58_2009!06!11_MOTION to Strike # 36 Taitz-DOFF Opposition to TRO

Embed Doc
Copy Link
Readcast
Collections

CommentGo Back

Download

Z:\Liberi, et al, Taitz, et al, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LISA LIBERI, et al,Plaintiffs,vs.ORLY TAITZ, et al,Defendants.::::::::::Case No.: 09-cv-01898-ECR

ORDER THIS CAUSE

came before the United States District Court Judge, Honorable EduardoC. Robreno on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendant’s Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a LawOffices of Orly Taitz a/k/awww.orlytaitzesq.coma/k/awww.repubx.coma/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc. and Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. “Opposition to Injunction”. Having reviewed theMotion and any Response thereto and for good cause shown, it is hereby

ORDERED

that Defendant’s Orly Taitz, et al. and Defend our Freedoms Foundation,Inc., “Opposition to Injunction” is

STRICKEN from the record

. It is further

ORDER

of thisCourt that Plaintiffs’ Injunction or Restraining Order is hereby

GRANTED

.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: June _____, 2009 _____________________________ Hon. Eduardo C. RobrenoUnited States District Court JudgeFor the Eastern District of PA

Z:\Liberi, et al, Taitz, et al, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike2

Law Offices of:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531Identification No. 09867(610) 825-3134

Attorney for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LISA LIBERI, et al,Plaintiffs,vs.ORLY TAITZ, et al,Defendants.::::::::::Case No.: 09-cv-01898-ECR

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKEDEFENDANT’S, ORLY TAITZ, et al and DEFEND OUR FREEDOMSFOUNDATION, INC. “OPPOSITION TO INJUNCTION”

Plaintiffs’ Lisa Liberi [hereinafter “Liberi”]; Philip J. Berg, Esquire [hereinafter “Berg”],the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg; Evelyn Adams a/k/a Momma E [hereinafter “Adams”]; LisaOstella [hereinafter “Ostella”]; and Go Excel Global by and through their undersigned counsel,Philip J. Berg, Esquire files the within Motion to Strike Defendant’s, Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. OrlyTaitz a/k/a Law Offices of Orly Taitz a/k/awww.orlytaitzesq.coma/k/awww.repubx.coma/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc. [hereinafter “Taitz”] and Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. [hereinafter “DOFF”] “Opposition to Injunction” on the following grounds:

Z:\Liberi, et al, Taitz, et al, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike3

• Taitz and DOFF’s Motion is an improper Motion. Taitz and DOFF fail to supporttheir “Opposition to Injunction” without any type of Statute or supporting Law.• Taitz and DOFF’s Motion fails to give any good cause for granting the requestedrelief;• Taitz and DOFF’s “Opposition to Injunction” should be completely stricken as itis

not

proper; it fails to address any claims in Plaintiffs’ Complaint and/or EmergencyMotion for an Injunction and/or Temporary Restraining Order [TRO] and is nothing morethan conclusions of law; hearsay statements;

immaterial, impertinent, and scandalousstatements and material and is completely irrelevant, impertinent and immaterial to thewithin action; and fails to give any type of legally sufficient defense; Taitz only filed thisnonsense to prejudice the Plaintiffs.• Taitz and DOFF’s illegal, threatening, harassing and dangerous behaviors havecontinued and have escalated. Therefore, Plaintiffs’ Injunction or Restraining Order must be granted.Respectfully submitted,Dated: June 11, 2009 _____________________________ Philip J. Berg, Esquire

Attorney for Plaintiffs’

s/ Philip J. Berg

of 00

Leave a Comment