• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
Rockefeller Philanthropy: And the Rise of Social Anthropology
Donald Fisher
Anthropology Today, Vol. 2, No. 1. (Feb., 1986), pp. 5-8.
Stable URL:
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0268-540X%28198602%292%3A1%3C5%3ARPATRO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-I
Anthropology Todayis currently published by Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained
prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in
the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/journals/rai.html.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.

The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic
journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers,
and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take
advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

http://www.jstor.org
Fri Jan 4 09:55:44 2008
Rockefeller Philanthropy \ue000
a n d th e R is e o f S o c ia l A n th r o p o lo g y
D O N A L D F IS H E R
D o n a ld F is h e r s tu d ie d
s o c io lo g y a t th e U n iv e r s ity
o f B ir m in g h a m a n d h a s a
d o c to r a te in s o c io lo g y o f
e d u c a tio n fr o m
th e
U n iv e r s ity o f C a lifo r n ia ,
Berkeley. H e is an
Associate Professor

te a c h in g S o c io lo g y in th e D e p a r tm e n t o f S o c ia l a n d E d u c a tio n a l S tu d ie s ,

U niversity of B ritish
Columbia, Vancouver.
W h ile th e re is d is a g re e m e n t a b o u t th e p re c ise d a te
w hen
S o c ia l
A n th ro p o lo g y
becam e
th e

d o m in a n t a n th ro p o lo g ic a l p e rsp e c tiv e in B rita in , a ll a g re e th a t it h a p p e n e d d u rin g th e in te rw a r p e rio d . K u p e r' se ttle s o n 1924 w hen

M a lin o w s k i to o k
u p

th e a p p o in tm e n t a s R e a d e r in S o c ia l A n th ro p o lo g y a t th e L o n d o n S c h o o l o f E c o n o m ic s (L S E ). B eatti? locates th e trium ph around 1 9 3 0 , w h ile B o is s e v a id p re fe rs t h e m id -1 9 3 0 s . K u k lic lt' flu c tu a te s

b e tw e e n
th e
la te
1 9 2 0 s
b y
w h ic h
tim e
M a lin o w s k i h a d d e fe a te d th e D iffu s io n is t d o g m a , a n d
1 9 3 7
w hen
R ad cliffe-B ro w n
to o k
u p
th e
C h a ir
i n
A n th ro p o lo g y a t O x fo rd . A ll a g re e th a t th e tw o le a d e rs
of the School were Bronislaw

M a lin o w s k i a n d A .R . R a d c liffe -B ro w n . F u rth e r, th e p ro g re ss o f th e se tw o m e n a n d

th e ir
s tu d e n ts in
B ritain, A frica, and
A u stralia
p ro v id e s
c o n v in c in g
e v id e n c e
fo r
M arvin
H arris's
c o n c l u s i o n t h a t 'B y
th e la te 1 9 3 0 s th is g ro u p
[ s o c ia l
a n th ro p o lo g is ts 1
h a d
g a in e d
v irtu a lly
u n c h a lle n g e d
c o n tro l o f th e a n th ro p o lo g ic a l e s ta b lis h m e n t th ro u g h o u t
th e
B ritish
E m pire?
S o c ia l a n th ro p o lo g is ts w e re
i n
c o n tro l
o f
th e
d is c ip lin e .
T h e ir
u se
o f

s y n c h ro n ic fu n c tio n a lis t a n d s tru c tu ra l fu n c tio n a lis t fra m e w o rk s tie d to le n g th y p e rio d s o f in te n s e p a rtic ip a n t o b s e rv a tio n in th e fie ld h a d b e c o m e th e d o m a in a s s u m p tio n s o f th e discipline. B ritish

Social A nthropology
h a d
becom e
'n o r m a l s c ie n c e '.

Yet we d o not have an adequate understanding of w hat can only be described as a drastic and im portant shift. H isto rian s,

s o c io lo g is ts ,
a n d
a n th ro p o lo g is ts
h a v e
fo c u sse d p rim a rily u p o n th e c o n te n t o f th e id e a s, a n d
the extent to w hich the new

perspective w as regarded a s in te lle c tu a llys u p e rio d M o re o fte n th a n n o t, th e fo c u s o f e x p la n a tio n

has been
o n th e lin k a g e a t b o th
th e
in te lle c tu a l a n d id e o lo g ic a l le v e ls o f fu n c tio n a lis m
a n d
c o lo n ia lis m .
A n a ly s ts
h a v e
p o in te d
t o
th e
c o r r e s p o n d e n c e
b e tw e e n
th e
aim s
o f
c o lo n ia l
ad m in istrato rs
i n
th e
B ritish
E m pire,
a n d
th e
a s s u m p tio n s u n d e rly in g F u n c tio n a l th e o ry ; th e in te rn a l
lo g ic
o f
th e
d is c ip lin e
that was pressing
for a
n e w
c o n c e p tu a liz a tio n a n d n e w m e th o d o lo g ic a l a p p ro a c h e s ;
th e
agreem ent
am ong
a n th ro p o lo g is ts
a n d
a d m in is tra to rs a b o u t th e
n e e d
t o
b rin g
science and

p ra c tic e to g e th e r; th e in tra d is c ip lin e c o n flic ts b e tw e e n aspiring leaders in the discipline; an d not least, thes o c io - h is to ric a l

s e ttin g
w h ic h
in c lu d e d
all the
s o c ia l

a n d e c o n o m ic u n c e rta in tie s a s w ell a s th e c h a n g in g p o litic a l a n d e c o n o m ic re la tio n s b e tw e e n th e c o lo n is ts a n d th e c o lo n iz e d .'

I suggest th at th e w ealth of in fo rm atio n still fails to
e x p la in
th e
u n d e rly in g
causes for the rise
o f

S o c ia l A n th ro p o lo g y . T h e in te n t h e re is to h e lp fill in th e s e g a p s . T he

f o c u s is
u p o n
th e
re la tio n
b e tw e e n
R o c k e fe lle r
p h ila n th ro p y
a n d
S o c ia l
A n th ro p o lo g y
d u rin g

th e in te rw a r p e rio d . R o c k e fe lle r fu n d in g c e rta in ly d id m o re than any other funding source to facilitate the new Social A n th ro p o lo g y . T h e d e c is io n s t o p ro v id e th is s u p p o r t

em erged
fro m
th e
c o m p le x
n e g o tia tio n s
b e tw e e n
F o u n d a tio n o ffic ia ls a n d th e S o c ia l A n th ro p o lo g is ts .
R o c k e fe lle r p h ila n th r o p y
R o c k e fe lle r
p h ila n th ro p y ,
th e
L a u r a
S p e lm a n
R o c k e fe lle r
M em orial
(L S R M )
a n d
th e

R o c k e fe lle r Foundation (R F), had clearly defined policy objectives? A s representatives of the ruling class, the trustees and officers of these foundations subscribed to a n ideology of 'sophisticated conservatism ' w hose w atchw ords w ere 'e ffic ie n c y ',

'c o n tro l:
a n d
'p la n n in g '.
I n
th e
s o c ia l

sciences, the central thrust of these policies during the interw ar period w as th at these subjects ought to becom e m ore 'scientific'

in the natural science m ode. For the foundations, this m eant that the social sciences ought t o

be m ore em pirical, realistic,
a n d

p ra c tic a l. T h e s e policies translated into program m es th at w ere designed to establish the 'proper'

attitude in the practices and structures of both individuals and the academ y. T he aim was im proved social control.

T h e w o rld w a s d iv id e d in to a re a s o f in flu e n c e . T h e m ost im portant area outside the U nited States w as G reat Britain and her Em pire. It follow ed that universities, research institutes,and individuals received grants and fellow ships as part of an overall fram ew ork that was d e s ig n e d

t o
a c h ie v e
th e
p o lic y
o b je c tiv e s .
W hile
A n th ro p o lo g y
rem ained
a
s e c o n d a ry
interest of
th e
R ockefeller foundations, there w as a period from
th e
m id-1920s to th e early 1930s w hen the subject assum ed
the character of a focal point. This short period
o f
R o c k e fe lle r
in te re s t
w as
a b s o lu te ly
c ritic a l
t o
th e
d e v e lo p m e n t
o f
A n th ro p o lo g y
i n
g e n e ra l,
a n d ,

sp e c ific a lly , to th e e m e rg e n c e o f S o c ia l A n th ro p o lo g y . The latter approach w as seen to be the m ost scientific precisely because it offered the know ledge that w ould m a k e th e p ra c tic e o f c o lo n ia l a d m in is tra tio n b o th m o re e ffic ie n t a n d m o re h u m a n e . S o c ia l c o n tro l w o u ld b e in c re a s e d . T h e p ro b le m s a s s o c ia te d w ith 'c u ltu re c o n ta c t', w hich w ere very m uch part of th e A m erican scene, could be resolved.

F u n d in g o f S o c ia l A n t h r o p o lo g y
R o c k e fe lle r
p h ila n th ro p y
o p e ra te d
a

c o o rd in a te d schem e involving operating expenses, research grants, fe llo w s h ip s , a n d

p u b lic a tio n
a s s is ta n c e ,
w h ic h
d re w
to g e th e r
th e
U n iv ersity
o f
S y d n e y ,
th e
A u stralian
N a tio n a l
R esearch
C o u n c il,
th e
L o n d o n

School of O rie n ta l S tu d ie s , th e R o y a l A n th ro p o lo g ic a l In s titu te , O xford University, the London School of Econom ics (L S E ),

a n d
th e
In te rn a tio n a l
In s titu te
o f
A frican
Languages and
C u ltu re s (IIA L C ). T h e L S E
a n d
th e
IIA L C
w ere
th e
tw o
m ost
im p o rta n t

in s titu tio n s . M a lin o w s k i w a s th e e s s e n tia l lin k b e tw e e n R o c k e fe lle r m o n e y , th e C o lo n ia l O ffic e , a n d th e b e n e fic ia rie s o f th e se resources. M alinow ski coordinated resources, training, and research. T hrough his sem inars at the L SE and his

s tu d e n ts ' w o rk in A fric a , M a lin o w s k i tra in e d v irtu a lly every m em ber of the new schoolof SocialA nthropology except R adcliffe-B row n him self. T h e research w as m ad e possible because of RockefellerIIA LC fellowships.For

a s M ey er F o rte s p o in te d o u t in1 9 4 5 , w ith o u t th e In s titu te
b o th h e a n d m a n y o f th e o th e r fe llo w s w o u ld s im p ly n o t
h a v e
becom e
a n th ro p o lo g is ts ?
F o rte s
h e ld
a n
R F
fello w sh ip
(1 9 3 2 -1 9 3 4 )
a n d
a n
IIA L C

fello w sh ip (1934-1939) fo r his w ork in the G old C oast. In 1939, he becam e a m em ber of the D epartm ent of A nthropology a t

O x fo rd
U n iv e rs ity . T h e
O x fo rd

S o c ia l S c ie n c e s program m e had been receiving R ockefeller supportsince 1 9 3 3 .

T h e re c a n b e n o d o u b t th a t th e g e n e ra l g ra n ts to th e
L S E b y R o c k e fe lle r p h ila n th ro p y

d u rin g th e in te rw a r y e a rs d id e s ta b lis h th a t in s titu tio n a s th e le a d in g c e n tre fo r s o c ia l sc ie n c e in th e B ritis h E m p ire . T h e im p a c t o n S ocialA nthropology w as as dram atic. B etw een 1924and 1938w hen M alinow skileft E ngland and the m ajor grants to the LSE expired, it is clear that R ockefeller m oney c re a te d a th riv in g D e p a rtm e n t o f A n th ro p o lo g y a ro u n d M a lin o w s k i a n d h is d is tin c tiv e v ie w o f th e d is c ip lin e . A s p a rt o f th e first g ra n t fro m th e L S R M , M a lin o w sk i w a s a p p o in te d t o a R e a d e rs h ip in S o c ia l A n th ro p o lo g y in 1924.The m ajor grants to the LSE began in 1927. T h e e m p h a s is w a s o n lin k in g th e n a tu ra l a n d th e s o c ia l s c ie n c e s

th ro u g h
th e
a p p lic a tio n
o f
s u b je c ts
lik e

A n th ro p o lo g y , B io lo g y , P s y c h o lo g y , a n d P h y s io lo g y t o social problem s. T he proposal m ade it clear that Social A n th r o p o lo g y w o u ld u tiliz e th e m e th o d s o f s o c ia l s c ie n c e to s tu d y p rim itiv e life a n d c u s to m s in c o lo n ia l s e ttin g s and th at the problem of 'racial contact' w ould receive p a rtic u la r a tte n tio n J O M a lin o w sk i w as a p p o in te d to th e n e w ly c re a te d C h a ir o f S o c ia l A n th ro p o lo g y in 1 9 2 7 .

T he decision to support SocialA nthropology involved
s im u lta n e o u s ly
th e
re je c tio n
o f
D iffu sio n ism .
I n

D e c e m b e r 1 9 2 6 , R o c k e fe lle r p h ila n th ro p y re c e iv e d tw o p ro p o sa ls fro m th e U n iv e rsity o f L o n d o n . In a d d itio n to th e p ro p o sa l fro m

the L SE , a second w as received fro m U n iv e rs ity C o lle g e . T h e C o lle g e w a s a s tro n g h o ld o f D iffu s io n is t A n th ro p o lo g y in B rita in a t a tim e w h e n th e w h o le s u b je c t w as v irtu a lly n o n -e x is te n t o u ts id e L o n d o n in te rm s o f u n iv e rs ity p o s ts . E llio t-S m ith a n d P e rry

b o th
h e ld
s e n io r p o s itio n s
in
A n a to m y
a n d

C u ltu ra l A n th ro p o lo g y re sp e c tiv e ly . E llio t-S m ith s e n t in a proposal to the R F requesting \u00a3300,000,the am ount to be splitbetw een Psychology and A nthropology?'The p ro p o s a l w as d isc u sse d in te rn a lly w ith o th e r o ffic e rs a n d w ith B eardsley R um l, D irector of the LSR M . It w as d e c id e d to re je c t th e p ro p o sa l a n d th e re fo re to re je c t D iffu s io n is t S tu d ie s . In re s p o n s e , E llio t-S m ith w ro te a s c a th in g le tte r, w h ic h in c lu d e d th e c o m m e n t th a t h e fo u n d a m a z in g '...th e a c tio n o f th e L a u ra S p e lm a n T ru s t in s u b s id iz in g th o s e w h o a re w re c k in g a n th ro p o lo g ic a l study in this ~ o u n try ? ~

S o m e o n e w ro te in p e n c il a t th e s id e o f th e le tte r, 'T h is m e a n s M a lin o w s k i o f L o n d o n S c h o o l o f E ! R o c k e fe lle r p h ila n th ro p y m a d e a c o n s c io u s c h o ic e to

support what they
re g a rd e d
as the
m o re

scientific approach. It is the case how ever that Elliot S m ith 's id io s y n c ra tic a n d e x tre m e fo rm o f d iffu s io n is m h a d v irtu a lly n o s u p p o r t a n y w h e re o u ts id e o f U n iv e rs ity C o lle g e , e s p e c ia lly a fte r R iv e rs ' d e a th in 1 9 2 2 , a n d th a t M a lin o w s k i, a h ig h ly s k ille d a c a d e m ic p o litic ia n , h a d b e e n c u ltiv a tin g th e R o c k e fe lle rs o u r c e b 3

M a lin o w s k i's d e p a rtm e n t w as th e c e n tra l a n c h o r fo r
S o c ia l
A n th ro p o lo g y
d u rin g
th e
interw ar
y e a rs .
L e c tu r e s h ip s
i n
A n th ro p o lo g y
a n d
C o lo n ia l

A d m in is tra tio n w ere a d d e d to th e D e p a rtm e n t in 1 9 3 3 . L ucy M air, a form er research assistant to M alinow ski, b e c a m e th e le c tu re r in C o lo n ia l A d m in is tra tio n . F u rth e r,

M a lm o w s k i's 'fa m o u s s e m in a r in e v ita b ly d re w m u c h o f
its life an d sustenance'from

a c c o u n ts o f th e w o rk th a t w as supported by these grants.T hree of the m ost fam ous m e m b e rs o f th e S c h o o l o f S o c ia l A n th ro p o lo g y (F irth , Schapera, and

Evans-Pritchard) began

th e tra d itio n w hen they becam e the first research assistants. Yet th e e s s e n tia l

e le m e n t
i n
th e
d e v e lo p m e n t
6f
S o c ia l
A n th ro p o lo g y
w as
th e
a v a ila b ility
o f
r e s e a r c h
fd io w sh ip s.

W h ile M a lin o w s k i h a d b e e n in s tru m e n ta l in o b ta in in g m o re R F fe llo w sh ip s fo r a n th ro p o lo g is ts in th e e a rly 1930s,it w as his support of the IIA L C w hich w as m ost s ig n ific a n t.

H e
a n d
R a d c liffe -B ro w n p ro v id e d
th e
n e c e s s a ry le g itim a tio n th a t c o n v in c e d th e R F to a w a rd
a m ajor grant to
the Institute in
1931. M alinow ski

o u tlin e d w h a t w as to b e c o m e th e fo c u s o f th e IIA L C proposal in 1929. T his description appeared under the h e a d in g , 'P ra c tic a l A n th ro p o lo g y : in th e J a n u a r y is s u e o f

th e
In s titu te 's
jo u rn a l,
A frica .
M a lin o w s k i
em phasized the role that the IIALC

should play in b rid g in g th e g a p b e tw e e n th e th e o re tic a l c o n c e rn s o f th e a n th ro p o lo g is t

a n d
th e
p ra c tic a l
c o n c e rn s
o f

th e a d m in is tra to r. T h e p ra c tic a l m a n s h o u ld s ta te h is n e e d a

d th e s c ie n tific a n th ro p o lo g is t s h o u ld p u rs u e th e m o s t fruitful line of research in light of these needs. F urther, th e

a n th ro p o lo g is t
m ust,
i n
M a lin o w s k i's
w ords,

'...becom e m ore concerned in the anthropology of the c h a n g in g A fric a n a n d in th e a n th ro p o lo g y o f th e c o n ta c t o f w h ite a n d c o lo u re d o f E u ro p e a n c u ltu re a n d p rim itiv e trib a l

l i f e :
l4
M a lin o w s k i
w as
c o n v in c e d
th a t

a n th ro p o lo g ic a l s tu d y o f p rim itiv e c u ltu re s , o f s u c h a s p e c ts a s e c o n o m ic s , la n d te n u re , la w w o u ld le a d to 's c ie n tific c o n tro l o f C o lo n ia l c o -o p e ra tio n ! M a lin o w s k i c o n c lu d e d th e p ie c e by o u tlin in g th e p ra c tic a l s te p s th a t th e

In s titu te
m ig h t
ta k e .
T he
l i s t
in c lu d e d
th e
encouragem ent
o f
th e
F u n c tio n a l
S c h o o l
o f

A n th ro p o lo g y , o rg a n iz in g th e fie ld w o rk , th e tra in in g o f c o lo n ia l a d m in is tra to rs in F u n c tio n a l A n th ro p o lo g y , a n d fin a lly , ta k in g th e ro le o f a c e n tra l e x c h a n g e fo r th e p ra c tic a l a n d th e o re tic a l in te re s ts in A n th ro p o lo g y .

R a d c liffe -B ro w n a d d e d h is v o ic e t o M a lin o w s k i's in
Novem ber 1930 when he sent in a 'M em orandum
o n

A n th ro p o lo g ic a l R e se a rc h to th e R E ? 5 . R a d c l i f f e - B r o w n p o in te d t o th e u rg e n t n e e d fo r th e s y s te m a tic s tu d y o f c u ltu re s o f b a c k w a rd p e o p le s b e fo re th e y a re m o d ifie d o r d e s tro y e d th ro u g h c o n ta c t w ith E u ro p e a n c iv iliz a tio n . H e c o n tra s te d th e 'n e w e r s o c ia l a n th ro p o lo g y ' w ith th e o ld e r H is to ric a l S c h o o l, d e s c rib in g th e la tte r a s a m a tte r o f c o n je c tu re a b o u t th e re c o n s tru c tio n s o f h is to ry . In o u tlin in g

th e
s u p e rio rity
o f

S o c ia l A n th ro p o lo g y , R a d c liffe -B ro w n lis te d fiv e c h ie f fe a tu re s o f th e S c h o o l. F irs t, S o c ia l A n th ro p o lo g y a im e d a t '...o b ta in in g m a te ria l fo r th e fo rm u la tio n o f g e n e ra l la w s o f s o c ia l life a n d s o c ia l d e v e lo p m e n t! T h e la w s w o u ld

have the sam e validity as the law s of general science. T he past w as to be left to the historian

a n d a rc h a e o lo g is t, w h ile th e a n th ro p o lo g is t d e a lt w ith th e p re s e n t a n d th e fu tu re . S e c o n d , th is a p p r o a c h w a s , in h is w o rd s , '...b a s e d o n th e view th at a culture is an integrated system in w hich each e le m e n t (in s titu tio n , c u s to m , b e lie f) p la y sas p e c ific p a r t in the relation to the w hole: It w as concerned prim arily w ith th e 'fu n c tio n a l s tu d y o f c u ltu re s l A ll a s p e c ts o f a c u ltu re h a d to b e s tu d ie d in re la tio n to o n e a n o th e r a n d in re la tio n to th e w h o le . S o c ia lA n th ro p o lo g y n e c e s s a rily in v o lv e d th e u n ita ry s tu d y o f c u ltu re . T h ird , in d o in g a fu n c tio n a l s tu d y , th e fie ld w o rk e r h a d to in te g ra te o b s e rv a tio n

a n d
in te rp re ta tio n
i n
o n e in v e s tig a tio n .

F o u rth , th is a p p ro a c h re c o g n iz e d th e im p o rta n c e of s tu d y in g c u ltu re c o n ta c t fo r b o th s c ie n tific , th e o re tic a l re a s o n s a s w e ll a s th e p ra c tic a l o n e s . F in a lly , S o c ia l

of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...