• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
"No
person
shall
be
held
to
answer
tor a
capital,
or
otnerwise
iniamous
crime,
unless
on a
presentment
or
indictment
of a
Grand
Jury, except
in cases
arising
in the
land
or
naval
forces,
or in the
Militia,
when
in actual
service
in time of War orpublic
danger;
nor
shall
any
person
be
subject
for the
same
offence
to be twice put
in
jeopardy
of
life
or
limb;
nor
shall
be
compelled
in any
criminal
case
to be a
witness
against himself,
nor be
deprived
of
life,
liberty,
or
property,
without
due
__
_.;.....
_
process
of
law;,
nor
shall
private
property
be
taken
for
public
.use,
without
just
compensation."
-
U.S.
onstitution
5th
Amendment
So let me
make
tills
absolutely
clear.
The
United States
has
political prisoners
and
for
those
who
want
to
think that
we are so
honorable,
you
should remember what
was
said about Nazi Germany. When they came for the labor
unionists,
nobody saidanything. When they came
for the
gypsies,nobody said anything. When they came
for
all
the
dissenters,
nobody said anything. When they camefor thejews, nobody said
anything.
When they came for me, there was nobody left to saying to.
A
European film crew has already contacted the Bureau of
Prisons.
I have agreed
to
cooperate
andthey willbemakinga
documentary
onthis
case.
Atleasttwoothers
are
writing investigative bookson mycase. They sentmehere quicklyandhave made
every
effort to arbitrarily keep me in prison, I have been called
America's
Count
ofMonte
DeChristo,
or
America's
Nelson Mandella,
to the Guy Who
Knew
Too
Much.
When my
case started,
the
Wall Street Journal plastered pictures
of
myself
and
former Prime
Minister
Lady Margaret
Thatcher
together.
I was
very angry
at how
suchprivate pictures were being used in the press. I was told by my lawyers that this
was
how the Government warns politicians to stand back, or else they will get tainted
What I
write
can be
verified
by
anyone
who
likes
to do
so
s
There
is far
more
thatI
would like
to
say,
but the
evidence
is not
available
to the
general public
so
I will keep my mouth shut until I can reveal what will shock the world. Unlikethose
on the net who now act
behind fake names, whatever
I
write
can be and
will
be
challenged in a court of law. So I am very careful only to write what can be proven.
Why
would Goldman Sachs grab whatever
it can
from
our
mondeling? Perhaps
it is
bestdescribedas thecurious cat.Theprimary thing thatthe
"Club"
wantedof me
was
to join and then spout out forecasts to influence
markets.
In other words,
people
j
udge others by
themselves.
They assumed and told the Commodity
Furtures
TradingCommission
that I was manipulating the world economy because of the sheer size ofour corporate and institutional client base. They argued nobody could predict a
specific
day in the
future years
in
advance
and
watch
the
world
go
nuts.
Thus, thatwas in their view a "power" they wanted, and I argued
did
not exist. I routinely had
made
public warnings when they were targeting a particular market. In March
1999,
I gave a seminar in Tokyo, warned that the
"club"
was going to manipulate the yen
and
warned
our
clients
in
Tokyo (about
70% of the
corporate
market),
to
lock-intheir currency
for the
annual March roll. They did,
the yen
rallied because
the
"club"
lost
at
least
$1
billion
on
that failed attempt.
Perhaps you
will recall Maxwell,
the
Jewish
billionare
guy who
fell
off his
yachtand drowned in the river in
London.
Then it turned out he lost a few hundredmillion pounds sterling that just happened to be bad trading with employee pension
fund
money.
Any you
think
he
really fell?
You
think that trading
was not
part
ofthe
"club"
at all?The
CFTC
has always been a
puppet
of the
"club"
and you really think that anyconspiracy theory can be ignored when offical
court
documents compelled me to evendefend
in a
court
of law
against
the
CFPC
allegations instigated
by the
"club"
thatI was manipulating the world economy?
What
really goes on you would never believe!
 
MONEY
SUPPLY v
DEBT
Some
ssern
confused
as to why the CDO and CDS
become part
of the
money supply.
The
mere fact we are now bailing them out, demonstrates they are monetary
instruments.
The
iswhatIcall partof the
"legal
money supply" that becomes obvious onceyou are
-involved
in international capital
flows.
It
is
monetized
by
the Rule of Law.Part
of the
talked about scam with Goldman Sachs,
is
that
it was
owed
at
least
$20
billion
in CDS
claims
against
AIG.
So,
the
government bails
out AIG,
they pay off the
debt owed
to
Goldman
in the
form
of
CDS,
and
Goldman
can
thenpretend its exposure was minimal. The CDS became a "legal" asset that gave falseconfidence to lend more and increase the velocity of money relying upon the CDS.Money Supply becomes
the
velocity
of
money that
is
created
by the
banks throughlending.
If
you put
$100
in the
bank,
it
lends that
$100
to
another,
you
both have
a
statement from
the
bank stating
you
have each
$100.
This
is a
legal form
of
a Ponzi scheme. Now that second person buys a tangible property from yet a thirdperson with that
$100
making that property now also a constructive form of moneywhereas
the
third party
now has the
$100
and let us say the
bank lends
out
thatdeposit again
to
another
and now we
have
4
people with
the
same $100.
What
people also fail
to
understand
is
that this velocity
of
money creatinga leveraged constructive form of a larger money supply, is only possible because
of
aestablished RuleofLaw.Youwillnotdeposit money unlessyoutrustthecourts will enforce your property rights. This is why third world countries arepoor - not because they lack assets, but because they lack the Rule of Law. They
can
have trillions of dollars of assets like exist in Africa, but if there is notrust
in the
Rule
of
Law, then there
can be no
investment,
and
thus
the
assets
remain
worthelsss.
It is the Rule of Law that transforms assets into money.During the
80's
and the takeover boom, I advised a lot of so called takeover
artists.
But what I showed them how to do was transform debt into a performing
asset.
One of my clients back then was Alan Bond of Australia.
I
showed his staffhow to borrow in one currency that would decline against the currency of thenation that was the target asset. As the currency declined in which the loan wasdenominated againstthecurrencyof the
asset,
one wasableto pay off thedebt
at
20%-40% less compared
to the
asset.
We
were able
to
transform debt into
a
performing asset making even up to 40% profit when the target asset broke even orlost slightly.
TORT
REFORM
&
HEALTHCARE
The
healthcare problem will destroy
the
American economy
by
itself.
It is not
a matter of just paying for those who are not covered. Both Republican and Democratsare
predominantly
lawyers.
Because
of the
lawsuits, tests
are
being done that doctorsknow they
do not
need,
but do so
because
of the
lawyers.
The
insurance premiums
areinsane"and
unless there
is a
limit
to
this insanity,
it
will destroy
the
whole
system
Class Action lawsuitsdo notprotectthepublicas onemight think.Thelawyersget
to
keep 30-40% at least plus costs. I know a few who have made unseen amounts ofcash. Legal reform
is the
answer.
Why
not
make shaddy doctors subject
to the
samecriminal laws they inflict upon anyone connected with Wall
Street?
Thisisonlyastarting point. But we have to start. Class action suits raise the prices for healthcare preventing American jobs from staying in the country.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...