Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Garcia: Order in re Culkin Hearing

Garcia: Order in re Culkin Hearing

Ratings: (0)|Views: 54 |Likes:
Published by Tony Ortega
Church of Scientology motion denied, Brian Culkin will not be deposed before an October 3 hearing in Garcia federal fraud lawsuit
Church of Scientology motion denied, Brian Culkin will not be deposed before an October 3 hearing in Garcia federal fraud lawsuit

More info:

Categories:Business/Law
Published by: Tony Ortega on Aug 13, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/20/2013

pdf

text

original

 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDATAMPA DIVISION LUIS A. GARCIA SAZ, et al.,Plaintiffs,v. Case No. 8:13-cv-220-T-27TBMCHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGYRELIGIOUS TRUST, et al.,Defendants./O R D E R 
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’
Motion for Leave to TakeDeposition of Witness Brian Culkin
(Doc. 53), and Plaintiffs’ response in opposition (Docs.56, 65). By their Motion, Defendants seek to take the deposition
de bene esse
of Brian
1
Culkin in anticipation of the Court’s hearing on Defendant’s motion to disqualify Plaintiffs’counsel on October 3, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiffs do not oppose the deposition, but theycontest certain representations by Defendants and disagree on the Defendants’ proposedrestrictions on the conduct of the same. A telephone hearing was held on August 12, 2013.Counsel for the parties, as well as Mr. Culkin and his attorney, Ray Jeffrey, participated in theconversation.Plaintiffs’ “objection” (Doc. 56) was responded to by Defendants’ Opposition (Doc.
1
58). Both were previously terminated. Counsel are reminded that Local Rule 3.01 anticipatesthat there be a “motion,” and, if the motion is opposed, a “response.” Further, under LocalRule 3.01(c), “[n]o party shall file any reply or further memorandum directed to [a] motion or response . . . unless the Court grants leave.”
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 68 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1607

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->