P. 1
13-07-26 Microsoft-Motorola Disputed Jury Instructions

13-07-26 Microsoft-Motorola Disputed Jury Instructions

Ratings: (0)|Views: 69 |Likes:
Published by Florian Mueller
July 26, 2013 joint filing by Microsoft and Motorola of disputed jury instructions for their August 2013 breach-of-FRAND-contract trial in the Western District of Washington
July 26, 2013 joint filing by Microsoft and Motorola of disputed jury instructions for their August 2013 breach-of-FRAND-contract trial in the Western District of Washington

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: Florian Mueller on Jul 29, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/23/2014

pdf

text

original

 
HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBARTIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTONAT SEATTLEMICROSOFT CORPORATION,Plaintiff,v.MOTOROLA INC., et al.,Defendants.Case No. C10-1823-JLR JOINT STATEMENT OF DISPUTEDJURY INSTRUCTIONS PURSUANTTO LR 51
TRIAL DATE: AUGUST 26, 2013
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC, et al.,Plaintiffs,v.MICROSOFT CORPORATION,Defendant.Pursuant to the Court’s July 1, 2013 Order, (Dkt. 714), and Local Rule 51(h), the partieshereby submit their Joint Statement of Disputed Jury Instructions, a copy of which is also beingtransmitted to the Court by electronic mail as a Word document.JOINT STATEMENT OF DISPUTED JURYINSTRUCTIONS
- 1
 
LAW OFFICES
CALFO HARRIGAN LEYH & EAKES, LLP
999 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4400SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104TEL, (206) 623-1700 FAX, (206) 623-8717
 
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526
Case 2:10-cv-01823-JLR Document 791 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 140
 
 JOINT STATEMENT OF DISPUTED JURYINSTRUCTIONS
- 2
 
LAW OFFICES
CALFO HARRIGAN LEYH & EAKES, LLP
999 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4400SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104TEL, (206) 623-1700 FAX, (206) 623-8717
 
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Table of Contents for the Joint Proposed Jury Instructions, filed concurrentlyherewith, includes a full list of all proposed instructions and, for each instruction, indicateswhether it is an agreed instruction, a disputed instruction where the parties have proposed alternative formulations, or a disputed instruction where the opposing party has not proposed analternative formulation. The Table of Contents immediately below lists only the disputed instructions.
 Instruction Number and Title
 
Sources
 
 Page No.
 
 Party(ies)
 
 
Preliminary Instruction No. 2Summary of claims anddefenses, background, andprior determinations of theCourt
Dkt. 673,
Finding of Facts and Conclusionsof Law
, April 19, 2013; Dkt. 188,
Order onPlaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 
, Feb. 27, 2012; Dkt. 335,
Order 
,June 6, 2012; Dkt. 465,
Order 
, Oct. 12,201211Microsoft’salternative
Preliminary Instruction No. 2Summary of Claims andDefenses
 Ninth Circuit Manual of Model JuryInstructions, Civil § 1.2 (2007) (“NinthCircuit Model”); Dkt. 673,
Finding of Factsand Conclusions of Law
, April 19, 2013
 
33Motorola’salternative
Preliminary Instruction No. 3Burden of Proof –Preponderance of theEvidence
 Ninth Circuit Model 1.3
 
37Microsoft’salternative
Preliminary Instruction No. 3Burden of Proof –Preponderance of theEvidence
6 Wash. Prac., Wash. Pattern Jury Instr.Civ. (“WPI”) 21.01 (6th ed.); Ninth CircuitModel 1.3
 
38Motorola’salternative
Preliminary Instruction No. 4Two or More Parties –Different Legal Rights
 Ninth Circuit Model 1.5
 
39Motorola
Preliminary Instruction No.20Charts and Summaries NotReceived in Evidence
 Ninth Circuit Model 2.12
 
41Motorola
Preliminary Instruction No.21Charts and SummariesReceived in Evidence
 Ninth Circuit Model 2.13
 
42Motorola
Case 2:10-cv-01823-JLR Document 791 Filed 07/26/13 Page 2 of 140
 
 JOINT STATEMENT OF DISPUTED JURYINSTRUCTIONS
- 3
 
LAW OFFICES
CALFO HARRIGAN LEYH & EAKES, LLP
999 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4400SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104TEL, (206) 623-1700 FAX, (206) 623-8717
 
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526
 Instruction Number and Title
 
Sources
 
 Page No.
 
 Party(ies)
 
 
Final Instruction No. 2Burden of Proof –Preponderance of theEvidence
 Ninth Circuit Model 1.343Microsoft’salternative
Final Instruction No. 2Burden of Proof –Preponderance of theEvidence
WPI 21.01; Ninth Circuit Model 1.344Motorola’salternative
Final Instruction No. 5Prior rulings by the Court
Dkt. 607,
Order Granting Microsoft’s Motion Dismissing Motorola’s Claim for  Injunctive Relief 
, Nov. 30, 2012; Dkt. 703,
 Hearing Transcript 
, June 5, 2013; Dkt. 703,
 Hearing Transcript 
, June 5, 2013; Cramer Decl. Ex. C, Motorola’s Pretrial Statement45Microsoft
Final Instruction No. 13Charts and Summaries NotReceived in Evidence
 Ninth Circuit Model 2.1247Motorola
Final Instruction No. 14Charts and SummariesReceived into Evidence
 Ninth Circuit Model 2.1348Motorola
Final Instruction No. 16Promised Defined
WPI 301.0249Microsoft
Final Instruction No. 17Issues – Breach of Contract
WPI 300.01; Dkt. 188,
Order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 
,February 27, 2012; Dkt. 335,
Order 
, June 6,2012; Dkt. 673,
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
, April 19, 201350Microsoft’salternative
Final Instruction No. 17Issues – Breach of Contract
WPI 300.01; Cramer Decl. Ex. E -Microsoft’s Response to Motorola’sInterrogatory No. 353Motorola’salternative
Case 2:10-cv-01823-JLR Document 791 Filed 07/26/13 Page 3 of 140

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->