3
What does it mean?
•The 2006 revaluation indicated that significant shifts had takenplace inthe relative values of properties in TOWH since the 1999 revaluation:
–
Value of personal property and motor vehicles had grown relatively little
–
Value of commercial properties had not grown as much as residential
–
Within the residential segment, some properties had grown in valuesignificantly more than others
•The magnitude of these shifts was due, in large part, to the 7-yearhiatus since the previous revaluation –due to a similar deferralenacted by the State of CT in 2003.•The 2007 decisions to 1) uniformly increase the assessed value of allreal estate by 25% and 2) phase in the revaluation over 4 additionalyears prolongs the inequities identified by the 2006 revaluation– extending the period in which property owners pay more -or less -thanthe amount they should under CT statutes.•WH property values have dropped marginally since the 2006revaluation but the decrease has been evident in both the residentialand commercial segments -meaning the 2006 Grand List is still themost accurate reflection of property values available.
Add a Comment