Upload_transparent

The Fluoride Debate - Letter to Forward....

 
 
 
 
 
Value This
Doc
Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 3 43
Words: 1207 13640
Characters: 7900 81678
Lines: 16 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.55 5.99
Words per line: 75.44 21.89
Words per page: 402.33 317.21

Add to your reading list

Flag_red Flag this document

Document Information

302 Reads | 0 Comments

Description

I wrote this letter to the town council in which I live and to the local newspaper after I read in the paper that the town is planning on putting fluoride BACK into the water! For a time we were fortunate enough not to have 'fluoride' (an industrial waste by-product IN REALITY!) in our water for a short time when the new reverse osmosis water treatment plant went into operation.

Up until I read the newspaper article my only concern was increased levels of chlorine even though it was claimed that less chlorine was being used. My argument with the chlorine is that perhaps less chlorine is being used but if the water is, say, 10 times less contaminated then before and only 5 times less chlorine is being used then there is actually twice as much chlorine in the water then 'need be'. This was/is a source of aggravation as I cannot get officials to reason beyond their 'programming'. Yet the fluoride issue is of greater urgency in my mind as the letter with article will explain. Please follow the links to get a fuller understanding of why fluoride is poisoinous to us. It should be sold to us as beneficial when it is actually a sidious means to control the population as you will see too once you look into it...

Openoffice_16x16 3 Pages


Date Added

06/12/2009

Category

Uncategorized.

Tags
Groups
Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

or use Facebook Connect