•
Repeal the Bush tax cuts for the highest income earners
http://www.americandailyreview.com/home-features-articles- blog/2009/5/6/hr-676-he Health-Care Now
HR 676 ... eliminating choice, and narrowing all of your options down to the single payer,specifically, the federal government.The federal government, because they will be the ones with the money, will dictate to you what treatments, medicines, and procedures you can or cannot have..... eventually thefederal government will decide that if you are too old and not able to contribute to society anymore, you don’t need that arthritis pain medicine, or that new hip joint, or the medicinethat will keep you from dying from a heart attack. After all, it would be a waste of money tospend precious tax dollars on an individual that no longer contributes to the collectivestate.... Obama’s healthcare plan will add to the staggering deficit being created by thecurrent Administration, kill hundreds of thousands of jobs connected to the privatehealthcare industry, reduce the income level of the medical profession forcing much of thetalent to leave the industry or to not enter the industry in the first place, increase the waiting time for care, and put your health matters into the hands of federal bureaucrats with only cutting the costs of the programs in mind.Healthcare costs will swell, quality of care will drop, and the economic stability of thefederal government will weaken. The federal government cannot run, or heavily regulate, asystem like this efficiently, and the hopes of turning it around once they realize it is anabysmal failure will be slim to none because the private industry will be destroyed by then.
In addition,
the passage of HR 676 is listed as part of the Communist Platform 2.8 EnactHR 676, US National Health Insurance Act, single payer. on its web site American Thinkerhttp://www.americanthinker.com/2009/03/bingo_call_it_communism_1.htmlFrom the
the Editor-in-Chief of Health Management Technology Magazine
http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_676.html
I’m the Editor-in-Chief of Health Management Technology Magazine(www.healthmgttech.com) and I’m simply a concerned citizen, like you, who thinks noindustry is EVER improved by big government, it just becomes more expensive, rationed and less available. Numerous examples exist around the world to support my belief. Mystrong desire is for no one to go without adequate healthcare, but allowing thegovernment to usurp yet another private industry is not the answer. Incidentally, thehealthcare “solution” H.R. 676 proposes is being tried on a smaller scale right now in Massachusetts and the result has been predictable — more expensive, rationed and lessavailable — just like Canada, which is adopting privatization to save its healthcaresystem. Government healthcare is not the answer anywhere that it’s tried, in America or throughout the world.
www.healthmgttech.comMichael McBride
Add a Comment