Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Numsa general secretary Irvin Jim responds to Jessie Duarte

Numsa general secretary Irvin Jim responds to Jessie Duarte

Ratings: (0)|Views: 18,506|Likes:
Published by CityPress
Comrade Jessie Duarte wrote to the City Press, “Don’t mask exploitation with claims of conspiracy”, Sunday August 05, 2013, in reference to the allegations of sexual harassment against Comrade Zwelinzima Vavi, general secretary of Cosatu.
Comrade Jessie Duarte wrote to the City Press, “Don’t mask exploitation with claims of conspiracy”, Sunday August 05, 2013, in reference to the allegations of sexual harassment against Comrade Zwelinzima Vavi, general secretary of Cosatu.

More info:

Published by: CityPress on Aug 06, 2013
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
See more
See less

08/11/2013

 
 
Numsa general secretary Irvin Jim responds to Jessie Duarte's column in City Press
Comrade Jessie Duarte wrote to the City Press,
“Don’t mask exploitation with claims of conspiracy”, Sunday August 05, 2013,
in reference to the allegations of sexual harassmentagainst Comrade Zwelinzima Vavi, general secretary of Cosatu.
 
The accuser has since dropped the charge at Cosatu. Comrade Duarte makes several veryserious unfounded and defamatory accusations against Comrade Zwelinzima Vavi. Theseaccusations actually border on criminal libel.She accuses Vavi of engineering an abusive power relationship with the female colleague byfraudulently employing her in expectation of sexual favours in return. She has not botheredto establish whether the appointment was sanctioned and approved by the Cosatu NationalOffice Bearers.She vehemently dismisses any possibility of a conspiracy and boldly states that:
“This is not a conspiracy, there is no conspiracy, and there is only
one reality in the saddrama that has caused smirks and contemptuous comments on the social media platforms. A man in a powerful position engineered a job for a woman and assumed that sex would be
his payment”.
 She then concludes by exhorting women to rise, and I guess, defend themselves against theVavis of this world.In case you do not know who Jessie Duarte is, this is the woman who is the current deputysecretary general of the African National Congress (ANC), whose current national leadershipis extre
mely unhappy with Vavi’s unfailing denunciations of widespread ANC government
corruption, failure to transform the education and health systems inherited from our apartheid past, e-tolls, labour brokers, collapsing local government, among many other failings of the ANC in the past 18 years.
Crucially, Vavi has consistently railed against the ANC’s failure to radically implement the
Freedom Charter, and today, on behalf of Cosatu, Vavi has condemned the NDP as simplyanother version of the abominable GEAR policy which led to the massive shedding of jobsand the destruction of our manufacturing base.
Jessie Duarte’s position, as the Deputy Secretary General, is the second most powerful,
organisationally, in the ANC. From our analyses of her article in the City press, she has,logically, a responsibility to contribute to the destruction of Vavi, the most vocal critique of the policies of the African National Policies, even as Vavi heads the largest formation in the ANC led tripartite Alliance.With all this in mind, only a fool, and a fool of a very special kind, would be stupid enough todismiss the possibility of conspiracy behind the sexual harassment charges against Vavi.
 
Duarte wants us to ignore that the accuser herself and her husband made a demand for R2m from Vavi, in exchange for them to let the matter go away, and the accuser alleged athird force was willing to give her R1m to get Vavi nailed to the cross. Jessie completelydisregards these facts and evidence from the accuser. Why? What is Jessie in a hurry to
cover up by reducing this sordid affair into “an abusive power relationship”?
 Could this in fact be the retreat of evil forces whose scheme to destroy Vavi has backfired?Why would the Deputy Secretary General of the ANC automatically want the GeneralSecretary of Cosatu to be crucified and destroyed without giving the General Secretary of Cosatu a hearing first?We ask of Duarte, would consistency, perhaps, defeat conspiracy theories?The ANC of which Duarte is a leader is not immune to sex scandals.We have, over the many decades, lived with scandalous sexual behaviour by senior leadership in the national liberation movement involving men entrusted with executing andleading our National Democratic Revolution. Today we hear from the grapevine of presentday leaders who have been deceiving their wives or partners by having sexual encounterswith fellow Comrades or office staff or subordinates.We expect the same critique to be publicly advanced by the likes of Cde Duarte and the
 ANC Women’s League.
Where were they during the allegations of rape against JZ involvingan HIV infected child whose parents would have been devastated, had they been alive, thata family friend and comrade could abuse and betray the trust of the family with whom therehad been fraternal and comradely relations in exile when the complainant was but a merechild. And while we are on this subject, where exactly is the poor woman in question, in the JZsaga?In dealing with matters of consistency, it is to be noted that COSATU, under the Stewardshipof Zwelinzima Vavi, responded in a very principled fashion to the JZ rape saga when thefollowing press statement were released by Cosatu on 5 May 2006;
"The Congress of South African Trade Unions welcomes the apology by ANC Deputy President Jacob Zuma for having unprotected sex with an HIV-positive woman. COSATU has repeatedly urged everyone to abide by the ABC rules to prevent being infected by HIV - Abstain, Be faithful, Condomise. We regret the fact that Jacob Zuma broke these rules and we agree with Judge Willem van der Merwe that "It is totally unacceptable that a man should have unprotected sex with a person other than his regular partner and definitely not with a person who, to his knowledge, is HIV-positive". COSATU however fully accepts JacobZuma's apology and his admission that he "should have been more cautious and moreresponsible".We applaud his commitment to join the war against Aids, a pandemic that affects one inseven adults in South Africa and threatens the lives of countless thousands unless we uniteto defeat it, and we look forward to campaigning together with him to win this war against HIV/AIDS." 
 
 
 As for talk about “an abusive power relationship” we believe Duarte should not insult our 
intellect and memory. Duarte was forced to vacate the position of MEC for Safety andSecurity of the Gauteng Government in 1998 over allegations of driving an official
government car without a driver’s licence; failure to report an accident on time; unauthorised
payment of an air ticket for a non-governmental person; employing consultants withoutproperly checking their qualifications; and general accusations of corruption andmismanagement, among others.The 1998 Moerane Commission found that while acting as Gauteng Safety and SecurityMEC, Duarte had been guilty of mismanagement and maladministration, and that she hadabused state funds by buying oversees air tickets for a friend, had grossly overpaid anunqualified administrative assistant, and had used a state vehicle even though she had
never even obtained a driver’s licence. Her assistants then tried to cover up an accident she
had while driving the vehicle.The gentleman whom she was accused of having bought unauthorised air tickets to Portugalwas widely rumoured to be her lover, at the time. Are we to conclude from this, without first
hearing first hand from Jessie, that she too engineered “an abusive relationship” for herself?
We think not.History is littered with instances where sex was used as a tool to defeat political opponents. Ask Catholic Bishop of Harare, Pius Ncube, for proof! What is crucial here is the exploitationof a sex scandal for political purposes, especially in instances in which one party openlyapologises for infidelity, as Vavi has done.Selective morality and gender activism in some instances when the person that is thesubject of scandalous behaviour is not from my faction cannot be tolerated in a society thathas been subjected to the brutality of colonialism, apartheid and patriarchy. In any casemorality is not neutral nor is it devoid from class, cultural and religious underpinnings.We reject with the contempt it deserves the portrayal of woman, whatever their position, asmindless morons incapable of moral judgement when confronted with power, and thusdeserving to be adjudged innocent in all sexual allegations, including rape. We hold as afundamental tenant of any civilised society the presumption of innocence until proven guilty,even as we hold all law to be class based.More than anything else, Je
ssie Duarte’s column confirms to us the exploitation for political
purposes of the allegations of sexual impropriety by Vavi. Duarte has a bone to grind withVavi, for her party. And for this, she is shamelessly willing to see him crucified even for anoffence he has not been found guilty of. As for the serious criminal allegations she makes against Vavi, we leave it to Vavi to decidehow to deal with her.IRVIN JIM
GENERAL SECRETARY
 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->