13-03-28 in Re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in The Haifa Magistrate Court - Decision by Judge Alon, Asking For Adding All Conservatee's Children To The Case, and For Social Worker Review
In a court with no lawfully appointed Chief Clerk:
Litigation is conducted, where no law of the State of Israel is indicated as the foundation for the litigation.
Requests, which are filed by attorney in court are often not served on the purported “Respondent”, and the “Respondent” is not permitted to inspect them, even after repeated requests. Neither is the “Respondent” permitted to inspect the list of requests.
Some of the Court's decision are not served on the purported “Respondent”, and the “Respondent” is not permitted to inspect them, even after repeated requests. Neither is the “Respondent” permitted to inspect the list of decisions.
All judicial records are served unsigned by the judicial authority and are accompanied by an unsigned authentication letter by an unnamed “Clerk”,
On-its-face invalid November 23, 2010 “Decree Appointing a Conservator” by Presiding Judge Ehud Rekem is likely to be deemed by most experts a sham/simulated judicial record (missing reference to the authorizing law, showing no consecutive, serial number for the decree, and the “Chief Clerk” refuses to certify it “True Copy of the Original”).
Index of All Cases and Calendar of the Court entries were falsified by a judge, splitting a matter into two court file numbers, then purporting to conduct a hearing on a “Request” listed under one court file number, under a Calendar entry of the other court file number...
Sham/simulated March 17, 2013 Decision was falsely served on the Dr Zernik, but later, an unauthorized court employee issued a letter, claiming tat it was an invalid judicial record...
Through the service and presentation of on-their-face invalid judicial records, an individual is asked to appear in a court in a civil matter, while no record, issued by the court or others indicates, what section of the code he was purportedly sued under, and where he is denied access to court records in the very same court file.
A reasonable person, upon review of the records, would likely conclude that the Haifa Magistrate Court and others were and are engaged in the conduct of sham/simulated litigation in this matter, in violation of key articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – ratified international law.
Such conduct is deemed in criminological terms “state organized crime”, since it involves organized white-collar crimes by judges, clerks, and attorneys on behalf of state authorities...
Original Title
13-03-28 In re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Decision by Judge Alon, asking for adding all Conservatee's children to the case, and for Social Worker review
In a court with no lawfully appointed Chief Clerk:
Litigation is conducted, where no law of the State of Israel is indicated as the foundation for the litigation.
Requests, which are filed by attorney in court are often not served on the purported “Respondent”, and the “Respondent” is not permitted to inspect them, even after repeated requests. Neither is the “Respondent” permitted to inspect the list of requests.
Some of the Court's decision are not served on the purported “Respondent”, and the “Respondent” is not permitted to inspect them, even after repeated requests. Neither is the “Respondent” permitted to inspect the list of decisions.
All judicial records are served unsigned by the judicial authority and are accompanied by an unsigned authentication letter by an unnamed “Clerk”,
On-its-face invalid November 23, 2010 “Decree Appointing a Conservator” by Presiding Judge Ehud Rekem is likely to be deemed by most experts a sham/simulated judicial record (missing reference to the authorizing law, showing no consecutive, serial number for the decree, and the “Chief Clerk” refuses to certify it “True Copy of the Original”).
Index of All Cases and Calendar of the Court entries were falsified by a judge, splitting a matter into two court file numbers, then purporting to conduct a hearing on a “Request” listed under one court file number, under a Calendar entry of the other court file number...
Sham/simulated March 17, 2013 Decision was falsely served on the Dr Zernik, but later, an unauthorized court employee issued a letter, claiming tat it was an invalid judicial record...
Through the service and presentation of on-their-face invalid judicial records, an individual is asked to appear in a court in a civil matter, while no record, issued by the court or others indicates, what section of the code he was purportedly sued under, and where he is denied access to court records in the very same court file.
A reasonable person, upon review of the records, would likely conclude that the Haifa Magistrate Court and others were and are engaged in the conduct of sham/simulated litigation in this matter, in violation of key articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – ratified international law.
Such conduct is deemed in criminological terms “state organized crime”, since it involves organized white-collar crimes by judges, clerks, and attorneys on behalf of state authorities...
13-03-28 in Re: RSZ (25607-03-13) in The Haifa Magistrate Court - Decision by Judge Alon, Asking For Adding All Conservatee's Children To The Case, and For Social Worker Review
In a court with no lawfully appointed Chief Clerk:
Litigation is conducted, where no law of the State of Israel is indicated as the foundation for the litigation.
Requests, which are filed by attorney in court are often not served on the purported “Respondent”, and the “Respondent” is not permitted to inspect them, even after repeated requests. Neither is the “Respondent” permitted to inspect the list of requests.
Some of the Court's decision are not served on the purported “Respondent”, and the “Respondent” is not permitted to inspect them, even after repeated requests. Neither is the “Respondent” permitted to inspect the list of decisions.
All judicial records are served unsigned by the judicial authority and are accompanied by an unsigned authentication letter by an unnamed “Clerk”,
On-its-face invalid November 23, 2010 “Decree Appointing a Conservator” by Presiding Judge Ehud Rekem is likely to be deemed by most experts a sham/simulated judicial record (missing reference to the authorizing law, showing no consecutive, serial number for the decree, and the “Chief Clerk” refuses to certify it “True Copy of the Original”).
Index of All Cases and Calendar of the Court entries were falsified by a judge, splitting a matter into two court file numbers, then purporting to conduct a hearing on a “Request” listed under one court file number, under a Calendar entry of the other court file number...
Sham/simulated March 17, 2013 Decision was falsely served on the Dr Zernik, but later, an unauthorized court employee issued a letter, claiming tat it was an invalid judicial record...
Through the service and presentation of on-their-face invalid judicial records, an individual is asked to appear in a court in a civil matter, while no record, issued by the court or others indicates, what section of the code he was purportedly sued under, and where he is denied access to court records in the very same court file.
A reasonable person, upon review of the records, would likely conclude that the Haifa Magistrate Court and others were and are engaged in the conduct of sham/simulated litigation in this matter, in violation of key articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – ratified international law.
Such conduct is deemed in criminological terms “state organized crime”, since it involves organized white-collar crimes by judges, clerks, and attorneys on behalf of state authorities...
2012-05-31 Ombudsman of the Judiciary decision 88/12/Tel-Aviv District in the Judge Varda Alshech "Fabricated Protocols" affair // החלטת נציב תלונות הציבור על השופטים 88/12/מחוזי תל-אביב בפרשת "הפרוטוקולים המפוברקים" של השופטת ורדה אלשייך
2018-11-08 Zernik, J. "Cyber & Law - Israel as a case study - presentation in Univ of Goettingen law school colloquium // סייבר ומשפט - ישראל כמקרה בוחן - מצגת בקולוקוויום בבי"ס למשפטים, אוניברסיטת גטינגן, גרמניה
2018-02-19 Central Election Committee: FOIA request (No 2/0219/18) - Supreme Court Justices, protocols, appointments // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע (מס’ 2/0219/18) לגבי שופטי בית המשפט העליון, פרוטוקולים, מינויים
0000-00-00 State of Israel v Ariel, Klass and Zernik (36318-08-19) Public Defender’s office false response on inquiry - undated, no reference number, no case number // מ"י נ אריאל קלס וצרניק (36318-08-19) - תשובה שקרית על פניה לסנגוריה הציבורית - ללא תאריך, ללא מספר אסמכתה, ללא מספר תיק
2018-05-24 Refusal to accept repeat request to Central Election Committee Chair, Justice Hanan Melcer’s response on inquiry, asking him to perform his reporting duties// סירוב לקבל בקשה חוזרת לתשובת יו"ר ועדת הבחירות המרכזית, שופט בית המשפט העליון חנן מלצר על בקשה למילוי חובת הדיווח
2017-11-05 Inquiry with Shin-Bet Head Nadav Argaman – false and misleading Ministry of Interior FOIA response, in re: computerization of the election system // פנייה לראש השב"כ נדב ארגמן בעניין מחשוב מערכת הבחירות – תשובה שקרית ומטעה של משרד הפנים על בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע
2017-09-06 Central Election Committee: Request for Chairman, Justice Hanan Melcer to perform his duties and ascertain compliance with FOIA (sent to the Supreme Court) // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה לשופט בית המשפט העליון, יו”ר הוועדה חנן מלצר למלא את תפקידו ולוודא שהוועדה מקיימת את חוק חופש המידע (נשלח לבית המשפט העליון)
2017-10-22 Inquiry with Shin-Bet Head Nadav Argaman – failure of the Ministry of Interior to comply with FOIA, in re: computerization of the election system // פנייה לראש השב"כ נדב ארגמן בעניין מחשוב מערכת הבחירות – אי קיום חוק חופש המידע על ידי משרד הפנים
2017-09-07 Central Election Committee: Request for Chairman, Justice Hanan Melcer to perform his duties and ascertain compliance with FOIA (sent to the Committee) // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה לשופט בית המשפט העליון, יו”ר הוועדה חנן מלצר למלא את תפקידו ולוודא שהוועדה מקיימת את חוק חופש המידע (נשלח לוועדה)
2017-09-06 National Cyber Security Authority: Inquiry regarding guiding and certification of government IT systems, security standards online publication // הרשות הלאומית להגנת הסייבר: פנייה לגבי הנחיה ואישור מערכות מידע ממשלתיות, פרסום ברשת בעניין תקני אבטחת מערכות מידע
2017-10-22 Request for compliance with FOIA by Ministry of Interior, in re: Public Committee for Review of Computerization of the Election System // בקשה לקיום הוראות חוק חופש המידע על ידי משרד הפנים בנוגע לוועדה לבחינת מחשוב מערכת הבחירות
2017-10-01 Zernik v State of Israel et al (7631/17) – criminal appeal – in the Supreme Court – Notice of Appeal and Appeal // צרניק נ מדינת ישראל ואח' (7631/17) – ערעור פלילי – בבית המשפט העליון – הודעת ערעור וערעור
2017-09-12 Ministry of Interior: Freedom of Information Request (No ) regarding IT systems of the Central Election Committee and Ombudsman’s reports // משרד הפנים: בקשה (מס’ )על פי חוק חופש המידע לגבי מחשוב ועדת הבחירות המרכזית ודוחות מבקר המדינה
2017-09-12 Central Election Committee: Freedom of Information Request (No ) regarding IT systems of the Central Election Committee and Ombudsman’s reports // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה (מס’ ) על פי חוק חופש המידע לגבי מחשוב ועדת הבחירות המרכזית ודוחות מבקר המדינה
2017-09-05 FOIA Request (-2017) on Ministry of Justice, in re: Authority to sign decisions of Ombudsman of the Judiciary // בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע (-2017) למשרד המשפטים לגבי סמכות חתימה על החלטות נציב תלונות הציבור על השופטים
2017-09-03 Central Election Committee: Freedom of Information Request regarding IT systems of the Central Election Committee – protocols of the Tender Committee ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע לגבי מחשוב ועדת הבחירות המרכזית - פרוטוקולים של ועדת המכרזים