to fth eIs s u e. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 \ue000 S ta te m e n to fF a c ts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 \ue000 A rg u m e n ts a n d A u th o ritie s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 \ue000

I \ue000
-I
Is s u e .
T h e b e s t in te re s tso f th e m in o r c h ild , a n d th e c o n s titu tio n a l rig h tso f b o th th e c h ild \ue000
a n d h e r m o th e r, d e m a n d th a t a s ta y o r o th e r re lie f fro m
th e o rd e rso fth e d is tric t c o u rt \ue000
th a t a re th e s u b je c to fth is a p p e a l b e is s u e d . \ue000
G re e n e v . G re e n e ,2 0 1
K a n .7 0 1 ,4 4 3 P .2 d 1 3 5 6 (1 9 8 0 ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 . 4 \ue000
In R e M a rria g eo fB u rg e s s ,5 1

C a l.R p tr.2 d4 4 4 ,9 1 3 P .2 d 4 7 3 1 9 9 6 ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 \ue000 D 'O n o frio v . D 'O n o friO , 3 6 5 A ,2 d 2 7 (N .J . S u p .C tC h .D iv . 1 9 7 6 ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 \ue000 C a rls o n v . C a rls o n , 8 K a n .A p p .2 d 5 6 4 ,6 6 1P .2 d 8 3 3 (1 9 8 3 ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 \ue000 L a G ro n e b y B rid g e r v . L a G ro n e , 2 3 8 K a n . 6 3 0 , 7 1 3 P .2 d 4 7 4 (1 9 8 6 ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 \ue000

C o n c lu s io n. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "
5 \ue000
I
N o . 9 9 -8 3 9 0 1 \ue000
I N THE SUPREM E COURT \ue000
OF THE STATE OF KANSAS \ue000
In the M attero fth e M arriage of \ue000
H a lle c k R ic h a rd s o n , \ue000
P e titio n e r- A p p e lle e \ue000
and \ue000
C la u d in e D o m b ro w s k i, \ue000
R e s p o n d e n t-A p p e lla n t \ue000
A P P E L L A N T 'S P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W
\ue000
Prayer for Review \ue000
C om es N ow
th e
A p p e lla n t h e re in , .C la u d in e
D om brow ski,
b y
a n d
th ro u g h
h e r
counsel, RebeccaA .K in g , A tto rn e y
at Law , and
re s p e c tfu lly
re q u e s ts th a t th is C o u r t
re v ie w

a n d re v e rs e th e d e c is io no f th e C o u r to f A p p e a ls d e n y in g th e p e titio n fo r w rito f habeas corpus and m otion for stayo f proceedings pending this appeal that w eref i l e d by A p p e lla n t in th is c a s e .

D ateo fD e c is io n
O ctober 7, 1999.
S ta te m e n to f th e Is s u e
I s s u e .
T h e b e s t in te re s tso f th e m in o r c h ild , a n d th e c o n s titu tio n a l rig h ts o f b o th th e
c h ild
a n d
h e r m o th e r, d e m a n d
th a t a stay
o r o th er relief from
th e
o rd e rs
o f th e
d i s t r i c t
c o u r t
th a t
a re
th e
s u b je c t
o f
th is
a p p e a l
b e
is s u e d .
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...