Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Deuxième demande d'information de la Ville de Toronto à Enbridge

Deuxième demande d'information de la Ville de Toronto à Enbridge

Ratings: (0)|Views: 2,721|Likes:
Published by Radio-Canada

More info:

Published by: Radio-Canada on Aug 25, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/26/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Enbridge Pipelines Inc. (Enbridge)Line 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion Project (Project)Application under section 58 (Application) of the
 National Energy Board Act
 
OH-002-2013City of Toronto ("Toronto")Information Request No. 2 to Enbridge ResponseFile OF-Fac-Oil-E101-2012-10 02
NOTE:This Information Request was prepared with input from staff of other municipalities sharing similar concerns. Specifically, aliaison group was established and met regularly regarding the Application. The liaison group was attended by staff from theTown of Ajax, the City of Burlington, the City of Hamilton, the City of Kingston, the City of Mississauga, the City of Toronto,and other municipal groups.NOTE:For continuity, Information Request No. 2 has used the same numbering system as was in place for Information Request No. 1(eg. IR 1 1.2.b follow up request is called IR 2 2.2.b)
 
Enbridge Pipelines Inc.Line 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion ProjectApplication under section 58 of the
 National Energy Board Act 
 OH-002-2013Information Request of Toronto No. 2 To Enbridge ResponseFile OF-Fac-Oil-E101-2012-10 02Dated 09 Jul 2013Page 2 of 37
CITY OF TORONTO IR 1Request:
ENBRIDGE RESPONSE TO TORONTO IR 1
Response:CITY OF TORONTO IR 2Request:
1.2
System Operations
Please provide the following:
b)
 
Enbridge’s operating requirementsapplicable to Line 9.
c)
 
Enbridge’s operating and maintenance procedures applicable toLine 9.
d)
 
Enbridge’s preventative maintenance program applicable to Line 9.
1.2b - d)
In constructing and operating theProject, Enbridge will follow all applicableinternal documents and standards,including: Enbridge Engineering DesignStandards; Enbridge Operations and Maintenance Manuals (formerly referred toas Operating and Maintenance Procedures);the Environmental Guidelines for Construction; various other Control Centreand Integrity plans and procedures; and theLine 9 Rules and Regulations Tariff. TheEngineering Design Standards and Operations and Maintenance Manuals have been filed confidentially with the NEB. Aredacted copy of Book 1 was filed asAttachment to OPLA IR 1.9 in the Line 9Reversal Phase I proceeding. Please seeAttachment 1 to response to Ontario IR 1.44b.v for a redacted copy of Book 7.These redactions remove irrelevantinformation, such as: information related toU.S. operations; personal information; and information which if released, on its own or in conjunction with other information, could  pose a security risk or safety hazard. Pleasesee Attachment 1 NEB IR 1.14 for the
2.2b – d)
refers to a redacted version of Book 1filed in the Phase 1 part of the Line 9application, OPLA 1R 1.9; however, thatanswer on p. 10 of 26 simply objects to thefiling on the ground of confidentiality. Please provide a copy or a link or advise if a copy was provided elsewhere.
 
Enbridge Pipelines Inc.Line 9B Reversal and Line 9 Capacity Expansion ProjectApplication under section 58 of the
 National Energy Board Act 
 OH-002-2013Information Request of Toronto No. 2 To Enbridge ResponseFile OF-Fac-Oil-E101-2012-10 02Dated 09 Jul 2013Page 3 of 37
CITY OF TORONTO IR 1Request:
ENBRIDGE RESPONSE TO TORONTO IR 1
Response:CITY OF TORONTO IR 2Request:
Environmental Guidelines for Construction(2012).The proposed Line 9 Rules and Regulations Tariff is included in Attachment10 to the Application for approval by the NEB
1.3
 Pipeline Integrity
 
d)
 
Enbridge’s opinion as to the accuracyof the statement that there were “
onlythree spills resulting from internalcorrosion for pipelines shippingbitumen and blends of bitumenbetween 1990 and 2005 (and onlyeight from 1975 to 2010).”
 
1.3d)
Enbridge objects to the request as theinformation sought is not relevant to theissues in this proceeding.
2.3d)
If this information is not relevant to theissues, why did Enbridge file it in Tab 4(f) of the application?
1.4
 Pipeline Integrity and DilBit, SynBit, and DilSynBit Research
Please provide the following:
c)
Enbridge's concerns on the validity of the CanMetMATERIALS rotating cagetests and the results presented in theSummary of the Comparison Reportdue to the tests being performed atambient temperature and pressureconditions rather than pipeline
1.4c)
Enbridge does not question the validity of the findings by CanMetMATERIALS.Enbridge recognizes that there arechallenges inherent in bringing anyindustrial process into the laboratory, and that extraordinary results from one set of conditions to another must be donecautiously. However, trends at ambienttemperature and pressure can be expected to be similar to trends observed if the testing
2.4c)
Please provide the basis, and examples,where heavy crude and DilBit corrosivityresearch have shown that “
trends at ambient temperature and pressure can be expected to besimilar to trends observed if the testing were all performed at elevated pressures and temperatures
” as stated in the response.
f)
Tables 7.2.1 through 7.2.3 provide Maximumand Minimum Product Properties of Light,

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->