You are on page 1of 60

SCOPE OF MICROFINANCE AND

ITS IMPACT

AMITY UNIVERSITY UTTAR PRADESH

SUBMITTED TO : Mr. Kumar Saurabh

SUBMITTED BY: Karishma Jain BFIA VI A3110108022

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I wish to express my gratitude to my faculty guide Mr. Kumar Saurabh for his invaluable guidance and cooperation during the course of my dissertation. He provided me with him assistance and support whenever needed that has been instrumental in completion of this project.

The learning during the project was immense & invaluable. My work basically includes Scope of microfinance and its impact. The present report is an amalgamation of my thoughts and efforts.

Signature Karishma Jain

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER NO. 1 2

TOPIC Executive Summary Research Methodology A. Research Objective B. Research design C. Data collection D. Limitation of the study

PAGE NO. 4 5 5 5 5 6 7-8 9-19 20-24 25-26 27-31 32-38 39-40 41-43

3 4 5

Review of literature Industry Profile What is microfinance? Source of credit in India What are MFIs? Types of MFIs Interest Rate Micro Financial sector development & regulation bill,2007 Various MFIs & NGOs Impact of microfinance Present Scenario

44-50 51-55 56-58 59 60

6 7

Recommendations Bibliography

CHAPTER -1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


There is growing interest in microfinance as one of the avenues to enable low income population to access financial services. India with a population of around 300 million poor people has emerged as a large potential opportunity for the microfinance sector. With only 48% of the population accessing financial services, expanding the microfinance sector is also important from the perspective of financial inclusion(World Bank, 2008). Since 2004, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has emphasized financial inclusion as an important goal.

While there have been various initiatives to promote microfinance in India since the 1970s, the sector witnessed rapid growth only in the 1990s. The RBI has since the mid 1990s helped in attracting funding for the sector by including microfinance in the priority sector, to which banks are mandated to allocate a percentage of their lending. However, no specific regulation was imposed on the sector as a whole primarily because it was felt that regulation may hamper the sectors key strengths of informality and flexibility.

With the growth of the sector both in terms of size, scope and number of participants, there is however now a need for developing a more formal regulatory structure. First, regulation is needed to enable a number of large microfinance institutions (MFIs) to offer savings services, so as to address a major shortcoming of the sector. The largest MFIs in the country, which cumulatively account for 80% of the sector in terms of portfolio outstanding are non-banking finance companies (NBFCs), who are unable to accept savings deposits (Ghate, 2007). In order to do so, NBFCs need to obtain investment grade rating from a credit rating institution, which is difficult for the MFIs. As a result, most of the growth in microfinance in India has been concentrated on provision of loans or microcredit. Thus, this dissertation explores the development of microfinance in Indian and its impact om the Indian economy.

CHAPTER -2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

A. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The primary objective is to focus on the scope of microfinance and its impact on the Indian economy.

The secondary objectives are:-

y y y y y

Who is being served through micro finance? How microfinance help poor? Why do MFIs charge high interest rates to poor people? Who provide micro finance? What are the myths regarding MFIs?

B. RESEARCH DESIGN The research design adopted is Exploratory Research Design to know about the origin of microfinance and its impact. Exploratory research provides insights into and comprehension of an issue or situation.

C. DATA COLLECTION The data used in the study is secondary data. Secondary Data is the data which has been already collected by someone else for different and general purpose. The data is collected from reports and official publications, internet, online forums, journals and newspapers.

D. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

1. The concept of microfinance started in Bangladesh and my study is based on the Indian microfinance industry, so there might be some discrepancies between the two and they may not be clearly visible.

2. The information collected may not be highly credible since the banks in India do not have established microfinancing departments.

CHAPTER 3 REVIEW OF LITERATURE

According to the 2000 Population and Housing Census, 80% of the working population is found in the private informal sector. This group is characterized by lack of access to credit, which constrains the development and growth of that sector of the economy. Clearly, access to financial services is imperative for the development of the informal sector and also helps to mop up excess liquidity through savings that can be made available as investment capital for national development.

The former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan during the launch of the International Year of Micro Credit (2005), Sustainable access to microfinance helps alleviate poverty by generating income, creating jobs, allowing children to go to school, enabling families to obtain health care, and empowering people to make the choices that best serve their needs. (Kofi Annan, December 2003).

Micro credit is thus one of the critical dimensions of the broad range of financial tools for the poor, and its increasing role in development has emanated from a number of key factors that include; The fact that the poor need access to productive resources, with financial services being a key resource, if they are to be able to improve their conditions of life; The realization that the poor have the capacity to use loans effectively for income-generation, to save and repay loans.

According to Simanowitz and Brody (2004, p.1), micro-credit is a key strategy in reaching the MDGs and in building global financial systems that meet the needs of the most poor people. Littlefield, Murduch and Hashemi (2003) state, micro-credit is a critical contextual factor with strong impact on the achievements of the MDGs. Micro-credit is unique among development interventions: it can deliver social benefits on an ongoing, permanent basis and on a large scale. However, some schools of thought remain sceptical about the role of micro-credit in development. For example, while acknowledging the role micro-credit can play in helping to 7

reduce poverty, Hulme and Mosley (1996) concluded from their research on micro-credit that most contemporary schemes are less effective than they might be (1996, p.134). The authors contended that micro-credit is not a panacea for poverty-alleviation and that in some cases the poorest people have been made worse-off. This notwithstanding, microfinance has emerged globally as a leading and effective strategy for poverty reduction with the potential for far-reaching impact in transforming the lives of poor people. It is argued that microfinance can facilitate the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) as well as National Policies that target poverty reduction, empowering women, assisting vulnerable groups, and improving standards of living as could be infer from Kofi Annans speech above. The researcher with the information from the above contentions and postulations of the various researchers will explore the gaps in their submission as he investigates the correlation between monetary depth and poverty and moreover find out the impact and the essence of these MFIs vis--vis poverty alleviation in the country.

Commentators such as Littlefield, Murduch and Hashemi (2003), Simanowitz and Brody (2004) and the IMF (2005) have commented on the critical role of microfinance in achieving the Millennium Development Goals. Simanowitz and Brody (2004, p.1) state, Microfinance is a key strategy in reaching the MDGs and in building global financial systems that meet the needs of the most poor people. Littlefield, Murduch and Hashemi (2003) state microfinance is a critical contextual factor with strong impact on the achievements of the MDGsmicrofinance is unique among development interventions: it can deliver social benefits on an ongoing, permanent basis and on a large scale. Referring to various case studies, they show how microfinance has played a role in eradicating poverty, promoting education, improving health and empowering women (2003).

CHAPTER -4 INDUSTRY PROFILE

Growth of Micro-Finance Sector at Global Level

Let us look at the historical account of the emergence and growth of micro finance sector at the global level. The Grameen Bank, Bangladesh, was started as an experiment in 1976 and accorded a special banking charter in 1983. In 1981 NDF (National Development Foundation), Jamaica, was started with support of Pan American Development Foundation. In 1983 ADEMI (Association for Development of Micro Enterprises) was established in Dominican Republic, Santo Domingo with support from ACCION, an International Agency. In 1984 BRI (Bank Rakayat Indonesia) started micro-finance in Indonesia. In 1984, K-REP (Kenya Rural Enterprise Programme) was set up by USAID (United States Agency for International Development) to develop credit programmes for micro-enterprises through NGOs intermediation. In 1986 ACEP (Agence de Credit Pour L Enterprise Privee) was established in Senegal with the support of USAID.

In 1986, PRODEM (Foundation for the Promotion and Development of Micro Enterprises) which was established by USAID and ACCION International in Bolivia, started micro finance. Later on it was converted into a bank called Bancosol (Banco Solidario) in 1992. In 1987 IDH (Instituto de Desarrollo Hondurando) was started in Honduras with the support of Opportunity International. In 1992, BANPECO (Banco Nacional del Pequeno Comercio) that is, National Bank for Small Traders was renamed as BNCI (Banco Nacional de Comercio Interior), that is National Bank for Domestic Commerce and started micro-financing in urban areas of Mexico. Micro-Credit Summit (2-4 February, 1997) held at Washington D.C. was organized to launch a global movement to reach 100 million of the worlds poorest families, especially the women of those families, with credit for self-employment, by the year 2005.

Meanwhile, micro credit programs throughout the world improved upon the original methodologies and defied conventional wisdom about financing the poor. First, they showed that poor people, especially women, had excellent repayment rates among the better programs, 9

rates that were better than the formal financial sectors of most developing countries. Second, the poor were willing and able to pay interest rates that allowed microfinance institutions (MFIs) to cover their costs. 1990s These two features - high repayment and cost-recovery interest rates - permitted some MFIs to achieve long-term sustainability and reach large numbers of clients.

The 1990s saw growing enthusiasm for promoting microfinance as a strategy for poverty alleviation. The microfinance sector blossomed in many countries, leading to multiple financial services firms serving the needs of micro entrepreneurs and poor households. These gains, however, tended to concentrate in urban and densely populated rural areas. In the last two decades, the microfinance industry has faced three distinct waves of action. The first was when people working in developmental sector discovered the methodology of reaching micro-loans to the poor through a methodology mastered by Grameen Bank. The wave 2 came in when the first generation organizations reached scale and sought methods to morph into for-profit commercial organizations. The wave 3 is when mainstream commercial institutions like L&T finance, Equities and the private equity players started looking at microfinance as an interesting business. The basic methodology being used in commercial microfinance in India was innovated by Grameen Bank and later improvised by several players. It was not until the mid-1990s that the term "micro credit" began to be replaced by a new term that included not only credit, but also savings and other financial services. "Microfinance" emerged as the term of choice to refer to a range of financial services to the poor, that included not only credit, but also savings and other services such as insurance and money transfers.

Today, practitioners and donors are increasingly focusing on expanded financial services to the poor in frontier markets and on the integration of microfinance in financial systems development. The recent introduction by some donors of the financial systems approach in microfinance - which emphasizes favorable policy environment and institution-building - has improved the overall effectiveness of microfinance interventions. But numerous challenges remain, especially in rural and agricultural finance and other frontier markets. 10

Today, the microfinance industry and the greater development community share the view that permanent poverty reduction requires addressing the multiple dimensions of poverty. For the international community, this means reaching specific Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in education, women's empowerment, and health, among others. For microfinance, this means viewing microfinance as an essential element in any country's financial system.

11

CHALLENGES
For the first time people in the developmental sector were discovering a methodology where they could keep in touch with a large number of poor clients, scale rapidly, and actually count the direct impact of their work5. The counting could easily be done by number of clients reached, the portfolio quality, amount loaned and the magic 100% recovery statistic. This was a magic formula discovered and by the time the Microfinance Institutions [MFI] spent three to four years in operations, they found that there were challenges in keeping pace with the growth opportunities. From 2002 onwards we found these MFIs talking a new language the language of transformation.

Traditionally, banks have usually not provided financial services to clients with little or no cash income. In addition, most poor people have few assets that can be secured by a bank as collateral. This means that the bank will have little recourse against defaulting borrowers. Because of these difficulties, when poor people borrow they often rely on relatives or a local moneylender, whose interest rates can be very high. Moneylenders usually charge higher rates to poorer borrowers than to less poor ones. While moneylenders are often demonized and accused of usury, their services are convenient and fast, and they can be very flexible when borrowers run into problems. Hopes of quickly putting them out of business have proven unrealistic, even in places where micro finance institutions are very active. While the success of Grameen Bank (which now serves over seven million poor Bangladeshi women) has inspired the world, it has proved difficult to replicate this success in practice. In nations with lower population densities, meeting the operating costs of a retail branch by serving nearby customers has proven considerably more challenging.

NSSO data reveal that 45.9 million farmer households in the country (51.4%), out of a total of 89.3 million households do not access credit, either from institutional or non institutional sources. Further, despite the vast network of bank branches, only 27% of total farm households are indebted to formal sources(of which one-third also borrow from informal sources). Farm households not accessing credit from formal sources as a proportion to total farm households is especially high at 95.91%, 81.26% and 77.59% in the North Eastern, Eastern and Central Regions respectively. Thus, apart from the fact that exclusion in general 12

is large, it also varies widely across regions, social groups and asset holdings. The poorer the group, the greater is the exclusion. While financial inclusion can be substantially enhanced by improving the supply side or the delivery systems, it is also important to note that many regions, segments of the population and sub-sectors of the economy have a limited or weak demand for financial services. In order to improve their level of inclusion, demand side efforts need to be undertaken including improving human and physical resource endowments, enhancing productivity, mitigating risk and strengthening market linkages. However, the primary focus of the Committee has been on improving the delivery systems, both conventional and innovative.

LESSONS FROM INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCES Though country wise experience may vary, the lessons provide a sound basis for understanding the role and limitations of micro finance.

The poors are bankable:

The poor have always borrowed money for a multiplicity of purposes from informal sources and repaid most of these loans. A participatory involvement and realization that repayment enhances their long term borrowing capacity ensures the proper attitude towards repayment. At the same time, MFIs should have effective methods for monitoring the loans and ensuring repayment at convenient times.

Micro credit benefits the poor: Borrowers often increase their incomes and improve their livelihood because of micro credit. Employment impact is more limited. Micro finance leads to changes in the use of technology only of the less poor as adoption of new technology is risky and the poorer borrowers are more risk averse. Where wide gender disparities abound, micro finance catering to women raises their sense of participation and increases their empowerment.

13

Realistic interest rate is vital: While in the long run the interest charged by the MFIs should cover the total cost, there appears to be a good case for subsidizing cost of risk, as otherwise the interest cost could be prohibitive. Since the enhancement of repayment of loans is closely related to knowledge of borrowers, development of peer pressure and group responsibilities, these take time. Therefore while sustainability can be achieved only with interest cost meeting the total cost of lending, this can be achieved only after a gestation period. During this gestation period, MFIs should charge the cost of financial funds plus a margin it deems sufficient to cover part of the other costs. This rate of interest would be higher than the commercial banks lending rates but much lower than interest rate of informal lenders.

Governance and financial systems require strengthening: The issues of governance that require to be addressed include greater transparency in their activities and finances, the determination of the lines of responsibility and accountability and control of MFIs. The main issues revolve around the composition of the board of management, accounting systems and regulatory conformity. Good accounting practices are essential to insure accountability in continuous evaluation of performance.

Strong regulatory framework:

With an expansion in the number of MFIs and many of them accepting savings, it is generally argued that MFIs should be subject to a regulatory framework in the interest of both the poor, as also the long term viability and sustainability of MFIs. A cost effective or subsidized regulatory mechanism may be necessary.

No single model of MFI: The extent of participatory decision making has to be decided on the basis of whether collective decision making is a realistic option. While participatory involvement is desired, many other successful MFIs have adopted a 'top down' approach. Therefore, each MFI would 14

require to be designed according to the context and environment it operates in and be willing to respond to changes in the light of its own experience.

Most MFIs require outside funding: Most MFIs require outside finances for commencement and the gestation period. Other expenditure is likely to be so high in the beginning that a relatively high interest rate above the average of the market rate but below the informal moneylender rates is not likely to cover costs. Therefore substantial outside assistance would be needed to enlarge the number of MFIs and their outreach.

15

MAJOR MILESTONES IN INDIA

Major Commercial Banks Nationalized

Regional Rural Banks Established

NABARD Established as an Apex agency for rural finance

Establishment of SIDBI fouindation for micro credit

NABARD launches SHG bank linkage

Proposed Bill on Microfinance Regulation

A Brief History of Microfinance in India


The post-nationalization period in the banking sector, circa 1969, witnessed a substantial amount of resources being earmarked towards meeting the credit needs of the poor. There were several objectives for the bank nationalization strategy including expanding the outreach of financial services to neglected sectors (Singh, 2005). As a result of this strategy, the banking network underwent an expansion phase without comparables in the world. Credit came to be recognized as a remedy for many of the ills of the poverty. There spawned several pro-poor financial services, support by both the State and Central governments, which included credit packages and programs customized to the perceived needs of the poor.

While the objectives were laudable and substantial progress was achieved, credit flow to the poor, and especially to poor women, remained low. This led to initiatives that were institution driven that attempted to converge the existing strengths of rural banking infrastructure and 16

leverage this to better serve the poor. The pioneering efforts at this were made by National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), which was given the tasks of framing appropriate policy for rural credit, provision of technical assistance backed liquidity support to banks, supervision of rural credit institutions and other development initiatives.

In the early 1980s, the GoI launched the Integrated Rural Development Program (IRDP), a large poverty alleviation credit program, which provided government subsidized credit through banks to the poor. It was aimed that the poor would be able to use the inexpensive credit to finance themselves over the poverty line.

Also during this time, NABARD conducted a series of research studies independently and in association with MYRADA, a leading non-governmental organization (NGO) from Southern India, which showed that despite having a wide network of rural bank branches servicing the rural poor, a very large number of the poorest of the poor continued to remain outside the fold of the formal banking system. These studies also showed that the existing banking policies, systems and procedures, and deposit and loan products were perhaps not well suited to meet the most immediate needs of the poor. It also appeared that what the poor really needed was better access to these services and products, rather than cheap subsidized credit. Against this background, a need was felt for alternative policies, systems and procedures, savings and loan products, other complementary services, and new delivery mechanisms, which would fulfill the requirements of the poorest, especially of the women members of such households. The emphasis therefore was on improving the access of the poor to microfinance rather than just micro-credit.

To answer the need for microfinance from the poor, the past 25 years has seen a variety of microfinance programs promoted by the government and NGOs. Some of these programs have failed and the learning experience from them have been used to develop more effective ways of providing financial services. These programs vary from regional rural banks with a social mandate to MFIs. In 1999, the GoI merged various credit programs together, refined them and launched a new programme called Swaranjayanti Gram Swarazagar Yojana (SGSY). The mandate of SGSY is to continue to provide subsidized credit to the poor through

17

the banking sector to generate self-employment through a self-help group approach and the program has grown to an enormous size.

MFIs have also become popular throughout India as one form of financial intermediary to the poor. MFIs exist in many forms including co-operatives, Grameen-like initiatives and private sector MFIs. Thrift co-operatives have formed organically and have also been promoted by regional state organizations like the Cooperative Development Foundation (CDF) in Andhra Pradesh. The Grameen-like initiatives following a business model like the Grameen Bank. Private sector MFIs include NGOs that act as financial services providers for the poor and include other support services but are not technically a bank as they do not take deposits.

Recently, microfinance has garnered significant worldwide attention as being a successful tool in poverty reduction. In 2005, the GoI introduced significant measures in the annual budget affecting MFIs. Specifically, it mentioned that MFIs would be eligible for external commercial borrowings which would allow MFIs and private banks to do business thereby increasing the capacity of MFIs. Also, the budget talked about plans to introduce a microfinance act that would provide some regulations on the sector.

It is clear from the previous that the objectives of the bank sector nationalization strategy have resulted into several offshoots, some of which have succeeded and some have failed. Today, Self-Help Groups and MFIs are the two dominant form of microfinance in India.

Growth of microfinance in India


The growth of microfinance is visible in many aspects. There are more than 2000 NGOs involved in the NABARD SHG-Bank linkage program. Out of these, approximately 800 NGOs are involved in some form of financial intermediation. Further, there are 350 new generation co-operatives providing thrift and credit services. According to our estimate, the present total outstanding, including Sa-Dhan members and bank linkages is approximately Rs.700 crores (Rs. 150 crores of Sa-Dhan members and another Rs. 550 crores from the Banking system). The total client base is estimated at 6-8 million as opposed to the Government of India (GOI) intention to reach 25 million clients. The growth of community institutions has taken place with the role to take social and financial intermediation. A 18

numbers of community banks have come into existence at village and block levels call ' Federation of Self Help Groups'.

The inadequacies of the formal financial system to cater to the needs of the poor and the realization of the fact that the key to success lies in the evolution and participation of community based organizations at the grassroots level led to the emergence of new generation of MFIs.

One kind of MFI is an NGO engaged in promoting Self Help Groups (SHGs) and their federations at a cluster level and linking SHGs with Banks under the Scheme. Examples are Myrada in Karnataka, which has promoted Sanghmitra, a company of its village saving and credit sanghas, PRADAN which has established a large number of SHGs and federated them under Damodar in Bihar, Sakhi Samiti in Rajasthan.

Another kind is NGO-MFI directly lending to the poor borrowers, who are either organized into SHGs or into Grameen Bank type of groups after borrowing bulk funds from SIDBI, RMK and FWWB. Examples in this category are Rashtriya Gramin Vikas Nidhi (RGVN) which runs credit and savings programme in Assam and Orissa on the lines of Grameen Bank, Bangladesh. Also we have SHARE in AP, ASA in Tamil Nadu under this category.

There are MFIs which are specifically organized as cooperatives, such as over 500 Mutually Aided Cooperative Thrift and Credit Socities (MACTS) in AP, promoted among others by Cooperative Development Foundation (CDF) and the SEWA Bank in Gujarat which also runs federations of SHGs in nine districts.

Then we have MFIs, which are organize as Non-Banking Finance Companies (NBFC) such as BASIX, CFTS Mirzapur, SHARE Microfin. Ltd and Sarvodaya Nanofinance Ltd.

19

CHAPTER-5

What is microfinance?

The proposed Microfinance Services Regulation Bill defines microfinance services as providing financial assistance to an individual or an eligible client, either directly or through a group mechanism for:

I. an amount, not exceeding rupees fifty thousand in aggregate per individual, for small and tiny enterprise, agriculture, allied activities (including for consumption purposes of such individual) or II. An amount not exceeding rupees one lakh fifty thousand in aggregate per individual for housing purposes, or III. Such other amounts, for any of the purposes mentioned at items (i) and (ii) above or other purposes, as may be prescribed.

Microfinance is often defined as financial services for poor and low-income clients. In practice, the term is often used more narrowly to refer to loans and other services from providers that identify themselves as microfinance institutions (MFIs). These institutions commonly tend to use new methods developed over the last 30 years to deliver very small loans to unsalaried borrowers, taking little or no collateral. These methods include group lending and liability, pre-loan savings requirements, gradually increasing loan sizes, and an implicit guarantee of ready access to future loans if present loans are repaid fully and promptly.

More broadly, microfinance refers to a movement that envisions a world in which low-income households have permanent access to a range of high quality financial services to finance their income-producing activities, build assets, stabilize consumption, and protect against risks. These services are not limited to credit, but include savings, insurance, and money transfers.

20

Microfinance in India operates through two channels

1. Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) 2. NABARDs SHGsbank linkage programme (SBLP)- a partenership model between SHGs, banks and NGOs.

State Intervention In Rural Credit In India

In India, credit demands in the rural sector were largely met by cooperative societies till the mid 1960s. Though commercial banks in rural India largely supported agri-business and marketing, the credit flow to the rural sector was never sufficient to complete the demands. One of the objectives of the bank nationalization was to increase the flow of credit to the rural population. The largest micro credit programme in the world was Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP).

Government Sponsored Programmes The lack of any market based incentives for better performance of credit and deposit mobilization channels and the continued use of lending methodology which has systematically eroded credit discipline and has made the practice of micro finance more difficult in India than in many other developing countries are the two perspectives that need to be taken into consideration. In the sixth five year plan several anti poverty measures like IRDP, training of rural youth for self employment(TRYSEM), development of women and children in rural areas(DWRCA), national rural employment programme(NREP) and rural landless employment guarantee programme(RLEGP) were launched.

Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP) IRDP was launched in 1979 in 2300 select community development blocks and from October 2, 1980 it was extended to the entire country. 21

IRDP had two major components:

y y

Subsidy made available by the government The bank credit that was given alongside the subsidy to enable the beneficiary the access to farm and non-farm assets to generate income.

It recognized that poor may not have the required funds to meet with the margin requirements of the banks and aimed at promoting self employment through the provision of productive assets by providing them soft bank loans with a capital subsidy of up to 50%. Despite massive outreach the impact in terms of upliftment of households above the poverty line was dismal at 16-18%. The repayment rate in the IRDP programme has been low: 25-33%. The subsidy like loan waiver which was disagreed with all over the world was institutionalized in this scheme. The massive failure of the IRDP and its allied programmes forced the government to restructure them. Swanajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana(SGSY) was launched April 1,1999. it is conceived as a holistic programme of micro enterprise development in rural areas with the emphasis on organizing the rural poor into SHGs, capacity building, planning of activity clusters, infrastructure support etc. The programme has inbuilt safeguards for the weaker sections and is credit driven. A network of agencies at rural level such as district rural development agencies, NGOs, etc. implement this programme.

Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) Financial services in the rural sector are provided mainly by 33000 branches of the commercial banks, the branches of 91 RRBs and rural cooperatives. These came into existence because the banking commission had felt the need for a specialised network of bank branches to cater to the rural sector. Subsequently RRBs were instituted in 1975. Over the years this branch network has gone up. However the performance has not been good. In view of the importance of the RRBs it is likely that we are going to continue with the programme of strengthening the RRBs.

22

NABARD and SHG- Bank Linkage Programmes In 1992, NABARD issued policy guidelines for bank linkages with SHGs. Bank managers were initially reluctant to use the new lending technology. The SHG group guarantees the loan. Under the 1992 guideline, the SHG functions as a joint liability group, replacing the other collateral for the loans. The formation of SHGs is a costly task and requires intensive efforts in recognizing groups of people with common interests. The SHG bank linkage programme has its origins in a GTZsponsored project in Indonesia. The collateral free loans increase progressively to up to 4 times the level of the groups savings deposits. SHGs thus 'linked' became micro banks able to access funds from the formal banking system. The linkage permitted the reduction of transaction costs of the banks through the externalization of costs of servicing individual loans and through ensuring their repayment through peer pressure.

The outreach of the SHG bank linkage may seem to be impressive but in the context of the magnitude of poverty in India and the flow of funds of poverty alleviation it represents a very small intervention, accounting for less than 5% of the banking system's disbursements for agriculture and allied activities. Thus SHG has not made a significant addition to the credit flow to the rural areas.

23

Table 1 Outreach of SHG-Bank linkage

31.03.2000

31.03.2004

31.03.2007

1)Number of groups(000)

1147

1079 16.7

1143 41

2)Cumulative coverage(no. of families in 1.9 millions) 3) Womens group to total(%) 4)Cumulative bank loan(Rs.crores) 5)Repayment Bank/NGO)(%) 6)Average loan per SHG(Rs) 7)Average loan per family(Rs) 16814 1016 Rate(from 85 192.98 SHG- 95

90 3904 95

90 18041 >90

36179 2338

61678 n.a.

24

SOURCE OF CREDIT IN INDIA


Non-Institutional or Informal Sources of Micro-Credit in India In nutshell, one can say that RFIs do not fulfill the credit needs of the farmers, rural producers and the rural poor in general, resulting in non-institutional sources of credit. The indirect reason responsible for the growth of non-institutional sources of credit was also the economic weakness of the Jajmani System*. The non-institutional sources of credit would include big farmers, big farmer-cum-money-lenders, commission agents, friends/ relatives, moneylenders, traders, village shopkeepers and others. The All India Rural Credit Survey Committee, appointed by the RBI in 1951 under the Chairmanship of Gorwala, undertook a comprehensive survey of rural credit and submitted its report in August 1954. The survey revealed that shares of institutional and non-institutional sources of rural credit were 7.3 per cent and 92.7 per cent respectively.

At present about two-third of the credit need in rural areas is met out by informal sources. But the moneylenders have yet to disappear, though they charge very high rate of interest, varying between 36 to 30 % per annum. The is also need to sensitize the issue of informal rural banks that they provide timely and adequate credit to the rural poor without much paperwork and for any purpose, especially for meeting consumption and other social needs. But physical, economic and social exploitation of the poor people is attached with this system.

The Formal Sector Institutions: Traditionally, the formal sector Banking Institutions in India have been serving only the needs of the commercial sector and providing loans for middle and upper income groups. Similarly, for housing the HFIs have generally not evolved a lending product to serve the needs of the Very LIG primarily because of the perceived risks of lending to this sector. Following risks are generally perceived by the formal sector financial institutions:
y y y

Credit Risk High transaction and service cost Absence of land tenure for financing housing 25

y y y

Irregular flow of income due to seasonality Lack of tangible proof for assessment of income Unacceptable collaterals such as crops, utensils and jewellery

As far as the formal financial institutions are concerned, there are Commercial Banks, Housing Finance Institutions (HFIs), NABARD, Rural Development Banks (RDBs), Land Development Banks Land Development Banks and Co-operative Banks (CBs). As regards the Co-operative Structures, the Urban Co.op Banks (UCB) or Urban Credit Co.op Societies (UCCS) are the two primary co-operative financial institutions operating in the urban areas. There are about 1400 UCBs with over 3400 branches in India having 14 million members, their total lending outstanding in 1990-91 has been reported at over Rs 80 billion with deposits worth Rs 101 billion. Similarly there exist about 32000 credit co.op societies with over 15 million members with their total outstanding lending in 1990-91 being Rs 20 billion with deposits of Rs 12 billion.

The Government has taken several initiatives to strengthen the institutional rural credit system. The rural branch network of commercial banks have been expanded and certain policy prescriptions imposed in order to ensure greater flow of credit to agriculture and other preferred sectors. The commercial banks are required to ensure that 40% of total credit is provided to the priority sectors out of which 18% in the form of direct finance to agriculture and 25% to priority sector in favour of weaker sections besides maintaining a credit deposit ratio of 60% in rural and semi-urban branches. Further the IRDP introduced in 1979 ensures supply of credit and subsidies to weaker section beneficiaries. Although these measures have helped in widening the access of rural households to institutional credit, vast majority of the rural poor have still not been covered. Also, such lending done under the poverty alleviation schemes suffered high repayment defaults and left little sustainable impact on the economic condition of the beneficiaries.

26

WHAT ARE MFIs?


The proposed Microfinance Regulation Service Bill defines an MFI as an organization or association of individuals including the following if it is established for the purpose of carrying on the business of extending microfinance services:

I. A society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860,

II. A trust created under the Indian Trust Act,1880 or public trust registered under any State enactment governing trust or public, religious or charitable purposes,

III. A cooperative society / mutual benefit society / mutually aided society registered under any State enactment relating to such societies or any multistate cooperative society registered under the Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 but not including:

a cooperative bank as defined in clause (cci) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 or a cooperative society engaged in agricultural operations or industrial activity or purchase or sale of any goods and services.

MFI objectives
Academics as well as practitioners disagree amongst themselves on which are the optimal objectives and methods of MFIs. Different groups emphasize social welfare and financial efficiency respectively. These objectives are somewhat mutually exclusive since there is a trade-off between outreach, impact and sustainability in microfinance lending. Outreach is defined as the effort of MFIs to extend loans to a wider audience (breadth of outreach), and especially to poor people (depth of outreach). Impact, on the other hand, refers to whether microfinance really helps the borrowers, i.e. raises the incomes and welfare of the poor. The third term, sustainability, implies full cost recovery at worst and profitability 27

considering the cost of capital at best. A sustainable MFI is not dependent on subsidies from governments or donors.

The goal for MFIs should be: I. To improve the quality of life of the poor by providing access to financial and support services; II. To be a viable financial institution developing sustainable communities; III. To mobilize resources in order to provide financial and support services to the poor, particularly women, for viable productive income generation enterprises enabling them to reduce their poverty; IV. Learn and evaluate what helps people to move out of poverty faster; V. To create opportunities for self-employment for the underprivileged; VI. To train rural poor in simple skills and enable them to utilize the available resources and contribute to employment and income generation in rural areas.

Constraints

To increase the outreach of micro finance services to the needy the issues or problems associated with the legal, regulatory, organisational systems should be addressed. Some of the main constraints are:

y Borrower-unfriendly products and procedures: Most bank products are standardised. The branches do not have the right to modify the projects. Hence the products do not reach the rural poor. y Inflexibility and delay: Banks follow rigid procedures which result in a lot of delay. Borrowers are de-motivated from taking further loans. Thus the amount of loans and their terms are prefixed for a given set of client y High transaction costs: The interest rate offered to the borrowers is regulated and so the transaction costs are high. The borrowers have to make a large number of trips to provide the documents. This makes loans less attractive for borrowers

28

y Legal and regulatory framework: The policymakers feel that farmers and poor people need low interests and subsidised credit. They believe that the poor cannot save, they are unwilling to repay the loans and the administrative costs are high for servicing them. The RRBs act does not permit private shareholding in any RRBs, and the cooperative acts of all states do not permit district level cooperative banks to be setup except by the state government. The result of these two acts is that rural credit has been a monopoly of the state owned institutions. y Legal constraints: A majority of MFIs function as NGOs to accept funds. The major

sources of funds for NGOs are grants that are very limited. NGOs do not have appropriate financial structure for carrying out micro finance activities. NGOs being registered as societies or trusts do not have equity capital and can never have adequate capital. The other alternative for the MFIs is to become a cooperative or a company. As in the long run the primary source of lending funds for MFIs is deposits, till that stage, the MFI has to rely on borrowings and to get it; it has to have equity capital. y Lack of commercial orientation: Most of the MFI in the initial period are highly successful in making credit to customers available at low cost on account of subsidies and grants that the MFIs are able to attract. However the fail to maintain the same record in the long run because of the lack of commercial orientation. y Lack of proper governance and accountability: Governance and accountability are limited in the case of not for profit organisations. This needs to be improved. The lender should be more stringent.

29

Microfinance Institutions:
The following are the some of leading microfinance institutions in India working in the sector .  Association for Sarva Seva Farms (ASSEFA)  Mitrabharati - The Indian microfinance Development Agency (MYRADA)  SADHAN - The Association of Community Development Finance Institutions  SEWA: Self-help Women's Association  SKS India - Swayam Krishi Sangam  Streedhan - Banking with Rural Women  Working Women's Forum, Madras, India Information Hub Mysore Resettlement and

ACCION International, it is a Latin Americas one of the prime microfinance institution working with the poor. In an early pioneer, ACCION was founded by a law student, Joseph Blatchford, to address poverty in Latin America's cities. Begun as a student-run volunteer effort in the shantytowns of Caracas with $90,000 raised from private companies, ACCION today is one of the premier microfinance organizations in the world, with a network of lending partners that spans Latin America, the United States and Africa.

SEWA Bank. In 1972 the Self Employed Women's Association (SEWA) was registered as a trade union in Gujarat (India), with the main objective of "strengthening its members' bargaining power to improve income, employment and access to social security." In 1973, to address their lack of access to financial services, the members of SEWA decided to found "a bank of their own". Four thousand women contributed share capital to establish the Mahila SEWA Co-operative Bank. Since then it has been providing banking services to poor, illiterate, self-employed women and has become a viable financial venture with today around 30,000 active clients.

30

Grameen Bank. In Bangladesh, Professor Muhammad Yunus addressed the banking problem faced by the poor through a programme of action-research. With his graduate students in Chittagong University in 1976, he designed an experimental credit programme to serve them. It spread rapidly to hundreds of villages. Through a special relationship with rural banks, he disbursed and recovered thousands of loans, but the bankers refused to take over the project at the end of the pilot phase. They feared it was too expensive and risky in spite of his success. Eventually, through the support of donors, the Grameen Bank was founded in 1983 and now serves more than 4 million borrowers. The initial success of Grameen Bank also stimulated the establishment of several other giant microfinance institutions like BRAC, ASA, Proshika, etc.

Through the 1980s, the policy of targeted, subsidized rural credit came under a slow but increasing attack as evidence mounted of the disappointing performance of directed credit programs, especially poor loan recovery, high administrative costs, agricultural development bank insolvency, and accrual of a disproportionate share of the benefits of subsidized credit to larger farmers.

The basic tenets underlying the traditional directed credit approach were debunked and supplanted by a new school of thought called the "financial systems approach", which viewed credit not as a productive input necessary for agricultural development but as just one type of financial service that should be freely priced to guarantee its permanent supply and eliminate rationing. The financial systems school held that the emphasis on interest rate ceilings and credit subsidies retarded the development of financial intermediaries, discouraged intermediation between savers and investors, and benefited larger scale producers more than small scale, low-income producers.

31

TYPES OF MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS


Microfinance institutions develop and deliver a range of financial products for the poor. There are three categories of microfinance institutions. They are:

Micro finance institutions

Non - profit

Mutual Benefit

For profit

1. Non profit MFIs/NGO MFIs It consist ofa) Public Trust b) Societies c) Section 25 Companies

These are Societies under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 or corresponding State Acts. Others in this category are Public Trusts under the Indian Trust Act 1882, and non-profit companies under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956. There are several NGOs which are registered as trust/society and have helped the SHGs form into federations. Federations are formal institutions and carry out both non-financial and financial activities including social and capacity building activities, SHG training, and promotion of new groups, apart from financial 32 intermediation.

These institutions cannot undertake financial intermediation activities on a large scale, as they are prohibited from carrying out any commercial activities.

The Role of NGOs Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) have emerged as an integral part of the institutional structure for addressing poverty as well as rural development, gender equality, environmental conservation, disaster management, human rights and other social issues.

The NGOs, in order to support social and economic empowerment of the poor, have vastly widened their activities to include group formation, micro credit, formal and non-formal education, training, health and nutrition, family planning and welfare, agriculture and related activities, water supply and sanitation, human rights and advocacy, legal aid and other areas.

These organizations mostly follow the target-group strategy under which the poor with similar socioeconomic interests are organized into groups to achieve their objectives.

2. Mutual benefit - It consist ofa) Self- help groups and Federation b) Co- operative Societies

Since the reconstitution of the Commission in January 2000, the Commission started projects with the aim of making women economically empowered. One of the major initiatives taken by the Delhi Commission for Women in the year 2000-2001 was to set up pilot projects in collaboration with partner NGOs for empowering women economically and thus helping prevent crimes against women. The Commission tied up with various NGOs working in various parts of Delhi for formation of Self-Help Groups.

What is SHGs Self help support groups provide a setting in which people who share similar experiences come together to offer practical and emotional support in a reciprocal and mutually beneficial manner. People go to self help support groups for many different reasons. 33

Self Help Group (SHG) is a small voluntary association of poor people, preferably from the same socioeconomic background. They come together for the purpose of solving their common problems through self-help and mutual help. The SHG promotes small savings among its members. The savings are kept with a bank. This common fund is in the name of the SHG. Usually, the number of members in one SHG does not exceed twenty.

The concept of SHG is based on the following principles:

Self-help supplemented with mutual help can be a powerful vehicle for the poor in their socioeconomic development;

Participative financial services management is more responsive and efficient; Poor need not only credit support, but also savings and other services; Poor can save and are bankable and SHGs as clients, result in wider out reach, lower transaction cost and much lower risk costs for the banks;

Creation of a common fund by contributing small savings on a regular basis; Flexible democratic system of working; Loaning is done mainly on trust with a bare documentation and without any security; Amounts loaned are small, frequent and for short duration; Defaults are rare mainly due to group pressure; and Periodic meetings non-traditional savings.

Essential Features of SHGs: The following are the major essential features to be kept in mind for successful functioning of SHGs.

Group members come together voluntarily. Basis of coming together is mutual help. Homogenous group. Regular interaction among group members Group independently takes decision and manages its activities. Basis of people coming together is affinity. 34

All group members' participation is the process. Cooperation and discussion are the cornerstone of its functioning group maintains its own accounts

SHG is a group formed by the community women, which has specific number of members like 15 or 20. In such a group the poorest women would come together for emergency, disaster, social reasons, economic support to each other have ease of conversation, social interaction and economic interactions.

Objectives To sensitize women of target area for the need of SHG and its relevance in their empowerment process.
y y y y

To create group feeling among women. To enhance the confidence and capabilities of women. To develop collective decision making among women. To encourage habit of saving among women and facilitate the accumulation of their own capital resource base.

To motivate women taking up social responsibilities particularly related to women development.

3. For profit - It consist of NBFCs.


It is an heterogeneous group of institutions (other than commercial and co-operative banks) performing financial intermediation in a variety of ways, like accepting deposits, making loans and advances, leasing, hire purchase, etc. They raise funds from the public, directly or indirectly, and lend them to ultimate spenders. They advance loans to the various wholesale and retail traders, small-scale industries and self-employed persons. Thus, they have broadened and diversified the range of products and services offered by a financial sector. Gradually, they are being recognised as complementary to the banking sector due to their customer-oriented services; simplified procedures; attractive rates of return on deposits; flexibility and timeliness in meeting the credit needs of specified sectors; etc. 35

The working and operations of NBFCs are regulated by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)within the framework of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (Chapter III B) and the directions issued by it under the Act. As per the RBI Act, a 'non-banking financial company' is defined as:- (i) a financial institution which is a company; (ii) a non banking institution which is a company and which has as its principal business the receiving of deposits, under any scheme or arrangement or in any other manner, or lending in any manner; (iii) such other non-banking institution or class of such institutions, as the bank may, with the previous approval of the Central Government and by notification in the Official Gazette, specify.

PRODUCT AND SERVICES

Micro-finance could be defined as a set of services comprising the following activities:

Micro lending Over the years, NGOs in microfinance have developed innovative lending methodologies to reach poor clients with microloans. They have borrowed many of their practices from informal finance. Absence of these methodologies explains, in part, why formal lending institutions such as banks have traditionally had difficulty reaching micro clients. Some of the principal characteristics of micro lending are:

Short-term, working-capital loans; Lending based on character, rather than collateral; Sequential loans, starting small and increasing in size; Group loan mechanisms as a collateral substitute; Quick cash-flow analysis of businesses and households, especially for individual loans; Prompt loan disbursement and simple loan procedures; Frequent repayment schedules to facilitate monitoring of borrowers; Interest rates considerably higher than those for larger bank customers to cover all costs of the microfinance program; Prompt loan collection procedures; Simple lending facilities, close to clients; 36

Staff drawn from local communities with access to information about potential clients; and Computerization with special software to allow loan tracking for larger programs.

Micro deposits The new microfinance bankers knew relatively little about deposit mobilization methodologies that reach the low-income and/or microenterprise client. There were some notable exceptions, however, such as the Bank Rakyat Indonesia and the Bank Dagang Bali. Perhaps best known is the Bank Rakyat Indonesia Unit Desa savings program, which has the following characteristics:

Features attractive to the micro client: Liquid passbook savings accounts and low minimum balances; Depositories conveniently located; Secure deposits; and Real, positive interest rates on deposits.

Operational features of the program: Savings accounts with very low minimum balances; Lower levels of interest, compared with commercial banks, because of higher administrative costs; Simple, hospitable buildings and mobile units with low overhead; Simple administrative forms and procedures; Courteous and friendly staff; and Incentives for savings, such as lotteries.

Human Resources Until recently, microfinance methodologies have been labor-intensive, and all the bankers interviewed evinced special concern for recruitment, training, and motivation of staff.

Micro insurance Gives the entrepreneurs the chance to focus more on their core business which drastically reduces the risk affecting their property, health or working possibilities. The is different types of insurance services like life insurance, property insurance, health insurance 37

and disability insurance. The spectrum of services in this sphere is constantly expanded, as schemes and terms of providing insurance services are determined by each company individually;

Micro leasing For entrepreneurs or small businesses who can t afford buy at full cost they can instead lease equipment, agricultural machinery or vehicles. Often no limitations of minimum cost of the leased object;

Money transfer A service for transferring money, mainly overseas to family or friends. Money transfers without opening current accounts are performed by a number of commercial banks through international money transfer systems such as Western Union , Money Gram, and Anelik. On the surface they may seem like small money transfers, but when one considers that such transactions take place millions of times around the world each week, the numbers start to become impressive. According to the World Bank, the annual global market for remittances money transferred home from migrant workers is around 167 billion US dollars. The estimated total is closer to 230 billion dollars if one counts unregulated transactions. Remittances are also an important source of income for many developing countries including India, China and Mexico, all of which receive over 20 billion dollars each year in remittances from abroad.

38

INTEREST RATE CHARGED BY MFIs

Interest charged on loans is the main source of income for MFIs. Thus they must be high enough to cover operational costs. Since micro-lending remains a high-cost operation, interest rates remain high. MFIs in the Asia-Pacific region charge rates ranging from 30 to 70% a year. However, it is important to remember that comparisons with rates charged by commercial banks are inappropriate. In that case, larger loans mean lower transaction costs and result in lower interest rates.

Still, there is much to be gained through lower microcredit interest rates. The current high costs mean microcredit efforts are not reaching as many people as they could be. Interest rates charged for lending are a function of a number of factors, of those, transaction costs and risk figure prominently into the derivation of micro-lending interest rates. Micro-lenders are subject to significantly higher transaction costs than banks in the developed world, both in absolute and relative terms.

Three types of costs are associated with the lending process:

1. The cost of funds for on-lending, 2. The cost of risk (loan loss), and 3. Administrative costs (identifying and screening clients, processing loan applications, disbursing payments, collecting repayments, and following up on non-repayment).

With regard to loan administration, Microcredit is an industry that is heavily dependent on personal contact for its execution . This is very time-consuming and resource intensive, and allows each loan officer to reach only a limited audience of potential borrowers. By contrast, much of the administrative process for commercial banks leverages technology for computerized credit scoring, communication with clients and payment processing. Not only is the administrative process less efficient for a micro-lender for each loan, but the problem is compounded further by the fact that while a developed commercial institution may lend a large sum of money to one borrower, a micro-lender will lend very small sums to many 39

borrowers, thereby multiplying the total administrative costs by X number of borrowers. Providing financial services to poor people is quite expensive, especially in relation to the size of the transactions involved. This is one of the most important reasons why banks don't usually provide small loans. Lets take an example: A US$100 loan, for example, requires the same personnel and resources as a $1,000 one thus increasing per unit transaction costs. Loan officers must visit the client's home or place of work, evaluate creditworthiness on the basis of interviews with the client's family and references, and in many cases, visit their clients to reinforce the repayment culture. It can easily cost $25 to make a icroloan. In absolute terms this is asily understandable but in relative erms it might represent 25% of the alue of the loan, and force the nstitution to charge a seemingly high rate of interest to cover the cost of its oan administration.

Why clients are willing and able to pay these rates


Practical evidence shows that clients are willing to pay the higher interest rates necessary to assure long term access to credit. They recognize that their alternativeseven higher interest rates in the informal sector(moneylenders, etc.) or simply no access to creditare much less attractive for them.

Interest rates in the informal sector can be as high as 20 percent per day among some urban market vendors. Many of the economic activities in which the poor engage are relatively low return on labor, and access to liquidity and capital can enable the poor to obtain significantly higher returns, or to take advantage of economic opportunities. The return received on such investments is often many times greater than the interest rate charged. In economic terms we could say that poor people previously without access to capital operate in a very steep part of the utility curve. This fact actually makes microfinance economically viable and is one of the core drivers of what we expect will be a rapid expansion of private-sector led microfinance initiatives in the next year.

40

Micro financial sector development and regulation bill, 2007

The Micro Financial Sector (Development and Regulation) Bill, 2007 seeks to promote the sector and regulate micro financial organizations (MFO). The Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha on March 20, 2007. It has been referred to the Standing Committee on Finance (Chairperson: Shri Ananth Kumar) on April 27, 2007.

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE BILL


 The Micro Financial Sector (Development and Regulation) Bill, 2007 seeks to

promote the sector and regulate micro financial organisations (MFO).


 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) shall regulate the

micro financial sector.


 Every MFO that accepts deposits needs to be registered with NABARD. Conditions

for registration include (a) net owned funds of at least Rs 5 lakh; and (b) at least three years in existence as an MFO. All MFOs, whether registered or not, shall submit annual financial statements to NABARD.
 Every MFO that accepts deposits has to create a reserve fund by transferring a

minimum of 15% of its net profit realised out of its thrift and micro finance services every year.
 The central government may establish a Micro Finance Development Council to

advise NABARD on formulation of policies related to the micro financial sector.


 NABARD shall constitute a Micro Finance Development and Equity Fund to be

utilized for the development of the sector.

41

DEFINATIONS IN THE BILL

MICROFINANCE-Micro finance is defined as the provision of thrift (savings), credit and other financial services and products of very small amounts to the poor for enabling them to raise their income levels and improve living standards.

MFO- the Bill defines an MFO as any organization that provides micro finance services and includes societies, trusts, and co-operative societies (except co-operative banks, agricultural co-operative societies, and co-operative societies engaged in industrial activity or sale of any goods and services). The definition of MFO excludes SHGs and groups of SHGs.

MICRO FINANCIAL SERVICES -micro financial services to include insurance and pension services without specifying to whom such services are to be provided. This implies that every insurance and pension company would be regulated by NABARD.

An MFO may provide micro financial services to an 'eligible client'. Such services may be in the form of financial assistance which cannot exceed (a) Rs 50,000 in aggregate per individual for small and tiny enterprise, agriculture, and allied activities or (b) Rs 1.5 lakh in aggregate per individual for housing purposes. These services also include insurance and pension services, and such other services as may be specified by NABARD. In India, micro finance is provided by apex development financial institutions (such as National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development - NABARD, Small Industries Development Bank of India, and Rashtriya Mahila Kosh), commercial banks, regional rural banks, co-operative banks, non banking financial companies (NBFCs) and various not-forprofit entities.

There are different mechanisms through which the delivery of micro credit loans takes place. Banks may lend directly to customers. Second, NABARD sponsors the Self Help Group-Bank Lending Programme (SBLP). Under SBLP, self help groups (SHGs) need to save regularly for a minimum of six months and maintain prescribed records and accounts in order to become eligible to be linked to local banks. This programme provides credit to 22.38 lakh SHGs.

42

Third, commercial banks or apex institutions lend to micro finance organizations (MFOs) for further lending to groups or individuals (see chart below).

Chart: Institutional flow of micro finance

Key Concerns
1. It leaves non-banking financial companies and section 25 companies out of the purview of its regulatory framework. 2. Does not regulate or put a ceiling on the interest rate charged to the clients in SHGs. 3. It gives license to Micro Finance Organisations to make profit out of the thrift of the poor women. 4. It weakens financial and social responsibility of banks, which will have a bad impact on the poorest of the poor. 5. It leaves non-banking financial companies and section 25 companies out of the purview of its regulatory framework. 6. It does not regulate or put a ceiling on the interest rate charged to the clients in SHGs. 7. It gives license to Micro Finance Organisations to make profit out of the thrift of the poor women. 8. It weakens financial and social responsibility of banks, which will have a bad impact on the poorest of the poor. 9. It ignores the empowerment aspect of micro finance which should be an integral part of all womens self help groups.

43

Various micro finance institutions and NGOs

Bandhan
Bandhan was born as a capacity building institution (CBI) in the year 2000 with the objective of addressing two grave issues:

y y

Poverty alleviation women empowerment

The sole solution to it lay in increasing the family income through women. This in turn called for promotion, generation and development of income generating activities through the easy accessibility of credit. Its initial objective as a capacity building institution was to build weak MFIs into strong and effective source for the development of the poor and to ensure maximum outreach from these organizations. In this regard, Bandhan felt the need of a laboratory where the trainee MFIs after their training can have the first hand knowledge of microfinance and its various facets. Thus the konnagar branch was opened up in the year 2001.However during it's tenure as a CBI Bandhan came across various experiences that were responsible for its pivotal shift to microfinance.

A visit to Bangladesh finalized Bandhan's decision to shift to credit delivery systems. It decided starting work back in Bangladesh.

44

Financial products
1 Micro Loan Product Bandhan offers Micro loan (1 year) to the borrowers. Bandhan follows a group formation, individual lending approach. A group of 10-25 is formed and regular meetings are called. After the members have attended the group meetings for two successive weeks, they are entitled to loans. The loans are disbursed individually and directly to the borrowers through the group.

2 Micro Enterprise programme (MEP) Bandhan has realized that certain members have graduated in their capacities to take and manage higher loans. These members demand a much higher loan cycle which is not at present covered by the micro loan product of Bandhan. Thus to cater to these needs it introduced the micro enterprise programme, a result of a few modifications in the micro loan product.

3 Micro Health Loan Over the years, Bandhan has been forwarding loans for income generation purposes however the members are equally susceptible to health hazards and end up spending the loans on the health concerns. Taking this into account Micro Health Loan was launched that would address health emergency needs of the client and their family members i.e. husband's and children's only.

45

Figure 1 Caste wise coverage in 2007-08 (micro health loan)

4 Insurance

Bandhan has tied up with Life Insurance Corporation to provide insurance coverage for the entire loan amount availed in case of death of the beneficiary. Hundred percent of their beneficiaries are covered under the programme. The programme is currently running in the districts of Murshidabad, Malda and South- 24 parganas. Assets worth Rs.1531,663 have been distributed to 397 beneficiaries. Assets are cow rearing, sheep rearing etc. The programme is also piloted in 4 urban branches of Kolkata. Assets worth Rs.42,016 have been distributed to 23 beneficiaries. Most of the beneficiaries have graduated to local micro finance programs.

5 Micro finance and Health protection (MAHP) initiative Bandhan was extending micro finance services but realized that emergency health concerns caused income leakage. Keeping this in mind Bandhan introduced it's Health programme with 46

assistance of freedom from hunger (FFH), a California based organization. The goal of the programme is to reduce the health expenditure of the poor families, in a way to sustain the micro finance programme of Bandhan.

KASHF Inspired by the success of the Grameen Bank, Kashf Foundation (meaning miracle or revelation i.e. a process of self-discovery) began in 1996 as an action research program focusing, for the first two years, on determining and understanding key factors having an impact on the demand for micro finance services by poor women. Kashf Foundation began with many firsts: it was the first specialized Micro finance institution in Pakistan, it was the first Micro finance institution targeting only women from low income communities and it was also the first Micro finance institution to charge a sustainable price for its services. Since its inception, Kashf Foundation has continued to trail-blaze in 1999 it introduced the first pro-women consumption loan in the sector, in 2001 it was the first Micro finance institution to offer micro-insurance services by collaborating with one of Pakistans oldest insurance companies, in 2003 it was the first Micro finance institution to become financially sustainable, in 2004 it was the first Micro finance institution to obtain an investable credit rating and in 2007 it has been able to close over $36 million in commercial deals with key local and international banks.

KASHF offers the following products to it's clients: 1 General loan (GL): The GL is based on group collateral where a group of 25 women jointly insure each other against default. In light of KASHF's strong commitment to customer care, center members have to wait only 7 days after their registration to get the first loan, while repeat clients can obtain a loan within 24 hours. The loans are advanced to female members of the household and it is the mutual decision of the household to decide on the economic activity that they will invest in.

47

2 Emergency loans (EL): The Emergency loan has been designed to provide credit to clients during financially volatile periods. Clients use EL to pay their children's school fees, utility bills and all other unplanned petty expenditures. The EL loan is very easy and quick to access. Timely access to money gives women a sense of relief and comfort since they are able to meet the needs of their families and do not have to borrow at exorbitant rates from traditional money lenders or request it from relatives and friends. The product is seen as a client friendly and women friendly product due to its ease of availability. The EL serves as a complementary loan to the GL and loans are disbursed through the same center methodology. 3 Home Improvement Loan (HIL): Kashf introduced the HIL in 2006, since home improvement and renovation was identified as a key priority by clients. The loan aims to increase the asset value of clients homes and improve their living standards. Although seen as a non-productive loan some clients have used it to make a room for the purpose of rental, while others have used it to provide a shed for their cattle. Also, some of Kashfs rental clients have been able to use it to construct basic structures on plots of land they previously owned and which they hope to improve incrementally. The HIL works on the same group liability model where three to ten clients from the existing center form an HIL group and the responsibility of approval and repayment lies with the center. Since its inception in July 2006, a total of 215 loans have been disbursed resulting in a total disbursement of Rs 4,680,000.

4 Business Surmaya Loan (BSL): Clients requiring loans below Rs 500,000 cannot obtain access to formal financial sources, since such amounts are still too small for commercial banks. Kashf targets fast moving small entrepreneurs through the BSL, the entire methodology of which is based on a credit scoring model. The BSL is advanced to clients with a minimum of 2 years running experience of their businesses and has no collateral requirements. Generally the loan has a minimum processing time of less than 5 days.

48

5 Insurance Credit for life insurance has been a popular product amongst Kashfs clients, since economic upheavals are a regular part of their lives. Kashf was one of the pioneer organizations to introduce life insurance for poor clients in order to deal with emergency periods. This service is provided to the client and her spouse at a minimal premium. The insurance covers all outstanding loan balances plus a small burial payout at the time of the death of either party. This means that the family is able to cope with the consequences of such an event and faces no liabilities at that time. This saves them from the exploitative lending practices of the traditional money lender, where the burden of repayment of the loan is transferred to the remaining family members.

What is the difference between microfinance and microcredit?


Microfinance is defined as the practice of providing financial services such as loans as low as $100, savings and insurance to very poor families, to help them grow tiny businesses or engage in other productive economic activities. This process enables the working poor to become more self-sufficient and in turn, improve the lives of family members, communities and whole societies. Microfinance used to be known only as microcredit, or just the part of financial services that refers to loans. Microcredit came to prominence in the 1980s, though early experiments date back 30 years ago in Brazil, Bangladesh and a few other countries. This innovation empowered the poor in a new way by providing them with access to financial services that were formal and secure. Microcredit also solved the problems of earlier kinds of development lending by insisting on repayment, by charging interest rates that could cover the costs of delivering credit, and by focusing on clients whose alternative source of credit was informal and insecure. Microcredit is loaned to a micro-entrepreneur by a bank or other institution and can be offered, often without collateral, to a group or an individual.

49

Group lending, also known as solidarity group lending or village banking, is a mechanism that allows a number of individuals to gain access to microcredit by providing collateral or guaranteeing a loan through a group repayment pledge. The incentive to repay is based upon peer pressure; if one person in the group defaults, the other group members make up the payment amount.

Individual lending focuses on providing microcredit to one client and does not require other people to provide collateral or guarantee a loan.

One type of microcredit is a working capital loan which is most often used by a client to purchase additional inventory for their business, such as bags of grain for a grain seller or soft drinks for a beverage vendor. Over time, the microfinance industry recognized that the poor who lack access to traditional formal financial services required a variety of financial products to meet their needs, not just microcredit. So microcredit evolved into microfinance. Microfinance includes a broader range of services, such as loans, savings, insurance and transfer services (remittances) targeted at low-income clients. A variety of institutions can provide these services, including NGOs, credit unions, cooperatives, private commercial banks, non-bank financial institutions (some that have transformed from NGOs into regulated institutions) and parts of state-owned banks.

50

The Impact of Microcredit

1. Microcredit and the Millennium Development Goals In 1996 Ismail Serageldin, the then chair of the Consultative Group to Assist the Poorest (CGAP) claimed that [m]icrofinance is a proven instrument to assist the very poor. This view is also shared by the World Watch Institute5 and underlines what has been stated above, namely, that microfinance can be used as a strong anti-poverty tool. But does microfinance actually meet these expectations and keep this promise?

The impact that microcredit has on the lives of poor people will be demonstrated by showing how it contributes to each of the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which are related to the reduction of poverty in all its forms. These goals were resolved in September 2000 by the General Assembly of the UN in their Millennium Declaration.

2. The Eradication of extreme Poverty and Hunger The aim of the first MDG is to halve the proportion of people who live on less than $1 a day between 1990 and 2015. According to current population projections of the World Bank, this would equal 849 million people in 2015.

Today almost 1.1 billion people live on less than $1 and more than 2.7 Billion live on less than $2 per day. The mean income for those living under $1 a day is $0.77 and it is $1.25 for those living under $2 a day. While the number of people living on less than $1 per day is slowly decreasing and is expected to be 913 million in 2015, the number of people living on less than $2 a day is actually increasing. One of the outcomes from this degree of poverty is that more than 27,000 children die every day from mostly preventable diseases, many of them related to hunger.

Microcredit enables poor people to start new businesses, or to diversify existing ones, which help them to increase their income. In addition to large amounts of anecdotal evidence, several studies have documented the positive economic impact microcredit has on its clients. Cloud and Panjaitan-Drioadisuryo have found that the average income of a sample of BRI borrowers has increased by 112 percent and that 90 percent of their families have crossed the poverty 51

line.60 Only 12 out of the 121 respondents of that study reported that their income had not increased.61 According to the Grameen Bank website, 51.09 percent of their clients have crossed the poverty line since they took their first loan.

3. Achievement of universal primary Education The aim of the second MDG is to ensure that all children will be able to complete primary school by 2015. Currently more than 100 million children, most of them girls, are not in school.Besides school fees, poor households often can not afford to send their children to school because they need them to help in the family business. Microcredit programs mainly contribute to the second MDG by increasing familys income and therefore enabling parents to send their children to school. Barnes, Gaile and Kibombo found that clients of an MFI in Uganda spent significantly more on childrens education than non-clients, and in Zambia Barnes showed that ongoing participation in the Zambuko Trusts program had a positive impact on the members children staying in school. In Bangladesh, the probability of girls enrolling in school increased by 1.9 percent for every 1 percent increase in Grameen Bank loans to female clients. For boys this number was even higher with the mean being 2.4 percent.

4. Promote gender Equality and empower Women The aim of the third MDG is to eliminate the disparity in the ratios of girls to boys in primary, secondary and tertiary education, in the ratio of literate females to males and to increase the share of women in the labor market and in parliament.

At present the literacy rate for women is lower than for man all over the world. According to the Human Development Report 2004, the average female literacy rate as a percentage of male literacy rate is 75.9 in developing countries and is as low as 37 in Niger. But women are not only discriminated against in education but also in access to medical services and therefore have a higher mortality rate than man. The worldwide tendency for women to be underrepresented in the labor market and in the parliaments is even more severe in developing countries.

52

5. Reduce Child Mortality and improve Maternal Health The aim of the fourth MDG is to reduce the under-five mortality rate by two-thirds between 1990 and 2015 and the fifth MDG strives for a three quarter reduction in the maternal mortality ratio by the same date.

MFIs are mainly contributing to these MDGs by increasing families income and therefore enabling the households to afford better nutrition and medical services. Furthermore, they are often linked with micro insurance or health education programs. Although no study has been conducted so far on the direct impact of microcredit on maternal health, it can be assumed that an overall improvement of access to medical services reduces maternal mortality as well. A study of the Morgan State University, for example, suggests that microcredit has a positive effect on the prevalence of contraceptives which leads to a decrease of unwanted pregnancies and therefore reduces maternal death.

6. Develop a global Partnership for Development The eight MDG is about the means to achieve the other seven MDGs. It calls for all players involved in the endeavor of development and poverty eradication to work as partners in a global context.

53

Limitation of Government Schemes/Rural Banks

In India, numerous government schemes have tried to provide various subsidized services to the poor households. However, various studies have exposed the limitation of these programs, showing the lack of access of mainstream financial services for these poor households and their over-dependence on the local moneylenders in meeting their consumption and microenterprise demands. According to an estimate, only 16% credit usage was met by the formal sources, while the remaining 84% was met by the informal services. Despite having a wide network or rural bank branches in the country and implementation of many credit linked poverty alleviation programmes, a large number of the very poor continue to remain outside the fold of the formal banking system. Various studies also suggested that the policies, systems and procedures and the saving and loan products often did not meet the needs of the very poor. NABARD refinances the microfinance sector loans by banks, but doesnt undertake direct financing. Thus, its ability to promote innovations or establish any missing link units is very limited. Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) mainly uses the network of State Financial Corporations (SFCs) and commercial banks to extend microfinance sector loans in rural small towns. It also faces the same constraint. State

Financial Corporations (SFCs) largely concentrate on the upper end of SSIs and that too in urban areas. However, through their district branches, a small proportion of lending is done to the microfinance sector. hey Their lengthy and stringent procedures inhibit the poor.

Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) are located in rural areas, have low CD ratio but are suffering immensely from lack of skills, incentives and infrastructure support. As can be seen from above, while there is no dearth of institutions and branch network in urban and rural areas, this physical outreach does not translate into access to credit by microfinance sector producers.

However, wherever mainstream finance institutions are engaged in financing small borrowers, their experience is characterized by a number of factors. Their institutional design and mandate, which determines their procedures, do not suit the poor. The poor find their procedures cumbersome, complicated and unsuitable for the local environment.. They have also failed to provide a mix of credit for both consumption and productive loans. Therefore poor feel alienated in dealing with them. They feel scared to go to them. Repeat loans, except 54

for crop production are rare, even for the borrowers who have repaid fully. Further, even though the many of the loans extended to the poor by the public sector financial institutions are subsidized, their ultimate cost to the borrowers is high which includes payments to the middle men, wage and business loss due to time spent in getting the loans approved.

55

PRESENT SCENARIO

Most MFIs in India since the beginning of 1990 have been adopting the Joint Liability Model. In the Indian context, microfinance is more inclined towards providing micro-credit to the financially excluded population. Micro-credit has been largely directed by the non-profit sector, but the emergence of for-profit Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) provided the much needed impetus to the industry. NBFCs are regulated by the Reserve Bank of India; regulations currently do not allow most MFI NBFCs to accept savings deposits.

In India microfinance is delivered by two primary channels called the Self-Help-Groups (SHGs) and MFIs. As f March 2008, the total credit disbursement has been Rs 22,000 crore (~USD 4.4 bn) through two primary channels the SHG-Bank Linkage channel (75%) and the MFI channel (25%). This represents less than10% of the total demand of Rs 250,000 crores. The Reserve Bank of India estimates that about 50% of the Indian population is still unbanked. There is no centralized database on the number of MFIs that operate in India. Estimates have put it anywhere between 800 and 1,200. New institutions are being set up at a rapid pace. These institutions look to exploit the market opportunities available for providing loans to small clients. However, the success of these institutions depends a lot on managerial commitment, critical mass, balanced approach, etc., to achieve the double bottom line of financial sustainability and socially relevant engagement.

Top 5 MFIs by outreach and loan portfolio By clients SKS Share microfin Spandana Bandhan Asmita No. (million) 1.88 1.29 1.19 0.76 0.7 By loan O/S SKS Spandana Share microfin SKDRDP Asmita Rs. (million) 7818 7285 5953 3370 3360

56

Market share of different form of MFIs Legal form NBFC Sec 25 company Society Trust Others No. 25 22 104 21 34 Share(loan portfolio) % 59.7% 11.6% 18.8% 6.8% 3.1%

Most of the large MFIs were typically NBFCs, the smaller MFIs were either socities or trusts. The growth ratehas been the highest in the case of medium-sized MFIs with a portfolio of Rs 5 crore to 50 crore.

57

Investment Climate
Equity investments in microfinance have been growing quickly in recent years and there are now 24specialized microfinance equity funds globally. Despite the global economic slowdown many funds and private equity players have expressed interest and in fact invested in the microfinance sector. The reasons for the trend are many. A large clientele of MFIs in the country is now being seen as that section of the society which is largely insulated from the ripples of economic slowdown.

58

CHAPTER -6
RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Greater legitimacy, accountability and transparency will not only enable MFIs to source adequate debt and equity funds, but could eventually enable MFIs to take and use savings as a low cost source for on-lending.

2. There is a need to recognize a separate category of Microfinance Non Banking Finance Companies (MFNBFCs), without any relaxation on start-up capital and subject to the regulatory prescriptions applicable for NBFCs. Such MF-NBFCs could be defined as companies that provide thrift, credit, micro-insurance, remittances and other financial services up to a specified amount to the poor in rural, semi-urban and urban areas.

3. To ensure that this provision is used by NBFCs which are focused on providing microfinance to the poor, it should be specified that at least 80% of the assets of MF-NBFCs should be in the form of microcredit of upto Rs. 50,000 for agriculture, allied and non farm activities and in case of housing, loans upto Rs. 1,50,000, per individual borrower, whether given through a group mechanism or directly.

4. The absence of Prudential Norms for this sector despite them performing similar functions as the Banking sector of the country. Such norms are highly essential to regulate this sector, to give it a formal recognition.

5. In addition, given the potential of this sector private sector participation should be encouraged which can further organize and cushion it through financial assistance.

6. The MFIs and NGOs engaged in providing these services must be permitted to accept deposits so that they can become self sufficient and mobilize these deposits into loans. This will reduce their dependence and make them more efficient, this in turn can enable them to charge lower interest rates as well. 59

CHAPTER 7 BIBLIOGRAPHY

y www.google.com y www.microfinancegateway.com y www.indiamicrofinance.com y www.accion.org y www.grameen-info.org y www.rbi.org y Sa-dhan (2009) Bharat Microfinance Report Viewed on 18 October 2009 (http://www.indiamicrofinance.com/microfinance/microfinance-india/thebharat-microfinancereport- quick-data-2009.html) y www.nabard.org y www.microfinanceregulationcentre.org y www.bandhanmf.com y Articles from, The Times of India and Hindustan Times.

60

You might also like