Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Not Telling, Poems 09-10, edited 2013

Not Telling, Poems 09-10, edited 2013

Ratings: (0)|Views: 117 |Likes:
Published by manuel arturo abreu
^____^
^____^

More info:

Published by: manuel arturo abreu on Aug 27, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/30/2013

pdf

text

original

 
not telling
poems 2009 – 2010
 
edited 2013manuel arturo abreu
 
introduction
1 // winter
 influorescenceelephanta shawldraythe privilege of idlenessaporiahowthe merismapocalipstickthe analogyblue dovedream cowthe cricket
2 // spring
emeraldthe gladeanother infinity ladderthe darker glancethe queen says nothing joiningblanchedapple chapelinside blue hillbackward lemonsthe architect of morningsat fish bridgeredactionabstraction
 
introduction
pdx ~ aug 27 2013 ~ 130am
i had a lot of poems from freshman year of college sitting around.i never did anything with them b/c i thought they were bad poems:lots of abstract imagery, vague foreboding, emotionally bankrupt stuff that stemmed from being in an unrequited love situation with someone.the images 'meant' something to me, but only to me, and for that reasonthe poems were embarrassingly personal in a way that was coded,a way that was afraid of being honest and, like, 'poetically ethical.'so i decided to revisit the poems are if they were raw material.i used whatever phrases i thought sounded good, changed things at liberty.it was a massacre, i loved it. i originally was going to release them as they were,in some sort of gesture toward transparency of writerly process, but decidedit's not worth anyone's time. i'm a much better writer now, the original poemsneeded the scalpel like i need to be murdered by a refugee.the idea was that if i couldn't bear to be honest when i originally wrote the poems,i could edit them without worrying at all about the 'emotional honesty'of the final result re the unrequited love sitch. meaning i was free to dowhatever i wanted, and construct entirely new poetic ontologiesthink of this in light of a 'consistent process of primitive accumulation'not sure if that means anything to anyone, i'll explain that later maybe.anyway while most of the results drastically differ from the source poems(which share names with their respective revised versions)a few remained mostly the same, simply because of my nostalgia.i'm weak like that. the result of this editing process (one sitting, ~7hrs),is, i feel, a more honest framing of my relationship to the original poemsthan showing the original poems would have been. except i kept the dates...i have little to no connection to the feelings that 'produced' the original poemsit's funny how sometimes you can be more honest about somethingby not including it. am i pulling this off?

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->