A former Contra Costa County Sheriff is seeking a restraining order to keep pension information from the public. It is unlikely she will prevail - nor should she. Just like salary information for public employees is widely available those in the $100,000 Pension Club will soon be revealed.
Original Title
Irwin v Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association
A former Contra Costa County Sheriff is seeking a restraining order to keep pension information from the public. It is unlikely she will prevail - nor should she. Just like salary information for public employees is widely available those in the $100,000 Pension Club will soon be revealed.
A former Contra Costa County Sheriff is seeking a restraining order to keep pension information from the public. It is unlikely she will prevail - nor should she. Just like salary information for public employees is widely available those in the $100,000 Pension Club will soon be revealed.
MATTHEW P. GUICHARD, SBN 107450
WILLIAM L. PORTELLO, SBN 166845
ERIKA PORTILLO, SBN 252025
GUICHARD, TENG & PORTELLO, A-P.C.
Sutter Square
1800 Sutter Street, Suite 730
Concord, California 94520
Telephone: (925) 459-8440
Facsimile: (925) 459-8445
Attomeys for Plaintiff, DONNA IRWIN
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA — UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
DONNA IRWIN ) Case Number:
)
Plaintiff, ) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS “AND
) AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF THE
v. ). APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY
) RESTRAINING ORDER
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ )
RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION and DOES 1-50, ) Code Civ. Proc. §§ 526(a), 527(b)
inclusive, )
>
Defendants. )
)
L
INTRODUCTION
By way of this Motion, Plaintiff and all similarly situated persons, seck a Temporary Restraining
Order against Defendant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
to prevent Defendant from releasing Plaintiff's personal information to the California Foundation for
Fiscal Responsibility. The Motion is brought on the grounds that if the information is released great and
inreparable injury would result to Plaintiff before the matter can be heard on notice as Plaintiff's safety
and privacy rights are at risk.
1
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff DONNA IRWIN, is a retired captain at the Sheriff's office of the County of Contra
Costa. On or about May 5, 2009 Plaintiff received a letter from the CONTRA,COSTA COUNTY
EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION (hereinafter “CCCERA”) regarding a request made
1(GUICHARD, TENG & PORTELLO APG,
Suter Sars
100 Sonar Ss Site 730
Coeor CA 54520-2530
ee a
Sees
=
“elepnne: 625) 439-640,
BRR RRRRS ee Fain,
BRRRRBREBRBS EDS
by the California Foundation for Fiscal Responsibility (hereinafter the “FOUNDATION”) for retirees’
personal information; and CCCERA’s decision to disclose it after May 15, 2009. A copy of that let
is attached as Exhibit “A” to this Memorandum of Points and Authorities.
‘That letter was accompanied by CCCERA's response letter to the FOUNDATION whereby
CCCERA communicated its agreement to disclose “the name and monthly pension foreach retiree and
beneficiary whose gross monthly pension benefit exceeded $8,333 in any month in 2009 where the data
is readily available”. A copy of that letter is attached as Exhibit “B” to this Memorandum of Points and
Authorities
Plaintiff is a retired captain of the Sheriff's office of the County of Contra Costa, who is
currently receiving monthly pension benefits. If Plaintiff's name is released to that organization along
with her monthly pension benefits Plaintiff's safety will be at risk and her privacy rights will violated.
‘The decision of CCCERA to disclose the information, constitutes an unwarranted invasion of
Plaintiff's personal privacy.
mw
DISCUSSION ¥
‘The California Government Code Section 31532 prescribes that
“Swom statements and individual records of members shall be
confidential and shall not be disclosed to anyone except insofar as may
be necessary for the administration of this chapter [the’37 Act] or upon
order of a court of competent jurisdiction, or upon written authorization
by the member”
There is not a court order or written authorization executed by Plaintiff that would otherwise
authorize the disclosure of that information.
Tn 2007, the California Supreme Court issued two rulings whereby it was decided that, the gross
amount of any beneiit or of any refund of a CCCERA contribution due to a member or the beneficiary
is not confidential and may be released upon request made under the Public Records Act, International
Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers v. Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal. 4th 319 and
Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training v. Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal! 4th 278;
Plaintiff does not oppose the release of the requested amounts. However, CCCERA not only
agreed to disclose the gross amount of any benefit or of any refund of a CCCERA’s contribution but to
2ae w
we a au
Sasa Sars
tino sts Sten Sut 720
{Coat CA 945002539
“Teleptuat 935) 459.4640
17
18
GUICRARD, TENG & PORTELLO ALC.
disclose the names of the retirees and the beneficiaries. That decision was made even against CCCERA
own Accessibility of Records Policy which states in Part B that:
“In light of those cases, the CCCERA Board hereby
adopts the following interpretation of Government Code
section 31532 as it pertains to the confidentiality of member
records:
‘Data filed by any member or beneficiary with
CCCERA is confidential, and no individual record shall be
divulged by any official or employee having access to it to any
person other than the memaber to whom the information relates
or his or her authorized representative or the county or
participating agency by which he or she is employed. The
information shall be used by CCCERA for the sole purpose of
carrying into effect the provisions of this part. Any information
that is requested for retirement purposes by any such public
agency shall be treated as confidential by the agency. The gross
amount of any benefit or any refund of an CCCERA
contribution due to a member or beneficiary is not confidential
and may be released upon request to CCCERA
Except as provided by this section, no member's, beneficiary's
or annuitant’s address, home telephone number, or other
personal information shall be released”
In light of the above, CCCERA violated the California Government Code section 31532 and
CCCERA Accessibility of Records Policy by agreeing to release Plaintiff's personal information.
Plaintiff's request is warranted by the referenced provision, and Plaintiff's safety and privacy
rights, Further, the remedy of damages is inatlequate as it involves Plaintiff's privacy rights and safety.
CCCERA should be restrained from releasing the names of the retirees and beneficiaries. Therefore,
Plaintiffand all similar situated members are entitled toa Temporary Restraining Order. That according
to the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 257(b) which provides that:
“A temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction, or both,
may be granted in a class action, in which one or more of the parties sues of
defends for the benefit of numerous parties upon the same grounds as in other
actions, whether or not the class has been certified”.
IV.
CON
USION
In light of the above, Plaintiff and all similarly situated persons are entitled to @ Temporary
Restraining Order to restrain CCCERA fiom releasing personal information of any its members as the
tt
a
John Muir CEO Cal Knight Discusses Proposed Partnership With UCSF Medical Center To Help Form A Regional Health Care Delivery Network in The San Francisco Bay Area