Office of Administrative Hearings
1400 Was Wasaga, Suit 10 - Ph Aim 85077
Teepaae (60) 342 928 FAX 61029827
Janice K, Brewer Cliff J. Vanell
Governor Director
May 26, 2008
Karen Osborne, Elections Director
Maricopa County Department of Elections
111 S. 3rd Avenue, #102
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Re: 08A-0001-MCDE
In the Matter oft
JOEL FOX dba SCA,
Petitioner.
Dear Ms. Osborne:
Please find the decision of the Office of Administrative Hearings for the above
entitled matter.
Sincerely, ’) af
Clift Ih
Direct
‘Mission Statemeat: We will contribute to the quality of life ia the State of Arizona by
impartially hensing the contested matters of ous lellow citizens arising out of State regulation,
81/28 BON Tetepsezaa = 60:41 600z/92/501 IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
3||In the Matter of: No. 08A-0001-MCDE
4 || JOEL FOX dba SCA
Petitioner ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
. DECISION
g HEARING: March 31, 2008; record held open until May 5, 2009
iy APPEARANCES: Joel Fox on behalf of Joel Fox d.b.a. SCA; Attomey Jeffrey
"')| Messing of Poli & Ball, P.L.C. for Maricopa Gounty
a ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Thomas Shedden
" The Maricopa County Department of Elections issued a Compliance Order
'§]/ alleging that Mr. Joe! Fox, d.b.a. SCA, had violated the State's election laws. The
"8|| County seeks civil penalties. Mr. Fox requested a hearing at which evidence and legal
7) argument were taken.
a4 ‘The County met the burden of persuasion to show that Mr. Fox d.b.a. SCA
"S| violated A.R.S. § 16-913(8)(2) and is subject to a $450 civil penalty for that violation,
20|/ The Gounty met the burden of persuasion to shaw that Mr. Fox d.b.a. SCA is in
211] violation A.R.S. § 16-904(\), which requires certain records to be provided to the
22|/ County. The County did not meet the burden of persuasion ta show that Mr. Fax d.b.a.
231/ SCA is subject to a $315,000 civil penalty issued pursuant to A.R.S. § 16-904(J)
241] because the Compliance Order issued in this matter did not canform to the requirement
251| in A.R.S. § 16-924 that Mr. Fox d.b.a. SCA be afforded 20 days to come into
25|| compliance.
a7 Based on the evidence of record, the Administrative Law Judge makes the
28 || following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order:
= ene ee
0 oaks Arana 85007
iia
at/eo Bd Tetersezes = s8:4T 60ez/9z/S0EINDINGS OF FACT
1. On December 31, 2008, the Maricopa County Department of Elections (the
“County’) issued a Notice of Hearing setting the above-captioned matter for February 4,
2009, 5
2. The Notice of Hearing provided that the “issue ta be addressed at the hearing is
whether Petitioner [Joel Fox d.b.a. SCA] violated the requirements of A.R.S. §§ 16-904
and 16-813(B)(2)[_] IF so, did the Compliance Order in this case properly impase clvil
penatties?”
3. The matter was continued and was convened on March 31, 2009. The record
was held open until May 5, 2009, to allow for submission of post-hearing legal
argument.
BACKGROUND
4. The Arizona Republican Party received fram an entity known as SCA a check
for $80,000 dated August 21, 2008, and a check for $25,000 dated September 10,
2008. Mr. Joel Fax signed the two checks.
5. On Octaber 14, 2008, Maricopa County received a Complaint from the Arizona
Democratic Party alleging that SCA and the Arizona Republican Party had violated
state elections law. See Exhibit 1 (Complaint, admitted as part of the administrative
record, but not for the truth of any matter asserted therein). The Complaint was also
filed with the Arizona Secretary of State.
6. On October 18, 2008, the Arizona Republican Party refunded $105,000 ta SCA.
7. Ina letter dated October 20, 2008, the State Election Director, Joseph
Kanefield, requested that the Republican Party file a Response to the Complaint. See
Exhibit 2.
* 18. On October 20, 2008, Maricopa County Director of Elections, Karen shore,
“in accordance with A.R.S. § 16-924" found that there was reasonable cause to believe
*"|| that SCA had violated A.R.S. §§ 16-902.01 (by failing to register as a political
* |! committee); 16-907(B) (earmarking contributions); and 16-916 (failing ta file campaign
finance reports). See Exhibit 4.
BI/Pa avd Tetepsezas = GB:ZT 6A0z/9z/S0