ONATEET AL.
Academic Psychiatry, 32:6, November-December 2008
http://ap.psychiatryonline.org
519
county psychiatry patients who met primary care eligibility
criteria could receive their medical care from a \ufb01rst-year
psychiatry resident and a jointly trained internist/psychia-
trist or family medicine/psychiatrist in the county\u2019s Primary
Care Clinic. With the support and active collaboration of
the Director of Primary Care for Sacramento County, the
pilot project was organized.
During 2 of their 4 months in internal medicine, psy-
chiatry residents provide medical care to eligible patients
in the Primary Care Clinic. Supervision is provided by
three jointly trained internists/psychiatrists and one fam-
ily medicine/psychiatrist. In addition, the director of the
program (JO) developed a consultation program county-
wide in which physicians who work at any of the four
county-operated clinics, homeless intervention programs,
or other intensive service programs could refer psychi-
atric patients who had no insurance and met other eligi-
bility criteria to the Primary Care Clinic to have medical
evaluations.
There is an extensive literature about the increased rates
of medical illness in psychiatric patients (1). This is espe-
cially true for psychiatric patients with chronic and severe
mental disorders (2). Consequently, we thought that es-
tablishing such a referral program could considerably re-
duce the medical comorbidity of psychiatric patients re-
ceiving care in Sacramento County. Another pressing
problem is that psychiatric disorders in medical patients
are often going unrecognized by primary care physicians
(3\u20135). An additional purpose of this combined service
was to develop a collaborative consultation arrangement
with primary care physicians so that they could refer pa-
tients with psychiatric disorders for evaluation and treat-
ment (6\u20138).
An educational program was also established in which
the jointly trained faculty give bimonthly presentations to
county primary care physicians, internal medicine residents,
medical students, and rotating psychiatry residents on the
assessment and management of common psychiatric prob-
lems encountered in the primary care or medical setting.
This education program has been quite successful. In ad-
dition to the primary care attendings, internal medicine res-
idents who rotate through the clinic also attend these ses-
sions.
Another educational program was recently established
in which the jointly trained attendings go out to the psy-
chiatry clinics bimonthly and provide educational pro-
grams on common medical problems that the psychiatry
attendings will encounter in their patients. This aspect of
the educational programhas just been established.
Results
For the 2005\u20132006 academic year, the attendings and
residents conducted 550 psychiatric consultations, both
formal and informal, for the primary care attendings. Fur-
thermore, during 2005\u20132006, 1,255 uninsured patients
from the county psychiatry clinics, substance abuse treat-
ment centers, jail, and community were seen by combined
faculty and psychiatry residents, with the majority being
treated for both psychiatric and medical disorders. In ad-
dition, we held six conferences for primary care physicians
addressing common psychiatric issues such as hepatitis C
in the dual-diagnosis patient population, anxiety disorders,
geriatric psychiatry, the mental status examination in the
primary care setting, psychosomatic disorders, and depres-
sion treatment in the primary care setting.
During the \ufb01rst year, the most common medical condi-
tions encountered in psychiatric patients were diabetes type
1 and 2, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, coronary heart
disease, chronic renal insuf\ufb01ciency, hypothyroidism, hepa-
titis C, gastroesophageal re\ufb02ux disease, seizure disorders,
migraine headaches, and community-acquired methicillin-
resistantStaphylococcus aureus skin infections.
The psychiatry residents\u2019 responses to this new program
were quite enthusiastic. A review of evaluations by resi-
dents after completing the rotation from the UC Davis
performance analysis report showed that the rating of su-
pervision offered through the service had an average score
of 4.29 out of 5 (n\ue0017, SD\ue0010.76), and that the overall
rating of training site and rotation had an average score of
4.43 out of 5 (n\ue0017, SD\ue0010.53).
Here are representative comments on the rotation from
the residents:
\u201cThe diversity of the patient population, the quality of the
attendings and their teaching, and the general work envi-
ronment made for one of the best atmospheres for learning
medicine and primary care that I could hope for. This ro-
tation is not simply a less painful way to satisfy our board
requirements for medicine. It is a shining example of the
importance of maintaining a strong base of medical knowl-
edge and the inextricable interface between medical illness
and psychiatric illness.\u201d
\u201cGreat site to learn [from] medicine-interested, enthusiastic
faculty who seemed to care about our learning medicine as
much as . . . noncombined, medicine faculty . . . Enjoyed
having combined faculty teach us medicine.\u201d
The residents found the rotation, compared with other
medicine rotations, to provide both training and clinical
Leave a Comment