Upload_transparent

The Pelasgian Pre-Greek Substrate and the Linear A

 
 
 
 
 
Value This
Doc
Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 9 43
Words: 3080 13640
Characters: 18758 81678
Lines: 129 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.09 5.99
Words per line: 23.88 21.89
Words per page: 342.22 317.21

Add to your reading list

Flag_red Flag this document

Document Information

563 Reads | 4 Comments

Description

The document summarizes the main information available on the Pelasgian Pre-Greek substrates that are known to have existed in Greece's mainland and islands before the Greek language, a variety of Central Indo-European, became the vernacular. The conclusion is that the Aegean Sea has always been a purely Indo-European area. The document proposes some emendations to the current decipherment of Linear A.

Pdf_16x16 9 Pages


Date Added

05/29/2009

Category
Tags
Groups
Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

or use Facebook Connect

Never_Surrender

Never_Surrender

Questions and Answers from the Author : [Talskubilos wrote]There's a bunch of lies and false expectations on this document: Lie #1: "Greece and Asia Minor, which were previously thought of unknown origin, have revealed ONLY languages with clear and full-fledged Indo-European origin." Truth: There were at least two non-IE languages in ancient Anatolia, Hattic and Hurrian, attested in cuneiform writing. [Arnaud :] irrelevant : these two languages are attested in Eastern Anatolia. [Talskubilos wrote] Lie #2: "There is in fact no place left for any Pelasgo-Etruscomaniac fancies because the area is basically Indo-European." Truth: Mr Fournet forgets the Lemnos' Stele, written in a language similar to Etruscan. [Arnaud :] Totally unproved. [Talskubilos wrote] Lie #3: "The only residual area of unclear status is Crete with a resisting Linear A script so far. Our conviction is that this resistance will not last for ever." Truth: What about the Cypriot syllabary? [Arnaud :] Irrelevant : Cyprus is not Crete. [Talskubilos wrote] Lie #4: "We do not have the necessary expertise nor time to find which of these rare signs would better match which phonetic value. We are convinced that our emendations will bring some light on Pre-Greek inscriptions that will ultimately lead to the full recongnition that Pelasgian Pre-Greek is a third branch of Indo-Euroepan, with Anatolian Indo-European and Non-Anatolian (... [Arnaud] where is the lie ?

05/30/2009
talskubilos

talskubilos

There's a bunch of lies and false expectations on this document: Lie #1: "Greece and Asia Minor, which were previously thought of unknown origin, have revealed ONLY languages with clear and full-fledged Indo-European origin." Truth: There were at least two non-IE languages in ancient Anatolia, Hattic and Hurrian, attested in cuneiform writing. Lie #2: "There is in fact no place left for any Pelasgo-Etruscomaniac fancies because the area is basically Indo-European." Truth: Mr Fournet forgets the Lemnos' Stele, written in a language similar to Etruscan. Lie #3: "The only residual area of unclear status is Crete with a resisting Linear A script so far. Our conviction is that this resistance will not last for ever." Truth: What about the Cypriot syllabary? Lie #4: "We do not have the necessary expertise nor time to find which of these rare signs would better match which phonetic value. We are convinced that our emendations will bring some light on Pre-Greek inscriptions that will ultimately lead to the full recongnition that Pelasgian Pre-Greek is a third branch of Indo-Euroepan, with Anatolian Indo-European and Non-Anatolian (Northern) Indo-European. [...] There is little doubt that the PIE homeland is to be found somewhere around the Aegian Sea." Truth: This is wholesale pseudo-science.

05/30/2009