Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Artemio Guzman-Rodriguez, A200 234 211 (BIA Aug. 23, 2013)

Artemio Guzman-Rodriguez, A200 234 211 (BIA Aug. 23, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 365|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case "in an abundance of caution" because the Immigration Judge did not further question the respondent after he expressed a fear of returning to Mexico because of past physical harm suffered at the hands of criminals. The decision was written by Member Edward Grant.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case "in an abundance of caution" because the Immigration Judge did not further question the respondent after he expressed a fear of returning to Mexico because of past physical harm suffered at the hands of criminals. The decision was written by Member Edward Grant.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Aug 28, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/11/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Alexander, Sharon D Esq.11
O
East State Street Ste 16Kennett Square, PA 19348
   
Executiv O r Immigraton Rviw
Board of Immigration AppealsOJ/ce of he Clek
5
lesb1rg Pik. S1t'
!
Fa� Chch Vini
N I
OHS/ICE ffice of Chief Counsel
BAL31 Hopkins Plaza Room 1600Baltimore, MD 21201Name: GUZMAN-RDRIGUEZ, ARTEMIA 200234211Date of this notice8/23/2013
Enclosd is a copy of t Board's dcision and ordr in th abov-rrncd case.nclosur
 MbG, Edwd R
Sincrely,
D
C

Donn Crr Ci Clrk
 k
Cite as: Artemio Guzman-Rodriguez, A200 234 211 (BIA Aug. 23, 2013)
 
GUMAN-RDRIGUE ARTEMIA200-234-211WCDC5022 JYNER RDSNW HILL, MD 21863
   
xcuiv c r mmigraio Rviw
B figin AppelsOce f he Cle
507 hK P Su :woo /·"als C'r, Vina JO. I
OHS/ICE c of Chf Cousl
BAL31 Hopks Plaza Room 1600Baltmor MD 21201am GUMANRDRIGUE ARTEMIA 200-234-211Dat of ths otc: 8/23/2013
cosd is a copy o h Boards dcisio i h abovrrcd cas This copy is bigprovidd o you as a coursy. Your aory or rprsaiv has b srvd wih hisdcision pursuan o
8
FR § 12925(a)  h aachd dcision ordrs ha you brmovd om h Uid Sas or arms a Immigraio Judgs dcisio ordrig ha youb rmovd ay piio r rviw o h aachd dcisio mus b ld wih and rcivdby h appropria cour o appals wihi
3
days o h da o h dcisioclosur
 MbG Edwd R
Sicrly
D
O
C
W
Doa arr hi lrk
; c
1
V.'
�A
m:
Dcket
Cite as: Artemio Guzman-Rodriguez, A200 234 211 (BIA Aug. 23, 2013)
 
US Dp  Ju
Executive Oce r Imgaion ReviewDecision of the Board ofmigation AppealsFals Church,
Virginia
22041
Fie:A200 234 21 -Baltimore MDIn re ARTEMIO GUZMANROG
I
REMOVAL PROCEGSAPEALate:ON BEHAL OF RESPONENTSharon . Alexder EsquireON BEHALF O HS:Ma C LeeAssistant Chief Counsel
AUG  3

he respodent, a native and citizen of exico ha appeaed om the Immigration Judge'sdecision dated arch 9 203 We review uestions of aw discretion and judgment arising inappeas om decisions ofmmigration Judges de novo whereas we review ndings of ctin suchappeas under a cearly erroneous" standard
See 8
C.R.
§
003. (d)(3)On appeal the respondet expresses a ar of re to Mexico because of past physica ha hesuered at the hands of crminals there At his heing bere the Immiation Judge therespondent who wa actig pro se did not express any such fear when aked why he did not wat tore to Mexico (Tr. at 011 ) However he had preiousy testied that he had e Mexico r eited States because teres a lot of violence and eres ot much work (Tr at
6).
 TeImmigraton Judge did ot question the respond
as to any fe of ha i Mexico I  abundance of caution we wil reand the record to w the pro se respondent opportuity topreset a caim r aylum or other relief under the Act
Cite as: Artemio Guzman-Rodriguez, A200 234 211 (BIA Aug. 23, 2013)

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->