Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Gustavo Alexis Murillo-Borjas, A097 744 763 (BIA July 30, 2013)

Gustavo Alexis Murillo-Borjas, A097 744 763 (BIA July 30, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 150|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) granted a joint interlocutory appeal of a denial of a joint motion for administrative closure because the immigration judge's order set forth no basis or rationale warranting the denial of the motion. The decision was written by Member David Holmes and joined by Member Neil Miller and Member Molly Kendall-Clark.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) granted a joint interlocutory appeal of a denial of a joint motion for administrative closure because the immigration judge's order set forth no basis or rationale warranting the denial of the motion. The decision was written by Member David Holmes and joined by Member Neil Miller and Member Molly Kendall-Clark.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Aug 02, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/12/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Zoltan, Paul S Esq.Law Oices of Paul S ZoltanPO. Box 821118Dallas TX 75382
   
Executive Oe r Imgation Revew
Board ofImmigration AppealsOce ofthe Clerk
5107 lesburg Pik, Su 2000Fas Church. Vrgna 220/
HS/CE Oice of Chief Counsel -DAL125 E John Carpente Fwy Ste. 500Ing TX 750622324Name: MURLLO-BORJAS GUSTAVO A 097-744763Date of ths notce 7/30/203
nclosed is a copy of the Board's ecision and orde in he above-rerenced case.Enclosure
 Mb:H, vd B,  PKd-C y
Sincerely,
D
C
Donna CarrChef Cerk
Lg k
Cite as: Gustavo Alexis Murillo-Borjas, A097 744 763 (BIA July 30, 2013)
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
 
U.S Department of Justice
Executive Oce r Imaon RevewDecson of he Board ofmaton AppealFall Chuch, Vgna
041
Fies: A09 7 63
-
Daas,
T
Daten re: GUSTA VO ALEXS MURLO-BORJAS MOV PROCEEDGSERLOCORY APPEAON BEA OF RESPONDENPa S Zot, EsqireON BEAL O DSDan GividenAssisant Chie ConseAPLCAON: Adminisative cosre
JUL 3
0213
he Depatment o omead Secity (S) and the espondent have jointy ed aninteroctory appea om he mmiation Jdges Febay 5 203 order hat granted he paies motion to eopen these
p
oceedings, bt denied the paies motion to administativeycose the eopened poceedings o avoid piecemea eview o the myiad o qestions whichmay aise in the corse o poceedings bee s, this Boad does not odinaiy enteaininteroctoy appeas
See Matter of Ruiz-Campuzano
1 &N Dec 108 (BA 99). We have, howeve, on occasion red on the merits o inteoctory appeas where we deemed itnecessayto coect ecing probems in the handing o cases by mmigation Jdges
See e.g.,Matter of Guevara
20
l&N
ec 238 (BA 1990 991)
;
Matter of Dobere
20
I&N
Dec 188(BA 1990)Wewi entetain this appea and vacate the mmigation Jdges ode insoar as hat odedenied the paies joint motion to adminisativey cose he poceedings Whie an mmigationJdge has the timate athority to deny a joint motion ed by he parties, he migationJdges ode does not eect hat he accoded any weight or consideation to the ctacircmstances presented in he paies motion or to the ageement o the paies as to theappopriate cose o action in these poceedingsFuther, othe than a citation to
Matter ofAvetisyan
25 &N Dec 88 (BA 202) egading an mmigration Jdgesesponsibiity  exercising independent jdgment and esponsibiity in consideing a motion toadministrativeycose proceedings and a concso statement that the parties motion "ied to povide a ega basis  administrativey cosing proceedings, the mmigration Jdges order sets rth no basis o ationae that wod wart the denia o the joint motionGiven thecicaces pesene, te oint moion to aminisaiey cose tese poceedings wi begated
1
he mmiation Jdge ganted the motion to eopen the poceedings based on a ack o adeqatenotice, whichimpicity escinded his Jne  2004
in absentia
 ode o remova
2
he S ha sbmited a motion  concent consideation o 13 othe eatedcases presentng a simia isse that we do not nd necessay to addess in the contet o thsineoctoy appea
Cite as: Gustavo Alexis Murillo-Borjas, A097 744 763 (BIA July 30, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->