Late November or early December Tip was once again asked to move the vehicles. He andanother officer (Brannen) went to move the vehicles. His initial understanding was that he was tofind a place to hide the vehicles (not in a County storage facility). However, Karen Andersonstepped in and said they were tired of hiding the vehicles and to return them to the fleet.Tip noted that the Mercedes was a CLS500, and the Range Rover was a basic model. He added"2 of the nicest cars in the fleet. No, the best cars in the fleet."When McKinney cross-examined Tip Green he asked if Admin Vehicles were also assigned to theCEO's office. Tip said Yes. McKinney asked if Kimbrough had one and if Kimbrough was acivilian. Tip said Yes to both questions.When questioned by McKinney on a possible reason why Bolton wouldn't want cars in his costceneter, perhaps for security reasons and the Open Records Act (that someone might be able toget a list of Bolton's vehicles). Tip stated No.
Don Frank:
Don Frank became involved in Keisha Williams termination only because Bolton called him andasked him to talk to Karen Anderson and tell her not to terminated KW before Bolton got back intotown. Frank followed Bolton's orders to talk to KA, but that was the extent of his involvement.Frank said he did not follow up with Bolton after talking with KA.Frank's testimony on the removal of cars from Bolton's home closely matches Tip's testimonyabove. He said after the cars were at his house for 2 - 3 weeks, he got a call from KA saying hehad been seen driving the cars. He said he had been out of town at a funeral, and also aconference.When asked if he knew if Keisha Williams had police training Frank answered No (with a smile).When asked if it was unusual for the Acting Chief to terminate a director, Frank answered yes, butwhen questioned by the county again later if the CEO had the authority to terminate KW, Franksanswered Yes. They further asked if an order is given should it be carried out. Franks answeredyes.
Travis Sakrison- Deputy Chief Assistant District Attorney:
Sakrison handles Forfeiture law for the county. Sakrison stated the value of the cars was approx: RR $30,000 and the Mercedes $75,000 andhe explained Forfeiture Law. He stated that when a vehicle is distributed the law states thevehicle needs to be used for official law enforcement purpose. When asked "Should the RR andthe Mercedes be used for specific law enforcement purpose with this orider?" Sakrison answered"Yes." When asked upon Cross examination if driving to meetings qualified Sakrison answered "Iguess so." He was asked by the county if having a car at your house to drive around on theweekends is official use. Sakrison answered No. Upon cross examination he was asked byMcKinney "If you are driving to official meetings on the weekend does that qualify as officialuse?" Sakrison answered "That would be different." Sakrison stated that the vehicles were better suited for undercover police work, and that thevehicles did not suit the needs of the DA's office.When asked what he drives Sakrison stated he drove an Audi, but wasn't sure what year. Hesaid it is always in the shop. When asked what car the DA drove, he was not sure. Sakrison talked about Federal Laws in place regarding forfeiture but when questioned said thelaw does not define "official use."
Don Geary - Chief Assistant District Attorney:
When asked if he had knowledge of the RR and the Mercedes Geary stated "Yes. We do all thelegal work for the Police Department and the vehicles are then forfeited back to the department."
Leave a Comment