COPPA 2.0: The New Battle over Privacy, Age Verification, Online Safety & Free Speech

 
 
 
 
 
Value This
Doc
Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 36 43
Words: 18027 13640
Characters: 120585 81678
Lines: 352 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.69 5.99
Words per line: 51.21 21.89
Words per page: 500.75 317.21

Add to your reading list

Flag_red Flag this document

Document Information

560 Reads | 0 Comments

Description

Online privacy, child safety, free speech and anonymity are on a collision course. The 1998 Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) already mandates certain online privacy protections for children under 13, but many advocate expanding online privacy protections for both adolescents and adults. Furthermore, efforts continue at both the federal and state levels to institute new regulations, such as age verification mandates, aimed at ensuring the safety of children online. There is an inherent tension between these objectives: Attempts to achieve perfectly “safe” online environments will likely require the surrender of some privacy and speech rights, including the right to speak anonymously.
These tensions are coming to a head with state-based efforts to expand COPPA, which requires “verifiable parental consent” before certain sites or services may collect, or enable the sharing of, personal information from children under the age of 13. Several proposed state laws would extend COPPA’s parental-consent framework to cover all adolescents under 18. This seemingly small change would require age verification of not only adolescents and their parents, but—for the first time—large numbers of adults, thus raising grave First Amendment concerns. Such broad age verification mandates would, ironically, reduce online privacy by requiring more information to be collected from both adolescents and adults for age verification purposes, while doing little to make adolescents safer. In practical terms, the increased scale of “COPPA 2.0” efforts would present significant implementation and enforcement challenges. Finally, state-level COPPA 2.0 proposals would likely conflict with the Constitution’s Commerce Clause.
Despite these profound problems, COPPA expansion has great rhetorical appeal and seems likely to be at the heart of future child safety debates—especially efforts to require mandatory age verification. There are, however, many better ways to protect children online than by expanding COPPA beyond its original, limited purpose.

Pdf_16x16 36 Pages


Date Added

05/21/2009

Category
Tags

children, Google, youth, schools, parents, media, Internet, adult, bullying, identity, parental, States, web, teens, online, Facebook, myspace, bebo, Services, privacy, Flickr, content, consolidation, constitution, websites, OVERSEAS, harassment, gonzales, LiveJournal, diversity, Frederick, aol, Predator, Copa, authentication, ACLU, illinois, identification, Identify, Federalism, privo, gays, offshore, Minorities, adolescent, Credentials, minor, ag, reno, FTC, friendster, morse, Yahoo!, cdt, credentialing, Coppa, Tinker, child safety, new jersey, Social Networking Sites, Progress and Freedom Foundation, Berin Szoka, law enforcement, Free Speech, authenticate, Supreme Court, Long Tail, first amendment, new yorker, Adam Thierer, personal information, Federal Trade Commission, credit cards, Apostle Paul, cyberbullying, myyearbook.com, lord of the flies, age verification, change.gov, user education, user empowerment, macarthur foundation, coppa 2.0, attorneys general, children’s online privacy act, children’s online privacy protection act, parry aftab, anne collier, john cardillo, denise tayloe, center for democracy and technology, aclu v. reno, american library association, adam marcus, alex harris, google insights, ashutosh avinash bhagwat, strict scrutiny, solveig singleton, eugene volokh, deirdre mulligan, paul of tarsus, gay suicide, commerce clause, interstate commerce, picollecting sites, actual knowledge, adultoriented, general audience, personally identifying, junior internet, dormant commerce clause, internet safety technical task force

Groups
Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

or use Facebook Connect