psychological basis of it, and our suggestions for initiating a systematic process for improving our lot.
How institutions tend to inhibit human development
Over the last nine thousand years, since tribal peoples began to settle in villages and towns, leadersarose to defend and administer territory, control trade and collect taxes. They became chiefs, warrior kings, pharaohs, emperors, etc. and their relatives and descendants often formed an aristocracywhich in some cases in some cultures lasted hundreds of years.[7]Whenever these kings created periods of comparative stability, other power structures that couldsatisfy the innate human need for status proliferated in all areas of human activity: religion, law,war, crafts, business, education, health etc. This process was as inevitable as ice crystals formingwhen the temperature drops. As populations rapidly grew, the people at the top of each hierarchydevised laws and systems to help themselves maintain power and counter the tendency towardscomplete anarchy. The most thoughtful of leaders managed to minimise the excesses of cruel andgreedy behaviour and harness human creativity and cooperation for the greater good. (As one wouldexpect, the great intellectual discoveries and achievements of earlier civilisations mostly occurredduring periods of relative order and tranquillity because it is difficult to reflect, think and planconstructively when one is hungry, sick or frightened and has to concentrate on survival. But it hasalso been observed that great technological progress is made in times of war and disaster — necessity being the mother of invention.)As cultures expanded, the possibilities enabling yet more people to satisfy their own need toexercise power grew too — every king needed an army, and every army needed a hierarchy to runit.The more complex a kingdom's administration became, the more its functions divided andspecialised, into tax collection and road building, for example. These functions also generated their own power systems and the chance to gain status and exercise influence both at home and far away.As trade flourished, merchant princes and guilds associated with building, crafts and manufacturedgoods arose too, each with their own hierarchy based on skills, wealth and patronage.The religious life of the people, driven by our need to answer questions about the meaning of lifeand our place in the world and the cosmic order, provided further opportunities for power structuresto develop and priesthoods did not hold back from seizing them. As cultures became more complex,the animism and shamanism of tribal people were superseded and more formally organisedreligions and philosophies developed like a veneer over the primitive magical forms of thinking thatstill survived. (Much modern behaviour is still governed by primitive beliefs, superstition, magicalthinking and animal reactions.[8]) Most of us, and especially representatives of institutions, like bishops, judges and politicians, pontificate about civilised behaviour — saying "this is civilised"and "that's uncivilised" — but such judgments are not as secure as we all pretend. Even the most'civilised' among us have, in certain contexts, been shown to behave like primitives.[9]For a long time the churches, monarchy, parliamentary institutions, and the legal and educationalinstitutions of this country were a source of pride. People trusted them, boasted about them — untilrecently a politician's stock-in-trade phrase, when an institution was found wanting, was to say that,"It may not be perfect but our such-and-such is the envy of the world". This doesn't wash any more.Trust in institutions, trust that is earned and deserved, the cement that binds civilised peopletogether, has almost completely crumbled away.[10]Any organisation set up for a useful purpose may quickly become an institution and lose touch withits proper function. Since the foundation of city-states, people with authority have abused the powers invested in them — every office at every level is vulnerable to corruption, to 'jobs-worths'and to takeover by petty tyrants.[11]
Leave a Comment