• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
iMinding the Gap: Time in Neil Gaiman’s
 Neverwhere
and the Hermeneutical InquiryTimothy Andrew John PeoplesThesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Houston in partial fulfillment of therequirements for the degree of Bachelor of ArtsInEnglishMargot Backus, Ph.D., DirectorMaria Gonzalez, Ph.D., English Department ReaderDan Price, Ph.D., Honors College ReaderDefended May 2004Houston, TexasKeywords: British literature, English literature, postmodernism, hermeneutics,contemporary literature, Neil Gaiman, religious studies, timeCopyright 2004 Timothy Andrew John Peoples
 
iiMinding the Gap: Time in Neil Gaiman’s
 Neverwhere
and the Hermeneutical InquiryTim PeoplesABSTRACTI begin this thesis with a discussion of Neil Gaiman’s career and my interaction with hisfirst novel,
 Neverwhere
. I define time in the novel as the succession and interrelatednessof events and divide this definition into two perceptions: immediacy and graduality. Iapply the former to the novel’s separate worlds, which are called London Above andLondon Below. London Above, in the perception of Richard Mayhew, the maincharacter, favors immediacy and rejects graduality. Though his perception is incomplete,the nature of London Above makes him unsuitable for life there. London Below, on theother hand, exhibits both perceptions. Graduality’s influence on the two worlds shows adeparture from Western conceptions of time that makes London Above and LondonBelow a symbiotic that cannot be unified. This symbiosis can be allegorized as thehermeneutical gap. After examining similar concepts in Gaiman’s
Stardust 
and
 American Gods
, I conclude that Gaiman’s writing states that the permanently separatedhermeneutical gap allows humanity to reflect upon itself.
 
iii
Dedication and Acknowledgements
This thesis, being the result of my four years spent in higher education, isdedicated to all the professors who have taught me so much about academics and aboutmyself. I single out the following: Dr. Andrew Hass (who taught me how to criticallyexamine, well, everything), Dr. Margot Backus (whose patience, kindness, and guidanceled to the successful completion of this thesis), Dr. Ross Lence (whose frank criticismopened me to new ideas), Glenn Blake (who respected my vision of the world), Dr. JamesPipkin (who taught me the value of a severely marked-up paper), Dr. Sharon Zivley (whotaught me that economical writing is successful writing), and Dr. Eduardo González (whotaught me the beauty of language and its power to unite). I thank you all.I thank Cecy, my wife, who daily teaches me that miracles do exist, for she is oneof them.I thank my spiritual companions, Lubna Nabi, Rev. John Boll, OP, and all myfriends. “Y’all” help to show me the real reasons behind my efforts.I thank my second and third readers, Dr. Maria González and Dr. Dan Price, fortheir time and insight into my work. I would further like to thank all three of my readersfor allowing me to write a thesis on an author foreign to the canon.I thank the Honors College for the wisdom it and its professors have imparted tome and so many other students.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...