Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Perry Wrong to Say Texas’ Equal Pay Act Duplicates Federal Law

Perry Wrong to Say Texas’ Equal Pay Act Duplicates Federal Law

Ratings: (0)|Views: 5,486|Likes:
Published by ProgressTX
A memo that describes why Texas Governor Rick Perry is wrong to say Texas’ Equal Pay Act duplicates federal law.
A memo that describes why Texas Governor Rick Perry is wrong to say Texas’ Equal Pay Act duplicates federal law.

More info:

Published by: ProgressTX on Aug 06, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/24/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
Perry Wrong to Say
Texas’ Equal Pay Act Duplicate
s Federal Law
On Friday June 14
th
,
Governor Rick Perry vetoed House Bill 950. The bill related to “
unlawfulemployment practices regarding discrimination in payment of compensation.
i
Governor
Perry’s veto statement for
HB 950 read as follows
ii
:Texas' commitment to smart regulations and fair courts is a large part of why wecontinue to lead the nation in job creation. House Bill 950 duplicates federal law,which already allows employees who feel they have been discriminated againstthrough compensation to file a claim with the U.S. Equal EmploymentOpportunity Commission.
The statement that “House Bill 950 duplicates federal law”
is inaccurate. Here is why:
1.
 
HB 950 makes changes to the Texas Labor Code, while the Lilly Ledbetter actamended the United States Civil Rights Act, over which the state of Texas hasno jurisdiction.
HB 950 amended Section 21 of the Texas Labor Code.
iii
S.181 - Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009
was an act “
To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination inEmployment Act of 1967, and to modify the operation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
.”
iv
 The two laws are not duplicates because they apply to state and federal laws, respectively, anddifferent areas of code in each respective body of law.
2.
 
Multiple Texas courts have ruled that in order for the Lilly Ledbetter Act toapply to state cases, the Texas Legislature must take action.
In TARRANT REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT v. VILLANUEVA, the Fort Worth Court of Appeals of Texas clearly stated that the Texas Legislature must take action to have the federal law apply tostate cases
 –
and noted that prior legislatures have codified federal law into state law.From the ruling (emphasis added):
v
 While it is true that the "general purposes" of Chapter 21 are to "provide for theexecution of the policies of Title VII... and its subsequent amendments,"
nothing in theplain language of section 21.001 states that the statute automatically incorporatesTitle VII's subsequent amendments into itself 
 

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->