Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
13-06-20 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court – Response by the Requester to Inspect on Judge Alon's May 23, 2013 Decision in re – inspection of court file.

13-06-20 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court – Response by the Requester to Inspect on Judge Alon's May 23, 2013 Decision in re – inspection of court file.

Ratings:
(0)
|Views: 2|Likes:
Judge Esperanza Alon continues to deny access to court records.
Judge Esperanza Alon continues to deny access to court records.

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on Aug 01, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/14/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
Human Rights Alert, NGO
"JosephZernik,PhD"314403144POBox31440,Jerusalem9131391313
123456xyz@gmail.com;
13-06-20
In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court –Response by the Requester to Inspect on Judge Alon's May23, 2013 Decision in re – inspection of court file.
JudgeEsperanzaAloncontinuestodenyaccesstocourtrecords.
#Caption and NoPage
1.
13-06-20Inre:RSZ(25607-03-13)intheHaifaMagistrateCourt–ResponsebytheRequestertoInspectonJudge Alon'sMay23,2013Decisioninre–inspectionofcourtfile.[Englishtranslation]
2
2.
13-06-20Inre:RSZ(25607-03-13)intheHaifaMagistrateCourt–ResponsebytheRequestertoInspectonJudge Alon'sMay23,2013Decisioninre–inspectionofcourtfile.[Hebreworiginal]
3
LINKS:
[1]10-06-01Inre:RSZ(1829-06-10and25607-03-13)intheHaifaMagistrateCourt–FraudulentAffidavitofRobertZernikandConsentLettersbyDrorZernikandUriZernikhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/147093295/[2]13-04-29Inre:RSZ(1829-06-10and25607-03-13)intheHaifaMagistrateCourt–NoticeoffalseanddeliberatelymisleadingApril7,2013RequesttoAddDrorZernikasConservator http://www.scribd.com/doc/148131383/[3]13-05-22Inre:RSZ(1829-06-10and25607-03-13)intheHaifaMagistrateCourt–DeclarationofJosephZernik:JudgeEsperanzaAlon-masterofthemysticalsecretsofcourtprocedure,orobstructionistwithimpunity?http://www.scribd.com/doc/147192877/
1/3
 
In the Haifa Magistrate Court25607-03-13In re: RSZFiler: Conservatee's son, Joseph Zernik 
PO Box 31440, Jerusalem, 91313
Parties (to the best understanding of the Filer):
1.
Conservator Robert Zernik, by his counsel AmosZadika
2.
Counsel for the State Attorney, Ministry of Justice
3.
Counsel for the State Attorney, Ministry of Welfare
Other Conservatee's Children:
1.
Dror Zernik – Conservatee's son
2.
Uri Zernik – Conservatee's son
=
Response by the Requester to Inspect on Judge Alon's May 23, 2013Decision in re – inspection of court file
I, the undersigned, Joseph Zernik, ID no..., knowing that I must say thetruth, and that I may be liable for penalties stipulated by law if I do not doso, declare as follows:1.The undersigned, the Conservatee's son, files herein response onJudge Alon's May 23, 2013 Decision, in instant court file, in re – Request to Inspect court file. The decision appears to contradict theJudge Alon's May 2, 2013 Decision in instant court file, also in re – Request to Inspect court file. With it, the filer hopes that Judge Alonwould straighten the apparent contradictions between the twodecisions.2.According to the Judge Alon May 2, 2013 Decision, “in instant courtfile the Requester is party to the litigation. Therefore, pursuant to the principles of transparency and equality among parties, he is entitled... “.Therefore, Judge Alon deems the Requester a party to the litigation ininstant court file.3.The Regulations of the Courts – Inspection of Court Files (2003),Regulation 3, says:3. The Right to Inspect by Parties to LitigationA party to litigation is permitted to inspect a court file, where he is a party, following completion of Notice of Inspection, pursuant to Form No 1, unless he is prohibited bylaw from inspecting the court file.
2/3
 
4.The Supreme Court Decision in Israeli Civil Rights Association vMinister of Justice (5917/97) also affirms that Regulation.5.The Judge Alon May 23, 2013 Decision, pertaining to RepeatRequest to Inspect Court File says, “For response by the Respondersand Counsel for the State Attorney by July 7, 2013.” In such Decision,Judge Alon treats the Requester to Inspect as if he were not a party tothe litigation, pursuant to the above cited Regulation.6. Therefore, the two above referenced Decisions by Judge Alonappear contradictory.7.Therefore, Judge Alon is asked to clarify:
As of this date, is the filer, Joseph Zernik, the Conservatee's son, aparty, or a non-party to instant litigation.
Dated: June 18, 2013[Signed]________ Joseph Zernik, Conservatee's son
3/3

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->