/  2
 
    U    N   C   O    R    R    E   C    T    E    DP    R   O   O    F
12
Most cancer in firefighters is due to radio-frequency radiation exposure
3
not inhaled carcinogens
4
S. Milham
*
5
Washington State Department of Health (retired) Olympia Washington, USA
6
8
a r t i c l e i n f o
9
Article history:
10Received 14 April 200911Accepted 18 April 200912Available online xxxx
131 4
s u m m a r y
15
Recent reviews and reports of cancer incidence and mortality in firefighters conclude that they are at an
16
increased risk of a number of cancers. These include leukemia, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin’s lym-
17
phoma, male breast cancer, malignant melanoma, and cancers of the brain, stomach, colon, rectum, pros-
18
tate, urinary bladder, testes, and thyroid. Firefighters are exposed to a long list of recognized or probable
19
carcinogens in combustion products and the presumed route of exposure to these carcinogens is by inha-
20
lation. Curiously, respiratory system cancers and diseases are usually not increased in firefighters as they
21
are in workers exposed to known inhaled carcinogens. The list of cancers with increased risk in firefight-
22
ers strongly overlaps the list of cancers at increased risk in workers exposed to electromagnetic fields
23
(EMF) and radiofrequency radiation (RFR). Firefighters have increased exposure to RFR in the course of 
24
their work, from the mobiletwo-wayradio communications devices which they routinely use while
25
fighting fires, and at times from firehouse and fire vehicle radio transmitters. I suggest that some of 
26
the increased cancer risk in firefighters is caused by RFR exposure, and is therefore preventable. The pre-
27
cautionary principle should be applied to reduce the risk of cancer in firefighters, and workman’s com-
28
pensation rules will necessarily need to be modified.
29
Ó
2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
30
31
Background
32
In the 1970s I set up a system for coding and analyzing the
33
occupational information on the Washington State death record.
34
Three volumes of these analyses have been published by National
35
Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) beginning in
36
1976. The final NIOSH volume was published in 1997, and now
37
Washington State occupational mortality data since 1950 is avail-
38
able on-line[1]and is updated automatically. The first monograph,
39
OccupationalMortality in WashingtonState published by NIOSH in
40
1976 covering deaths in the years1950–1971showed that Wash-
41
ington State firefighters had increased mortality due to brain can-
42
cer, malignant melanoma, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. None of 
43
these cancers had an intuitive connection to inhaled carcinogens.
44
In 2004, I examined a cluster of three male breast cancers in of-
45
fice workers exposed to high levels of EMF[2]. This added to an al-
46
ready impressive body of reports linking male breast cancer to EMF
47
and RFR [3]. This cancer is so rare that its repeated appearance in
48
EMF/RFR exposure situations functions like a sentinel cancer for
49
these exposures. When a Florida firefighters’ cohort was reported
50
as having an increased incidence of male breast cancer[4], the
51
hypothesis that RFR causes some firefighters’ cancer was born.
52
Cancers increased in firefighters
53
Firefightershavebeenshowntobeatincreasedriskofdeveloping
54
anumberofcancers.Arecentreviewof32studiesandameta-anal-
55
ysis of cancer risk among firefighters[5]concluded that multiple
56
myeloma,non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma,prostate cancerandtesticular
57
cancer were probably associated with firefighting, and that leuke-
58
mia, skin cancer, malignant melanoma, brain cancer, cancer of the
59
rectum, colon, stomach, buccal cavity and pharynx were possibly
60
associatedwithfirefighting.Anotherreview[6]addsurinarybladder
61
cancertotheprobablelist.A2005studylinksmalebreastcancerand
62
thyroid cancer with firefighting[4].
63
Carcinogenic exposures in firefighters
64
Firefighters are exposed to a long list of carcinogens in combus-
65
tion products including asbestos[7], polycyclic aromatic hydrocar-
66
bons[8], benzene[9],lead[10]and aromatic amines[11]. The
67
major routeof exposureto these carcinogensis by inhalation.Inha-
68
lation of carcinogens ordinarily leads to development of respira-
69
tory cancers. For example, coke oven workers[12]who inhale
70
coal tar pitch volatiles, and copper smelter workers[13]who in-
71
hale arsenic trioxide are at increased risk of developing lung can-
72
cer. Respiratory cancers, including lung and laryngeal cancers
73
and respiratory diseases like bronchitis and emphysema, are usu-
74
ally not at increased risk in firefighters. The 32 paper review and
0306-9877/$ - see front matter
Ó
2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2009.04.020
*
Address: Washington State Department of Health (retired) Olympia Washing-ton, 2318 Gravelly Beach Loop NW, Olympia WA 98501, USA. Tel.: +1 360 866 0256.
E-mail address:
smilham2@comcast.netMedical Hypotheses xxx (2009) xxx–xxx
 
Contents lists available atScienceDirect
Medical Hypotheses
YMEHY 5199 No. of Pages 2, Model 5G11 May 2009 Disk Used
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Please cite this article in press as: Milham S. Most cancer in firefighters is due to radio-frequency radiation exposure not inhaled carcinogens. Med Hy-potheses (2009), doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2009.04.020

Share & Embed

More from this user

Commenting has been disabled.