3 After hearing argument, which included an application to strike out certain parts of thereplying affidavit of the appellant, the Court
made the following order:“That in respect of respondent’s application to strike out:A (1) The following portions, paragraphs and annexure of applicant’sreplying affidavit are struck out:Paragraphs 5.3, 5.4 with annexure WM17, 5.5, 5.6,9.2.2 and35.1.1.(2)
Save for the allegations in paragraph 2(e) and (f) of respondent’s application to strike out, those portions andparagraphs in applicant’s replying affidavit set out inparagraphs 2(a) to (p) of respondent’s application to strike out,are struck out.(3)
The portions and paragraphs of applicant’s replying affidavitset out in paragraph 3(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of respondent’sapplication to strike out are struck out.B Applicant shall pay the costs of the application to strike out. For thebenefit of the taxing master the argument in respect of the applicationtook about ten (10) minutes.