Wrestling with Sanctification
3 |
Page
b.
Expanded:i.
Those of the “higher life”, “perfectionist” camp would find it impossible toharmonize their view of sanctification with Paul’s experience if it is a post
-conversion experience!ii.
Reformed view is that Paul is speaking of his own personal struggle with sin!And that this is an accurate description
of every saint’s struggle with indwelling
sin!c.
Defended: (Note: From Romans, an Interpretive Outline, Steele and Curtis, pp 126-130)i.
Use of the present tense: (7:14-22)I am carnal, sold under sin.
15
For what I am doing, I do not understand.For what I will to do, that I do not practice; but what I hate, that I do.
16
If, then, I do what I will not to do, I agree with the law that
it is
good.
17
But now,
it is
no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me.
18
For Iknow that in me (that is, in my flesh) nothing good dwells; for to will ispresent with me, but
how
to perform what is good I do not find.
19
Forthe good that I will
to do,
I do not do; but the evil I will not
to do,
that Ipractice.
20
Now if I do what I will not
to do,
it is no longer I who do it,but sin that dwells in me.
21
I find then a law, that evil is present withme, the one who wills to do good.
22
For I delight in the law of Godaccording to the inward man.ii.
Paul acknowledges Jesus as Lord and Savior in this section1.
Romans 7:24-25,
“O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from
this body of death?
25
I thank God
—
through Jesus Christ our Lord
!”
2.
Cf I Corinthians 12:3, “no one can say that Jesus is Lord except by theHoly Spirit”
iii.
Paul’s expression of attitudes towards God’s law in
this section1.
22, “I delight in the law of God according to the inward man”
2.
25, “with the mind I myself serve the law of God”
iv.
The structure of Paul’s argument in Romans
–
Hodge (
Extra .. not in class
!)
His great object in the first eight chapters, is to show that the whole work of the sinner's salvation, his justification and sanctification, are not of the law,but of grace; that legal obedience can never secure the one, nor legal effortsthe other
. Accordingly, in the first five chapters, he shows that we are justifiedby faith, without the works of the law; in the sixth, that this doctrine of gratuitous justification, instead of leading to licentiousness, presents the onlycertain and effectual means of sanctification. In the beginning of the seventhchapter, he shows that the believer is really thus free from the law, and is nowunder grace; and that while under the law he brought forth fruit unto sin, butbeing under grace, he now brings forth fruit unto God. The question here arises,Why is the holy, just, and good law thus impotent? Is it because it is evil? Far
Leave a Comment