Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ :ﻣﺠﺎﻫﺪ ﻓﻲ ﷲ
ﷲِ ْﺍﻟ َﻜ ِﺬ َ
ﺏ ﻻَ ﻳُ ْﻔﻠِﺤ َ
ُﻮﻥ )ﻳﻮﻧﺲ ( 69 : ُﻭﻥ َﻋﻠَﻰ ّ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ " ﻗُﻞْ ﺇِ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ
ﻳﻦ ﻳَ ْﻔﺘَﺮ َ
ﻭﻻﺣﻈﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺤﻲ ﺭﻗﻢ -1-ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﻲ
ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﻭﷲ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﻜﻠﻤﺖ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺫﻛﺮﻭﻩ ﻟﻲ ﺑﺎﻹﺳﻢ !
ﻓﻬﻠﻢ ﻧﺮﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﻋﻠﻤﺎء ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﺏ
ﻭﺗﺮﺟﻤﺖ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺳﺄﺳﻮﻗﻬﺎ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ 10ﻟﻐﺎﺕ!!...
ﻣﻠﺤﻮﻅﺔ -1 :ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﺻﻔﺤﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺧﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺇﻛﺬﻭﺑﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺛﻨﺘﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﺠﺮﺩ ﺃﺣﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎﻓﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻻ
ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﻛﺬﻭﺑﺔ ﻓﺎﻟﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺷﺊ ﻳﺨﺪﻡ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻹﻁﻼﻕ ﺑﻞ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ﺿﺪﻩ!
-2ﺇﻧﻨﻲ ﻟﻦ ﺃﻫﺘﻢ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻴﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻔﻨﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻭﻻ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺿﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﺮ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺊ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ ﻭﻗﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻄﻮﻻﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﻓﻠﺴﻔﺎﺕ ﻭﻧﺼﻮﺹ
ﺍء ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻭﻭﷲ ﺗﺎہﻠﻟ ﻷﺟﻌﻠﻨﻪ ﻋﺒﺮﺓ ﻟﻤﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﺒﺮ !
ﻭﺇﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺎﻷﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺤﺔ !
ﻭﻟﻦ ﺃﻫﺘﻢ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺠﻬﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺠﻬﺎﻻﺕ ﺳﻮﺍء ﺑﺪﻳﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﻭﻟﻬﺎ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﻩ!
-3ﻟﻦ ﺃﺳﻤﻴﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻓﻲ ﻛﻼﻣﻲ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻏﻠﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺳﻤﻪ
ﻓﺄﺭﺟﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ.
%90 -5ﻣﻤﺎ ﺟﺎء ﻓﻲ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺗﻪ "ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻹﻳﻤﺎﻥ" ﻫﻲ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻧﺼﻲ ﻟﻜﺘﺒﻪ
ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺳﺄﺧﺮﺝ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ..ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺴﻴﻔﺘﻀﺢ ﻭﺳﻴﻔﺘﻀﺢ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺤﺎﻭﻝ ﻧﺸﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺬﺏ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺃﺳﺘﺎﺫﻩ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﻭ" ...ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﺟﻼ ﻓﻠﻴﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺳﺄﻛﺘﺒﻬﺎ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ ﺭﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ –ﻫﺒﺎﻻﺗﻪ"! -
ﻟﺤﻤﺪ ہﻠﻟ ﻗﺪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﻮﺕ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻓﺎﻕ
ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺫﺏ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻓﻀﺢ ﺃﻥ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ
ﺑﺎﻷﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ!!
-1 -
ﺃﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ "ﷲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻓﻲ ﺛﺎﻟﻮﺙ"
ﷲِ ﻟَ ﱠﻤﺎ َﺟﺎءﻧِ َﻲ ﺍ ْﻟﺒَﻴﱢﻨَﺎﺕُ ِﻣﻦ
ُﻭﻥ ﱠ
ُﻮﻥ ِﻣﻦ ﺩ ِ ﻳﻦ ﺗَ ْﺪﻋ َ ﻗُ ْﻞ ﺇِﻧﱢﻲ ﻧُ ِﻬﻴﺖُ ﺃَﻥْ ﺃَ ْﻋﺒُ َﺪ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ
ﻴﻦ )ﻏﺎﻓﺮ ( 66 : ﱠﺭﺑﱢﻲ َﻭﺃُ ِﻣ ْﺮﺕُ ﺃَﻥْ ﺃُ ْ
ﺳﻠِ َﻢ ﻟِ َﺮ ﱢﺏ ﺍ ْﻟ َﻌﺎﻟَ ِﻤ َ
-1ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ :ﺃﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ "ﺃﻧﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ" ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ
ﻟﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﺒﻴﺪﻩ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻧﺴﺦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ "ﺃﻧﺎ ﺛﺎﻟﻮﺙ ﻭ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻗﺎﻧﻴﻢ" ﻭﻫﻮ ﻫﻮ
ﻧﻔﺲ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ "ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ" ﻟﻴﻨﻜﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻧﺴﺦ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎﻻ ﻳﺠﻮﺯ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ
ﺇﻻ ﻛﺬﺑﺎ ﻭﻁﻌﻨﺎ ﻓﻲ ﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ.. .ﻓﻤﺎﻝ ﻫﺆﻻء ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻜﺎﺩﻭﻥ ﻳﻔﻘﻬﻮﻥ
ﺣﺪﻳﺜﺎ ؟! ..ﺛﻢ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻧﺼﻮﺹ ﻟﻠﺘﺜﻠﻴﺚ ﻻ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻭﻻ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺇﻟﻮﻫﻴﻢ ..ﻭﻧﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ..ﻭﻣﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﺛﻰ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻧﻪ "ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺍﺕ" ﻭﻧﺺ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻠﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻓﻲ ﻳﻮﺣﻨﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ ﺇﺻﺤﺎﺡ 5ﻋﺪﺩ
7ﻣﻠﻔﻖ ﺑﺈﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻋﻠﻤﺎء ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺘﺒﺮﻳﻦ ﺃﺟﻤﻌﻴﻦ –ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺄﺗﻲ -ﻭﻟﻢ ﺗﺮﺩ
ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺛﺎﻟﻮﺙ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻭﻻ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺃﻗﺎﻧﻴﻢ ﻭﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺑﻬﻢ ﺻﻠﺐ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻬﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﷲ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﺛﺎﻟﻮﺙ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﻮﺣﻲ ﻟﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺕ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ
ﺃﻧﻪ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻟﺬﻛﺎﺋﻬﻢ !!
-2ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻤﺮ ﻗﺎﺭﺋﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﺴﺘﺸﻬﺪ ﻟﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻠﻢ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻛﺠﺴﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﻛﺄﻁﻔﺎﻝ...ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻔﺘﺮﺽ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺘﻪ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻮﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻷﻁﻔﺎﻝ ﻓﻤﺘﻰ ﺟﺎء ﺍﻟﻨﻀﺞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ
ﺟﻬﻞ؟
ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﺉ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺤﻲ ﻟﻴﻤﻸ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺏ ﺑﺼﺎﻗﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺣﺬﻓﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻣﺜﻞ ISV, ESV,ASV
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺘﺮﻣﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺣﺬﻓﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻧﺪﺍﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺧﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻝkjv
ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺟﻠﻜﺮ ﺍﻳﺴﺖ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﺣﻤﺪ
ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺕ"ﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﷲ" ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺸﻚ ﻓﻲ ﺇﻧﺘﻤﺎﺋﻪ
ﻭﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺼﻪ:
) 3ﺍﻟﻤﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺕ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺻﺤﱠﺤﺘﻬﺎ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ
،RSVﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻘ ّﺮ ﺑﻪ .ﻓﻔﻲ 1ﻳﻮﺣﻨﺎ 5:7ﻓﻲ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ KJVﻧﺠﺪ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺗﺤ ﱢﺪﺩ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻵﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺱ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺣُﺬﻓﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ
ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻗﺪ ُﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﺃﻭﻻً ﻛﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻫﺎﻣﺸﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ .RSVﻭﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﱠ
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ ،ﺛﻢ ﻭﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﺄ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺮﻫﺎ ﻧُﺴﱠﺎﺥ ﺍﻹﻧﺠﻴﻞ ﻓﻲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻻﺣﻖ
ﺟﺰءﺍً ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻲ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣُﺬﻓﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺜﺔ،
ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﻗِ َﺪﻣﺎ ً ﻻ ﺗﻮﺭﺩ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ".ﺻﻔﺤﺔ .16 ﱠ
ﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺎﻕ ﻳﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺏ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ہﻠﻟ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻘﻠﻪ ؟ّ!
ﺍﻟﻴﻚ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﻟﻠﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻘﻠﻢ ﺟﻮﻥ ﺳﺘﻮﻥ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺤﺮﻑ :
"ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺑﺎﻛﻤﻠﻪ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺑﺮﻳﻖ ﻭ ﻟﻤﻌﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻳﺸﺒﻬﻬﺎ ﻓﻰ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻻﺭﺽ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ ﻭ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﺑﻠﻤﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍءﺓ ﺍﻧﻬﺎ ﻻ
ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭ ﻳﺴﺠﻞ ﺍﺩﻟﺔ ﻓﻰ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﺻﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻔﺒﺮﻛﺔ
....ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻻ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻯ ﻣﺨﻄﻮﻁﺔ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻣﺲ
ﻋﺸﺮ ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﻅﻬﺮﺕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻅﻬﺮﺕ ﻓﻰ ﻣﺨﻄﻮﻁﺔ ﻻﺗﻴﻨﻴﺔ
ﻣﻐﻤﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻨﺘﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺛﻢ ﺍﺧﺬﺕ ﻁﺮﻳﻘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺨﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺘﻤﺪﺓ ﻭ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻥ ﺿﻤﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺯﻣﺲ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻟﻨﺴﺨﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺮﺩﺩ .ﻭ ﻻ ﺷﻚ
ﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺗﺐ ﺗﺎﺛﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﻠﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﻮﺙ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺡ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺜﻠﺜﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﺍﻳﻀﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻥ ﺗﺤﺸﻴﺘﻪ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﺔ
ﻓﺎﻻﻧﺠﻴﻞ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻥ ﺍﻻﺏ ﻭ ﺍﻻﺑﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺱ ﻳﺸﻬﺪﻭﻥ ﺟﻤﻴﻌﺎ ﻟﻼﺑﻦ ﻭ
ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻥ ﺍﻻﺏ ﻳﺸﻬﺪ ﻟﻼﺑﻦ ﻋﻦ ﻁﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺱ " ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺺ
ﺻﻔﺤﺔ . 141
ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﺖ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﻗﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻄﻮﻻﺕ ﻣﻊ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺓ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ ﻭﻧﺤﻦ ﻓﻲ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻻ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﺎ !
ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻟﻴﺒﺼﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺤﻲ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ
ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻌﺠﺒﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻔﻴﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﺇﻗﺘﻄﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ﻭﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ
ﻓﻲ ﺃﺧﺮ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻟﻢ ﺗﺮﻕ ﻟﻪ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ !
ﻳﻦ ﻅَﻠَ ُﻤﻮﺍﺏ ﺇِ ﱠﻻ ﺑِﺎﻟﱠﺘِﻲ ِﻫ َﻲ ﺃَﺣْ َﺴ ُﻦ ﺇِ ﱠﻻ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ ﻓﺎﻵﻳﺔ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ " َﻭ َﻻ ﺗُ َﺠﺎ ِﺩﻟُﻮﺍ ﺃَ ْﻫ َﻞ ْﺍﻟ ِﻜﺘَﺎ ِ
ُ ُ
ﻧﺰ َﻝ ﺇِﻟَ ْﻴ ُﻜ ْﻢ َﻭﺇِﻟَﻬُﻨَﺎ َﻭﺇِﻟَﻬُ ُﻜ ْﻢ َﻭ ِ
ﺍﺣ ٌﺪ َﻭﻧَﺤْ ُﻦ ﻟَﻪُ ِﻣ ْﻨﻬُ ْﻢ َﻭﻗُﻮﻟُﻮﺍ ﺁ َﻣﻨﱠﺎ ﺑِﺎﻟﱠ ِﺬﻱ ﺃ ِ
ﻧﺰ َﻝ ﺇِﻟَ ْﻴﻨَﺎ َﻭﺃ ِ
ﻮﻥ )ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻜﺒﻮﺕ ( 46 : ُﻣ ْﺴﻠِ ُﻤ َ
ﻭﻛﺄﻧﻤﺎ ﻳﺨﺘﺒﺮﻧﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻨﺎ "ﺃﻛﻤﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺎﻁ" ﻭﷲ ﺫﻛﺮﺗﻨﺎ
ﺑﺄﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻹﺑﺘﺪﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ !
ﻓﻘﻂ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﻮﺩﻧﺎ ﻧﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﻧﻘﺮﺁ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻟﻨﻤﻸ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺎﻕ !
ُﻭﻑ َﻭﺗَ ْﻨﻬَ ْﻮ َﻥ َﻋ ِﻦ ُﻭﻥ ﺑِ ْﺎﻟ َﻤ ْﻌﺮ ِ ﺎﺱ ﺗَﺄْ ُﻣﺮ َ ﺖ ﻟِﻠﻨﱠ ِ ﻭﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ " ُﻛﻨﺘُ ْﻢ َﺧ ْﻴ َﺮ ﺃُ ﱠﻣ ٍﺔ ﺃُ ْﺧ ِﺮ َﺟ ْ
ﺎﻥ َﺧﻴْﺮﺍً ﻟﱠﻬُﻢ ﱢﻣ ْﻨﻬُ ُﻢ ْﺍﻟ ُﻤ ْﺆ ِﻣﻨُ َ
ﻮﻥ ﺏ ﻟَ َﻜ َ ْﻤُﻨﻜَﺮِ ﻭَﺗُﺆْﻣِﻨُﻮﻥَ ﺑِﺎہﻠﻟِ َﻭﻟَ ْﻮ ﺁ َﻣ َﻦ ﺃَ ْﻫ ُﻞ ْﺍﻟ ِﻜﺘَﺎ ِ
ّ
ﻮﻥ} {110ﻟَﻦ ﻳَﻀُﺮﱡ ﻭ ُﻛ ْﻢ ﺇِﻻﱠ ﺃَ ًﺫﻯ َﻭﺇِﻥ ﻳُﻘَﺎﺗِﻠُﻮ ُﻛ ْﻢ ﻳُ َﻮﻟﱡﻮ ُﻛ ُﻢ ﺍﻷَ ُﺩﺑَﺎ َﺭ ﺎﺳﻘُ ََﻭﺃَ ْﻛﺜَ ُﺮﻫُ ُﻢ ْﺍﻟﻔَ ِ
ﷲِﻮﺍ ﺇِﻻﱠ ﺑِ َﺤﺒ ٍْﻞ ﱢﻣ ْﻦ ّ ﺖ َﻋﻠَ ْﻴ ِﻬ ُﻢ ﺍﻟ ﱢﺬﻟﱠﺔُ ﺃَﻳ َْﻦ َﻣﺎ ﺛُﻘِﻔُ ْ ُﺮﺑَ ْ
ُﻭﻥ} {111ﺿ ِ ﺼﺮ َ ﺛُ ﱠﻢ ﻻَ ﻳُﻨ َ
ﻚ ﺑِﺄَﻧﱠﻬُ ْﻢ ﺖ َﻋﻠَ ْﻴ ِﻬ ُﻢ ْﺍﻟ َﻤ ْﺴ َﻜﻨَﺔُ َﺫﻟِ َ ُﺮﺑَ ْ
ﷲِ َﻭﺿ ِ ﺐ ﱢﻣ َﻦ ّ ﻀ ٍ ﺎﺱ َﻭﺑَﺂ ُﺅﻭﺍ ﺑِ َﻐ َ َﻭ َﺣﺒ ٍْﻞ ﱢﻣ َﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﱠ ِ
ﺼﻮﺍ ﱠﻭ َﻛﺎﻧُ ْ
ﻮﺍ ﻚ ﺑِ َﻤﺎ َﻋ َ ﻖ َﺫﻟِ َ ﻮﻥ ﺍﻷَﻧﺒِﻴَﺎ َء ﺑِ َﻐﻴ ِْﺮ َﺣ ﱟ ﷲِ َﻭﻳَ ْﻘﺘُﻠُ َ ﺕ ّ ُﻭﻥ ﺑِﺂﻳَﺎ ِﻮﺍ ﻳَ ْﻜﻔُﺮ َ َﻛﺎﻧُ ْ
ﷲِ ﺁﻧَﺎء ﺕ ّ ﻮﻥ ﺁﻳَﺎ ِ ﺏ ﺃُ ﱠﻣﺔٌ ﻗَﺂﺋِ َﻤﺔٌ ﻳَ ْﺘﻠُ َ ُﻮﺍ َﺳ َﻮﺍء ﱢﻣ ْﻦ ﺃَ ْﻫ ِﻞ ْﺍﻟ ِﻜﺘَﺎ ِ ﻭﻥ} {112ﻟَ ْﻴﺴ ْ ﻳَ ْﻌﺘَ ُﺪ َ
ُﻭﻥ ﺑِ ْﺎﻟ َﻤ ْﻌﺮ ِ
ُﻭﻑ ﺍﻵﺧ ِﺮ َﻭﻳَﺄْ ُﻣﺮ َ ﺆْﻣِﻨُﻮﻥَ ﺑِﺎہﻠﻟِ َﻭ ْﺍﻟﻴَ ْﻮ ِﻡ ِ
ّ ﻭﻥ} {113 ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻴ ِْﻞ َﻭﻫُ ْﻢ ﻳَ ْﺴ ُﺠ ُﺪ َ
ﻴﻦ} {114 ﻚ ِﻣ َﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﱠﺎﻟِ ِﺤ َ ﺕ َﻭﺃُ ْﻭﻟَـﺌِ َﻮﻥ ﻓِﻲ ْﺍﻟ َﺨ ْﻴ َﺮﺍ ِ ﺎﺭ ُﻋ َ َﻭﻳَ ْﻨﻬَ ْﻮ َﻥ َﻋ ِﻦ ْﺍﻟ ُﻤﻨ َﻜ ِﺮ َﻭﻳُ َﺴ ِ
ﻳﻦ َﻛﻔَﺮ ْ
ُﻭﺍ ﻴﻦ} {115ﺇِ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ ﷲُ َﻋﻠِﻴ ٌﻢ ﺑِ ْﺎﻟ ُﻤﺘﱠﻘِ َ ﻮﺍ ِﻣ ْﻦ َﺧﻴ ٍْﺮ ﻓَﻠَﻦ ﻳُ ْﻜﻔَﺮ ُْﻭﻩُ َﻭ ّ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﻳَ ْﻔ َﻌﻠُ ْ
ﺎﺭ ﻫُ ْﻢﻚ ﺃَﺻْ َﺤﺎﺏُ ﺍﻟﻨﱠ ِ ﷲِ َﺷﻴْﺌﺎ ً َﻭﺃُ ْﻭﻟَـﺌِ َ ﻟَﻦ ﺗُ ْﻐﻨِ َﻲ َﻋ ْﻨﻬُ ْﻢ ﺃَ ْﻣ َﻮﺍﻟُﻬُ ْﻢ َﻭﻻَ ﺃَ ْﻭﻻَ ُﺩﻫُﻢ ﱢﻣ َﻦ ّ
ﻭﻥ} ) {116ﺁﻝ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ( ﻓِﻴﻬَﺎ َﺧﺎﻟِ ُﺪ َ
ﻓﺈﻗﺘﻄﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻷﺷﺮ ﺟﺰءﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻭﻧﺴﻲ ﺃﻭﻟﻬﺎ ﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺨﺪﻣﻪ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ
ﺕ ّ
ﷲِ ﺁﻧَﺎء ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻴ ِْﻞ َﻭﻫُ ْﻢ ﺏ ﺃُ ﱠﻣﺔٌ ﻗَﺂﺋِ َﻤﺔٌ ﻳَ ْﺘﻠُ َ
ﻮﻥ ﺁﻳَﺎ ِ ُﻮﺍ َﺳ َﻮﺍء ﱢﻣ ْﻦ ﺃَ ْﻫ ِﻞ ْﺍﻟ ِﻜﺘَﺎ ِ
"ﻟَ ْﻴﺴ ْ
ﻭﻥ )ﺁﻝ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ( 113 : ﻳَ ْﺴ ُﺠ ُﺪ َ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﻧﺠﺎﺣﺎ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﻧﺠﺎﺣﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺳﺬﺝ ﻭﻋﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ
ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻤﺮﻫﻢ ﺑﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻹﻗﺘﺒﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺒﺘﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻌﻮﺩﻭﺍ ﺳﺬﺟﺎ ﻭﺳﻨﻔﻀﺤﻪ
ﻭﺳﻴﺒﺼﻘﻮﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﻭﺳﻴﺘﺮﻛﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺏ ﻭﺃﺗﺒﺎﻋﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺑﻴﻦ
ﻭﻳﺪﺧﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ !
ﻻ ....ﺑﻞ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻧﻚ ﻻ ﺗﺪﺭﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻳﻨﻘﻠﻮﻥ ﻭﺭﺍﺋﻚ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻳﺼﺪﻣﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻚ ﺻﺪﻣﺔ ﻛﺒﻴﺮﺓ ..ﻓﺎﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻫﻲ
ﻮﺍ َﻭﻟَﺘَ ِﺠ َﺪ ﱠﻥ ﺃَ ْﻗ َﺮﺑَﻬُ ْﻢ
ﻳﻦ ﺃَ ْﺷ َﺮ ُﻛ ْ
ﻮﺍ ْﺍﻟﻴَﻬُﻮ َﺩ َﻭﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َﻳﻦ ﺁ َﻣﻨُ ْﺎﺱ َﻋ َﺪﺍ َﻭﺓً ﻟﱢﻠﱠ ِﺬ َﻟَﺘَ ِﺠ َﺪ ﱠﻥ ﺃَ َﺷ ﱠﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﱠ ِ
ﻴﻦ َﻭ ُﺭ ْﻫﺒَﺎﻧﺎ ً
ﱢﻴﺴ َﻚ ﺑِﺄ َ ﱠﻥ ِﻣ ْﻨﻬُ ْﻢ ﻗِﺴ ِﺼﺎ َﺭﻯ َﺫﻟِ َ ﻳﻦ ﻗَﺎﻟُ َﻮ ْﺍ ﺇِﻧﱠﺎ ﻧَ َ ﻳﻦ ﺁ َﻣﻨُ ْ
ﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ ﱠﻣ َﻮ ﱠﺩﺓً ﻟﱢﻠﱠ ِﺬ َ
ُﻮﻝ ﺗَ َﺮﻯ ﺃَ ْﻋﻴُﻨَﻬُ ْﻢ ﻧﺰ َﻝ ﺇِﻟَﻰ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮﺳ ِ ُﻭﻥ ) َ (82ﻭﺇِ َﺫﺍ َﺳ ِﻤﻌ ْ ُ َﻭﺃَﻧﱠﻬُ ْﻢ ﻻَ ﻳَ ْﺴﺘَ ْﻜﺒِﺮ َ
ُﻮﺍ َﻣﺎ ﺃ ِ
ﻮﻥ َﺭﺑﱠﻨَﺎ ﺁ َﻣﻨﱠﺎ ﻓَﺎ ْﻛﺘُ ْﺒﻨَﺎ َﻣ َﻊ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺸﺎ ِﻫ ِﺪ َ
ﻳﻦ ﻖ ﻳَﻘُﻮﻟُ َ ﻮﺍ ِﻣ َﻦ ْﺍﻟ َﺤ ﱢﺗَﻔِﻴﺾُ ِﻣ َﻦ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪ ْﻣ ِﻊ ِﻣ ﱠﻤﺎ َﻋ َﺮﻓُ ْ
ﻄ َﻤ ُﻊ ﺃَﻥ ﻳُ ْﺪ ِﺧﻠَﻨَﺎ َﺭﺑﱠﻨَﺎ َﻣ َﻊ ﻖ َﻭﻧَ ْ ﺎ ﻻَ ﻧُﺆْﻣِﻦُ ﺑِﺎہﻠﻟِ َﻭ َﻣﺎ َﺟﺎءﻧَﺎ ِﻣ َﻦ ْﺍﻟ َﺤ ﱢ
ّ ) َ (83ﻣﺎ ﻟَﻨَ
ﺕ ﺗَﺠْ ِﺮﻱ ِﻣﻦ ﺗَﺤْ ﺘِﻬَﺎ ﺍﻷَ ْﻧﻬَﺎ ُﺭ ﻮﺍ َﺟﻨﱠﺎ ٍ ﷲُ ﺑِ َﻤﺎ ﻗَﺎﻟُ ْﻴﻦ ) (84ﻓَﺄَﺛَﺎﺑَﻬُ ُﻢ ّ ْﺍﻟﻘَ ْﻮ ِﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﱠﺎﻟِ ِﺤ َ
ُﻮﺍ ﺑِﺂﻳَﺎﺗِﻨَﺎ ﺃُ ْﻭﻟَـﺌِ َ
ﻚ ُﻭﺍ َﻭ َﻛ ﱠﺬﺑ ْ
ﻳﻦ َﻛﻔَﺮ ْ ﻴﻦ ) َ (85ﻭﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ ﻚ َﺟ َﺰﺍء ْﺍﻟ ُﻤﺤْ ِﺴﻨِ َ ﻳﻦ ﻓِﻴﻬَﺎ َﻭ َﺫﻟِ َ َﺧﺎﻟِ ِﺪ َ
ﺃَﺻْ َﺤﺎﺏُ ْﺍﻟ َﺠ ِﺤ ِﻴﻢ ) (86ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺋﺪﺓ
ﻭﻫﻲ ﺷﺒﻬﺔ ﺑﻬﻠﻮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻁﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﺳﺄﺭﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻠﻴﺎ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺐ
ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﺔ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﻱ
ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺐ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺼﻞ ﻹﻟﻮﻫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ..ﻭﺍﻷﻏﺮﺏ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺘﺮﺟﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﻝ ﺩﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻴﻔﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﺑﻪ ....ﻭﺍﻷﻏﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺠﻌﻠﻚ
ﺗﺪﺭﻙ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﺳﺘﺤﻤﺮ ﻭﺇﺳﺘﻐﺒﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻳﻪ ﻭﻗﺎﺭﺋﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻳﻨﺸﺮ ﻓﻲ
ﺟﺮﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻫﺮﺍﻡ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﺷﻬﺮ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﺇﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍ ...ﻭﺍﻷﻏﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﺪ
ﻋﺠﺒﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻤﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﺘﺸﻒ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻘﻨﻘﻴﺮﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻫﻮ ﷲ ﺑﻜﻞ
ﻫﺪﻭء ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺇﻻ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ !
ﺃﻱ ﺃﺳﺘﻬﺰﺍء ﺑﻌﻘﻮﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ..؟
ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻚ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﻌﻴﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﺋﻢ ﻻ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ..ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ !
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻔﻜﺮ ﺳﻴﻤﻸ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺼﺎﻗﺎ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ !
ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ))} ﺑِ َﻜﻠِ َﻤ ٍﺔ ّﻣ َﻦ ﷲ { ﺃﻱ ﺑﻌﻴﺴﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ
ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﺳﻤﻲ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻭﺟﺪ ﺑﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻛﺎﺋﻨﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻫﻮ ﺃﻭ ُﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ
((
ﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻧﺼﻒ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻄﺔ ﻭﻟﻜﻲ ﻻ ﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﺪﻣﺮ ﻛﻞ
ﺩﻻﺋﻠﻪ ..ﻓﻀﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺤﺬﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺠﺰء ﻟﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻀﻠﻠﻴﻦ !
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻄﺮﺳﻜﻢ !!
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ )) -ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﺤﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ،ﺇﺫ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻫﻲ ﷲ ﻣﺘﺠﻠﻴﺎ ً . . .ﻭﻫﻲ
ﻋﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﺍﻹﻟﻬﻴﺔ ﻻ ﻏﻴﺮﻫﺎ ) .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻓﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺠﺰء ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ ﺻﻔﺤﺔ
.(35
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ )) -3ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻣﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻴﻪ:
"ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺱ ﻫﻮ ﺭﻭﺡ ﷲ")ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﻣﺎﻫﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺻﻔﺤﺔ (53
ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺎء ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻧﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﻬﺎ ﻧﺤﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺤﻴﻴﻦ(( .
ﻣﻦ ...ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻣﻲ؟ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﺖ -ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺼﻞ -ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ
ﺑﻤﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻓﺔ ﺇﻁﻼﻗﺎ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﻬﺎ..ﺛﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﺇﺳﻤﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﻣﺎﻫﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮﻳﺔ..ﻭﻧﺤﻦ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﺠﻬﻮﻟﺔ
ﻭﺳﺘﻈﻞ ﻣﺠﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﺫﺍﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻲ.
ﻭﺡ ﻗُ ِﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﱡ ﻭ ُﺡ ِﻣ ْﻦ ﺃَ ْﻣ ِﺮ َﺭﺑﱢﻲ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﺃُﻭﺗِﻴﺘُﻢ ﱢﻣﻦ ْﺍﻟ ِﻌ ْﻠ ِﻢ ﺇِﻻﱠ ﻗَﻠِﻴﻼً َﻭﻳَﺴْﺄَﻟُﻮﻧَ َ
ﻚ َﻋ ِﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﱡ ِ
)ﺍﻹﺳﺮﺍء ( 85 :
ﺃﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﻢ ﻗﻠﺖ ﻟﻪ ﺇﻥ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﺠﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻴﺖ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﺎ
ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺑﻤﺎ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺋﻪ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻜﻔﺎءﺓ ﻟﺜﻮﺍﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﺴﻜﻦ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﺎ..ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺎﺓ ﻣﺠﻬﻮﻟﺔ!..ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻲ "ﻧﺤﻦ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ
ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ!....ﺇﻧﻬﺎ ﺳﺮ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺎﺓ " ...ﻓﻴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺒﺎء ﻣﻘﺪﺱ..ﺃﻱ "ﻟﻴﺘﻜﻢ
ﺗﺤﺘﻤﻠﻮﻥ ﻏﺒﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﻗﻠﻴﻼ2) .ﻛﻮ ( 1: 11ﻓﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺟﺌﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻋﺒﻘﺮﻱ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻚ؟
ﺛﻢ ﺃﺭﺟﻊ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ -ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ -ﺃﻧﺖ ﺃﺭﺩﺕ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻥ "ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺱ
ﻫﻲ ﺭﻭﺡ ﷲ" ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﻳﺮﻱ
ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻣﻲ
ﺕ ِﻣﻦ ُﺩﻭﻧِ ِﻬ ْﻢ ِﺣ َﺠﺎﺑﺎ ً ﻓَﺄَﺭْ َﺳ ْﻠﻨَﺎ ﺇِﻟَ ْﻴﻬَﺎ ُﺭ َ
ﻭﺣﻨَﺎ ﻓَﺘَ َﻤﺜﱠ َﻞ ﻟَﻬَﺎ ﺑَ َﺸﺮﺍً ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ) ﻓَﺎﺗﱠ َﺨ َﺬ ْ
َﺳ ِﻮﻳّﺎ ً )ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ( 17 :
ﻓﺠﺒﺮﻳﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺱ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺭﻭﺡ ﷲ ...ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ !
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺟﻴﺪﺍ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺣﺪﻯ ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺗﻪ "ﺭﻭﺣﻨﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ
ﻋﻨﺪﻱ"
ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺟﻴﺪﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻀﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺷﺘﺮﺍﻁﺎ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﻴﺖ ﷲ ﻭﻧﺎﻗﺔ ﷲ
ﻭﻋﺒﺪ ﷲ ..ﺇﻟﺦ
ﻭﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻳﺨﻠﻂ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺎﻁ ﻓﺘﻘﻮﻝ ﻧﺎﻫﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻲ "ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻼﻙ
ﻫﻮ ﺭﻭﺡ ﷲ؟"
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﻦ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺻﻔﺔ ہﻠﻟ ...ﻗﺪ ﺷﺮﺑﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺎﺽ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﺭﺩﻳﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻤﺖ ﻣﻦ 40ﺳﻨﺔ ﺇﺳﻼﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﻄﻖ ﺇﺳﻢ
ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻓﺘﻘﻮﻟﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻲ –ﻭﻻ ﺃﻅﻦ ﺃﻧﻲ ﺳﺄﺭﻯ-
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﺳﻢ ﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺎﻣﻴﺔ "-ﻣﺤﻤﺪ" ﺑﻔﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ-
ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻬﺎ...ﻤﻀﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺷﺘﺮﺍﻁﺎ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﻭہﻠﻟ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ
ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ )ﷲ ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻮﻡ ( ﻭﻗﺎﻝ )ﻭﺗﻮﻛﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ
ﻳﻤﻮﺕ ( ..ﺃﻓﻬﻤﺘﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺃﻡ ﺟﻬﻞ ؟
ﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﻗﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻄﻮﻻﺕ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﻤﻮﺕ
ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ !
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ "13
-3ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻗﺪﺳﻲ-:
ﺟﺎء ﻓﻲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻗﺪﺳﻲ "ﺍﻷﻏﻨﻴﺎء ﻭﻛﻼﺋﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍء ﻋﻴﺎﻟﻲ" ﺃﻱ ﺃﻭﻻﺩﻱ ﻓﻬﻞ
ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﺃﺧﺬﺍ ﺯﻭﺟﺔ ﻭﺃﻧﺠﺐ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻭﻻﺩﺍً ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍء؟ ﺣﺎﺷﺎ!"
ﻭﻓﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺔ )) -5ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻟﺠﺒﻠﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺱ
ﺃﻧﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻕ ﻭﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﻠﻮﻕ ﺃﺯﻟﻲ ﻭﺍﻷﺯﻟﻲ ﻫﻮ ﷲ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺳﻮﺍﻩ) .ﻣﺠﻠﺔ
ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻵﺩﺍﺏ ﺳﻨﺔ (( (1934
ﻭﻧﻔﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻹﻳﻤﺎﻥ –ﻓﻲ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﻬﺎ-
ﻗﺎﻝ ....ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻟﺠﺒﻠﻲ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ...ﻓﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺏ ﻋﺎﻡ
!!! ... 1934
ﺷﺊ ﻭﷲ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﻟﻠﻀﺤﻚ ..ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﻋﻠﻤﺎء ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﺪﻳﻪ ﺟﻴﺶ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺼﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺃﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﻻ ﺗﺤﺼﻰ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﻟﻠﺘﺒﺸﻴﺮ ﻭﻛﺘﺐ ﻭﺳﻴﺪﻳﻬﺎﺕ ﻭﻗﻨﺎﺓ
ﻭﻏﺮﻓﺔ ﻭﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻻ ﺗﻌﺪ ...ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻌﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻟﺠﺒﻠﻰ ...ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺃﺣﺪ!
ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻤﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻵﺩﺍﺏ !...
ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻓﺎﻟﻤﺠﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﺎﻡ .. 1934ﻭﺍﻷﻛﻴﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺘﻮﺏ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻫﻮ ﺇﺑﻦ ﷲ ﺃﻭ ﻫﻮ ﷲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺱ ﻫﻮ ﷲ ..ﻛﺎﻟﻌﺎﺩﺓ...ﻓﻴﺎﻟﻠﺴﺨﻒ
ﻭﺍﻹﺳﺘﺤﻤﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻹﺳﺘﻐﺒﺎء ﻟﻤﺸﺎﻫﺪﻳﻪ ﻭﻗﺎﺭﺋﻴﻪ ! ﻭﻫﻨﻴﺌﺎ ﻟﻜﻢ ﺑﻄﺮﺳﻜﻢ !
ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻧﺮﺍﻩ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻤﺠﻠﺔ ﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺻﻔﺤﺔ "ﺧﻤﺎﺷﺮ" ﺇﻥ
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻫﻮ ﷲ ﻭ....ﻓﺘﺸﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﻭﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻈﻨﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺸﻬﺪ ﻟﻲ !
ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻜﻔﻴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺜﻠﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻛﻼﻣﺎ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﺍ ﺳﺄﺭﺩ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻴﻨﻪ –ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ -ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﻗﺘﻄﻒ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺹ :18
))4ـ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺁﻳﺔ 73
"ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺇﻥ ﷲ ﺛﺎﻟﺚ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ".
ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﻭﻧﻔﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻳﻤﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺁﻟﻬﺔ!!!((
ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪﺍ ﻟﺘﺸﺠﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺎﻕ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻷﺷﺮ ﻓﺎﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ
ﻫﻨﺎ:
ﷲَ ﻫُ َﻮ ْﺍﻟ َﻤ ِﺴﻴ ُﺢ ﺍﺑ ُْﻦ َﻣﺮْ ﻳَ َﻢ َﻭﻗَﺎ َﻝ ْﺍﻟ َﻤ ِﺴﻴ ُﺢ ﻳَﺎ ﺑَﻨِﻲ ﺇِ ْﺳ َﺮﺍﺋِﻴ َﻞ ﻮﺍ ﺇِ ﱠﻥ ّﻳﻦ ﻗَﺎﻟُ ْ ﻟﻘَ ْﺪ َﻛﻔَ َﺮ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ
ﷲُ َﻋﻠَﻴ ِﻪ ْﺍﻟ َﺠﻨﱠﺔَ َﻭ َﻣﺄْ َﻭﺍﻩُ ﺑﱠﻜُﻢْ ﺇِﻧﱠﻪُ ﻣَﻦ ﻳُﺸْﺮِﻙْ ﺑِﺎہﻠﻟِ ﻓَﻘَ ْﺪ َﺣ ﱠﺮ َﻡ ّ
ّ ﻭﺍْ ﷲَّ ﺭَﺑﱢﻲ ﻭَﺭ
َ ْﺒُﺪُ
ﺚ ﺛَﻼَﺛَ ٍﺔ ﷲَ ﺛَﺎﻟِ ُ ﻮﺍ ﺇِ ﱠﻥ ّ ﻳﻦ ﻗَﺎﻟُ ْﺎﺭ} {72ﻟﱠﻘَ ْﺪ َﻛﻔَ َﺮ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ ﺼ ٍ ﻴﻦ ِﻣ ْﻦ ﺃَﻧ َ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎ ُﺭ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﻟِﻠﻈﱠﺎﻟِ ِﻤ َ
ُﻭﺍ ِﻣ ْﻨﻬُ ْﻢﻳﻦ َﻛﻔَﺮ ْ ﻮﻥ ﻟَﻴَ َﻤﺴ ﱠﱠﻦ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َُﻮﺍ َﻋ ﱠﻤﺎ ﻳَﻘُﻮﻟُ َ ﺍﺣ ٌﺪ َﻭﺇِﻥ ﻟﱠ ْﻢ ﻳَﻨﺘَﻬ ْ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ِﻣ ْﻦ ﺇِﻟَـ ٍﻪ ﺇِﻻﱠ ﺇِﻟَـﻪٌ َﻭ ِ
ﱠﺣﻴ ٌﻢ} {74 ﷲُ َﻏﻔُﻮ ٌﺭ ﺭ ِ ﷲِ َﻭﻳَ ْﺴﺘَ ْﻐﻔِﺮُﻭﻧَﻪُ َﻭ ّ ُﻮﻥ ﺇِﻟَﻰ ّ َﻋ َﺬﺍﺏٌ ﺃَﻟِﻴ ٌﻢ} {73ﺃَﻓَﻼَ ﻳَﺘُﻮﺑ َ
ﺻ ﱢﺪﻳﻘَﺔٌ َﻛﺎﻧَﺎ ﺖ ِﻣﻦ ﻗَ ْﺒﻠِ ِﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﱡ ُﺳ ُﻞ َﻭﺃُ ﱡﻣﻪُ ِ ﱠﻣﺎ ْﺍﻟ َﻤ ِﺴﻴ ُﺢ ﺍﺑ ُْﻦ َﻣﺮْ ﻳَ َﻢ ﺇِﻻﱠ َﺭﺳُﻮ ٌﻝ ﻗَ ْﺪ َﺧﻠَ ْ
ﻮﻥ} {75ﻗُﻞْ ﺕ ﺛُ ﱠﻢ ﺍﻧﻈُﺮْ ﺃَﻧﱠﻰ ﻳ ُْﺆﻓَ ُﻜ َ ْﻒ ﻧُﺒَﻴ ُﱢﻦ ﻟَﻬُ ُﻢ ﺍﻵﻳَﺎ ِ ﻳَﺄْ ُﻛﻼَ ِﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﱠ َﻌﺎ َﻡ ﺍﻧﻈُﺮْ َﻛﻴ َ
ﷲُ ﻫُ َﻮ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺴ ِﻤﻴ ُﻊ ﺿ ّﺮﺍً َﻭﻻَ ﻧَ ْﻔﻌﺎ ً َﻭ ّ ﻚ ﻟَ ُﻜ ْﻢ َ ﷲِ َﻣﺎ ﻻَ ﻳَ ْﻤﻠِ ُ ﻭﻥ ّ ﻭﻥ ِﻣﻦ ُﺩ ِ ﺃَﺗَ ْﻌﺒُ ُﺪ َ
ُﻮﺍ ﺃَ ْﻫ َﻮﺍء ﻖ َﻭﻻَ ﺗَﺘﱠﺒِﻌ ْ ﻮﺍ ﻓِﻲ ِﺩﻳﻨِ ُﻜ ْﻢ َﻏ ْﻴ َﺮ ْﺍﻟ َﺤ ﱢ ﺏ ﻻَ ﺗَ ْﻐﻠُ ْ ْﺍﻟ َﻌﻠِﻴ ُﻢ} {76ﻗُﻞْ ﻳَﺎ ﺃَ ْﻫ َﻞ ْﺍﻟ ِﻜﺘَﺎ ِ
ﻴﻞ} {77ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻮﺍ َﻋﻦ َﺳ َﻮﺍء ﺍﻟ ﱠﺴﺒِ ِ ﺿﻠﱡ ْ ﻮﺍ َﻛﺜِﻴﺮﺍً َﻭ َ ﺿﻠﱡ ْﻮﺍ ِﻣﻦ ﻗَ ْﺒ ُﻞ َﻭﺃَ َ ﺿﻠﱡ ْ ﻗَ ْﻮ ٍﻡ ﻗَ ْﺪ َ
ﻭﺑﻬﺬﺍ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ 17ﻭﺭﻗﺔ ﻻ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺭﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺧﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ !!!
ﺃﻛﺮﺭ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﻓﻲ 17ﻭﺭﻗﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ.. !!...ہﻠﻟ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﺑﻘﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳُﻔﻨﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻳُﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ؟!
ﻭﻳﺘﺒﻊ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺃﺧﺮ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ !
ﷲُ َﻻ ﻳَ ْﻬ ِﺪﻱ ﺍﻹﺳ َْﻼ ِﻡ َﻭ ﱠ ﺏ َﻭﻫُ َﻮ ﻳُ ْﺪ َﻋﻰ ﺇِﻟَﻰ ْ ِ ﷲِ ْﺍﻟ َﻜ ِﺬ َﻅﻠَ ُﻢ ِﻣ ﱠﻤ ِﻦ ﺍ ْﻓﺘَ َﺮﻯ َﻋﻠَﻰ ﱠ َﻭ َﻣ ْﻦ ﺃَ ْ
ﻮﺭ ِﻩ َﻭﻟَ ْﻮ
ﷲُ ُﻣﺘِ ﱡﻢ ﻧُ ِ ﷲِ ﺑِﺄ َ ْﻓ َﻮﺍ ِﻫ ِﻬ ْﻢ َﻭ ﱠ
ُﻄﻔِﺌُﻮﺍ ﻧُﻮ َﺭ ﱠ ﻭﻥ ﻟِﻴ ْ
ﻴﻦ ) (7ﻳ ُِﺮﻳ ُﺪ َ ْﺍﻟﻘَ ْﻮ َﻡ ﺍﻟﻈﱠﺎﻟِ ِﻤ َ
ُﻈ ِﻬ َﺮﻩُ َﻋﻠَﻰ ﻖ ﻟِﻴ ْ
ﻳﻦ ْﺍﻟ َﺤ ﱢ ُﻭﻥ ) (8ﻫُ َﻮ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬﻱ ﺃَﺭْ َﺳ َﻞ َﺭﺳُﻮﻟَﻪُ ﺑِ ْﺎﻟﻬُ َﺪﻯ َﻭ ِﺩ ِ َﻛ ِﺮﻩَ ْﺍﻟ َﻜﺎﻓِﺮ َ
ﻮﻥ ) 9ﺍﻟﺼﻒ( ﻳﻦ ُﻛﻠﱢ ِﻪ َﻭﻟَ ْﻮ َﻛ ِﺮﻩَ ْﺍﻟ ُﻤ ْﺸ ِﺮ ُﻛ َ
ﺍﻟ ﱢﺪ ِ
-2 -
ﺃﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ "ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺑﻦ ﷲ"
"ﻟﻴﺘﻜﻢ ﺗﺤﺘﻤﻠﻮﻥ ﻏﺒﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﻗﻠﻴﻼ2) .ﻛﻮ ( 1: 11
ﺃﻧﺎ ﻟﺴﺖ ﻓﻲ ﺻﺪﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻮﺍﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﻲ ﻭﺗﻨﺎﻗﻀﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﺑﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﻫﻨﺎ
ﺒﻮﺍ ہﻠﻟ ﺍﻵﺏ "ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ" ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺩﺓ !
ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻫﻮ ﷲ ،،،ﻣﻮﻟﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻕ ،،،ﺃﻓﻮﺻﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﻟﻴﺴﻪ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻬﻢ ﻧﺤﻦ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ "ﷲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﷲ ﺍﻟﺼﻤﺪ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻠﺪ ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﻮﻟﺪ ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻪ ﻛﻔﻮﺍ
ﺃﺣﺪ"
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻲ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻖ ؟! ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺐ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻷﻏﺒﻴﺎء ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺴﺘﻤﻌﻮﻥ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ !!
ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﻞ "ﺭﺯﻕ ﺍﻟﻬﺒﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﻦ "
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻤﺎ ﺗﻄﺮﻕ ﻟﻠﻔﻈﺔ ":ﺇﺑﻦ ﷲ" ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻌﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺇﻳﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﺎﺭﺩﺍ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻔﻖ ﻣﻊ "ﻟﻢ ﻳﻠﺪ ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﻮﻟﺪ"
ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺑﻦ ﷲ ﺹ 15
… ﷲ ﺍﻵﺏ:)) ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻳﻤﺎﻥ )ﺑﺎﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻧﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﺈﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ
ﻧﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺍﺑﻦ ﷲ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ … ﻧﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻮﺭ )ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ
(( (.(ﺫﺍﺕ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﷲ
!!ﺃﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺼﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺤﻲ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻢ ؟..ﺃﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻟﺪﻱ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺇﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ "ﷲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ4 ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻲ "ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺑﻦ ﷲ" ﺹ
"ﻓﻲ ﺛﺎﻟﻮﺙ
ﺃﻟﻢ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻭﻣﺪﻟﺲ ﻭﻛﺬﺍﺏ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻧﺼﺎ ﻣﺤﺮﻓﺎ ﺛﻢ ﻳﺒﻨﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
!! ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ
ﻭﺇﻟﻴﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺎﺕ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﺓ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻗﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺎء ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺤﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻓﺔ
ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻭﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻳﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺠﺴﺪ ﻭﺇﻟﻮﻫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻧﺔ
!! ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺤﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺨﺮﻓﻴﻦ
(ASV) And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness; He who was
manifested in the flesh, Justified in the spirit, Seen of angels, Preached among the
nations, Believed on in the world, Received up in glory.
(DRB) And evidently great is the mystery of godliness, which was manifested in the
flesh, was justified in the spirit, appeared unto angels, hath been preached unto the
Gentiles, is believed in the world, is taken up in glory.
(BBE) And without argument, great is the secret of religion: He who was seen in the
flesh, who was given God's approval in the spirit, was seen by the angels, of whom the
good news was given among the nations, in whom the world had faith, who was taken
up in glory.
(CEV) Here is the great mystery of our religion: Christ came as a human. The Spirit
proved that he pleased God, and he was seen by angels. Christ was preached to the
nations. People in this world put their faith in him, and he was taken up to glory.
(WNT) And, beyond controversy, great is the mystery of our religion-- that Christ
appeared in human form, and His claims justified by the Spirit, was seen by angels
and proclaimed among Gentile nations, was believed on in the world, and received up
again into glory.
(GNB) No one can deny how great is the secret of our religion: He appeared in
human form, was shown to be right by the Spirit, and was seen by angels. He was
preached among the nations, was believed in throughout the world, and was taken up
to heaven
(Murdock) and truly great, is this mystery of righteousness, which was revealed in
the flesh, and justified in the spirit, and seen by angels, and proclaimed among the
Gentiles, and believed on in the world, and received up into glory.
(RV) And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness; He who was
manifested in the flesh, justified in the spirit, seen of angels, preached among the
nations, believed on in the world, received up in glory.
(ISV) By common confession, the secret of our godly worship is great: In flesh was he
revealed to sight, Kept righteous by the Spirit's might, Adored by angels singing. To
nations was he manifest, Believing souls found peace and rest, Our Lord in heaven
reigning!
"ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﺮﻋﻰ ﻏﻨﻢ ﻳﺜﺮﻭﻥ ﺣﻤﻴﻪ ﻛﺎﻫﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺎﻥ.ﻓﺴﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﻰ
ﻭﺭﺍء ﺍﻟﺒﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺟﺎء ﺇﻟﻰ ﺟﺒﻞ ﷲ ﺣﻮﺭﻳﺐ .ﻭﻅﻬﺮ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻼﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺑﻠﻬﻴﺐ ﻧﺎﺭ
ﻣﻦ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻋﻠﻴّﻘﺔ .ﻓﻨﻈﺮ ﻭﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﻘﺔ ﺗﺘﻮﻗّﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﻢ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺗﺤﺘﺮﻕ .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ
ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺃﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻷﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ .ﻟﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﺗﺤﺘﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﻘﺔ .ﻓﻠﻤﺎ
ﺭﺃﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﻝ ﻟﻴﻨﻈﺮ ﻧﺎﺩﺍﻩ ﷲ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ.ﻓﻘﺎﻝ
ﻫﺎﺃﻧﺬﺍ .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻻ ﺗﻘﺘﺮﺏ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻫﻬﻨﺎ .ﺍﺧﻠﻊ ﺣﺬﺍﺋﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺟﻠﻴﻚ .ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﺃﻧﺖ ﻭﺍﻗﻒ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﺭﺽ ﻣﻘﺪﺳﺔ ،ﺛﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺃﺑﻴﻚ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﺇﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﺤﻖ
ﻭﺇﻟﻪ ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺏ.ﻓﻐﻄﻰ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﻑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﻟﻰ ﷲ"((.
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺹ 6
)) ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﺮﺃ ﻗﺼﺔ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺺ ﻭﻓﻰ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﻁﻪ ﻭﻓﻲ
ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻞ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﻗﺪ ﻅﻬﺮ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ.
-1ﺳـﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺺ (30 : 29 ) :
"ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻗﻀﻰ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﻷﺟﻞ ﻭﺳﺎﺭ ﺑﺄﻫﻠﻪ ﺁﻧﺲ )ﺭﺃﻱ( ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺭ
)ﺟﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺭ( ﻧﺎﺭﺍً .ﻗﺎﻝ ﻷﻫﻠﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺜﻮﺍ .ﺇﻧﻲ ﺁﻧﺴﺖ ﻧﺎﺭﺍً ﻟﻌﻠﻰ ﺁﺗﻴﻜﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺨﺒﺮ
ﺃﻭ ﺟﺬﺭﻩ )ﺟﻤﺮﺓ ﻣﻠﺘﻬﺒﺔ( ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻟﻌﻠﻜﻢ ﺗﺼﻄﻠﻮﻥ )ﺗﺴﺘﺪﻓﺌﻮﻥ( .ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺁﺗﺎﻫﺎ
ﻧﻮﺩﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺎﻁﺊ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻷﻳﻤﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺒﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﺃﻥ :ﻳﺎ
ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺇﻧﻲ ﺃﻧﺎ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻴﻦ".
ﻟﻌﻠﻚ ﺗﻼﺣﻆ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺳﻤﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﻧﺒﻌﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﻌﺔ
ﺍﻟﻤﺒﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ.
ﻭﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻓﻲ:
-2ﺳـﻮﺭﺓ ﻁﻪ .(13 -8) :
"ﻫﻞ ﺃﺗﺎﻙ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺇﺫ ﺭﺃﻯ ﻧﺎﺭﺍً .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻷﻫﻠﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺜﻮﺍ ﺇﻧﻲ ﺁﻧﺴﺖ ﻧﺎﺭﺍً.
ﻟﻌﻠﻰ ﺁﺗﻴﻜﻢ ﺑﻘﺒﺲ )ﺷﻌﻠﺔ( ﻣﻨﻬﺎ .ﺃﻭ ﺃﺟﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﺪﻯ )ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩﺍ( .ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺃﺗﺎﻫﺎ
ﻧﻮﺩﻱ :ﻳﺎ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺇﻧﻲ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺭﺑﻚ ﻓﺎﺧﻠﻊ ﻧﻌﻠﻴﻚ ﺇﻧﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻁﻮﻯ )ﻫﺬﺍ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺩﻱ( … ﺇﻧﻲ ﺃﻧﺎ ﷲ ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﺎ".
ﻭﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺇﻳﻀﺎﺣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻓﻲ:
-3ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻞ )7ـ:(9
"ﺇﺫ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻷﻫﻠﻪ ﺇﻧﻲ ﺁﻧﺴﺖ ﻧﺎﺭﺍ ﺳﺂﺗﻴﻜﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺨﺒﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺁﺗﻴﻜﻢ ﺑﺸﻬﺎﺏ
ﻗﺒﺲ )ﺷﻌﻠﺔ ﻣﻠﺘﻬﺒﺔ( ﻟﻌﻠﻜﻢ ﺗﺼﻄﻠﻮﻥ ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺟﺎءﻫﺎ ﻧﻮﺩﻱ ﺃﻥ :ﺑﻮﺭﻙ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺣﻮﻟﻬﺎ ﻭﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻴﻦ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺇﻧﻪ ﺃﻧﺎ ﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ
ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻴﻢ".
ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﺇﻥ ﷲ ﻗﺪ ﻅﻬﺮ ﻟﻤﻮﺳﻰ ﻓﻲ ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﺧﺎﻁﺒﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ:
"ﺇﻧﻰ ﺃﻧﺎ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻴﻦ" )ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺺ( ﻭﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺨﻠﻊ ﻧﻌﻠﻴﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ
ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ]ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺤﻠﻮﻝ ﷲ ﻓﻴﻪ[ .ﺛﻢ ﺃﻛﺪ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ "ﺇﻧﻲ ﺃﻧﺎ
ﷲ ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﺎ" )ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﻁﻪ( ﻭﻓﻲ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻞ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻪ ":ﺑﻮﺭﻙ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺣﻮﻟﻬﺎ ﻭﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻴﻦ ،ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ :ﺇﻧﻪ ﺃﻧﺎ ﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ
ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻴﻢ".
ﻭﺩﻋﻨﻲ ﺃﻗﺪﻡ ﺳﺆﺍﻻ ﺑﺴﻴﻄﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ :ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ؟((
ﻭﻳﻜﻤﻞ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺍ ﻛﺬﺑﺔ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻛﺬﺑﺔ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ )) :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﻧﻨﻲ ﻭﺟﻬﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ ﻷﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎء ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﺘﻔﻀﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻮﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ـ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺘﺮﺓ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ
ﺑﻘﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﻴﺮ ـ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ" :ﻟﻘﺪ ُﺧﻴﻞ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ!!
ﻓﺴﺄﻟﺘﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺤﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ُﺧﻴﻞ ﺇﻟﻰ
ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ......ﺇﻟﺦ((
ﺣﺴﻨﺎ ..ﻫﻮ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﺗﺠﺴﺪ ﻓﻲ ﺷﺠﺮﺓ...ﻭﻧﺤﻦ ﻧﻨﻔﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻴﺎ
ﻭﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﻒ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺇﻻ !
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻧﺆﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﻛﻠﻢ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﺜﻠﻪ ﺷﺊ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻴﻊ
ﺍﻟﺒﺼﻴﺮ !
ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﺗﺠﺴﺪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﺑﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ...ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎ ..ﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺎہﻠﻟ ﺗﺠﺴﺪ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺭﻗﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﺇﻧﻪ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ !!
ﻭﻟﻠﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺧﻠﻊ ﻋﻘﻠﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻛﻨﻴﺴﺘﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﻔﻌﻞ ﺑﺄﺣﺬﻳﺘﻨﺎ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ
ﻟﻸﺳﻒ ﺳﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻘﻠﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﺮﻕ ﺣﺬﺍﺋﻲ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺓ ...ﻭﻟﻬﺬﺍ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺳﺆﺍﻻ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﻳﻨﻘﺾ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺌﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺆﺍﻟﻲ ﻫﻮ :ﻟﻢ ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ "ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﻫﻲ ﷲ" ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻁﺎﻟﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ؟
ﺃﺗﻈﻦ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﻚ ﺑﻼ ﻋﻘﻞ ...ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻬﻠﻮﺍﻧﻴﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﺒﻬﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻅﻨﺎ ﻣﻨﻚ ﺍﻧﻚ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻔﺤﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ؟
ﺃﻋﻴﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﺗﺠﺴﺪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﺗﺠﺴﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﻭ ﺃﻧﺖ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ "ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻫﻮ ﷲ" ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ
"ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﻫﻲ ﷲ" ؟
ﻟﻢ ﻻ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ...ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ؟
ﻭﻟﻢ ﺑﺪﻋﺘﻢ ﺳﺒﻴﻠﻴﻮﺱ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ؟
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺠﺮﺩ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﻭﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻞ !
ﻭﺗﻜﺮﺭﺕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘﺔ 19ﻭ 48ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ "
ﻓﺘﺠﻠﻰ ﷲ ﻟﻠﺠﺒﻞ..ﻓﺼﺎﺭ ﺩﻛﺎ ..ﻭﺻﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺻﻌﻘﺎ" ﺛﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘﺔ 20
ﻭ 30ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ " ﺍﻟﺠﺒﻞ ....ﺟﻤﺎﺩ ..ﺗﺠﻠﻰ ﻟﻪ ﷲ"
ﻭﻧﺎﻫﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺷﺮﺑﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺎﺽ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ " :ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻛﺘﻴﺮ ﻳﺎ
ﻧﺎﺱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﺠﻠﻰ ﻓﻲ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ؟! " ﺛﻢ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻬﺎ "ﺃﻩ ﻳﺘﺠﻠﻲ
ﻓﻲ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭ"...
ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻟﺪﻱ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻗﻮﻝ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻮﻟﻲ ﻭﺭﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻌﺪﻳﺎ!
ﻭﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻮﺳﻲ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺇﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﻓﻌﻼ
ﻭﺇﻟﻳﻛﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺩﺙ ...ﺑﻌﺩﻣﺎ ﻛﻠﻡ ﻣﻭﺳﻰ ﺍﻟﺭﺏ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺭﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺗﺧﻠﺹ
ﻣﻧﻪ)...ﻳﺧﻠﺹ ﻋﻠﻳﻪ )ﻷﻧﻪ ﺭﺁﻩ ....ﻭﻻ ﻳﺭﻯ ﺍﺣﺩ ﷲ ﻭﻳﻌﻳﺵ ....ﻓﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﻗﺗﻝ
ﻣﻭﺳﻰ ﻭﻟﻛﻥ )ﻭﺭﺍء ﻛﻝ ﺭﺟﻝ ﻋﻅﻳﻡ ﺃﻣﺭﺃﺓ( ﺻﻔﻭﺭﺓ ﺯﻭﺟﺗﻪ ﺃﺧﺫﺕ ﺍﻟﺳﻛﻳﻥ
)ﻻ ﺗﺧﻑ ﻟﻡ ﺗﻘﺗﻝ ﺍﻟﺭﺏ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﺏ ﺣﻲ ﻻ ﻳﻣﻭﺕ( ﻭﻟﻛﻥ ﻗﻁﻌﺕ ﻏﺭﻟﺔ ﺃﺑﻧﺗﻬﺎ
)ﺟﺯء ﻣﻥ ﻋﺿﻭ ﺑﻧﺗﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺗﻧﺎﺳﻠﻲ "ﺧﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺎﺙ" ﻭ ﻗﺎﻣﻭﺱ ﺳﺗﺭﻭﻧﺞ ﻳﻘﻭﻝ
ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺟﺯء ﺍﻟﻣﻘﻁﻭﻉ Feminineﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﻧﺙ( ﺛﻡ ﻭﺿﻌﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺟﻠﻲ
ﺍﻟﺭﺏ ...ﻭﻗﺎﻟﺕ ﻟﻠﺭﺏ ﺇﻧﻙ ﻋﺭﻳﺱ ﺩﻡ ﻟﻲ ﻭﻫﻧﺎ ﺇﻧﻔﻙ ﻋﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﺭﺏ )ﺃﻱ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ
ﻳﺗﺻﺎﺭﻋﺎﻥ( ﺛﻡ ﺗﺭﻛﻪ ﺑﻔﺿﻝ ﻋﺿﻭ ﺗﻧﺎﺳﻠﻲ ﻣﻘﻁﻭﻉ ﻷﻣﺭﺃﺓ ﻗﺩﻣﺗﻪ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻣﺭﺃﺓ
..
ﺍﻟﺣﻛﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﺣﻛﻳﺗﻬﺎ ﻟﻛﻡ ﻟﻳﺳﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺗﺎﺏ "ﺃﺑﻭ ﺯﻳﺩ ﺍﻟﻬﻼﻟﻲ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ" ﻭﻻ
ﻛﺗﺎﺏ "ﺃﻟﻑ ﻟﻳﻠﺔ ﻭﻟﻳﻠﺔ" ﻭﻻ ﻛﺗﺏ ﺍﻟﺯﻧﺎﺩﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﺗﺳﺏ ﷲ...ﻻ ..ﺇﻧﻣﺎ ﻓﻲ
ﻛﺗﺎﺏ ﺃﺳﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﻛﺗﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺩﺱ ﻳﺯﻋﻣﻭﻥ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻥ ﻋﻧﺩ ﷲ...
ﺃﻗﺭﺃ ﻳﺎ ﻋﺑﺩ ﷲ
ﺃﻱ ﻛﻔﺭ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻭﻟﻭﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺻﻭﺭﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﺭﺏ ﻛﺿﻌﻳﻑ ﻳﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﻗﺗﻝ ﻣﻭﺳﻰ ﺛﻡ
ﻳﺗﺭﻛﻪ ﻷﺟﻝ ﻗﻁﻌﺔ ﻣﻥ ﻓﺭﺝ ﺃﻣﺭﺃﺓ ؟
ﺃﻱ ﻛﻔﺭ ﻭﻋﺗﻪ ﻫﺫﺍ ؟
20 : 23 ﻓﻳﺫﻛﺭﻧﺎ ﺑﺣﺯﻗﻳﺎﻝ...ﻭﺣﺗﻰ ﻟﻭ ﻛﺎﻧﺕ ﻗﻁﻌﺔ ﻣﻥ ﻓﺭﺝ ﺭﺟﻝ
)Ezekiel 23 : 20 New International Version (NIV
whose ،There she lusted after her lovers
genitals were like those of donkeys and whose
emission was like that of horses.
ﻭﻣﺎﺯﺍﻟﺕ ﺍﺫﻛﺭ ﻓﺎﻟﺣﻛﺎﻳﺔ ﻟﻳﺳﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺗﺎﺏ "ﺃﺑﻭ ﺯﻳﺩ ﺍﻟﻬﻼﻟﻲ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ" ﻭﻻ ﻓﻲ
"ﺃﻟﻑ ﻟﻳﻠﺔ ﻭﻟﻳﻠﺔ" ﻓﻬﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻛﺗﺏ ﺃﺭﻗﻰ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺫﻛﺭ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺗﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺑﻠﻪ
ﺍﻟﻣﻐﻭﻟﻲ...ﻭﻟﻛﻧﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺗﺎﺏ ﺃﺳﻣﻪ "ﺍﻟﻛﺗﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺩﺱ"ﻓﻬﻝ ﻻﺯﻝ ﺃﺣﺩ ﻳﺅﻣﻥ ﺑﻪ
؟
ﺻﺩﻗﻭﻧﻲ ﻧﺣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﻠﻣﻭﻥ ﻧﺷﻌﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺭﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻡ ﻭﺭﺑﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺛﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻥ ﻣﺟﺭﺩ
ﻗﺭﺍءﺓ ﻭﺳﻣﺎﻉ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺷﺗﺎﺋﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻕ ﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻅﻳﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺩﻭﺱ ..ﺧﺎﻟﻕ ﺍﻟﺳﻣﺎﻭﺍﺕ
ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ..ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻳﻘﻭﻝ ﻟﻠﺷﺊ ﻛﻥ ﻓﻳﻛﻭﻥ
ﻭﻧﺳﺗﻐﺭﺏ ﻫﻝ ﻣﻥ ﻣﺅﻣﻧﻳﻥ ﺑﻬﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻬﺭﺍء؟
ﻭﻟﻸﺳﻑ ﻧﺟﺩ ﻓﻌﻼ ﻣﻥ ﻳﺅﻣﻥ ﺑﻬﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻛﺗﺎﺏ.......ﻭﺻﺩﻕ ﻣﻥ ﺳﻣﻰ ﻫﺅﻻء
ﺿﺎﻟﻳﻥ...ﻭﻳﺧﺗﺎﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺿﻼﻝ ﻭﻫﻡ ﻳﻌﺭﻓﻭﻥ ﻓﺳﺎﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻡ ﻋﻠﻳﻪ.
ﻭﻫﻤﺎ ﻓﺮﻗﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﻬﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ":ﺇﻥ ﻅﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺣﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺠﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺴﻤﺎﻧﻲ
)ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺩﻱ( ﻻ ﻳﻨﻜﺮﻩ ﻋﺎﻗﻞ".
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻋﻄﻮﺍ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺤﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ":ﻛﻈﻬﻮﺭ ﺟﺒﺮﻳﻞ ﻓﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻋﺮﺍﺑﻲ ،ﻭﺗﻤﺜﻠﻪ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ
ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ".
)ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻭﺍﻷﻫﻮﺍء ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ ﺟﺰء 2ﺹ (( (25
ﻭﺳﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻟﺘﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺷﻴﺎء ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﻤﻸ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺼﺎﻗﺎ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺇﺳﻤﻪ "ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ" ﻟﻠﺸﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﻣﻌﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻴﺮ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺇﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟﺴﻲ "ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ ﻭﺍﻷﻫﻮﺍء" ﻭﺇﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﺟﻠﻴﻞ ﻓﺄﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻰ
ﻣﺮﺟﻌﺎ ﺟﻴﺪ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ...ﻭﺣﺘﻰ ﺇﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻳﺤﺮﻓﻪ..ﺃﻻ ﻟﻌﻨﺔ
ﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻟﻤﻴﻦ!
ﻣﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﻬﻢ !!! ..ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻷﺷﺮ " ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻴﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺳﺤﺎﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻤﺎ
ﻓﺮﻗﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﻬﻤﺎ "
ﺇﺫﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﻬﻢ ﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺒﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺴﻤﺔ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻠﻤﻴﺬ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ!!
ﻭﻟﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺠﺴﺪ ...ﻷﻧﻬﻢ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﺣﻞ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺋﻤﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻝ
ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ..ﻓﻬﻢ ﻛﺤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﺃﺭﺍﺩﻭﺍ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺤﺬﻭﻥ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺤﺬﻭ
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮﻳﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺇﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻵﻟﻬﺔ...ﻭﻫﻢ ﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﺑﺈﺟﻤﺎﻉ
ﺍﻷﻣﺔ !
ﻓﻴﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺑﺈﺧﻮﺗﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺟﻴﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﺠﺴﺪ
ﷲ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺁﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ..ﺃﻻ ﻟﻌﻨﺔ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺫﺑﻴﻦ!!
ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ..ﻓﺴﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺄﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺑﺒﻄﺮﺳﻪ ﻭﻻ
ﻳﻠﻮﻣﻦ ﺇﻻ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ !
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﺰء ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻖ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﺘﺠﺴﺪ ﺍﻹﻟﻪ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ
ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻔﺮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻁﻼﻕ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :
)) -ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷﻲ :
ﻗﺎﻝ":ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻼﻫﻮﺕ ﻅﻬﺮ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ
ﷲ") .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻫﺎﻣﺶ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﻭﻱ ﺟﺰء 2
ﺹ (( (143
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺳﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺷﻴﺨﺎ ؟
ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻟﻸﻣﺮ ﺑﺘﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﻭﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﻭﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻴﻦ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﺘﺒﺲ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎء ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻟﻨﺼﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺃﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎ
ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ .
ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺿﻊ ﺭﺃﺳﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺼﻠﺔ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ !!..
ﻟﻘﺪ ﺇﺳﺘﺤﻰ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﺘﺐ "ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﷲ" ﻓﺈﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻮﻗﻊ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺎﻗﻞ
ﻓﻲ ﻣﺄﺯﻕ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﻛﺒﻴﺮ ﻻ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺨﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻓﻲ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻜﻨﻴﺴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻧﺨﻠﻊ ﺃﺣﺬﻳﺘﻨﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﻭﺗﺴﺮﻕ ﺃﺣﺬﻳﺘﻨﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺴﺮﻕ ﺃﺣﺬﻳﺘﻬﻢ !!
ﻓﻠﻮ ﺃﺧﺬﻧﺎ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ "ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﷲ" ﺛﻢ ﻭﺿﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ "ﷲ" ﻣﻜﺎﻥ "ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ"
ﻓﺴﺘﺼﺒﺢ "ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪء ﻛﺎﻥ ﷲ ﻭﷲ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﷲ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﷲ ﷲ".
ﻓﺄﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﻨﺤﻞ ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ )))ﻧﺤﻦ ﻧﺆﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻫﻮ :ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﷲ ﺇﺫ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻹﻧﺠﻴﻞ "ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪء ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ …ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﷲ" )ﻳﻮﺣﻨﺎ(( .(1 :1
ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺿﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻖ ﻭﻳﺤﺎﻭﻝ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻪ ﻓﻲ
ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺟﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﺒﺸﻴﺮ !
ﻭﻛﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺄﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ 11
)) -ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ) :ﻭﻫﻰ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ (
ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﻅﻬﻮﺭ ﷲ ﻟﻤﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺺ
ﻭﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﻁﻪ ﻭﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻞ )ﺇﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﷲ ﺣﻞ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺠﺴﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ((( .
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻬﻢ
ﻭﺃﻭﻝ ﺇﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﷲ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻕ ..ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ
ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ !! ﻓﻬﻲ ﻳﺨﺪﻣﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ؟
ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺍﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻻ ﻳﺨﺪﻣﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﻓﻀﻼ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺨﺪﻣﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﻀﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﻓﻈﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ!
ﻓﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺇﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺴﺘﺸﻬﺪ ﺑﻬﻢ ﺃﻭﻻ ﻟﺌﻼ ﺗﻜﺘﺐ ﻛﻼﻣﺎ ﻻ
ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺎﻉ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺭﻗﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺲ ؟!
ﻭﻧﻜﻤﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ )) -3ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺋﻄﻴﺔ ) :ﻭﻫﻰ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ(
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺋﻂ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺋﻄﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ" .ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ
ﺗﺪﺭﻉ ﺑﺎﻟﺠﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺴﻤﺎﻧﻲ )ﺃﻱ ﻟﺒﺲ ﺟﺴﺪﺍ ﻛﺪﺭﻉ( ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻤﺔ
)ﺍﻷﺯﻟﻴﺔ( ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺠﺴﺪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ"
)ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻭﺍﻷﻫﺮﺍء ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ ﺟﺰء 1ﺹ (( .(77
ﺭﺟﻌﺖ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻣﺼﺪﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻓﺎﻕ ﻓﻠﻢ ﺃﺟﺪ ﻻ ﺣﺎﺋﻂ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺤﺰﻧﻮﻥ !!
ﺭﺟﻌﺖ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ ﻟﻠﺸﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻭﺭﺟﻌﺖ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ
ﻭﺍﻷﻫﻮﺍء ﻹﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﻓﻠﻢ ﺃﺟﺪ ﺣﺎﺋﻄﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ
ﻭﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺋﻂ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺇﺻﺘﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻓﻲ ﻁﻔﻮﻟﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻴﺴﺔ ﻓﺄﺛﺮ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻘﻠﻪ ﺑﻞ ﻭﺍﻹﺳﺘﺸﻬﺎﺩ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﻪ "ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ" ﻓﺤﺘﻰ ﻓﻲ
ﻟﻢ ﻳﻔﻠﺢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴﺲ ..ﻓﻔﻲ ﺃﻱ ﻣﺠﺎﻝ ﻳﻔﻠﺢ ؟
ﺃﻛﺮﺭ ﺍﻹﺳﺘﺸﻬﺎﺩ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻟﺒﻄﺮﺱ ﻭﻻ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺃﺧﺮ ﺫﻭ
ﺇﺳﻢ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﻪ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ...ﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ -ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﺳﻠﻮﺑﻪ -ﻟﻦ ﻳﻐﻨﻲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺴﺘﺸﻬﺪ ﺑﻬﻢ ﻓﺮﻕ
ﺧﺮﺟﺖ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﻴﺮﻳﺔ ..ﻭﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻤﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﺜﻼ ..ﻭﻫﻮ ﻟﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻌﻴﺪﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺇﺳﺘﺸﻬﺪﺕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺮﻳﻤﻴﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺒﺮﺃ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﻲ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻠﻘﺔ ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺏ !!
ﻣﺘﻰ 1: 7ﻻ ﺗﺪﻳﻨﻮﺍ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻻ ﺗﺪﺍﻧﻮﺍ ﻻﻧﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻳﻨﻮﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺗﺪﻳﻨﻮﻥ
ﺗﺪﺍﻧﻮﻥ.ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﻴﻠﻮﻥ ﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﻟﻜﻢ
ﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﻗﻔﺔ ﻣﻄﻮﻟﺔ ﺇﻥ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺼﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻠﻞ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺳﻴﺼﺎﺏ –ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ -ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻊ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ !
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ 13
))ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﷲ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺠﺴﺪ
]ﺑﺤﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺤﻴﺔ[
ﻟﻘﺪ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻟﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺃﻧﻪ "ﺍﺑﻦ ﷲ" ﻣﺮﺍﺭﺍ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﺓ.
ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺛﻢ ﻧﻮﺿﺢ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ.
1ـ )ﻣﺖ (17 :3ﻋﻨﺪ ﻧﻬﺮ ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩ ﺳﻤﻊ ﺻﻮﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺕ
ﻗﺎﺋﻼ" :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺑﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺒﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺭﺕ"
2ـ )ﻣﺖ (5 :17ﻓﻲ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺗﺠﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺒﻞ "ﺇﺫﺍ ﺳﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻧﻴﺮﺓ ﻅﻠﻠﺘﻬﻢ
ﻭﺻﻮﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺑﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺒﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺭﺕ .ﻟﻪ
ﺍﺳﻤﻌﻮﺍ"
3ـ )ﻣﺮ (7 :9ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ "ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺳﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﺗﻈﻠﻠﻬﻢ ﻓﺠﺎء ﺻﻮﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺤﺎﺑﺔ
ﻗﺎﺋﻼ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺑﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺒﻴﺐ ﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﻤﻌﻮﺍ"
4ـ )2ﺑﻂ17 :1ﻭ( "ﺃﻗﺒﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺻﻮﺕ ﻛﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻣﺠﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺑﻨﻲ
ﺍﻟﺤﺒﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺳﺮﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ"
5ـ )ﻟﻮ" (22 :3ﻭﻧﺰﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺑﻬﻴﺌﺔ ﺟﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺣﻤﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺻﻮﺕ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﻗﺎﺋﻼ ﺃﻧﺖ ﺍﺑﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺒﻴﺐ ﺑﻚ ﺳﺮﺭﺕ" ((
ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻜﻢ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﺤﺮﻓﺔ ﻭﻣﻐﻴﺮﺓ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺜﺒﺘﻮﻛﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺇﻳﻤﺎﻧﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻁﻞ !
Luk 9:35
"ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺳﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻮﺿﺤﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﺔ "ﺇﺑﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺧﺘﺮﺗﻪ
ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺒﻴﻦ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻨﻮﺓ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﻳﺔ ﻟﻸﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺆﻣﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻓﺮﺃﻯ
ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺤﺬﻓﻮﻫﺎ ﻟﻴﺜﺒﺘﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻳﻤﺎﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻁﻞ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﻀﺤﻮﺍ
! ﺷﺮ ﻓﻀﻴﺤﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺜﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﻮﻥ ﷲ
ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻛﻼﺭﻙ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﺘﻀﺎﺭﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﻄﻮﻁﺎﺕ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻄﺔ ﻫﻞ
ﻫﻲ
ﺇﺑﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺒﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺧﺘﺮﺗﻪ؟........ ﺇﺑﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺧﺘﺮﺗﻪ ﺃﻡ....ﺇﺑﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺒﻴﺐ ﺃﻡ
ﻭﻟﺪﻯ ﻛﻼﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺍﺏ
)sinneth not; but God begotten of Jo 5:18) We know that whosoever is1
evil one toucheth he that was begotten of God keepeth himself, and the
...him notﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻟﺪ ﻣﻦ ﷲ ﻻ ﻳﺨﻄﺊ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﻟﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﷲ ﻳﺤﻔﻆ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺮ ﻻ ﻳﻤﺴﻪ
ﻭﻧﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺔ 6)) 13ـ )ﻳﻮ" (18 :1ﷲ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺮﻩ ﺃﺣﺪ
ﻗﻂ ﺍﻻﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻀﻦ ﺍﻵﺏ ﻫﻮ ﺧﺒﺮ"
7ـ )ﻳﻮ35 :3ﻭ " (36ﺍﻵﺏ ﻳﺤﺐ ﺍﻻﺑﻦ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺩﻓﻊ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲء ﻓﻲ ﻳﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﺆﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺑﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺃﺑﺪﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻻﺑﻦ ﻟﻦ ﻳﺮ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻤﻜﺚ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻏﻀﺐ ﷲ"((
ﷲ ﺃﻛﺒﺮ ..ﻫﺬﻩ ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﺿﺪﻩ...ﻣﺴﻜﻴﻦ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ !!
ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﻕ ﻳﺒﺘﺮ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ!
ﺃﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﺍﻹﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺎﻟﻤﺎ ﻳﻤﺜﻞ ﺩﻳﺎﻧﺔ ﺗﺪﻋﻲ
ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ؟!
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺹ .. 18ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﺘﻘﺪﻭﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻤﺮ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ
ﺃﺧﺮﺝ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﺬﺑﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺷﺊ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ..ﻻ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺒﻴﺮ ﻳﻤﻸ
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﻤﺎ ﻓﺎﺕ !!
ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺹ 18ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺇﺑﻦ ﷲ ﻻ
ﻴﻖ ﺑﺎہﻠﻟ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ )) ﻳﺤﺘﺞ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﻴﺮ )ﺍﺑﻦ ﷲ(
ﻭﻳﻌﺘﺮﺿﻮﻥ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻠﻴﻖ ﺑﺠﻼﻟﻪ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﻟﻤﻨـﺰﻩ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺒﻴﻬﺎﺕ.
ﻳﺠﺐ ﺃﻭﻻً ،ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﻓﻲ ﻟﻬﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﻴﺮ )ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺠﺴﺪﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﺳﻠﻴﺔ( .ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺗﻨـﺰﻳﻪ ﷲ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻻ ﺗﻠﻴﻖ ﺑﺠﻼﻝ ﷲ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻚ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ:
ﺳـﻮﺭﺓ ﻁﻪ:
"ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﻯ" ﻓﺎﻟﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﻓﻲ ﻟﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ :ﺃﻥ ﷲ
ﺟﻠﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺮﺵ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ .ﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻠﻴﻖ ﺑﺎہﻠﻟ؟ ﻭﻫﻞ ﷲ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ﻳﺠﻠﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺮﺳﻲ؟ ((.
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺟﺎء ﺑﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺟﻮﺩ
ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ "ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺵ ﺇﺳﺘﻮﻯ"
ﺛﺎﻟﺜﺎ :ﺍﻟﻐﺒﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻫﻞ ﻳﺄﺗﻲ ﺑﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﻻ ﻳﻔﻴﺪﻩ ..ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻄﺔ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺟﻼء ﻭﻭﺿﻮﺣﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﻳﺠﻠﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺵ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎﻻ
ﻧﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﻧﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﻣﺠﺪﻓﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ!
ﻓﻠﻨﻔﻀﺢ ﺣﻘﺪﻩ ﻟﻌﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ...ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻚ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ..
ﻞْ ﻳَﺎ ﺃَﻫْﻞَ ﺍﻟْﻜِﺘَﺎﺏِ ﻫَﻞْ ﺗَﻨْﻘِﻤُﻮﻥَ ﻣِﻨﱠﺎ ﺇِﻻﱠ ﺃَﻥْ ﺁﻣَﻨﱠﺎ ﺑِﺎہﻠﻟِ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﺃُ ْﻧ ِﺰ َﻝ ﺇِﻟَ ْﻴﻨَﺎ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﺃُ ْﻧ ِﺰ َﻝ ِﻣ ْﻦ
ﱠ
ﺎﺳﻘُ َ
ﻮﻥ؟ ﻗَ ْﺒ ُﻞ َﻭﺃَ ﱠﻥ ﺃَ ْﻛﺜَ َﺮ ُﻛ ْﻢ ﻓَ ِ
:Rv:7:10
10ﻭﻫﻢ ﻳﺼﺮﺧﻮﻥ ﺑﺼﻮﺕ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺨﻼﺹ ﻻﻟﻬﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻟﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺵ ﻭﻟﻠﺨﺮﻭﻑ(SVD) .
:Rv:6:16
16ﻭﻫﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﺠﺒﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺨﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﻘﻄﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﺍﺧﻔﻴﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻟﺲ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺵ ﻭﻋﻦ ﻏﻀﺐ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﻭﻑ )(SVD
:Rv:14:5
5ﻭﻓﻲ ﺍﻓﻮﺍﻫﻬﻢ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻏﺶ ﻻﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻼ ﻋﻴﺐ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻋﺮﺵ ﷲ )(SVD
ّ
ﺠﺪﻭﺍ ہﻠﻟ Rv:19:4ﻭﺧ ّﺮ ﺍﻻﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﺷﻴﺨﺎ ﻭﺍﻻﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻟﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺵ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﻴﻦ.ﻫﻠﻠﻮﻳﺎ(SVD) .
ﻓﻬﻞ ﻟﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻜﺮﻭﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ...ﺃﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻔﺮﻫﻢ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺑﻬﻢ؟
ﻓﺒﻄﺮﺱ ﺍﻟﻐﺒﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺳﺮﻕ ﻋﻘﻠﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺧﻠﻌﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻴﺴﺘﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻮ ﻛﻨﺘﻢ
ﺗﻨﻜﺮﻭﻥ ﻟﻔﻈﺔ "ﺇﺑﻦ ﷲ" ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻛﻢ "ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺵ ﺇﺳﺘﻮﻯ" ﻭﻛﺄﻧﻤﺎ
ﻟﻢ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻬﻪ "ﺟﺎﻟﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺵ" ﻭﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻬﻪ ﺧﺮﻭﻑ !!
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻖ ﻛﻼﻣﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻖ ﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺣﺪﻯ ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺗﻪ ﻻ
ﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻄﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺪﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺇﻗﺘﺮﻑ ﻟﺴﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺐ ﻭﺇﺳﺘﻬﺰﺍء ﺑﺎہﻠﻟ
ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ "ﺟﻠﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺵ " ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺗﺤﺪﺍﻩ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﺟﻼ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺨﺮﺝ ﻟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻱ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ
"ﺇﺳﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺵ" ﺑﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺟﻠﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺵ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﻓﻲ
ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺗﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻔﻆ !!
ﻫﻴﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﺟﻼ ﻓﻠﻴﺄﺗﻲ ﺑﻬﺎ…ﺃﻣﺎ ﻧﺤﻦ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ "ﺍﻹﺳﺘﻮﺍء ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻴﻒ
ﻣﺠﻬﻮﻝ"
:Gn:1:26
.26ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﷲ ﻧﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻨﺎ ﻛﺸﺒﻬﻨﺎ.ﻓﻴﺘﺴﻠﻄﻮﻥ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻤﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻁﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻬﺎﺋﻢ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻻﺭﺽ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ
ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺪﺑﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺪﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺭﺽ 27 .ﻓﺨﻠﻖ ﷲ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ.ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﷲ .
ﻓﻬﻞ ﻳﺤﻖ ﻟﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ ﻭﻳﻨﻜﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻀﻴﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻖ ؟!
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻲ؟
ﺻﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ
:Jos:4:24
24 24ﻟﻜﻲ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺷﻌﻮﺏ ﺍﻻﺭﺽ ﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺍﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻜﻲ ﺗﺨﺎﻓﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ
ﺍﻟﻬﻜﻢ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻻﻳﺎﻡ
Ps:75:8ﻻﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﻛﺎﺳﺎ ﻭﺧﻤﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﺨﺘﻤﺮﺓ.ﻣﻶﻧﺔ ﺷﺮﺍﺑﺎ
ﻣﻤﺰﻭﺟﺎ.ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺴﻜﺐ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ.
Ps:118:15ﺻﻮﺕ ﺗﺮﻧﻢ ﻭﺧﻼﺹ ﻓﻲ ﺧﻴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻳﻘﻴﻦ.ﻳﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺻﺎﻧﻌﺔ
ﺑﺒﺄﺱ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺔ Psa 118:15 The voice of rejoicing and salvation :
the right hand of :the tabernacles of the righteous is in
.doeth valiantly LORD the
:Jb:12:7
7ﻓﺎﺳﺄﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻬﺎﺋﻢ ﻓﺘﻌﻠﻤﻚ ﻭﻁﻴﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﻓﺘﺨﺒﺮﻙ 8 .ﺍﻭ ﻛﻠﻢ ﺍﻻﺭﺽ ﻓﺘﻌﻠﻤﻚ
ﻭﻳﺤﺪﺛﻚ ﺳﻤﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮ 9 .ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻫﺆﻻء ﺍﻥ ﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ.
10ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻴﺪﻩ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻛﻞ ﺣ ّﻲ ﻭﺭﻭﺡ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ.
:Ps:118:16
16ﻳﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ.ﻳﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺻﺎﻧﻌﺔ ﺑﺒﺄﺱ.
ﻫﻞ ﺗﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﺰﻳﺪ...ﻫﺬﻩ ﻧﺒﺬﻩ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻟﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺠﺴﺪ......ﻭﻟﻢ ﺃﺩﺧﻞ ﻓﻰ
ﺻﻔﺔ ﺍﻹﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺠﺴﺪ ﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﻘﻮﺑﺔ!!!..
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﷲ ﻟﻤﻮﺳﻰ
Ex:33:20ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻻ ﺗﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻥ ﺗﺮﻯ ﻭﺟﻬﻲ.ﻻﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭﻳﻌﻴﺶ.
)(SVD
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺛﻮﻟﻴﻜﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻰ )) 10 : 18ﺇِﻳﱠﺎ ُﻛﻢ ﺃَﻥ ﺗَﺤﺘَﻘِﺮﻭﺍ ﺃَ َﺣﺪﺍً ِﻣﻦ ﻫﺆﻻ ِء
ﺪﻭﻥ ﺃَﺑَﺪﺍً َﻭﺟﻪَ ﺃَﺑﻲ ﺍﻟﱠﺬﻱ ﺍﻟﺼﱢﻐﺎﺭ .ﺃَﻗﻮ ُﻝ ﻟﻜﻢ ﺇِ ﱠﻥ ﻣﻼﺋﻜﺘَﻬﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺴ َﻤﻮﺍ ِ
ﺕ ﻳُﺸﺎ ِﻫ َ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺴ َﻤﻮﺍﺕ((.
ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺣﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻷﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺘﻮﺏ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﻲ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﺃﻭﻻ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻘﺪ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﺠﻬﻞ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻨﻘﺪ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻳﻦ...ﻭﻻ
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺇﻻ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺭﺑﻨﺎ :
ُ ُ ﱠ
ﺎ ﺃَﻫْﻞَ ﺍﻟْﻜِﺘَﺎﺏِ ﻫَﻞْ ﺗَﻨْﻘِﻤُﻮﻥَ ﻣِﻨﱠﺎ ﺇِﻻﱠ ﺃَﻥْ ﺁﻣَﻨﱠﺎ ﺑِﺎہﻠﻟِ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﺃ ْﻧ ِﺰ َﻝ ﺇِﻟَ ْﻴﻨَﺎ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﺃ ْﻧ ِﺰ َﻝ ِﻣ ْﻦ
ﻮﻥ ؟؟! ﻗَ ْﺒ ُﻞ َﻭﺃَ ﱠﻥ ﺃَ ْﻛﺜَ َﺮ ُﻛ ْﻢ ﻓَ ِ
ﺎﺳﻘُ َ
-1ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻛﺴﺮ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺃﻟﻮﺍﺡ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺭﺍﺓ …ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﷲ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻨﺤﺖ ﻟﻮﺣﻴﻦ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ
Ex:34:4ﻓﻨﺤﺖ ﻟﻮﺣﻴﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﻛﺎﻻﻭﻟﻴﻦ.ﻭﺑﻜﺮ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﺒﺎﺡ
ﻭﺻﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺟﺒﻞ ﺳﻴﻨﺎء ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ.ﻭﺍﺧﺬ ﻓﻲ ﻳﺪﻩ ﻟﻮﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺠﺮ .5 .ﻓﻨﺰﻝ
ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺤﺎﺏ.ﻓﻮﻗﻒ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ
-2
Nm:12:5ﻓﻨﺰﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻤﻮﺩ ﺳﺤﺎﺏ ﻭﻭﻗﻒ ﻓﻲ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺨﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﺩﻋﺎ
ﻫﺮﻭﻥ ﻭﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﻓﺨﺮﺟﺎ ﻛﻼﻫﻤﺎ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮﻱ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﷲ ﺗﺒﺎﺭﻙ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﻧﺰﻝ ﻟﻴﺼﺎﺭﻉ ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺏ ..ﻭﻅﻞ
ﻳﺼﺎﺭﻋﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻁﻠﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺮ ..ﻭﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻥ ﻳﻐﻠﺐ ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺏ
ﻓﻜﺴﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺣﻖ ﻓﺨﺬﻩ ﻭﺃﺳﺘﻐﺎﺙ......ﺃﻁﻠﻘﻨﻲ ...ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺔ..ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺮ ﻁﻠﻊ...ﻓﻘﺎﻝ
ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺏ.....ﻟﻦ ﺃﻁﻠﻘﻚ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﺒﺎﺭﻛﻨﻲ..ﻭﺃﺿﻄﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﻟﻤﺒﺎﺭﻛﺘﻪ ﻗﺴﺮﺍ ﻭﻫﻮﻳﻘﻮﻝ
ﻟﻪ "ﺇﻧﻚ ﺟﺎﻫﺪﺕ ﻣﻊ ﷲ ﻭﻗﺪﺭﺕ"...ﻭﺳﻤﺎﻩ ﺇﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻭﻫﻲ )ﺇﺳﺮﺍﻉ..ﺇﻳﻞ( ﺃﻱ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺻﺮﻉ ﷲ ..ﻱ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ؟ ﻭﺃﻱ ﺳﺐ ہﻠﻟ ﻫﺬﺍ؟
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺳﺒﺎ....ﺃﻳﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺒﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺴﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺇﻟﻪ ؟
ﻭﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺑﺎ ﺷﻨﻮﺩﻩ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ "ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ" ﺃﺛﺒﺖ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺻﺎﺭﻉ ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺏ ﻫﻮ ﷲ ﻓﻌﻼ ﻭﺳﺎﻕ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻳﺎ ﻋﺒﺎﺩ ﷲ؟ ﻳﻨﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻨﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﺎء ﻟﻜﻲ ﻻ ﻳﻐﺮﻗﻬﻢ
ﺍﻟﺮﺏ...ﻓﻴﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺨﺒﺮ ﻟﻠﺮﺏ ...ﻓﻴﻨﺰﻝ )ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﻴﺪ(...ﻓﻴﻨﺰﻝ ﻟﻴﺮﻯ
ﺍﻟﻤﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺮﺝ ..ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻮ ﻅﻠﻮﺍ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺷﻌﺐ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺳﻴﻜﻤﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﺝ ﻭﻟﻦ
ﺃﺳﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻏﺮﺍﻗﻬﻢ...ﻓﻴﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﺑﺒﻠﺒﻠﺔ ﻟﺴﺎﻧﻬﻢ ﻭﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻟﻐﺘﻬﻢ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻤﻠﻮﺍ
ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎء.
ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺳﺄﻝ......ﺃﻱ ﺇﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺧﺒﺮﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺑﻨﺎء ؟
ﻭﺃﻱ ﺇﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻤﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﺝ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﻳﺸﻴﺪﻭﻫﺎ؟
ﻭﺃﻱ ﺇﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻤﺒﺪﺃ "ﻓﺮﻕ ﺗﺴﺪ" ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺇﻟﻬﺎ ﻗﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻏﺮﺍﻕ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ؟
ﺃﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻟﻪ .......ﺳﺐ ہﻠﻟ ﻫﺬﺍ ؟....ﺍﻹﻋﺼﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺗﺴﻮﻧﺎﻣﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻴﻀﺎﻧﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺨﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﷲ ﺗﻬﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﺳﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺗﺴﻮﻳﻪ ﺑﺎﻷﺭﺽ ﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﻣﺮ
ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰﻛﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺻﺨﺮﺓ ﻛﺒﻴﺮﺓ ...ﻱ ﻛﺬﺏ ﻭﺯﻭﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺴﺒﻮﻩ ہﻠﻟ
ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺎ ﺟﺎﻫﻼ؟
ﻓﺸﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺫﺍﻙ ﻭﺷﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺭﺣﻤﺔ ﷲ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﻥ ﻳﻄﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻩ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻐﻔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭﺷﺘﻢ ﷲ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﻧﺰﻝ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﻴﺪﻩ ﻓﻴﻀﺮﺑﻪ ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺏ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﻳﻀﺮﺑﻮﻩ ﻭﻳﺼﻠﺒﻮﻩ...ﺃﻭ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻟﻴﺘﺄﻛﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﺃﺗﺎﻩ ..ﺃﻭ ﻳﺨﺎﻑ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻳﺒﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻨﺎء ﻓﻴﺸﺘﺘﻬﻢ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﻈﻞ
ﻗﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻏﺮﺍﻗﻬﻢ !!
ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻠﻔﺖ ﻟﻠﻨﻈﺮ ﺷﺊ ﺃﺧﺮ ﺭﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﺤﺐ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻟﺪﻱ
)thou shalt hand, and KJVA) And I will take away mine
.not be seen but my face shall :see my back parts
)thou and ،Bishops) And I wyll take away myne hande
.but my face shall not be seene :shalt see my backe partes
)and thou shalt see ،And I will take away my hand (DRB
.but my face thou canst not see :parts my back
)thou & ،mine hande Geneva) After I will take away
.face shal not be seene but my :shalt see my backe parts
)and thou shalt ،KJVR) And I will take away mine hand
.seen but my face shall not be :see my back parts
ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺘﻴﺐ 21ﺻﻔﺤﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ...ﻛﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﺃﺧﺮﺟﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺃﺗﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺎﺫﺍ
ﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﻴﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻼﺡ ؟
“ ﻓﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﻕ ﷲ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺯﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﻜﺬﺑﻲ ﻟﻤﺠﺪﻩ ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﺃﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﻛﺨﺎﻁﺊ()”.ﺭﻭﻣﻴﺔ (7 :3
ﻗُﻞِ ﺍﻟْﺤَﻤْﺪُ ہﻠﻟِ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬﻱ ﻟَ ْﻢ ﻳَﺘﱠ ِﺨ ْﺬ َﻭﻟَﺪﺍً َﻭﻟَﻢ ﻳَ ُﻜﻦ ﻟﱠﻪُ َ
ﺷ ِﺮﻳ ٌﻚ ﻓِﻲ ﺍ ْﻟ ُﻤ ْﻠ ِﻚ َﻭﻟَ ْﻢ ﻳَ ُﻜﻦ ﻟﱠﻪُ ِّ
ﺍﻟﺬ ﱠﻝ َﻭ َﻛﺒﱢ ْﺮﻩُ ﺗَ ْﻜﺒِﻴﺮﺍً )ﺍﻹﺳﺮﺍء ( 111 : َﻭﻟِ ﱞﻲ ﱢﻣ َﻦ ﱡ
-3 -
ﺃﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ "ﺻﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ"
ﺻﻠَﺒُﻮﻩُ ﷲِ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﻗَﺘَﻠُﻮﻩُ َﻭ َﻣﺎ َ ﺳﻮ َﻝ ّ ﺴﻰ ﺍ ْﺑ َﻦ َﻣ ْﺮﻳَ َﻢ َﺭ ُ
ﻴﺢ ِﻋﻴ َﺴ َ َﻭﻗَ ْﻮﻟِ ِﻬ ْﻢ ﺇِﻧﱠﺎ ﻗَﺘَ ْﻠﻨَﺎ ﺍ ْﻟ َﻤ ِ
ﺍﺧﺘَﻠَﻔُﻮ ْﺍ ﻓِﻴ ِﻪ ﻟَﻔِﻲ ﺷَﻚﱟ ﱢﻣ ْﻨﻪُ َﻣﺎ ﻟَ ُﻬﻢ ﺑِ ِﻪ ِﻣﻦْ ِﻋ ْﻠ ٍﻢ ﺇِﻻﱠ ﻳﻦ ْﺷﺒﱢﻪَ ﻟَ ُﻬ ْﻢ َﻭﺇِﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ َﻭﻟَـ ِﻜﻦ ُ
ﷲُ َﻋ ِﺰﻳﺰﺍً َﺣ ِﻜﻴﻤﺎ ً ﺎﻥ ّ ﺍﺗﱢﺒَﺎ َﻉ ﺍﻟﻈﱠﻦﱢ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﻗَﺘَﻠُﻮﻩُ ﻳَﻘِﻴﻨﺎ ً * ﺑَﻞ ﱠﺭﻓَ َﻌﻪُ ّ
ﷲُ ﺇِﻟَ ْﻴ ِﻪ َﻭ َﻛ َ
)ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎء ( 158 :
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻧﻲ ﻻ ﺃﺭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻴﺒﺎﺕ ﺭﺩﺍ ﻛﻠﻴﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﻡ ﺃﻗﺘﺼﺮ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺃﻛﺎﺫﻳﺒﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﻴﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﻁﻠﺖ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺛﻨﺘﻴﻦ
ﻓﺈﻋﺬﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﻓﻴﺪﻱ ﺗﺄﻛﻠﻨﻲ ﻹﻓﺤﻤﻪ !
ﺗﺨﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﻛﺜﻴﺮﻳﻦ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻛﺘﺒﻮﺍ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﺿﺨﻤﺎ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺤﺪﺙ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﻢ ﺯﻝ
ﻟﺴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺣﻜﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ ؟! ﺛﻢ ﺟﺎء ﻣﻌﻠﻤﻜﻢ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻜﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﺗﺠﻠﻰ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺑﺪﺃ ﻳﻌﻠﻤﻜﻢ ﺃﺷﻴﺎء ﻟﻢ ﻳﺤﺪﺙ ﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﻟﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ
ﺳﻬﻮﺍ ﺃﻭ ﺯﻟﺔ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻬﺮﺍء؟!
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻭﺑﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺃﻏﻔﻠﻪ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء
ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺎﻟﺤﻴﻦ ﻵﻻﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺳﻤﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ...ﻓﻴﺎﻟﻌﻘﻮﻟﻜﻢ !!
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ )) ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻧﺠﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﻳﻐﺮﻯ ﺣﻮﺍء ﻓﺘﺄﻛﻞ
ﻭﺗﻌﻄﻰ ﺯﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ً "ﻓﺄﺧﺬﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻤﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﺃﻛﻠﺖ ،ﻭﺃﻋﻄﺖ ﺭﺟﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ً
ﻓﺄﻛﻞ" )ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ(6 :3
ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺃﺧﻄﺄ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺇﺫ ﻋﺼﻰ ﻭﺻﻴﺔ ﷲ ﻭﺃﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺩﺧﻠﺖ
ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ((.
ﺇﺫﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺣﻮﺍء ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﺃﺿﻞ ﺳﺒﻴﻼ ...ﻓﻠﻢ ﻟﻢ ﺗﺄﺗﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﻠﺼﺔ ﺃﻣﺮﺃﺓ
ﻟﻜﻲ ﺗﻜﻔﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺧﻄﻴﺌﺔ ﺃﻣﻬﺎ ؟
ﻭﻟﻢ ﺟﺎء ﻣﺨﻠﺼﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺇﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻌﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﺊ ﺑﺎﻟﺨﻄﻴﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﻧﺴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺗﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺟﻞ ﺑﻼ ﺃﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻞ
ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻌﻮﻥ ؟
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻭﻗﺮﺃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ
ﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﺎﻫﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻲ ﺃﺻﺒﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﺤﻠﻘﺔ ﻛﻮﻣﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﻭﷲ ﺿﺤﻜﺖ ﺑﻤﻠﺊ ﻓﻴﻲ
ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺿﺤﻜﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻛﻠﺘﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺎ !
ﻭﻧﺎﻫﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻲ ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻪ :ﻷ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﻮﻧﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺴﺆﻭﻝ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ !
ﻗﺎﻝ "ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺮﻭﺽ ﻳﻘﻠﻬﺎ "ﻣﺶ ﻫﺄﻛﻞ ...ﺃﺧﻄﺌﻲ ﺇﻧﺖ ﻟﻮﺣﺪﻙ ﻳﺎ ﻭﻟﻴﺔ "!..
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺓ ﺳﺄﺭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﻭﺗﻠﻤﻴﺬﻩ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ..ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ
ﺑﺎﺭﺍ ﻭﻻ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ؟
Mt:1:19ﻓﻴﻮﺳﻒ ﺭﺟﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﺫ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺍ ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﺸﺄ ﺍﻥ ﻳﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺩ ﺗﺨﻠﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺳﺮّﺍ.
)(SVD
Lk:23:50ﻭﺍﺫﺍ ﺭﺟﻞ ﺍﺳﻤﻪ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﻴﺮﺍ ﻭﺭﺟﻼ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﺍ.
)(SVD
Gn:6:9ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﻮﺡ.ﻛﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﺡ ﺭﺟﻼ ﺑﺎﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺟﻴﺎﻟﻪ.ﻭﺳﺎﺭ ﻧﻮﺡ
ﻣﻊ ﷲ(SVD) .
Gn:18:26ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺍﻥ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﻓﻲ ﺳﺪﻭﻡ ﺧﻤﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﺍ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﻓﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﺻﻔﺢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺎﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺟﻠﻬﻢ(SVD) .
ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻌﺠﺒﻪ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ " ...ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻭﻻ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﺍﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﺯﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻭﻓﺴﺪﻭﺍ ﻣﻌﺎ ً" )ﺭﻭﻣﻴﺔ.(10 :3
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺕ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻹﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻳﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﻓﻘﺎﻝ "ﻭ.....ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ " ﻓﻘﺎﻟﺖ ﻟﻪ ﻧﺎﻫﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻲ "ﺃﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺏ"
ﻓﻴﺎ ﻟﻬﺆﻻء ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺮﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﺗﻲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻗﻄﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺏ ﺫﻭ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ
ﺍﻷﺳﻮﺩ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻟﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺒﻲ ﷲ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ
Mt:22:32ﺍﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﻪ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ )(SVD
ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﻲ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ )) :ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻬﻢ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﻟﻮ ﻛﻨﺘﻢ ﺍﻭﻻﺩ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻟﻜﻨﺘﻢ ﺗﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ
ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ) .ﻳﻮﺣﻨﺎ ( 39 : 8
ﻚ ِﻣ َﻦ ْﺍﻟ ُﻤ ْﺸ ِﺮ ِﻛ َ
ﻴﻦ )ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ ( 120 : ِّ
ﻥﱠ ﺇِﺑْﺮَﺍﻫِﻴﻢَ ﻛَﺎﻥَ ﺃُﻣﱠﺔً ﻗَﺎﻧِﺘﺎً ہﻠﻟِ َﺣﻨِﻴﻔﺎ ً َﻭﻟَ ْﻢ ﻳَ ُ
ﻚﺖ َﻭﺇِ ْﺳ َﻤﺎ ِﻋﻴ ُﻞ َﺭﺑﱠﻨَﺎ ﺗَﻘَﺒﱠﻞْ ِﻣﻨﱠﺎ ﺇِﻧﱠ َ ﻗﺎﻝ ﷲ ) َﻭﺇِ ْﺫ ﻳَﺮْ ﻓَ ُﻊ ﺇِ ْﺑ َﺮﺍ ِﻫﻴ ُﻢ ْﺍﻟﻘَ َﻮﺍ ِﻋ َﺪ ِﻣ َﻦ ْﺍﻟﺒَ ْﻴ ِ
ﻚ َﻭ ِﻣ ْﻦ ُﺫﺭﱢ ﻳﱠﺘِﻨَﺎ ﺃُ ﱠﻣﺔً ُﻣ ْﺴﻠِ َﻤﺔً ﺖ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺴ ِﻤﻴ ُﻊ ْﺍﻟ َﻌﻠِﻴ ُﻢ ) َ (127ﺭﺑﱠﻨَﺎ َﻭﺍﺟْ َﻌ ْﻠﻨَﺎ ُﻣ ْﺴﻠِ َﻤﻴ ِْﻦ ﻟَ َ ﺃَ ْﻧ َ
ﺚ ﱠﺣﻴ ُﻢ ) َ (128ﺭﺑﱠﻨَﺎ َﻭﺍ ْﺑ َﻌ ْ ﺖ ﺍﻟﺘﱠ ﱠﻮﺍﺏُ ﺍﻟﺮ ِ ﻚ ﺃَ ْﻧ َﺎﺳ َﻜﻨَﺎ َﻭﺗُﺐْ َﻋﻠَ ْﻴﻨَﺎ ﺇِﻧﱠ َ ﻚ َﻭﺃَ ِﺭﻧَﺎ َﻣﻨَ ِ ﻟَ َ
ﻚﺎﺏ َﻭ ْﺍﻟ ِﺤ ْﻜ َﻤﺔَ َﻭﻳُ َﺰ ﱢﻛﻴ ِﻬ ْﻢ ﺇِﻧﱠ َ ﻚ َﻭﻳُ َﻌﻠﱢ ُﻤﻬُ ُﻢ ْﺍﻟ ِﻜﺘَ َ ﻓِﻴ ِﻬ ْﻢ َﺭﺳُﻮﻻً ِﻣ ْﻨﻬُ ْﻢ ﻳَ ْﺘﻠُﻮ َﻋﻠَ ْﻴ ِﻬ ْﻢ ﺁﻳَﺎﺗِ َ
ﺖ ْﺍﻟ َﻌ ِﺰﻳ ُﺰ ْﺍﻟ َﺤ ِﻜﻴ ُﻢ ) َ (129ﻭ َﻣ ْﻦ ﻳَﺮْ َﻏﺐُ َﻋ ْﻦ ِﻣﻠﱠ ِﺔ ﺇِ ْﺑ َﺮﺍ ِﻫﻴ َﻢ ﺇِ ﱠﻻ َﻣ ْﻦ َﺳﻔِﻪَ ﻧَ ْﻔ َﺴﻪُ ﺃَ ْﻧ َ
ﻴﻦ ) (130ﺇِ ْﺫ ﻗَﺎ َﻝ ﻟَﻪُ َﻭﻟَﻘَ ِﺪ ﺍﺻْ ﻄَﻔَ ْﻴﻨَﺎﻩُ ﻓِﻲ ﺍﻟ ﱡﺪ ْﻧﻴَﺎ َﻭﺇِﻧﱠﻪُ ﻓِﻲ ْﺍﻵ ِﺧ َﺮ ِﺓ ﻟَ ِﻤ َﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﱠﺎﻟِ ِﺤ َ
ﻴﻦ ) َ (131ﻭ َﻭﺻﱠﻰ ﺑِﻬَﺎ ﺇِ ْﺑ َﺮﺍ ِﻫﻴ ُﻢ ﺑَﻨِﻴ ِﻪ ﺖ ﻟِ َﺮﺏﱢ ْﺍﻟ َﻌﺎﻟَ ِﻤ َ َﺭﺑﱡﻪُ ﺃَ ْﺳﻠِ ْﻢ ﻗَﺎ َﻝ ﺃَ ْﺳﻠَ ْﻤ ُ
ﻮﻥﻳﻦ ﻓَﻼ ﺗَ ُﻤﻮﺗُ ﱠﻦ ﺇِ ﱠﻻ َﻭﺃَ ْﻧﺘُ ْﻢ ُﻣ ْﺴﻠِ ُﻤ َ ﷲَ ﺍﺻْ ﻄَﻔَﻰ ﻟَ ُﻜ ُﻢ ﺍﻟ ﱢﺪ َ ﻲ ﺇِ ﱠﻥ ﱠ َﻭﻳَ ْﻌﻘُﻮﺏُ ﻳَﺎ ﺑَﻨِ ﱠ
ﻭﻥ ِﻣ ْﻦ ﺕ ﺇِ ْﺫ ﻗَﺎ َﻝ ﻟِﺒَﻨِﻴ ِﻪ َﻣﺎ ﺗَ ْﻌﺒُ ُﺪ َ ﻮﺏ ْﺍﻟ َﻤ ْﻮ ُﻀ َﺮ ﻳَ ْﻌﻘُ َ ) (132ﺃَ ْﻡ ُﻛ ْﻨﺘُ ْﻢ ُﺷﻬَ َﺪﺍ َء ﺇِ ْﺫ َﺣ َ
ﺍﺣﺪﺍً ﻕ ﺇِﻟَﻬﺎ ً َﻭ ِ ﻚ ﺇِ ْﺑ َﺮﺍ ِﻫﻴ َﻢ َﻭﺇِ ْﺳ َﻤﺎ ِﻋﻴ َﻞ َﻭﺇِ ْﺳ َﺤﺎ َ ﻚ َﻭﺇِﻟَﻪَ ﺁﺑَﺎﺋِ َ ﺑَ ْﻌ ِﺪﻱ ﻗَﺎﻟُﻮﺍ ﻧَ ْﻌﺒُ ُﺪ ﺇِﻟَﻬَ َ
ﺖ َﻭﻟَ ُﻜ ْﻢ َﻣﺎ َﻛ َﺴ ْﺒﺘُ ْﻢ َﻭﻻ ﺖ ﻟَﻬَﺎ َﻣﺎ َﻛ َﺴﺒَ ْ ﻚ ﺃُ ﱠﻣﺔٌ ﻗَ ْﺪ َﺧﻠَ ْ ﻮﻥ ) (133ﺗِ ْﻠ َ َﻭﻧَﺤْ ُﻦ ﻟَﻪُ ُﻣ ْﺴﻠِ ُﻤ َ
ﺼﺎ َﺭﻯ ﺗَ ْﻬﺘَ ُﺪﻭﺍ ﻗُﻞْ ﻮﻥ ) َ (134ﻭﻗَﺎﻟُﻮﺍ ُﻛﻮﻧُﻮﺍ ﻫُﻮﺩﺍً ﺃَ ْﻭ ﻧَ َ ﻟﻮﻥ َﻋ ﱠﻤﺎ َﻛﺎﻧُﻮﺍ ﻳَ ْﻌ َﻤﻠُ َ ﺗُﺴْﺄ َ َ
ﱠ
ﻮﻟُﻮﺍ ﺁﻣَﻨﱠﺎ ﺑِﺎہﻠﻟِ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﻴﻦ ) (135 ﺎﻥ ِﻣ َﻦ ْﺍﻟ ُﻤ ْﺸ ِﺮ ِﻛ َ ﺑَﻞْ ِﻣﻠﱠﺔَ ﺇِ ْﺑ َﺮﺍ ِﻫﻴ َﻢ َﺣﻨِﻴﻔﺎ ً َﻭ َﻣﺎ َﻛ َ
ﺎﻁ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﻮﺏ َﻭ ْﺍﻷَ ْﺳﺒَ ِ ﻕ َﻭﻳَ ْﻌﻘُ َ ﺃُ ْﻧ ِﺰ َﻝ ﺇِﻟَ ْﻴﻨَﺎ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﺃُ ْﻧ ِﺰ َﻝ ﺇِﻟَﻰ ﺇِ ْﺑ َﺮﺍ ِﻫﻴ َﻢ َﻭﺇِ ْﺳ َﻤﺎ ِﻋﻴ َﻞ َﻭﺇِ ْﺳ َﺤﺎ َ
ﻕ ﺑَﻴ َْﻦ ﺃَ َﺣ ٍﺪ ِﻣ ْﻨﻬُ ْﻢ ﱡﻮﻥ ِﻣ ْﻦ َﺭﺑﱢ ِﻬ ْﻢ ﻻ ﻧُﻔَ ﱢﺮ ُ ﺃُﻭﺗِ َﻲ ُﻣﻮ َﺳﻰ َﻭ ِﻋﻴ َﺴﻰ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﺃُﻭﺗِ َﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺒِﻴ َ
ﻮﻥ ) (136ﻓَﺈِ ْﻥ ﺁ َﻣﻨُﻮﺍ ﺑِ ِﻤ ْﺜ ِﻞ َﻣﺎ ﺁ َﻣ ْﻨﺘُ ْﻢ ﺑِ ِﻪ ﻓَﻘَ ِﺪ ﺍ ْﻫﺘَ َﺪ ْﻭﺍ َﻭﺇِ ْﻥ ﺗَ َﻮﻟﱠ ْﻮﺍ َﻭﻧَﺤْ ُﻦ ﻟَﻪُ ُﻣ ْﺴﻠِ ُﻤ َ
ﷲِ َﻭ َﻣ ْﻦ ﷲُ َﻭﻫُ َﻮ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺴ ِﻤﻴ ُﻊ ْﺍﻟ َﻌﻠِﻴ ُﻢ ) ِ (137
ﺻ ْﺒ َﻐﺔَ ﱠ ﻕ ﻓَ َﺴﻴَ ْﻜﻔِﻴ َﻜﻬُ ُﻢ ﱠﻓَﺈِﻧﱠ َﻤﺎ ﻫُ ْﻢ ﻓِﻲ ِﺷﻘَﺎ ٍ
ﷲِ َﻭﻫُ َﻮ ﻭﻥ ) (138ﻗُﻞْ ﺃَﺗُ َﺤﺎﺟﱡ ﻮﻧَﻨَﺎ ﻓِﻲ ﱠ ﺻ ْﺒ َﻐﺔً َﻭﻧَﺤْ ُﻦ ﻟَﻪُ َﻋﺎﺑِ ُﺪ َ ﷲِ ِ ﺃَﺣْ َﺴ ُﻦ ِﻣ َﻦ ﱠ
ُﻮﻥ ) (139ﺃَ ْﻡ ﺗَﻘُﻮﻟُ َ
ﻮﻥ َﺭﺑﱡﻨَﺎ َﻭ َﺭﺑﱡ ُﻜ ْﻢ َﻭﻟَﻨَﺎ ﺃَ ْﻋ َﻤﺎﻟُﻨَﺎ َﻭﻟَ ُﻜ ْﻢ ﺃَ ْﻋ َﻤﺎﻟُ ُﻜ ْﻢ َﻭﻧَﺤْ ُﻦ ﻟَﻪُ ُﻣ ْﺨﻠِﺼ َ
ﺼﺎ َﺭﻯ ﻗُﻞْ ﻮﺏ َﻭ ْﺍﻷَ ْﺳﺒَﺎﻁَ َﻛﺎﻧُﻮﺍ ﻫُﻮﺩﺍً ﺃَ ْﻭ ﻧَ َ ﻕ َﻭﻳَ ْﻌﻘُ َ ﺇِ ﱠﻥ ﺇِ ْﺑ َﺮﺍ ِﻫﻴ َﻢ َﻭﺇِ ْﺳ َﻤﺎ ِﻋﻴ َﻞ َﻭﺇِ ْﺳ َﺤﺎ َ
ﷲُ ﺑِ َﻐﺎﻓِ ٍﻞ َﻋ ﱠﻤﺎ ﷲِ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﱠ ﻅﻠَ ُﻢ ِﻣ ﱠﻤ ْﻦ َﻛﺘَ َﻢ َﺷﻬَﺎ َﺩﺓً ِﻋ ْﻨ َﺪﻩُ ِﻣ َﻦ ﱠ ﷲُ َﻭ َﻣ ْﻦ ﺃَ ْ ﺃَﺃَ ْﻧﺘُ ْﻢ ﺃَ ْﻋﻠَ ُﻢ ﺃَ ِﻡ ﱠ
ﺖ َﻭﻟَ ُﻜ ْﻢ َﻣﺎ َﻛ َﺴ ْﺒﺘُ ْﻢ َﻭﻻ ﺗُﺴْﺄ َ َ
ﻟﻮﻥ ﺖ ﻟَﻬَﺎ َﻣﺎ َﻛ َﺴﺒَ ْ ﻚ ﺃُ ﱠﻣﺔٌ ﻗَ ْﺪ َﺧﻠَ ْﻮﻥ ) (140ﺗِ ْﻠ َ ﺗَ ْﻌ َﻤﻠُ َ
ﻮﻥ ) (141ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ َﻋ ﱠﻤﺎ َﻛﺎﻧُﻮﺍ ﻳَ ْﻌ َﻤﻠُ َ
ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻟﻦ ﺃﺳﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺻﻌﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻬﻤﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ
ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻘﻠﻪ ﺳﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻴﺴﺘﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﻭﻟﻬﺬﺍ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﻌﻪ ))ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻐﻔﺮﺓ ﺇﻥ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﻄﺄ
ﻓﻌﻼً؟(((
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺫﻧﻮﺏ ﻟﻸﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﺗﺮﻙ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻲ
ﺒﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﻄﻠﻖ ہﻠﻟ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ..ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ؟
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻧﻮﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻘﻬﻢ ..ﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ!
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻚ ﺃﻱ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺇﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ !
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻟﺴﺎﻧﻚ ﺃﺩﻳﻨﻚ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺮ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺮﺍﺭ ﺳﺆﺍﻟﻚ
))ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻐﻔﺮﺓ ﺇﻥ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﻄﺄ ﻓﻌﻼً؟(((
ﺃﺳﺄﻟﻚ
ﻫﻞ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻌﻤﺪ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻔﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﺎﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﺇﻥ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ
ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﻄﺄ ﻓﻌﻼ؟
ﻓﻤﺎ ﻗﻮﻟﻚ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻧﻔﺴﻚ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻔﺤﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ
ﺇﻟﻬﻚ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﷲ ﻳﺘﻮﺏ ﻭﻳﺘﻌﻤﺪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﻣﻐﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﺎﻳﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻳﻌﻤﺪﻩ
ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻗﺎﺗﻪ ؟
ﻓﻬﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺃ ﺑﺎﻝ-...ﻻ ﺃﺭﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻹﻟﻮﻫﻴﺔ ﺭﺑﻤﺎ -ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﺑﻦ ﺛﻼﺛﻴﻦ
ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﺪ ﻟﻤﻐﻔﺮﺓ ﺧﻄﻴﺌﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﻳﻮﺣﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻤﺪﺍﻥ ..ﻓﻤﺎ ﻗﻮﻟﻚ ﻳﺎ
ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ؟
ﻣﺘﻰ 1: 7ﻻ ﺗﺪﻳﻨﻮﺍ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻻ ﺗﺪﺍﻧﻮﺍ ﻻﻧﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻳﻨﻮﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺗﺪﻳﻨﻮﻥ
ﺗﺪﺍﻧﻮﻥ.ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﻴﻠﻮﻥ ﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﻟﻜﻢ
ﻭﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻋﻠﻤﻜﻢ ﺇﻳﺎﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ )) Mt:6:12ﻭﺍﻏﻔﺮ
ﻟﻨﺎ ﺫﻧﻮﺑﻨﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﻐﻔﺮ ﻧﺤﻦ ﺍﻳﻀﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺬﻧﺒﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻨﺎ 13 .ﻭﻻ ﺗﺪﺧﻠﻨﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﺔ.ﻟﻜﻦ
ﻧﺠﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺮ )(SVD
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﺅﺓ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺼﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ
Ps:22:1ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﻟﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﺗﺮﻛﺘﻨﻲ.ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺧﻼﺻﻲ 2 .ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ
ﺍﺩﻋﻮ ﻓﻼ ﺗﺴﺘﺠﻴﺐ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﺩﻋﻮ ﻓﻼ ﻫﺪﻭء ﻟﻲ(SVD) .
Mt:26:39ﺛﻢ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ﻭﺧ ّﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺼﻠّﻲ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﺎﻩ ﺍﻥ
ﺍﻣﻜﻦ ﻓﻠﺘﻌﺒﺮ ﻋﻨﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺱ.ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﺖ.
ﻪ ﻳﺼﻠﻰ ہﻠﻟ ﻭﻳﺴﺠﺪ ﻟﻪ....ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﷲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ...ﻟﻤﻦ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺼﻠﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ؟
ﺛﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻦ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺑﻌﻤﻠﻪ ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺣﻤﺔ ﷲ
..ﺣﺘﻰ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ..ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻔﺘﺮﺽ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺻﺪﻕ
ﻓﺎﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺑﺔ ﻳﻌﻈﻤﻮﻥ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ..ﻭﺇﺑﺤﺚ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺗﺠﺪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﻢ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﻟﻰ
ﺇﺩﻋﺎء ﺍﻹﻟﻮﻫﻴﺔ !
ﻓﺒﺪﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺻﺪﻕ ﻭﻓﻌﻼ ﻭﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﻋﻦ
ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ )) Jn:7:14ﻭﻟﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻳﺩ ﻗﺩ ﺍﻧﺗﺻﻑ ﺻﻌﺩ ﻳﺳﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﻰ
ﺍﻟﻬﻳﻛﻝ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﻠّﻡ 15.ﻓﺗﻌﺟﺏ ﺍﻟﻳﻬﻭﺩ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻳﻥ ﻛﻳﻑ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻳﻌﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﻛﺗﺏ ﻭﻫﻭ ﻟﻡ
ﻳﺗﻌﻠّﻡ 16.ﺍﺟﺎﺑﻬﻡ ﻳﺳﻭﻉ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﻠﻳﻣﻲ ﻟﻳﺱ ﻟﻲ ﺑﻝ ﻟﻠﺫﻱ ﺍﺭﺳﻠﻧﻲ 17.ﺍﻥ ﺷﺎء
ﺍﺣﺩ ﺍﻥ ﻳﻌﻣﻝ ﻣﺷﻳﺋﺗﻪ ﻳﻌﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﺗﻌﻠﻳﻡ ﻫﻝ ﻫﻭ ﻣﻥ ﷲ ﺍﻡ ﺍﺗﻛﻠﻡ ﺍﻧﺎ ﻣﻥ ﻧﻔﺳﻲ18.
ﻣﻥ ﻳﺗﻛﻠﻡ ﻣﻥ ﻧﻔﺳﻪ ﻳﻁﻠﺏ ﻣﺟﺩ ﻧﻔﺳﻪ.ﻭﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻥ ﻳﻁﻠﺏ ﻣﺟﺩ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﺍﺭﺳﻠﻪ ﻓﻬﻭ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﻭﻟﻳﺱ ﻓﻳﻪ ﻅﻠﻡ((.
ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﺗﻔﻬﻢ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ؟...ﻟﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻞ ﺑﻤﻜﻴﺎﻟﻴﻦ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ
ﺟﻬﻞ؟؟.....ﻟﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ؟
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ 11
)) ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﻟﻮﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻷﺑﻮﻳﻦ ﻻﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺛﻮﺍ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﻤﺎ
ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻁﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺴﺘﻮﺟﺐ ﺣﻜﻢ ﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﻮﺕ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ " ﻓﻰ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻳﻤﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ )ﻛﻮ (( . (22 :15
ﻻﺣﻆ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﺆﻳﺪ ﻓﻜﺮﻩ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺒﻮﻟﺲ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺨﺘﺮﻉ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ
ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺪﺍء ﺑﻜﺎﻣﻠﻪ ﻭﻟﻢ ﺗﺰﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺳﻬﻮﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء
ﻭﻛﺄﻧﻬﻢ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺴﻤﻌﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺌﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺟﻴﻨﺎﺗﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺁﺩﻡ؟ ﻋﺠﺒﺎ !
ﻭﺻﺪﻕ ﺭﺑﻬﻢ ﺇﺫ ﺳﻤﺎﻫﻢ ﺿﺎﻟﻴﻦ ! ﻭﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻬﻢ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ 11
))ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ" :ﺍﻟﺒﺮ ﻳﺮﻓﻊ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻋﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺔ"
)ﺃﻣﺜﺎﻝ (34 :14ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺼﺔ ﺷﻤﺸﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺠﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﺗﺮﻙ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﻴﺸﻬﺎ ﻭﺳﻘﻂ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﺔ ﻓﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﺣﺪﺙ
ﻟﻪ؟ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﻴﻨﻴﻪ ﻭﺩﺍﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺣﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﺤﻴﻮﺍﻥ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻬﺰﺃﻭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻏﻄﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺨﺰﻱ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻌﻨﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﻮﺕ ﺍﻷﺩﺑﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺤﻞ ﺑﺎﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺣﺘﻤﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﻄﻴﺔ((
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺼﺔ ﺷﻤﺸﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺠﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺃﻟﻔﺎ ﺑﻔﻚ ﺣﻤﺎﺭ ..ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻧﻲ
ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻋﺮ ﻣﻊ ﻛﻞ ﺃﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﻳﻠﻘﺎﻫﺎ ...ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺬﻣﻪ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻭﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ!
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﻳﻤﺪﺣﻪ ﺃﻳﻤﺎ ﻣﺪﺣﺎ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ
Heb:11:32ﻭﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﺍﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻳﻀﺎ ﻻﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﻮﺯﻧﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﺒﺮﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺟﺪﻋﻮﻥ
ﻭﺑﺎﺭﺍﻕ ﻭﺷﻤﺸﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻭﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﻭﺻﻤﻮﺋﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﻴﺎء 33ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻤﺎﻥ
ﻗﻬﺮﻭﺍ ﻣﻤﺎﻟﻚ ﺻﻨﻌﻮﺍ ﺑﺮﺍ ﻧﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻣﻮﺍﻋﻴﺪ ﺳﺪﻭﺍ ﺍﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﺳﻮﺩ )(SVD
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﻳﻤﻜﻨﻜﻢ ﺗﺒﺮﺋﺔ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺠﻬﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ..ﻓﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺮﺍﻧﻴﺔ
ﺇﺟﻤﺎﻋﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻛﺎﺗﺒﻬﺎ )ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺃﻭﻟﻬﺎ
ﺗﺎﺩﺭﻭﺱ ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺏ ﻣﻠﻄﻲ(
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪﷲ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ":ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺜﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺌﺔ ﺧﺰﻳﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﺭﺍ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻷﻛﺒﺮ ﻫﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ"
)ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﺎﻹﻧﺠﻠﻴﺰﻳﺔ ﺹ (( (1188
ﻓﻤﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﺃﻥ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻭﺑﻨﻴﻪ ﺇﺫ ﺍﺧﻄﺄﻭﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻘﻮﺍ ﻧﺎﺭ ﺟﻬﻨﻢ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺕ ﺍﻷﺑﺪﻱ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺟﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺣﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻮﺕ ﺍﻷﺩﺑﻲ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ(( .
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺎﻫﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻲ –ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺷﺮﺑﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺎﺽ -ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﺤﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﻗﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺒﺘﻮﺭﺓ "ﻭﺇﻥ ﻣﻨﻜﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﻫﺎ" ﺛﻢ ﻗﺎﻟﺖ ﻷ
ﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﻣﺶ ﻛﺪﻩ !!
ﻭﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﻳﺸﻔﻲ !
ﺛﻢ ﺩﺧﻞ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻓﻲ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺃﺧﺮ ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﺭﻛﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺧﻄﺎﻳﺎ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻭﺣﻮﺍء ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮﻳﺔ
ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺩﺧﻞ ﻓﻲ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻔﺮﺓ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ))ﺃﻭﻻً:ﷲ ﺭﺣﻮﻡ ﻏﻔﻮﺭ
ﻓﺎﻟﺮﺣﻤﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﷲ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﺤﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺂﻳﺎﺕ
ﻋﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻧﻜﺘﻔﻲ ﺑﺎﻵﻳﺔ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ :
"ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺭﺣﻴﻢ ﺭﺅﻑ ..ﻏﺎﻓﺮ ﺍﻹﺛﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻌﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺔ ")ﺧﺮﻭﺝ -6 :34
(( .(7
ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﺿﺪﻩ ﻁﺒﻌﺎ ﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﺗﺨﺒﻄﻬﻢ ﻭﺗﺆﻛﺪ ﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﻳﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺒﻮﻟﺲ ﻭﻓﻘﻂ!..
ﻁﺎﻟﻤﺎ ﷲ ﻏﻔﻮﺭ ﺭﺣﻴﻢ ...ﻭﺁﺩﻡ ﺗﺎﺏ...ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﷲ ﺳﻴﻐﻔﺮ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻳﺨﻠﺺ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﻭﻻ ﻳﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﺤﺮ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺇﺑﻨﻪ ﺛﻢ ﻳﺒﻜﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ؟!
"ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺭﺣﻴﻢ ﺭﺅﻑ ..ﻏﺎﻓﺮ ﺍﻹﺛﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻌﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺔ ")ﺧﺮﻭﺝ -6 :34
.(7
ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ !!...
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ 15
))ﺧﻼﺹ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻭﺑﻨﻴﻪ
ﻣﻨﺎﻁ ﺇﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺳﻔﻚ ﺩﻣﻪ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﺩﻭﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ
"ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ" ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻁﻞ ﻷﻭﺟﻪ:
ﺃﻭﻟﻬﺎ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﺤﻴﻢ ﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻪ "ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ" ؟
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻧﻨﻲ ﺃﺳﺄﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺩﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎء ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻓﻌﻼ ؟
ﻳﺎ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺣﻤﺔ ﻏﺎﻓﺮﺓ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻋﻔﺖ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺳﺎﻣﺤﺘﻪ ﻭﺃﺭﺟﻌﺘﻪ
ﺇﻟﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺌﺔ((..
ﺃﻳﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻴﺪﻩ ﻫﻨﺎ؟...ﺃﻳﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻟﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ؟
ﻭﷲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺤﻠﻒ ﺑﻐﻴﺮﻩ ..ﻳﺸﻌﺮﻧﻲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻒ ﻻ ﺃﺩﺭﻱ ﻟﻤﺎﺫﺍ ؟!
ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ !
ﻓﻤﺘﻰ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻭﺣﻴﺪﺍ ﻹﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ؟؟؟ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﺒﻴﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻨﻲ
ﺇﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺣﺴﺪﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻨﻲ ﺇﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ !!
ﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ "ﺇﺑﻨﻚ ﻭﺣﻴﺪﻙ ..ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺤﺒﻪ" ﻭﻫﻮ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺤﺐ ﺇﻻ
ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺎﺭﻳَﺔَ َﻭﺍ ْﺑﻨَﻬَﺎ ﻷَ ﱠﻥ ﺍﺑ َْﻦ ﻫَ ِﺬ ِﻩ ْ
»ﺍﻁ ُﺮ ْﺩ ﻫَ ِﺬ ِﻩ ْﺍﻟ َﺠ ِ ﻭﻟﻠﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ )ﻓَﻘَﺎﻟَ ْ
ﺖ ِﻹ ْﺑ َﺮﺍ ِﻫﻴ َﻢ:
ﻕ«11 .ﻓَﻘَﺒُ َﺢ ﺍ ْﻟ َﻜﻼَ ُﻡ ِﺟ ّﺪﺍً ﻓِﻲ َﻋ ْﻴﻨَ ْﻲ ﺇِ ْﺑ َﺮﺍ ِﻫﻴ َﻢ ﺙ َﻣ َﻊ ﺍ ْﺑﻨِﻲ ﺇِ ْﺳ َﺤﺎ َ ْﺍﻟ َﺠ ِ
ﺎﺭﻳَ ِﺔ ﻻَ ﻳَ ِﺮ ُ
ﻚ ِﻣ ْﻦ ﺃَﺟْ ِﻞ ْﺍﻟ ُﻐﻼَ ِﻡ َﻭ ِﻣ ْﻦ ﺐ ﺍ ْﺑﻨِ ِﻪ12 .ﻓَﻘَﺎ َﻝ ﷲُ ِﻹ ْﺑ َﺮﺍ ِﻫﻴ َﻢ» :ﻻَ ﻳَ ْﻘﺒُ ُﺢ ﻓِﻲ َﻋ ْﻴﻨَ ْﻴ َ ﺴﺒَ ِﻟِ َ
ﻕ ﻳُ ْﺪ َﻋﻰ ﻟَ َ
ﻚ ﻚ َﺳﺎ َﺭﺓُ ﺍ ْﺳ َﻤ ْﻊ ﻟِﻘَ ْﻮﻟِﻬَﺎ ﻷَﻧﱠﻪُ ﺑِﺈِ ْﺳ َﺤﺎ َ ﻚ .ﻓِﻲ ُﻛﻞﱢ َﻣﺎ ﺗَﻘُﻮ ُﻝ ﻟَ َ ﺃَﺟْ ِﻞ َﺟ ِ
ﺎﺭﻳَﺘِ َ
ﻚ« (.ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ 13 -10 :21 ﺎﺭﻳَ ِﺔ ﺃَﻳْﻀﺎ ً َﺳﺄَﺟْ َﻌﻠُﻪُ ﺃُ ﱠﻣﺔً ﻷَﻧﱠﻪُ ﻧَ ْﺴﻠُ َ
ﻧَ ْﺴ ٌﻞَ 13 .ﻭﺍﺑ ُْﻦ ْﺍﻟ َﺠ ِ
ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺤﺐ ﺇﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ !
ﻧﺮﺟﻮ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻲ "ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺎﻡ ﺷﻤﻌﻮﻥ" ﻓﻔﻴﻪ
ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻞ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻛﻼﺭﻙ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﻹﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ...ﻭﻫﻮ ﺗﻬﺎﻓﺖ ﻭﺗﻐﺎﺑﻲ ﻭﺇﺳﺘﺤﻤﺎﺭ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﻷﻧﻚ ﺃﻭﻻ ﺇﻥ ﻧﻔﻴﺖ ﺷﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﺇﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﻓﺈﻧﻚ ﺗﻄﻌﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺯﺍﻧﻲ
ﻭﻟﻄﺎﻟﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ
Mt:22:32ﺍﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﻪ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ )(SVD
ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﻲ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ )) :ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻬﻢ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﻟﻮ ﻛﻨﺘﻢ ﺍﻭﻻﺩ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻟﻜﻨﺘﻢ ﺗﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ
ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ) .ﻳﻮﺣﻨﺎ ( 39 : 8
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺿﺪ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻫﺆﻻء ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺇﻁﻔﺎء ﻧﻮﺭ ﷲ
ﺑﺄﻓﻮﺍﻫﻬﻢ
Gn:16:3ﻓﺎﺧﺬﺕ ﺳﺎﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻡ ﻫﺎﺟﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺮﻳﺔ ﺟﺎﺭﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﺸﺮ ﺳﻨﻴﻦ
ﻻﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺭﺽ ﻛﻨﻌﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻋﻄﺘﻬﺎ ﻻﺑﺮﺍﻡ ﺭﺟﻠﻬﺎ ﺯﻭﺟﺔ ﻟﻪ.
ﻭﺩﻋﻨﻲ ﺃﺳﺮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺇﻧﺠﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﺑﺎ –ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺎﺟﻴﻞ ﻗﺼﺔ ﺳﻴﺮﺓ
ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻗﺮﺑﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﺼﺤﺔ-
))ﻓﻜﻠّﻢ ﷲ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ} :ﺧﺬ ﺇﺑﻨﻚ ﺑﻜﺮﻙ ﺇﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺒﻞ
ﻟﺘﻘ ّﺪﻣﻪ ﺫﺑﻴﺤﺔ{ .ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﻜﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻟ ّﻤﺎ ﻭﻟﺪ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﺳﺒﻊ ﺳﻨﻴﻦ؟
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ :ﺇﻥ ﺧﺪﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎء ﻟﺠﻠ ّﻰ .ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﻞ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﻷﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ
ﺃﻧّﻚ ﻣﺮﺳﻞ ﻣﻦ ﷲ(( .
ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺑﺮﻗﻤﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻗﺎﻣﻮﺱ ﺳﺘﺮﻭﻧﺞ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ
ﺗﺘﺮﺟﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺰﻱ
G3875
παράκλητος
paraklē tos
par-ak'-lay-tos
An intercessor, consoler: - advocate, comforter.
ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ !
ﻟﻠﻤﺰﻳﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻨﺎ "ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺎﻡ
ﺷﻤﻌﻮﻥ"
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺩﻟﺘﻪ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺪﺍء ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ
ﺃﻱ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء !
ﻻﺣﻆ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺳﺎﻗﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ !!
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ " ))5ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻗﺪ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﻓﺎﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﺇﺫﺍً ﻣﺎﺗﻮﺍ"
) 2ﻛﻮ (14 :5ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺕ )ﻭﺍﺣﺪ( ﻓﺪﻳﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ((.
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺹ)) 7ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ:
ﻓﺎہﻠﻟ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺬﺭﺍء ﺟﺴﺪﺍً ﻭﺣﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﺣﻪ ،ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻣﻦ
ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﺴﺪ ﻫﻮ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ .ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﻪ "ﺃﺧﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ
ﺁﺧﺬﺍً ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺻﺎﺋﺮﺍً ﻓﻰ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ .ﻭﺇﺫ ﻭﺟﺪ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺌﺔ ﻛﺈﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ
ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﺃﻁﺎﻉ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺕ ﻣﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﻴﺐ" )ﻓﻴﻠﺒﻰ (( (7،8 :2
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ )) 7ﻭﻟﻬﺬﺍ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ "ﻣﺘﺒﺮﺭﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﺎﻧﺎ ﺑﻨﻌﻤﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺪﺍء
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻴﺴﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ .ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺪﻣﻪ ﷲ ﻛﻔﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻹﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻣﻪ ﻹﻅﻬﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﻩ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻟﻔﺔ" )ﺭﻭ(( (24،25 :3
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ)) 7ﺇﺫ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ" :ﻻ ﺑﺄﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻓﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻧﺤﻦ ﺑﻞ
ﺑﻤﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺭﺣﻤﺘﻪ ﺧﻠﺼﻨﺎ" )ﺗﻴﻄﺲ (( .(5 :3
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ)) 7ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ "ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﺣﺒﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ً ﻭﺃﺳﻠﻢ
ﺴﻪ ﻷﺟﻠﻨﺎ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﺎ ﻭﺫﺑﻴﺤﺔ ہﻠﻟ ﺭﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﻁﻴﺒﺔ" )ﺃﻓﺴﺲ (( (2 :5
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ )) 8ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ "ﻭﻧﺤﻦ ﺃﻣﻮﺍﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﺨﻄﺎﻳﺎ )ﺃﻱ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺕ ﻛﻌﻘﻮﺑﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﻄﻴﺔ( ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ )ﺃﻱ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻋﻨﺎ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺕ ﻭﺃﻋﻄﺎﻧﺎ
ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ( .ﻭﺃﻗﺎﻣﻨﺎ ﻣﻌﻪ )ﺃﻱ ﺑﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺕ ﺃﻗﺎﻣﻨﺎ
ﻧﺤﻦ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺔ(" )ﺃﻓﺴﺲ (6-4 :2
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ً "ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺍﺕ ﺑﻤﺠﺪ ﺍﻵﺏ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻧﺴﻠﻚ ﻧﺤﻦ
ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ً ﻓﻰ ﺟﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺎﺓ" )ﺭﻭ (( (4،5 :6
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ )) 8ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ" :ﺃﺟﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺔ ﻫﻰ ﻣﻮﺕ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﻫﺒﺔ ﷲ
ﻓﻬﻰ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺃﺑﺪﻳﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﺭﺑﻨﺎ" )ﺭﻭ (23 :6ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻧﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﻗﺪ
ﻭﻫﺒﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻷﺑﺪﻳﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﻗﺪ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﻨﺎ(( .
ﻭﻟﻬﺬﺍ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ "ﻠﻜﻮﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺤﻖ ہﻠﻟ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺩﻋﺎﻛﻢ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻣﻠﻜﻮﺗﻪ
ﻭﻣﺠﺪﻩ" )ﺃﻑ(( (12 :2
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﻴﻦ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻨﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﺋﻞ ﺗﺸﻴﺮ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺭﺍﺓ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺟﻠﻲ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ
ﺣﺮﻓﺖ ﻋﻤﺪﺍ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻄﺔ !
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺹ 10ﺑﻌﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﻄﻠﺐ ﻭﻓﺪﺍء ﺇﺑﻨﻪ ﻋﺒﺪ
ﷲ ﺑﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻓﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻬﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺤﺮﺓ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺪﺍء!!!!
ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺠﺎﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ...ﻓﻴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺒﻘﺮﻱ !!
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ )) ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ً ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺪﺍء ،ﻓﻌﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﻄﻠﺐ ﻧﺬﺭ
ﻳﺬﺑﺢ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺃﺑﻨﺎﺋﻪ ہﻠﻟ ،ﻭﻻﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻧﺬﺭﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺄ ﻟﺮﺣﻤﺔ ﷲ ،ﺣﺘﻰ ﻻ
ﻳﺬﺑﺢ ﺍﺑﻨﻪ ،ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﺰﻣﺎ ً ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺿﻰ ﻋﺪﻝ ﷲ ﺑﺘﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺢ ﻓﻰ ﺑﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﺄﻥ
ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﺪﺍء ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻨﻪ ﻟﻴﻤﻮﺕ ﻋﻮﺿﺎ ً ﻋﻨﻪ .ﺃﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ
ﺍﻟﻔﺪﺍء؟!((
ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ !
ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ !
ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺱ
))ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ :ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻋﻴﺪ ﺍﻷﺿﺤﻰ ﻓﻲ ﺑﻼﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺱ )ﻋﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺑﺎﻥ(
ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﻴﺤﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺃﺛﻨﺎء ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻮء ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ) :ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺍﺟﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺬﺑﻴﺤﺔ ﻛﻔﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻧﺒﻲ ﻭﺍﻧﺰﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻣﻨﻰ) .ﺹ (( (367
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
))ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻧﺲ ﺭﺿﻰ ﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺿﺤﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻰ ﺻﻠﻰ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺑﻜﺒﺸﻴﻦ ﺃﻣﻠﺤﻴﻦ ﺃﻗﺮﻧﻴﻦ ﺫﺑﺤﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻤﺔ )ﺟﺰء 1ﺹ (711
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺑﻴﺢ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺬﺑﺢ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺸﻴﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ •
ﻋﻨﻰ ﻭﻋﻤﻦ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻀﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺘﻲ" )ﺹ (42
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺇﺣﻴﺎء ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ :ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺰﺍﺭ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻰ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﻗﺎﻻ: •
"ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺎﻁﻤﺔ ﻗﻮﻣﻲ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺿﺤﻴﺘﻚ
ﻓﺄﺷﻬﺪﻳﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺎﻥ ﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻭﻝ ﻧﻈﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻣﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻐﻔﺮ ﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻧﻮﺑﻚ.
)ﺟﺰء 1ﺹ (243
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺇﺣﻴﺎء ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ:
ﺟﺎء ﻓﻴﻪ":ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺫﺑﺢ ﺍﻟﻬﺪﻯ )ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻀﺤﻴﺔ( ﻫﻮ ﺗﻘﺮﺏ ﺇﻟﻰ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ .ﻓﻌﻠﻴﻚ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻬﺪﻯ )ﺍﻟﻀﺤﻴﺔ( ﻭﺍﻁﻠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﻖ )ﻳﺤﺮﺭ( ﷲ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺟﺰء ﻣﻨﻪ )ﺃﻱ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻬﺪﻯ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻀﺤﻴﺔ( ﺟﺰءﺍ ﻣﻨﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ .ﻓﻜﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﺪﻯ )ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻀﺤﻴﺔ(
ﺃﻛﺒﺮ ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻩ ﺃﻭﻓﺮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﺪﺍﺅﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﺃﻋﻢ")ﺟﺰء 1ﺻﻔﺤﺔ (243
ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻟﻚ ﺟﻴﺪﺍً ﺃﻥ ﺫﺑﺎﺋﺢ ﻋﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻀﺤﻴﺔ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺪﺍء
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﻴﺮ ﻭﺑﻬﺬﺍ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺗﻀﺢ ﻟﻚ ﺍﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺪﺍء((.
ﺍﻹﺳﺘﺪﻻﻻﺕ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ "ﺇﺣﻴﺎء ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ" ﻓﻬﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ
ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻻ ﺷﺊ ﻓﻴﻪ..ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﻴﺮ ﻏﻴﺮ
ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻠﻔﻖ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺃﻻ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺪﺍء ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ!
ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﻟﻲ ﺳﺆﺍﻻ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﺑﻞ ﺇﺳﺄﻟﻪ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ!..
ﻫﻞ ﺗﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻢ ﻳﺬﺑﺢ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﻭﻑ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﺿﺤﻴﺔ ﻓﺪﺍء ﻋﻦ ﺫﺑﺢ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ؟
ﻟﻮ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺗﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺤﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺣﺒﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ !
ﻭﻫﻞ ﺗﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻏﻔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﺎﻳﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺫﺑﺢ ﺍﻷﺿﺤﻴﺔ ﻫﻞ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﻟﺬﺑﺢ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ –
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﻞ -ﺃﻡ ﺛﻮﺍﺏ ﻟﺘﻘﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺑﻪ؟
ﷲَ ﻟُﺤُﻮ ُﻣﻬَﺎ َﻭ َﻻ ِﺩ َﻣﺎ ُﺅﻫَﺎ َﻭﻟَ ِﻜﻦ ﻳَﻨَﺎﻟُﻪُ ﺍﻟﺘﱠ ْﻘ َﻮﻯ ِﻣﻨ ُﻜ ْﻢ َﻛ َﺬﻟِ َ
ﻚ َﺳ ﱠﺨ َﺮﻫَ ﺎ ﻟَ ُﻜ ْﻢ ﻟَﻦ ﻳَﻨَﺎ َﻝ ﱠ
ﻴﻦ )ﺍﻟﺤﺞ ( 37 : ﷲَ َﻋﻠَﻰ َﻣﺎ ﻫَ َﺪﺍ ُﻛ ْﻢ َﻭﺑَ ﱢﺸ ِﺮ ْﺍﻟ ُﻤﺤْ ِﺴﻨِ َ
ﻟِﺘُ َﻜﺒﱢﺮُﻭﺍ ﱠ
ﺍﻟﻤﻤﺘﻊ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﻼﻣﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﺩﻫﺎ
ﻭﻛﺮﺭﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺹ 11
))"ﻛﺘﺒﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻨﻰ ﺇﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻧﻔﺴﺎ ﺑﻐﻴﺮ ﻧﻔﺲ ]ﺃﻱ ﺑﺮﻳﺌﺎ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ
ﻧﻔﺴﺎ[ ﺃﻭ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ]ﺃﻱ ﻁﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ[ ﻓﻜﺄﻧﻤﺎ ﻗﺘﻞ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺟﻤﻴﻌﺎ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻫﺎ ﻓﻜﺄﻧﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺟﻤﻴﻌﺎ ً .ﻓﻤﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺑﻤﻮﺗﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺟﻤﻴﻌﺎً ،ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ]ﻧﻔﺴﺎ[
ﻣﻦ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻧﻔﻮﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ،ﻓﻴﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﻣﻮﺗﻪ ﻣﻮﺗﺎ ً ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﺟﻤﻴﻌﺎ ً(( .
ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ :ﺒﺎﻟﻁﺒﻊ ﺘﻔﺴﻴﺭ ﺍﻵﻴﺎﺕ ﻜﻝ ﺤﺴﺏ ﺘﻔﺴﻴﺭﻩ ﻭﻻ ﺘﻨﺘﻅﺭﻴﻥ ﺃﺤﺩ ﻴﻘﻭﻝ ﺃﻨﻪ ﻴﻘﺼﺩ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻭﻟﻜﻥ ﻴﺠﺩﻭﻥ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻜﺜﻴﺭ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺭﻴﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺼﺩ .
ﻭﻟﻜﻥ ﺃﻨﺎ ﺃﺨﺎﻁﺏ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺭﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺩﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺸﺭﻴﻥ ﻓﻬﻡ ﺃﻨﺎﺱ ﻤﺜﻘﻔﻭﻥ ﻤﺘﺤﻀﺭﻴﻥ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﻝ ﺃﺨﺫ ﺤﻴﺯﺍﹰ ﺃﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺩﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻨﻭﻟﻭﺠﻴﺎ ﺍﻨﺘﺸﺭﺕ ﻭﻜﻝ ﻭﺍﺤﺩ ﻴﻔﻜﺭ ﺒﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﻻﺒﺩ
ﻭﺃﻥ ﻴﻔﻬﻡ ﺒﻨﻔﺴﻪ … ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻴﺘﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﻴﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﻟﻠﺒﺩﻭ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺩﻴﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺩﺭ
ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺘﻬﻡ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻤﺎﻡ ﺘﻔﺎﺴﻴﺭ ﻤﻌﺎﺼﺭﻩ ﻭﻜﻝ ﺇﻨﺴﺎﻥ ﻴﺴﺘﻁﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﻴﺭ ﻭﻴﺴﺄﻝ ﻤﺎ ﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﻫﺫﺍ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ..ﺒﺎﻟﻁﺒﻊ ﺃﺨﻭﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻡ ﻟﻭ ﺴﺄﻝ ﺃﺤﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻭﺥ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺼﻴﻝ ﻻ ﺘﺴﺄﻝ … ﺇﺤﻨﺎ ﻭﻟﺩﻨﺎ
ﻫﻜﺫﺍ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻙ ﺃﻥ ﺘﺅﻤﻥ ﺒﺫﻟﻙ ﻓﻘﻁ ﻭﻟﻜﻥ ﻨﺤﻥ ﻨﻘﻭﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻤﺒﺩﺃ ﺍﻟﻔﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻀﺢ ﺠﺩﺍﹰ ﻜﻤﺎ ﺃﻨﻪ
ﻤﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻹﻨﺠﻴﻝ ﻤﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻭﻭﺍﻀﺢ ﺠﺩﺍﹰ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺭﺁﻥ (( .
ﺃﻭﻻ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﻗﻠﺔ ﺃﺩﺑﻪ ﻭﺳﻔﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺳﻠﻮﺑﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻞ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ
ﻣﻊ ﺃﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ..ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻭ ﻭﻣﺮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ...ﻭﻫﻮ
ﻻ ﻳﺮﺿﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻬﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﺭﺍﻛﺐ ﺍﻟﺤﻤﺎﺭ ؟! ﻓﻜﺄﻧﻤﺎ ﺟﺎء ﺇﻟﻬﻪ
ﺑﺎﻟﺼﺎﺭﻭﺥ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻮﻣﺒﻴﻮﺗﺮ ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﻮﻟﺪ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺰﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮ ؟!
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﺳﻠﻮﺑﻚ ﻓﺄﻧﺖ ﻭﺫﺍﻙ ﻭﺃﻅﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺧﻴﺺ ﻻ
ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺼﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺪ..ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺗﺪﻳﻨﻮﺍ ﺗﺪﺍﻧﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻴﺎﻝ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ !
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺃﻭﺭﺩﺕ ﻛﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﻲ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻦ ﺃﺿﻊ ﻟﻚ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻲ
ﺳﺄﺿﻊ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻷﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻳﻚ ﻳﺒﺼﻘﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ :
ﻗﺎﻝ ﷲ :
ﻖ ﺇِ ْﺫ ﻗَ ﱠﺮﺑَﺎ ﻗُ ْﺮﺑَﺎﻧًﺎ ﻓَﺘُﻘُﺒﱢ َﻞ ِﻣﻦْ ﺃَ َﺣ ِﺪ ِﻫ َﻤﺎ َﻭﻟَ ْﻢ ﻳُﺘَﻘَﺒﱠ ْﻞ َﻭﺍ ْﺗ ُﻞ َﻋﻠَ ْﻴ ِﻬ ْﻢ ﻧَﺒَﺄ َ ﺍ ْﺑﻨَ ْﻲ ﺁَ َﺩ َﻡ ﺑِﺎ ْﻟ َﺤ ﱢ
ﺴ ْﻄﺖَ ﺇِﻟَ ﱠﻲ ﻴﻦ ) (27ﻟَﺌِﻦْ ﺑَ َ ﷲُ ِﻣ َﻦ ﺍ ْﻟ ُﻤﺘﱠﻘِ َ ِﻣ َﻦ ْﺍﻵَ َﺧ ِﺮ ﻗَﺎ َﻝ َﻷَ ْﻗﺘُﻠَﻨﱠ َﻚ ﻗَﺎ َﻝ ﺇِﻧﱠ َﻤﺎ ﻳَﺘَﻘَﺒﱠ ُﻞ ﱠ
ﺏ ﺍ ْﻟ َﻌﺎﻟَ ِﻤ َ
ﻴﻦ ﷲَ َﺭ ﱠ ﻱ ﺇِﻟَ ْﻴ َﻚ ِﻷَ ْﻗﺘُﻠَ َﻚ ﺇِﻧﱢﻲ ﺃَ َﺧﺎﻑُ ﱠ ﻳَ َﺪ َﻙ ﻟِﺘَ ْﻘﺘُﻠَﻨِﻲ َﻣﺎ ﺃَﻧَﺎ ﺑِﺒَ ِ
ﺎﺳ ٍﻂ ﻳَ ِﺪ َ
ﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎ ِﺭ َﻭ َﺫﻟِ َﻚ َﺟ َﺰﺍ ُء ﺻ َﺤﺎ ِ ﻮﻥ ِﻣﻦْ ﺃَ ْ ) (28ﺇِﻧﱢﻲ ﺃُ ِﺭﻳ ُﺪ ﺃَﻥْ ﺗَﺒُﻮ َء ﺑِﺈِ ْﺛ ِﻤﻲ َﻭﺇِ ْﺛ ِﻤ َﻚ ﻓَﺘَ ُﻜ َ
ﻳﻦ
ﺎﺳ ِﺮ َ ﺻﺒَ َﺢ ِﻣ َﻦ ﺍ ْﻟ َﺨ ِ ﺴﻪُ ﻗَ ْﺘ َﻞ ﺃَ ِﺧﻴ ِﻪ ﻓَﻘَﺘَﻠَﻪُ ﻓَﺄ َ ْ ﻴﻦ ) (29ﻓَﻄَ ﱠﻮ َﻋﺖْ ﻟَﻪُ ﻧَ ْﻔ ُ ﺍﻟﻈﱠﺎﻟِ ِﻤ َ
ﺳ ْﻮﺃَﺓَ ﺃَ ِﺧﻴ ِﻪ ﻗَﺎ َﻝ ﻒ ﻳُ َﻮﺍ ِﺭﻱ َ ﺚ ﻓِﻲ ْﺍﻷَ ْﺭ ِ
ﺽ ﻟِﻴُ ِﺮﻳَﻪُ َﻛ ْﻴ َ ﷲُ ُﻏ َﺮﺍﺑًﺎ ﻳَ ْﺒ َﺤ ُ ﺚ ﱠ ) (30ﻓَﺒَ َﻌ َ
ﺻﺒَ َﺢ ِﻣ َﻦ ﺳ ْﻮﺃَﺓَ ﺃَ ِﺧﻲ ﻓَﺄ َ ْ ﻱ َ ﺏ ﻓَﺄ ُ َﻭﺍ ِﺭ َﻮﻥ ِﻣ ْﺜ َﻞ َﻫ َﺬﺍ ﺍ ْﻟ ُﻐ َﺮﺍ ِ ﻳَﺎ َﻭ ْﻳﻠَﺘَﺎ ﺃَ َﻋ َﺠ ْﺰﺕُ ﺃَﻥْ ﺃَ ُﻛ َ
ﺴﺎ ﺑِ َﻐ ْﻴ ِﺮ ﺳ َﺮﺍﺋِﻴ َﻞ ﺃَﻧﱠﻪُ َﻣﻦْ ﻗَﺘَ َﻞ ﻧَ ْﻔ ً ﻴﻦ ) ِ (31ﻣﻦْ ﺃَ ْﺟ ِﻞ َﺫﻟِ َﻚ َﻛﺘَ ْﺒﻨَﺎ َﻋﻠَﻰ ﺑَﻨِﻲ ﺇِ ْ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎ ِﺩ ِﻣ َ
ﺎﺱ َﺟ ِﻤﻴ ًﻌﺎ َﻭ َﻣﻦْ ﺃَ ْﺣﻴَﺎ َﻫﺎ ﻓَ َﻜﺄَﻧﱠ َﻤﺎ ﺃَ ْﺣﻴَﺎ ﺽ ﻓَ َﻜﺄَﻧﱠ َﻤﺎ ﻗَﺘَ َﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﱠ َ ﺴﺎ ٍﺩ ﻓِﻲ ْﺍﻷَ ْﺭ ِ ﺲ ﺃَ ْﻭ ﻓَ َ ﻧَ ْﻔ ٍ
ﺕ ﺛُ ﱠﻢ ﺇِﻥﱠ َﻛﺜِﻴ ًﺮﺍ ِﻣ ْﻨ ُﻬ ْﻢ ﺑَ ْﻌ َﺪ َﺫﻟِ َﻚ ﻓِﻲ ﺳﻠُﻨَﺎ ﺑِﺎ ْﻟﺒَﻴﱢﻨَﺎ ِ ﺎﺱ َﺟ ِﻤﻴ ًﻌﺎ َﻭﻟَﻘَ ْﺪ َﺟﺎ َء ْﺗ ُﻬ ْﻢ ُﺭ ُ ﺍﻟﻨﱠ َ
ﻮﻥ ) (32ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺴ ِﺮﻓُ َ ﺽ ﻟَ ُﻤ ْ ْﺍﻷَ ْﺭ ِ
ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ !
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﺗﺘﻜﺮﺭ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﻳﻜﺮﺭﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﺍ
ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ "ﺍﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻭﺣﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﻭﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﻤﻴﻢ" ﻭﻳﻜﺮﺭﻫﺎ
ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ!
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻠﻤﺆﻣﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﻔﺎﻋﺔ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ –ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ -ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻬﺪﺍء
ﻟﻬﻢ ﺷﻔﺎﻋﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻫﻠﻬﻢ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺑﺎﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ؟ ﻓﺄﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ؟
ﻮﺍ ﻛﺎﻟﺬﻳﻦ َءﺍ َﺫ ْﻭ ْﺍ
ﻮﺍ ﻻَ ﺗَ ُﻜﻮﻧُ ْ
ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﻲ ﻗﻮﻝ ﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ } :ﻳﺎﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ َءﺍ َﻣﻨُ ْ
ﺟﻴﻬﺎ ً { ] ﺍﻷﺣﺰﺍﺏ [ 69 : ﻮﺍ َﻭ َﻛ َﺎﻥ ِﻋﻨ َﺪ ﷲ َﻭ ِ
ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻓَﺒﺮﱠﺃَﻩُ ﷲ ِﻣ ﱠﻤﺎ ﻗَﺎﻟُ ْ
ﺎﺭ[ )] { (4 ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰَ } :ﻭﻫُ َﻮ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬﻱ ﻳَﺘَ َﻮﻓﱠﺎ ُﻛ ْﻢ ﺑِﺎﻟﻠﱠﻴ ِْﻞ َﻭﻳَ ْﻌﻠَ ُﻢ َﻣﺎ َﺟ َﺮﺣْ ﺘُ ْﻢ ﺑِﺎﻟﻨﱠﻬَ ِ
ﻴﻦ َﻣ ْﻮﺗِﻬَﺎ َﻭﺍﻟﱠﺘِﻲ ﻟَ ْﻢ ﺗَ ُﻤﺖْ ﺲ ِﺣ َ ﷲُ ﻳَﺘَ َﻮﻓﱠﻰ ﺍﻷ ْﻧﻔُ َ ﺍﻷﻧﻌﺎﻡ [ 60 :ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ } :ﱠ
ﺍﻷﺧ َﺮﻯ ﺇِﻟَﻰ ﺃَ َﺟ ٍﻞ ُﻣ َﺴ ًّﻤﻰ ﺕ َﻭﻳُﺮْ ِﺳ ُﻞ ْ ﻀﻰ َﻋﻠَ ْﻴﻬَﺎ ْﺍﻟ َﻤ ْﻮ َ ﻚ ﺍﻟﱠﺘِﻲ ﻗَ َ ﻓِﻲ َﻣﻨَﺎ ِﻣ َﻬﺎ ﻓَﻴُ ْﻤ ِﺴ ُ
ُﻭﻥ[ ) ] { (5ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺮ [ 42 : ﺕ ﻟِﻘَ ْﻮ ٍﻡ ﻳَﺘَﻔَ ﱠﻜﺮ َ ﻚ ﻵﻳَﺎ ٍ ﺇِ ﱠﻥ ﻓِﻲ َﺫﻟِ َ
ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﺳﺘﻮﻓﻴﺖ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻼﻥ ﻭﻭﻓﻴﺖ ﻓﻼﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻪ ! ﻭﻳﻘﺎﻝ َﻭﻓﱠﺎﻩُ ﺗَ ْﻮﻓِﻴَﺔً
ﺑﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺃﻱ ﺃﻋﻄﺎﻩ ﻭﺍﻓِﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺍ ْﺳﺘَ ْﻮﻓَﻰ ﺣﻘﱠﻪ !
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﺘﻮﻓﻴﻚ ﺑﻴﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻓﻌﻚ ﻭﺍﻹﺳﺘﻴﻔﺎء ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﻓﻊ !..
ﺇﺫﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﻓﻴﻚ ﻭﺭﺍﻓﻌﻚ ))ﺃﻯ ﻣﺘﻮﻓﻴﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻮﻓﺎﺓ ﻣﻮﺕ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﺟﺮﻳﺮ :ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺭﻓﻌﻪ((.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺪﻟﺲ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻴﻦ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻓﺎﺓ ﻫﻲ
ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺕ ﻭﻓﻘﻂ..ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻳﻔﺴﺮ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻤﺪ ہﻠﻟ !
ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺟﺎء ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ))ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺒﻌﺚ ﺣﻴﺎ!!! ((.
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ )) -1ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻯ ﻗﺎﻝ
) ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻭﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﺳﺤﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﺘﻮﻓﻴﻚ )ﺃﻯ ﻣﻤﻴﺘﻚ(
)ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻯ ﺟﺰء 2ﺹ ( 457
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﺖ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﻣﺔ ..ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺭﻳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ ﻳﻨﻘﻠﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎء ﺑﻬﺎ
ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻨﺪ ﻭﻳﻨﻘﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎء ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﺮﺟﺢ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ
ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺍﻩ ﺣﺴﻨﺎ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻀﻊ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻲ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﻛﺘﺐ
ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺼﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻮﺍﻝ !
ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻟﻠﺮﺍﺯﻱ :
ﻚ { ﺃﻱ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﻋﻤﺮﻙ ،ﻓﺤﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺃﺗﻮﻓﺎﻙ ،ﻓﻼ ﺃﺗﺮﻛﻬﻢ ))ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ } ﺇِﻧّﻲ ُﻣﺘَ َﻮﻓّﻴ َ
ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﻘﺘﻠﻮﻙ ،ﺑﻞ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺭﺍﻓﻌﻚ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺳﻤﺎﺋﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻘﺮﺑﻚ ﺑﻤﻼﺋﻜﺘﻲ ،ﻭﺃﺻﻮﻧﻚ ﻋﻦ
ﻚ { ﺃﻱ ﻣﻤﻴﺘﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻨﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺘﻠﻚ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ ُ } :ﻣﺘَ َﻮﻓّﻴ َ
،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ،ﻭﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻻ
ﻳﺼﻞ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺅﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻗﺘﻠﻪ ﺛﻢ ﺇﻧﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻛﺮﻣﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺭﻓﻌﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء
ﺛﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻭﺟﻪ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﻭﻫﺐ :ﺗﻮﻓﻲ ﺛﻼﺙ ﺳﺎﻋﺎﺕ ،ﺛﻢ
ﺭﻓﻊ ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ :ﺗﻮﻓﻲ ﺳﺒﻊ ﺳﺎﻋﺎﺕ ،ﺛﻢ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻩ ﷲ
ﻭﺭﻓﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻴﻊ ﺑﻦ ﺃﻧﺲ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﺗﻮﻓﺎﻩ ﺣﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﻌﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ،
ﺖ ﻓِﻰ َﻣﻨَﺎ ِﻣﻬَﺎ { ] ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ } :ﷲ ﻳَﺘَ َﻮﻓﱠﻰ ﺍﻷﻧﻔﺲ ِﺣ َ
ﻴﻦ ِﻣ ْﻮﺗِﻬَﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻟَ ْﻢ ﺗَ ُﻤ ْ
ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺮ (( . [ 42 :
ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﻫﻲ ﺇﻗﺘﺒﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﻓﻴﺔ !!
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺰﻳﺪﻙ ﻏﻴﻈﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﻕ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ )) ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻗﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﻭﻱ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺻﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﻮﺕ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻦ
ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺻﻌﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻼﻫﻮﺕ ،ﻷﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﺆﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﺣﺪﺙ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺳﻮﺕ
ﻓﻌﻼ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺄﺛﺮ ﺑﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻼﻫﻮﺕ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﻮﺕ ﻟﺤﻈﺔ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻻ ﻁﺮﻓﺔ ﻋﻴﻦ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻼﻫﻮﺕ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺘﺄﺛﺮ ﺑﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ...ﺇﻟﺦ
ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﻭﻯ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻏﻴﺮ
ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺻﻌﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻼﻫﻮﺕ ،ﻟﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﻧﺮﻯ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺟﻠﻴﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻗﺪ ﺻﻠﺐ ﻓﻌﻼً ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺎﺳﻮﺕ )ﻭﻧﺤﻦ ﻧﺆﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻼﻫﻮﺕ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻔﺎﺭﻕ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﻮﺕ(((.
ﻳﻜﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺑﺔ ﻭﻳﺼﺪﻗﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﻨﺴﺒﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﺒﻴﻀﺎﻭﻱ !!
ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﻭﻱ ))} َﻭﺇِ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﻓِﻴ ِﻪ {
ﻓﻲ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﻤﺎ ﻭﻗﻌﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ :ﺇﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺫﺑﺎ ً ﻓﻘﺘﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﺣﻘﺎ ً ،ﻭﺗﺮﺩﺩ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ :ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻓﺄﻳﻦ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ :ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﻭﺟﻪ
ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻤﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ
ﻳﺮﻓﻌﻨﻲ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء :ﺃﻧﻪ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء .ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻗﻮﻡ :ﺻﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﻮﺕ
ﻭﺻﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻼﻫﻮﺕ } .ﻟَﻔِﻲ َﺷ ﱟﻚ ﱢﻣ ْﻨﻪُ { ﻟﻔﻲ ﺗﺮﺩﺩ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻻ
ﻳﺘﺮﺟﺢ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻁﺮﻓﻴﻪ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺩﺩ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ
ﺃﻛﺪﻩ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ َ } :ﻣﺎ ﻟَﻬُ ْﻢ ﺑِ ِﻪ ِﻣ ْﻦ ِﻋ ْﻠ ٍﻢ ﺇِﻻﱠ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ { ((
ﻫﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺇﻗﺘﺒﺎﺳﻪ ﻣﻨﺰﻭﻉ ﻧﺰﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﻗﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ !!
ﻓﺎﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﺒﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﻴﺮ " ﺷﺒﻪ ﻟﻬﻢ" ﻫﻮ
ﺇﻟﻘﺎء ﺷﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺮ!! ﺑﻞ ﺭﺑﻤﺎ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ
"ﺷﺒﻪ ﻟﻬﻢ" ﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﺼﻠﺒﻬﻢ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻗﺪ ﻅﻨﻮﺍ ﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﻗﻀﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ،
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻴﻬﺎﺕ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻀﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﺷﺒﻪ ﻟﻬﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ(( .
ﺍﻟﻤﻠﺤﻮﻅﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ :ﻻﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﻳﻔﺴﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ "ﻧﻜﺢ" ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻴﺤﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ
ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺰﻭﺝ ..ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻔﺘﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ
ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺗﻪ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﻗﺒﻴﺤﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ –ﻗﺪﺍﺳﺘﻪ -ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻄﻘﻬﺎ...ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻮ
ﻳﻔﻀﺢ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺟﻴﺪﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺝ !
ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﺸﺒﻬﺔ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻟﻦ ﺃﻧﻄﻖ ﺑﺤﺮﻑ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺳﺄﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎء ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ
ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ} َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﻗَﺘَﻠُﻮﻩُ َﻭ َﻣﺎ َ
ﺻﻠَﺒُﻮﻩُ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ُﺷﺒّﻪَ ﻟَﻬُ ْﻢ { ﻟﺘﺮﻯ
ﺣﺮﻓﻴﺔ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻭﺗﺤﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
)) ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﻥ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﻳﻠﻘﻲ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻳﻔﺘﺢ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺴﻄﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺯﻳﺪﺍً ﻓﻠﻌﻠﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺰﻳﺪ ،
ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻟﻘﻰ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺯﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻼﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ،
ﻭﺛﻮﻗﺎ ً ﺑﻪ ....ﻭﺍﻟﺠﻮﺍﺏ :ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﺖ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎء ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺿﻊ ﻭﺫﻛﺮﻭﺍ
ﻭﺟﻮﻫﺎ ً :
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﻛﺜﻴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻜﻠﻤﻴﻦ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻟﻤﺎ ﻗﺼﺪﻭﺍ ﻗﺘﻠﻪ ﺭﻓﻌﻪ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ
ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﻓﺨﺎﻑ ﺭﺅﺳﺎء ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻬﻢ ،ﻓﺄﺧﺬﻭﺍ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﺎ ً
ﻭﻗﺘﻠﻮﻩ ﻭﺻﻠﺒﻮﻩ ﻭﻟﺒﺴﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺇﻻّ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﻢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻭﺑﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺯﺍﻝ
ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ .ﻻ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻳﻨﻘﻠﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺳﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻭﻩ ﻣﻘﺘﻮﻻً ،
ﻷﻧﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﻴﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ .
ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﺃﻟﻘﻰ ﺷﺒﻬﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺛﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ :ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
:ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻟﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﻧﻲ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻳﻬﻮﺫﺍ
ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﺭﺟﻼً ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻁﻴﻄﺎﻳﻮﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻭﻳﺨﺮﺟﻪ ﻟﻴﻘﺘﻠﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺩﺧﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﺧﺮﺝ ﷲ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ
ﻣﻦ ﺳﻘﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻭﺃﻟﻘﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺷﺒﻪ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻓﻈﻨﻮﻩ ﻫﻮ ﻓﺼﻠﺒﻮﻩ
ﻭﻗﺘﻠﻮﻩ .ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ :ﻭﻛﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﻌﻴﺴﻰ ﺭﺟﻼً ﻳﺤﺮﺳﻪ ﻭﺻﻌﺪ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﺠﺒﻞ ﻭﺭﻓﻊ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ،ﻭﺃﻟﻘﻰ ﷲ ﺷﺒﻬﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﺐ ﻓﻘﺘﻠﻮﻩ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
ﻟﺴﺖ ﺑﻌﻴﺴﻰ .ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻟﻤﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍ ﺑﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻬﻢ :ﻣﻦ ﻳﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻠﻘﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺷﺒﻬﻲ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ
ﺃﻧﺎ ،ﻓﺄﻟﻘﻰ ﷲ ﺷﺒﻪ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺄﺧﺮﺝ ﻭﻗﺘﻞ ،ﻭﺭﻓﻊ ﷲ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ
.ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻳﺪﻋﻲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ
ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻘﺎ ً ﻓﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﺩﻟﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺩﺧﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻷﺧﺬﻩ ﺃﻟﻘﻰ ﷲ
ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﺷﺒﻬﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻘﺘﻞ ﻭﺻﻠﺐ (( .
ہﻠﻟ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻟﻮ ﻗﻠﺖ ﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺲ ﻣﻨﻴﺲ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ
ﺷﺒﻬﺎﺕ ﻭﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ))ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺳﻨﺪ ﻣﺘﱠﺼﻞ ﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ
ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ((
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻌﻼ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻚ ﺗﻜﺘﺸﻒ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺲ ﻣﻨﻴﺲ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
))ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺘﺮﺽ» :ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺳﻨﺪ ﻣﺘﱠﺼﻞ ﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ...ﺇﻟﺦ((
ﻓﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻜﻤﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻛﻬﺬﺍ؟
ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺇﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ "ﺣﺘﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺪﺍء" ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﻛﺎﺫﻳﺒﻪ ﻟﻦ ﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻭﺻﺪﻗﻮﻧﻲ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ
ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺩﻣﺮ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﺃﺛﺒﺖ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ ﻭﺍﻹﻓﺘﺮﺍء ﺑﻞ ﻭﻣﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﺩ ﺃﺧﻄﺎء ﻋﻔﻮﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺸﻴﺮﻳﺔ
ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺫﺑﺔ...ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺗﺪﻟﻴﺴﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺛﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻵﻻﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺒﺘﻮﺭﺓ
ﻭﺍﻹﺳﺘﺸﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺒﺘﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﻗﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻳﻨﺘﻔﻲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻗﻴﺔ !
ﺛﻢ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﻣﻴﺎ ﻛﻌﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻨﻘﻠﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻌﻬﻢ ﺛﻢ ﻧﺒﻴﻦ ﻟﻬﻢ
ﻛﺬﺑﻬﺎ ﻟﻌﺬﺭﻧﺎﻩ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻹﺳﺘﺸﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻫﻮ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻬﺎ ﻓﻤﺎ
ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ؟
ﻭ ﻟﻠﺮﺩ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺼﻮﻝ ﻣﺤﻮ ﺍﻷﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﺠﺎﻧﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻟﺘﺘﻌﻠﻢ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍءﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ّ
"ﺇﻥ" ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻥ)ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ
ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺗﻪ(...ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ " ﺇِﻥْ " ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻥ !
ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻀﺤﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺄﺗﻲ ﺑﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺬﻭﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﻓﻴﻀﻌﻪ ﻓﻲ
ﻛﻞ ﺷﺒﻬﺔ ﻓﻴﻌﻴﺪﻩ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺷﺒﻬﺔ " ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻘﻴﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺆﺗﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ"
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺴﺮﻭﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻄﺮﻕ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻘﻨﻌﺔ ﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻠﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﺎﺋﻖ،
ﻓﻤﺜﻼ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻔﻲ :ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺃﻧﻪ "ﻻ ﻳﺼﻴﺐ ﻋﻬﺪﻱ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﺃﻫ َﻞ
ﺍﻟﻈﻠﻢ" ﻓﺠﻌﻞ "ﻋﻬﺪﻱ" ﻓﺎﻋﻞ ،ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻟﻤﻴﻦ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﻌﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺼﻮﺏ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﺎء
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻥ .ﻭﻧﺴﻲ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻌﻞ "ﻳﻨﺎﻝ" )ﻛﻤﺎ ﺟﺎء ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻴﻂ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻲء ،ﺇﺫ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ]ﻧﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻲء ﺃﻱ ﺣﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺟﺰ 2ﺹ [964ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺸﻲء ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ!!!! ﻓﻤﺜﻼ ﻻ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻧﻘﻮﻝ" :ﻧﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﺋﺰﺓُ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻬﺪﻳﻦ"! ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ" :ﻧﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻬﺪﻭﻥ
ﺍﻟﺠﺎﺋﺰﺓ" ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ )ﻭﻫﻮ ﺷﻲء( ﻳﻨﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻟﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻏﻴﺮ
ﻣﻘﻨﻊ ،ﻭﻧﺤﻦ ﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﺭﺩﺍً ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺎ ً ﻣﻘﻨﻌﺎ ً(( .
ﻳﺎ ﻟﻐﺒﺎﺋﻚ !
ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺇﺫ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﻟﻚ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻧﻠﺘﻪ ..ﻓﺄﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﺔ ؟!!
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻐﺒﺎءﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺃﻱ "ﻟﻴﺘﻜﻢ ﺗﺤﺘﻤﻠﻮﻥ ﻏﺒﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﻗﻠﻴﻼ" )) +ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺎء
ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻴﻂ ﻟﻤﺠﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ] :ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺑﺌﻮﻥ :ﻗﻮﻡ ﻳﻌﺒﺪﻭﻥ
ﺍﻟﻜﻮﺍﻛﺐ ﻭﻳﺰﻋﻤﻮﻥ ﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻠﺔ ﻧﻮﺡ ،ﻭﻗﺒﻠﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻬﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺎﻝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﻒ
ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ[ )ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻴﻂ ﺍﻟﺠﺰء ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺹ (505ﻋﺠﺒﺎ ﺇﺫ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ
ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ :ﻻ ﺧﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ﻫﻢ ﻳﺤﺰﻧﻮﻥ!!!((
ﺃﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺎﺑﺌﻮﻥ ﻻ ﺧﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ؟
ﺳﺄﻧﻘﻞ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺔ ﺹ4
))ﺏ -ﻓﻰ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺋﺪﺓ" 69 : 5ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﻨﻮﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻫﺎﺩﻭﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺎﺑﺌﻮﻥ
ﺧﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ُ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻋﻤﻞ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﺎ ﻓﻼ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺁﻣﻦ ﺑﺎہﻠﻟ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ِ
ﻫﻢ ﻳﺤﺰﻧﻮﻥ" ((
" ﺁﻣﻦ ﺑﺎہﻠﻟ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻋﻤﻞ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﺎ"
ﻫﺬﻩ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻓﺤﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻠﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺒﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ؟!
ﺑِﺎہﻠﻟِ َﻭﺍ ْﻟﻴَ ْﻮ ِﻡ
ّ ﻦْ ﺁﻣَﻦ
َ ﺼﺎ َﺭﻯ ﻭﻥ َﻭﺍﻟﻨﱠ َ ﻭﺍ َﻭﺍﻟﺼﱠﺎﺑِ ُﺆ َ ﻳﻦ ﻫَﺎ ُﺩ ْ ﻳﻦ ﺁ َﻣﻨُ ْ
ﻮﺍ َﻭﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ ﺇِ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ
ﻮﻥ )ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺋﺪﺓ ( 69 : ﻑ َﻋﻠَ ْﻴ ِﻬ ْﻢ َﻭﻻَ ﻫُ ْﻢ ﻳَﺤْ َﺰﻧُ َ
ﺻﺎﻟِﺤﺎ ً ﻓَﻼَ َﺧ ْﻮ ٌ ﺍﻵﺧ ِﺮ ﻭ َﻋ ِﻤ َﻞ َ
ِ
ﻓﻔﺮﻕ ﻛﺒﻴﺮ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻗﻮﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺎﺑﺌﻮﻥ ﻻ ﺧﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﺑﻴﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ...ﻻ ﺧﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ !!!...
ﻭﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻁﺎﻟﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻧﺼﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻓﻼ ﺧﻮﻑ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺤﺰﻧﻮﻥ !!..
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺳﺎﺭﺩﺍ ﺷﺒﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺗﻐﺮﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﻤﺌﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ
ﺃﺩﺭﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﻓﻬﻤﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺊ ﻋﺪﻳﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ: 8
))"ﻭﻳﺴﺄﻟﻮﻧﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻧﻴﻦ ﻗﻞ ﺳﺄﺗﻠﻮ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺫﻛﺮﺍً ﺇﻧﺎ ﻣﻜﻨﱠﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻭﺁﺗﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ
ﺷﻲء ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﻓﺄ َ ْﺗﺒَ َﻊ َﺳﺒَﺒﺎ ً ﺣﺘﻰ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻎ ﻣﻐﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﺟﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﻐﺮُﺏُ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻴﻦ َﺣ ِﻤﺌَ ٍﺔ ﻭﻭﺟﺪ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ
ﻗﻮﻣﺎ ً"((
ﺃﻭﻻ ﻻﺣﻈﺘﻢ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﺤﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺨﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻳﺾ
ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻁ ﺇﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺗﻐﺮﺏ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﻤﺌﺔ..ﻭﺗﺮﻙ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎء ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺼﻒ...ﻭﻟﻢ ﻟﻢ ﺗﻼﺣﻆ ﻫﺬﺍ :
ﻫﺎ ﺗَ ْﻐﺮُﺏُ ﻓِﻲ َﻋﻴ ٍْﻦ َﺣ ِﻤﺌَ ٍﺔ َﻭ َﻭ َﺟ َﺪ ِﻋ ْﻨ َﺪﻫَﺎ
ﺲ َﻭ َﺟ َﺪ َﺏ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺸ ْﻤ ِ
) َﺣﺘﱠﻰ ﺇِ َﺫﺍ ﺑَﻠَ َﻎ َﻣ ْﻐ ِﺮ َ
ﻗَ ْﻮ ًﻣ ﺎ (
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺠﺰء ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻘﻠﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺷﺒﻬﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﺟﻬﺎ –ﻣﻦ
ﺗﺤﺖ ﻟﺘﺤﺖ -ﻭﺳﺄﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ
ﻓﻠﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺗﻐﺮﺏ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﻤﺌﺔ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻧﻴﻦ
ﺭﺃﻯ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺗﻐﺮﺏ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﻤﺌﺔ !
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻢ ﻛﻞ ﺷﺒﻬﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻟﻠﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻧﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻧﻮﺿﺢ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺧﻔﺎﻩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻟﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺪﻟﻴﺴﺎ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ !
ﻭﻟﻠﺘﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻭﺏ ﻣﺘﺠﻬﺎ ً ﻏﺮﺑﺎ ً ﻭﺃﻣﺎﻣﻚ ﺟﺒﻞ ﻓﺈﻧﻚ ﺳﻮﻑ
ﺗﺠﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺗﻐﺮﺏ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺠﺒﻞ .. ..ﻁﺒﻌﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ
ﺗﺨﺘﺒﺊ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺠﺒﻞ .......ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻚ ﺑﺤﻴﺮﺓ ﻓﺴﺘﺠﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ
ﺗﻐﺮﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻴﺮﺓ ..ﻭﺫﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻧﻴﻦ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﻤﺌﺔ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ
ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻓﻮﺟﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﻐﺮﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻦ ......ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﺟﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﻐﺮﺏ ﺧﻠﻒ
ﺍﻟﺠﺒﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻭﺟﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﻐﺮﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻦ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻪ ...ﻭﺍﻷﻳﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺔ
ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﻞ ﻣﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺑﺸﺨﺺ ﺫﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻧﻴﻦ ....ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﻟﻶﻳﺔ ﻣﺮﺓ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ
ﺲ َﻭ َﺟ َﺪﻫَﺎ ﺗَ ْﻐﺮُﺏُ ﻓِﻲ َﻋﻴ ٍْﻦ َﺣ ِﻤﺌَ ٍﺔ(( ﺏ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺸ ْﻤ ِ )) َﺣﺘﱠﻰ ﺇِ َﺫﺍ ﺑَﻠَ َﻎ َﻣ ْﻐ ِﺮ َ
ﻟﻨﺒﺴﻂ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﺒﺴﻴﻂ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ .......ﺫﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻧﻴﻦ ﻭﺟﺪ )ﺭﺃﻱ( ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺗﻐﺮﺏ ﻓﻰ
ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﻤﺌﺔ ﻭﷲ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻐﺮﺏ ﻓﻰ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﻤﺌﺔ..
ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﺔ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻁﺒﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ
ﻚ ﻻَ ﺗَﺘَﻨَﺒﱠﻪُ ﺇِﻟَﻰ ْﺍﻟ َﺨ َﺸﺒَ ِﺔ ْﺍﻟ َﻜﺒِﻴ َﺮ ِﺓ ﻓِﻲ ﻚَ ،ﻭﻟ ِﻜﻨﱠ َ" َﻭﻟِ َﻤﺎ َﺫﺍ ﺗُﻼَ ِﺣﻆُ ْﺍﻟﻘَ ﱠﺸﺔَ ﻓِﻲ َﻋﻴ ِْﻦ ﺃَ ِﺧﻴ َ
ﺝ ْﺍﻟﻘَ ﱠﺸﺔَ ﺍﻟﱠﺘِﻲ ﻓِﻲ ُ
ﻚ :ﻳَﺎﺃَ ِﺧﻲَ ،ﺩ ْﻋﻨِﻲ ﺃ ْﺧ ِﺮ ِ ْﻒ ﺗَ ْﻘ ِﺪ ُﺭ ﺃَ ْﻥ ﺗَﻘُﻮ َﻝ ﻷَ ِﺧﻴ َ ﻚ؟ ﺃَ ْﻭ َﻛﻴ َ َﻋ ْﻴﻨِ َ
ﺖ .ﻳَﺎ ُﻣ َﺮﺍﺋِﻲ ،ﺃَ ْﺧ ِﺮ ْﺝ ﺃَ ﱠﻭﻻً ﻚ ﺃَ ْﻧ َ
ﻼﺣﻆُ ْﺍﻟ َﺨ َﺸﺒَﺔَ ﺍﻟﱠﺘِﻲ ﻓﻲ َﻋ ْﻴﻨِ َ ﺖ ﻻَ ﺗ ُ ِ ﻚ! ﻭﺃَ ْﻧ َ َﻋ ْﻴﻨِ َ
ﻚ.ْﺼ ُﺮ َﺟﻴﱢﺪﺍً ﻟِﺘُ ْﺨ ِﺮ َﺝ ْﺍﻟﻘَ ﱠﺸﺔَ ﺍﻟﱠﺘِﻲ ﻓِﻲ َﻋﻴ ِْﻦ ﺃَ ِﺧﻴ َ ﺸﺒَﺔَ ِﻣﻦْ َﻋ ْﻴﻨِ َﻚَ ،ﻭ ِﻋ ْﻨ َﺪﺋِ ٍﺬ ﺗُﺒ ِ ﺍ ْﻟ َﺨ َ
ﻟُﻮﻗَ ﺎ 42 - 41 : 6
)) ﻭﻅﻬﺮﺕ ﺁﻳﺔ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﺍﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﻣﺘﺴﺮﺑﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﺗﺤﺖ
ﺭﺟﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺍﺳﻬﺎ ﺍﻛﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺛﻨﻲ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻛﻮﻛﺒﺎ !!!!
ﺭﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺎﺑﻮﺱ ﻳﻮﺣﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺰﻋﺞ ﻭﺭﺃﻯ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﻨﺎﻧﻴﻦ ﻭﻫﻲ
ﺃﺷﻴﺎء ﺃﺳﻄﻮﺭﻳﺔ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻘﺲ ﺣﻠﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ!...ﺣﺴﻨﺎ ﺩﻋﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ "ﻣﻨﺎﻡ ﻳﻮﺣﻨﺎ"
ﻓﻠﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ:
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﺷﻌﻴﺎء
ﺕ ﺁ َﺣﺎ َﺯ ﺑِﺎﻟ ﱠﺸ ْﻤ ِ
ﺲ َﻋ َﺸ َﺮ )8ﻫَﺌَﻨَ َﺬﺍ ﺃُ َﺭﺟﱢ ُﻊ ِﻅ ﱠﻼ ﻟ ﱠﺪ َﺭ َﺟﺎ ِ
ﺕ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬﻱ ﻧَ َﺰ َﻝ ﻓِﻲ َﺩ َﺭ َﺟﺎ ِ
ﺕ ﺍﻟﱠﺘِﻲﺕ ﻓِﻲ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪ َﺭ َﺟﺎ ِﺸ َﺮ َﺩ َﺭ َﺟﺎ ٍ
ﺲ َﻋ َﺸ ْﻤ ُﺖ ﺍﻟ ﱠ ﺕ ﺇِﻟَ ْ
ٮﺎﻟ َﻮ َﺭﺍ ِء«. .ﻓَ َﺮ َﺟ َﻌ ِ َﺩ َﺭ َﺟﺎ ٍ
ﻧَ َﺰﻟَ ْﺘ َﻬﺎ( .ﺃﺷﻌﻴﺎء 8/38
ﻟﻨﻨﻈﺮ
14ﻓﻌﺒﺮﻭﺍ ﻭﺫﻫﺒﻮﺍ ﻭﻏﺎﺑﺖ ﻟﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺟﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻟﺒﻨﻴﺎﻣﻴﻦ .ﻗﻀﺎﺓ 19
14 /
ﻫﻞ ﻧﺘﻐﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺗﻌﻠﻮ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﺛﻢ ﺗﻨﺰﻝ ﻟﺘﻐﻴﺐ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺟﺒﻌﺔ ؟ ﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﻷﻧﻬﺎ
ﺗﻐﻴﺐ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺟﺒﻌﺔ ؟ ﺃﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻏﺎﺑﺖ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﻭﺻﻮﻟﻬﻢ ﻟﻤﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺟﺒﻌﺔ ؟
ﻫﻞ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻭﻻ ﻫﻢ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﺍﻻ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺤﻔﻈﻪ ﻟﻬﻢ
ﺍﻟﻤﺒﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﻏﺒﻴﺎء ؟
ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻟﺘﺤﺖ ﻳﺤﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺑﻂ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺇﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭ -ﺣﺴﺐ
ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﻴﺮ -ﻣﻊ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ "ﻗﻮﻡ ﻳﻌﺒﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﺛﺎﻥ"ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ! ﻣﻊ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ
ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﺒﺘﻮﺭﺓ " ))"ﻭﻳﺴﺄﻟﻮﻧﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻧﻴﻦ ﻗﻞ ﺳﺄﺗﻠﻮ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺫﻛﺮﺍً ﺇﻧﺎ ﻣﻜﻨﱠﺎ ﻟﻪ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻭﺁﺗﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲء ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﻓﺄ َ ْﺗﺒَ َﻊ َﺳﺒَﺒﺎ ً ﺣﺘﻰ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻎ ﻣﻐﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﺟﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﻐﺮُﺏُ ﻓﻲ
ﻋﻴﻦ َﺣ ِﻤﺌَ ٍﺔ ﻭﻭﺟﺪ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﻗﻮﻣﺎ ً"((
ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻟﺘﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺫﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻧﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻌﺒﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻨﺎﻡ
ﻓﻘﻂ ﻟﻴﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺩﻳﻨﻨﺎ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﷲ ﻻ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ
ﻋﻦ ﺇﻧﺘﻘﺎﺹ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺍﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻷﺭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺊ....ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ
ﺲ َﻭ َﺟ َﺪﻫَﺎ ﺗَ ْﻐﺮُﺏُ ﻓِﻲ َﻋﻴ ٍْﻦ َﺣ ِﻤﺌَ ٍﺔ َﻭ َﻭ َﺟ َﺪ ِﻋﻨ َﺪﻫَﺎ ﺏ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺸ ْﻤ ِ ) َﺣﺘﱠﻰ ﺇِ َﺫﺍ ﺑَﻠَ َﻎ َﻣ ْﻐ ِﺮ َ
ﺴﻨﺎ ً} {86ﻗَﺎ َﻝ ﺃَ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺏ َﻭﺇِ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺃَﻥ ﺗَﺘﱠ ِﺨ َﺬ ﻓِﻴ ِﻬ ْﻢ ُﺣ ْﻗَ ْﻮﻣﺎ ً ﻗُ ْﻠﻨَﺎ ﻳَﺎ َﺫﺍ ﺍ ْﻟﻘَ ْﺮﻧَ ْﻴ ِﻦ ﺇِ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺃَﻥ ﺗُ َﻌ ﱢﺬ َ
ﻑ ﻧُ َﻌ ﱢﺬﺑُﻪُ ﺛُ ﱠﻢ ﻳُ َﺮ ﱡﺩ ﺇِﻟَﻰ َﺭﺑﱢ ِﻪ ﻓَﻴُ َﻌ ﱢﺬﺑُﻪُ َﻋ َﺬﺍﺑﺎ ً ﻧﱡ ْﻜﺮﺍً} َ {87ﻭﺃَ ﱠﻣ ﺎ َﻣﻦْ َﻣﻦ ﻅَﻠَ َﻢ ﻓَ َ
ﺴ ْﻮ َ
ﺳﻨَﻘُﻮ ُﻝ ﻟَﻪُ ِﻣﻦْ ﺃَ ْﻣ ِﺮﻧَﺎ
ﺴﻨَﻰ َﻭ َ ﺻﺎﻟِﺤﺎ ً ﻓَﻠَﻪُ َﺟ َﺰﺍء ﺍ ْﻟ ُﺤ ْ ﺁ َﻣ َﻦ َﻭ َﻋ ِﻤ َﻞ َ
ﺴﺮﺍً} {88ﺍﻟﻜﻬﻒ( ﻳُ ْ
ﻭﻳﻜﻤﻞ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ ))ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﻭﻱ] :ﺇﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺳﻤﻊ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ
"ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺔ" ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﺣﻤﺌﺔ" ﻓﺒﻌﺚ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻛﻌﺐ ﺍﻷﺣﺒﺎﺭ :ﻛﻴﻒ ﺗﺠﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ
ﺗﻐﺮﺏ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﻲ ﻣﺎء ﻭﻁﻴﻦ[ )ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﺰء
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺹ 40ﻭ (( (41
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻮﻱ ﻳﺘﺨﺜﺮ ﻓﻴﺼﻴﺮ ﺟﺒﻨﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺠﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ !!
ﺩﻱ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻗﺸﻄﺔ ﺧﺎﻟﺺ!!
ﻧﺮﺟﻮ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻓﻲ ﻛﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻄﺐ ﻭﺷﻜﺮﺍ !
ﺃﺣﻠﻰ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﺳﻤﻌﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺤﺎﺿﺮﺓ
ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻋﺒﺪ ﷲ ﺑﺪﺭ ..ﻗﺎﻝ "ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ..ﺟﺒﻨﻪ ﻭﺳﺮﺱ " !!
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺇﻗﺘﺒﺴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﺪﺭﻳﻦ ﺃﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻭﻗﺪ
ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎء ﺑﻪ ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻄﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ..ﻭﷲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺟﻴﺪ ﻟﻘﺪ ﺟﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﻠﻰ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻁﺒﻴﺒﺎ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻄﺐ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ !!
))ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ً :ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻄﺐ:
)ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻴﺴﺮﺓ ﺹ 1149ﻭ ] (1150ﺗﺸﻴﺮ ﺍﻵﺛﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺸﻮء ﻣﻬﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺐ ﻟﺪﻯ
ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻣﺮﻳﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﺑﻠﻴﻴﻦ )ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﻴﻼﺩ ﺑﺒﻀﻌﺔ ﻗﺮﻭﻥ( .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺣﺮﺯﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺪﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻤﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻦ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻬﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻣﺼﺮ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺩﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺤﻴﺔ ...ﻛﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ
ﺑﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻴﻮﻡ ﺗﺤﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺤﻲ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺟﺰء ﺧﺎﺹ ﺑﺄﻣﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎء
ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻤﻞ ...ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻬﺎ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﺳﻨﺔ 1800ﻕ.ﻡ )ﺃﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻦ 2400ﺳﻨﺔ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ( ...ﻭﺗﺤﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺻﻒ ﻷﺟﺰﺍء ﺍﻟﺠﺴﻢ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺳﺎﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻠﺤﻮﻅ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﺍﻟﻄﺐ ...ﻓﺘﺮﺟﻤﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻮﻧﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻤﺔ ...ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺐ[
ﺃﻻ ﺗﺮﻯ ﻣﻌﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺄﺕ ﺑﺠﺪﻳﺪ ،ﺑﻞ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ
ﻋﻦ 2600ﺳﻨﺔ ؟؟!!(( .
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻓﻲ ﻗﻨﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺎﺓ ﻗﺎﻝ
ﺣﺮﻓﻴﺎ –ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺴﺠﻴﻞ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ -ﺣﺮﻑ ﻧﺺ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﻀﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺣﺮﻓﻴﺎ ))ﻣﺰﻣﻮﺭ 139ﺑﻴﻘﻮﻝ ﻧﺴﺠﺘﻨﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺑﻄﻦ ﺃﻣﻲ ﺃﺣﻤﺪﻙ ﻷﻧﻚ
ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺈﻋﺠﺎﺯﻙ ﺍﻟﻤﺪﻫﺶ ﻟﻢ ﺗﺨﺘﻔﻲ ﻋﻨﻚ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ
ﺍﺑﺪﻋﺘﻨﻲ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺨﻔﺎء ﺭﺃﺗﻨﻲ ﻋﻴﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﻠﻘﺔ ﻭﺟﻨﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺨﻠﻖ
ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺋﻲ ﻛﺘﺒﺖ ﻓﻲ ﺳﻔﺮﻙ ((
ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻘﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺇﻁﻼﻗﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻱ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﻋﺮﺑﻴﺔ ...ﻭﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ
ﺃﻋﺠﺐ ﺑﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻨﻀﻌﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯ
ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ..ﺛﻢ ﻳﺄﺗﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺃﺧﻄﺎء ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ
ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯﺍ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺎ ..ﺃﻻ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻲ ؟!
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻛﻌﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻋﺒﻘﺮﻳﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺮﻁﺔ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ؟ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ
ﺯﻏﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﻭﺳﺄﺗﺮﻙ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺯﻏﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ:
))ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺑﻌﺪﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺯﻣﻴﻞ
ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺩﻳﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻭﻋﻀﻮ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺗﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﻌﻬﺪ ﻣﺎﺭﻙ ﻓﻴﻠﺪ
ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ((.
ﻳﺄﺗﻲ ﺧﺮﻳﺞ ﺍﻵﺩﺍﺏ )ﻣﻊ ﺇﺣﺘﺮﺍﻣﻨﺎ ﻟﺨﺮﻳﺠﻲ ﺍﻵﺩﺍﺏ( ﻟﻴﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ
ﺯﻏﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺫﻭ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻲ !
ﻭﻻ ﺍﺻﺒﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺅﺟﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻟﻠﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺼﻞ ﻓﻮﻗﺘﻪ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻟﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻀﺤﻚ..ﺃﻭﻻ ﻳﺠﻠﺐ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺇﺳﺘﺸﻬﺪ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺯﻏﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ
ﻭﻫﻲ
ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ .ﻭﺇﻧﻪ ﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﻟﻮ ﺗﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ" )ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ 75ﻭ (76 ِ ﺑﻤﻮﺍﻗﻊ
ِ )) 1ـ "ﻓﻼ ﺃُ ْﻗ ِﺴ ُﻢ
2ـ "ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﺑﻨﻴﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﺄﻳ ٍﺪ ﻭﺇﻧﱠﺎ ﻟﻤﻮﺳﻌﻮﻥ" )ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺭﻳﺎﺕ (47
ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻛﺎﻧﺘﺎ َﺭ ْﺗﻘﺎ ﻓﻔﺘﻘﻨﺎﻫﻤﺎ " )ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء (30 َ ﺕ
3ـ "ﺃﻭ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﻔﺮﻭﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻮﺍ ِ
ﺩﺧﺎﻥ ) "...ﻓﺼﻠﺖ(1 4ـ "ﺛﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﻯ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﻭﻫﻲ َ
ﻖ ﻧُ ِﻌﻴ ُﺪﻩُ َﻭ ْﻋﺪﺍً ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺇﻧﺎ ﻛﻨﺎ ﻓﺎ ِﻋﻠﻴﻦ"
5ـ "ﻳﻮﻡ ﻧﻄ ِﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎ َء َﻛﻄَ ﱢﻲ ﺍﻟﺴ ِﱢﺠ ﱢﻞ ﻟﻠﻜﺘﺐ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﺪﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﻭ َﻝ ﺧﻠ ٍ
)ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء (104
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﻮﺍﺕ" )ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ (48ﻭﻳﻌﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ُ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ
ِ 6ـ "ﻳﻮ َﻡ ﺗُﺒَ ﱠﺪ ُﻝ ﺍﻷﺭﺽُ ﻏﻴ َﺮ
ﻗﺎﺋﻼ] :ﻗﺼﺔ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﻳﺠﻤﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﺪﻗﺔ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺳﺖ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﺗﻠﺨﺺ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ،
ﻟﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻊ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺇﻓﻨﺎﺋﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻓﻲ ﺇﺟﻤﺎﻝ ﻭﺩﻗﺔ ﻭﺇﺣﺎﻁﺔ ﻣﻌﺠﺰﺓ ﻟﻠﻐﺎﻳﺔ،
ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺷﻲء ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺃﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻳﻦ [ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ )ﻣﻦ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﺹ (45
((
ﻻﺣﻆ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺑﺎﻟﺨﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻳﺾ )ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﺑﻨﻴﻨﺎﻫﺎ( ﻭﻛﺄﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﻹﻋﺠﺎﺯ ؟! ..ﺍﻹﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﻫﻮ )ﻭﺇﻧﺎ ﻟﻤﻮﺳﻌﻮﻥ( ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻳﺘﺠﺎﻫﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ !
)) ﻗﺼﺔ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺩﺗﻪ :ﻟﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻊ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻞ
ﺇﻟﻰ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺷﻲء ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺃﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻳﻦ[ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ] :ﻗﺼﺔ
ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﻳﺠﻤﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﺪﻗﺔ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺳﺖ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﺗﻠﺨﺺ ﺧﻠﻖ
ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ [...
ﻫﻞ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﻳﺎ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻱ ،ﺩﻗﺔ ﻭﺳﻼﺳﺔ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ .ﺃﺭﺟﻮﻙ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﺮﺃ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ،ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺭﺍﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺠﻴﻞ ﻟﺘﺴﺘﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ( ((
ﺩﻋﻨﺎ ﻧﺆﻛﺪ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ
ﺟﺎء ﻓﻲ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﻒ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺎ ﻟﻢ ﺃﺟﺪ ﺻﻔﺤﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺮ ﺗﺨﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺛﺔ !!
ﺃﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﺎﻗﻞ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻋﻦ ﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ " ..ﻭﺭﺃﻯ ﷲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻧﻪ ﺣﺴﻦ".
ﻭﻛﺄﻧﻨﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﻮﻧﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺛﻼﺛﻲ ﺍﻷﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻓﻴﻌﺠﺒﻨﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺻﻤﻤﻪ ﺃﻭ
ﻻ ؟! ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺭﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻴﻖ ﺑﺎﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺐ؟!
ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﺟﻠﺪ ؟! ﻳﺎ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ !!
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﻳﺨﻠﻖ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ ﻭﻓﻘﻂ ...ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﺤﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺒﺎﺡ
ﻟﻴﻜﻤﻞ ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺮﻱ "ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﻴﻦ" ؟!!
ﺃﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻗﺎﺕ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺇﺳﻤﻬﺎ "ﺗﻨﻴﻦ" ﻳﻨﻔﺚ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ؟ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻜﻢ ﺇﻧﻪ
ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺇﺳﻄﻮﺭﻱ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻗﻂ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻅﻬﺮ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻓﺄﻱ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺞ
ﺑﺎﻟﺠﻬﻞ ﻭﺳﺐ ﷲ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺎﻁﻴﺮ ﻭ"ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻧﻴﻦ" ﺗﻨﺴﺒﻮﻩ ہﻠﻟ ؟!!
ﺃﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻟﻪ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ ؟! ..ﻓﺮﺃﻯ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺟﺪﺍ !!...ﺇﺳﺘﺮﺍﺡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ؟! ﺃﻱ ﺇﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ؟
ﺛﻢ ﺃﻱ ﻋﻘﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺊ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ؟! ﻭﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﻳﺪﻋﻲ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺠﺰ !!!
ﺛﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺗﻘﺘﺮﺏ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺮ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻢ ﺑﻬﺎ
ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ ..ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ )ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺘﻬﺎ ﺻﻔﺮ( ﻭﺣﺪﺙ
ﺍﻹﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭ ﻭﻣﺎﺯﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﻳﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻟﻮ ﻧﻘﺼﺖ ﺃﻭ ﺯﺍﺩﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻟﻀﺎﻉ ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ !!
ﻭﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ ﺳﺄﺑﻴﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺒﻴﺔ –ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻬﺎ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ -ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺼﻞ!
ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﺪ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻳﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻣﻊ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﻦ ...
ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺤﻴﻴﻦ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻫﺮﺍء ﻭﺳﺘﺠﺪ ﻓﻲ "ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺑﻴﺖ ﷲ
ﺍﻟﺤﻲ" ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺒﺎ ﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺮ ﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ!!
ﺑﻞ ﻭﻳﺆﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻹﺳﺘﺸﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﺍﺋﺪ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ
ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻭﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺗﺆﻳﺪﻫﺎ!!
ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﺎ ﺇﻋﺘﺮﺍﻓﻬﻢ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺘﻔﻖ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ..ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﻗﻊ ))ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ:
ﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻎ ﺑﺎﻧﻎ ﻭﻳﻌﺒﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺎ ً
ﻭﺭﻭﺣﻴﺎ ً ﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻜﺮ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺧﻠﻖ ﷲ ﺍﻟﻤﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﻟﻠﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﻲ
ﺧﻠﻴﻘﺘﻪ ،ﻗﺪ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻭﻳﻈﻨﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ "ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻒ" ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺎ ً ﻭﻻ
ﻳﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻗﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ :ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﻜﻦ ﺍﻹﻟﻪ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎ ً ﻭﻛ ّﻞ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺫﺏ((.
ﺳﺘﺠﺪﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺑﻴﺖ ﷲ ﺗﺤﺖ
\var\Big-Bang-errors-Halton-Arp.htm
ﻭ ﻛﻌﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻳﻨﻬﻲ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﻐﻴﻆ ! ﻓﺒﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎء ﺑﺴﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﻦ
ﻣﻦ ﺗﻨﺎﻧﻴﻦ ﻭﺧﻼﻓﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ:
)) ﻫﻞ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﻳﺎ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻱ ،ﺩﻗﺔ ﻭﺳﻼﺳﺔ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ .ﺃﺭﺟﻮﻙ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﺮﺃ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ،ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺭﺍﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺠﻴﻞ ﻟﺘﺴﺘﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻋﻴﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﻗﻮﻝ
ﺭﺳﻮﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ" :ﻗﻞ ﻓﺄﺗﻮﺍ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﷲ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻫﺪﻯ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﺗﺒﻌﻪ" )ﺳﻮﺭﺓ
ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺺ (( 49 :28
ﻁﺒﻌﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﻕ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﻋﻨﻘﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺠﺪ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺴﺮ ﺍﻵﻳﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺭﺍﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺠﻴﻞ ﻭﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻗﺎﻝ "ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ" ..ﻭﺟﺪﻳﺮ
ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻋﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺘﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ..ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﻻ
ﺗﺨﺪﻣﻪ :
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﻭﻱ ))} ﻗُﻞْ ﻓَﺄْﺗُ ْ
ﻮﺍ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺏ ّﻣ ْﻦ ِﻋﻨ ِﺪ ﷲ ﻫُ َﻮ ﺃﻫﺪﻯ ِﻣ ْﻨﻬُ َﻤﺎ { ﻣﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﺰﻝ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ((
+ﻓﻔﻲ )ﺃﻳﻮﺏ 7 :9ـ (9ﻳﻘﻮﻝ" :ﺍﻵﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ...ﻭ )ﺍﻟﺬﻱ( ﻳﺨﺘﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ .ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻮﺍﺕ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ...ﺻﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﺶ ﻭﺍﻟﺠﺒﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺮﻳﺎ ﻭﻣﺨﺎﺩﻉ
ﺍﻟﺠﻨﻮﺏ" )ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺳﻤﺎء ﻭﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ( ((
ﻟﻜﻲ ﺃﺩﻟﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻬﺮﺍء ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺧﻄﺄ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎء ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺑﻪ ..ﺃﻧﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺳﺄﻭﺭﺩ ﺇﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻟﻴﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻻ ﺗﺨﺪﻡ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻓﺤﺬﻓﻬﺎ؟!
ﻭﻣﺎﺯﺍﻝ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﺳﺒﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺑﺰﻣﻦ ...ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ !!
ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻹﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﻨﻲ ﻓﻜﺮﺕ ﻟﻮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺟﺎء ﺑﺄﻳﺪﻱ ﻋﻠﻤﺎء
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟﺲ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻭﺃﻭﺭﺑﺎ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻔﺔ...ﻟﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻫﺆﻻء ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﻳﺪﻟﺴﻮﻥ
ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﻳﻘﻠﺒﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﺎﺋﻖ ...ﺇﻟﺦ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﷲ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻷﻱ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﺣﺠﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻳﻈﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻏﻴﺮ
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﻭﻳﺒﺤﺜﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻓﻴﺠﺪﻭﺍ ﺇﻧﻄﺒﺎﻕ ﻣﺎ ﺇﻛﺘﺸﻔﻮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻳﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ :ﺃﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ "ﻛﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺭ" ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﻭﻓﻴﺴﻮﺭ .ﺟﻴﺮﺍﻟﺪ
ﺳﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺠﻴﻠﻮﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﻭﻓﻴﺴﻮﺭ ﺃﻟﻔﺮﻳﺪ ﻛﺮﻭﻧﺮ
ﻭﻟﻴﻌﺮﻓﻨﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺣﺘﻰ
ﺃﺿﺤﻚ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺎﻗﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺎﺕ!
ﻭﺳﺘﺠﺪ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻫﺆﻻء ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎء ﻓﻲ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺪﻳﻮ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ
http://www.islam-guide.com
ﻳﻦ ﺃُﻭﺗُﻮﺍ ْﺍﻟ ِﻌ ْﻠ َﻢ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﻳَﺠْ َﺤ ُﺪ ﺑِﺂﻳَﺎﺗِﻨَﺎ ﺇِ ﱠﻻ
ﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ
ﺻ ُﺪ ِ
ﺎﺕ ﻓِﻲ ُ ﺎﺕ ﺑَﻴﱢﻨَ ٌ
ﺑَﻞْ ﻫُ َﻮ ﺁﻳَ ٌ
ﻮﻥ )ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻜﺒﻮﺕ ( 49 : ﺍﻟﻈﱠﺎﻟِ ُﻤ َ
ﺃﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺑﻤﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ ﻓﻲ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ
ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ .ﻭﺇﻧﻪ ﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﻟﻮ ﺗﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ" )ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ
ِ ﺑﻤﻮﺍﻗﻊ
ِ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ "ﻓﻼ ﺃُ ْﻗ ِﺴ ُﻢ
75ﻭ (76ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺍ ﻓﻲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺩﻋﻮﺗﻪ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺠﺬﺏ ﺳﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﻳﺮﺓ
ﻟﺪﻋﻮﺗﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﺃﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺒﻮﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﻳﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ((
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﻻﺣﻆ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺟﺎء ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻨﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺷﺒﻬﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻻ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻟﻪ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻲ -ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ -ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻋﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ
ﻋﻠ َﻲ ﻓﻀﺤﻪ ...ﻓﺮﺣﺖ ﺃﺑﺤﺚ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺨﺔ ﺍﻹﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﻢ ﺃﺟﺪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ !!
ﺃﻩ....ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ))ﺃﺻﻨﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻭﻣﻴﻮﻟﻬﻢ :ﻓﻴﻌﺒﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻨﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻫﻲ
ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﺩﺍً ﻭﺳﻮﺍﻋﺎ ً ﻭﻳﻐﻮﺙ ﻭﻳﻌﻮﻕ ﻭﻧﺴﺮﺍً .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺩ ﻟﻜﻠﺐ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﺪﻭﻣﺔ
ﺍﻟﺠﻨﺪﻝ ،ﻭﺳﻮﺍﻉ ﻟﻬﺬﻱ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﺤﺠﻮﻥ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﻳﻨﺤﺮﻭﻥ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻳﻐﻮﺙ ﻟﺬﺣﺞ
ﻭﻟﻘﺒﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻦ ،ﻭﻳﻌﻮﻕ ﻟﻬﻤﺪﺍﻥ ،ﻭﻧﺴﺮ ﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻉ ﺑﺄﺭﺽ ﺣﻤﻴﺮ .ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﺍﻟﻼﺕ ﻟﺜﻘﻴﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺎﺋﻒ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺰﻱ ﻟﻘﺮﻳﺶ ﻭﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺑﻨﻲ ﻛﻨﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﻗﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻨﻲ
ﺳﻠﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻣﻨﺎﺓ ﻟﻸﻭﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﺰﺭﺝ ﻭﻏﺴﺎﻥ .ﻭﻫﺒﻞ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻷﺻﻨﺎﻡ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ؛ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻅﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺒﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺳﺎﻑ ﻭﻧﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺮﻭﺓ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ
ﻟﺤﻲ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺬﺑﺢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻧﺠﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﻌﺒﺔ ،ﻭﺯﻋﻤﻮﺍ :ﺃﻧﻬﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺮﻫﻢ :ﺃﺳﺎﻑ
ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ،ﻭﻧﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺳﻬﻞ ﺗﻌﺎﺳﻘﺎ ﻓﻔﺠﺮﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻌﺒﺔ ،ﻓﻤﺴﺨﺎ ﺣﺠﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻗﻴﻞ :ﻻ
ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﺻﻨﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎء ﺑﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺑﻦ ﻟﺤﻲ ﻓﻮﺿﻌﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎ((.
ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺔ ﺻﻐﻴﺮﺓ ﻷﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﺪﻟﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺏ :ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻋﺎﺑﺪﻱ ﺃﺻﻨﺎﻡ
ﻭﻋﺎﺑﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺋﻜﺔ ﻭﻋﺎﺑﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻟﺤﻴﻦ–ﻓﺎﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺃﻏﻠﺒﻬﻢ ﻭﺛﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺑﻘﺎﻳﺎ
ﻣﺠﻮﺱ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ...-ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﻋﺎﺑﺪﻱ ﻧﺠﻮﻡ ﻗﻂ !!
ﺛﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ..ﻳﺎ ﺃﺳﻮء ﺧﻠﻖ ﷲ ﻋﻘﻼ ...ﻫﻞ ﻋﻄﺎﺭﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﻭﺯﺣﻞ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ ؟ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻧﺠﻮﻣﺎ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﺍﻛﺐ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺮﻯ ؟!
ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ "ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﻟﻴﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺒﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﺍﻛﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ" ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ
ﻗﻮﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺒﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﺍﻛﺐ ..ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ ..ﻓﻤﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻮﻟﻲ؟!
ﺛﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﷲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻳﻘﺴﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﺘﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﻭﻟﻴﺎﻝ ﻋﺸﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻘﺴﻢ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺭﺏ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﺏ..ﻓﺈﻟﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ؟
ﺃﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻟﺪﻱ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻗﻮﻝ ﷲ:
)ﺇﻥ ﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﺏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﷲ ﺍﻟﺼﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻘﻠﻮﻥ !(
)) ﻭﻣﻤﺎ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ،ﺃﻧﻪ ﺟﺎء ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ )ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻢ
ﺍﻟﻼﺕ ﻭﺍﻟ ُﻌ ﱠﺰﻯ ،ﻭﻣﻨﺎﺓَ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔَ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ( ﻭﻫﻲ
َ 19ﻭ (20ﻗﻮﻟﻪ) :ﺃﻓﺮﺃﻳﺘﻢ
ﻣﻌﺒﻮﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻨﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺃﺿﺎﻑ ﻛﻼﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻔﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺠﻼﻻﻥ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﻠﻲ:
) (1ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﺒﺪ ﷲ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﺣﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻮﻓﻲ ﺳﻨﺔ 710ﻫـ:
"ﺇﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻧﺎﺩﻱ ﻗﻮﻣﻪ ]ﺃﻱ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻬﻢ[ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ
"ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺠﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻫﻮﻯ ،ﻣﺎ ﺿﻞ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻜﻢ ]ﺃﻱ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ[ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻏﻮﻯ" ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺑﻠﻎ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ:
ﺍﻟﻼﺕ ﻭﺍﻟ ُﻌ ﱠﺰﻯ ،ﻭﻣﻨﺎﺓَ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔَ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ( ﺟﺮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﺴﺎﻧﻪ )ﺃﻱ
َ )ﺃﻓﺮﺃﻳﺘﻢ
ﺃﺿﺎﻑ( "ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺍﻧﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻰ ]ﺃﻱ :ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﺎﻝ ،ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺍﺭ[ ﻭﺇﻥ
ﺷﻔﺎﻋﺘﻬﻦ ]ﺃﻱ ﻭﺳﺎﻁﺘﻬﻦ[ ﻟﺘﺮﺗﺠﻰ" ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻓﻨﺒﻬﻪ ﺟﺒﺮﻳﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ،ﻓﺄﺧﺒﺮﻫﻢ
ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻄﺎﻥ ...
)ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﺰء ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺹ (( (161
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺔ ﻣﻜﺬﻭﺑﺔ ﺑﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﺄﺕ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺳﻨﺪ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻗﻂ ﺑﻞ
ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ –ﻛﺬﺏ -ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺎﺩﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﻓﻘﻴﻦ !
ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ :ﻧﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻨﻴﻖ ﻟﻨﺴﻒ ﻗﺼﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺍﻧﻴﻖ!
ﻭﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻪ :ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﻓﺈﻧﻬﺎ ﺃﻭﺭﺩﺗﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻨﺪ
ﻷﻥ ﺩﻳﻨﻨﺎ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﻴﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﺋﻤﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﺨﻄﻮﻁﺎﺕ ﻻ ﻧﺪﺭﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﻻ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺟﺎءﺕ ﻟﻨﺎ ؟! ﻻ
ﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺔ ﺑﺈﺳﻨﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻜﺬﻭﺑﺔ !
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻄﺮﺳﻜﻢ !!
ﻭﺃﺧﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻀﺤﺾ ﺃﻱ ﺷﺒﻬﺔ ﺃﻧﻨﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﻮﺩﺗﻢ ﻣﻨﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﺭﺩ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻤﺪ ہﻠﻟ ﻻ ﻧﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﻹﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺗﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﺃﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﻓﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﷲ
ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﻘﻞ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﺳﻮﻳﺎ ...ﻟﺤﻤﺪ ہﻠﻟ
ﺕ َﻭ ْﺍﻟ ُﻌ ﱠﺰﻯ ) َ (19ﻭ َﻣﻨَﺎﺓَ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﻟِﺜَﺔَ ْﺍﻷُ ْﺧ َﺮﻯ ) (20ﺃَﻟَ ُﻜ ُﻢ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺬ َﻛ ُﺮ َﻭﻟَﻪُ ﺍﻟﻼ َﺃَﻓَ َﺮﺃَ ْﻳﺘُ ُﻢ ﱠ
ﺳ ﱠﻤ ْﻴﺘُ ُﻤﻮ َﻫﺎ ﺃَ ْﻧﺘُ ْﻢﺳ َﻤﺎ ٌء َ ﺿﻴ َﺰﻯ ) (22ﺇِﻥْ ِﻫ َﻲ ﺇِ ﱠﻻ ﺃَ ْ ْﺍﻷُ ْﻧﺜَ ﻰ) (21ﺗِ ْﻠ َ
ﻚ ﺇِ ًﺫﺍ ﻗِ ْﺴ َﻤﺔٌ ِ
ﻮﻥ ﺇِ ﱠﻻ ﺍﻟﻈﱠﻦﱠ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﺗَ ْﻬ َﻮﻯ ﺳ ْﻠﻄَ ٍ
ﺎﻥ ﺇِﻥْ ﻳَﺘﱠﺒِ ُﻌ َ ﷲُ ﺑِ َﻬﺎ ِﻣﻦْ ُ َﻭﺁَﺑَﺎ ُﺅ ُﻛ ْﻢ َﻣﺎ ﺃَ ْﻧ َﺰ َﻝ ﱠ
ﺲ َﻭﻟَﻘَ ْﺪ َﺟﺎ َء ُﻫ ْﻢ ِﻣﻦْ َﺭﺑﱢ ِﻬ ُﻢ ﺍ ْﻟ ُﻬ َﺪﻯ ) (23ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻢ ْﺍﻷَ ْﻧﻔُ ُ
ﻳﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﺡ ﻵﻟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻬﻢ "ﺇﻥ ﻫﻲ ﺇﻻ ﺃﺳﻤﺎء ﺳﻤﻴﺘﻤﻮﻫﺎ ﺃﻧﺘﻢ
ﻭﺁﺑﺎﺅﻛﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﷲ ﺑﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ !!!
ﻳﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﺡ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻬﻢ...ﺇﻥ ﻳﺘﺒﻌﻮﻥ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺗﻬﻮﻯ ﺍﻷﻧﻔﺲ ﻭﻟﻘﺪ
ﺟﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺑﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻬﺪﻯ !!!
ﻅﺎﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ .ﻧﻘﻮﻝ
ﻟﻪ :ﻟﻘﺪ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻋﻠﺔ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﻤﺔ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻼﻏﻴﺔ ﺭﺍﺋﻌﺔ
ﺇﺫ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺇﻧﻬﺎ "ﻧﺠﻮﻡ ﺗﺎﺋﻬﺔ" )ﻳﻬﻮﺫﺍ ﺁﻳﺔ (13
ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ
ﺑﺴﺘﺔ ﻗﺮﻭﻥ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻟﻢ ﻭﻟﻦ ﻧﺪﻋﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ .ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻨﺎ
ﻧﺮﻛﺰ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺭﻭﺣﻲ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺤﺘﺎﺝ
ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺬﺍء ﺭﻭﺣﻲ ،ﻭﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﻟﻤﺴﻴﺮﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺣﻴﺔ ﻧﺤﻮ ﷲ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺐ((.
ﻧﺠﻮﻡ ﺗﺎﺋﻬﺔ!!....
ﺃﻭﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﷲ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻼﻣﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻣﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﺑﻮﻫﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻭﺻﻞ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺋﻪ ﻷﻣﻪ ﻭﺃﺑﻴﻪ
)ﻟﻮﻗﺎ (48 : 2
ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﻲ ﻷﻋﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻗﺪﺭﻩ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻭﺭﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺇﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ –ﻗﺪﺍﺳﺘﻪ -ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻟﻜﻲ
ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﺨﺮﺝ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﻗﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﺤﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﺑﻞ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ
Jude:1:11ﻭﻳﻞ ﻟﻬﻢ ﻻﻧﻬﻢ ﺳﻠﻜﻮﺍ ﻁﺮﻳﻖ ﻗﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻧﺼﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺿﻼﻟﺔ ﺑﻠﻌﺎﻡ
ﻻﺟﻞ ﺍﺟﺮﺓ ﻭﻫﻠﻜﻮﺍ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺸﺎﺟﺮﺓ ﻗﻮﺭﺡ.
12ﻫﺆﻻء ﺻﺨﻮﺭ ﻓﻲ ﻭﻻﺋﻤﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺒﻴﺔ ﺻﺎﻧﻌﻴﻦ ﻭﻻﺋﻢ ﻣﻌﺎ ﺑﻼ ﺧﻮﻑ
ﺭﺍﻋﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ.ﻏﻴﻮﻡ ﺑﻼ ﻣﺎء ﺗﺤﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ ﺍﺷﺠﺎﺭ ﺧﺮﻳﻔﻴﺔ ﺑﻼ ﺛﻤﺮ ﻣﻴﺘﺔ
ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻔﺎ ﻣﻘﺘﻠﻌﺔ.
13ﺍﻣﻮﺍﺝ ﺑﺤﺮ ﻫﺎﺋﺠﺔ ﻣﺰﺑﺪﺓ ﺑﺨﺰﻳﻬﻢ.ﻧﺠﻮﻡ ﺗﺎﺋﻬﺔ ﻣﺤﻔﻮﻅ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻗﺘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻈﻼﻡ
ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻻﺑﺪ(SVD) .
ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ !
ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺇﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ ﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺃﺑﻮﻫﻢ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ " ﺗﺴﺎﺅﻻﺕ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ"
ﻭﺍﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ ..ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻭﻣﺴﻴﺤﻲ ﻭﺃﺷﻚ-ﺑﻌﺪ ﻗﺮﺍءﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ-
ﺃﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ!!
ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻔﻲ –ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ -ﻳﺴﻮﺩ ﻭﺟﻬﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺏ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :
ﺖ ﻧَ ْﻔ َﺴﻬَﺎ ﻟِﻠﻨﱠﺒِ ّﻰ { ﻭﺃﺣﻠﻠﻨﺎ ﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻬﺐ
))} ﻭﺍﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﱡﻣ ْﺆ ِﻣﻨَﺔً ﺇِﻥ َﻭﻫَﺒَ ْ
ﻟﻚ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻧﻮﻻ ﺗﻄﻠﺐ ﻣﻬﺮﺍً ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎء ﺍﻟﻤﺆﻣﻨﺎﺕ ﺇﻥ ﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﻫﺎ .
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ :ﻫﻮ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻦ
ﺑﺎﻟﻬﺒﺔ((
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﻱ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺗﺰﻭﺝ ﺃﻱ ﺃﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻬﺒﺔ
ﻭﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺺ ﺍﻟﻤﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺳﻨﺪ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻹﻁﻼﻕ !
ﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ "ﻗﻴﻞ" ﻭﻫﻲ ﺻﻴﻐﺔ
ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ...ﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻧﺄﺧﺬ ﺩﻳﻨﻨﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻨﺪ ﻭﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻓﺔ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺬﻭﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺭﻳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ ﻫﻲ ﺣﺠﺞ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪﺓ ..ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻄﺮﺳﻜﻢ !!
ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺼﻞ ﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺼﻮﻣﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ
ﻓﻘﻂ!!
ﻚﺖ ﻳَ ِﻤﻴﻨُ َ ْﺖ ﺃُﺟُﻮ َﺭﻫُ ﱠﻦ َﻭ َﻣﺎ َﻣﻠَ َﻜ ْ ﺍﻟﻼﺗِﻲ ﺁَﺗَﻴ َ ﻚ ﱠ ﻚ ﺃَ ْﺯ َﻭﺍ َﺟ َﻳَﺎ ﺃَﻳﱡﻬَﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺒِ ﱡﻲ ﺇِﻧﱠﺎ ﺃَﺣْ ﻠَ ْﻠﻨَﺎ ﻟَ َ
ﻚ ﺕ َﺧ َﺎﻻﺗِ َ ﻚ َﻭﺑَﻨَﺎ ِ ﺕ َﺧﺎﻟِ َ ﻚ َﻭﺑَﻨَﺎ ِ ﺕ َﻋ ﱠﻤﺎﺗِ َ ﻚ َﻭﺑَﻨَﺎ ِ ﺕ َﻋ ﱢﻤ َ ﻚ َﻭﺑَﻨَﺎ ِ ﷲُ َﻋﻠَ ْﻴ َ ِﻣ ﱠﻤﺎ ﺃَﻓَﺎ َء ﱠ
ﺖ ﻧَ ْﻔ َﺴﻬَﺎ ﻟِﻠﻨﱠﺒِ ﱢﻲ ﺇِ ْﻥ ﺃَ َﺭﺍ َﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺒِ ﱡﻲ ﺃَ ْﻥ ﻚ َﻭﺍ ْﻣ َﺮﺃَﺓً ُﻣ ْﺆ ِﻣﻨَﺔً ﺇِ ْﻥ َﻭﻫَﺒَ ْ ﺍﻟﻼﺗِﻲ ﻫَﺎ َﺟﺮْ َﻥ َﻣ َﻌ َ ﱠ
ﻴﻦ ﻗَ ْﺪ َﻋﻠِ ْﻤﻨَﺎ َﻣﺎ ﻓَ َﺮﺿْ ﻨَﺎ َﻋﻠَ ْﻴ ِﻬ ْﻢ ﻓِﻲ ﻭﻥ ْﺍﻟ ُﻤ ْﺆ ِﻣﻨِ َ
ﻚ ِﻣ ْﻦ ُﺩ ِ ﺼﺔ ً ﻟ َ َﻳَ ْﺴﺘَ ْﻨ ِﻜ َﺤﻬَﺎ َﺧﺎﻟِ َ
ﷲُ َﻏﻔُﻮﺭًﺍ َﺭ ِﺣﻴ ًﻤﺎ ﺎﻥ ﱠ ﻚ َﺣ َﺮ ٌﺝ َﻭ َﻛ َ ﻮﻥ َﻋﻠَ ْﻴ َ ﺖ ﺃَ ْﻳ َﻤﺎﻧُﻬُ ْﻢ ﻟِ َﻜﻴ َْﻼ ﻳَ ُﻜ َ ﺍﺟ ِﻬ ْﻢ َﻭ َﻣﺎ َﻣﻠَ َﻜ ْﺃَ ْﺯ َﻭ ِ
ﺖْﺖ ِﻣ ﱠﻤ ْﻦ َﻋ َﺰ ْﻟ َ ﻚ َﻣ ْﻦ ﺗَ َﺸﺎ ُء َﻭ َﻣ ِﻦ ﺍ ْﺑﺘَ َﻐﻴ َ ) (50ﺗُﺮْ ِﺟﻲ َﻣ ْﻦ ﺗَ َﺸﺎ ُء ِﻣ ْﻨﻬ ﱠُﻦ َﻭﺗُ ْﺆ ِﻭﻱ ﺇِﻟَ ْﻴ َ
ﺿﻴ َْﻦ ﺑِ َﻤﺎ ﺁَﺗَ ْﻴﺘَﻬ ﱠُﻦﻚ ﺃَ ْﺩﻧَﻰ ﺃَ ْﻥ ﺗَﻘَ ﱠﺮ ﺃَ ْﻋﻴُﻨُﻬ ﱠُﻦ َﻭ َﻻ ﻳَﺤْ َﺰ ﱠﻥ َﻭﻳَﺮْ َ ﻚ َﺫﻟِ َ ﻓَ َﻼ ُﺟﻨَﺎ َﺡ َﻋﻠَ ْﻴ َ
ﺴﺎ ُء ﷲُ َﻋﻠِﻴ ًﻤﺎ َﺣﻠِﻴ ًﻤﺎ ) َ (51ﻻ ﻳَ ِﺤ ﱡﻞ ﻟَ َﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﱢ َ ﺎﻥ ﱠﷲُ ﻳَ ْﻌﻠَ ُﻢ َﻣﺎ ﻓِﻲ ﻗُﻠُﻮﺑِ ُﻜ ْﻢ َﻭ َﻛ َ ُﻛﻠﱡﻬ ﱠُﻦ َﻭ ﱠ
ﺴﻨُ ُﻬﻦﱠ ﺇِ ﱠﻻ َﻣﺎ َﻣﻠَ َﻜﺖْ ﻳَ ِﻤﻴﻨُ َﻚ ﺍﺝ َﻭﻟَ ْﻮ ﺃَﻋ َْﺠﺒَ َﻚ ُﺣ ْ ِﻣﻦْ ﺑَ ْﻌ ُﺪ َﻭ َﻻ ﺃَﻥْ ﺗَﺒَ ﱠﺪ َﻝ ﺑِ ِﻬﻦﱠ ِﻣﻦْ ﺃَ ْﺯ َﻭ ٍ
ﷲُ َﻋﻠَﻰ ُﻛ ﱢﻞ ﺷ َْﻲ ٍء َﺭﻗِﻴﺒًﺎ ) (52ﺍﻷﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺎﻥ ﱠ َﻭ َﻛ َ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻳﻘﺘﻄﻊ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺟﺰﺍء ﻣﻦ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﻟﻴﻀﻠﻞ
ﺑﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻄﺎء !
ﻭﻁﺒﻌﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻘﻠﺔ ﺃﺩﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻭﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ ﺳﺄﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺑﺄﺩﺏ ﻭﺳﺄﺭﺑﻴﻪ ﻷﻥ ﺃﻣﻪ
ﻟﻢ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﻪ !!
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﻕ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻻ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ –ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻔﻲ -ﺃﻥ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ
ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎء ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺟﺎءﺕ ﺃﻭﻻ ﺛﻢ ﺟﺎءﺕ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ "ﺇﻧﺎ ﺃﺣﻠﻠﻨﺎ ﻟﻚ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺟﻚ" ..ﻭﻣﺎ
ﻣﺎﺕ ﺇﻻ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺣﻞ ﷲ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺰﻭﺝ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺎء !
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ )) ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﻌﻠﻖ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻔﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺔ" :ﻗﺎﻟﺖ
ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﻭﺃﻡ ﺳﻠﻤﺔ :ﻣﺎ ﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﷲ )ﺹ( ﺣﺘﻰ ﺃُ ِﺣ ﱠﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺰﻭﺝ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎء ﻣﺎ ﺷﺎء!!!! ،ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻄﺮﺩ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ :ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺴﺨﺖ!!!!.
ﻭﻧ ْﺴ ُﺨﻬﺎ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟ ﱡﺴﻨﱠ ِﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﺇﻧﺎ ﺃﺣﻠﻠﻨﺎ ﻟﻚ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺟﻚ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻣﻠﻜﺖ ﻳﻤﻴﻨﻚ ...
ﺇﻟﻰ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺭﻗﻢ "50ﻭﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺰﻭﻝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺤﻒ" )ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﺰء (( (451 :3
ﻭﻟﻠﺮﺩ ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﻣﺮﻭﻱ ﺑﻼ ﺳﻨﺪ )ﺃﻱ ﺑﻼ ﻋﻨﻌﻨﺔ( ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﻣﻜﺬﻭﺏ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺟﺎء ﺑﻼ
ﺳﻨﺪ ...ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻼ ﺳﻨﺪ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻳﺮﻣﻰ ﻓﻲ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﺎﻟﺴﻨﺪ ﻗﻮﺍﺋﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ...ﻭﺃﻅﻨﻚ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﺃﻳﻦ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ !
ﻓﺄﺭﻧﻲ ﺳﻨﺪﺍ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ ﻟﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﻓﻲ ﺃﻱ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺟﺎء ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ –ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺻﺢ –ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ؟!
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﻟﻮ ﻗﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﻧﺴﺦ ..ﻓﻬﻞ ﺗﺸﻚ ﻫﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺃﻡ
ﺑﺎﻵﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ؟ ﻓﺎﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻚ ﺑﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﻘﻴﻦ !
ﺛﺎﻟﺜﺎ :ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺻﻞ ﻳﺸﻬﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺬﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺬﻭﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻣﻨﺎ
ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﻓﺎﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻌﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﻫﻢ
ﺃﻣﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺆﻣﻨﻴﻦ ))ﻭﻫﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﻨﻬﻦ :ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ،ﺣﻔﺼﺔ ،ﺃﻡ
ﺣﺒﻴﺒﺔ ،ﺳﻮﺩﺓ ﺃﻡ ﺳﻠﻤﺔ ،ﺻﻔﻴﺔ ،ﻣﻴﻤﻮﻧﺔ ،ﺯﻳﻨﺐ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺟﺤﺶ ،ﺟﻮﻳﺮﻳﺔ((
ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺃﻥ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﺴﺨﺖ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ
ﺳﺒﻌﻤﺎﺋﺔ ﺯﻭﺟﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻣﺎﺕ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺒﻌﻤﺎﺋﺔ ﺯﻭﺟﺔ –ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺄﺗﻲ!-
ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺴﻊ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﺕ ..ﻓﺄﻳﻬﻦ ﻧﺴﺨﺖ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻳﺎ ﺫﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﻘﺮﻱ؟!
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺴﺎﺅﻝ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺮ ﻫﻨﺎ :ﻛﻴﻒ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﺒﻂ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ؟ ﻭﻟﻤﺎﺫﺍ
ﻳﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻊ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻌﻠﻪ؟؟!!
]ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺠﺮﺩ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﻳﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺔ ،ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻧﺴﺘﻔﺴﺮ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺮﺝ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻗﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻁﺊ" :ﻟﻢ ﺃﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺷﻲء ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﻂ ،ﻣﺎ ﺃﺗﺤﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻀﻪ ﻟﻀﻮء
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ]ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻧﺴﺎء ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺹ (( "[8
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺒﻲ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﺎﺕ
ﻓﻲ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺒﺎﺕ !
ﻓﺜﺒﺖ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺣﺐ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﺗﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﻨﺎ
ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ..ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺇﺧﻀﺎﻉ ﻋﻮﺍﻁﻔﻪ ﻓﻴﺤﺐ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﺗﻪ
ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ..ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺼﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ!
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﻣﺮ ﷲ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﺎﺕ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺒﻲ –ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺒﻲ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺏ"ﻭﻟﻦ ﺗﻌﺪﻟﻮﺍ".. -ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺄﻣﻮﺭﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺪﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻗﺎﺕ
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺒﺎﺕ ..ﺇﻟﺦ !
ﻭﻳﺴﺮﺩ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺑﺰﻭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ..ﻭﺟﻤﻊ ﺃﻛﺒﺮ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ..ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻬﻤﻪ ﻫﻞ
ﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻡ ﻻ ..ﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﺧﺘﺮﺍﻋﺎﺕ !
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﻱ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻴﺰ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ " } ﻭﻻ ﻳﺤﻞﱡ ﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎء ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ { ﺃَﻱْ
:ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺆﻻء ﺍﻟﺘﱢﺴﻊ"
ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻄﺮﺳﻜﻢ !!!
ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﻊ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭﺍ :
"-ﻓﺎﻁﻤﺔ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺳﺮﻳﺞ" ﻭﻳﺪﻋﻲ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﺒﺖ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻟﻪ..ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻟﻢ ﺃﺳﻤﻊ
ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ...ﻭﻻ ﺳﻤﻊ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﻻ ﺃﺳﺘﺒﻌﺪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻮﻗﻴﻦ ﺫﻫﻨﻴﺎ"ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ" ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻛﺘﺒﻬﺎ
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺸﺮﻗﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺧﺘﺮﻉ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﺳﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻓﺎﻕ!!
ﻭﻳﻌﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻦ "ﺧﻮﻟﺔ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ" ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺃﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺇﻗﺘﺮﺣﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺝ
ﺑﻌﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﻟﻤﺎ ﻣﺎﺗﺖ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪﺓ ﺧﺪﻳﺠﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻦ ﺟﻤﻴﻌﺎ !!
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻼﺗﻲ ﻋﺪﻫﻦ ﺯﻭﺭﺍ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻓﺎﻕ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎء ﺑﻬﻦ :
- -ﺃﺳﻤﺎء ﺑﻨﺖ ﺳﺒﺄ -ﺧﻮﻟﺔ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ -ﺃﻡ ﺸﺭﻴﻙ ﺒﻨﺕ ﺠﻠﺒﺭ -ﻓﺎﻁﻤﺔ ﺒﻨﺕ ﺍﻟﻀﺤﺎﻙ
-ﺭﻴﺤﺎﻨﺔ ﺒﻨﺕ ﺯﻴﺩ -ﻫﺒﻠﺔ ﺑﻨﺖ ﻗﻴﺲ ﺃﺧﺖ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺚ!!
-ﺇﻥ ﻋﺩﺩ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺼﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺴﻠﻡ ﺜﻼﺙ ﻋﺸﺭﺓ .
-ﺩﺨﻝ ﺒﺈﺤﺩﻯ ﻋﺸﺭﺓ ﻓﻬﻥ ﺃﻤﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺅﻤﻨﻴﻥ .
-ﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﻋﻥ ﺘﺴﻊ ،ﺇﺫ ﻤﺎﺘﺕ ﻓﻲ ﺤﻴﺎﺘﻪ ﺨﺩﻴﺠﺔ ،ﻭﺯﻴﻨﺏ ﺃﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻜﻴﻥ .
-ﻭﺘﺯﻭﺝ ﺒﺎﺜﻨﺘﻴﻥ ﻟﻡ ﻴﺩﺨﻝ ﺒﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻤﺎ :
ﺃﺴﻤﺎﺀ ﺒﻨﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻨﹾﺩﻴﺔ .
ﺃﻤﻴﻤﺔ ﺒﻨﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺎﻥ ﺒﻥ ﺸﺭﺤﺒﻴﻝ .
ﺯﻭﺠﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺭﺴﻭﻝ
ﺃﻭﻝ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻟﺪﻱ ....ﻻﺣﻆ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﺔ ﺭﻗﻢ 18ﺇﻟﻰ 54ﻛﻠﻬﻦ ﻟﻢ
ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ!!..
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ :ﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺇﺳﺘﻘﻰ ﻋﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﺖ
ﺃﻛﻠﻤﻬﻢ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻟﻲ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻏﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻟﺰﻭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺃﻗﻠﻬﺎ 55ﺃﻭ 66ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﻗﺎﻝ !! 99
ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺃﻁﺎﻟﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﻜﺄﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺅﻭﺳﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺮ !!
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻑ ﺿﺎﺭﺑﺎ ﻓﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺺ !!
ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻓﻮﺟﺪﻩ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ
ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺯﻭﺟﺔ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﻞ ﻛﻞ 50ﻳﻮﻡ ﺯﻭﺟﺔ !!!
ﺛﻢ ﻳﻜﻤﻞ ﻛﻮﻣﻴﺪﻳﺎﻩ ))ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺴﺎﺅﻝ ﻫﻨﺎ :ﻛﻴﻒ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻏﺎ ﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﷲ؟
ﻟﻘﺪ ﺳﺠﻞ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻔﺮﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺫﺍﻉ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ "ﻣﺎ ﻟﻤﺤﻤﺪ ﺷﻐﻞ ﺇﻻ
ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻭﺝ" )ﺩﺭﻭﺱ ﻗﺮﺁﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﺰء 2ﺹ (832ﻭﻳﻜﻤﻞ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ" :ﻓﺤﺴﺪﻭﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺄﻧﺰﻝ ﷲ "ﺃﻡ ﻳﺤﺴﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺁﺗﺎﻫﻢ ﷲ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻀﻠﻪ" )ﺳﻮﺭﺓ
ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎء(( (54 :4
ﺛﻢ ﻟﻮ ﻓﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﺣﺎﻗﺪ...ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺮﺿﻰ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ
ﻭﻳﻌﺘﺒﺮﻩ ﺇﺳﺘﺪﻻﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ
ﻟﻘﺪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺃﻗﺮﺑﺎء ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭﺍ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ:
Mk:3:21ﻭﻟﻤﺎ ﺳﻤﻊ ﺍﻗﺮﺑﺎﺅﻩ ﺧﺮﺟﻮﺍ ﻟﻴﻤﺴﻜﻮﻩ ﻻﻧﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ.
)(SVD
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻄﻬﺮ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺲ ﻭﻳﺪﺍﻭﻳﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺿﻬﻢ ....ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺿﻬﻢ
ﻫﻨﺎ .......ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﺻﻨﺎﻡ ..........ﻭ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ہﻠﻟ ....ﻭﺍﻻﺷﺮﺍﻙ ﺑﻪ .......ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻧﺎ ......ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎﺛﺔ ..........
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺮﻗﺔ .........ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻴﺎﻧﺔ ...........ﻭﻗﻄﻊ ﺻﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ .........ﻭﺍﻟﻈﻠﻢ .......ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ .....ﻭﺇﻳﺬﺍء
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ............ﻭﺳﻮء ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻖ ...........ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺘﺤﺎﺭ ..........ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ .ﺇﻻ ﺍﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﺠﺪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺒﻴﺎﺋﻪ ﻓﺎﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺘﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﻟﻴﻜﻔﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﺎہﻠﻟ .....ﻭﻳﺸﺮﻛﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ......ﻭﻳﺰﻧﻮﺍ
ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻌﻴﺪﺓ ........ﻭﻳﻘﺘﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﻼ ﻋﻔﻮ ..........ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎﺛﺔ ﺩﻳﺪﻧﻬﻢ .......ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﺻﻨﺎﻡ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ
............ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻬﻢ ..........ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻴﺎﻧﺔ ﺃﻣﻠﻬﻢ .........ﻭﻗﻄﻊ ﺻﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ
ﻭﺇﻳﺬﺍء ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺳﻮء ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻖ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺘﺤﺎﺭ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺘﻬﻢ ......ﻭﻛﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺛﻨﺎء ﻓﺘﺮﺓ ﻧﺒﻮﺗﻬﻢ!!!!!! .ﻟﻌﻠﻚ
ﻻﺗﺼﺪﻗﻨﻲ ..........ﺑﻞ ﻟﻌﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﺑﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ......ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻲ ﺍﻧﻨﻲ ﺃﻫﺬﻱ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻧﻨﻲ ﻣﺼﺎﺏ
ﺑﻠﻮﺙ ﻋﻘﻠﻲ ............ﻻ .......ﻻ .....ﻭﷲ .........ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﷲ
ﺇﻥ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻻﺗﺼﺪﻗﻨﻲ .........ﺍﻓﺘﺢ ﻳﺎﺭﺟﻞ ...........ﺍﻓﺘﺢ " ...........ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ
.....ﻭﻣﻊ ﺍﻋﺘﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﻢ ﻟﻀﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺎﻥ"!!!!!!!!!!!
ﺍﻓﺘﺢ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻰ 4 -2 :16ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ً ﺍﻓﺘﺢ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻰ 4 - 2 : 28
ﻭﺍﻗﺮﺃ ...........................ﻧﺒﻰ ﷲ ﺁﺣﺎﺯ ﻳﻌﺒﺪ ﺍﻷﻭﺛﺎﻥ !!!
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺷﻬﺪ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻓﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﺻﺤﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻌﺔ ] [ 7 : 2ﺷﻬﺪ ﻟﻨﺒﻲ
ﺳﺪُﻭ َﻡ َﻭ َﻋ ُﻤﻮ َﺭﺓَ ﷲ ﻟﻮﻁ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺡ ﻭﺍﻹﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ َ )) :ﻭﺇِ ْﺫ َﺣ َﻜ َﻢ ﷲُ َﻋﻠَﻰ َﻣ ِﺪﻳﻨَﺘ َْﻲ َ
ﺎﺟ َﺮﺓًَ .ﻭﻟَ ِﻜﻨﱠﻪُ ﺃَ ْﻧﻘَ َﺬ ﻟُﻮﻁﺎ ً ﺍ ْﻟﺒَﺎ ﱠﺭ،ﺏَ ،ﺣ ﱠﻮﻟَ ُﻬ َﻤﺎ ﺇِﻟَﻰ َﺭ َﻣﺎ ٍﺩَ ،ﺟﺎ ِﻋﻼً ِﻣ ْﻨ ُﻬ َﻤﺎ ِﻋ ْﺒ َﺮﺓً ﻟِﻠﱠ ِﺬﻳﻦَ ﻳَ ِﻌﻴﺸُﻮﻥَ َﺣﻴَﺎﺓً ﻓَ ِ ﺑِﺎ ْﻟ َﺨ َﺮﺍ ِ
ﺳﺎ ِﻛﻨﺎ ً ﺑَ ْﻴﻨَ ُﻬ ْﻢَ ،ﻭ ُﻫ َﻮ َﺭ ُﺟ ٌﻞ ﺑَﺎ ﱞﺭ،ﺷ َﺮﺍ ِﺭ َﺯ َﻣﺎﻧِ ِﻪ ﻓِﻲ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﻋَﺎ َﺭ ِﺓ .ﻓَﺈِ ْﺫ َﻛﺎﻥَ َ ﻮﻙ ﺃَ ْ
ﺳﻠ ُ ِ ﻀﺎﻳِﻘﺎ ً ِﺟ ّﺪﺍً ِﻣﻦْ ُ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬﻱ َﻛﺎﻥَ ُﻣﺘَ َ
ﺴ َﻤ ُﻊ ﺑِ َﻬﺎَ .ﻭ َﻫ َﻜ َﺬﺍ ﻧَ َﺮﻯ ﺃَﻥﱠ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮ ﱠ
ﺏ ﺴﻪُ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺰ ِﻛﻴﱠﺔُ ﺗَﺘَﺄَﻟﱠ ُﻢ ﻳَ ْﻮ ِﻣﻴّﺎ ً ِﻣﻦْ َﺟ َﺮﺍﺋِ ِﻤ ِﻬ ِﻢ ﺍﻟﱠﺘِﻲ َﻛﺎﻥَ ﻳَ َﺮﺍﻫَﺎ ﺃَ ْﻭ ﻳَ َْﻛﺎﻧَﺖْ ﻧَ ْﻔ ُ
ﻳَ ْﻌ ِﺮﻑُ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳُ ْﻨﻘِ َﺬ ﺍﻷَ ْﺗﻘِﻴَﺎ َء ِﻣﻦَ ﺍ ْﻟ ِﻤ ْﺤﻨَ ِﺔ(( ،
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﺘﻞ ..................ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﺟﻤﻴﻌﺎ ........ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ...............ﺷﻤﺸﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻧﻲ .....
"ﺃﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ"!!!!!! ....ﺃﺑﺎﺩﻭﺍ ﺃﻣﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺑﺮﻳﺎء.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻼﻧﺘﺤﺎﺭ ..................ﻓﺈﻥ ﻧﺒﻲ ﷲ ﺷﺎﺅﻝ ............ﻭﺍﻟﺪ ﺯﻭﺟﺔ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ............ﺍﻧﺘﺤﺮ
....ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪﻛﻢ ﻧﺒﻲ ﻣﺴﺤﻪ ﷲ.
ﺛﻢ ﺍﻧﻬﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺠﺰء ﻣﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ................ﻣﺘﺴﺎﺋﻼ .............ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﺶ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺤﺶ .......ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﻴﻦ ........ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺮﺃﺗﻢ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ....ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺯﻭﺟﺘﻪ .......ﻧﻌﻢ ﻭﷲ ﺯﻭﺟﺘﻪ ......ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻻﻧﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺯﻭﺟﺘﻪ!!!!!
............ﺃﻻ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻮﻥ؟!!!!!
ﻣﺮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ................ﻣﻊ ﺍﻋﺘﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﻢ ﻟﻀﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺎﻥ"!!!!!!!!!!!
ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ .....
ﻭﺃﻋﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺹ )) 2ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﻗﺪﻭﺓ ﻟﻤﻦ ﻳﺪﻋﻮﻫﻢ
ﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺜﺮﻫﻢ" :ﻧﻌﻄﻴﻜﻢ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﻗﺪﻭﺓ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﺎ" ) 2ﺗﺲ(( (9 :3
ﻭﻳﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻻ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻟﻬﺎ ..ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺃﻋﻄﻲ ﻗﻮﺓ
30ﺭﺟﻼ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺐ ﻓﺒﺄﻱ ﺣﻖ ﺗﻘﻠﺒﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻋﻴﺒﺎ؟
ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺬﻧﺐ ﻭﻣﺪﺍﻥ –ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻣﻔﺮﻭﻍ ﻣﻨﻪ -ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺒﺤﺜﻮﺍ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻬﻤﺔ !!
ﻓﻠﻮ ﺃﻧﺠﺐ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﺍ ...ﻟﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ !
ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﻧﺠﺐ ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ..ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻋﺠﺰ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ !
ﻭﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ...ﻓﻔﻲ ﺹ ..12ﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﻪ ﺃﻋﻄﻲ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻙ 30
ﺭﺟﻞ ﻭﻳﺪﻭﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺴﺎءﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻊ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﺼﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺹ
23ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﺟﺰ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺎ !!
ﺷﻴﺰﻭﻓﺮﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﻓﺼﺎﻡ ﻛﻔﺮﻱ ﻏﺒﻲ !!
ﺃﻻ ﻟﻌﻨﺔ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻟﻤﻴﻦ !!...
ﺛﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻳﺎ ﺃﻏﺒﻰ ﺧﻠﻖ ﷲ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺃﻭﻻﺩﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻬﺠﺮﺓ ﻛﺈﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻟﺪ !!
ﻓﺄﻳﻦ ﺷﺒﻬﺔ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻭﺃﺳﺌﻠﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻳﺮﺟﻮ ﻣﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺬﻫﺐ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺷﻴﻮﺧﻨﺎ؟!
ﻭﺃﻭﺭﺩﺕ ﻗﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﺩﺏ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺮ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻴﺮ
ﻣﺒﺮﺭ ﻟﻜﻲ ﺃﺭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﺏ ..ﻭﻟﻴﻌﺮﻓﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺳﻠﻮﺑﻲ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺊ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮ!!
ﻓﺎﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﺍﻟﺠﻨﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺬﻭﺫ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺃﺳﻒ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺏ ﻟﻴﺴﻮﻉ "ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ" ﻭﻧﺤﻦ ﻧﺒﺮﺃ ﺇﻟﻰ ﷲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ !!
ﻓﻌﺎﺵ ﻭﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﺭﻳﺎ ﻓﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻐﺳﻝ ﺃﺭﺟﻝ ﺍﻟﺗﻼﻣﻳﺫ ﻛﻣﺎ ﻓﻰ )ﻳﻭﺣﻧﺎ : 13
6-4ﻗﺎﻡ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺷﺎء ﻭﺧﻠﻊ ﺛﻳﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺧﺫ ﻣﻧﺷﻔﺔ ﻭﺍ ّﺗﺯﺭ ﺑﻬﺎ 5ﺛﻡ
ﺻﺏّ ﻣﺎء ﻓﻲ ﻣﻐﺳﻝ ﻭﺍﺑﺗﺩﺃ ﻳﻐﺳﻝ ﺍﺭﺟﻝ ﺍﻟﺗﻼﻣﻳﺫ ﻭﻳﻣﺳﺣﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﻧﺷﻔﺔ
ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺗﺯﺭﺍ ﺑﻬﺎ.
ﺃﻣﺴﻚ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﺴﻮ ﺑﻬﺎ ﻧﺼﻔﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻲ ﻭﺟﻠﺲ ﻳﻤﺴﺢ ﺃﺭﺟﻞ
ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ..ﻭﻓﻲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻳﺠﻠﺲ ﻋﺎﺭﻳﺎ ﻛﻴﻮﻡ ﻭﻟﺪﺗﻪ ﺃﻣﻪ ﻓﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ
ﻫﺬﺍ؟ ﻭﺃﺿﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺘﺰﻭﺝ ؟!
ﻭﺃﻋﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺹ )) 2ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﻗﺪﻭﺓ ﻟﻤﻦ ﻳﺪﻋﻮﻫﻢ
ﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺜﺮﻫﻢ" :ﻧﻌﻄﻴﻜﻢ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﻗﺪﻭﺓ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﺎ" ) 2ﺗﺲ(( (9 :3
ﺑﻝ ﻭﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﻓﻳﻘﻭﻝ ﺗﺣﺕ ﻋﻧﻭﺍﻥ "ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺤﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻔﺎﻑ " ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺛﻮﻟﻴﻜﻴﺔ
ُﺤﺮﺟﻮﻩ)) :ﺃَﻳَ ِﺤﻞﱡ ﻷَ َﺣ ٍﺪ ﺃَ ﻥ ﻣﺘﻰ 3 : 19ﻓَﺪﻧﺎ ﺇِﻟﻴ ِﻪ ﺑﻌﺾُ ﺍﻟﻔِﺮﱢﻳﺴﻴﱢﻴﻦ ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﻟِﻴ ِ
ﻖ ﺍﻣ َﺮﺃَﺗَﻪ ﻷَﻳﱠ ِﺔ ِﻋﻠﱠ ٍﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ؟ (( 4ﻓﺄَﺟﺎﺏ)) :ﺃَﻣﺎ ﻗَﺮﺃﺗُﻢ ﺃَ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻟِ َ
ﻖ ُﻣﻨ ُﺬ ﺍﻟﺒَﺪ ِء ﻳُﻄَﻠﱢ َ
َﺟﻌﻠَﻬﻤﺎ َﺫ َﻛﺮﺍً َﻭﺃُﻧﺜﻰ 5ﻭﻗﺎﻝ:
ﻨﺎﻥ ﺟ َﺴﺪﺍً ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍً.ﺍﻻﺛ ِ ﻙ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮ ُﺟ ُﻞ ﺃَﺑﺎﻩُ ﻭﺃُ ﱠﻣﻪ ﻭﻳَﻠ َﺰ ُﻡ ﺍﻣ َﺮﺃَﺗَﻪ ﻭﻳﺼﻴ ُﺮ ْ ﻚ ﻳَﺘ ُﺮ ُﻟِ َﺬﻟِ َ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻚ ،ﺑﻞ َﺟ َﺴ ٌﺪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ .ﻓﻤﺎ ﺟ َﻤ َﻌﻪ ﷲ ﻓﻼ ﻳُﻔﺮﱢﻗﻨﱠﻪ ِ ﻴﻦ ﺑﻌ َﺪ ﺫﻟ َﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺛﻨَ ِ
ِ 6ﻓﻼ
ﻕ ﻭﺗُ َﺴﺮﱠﺡ؟ (( 8ﻗﺎ َﻝ ﺘﺎﺏ ﻁَﻼ ٍ ((7 .ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻟﻪ)) :ﻓﻠِﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﺃَ َﻣ َﺮ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺃَﻥ ﺗُﻌْﻄﻰ ِﻛ َ
ﻼﻕ ﻧِﺴﺎﺋﻜﻢ ،ﻭﻟَﻢ ﻳَ ُﻜ ِﻦ ﺺ ﻟَﻜﻢ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻓﻲ ﻁَ ِ ﻟﻬﻢِ )) :ﻣﻦ ﺃَﺟْ ِﻞ ﻗﺴﺎ َﻭ ِﺓ ﻗُﻠﻮﺑِﻜﻢ َﺭ ﱠﺧ َ
ﻖ ﺍﻣ َﺮﺃَﺗَﻪ ،ﺇِﻻﱠ ﻟِﻔَﺤْ ﺸﺎء، ﺍﻷَﻣ ُﺮ ُﻣﻨ ُﺬ ﺍﻟﺒَﺪ ِء ﻫﻜﺬﺍ9 .ﺃَ ﱠﻣﺎ ﺃَﻧﺎ ﻓﺄَﻗﻮ ُﻝ ﻟﻜﻢَ :ﻣﻦ ﻁَﻠﱠ َ
ﻭﺗَﺰ ﱠﻭ َﺝ ﻏﻴ َﺮﻫﺎ ﻓﻘَﺪ َﺯﻧﻰ ((.
10ﻓﻘﺎ َﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﱠﻼﻣﻴﺬ)) :ﺇِﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧَﺖ ﺣﺎﻟَﺔُ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮﺟ ُِﻞ َﻣ َﻊ ﺍﻟ َﻤﺮﺃَ ِﺓ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻼ َﺧﻴ َﺮ ﻓﻲ
ﺬﻳﻦ ﺃُﻧ ِﻌ َﻢ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺰﻭﺍﺝ ((11 .ﻓﻘﺎ َﻝ ﻟﻬﻢ)) :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼ ُﻡ ﻻ ﻳَﻔﻬَ ُﻤﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎﺱُ ُﻛﻠﱡﻬﻢِ ،
ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﱠ َ
ُﻄﻮﻥ ﺃُ ﱠﻣﻬﺎﺗِﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫ ِﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻝ، ﻴﺎﻥ ُﻭﻟِﺪﻭﺍ ِﻣﻦ ﺑ ِ ﻙ ِﺧﺼْ ٌ ﻋﻠَﻴ ِﻬﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ12 .ﻓﻬُﻨﺎ َ
ﺴﻬﻢ ِﻣﻦ ﺃَ ِ
ﺟﻞ ﺼﻮﺍ ﺃَﻧﻔُ َ ﺼﻴﺎﻥٌ َﺧ َ ﻴﺎﻥ َﺧﺼﺎﻫُ ُﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎﺱ ،ﻭﻫُﻨﺎﻙ ِﺧ ْ ﻙ ِﺧﺼْ ٌ ﻭﻫُﻨﺎ َ
ﺴ َﻤﻮﺍﺕ .ﻓَ َﻤ ِﻦ ﺍﺳﺘَﻄﺎ َﻉ ﺃَﻥ ﻳَﻔ َﻬ َﻢ ﻓَﻠﻴَﻔ َﻬ ْﻢ! ((. ﺕ ﺍﻟ ﱠ َﻣﻠﻜﻮ ِ
ﻫﻧﻳﺋﺎ ﺍﻟﻣﻠﻛﻭﺕ ﻟﻠﻣﺧﺻﻳﻳﻥ ..ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺫﻳﻥ ﺃﻧﻌﻡ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻳﻬﻡ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻧﺑﻳﻳﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺻﺩﻳﻘﻳﻥ
ﻭﺍﻟﺷﻬﺩﺍء !!!!
ﻓﻌﺪﻡ ﺯﻭﺍﺟﻪ ﻭﺩﻋﻮﺗﻪ ﻟﻠﺨﺼﻲ ﻭﺩﻋﻮﺗﻪ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺝ ﻭﺟﻠﻮﺳﻪ ﻋﺎﺭﻳﺎ ﻛﻴﻮﻡ
ﻭﻟﺪﺗﻪ ﺃﻣﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻣﻴﺬ ﻳﺴﺎﻭﻱ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺗﻮﺻﻞ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺑﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻓﺔ
ﺟﺪﺍ...ﻭﻣﻦ ﺇﺳﺘﻄﺎﻉ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﻓﻠﻴﻔﻬﻢ !!
ﻭﺃﻋﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺹ )) 2ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﻗﺪﻭﺓ ﻟﻤﻦ ﻳﺪﻋﻮﻫﻢ
ﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺜﺮﻫﻢ" :ﻧﻌﻄﻴﻜﻢ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﻗﺪﻭﺓ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﺎ" ) 2ﺗﺲ(( (9 :3
ﻭﺃﻛﺮﺭ ﻧﺤﻦ ﻧﺒﺮﺃ ﺇﻟﻰ ﷲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺴﺐ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺠﻠﻮﺱ ﻋﺎﺭﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻟﻠﺨﺼﻲ ﻭﺷﺮﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺨﻤﺮ ﻭﺗﺪﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﺍﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺇﺻﺪﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺮﺳﻮﻣﺎ ﻳﺤﺾ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺎ ﺑﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﻏﺒﻴﺔ "ﻣﻦ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻜﻢ ﺑﻼﺧﻄﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﺑﺤﺠﺮ" ..ﻓﻜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﺗﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺘﺒﺔ
ﺍﻷﻧﺎﺟﻴﻞ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻓﻠﻴﻘﺮﺃ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ..ﺃﻧﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺇﻻ ﺫﻟﻚ!
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺃﺛﺎﺭ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺳﺆﺍﻻ ﻫﺎﻣﺎ ..ﺃﻻ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺘﺰﻭﺝ ﺑﺘﺴﻊ ﻧﺴﻮﺓ
ﻭﷲ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻉ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﺟﻴﺪ ﻟﻮ ﺳﺄﻟﻪ ﺑﺈﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﻣﻬﺬﺏ:
ﻭﻟﻠﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ
ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺒﻰ "ﺻﻠﻰ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ" ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ....ﻟﻤﺎﺫﺍ؟ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻁﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻰ "ﺻﻠﻰ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ" ﺯﻭﺟﺎﺗﻪ
ﻭﺗﻤﺴﻚ ﺑﺄﺭﺑﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺰﻭﺝ ﺃﻯ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻦ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ "ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻜﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺆﺫﻭﺍ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﷲ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻨﻜﺤﻮﺍ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﺃﺑﺪﺍً ﺇﻥ ﺫﻟﻜﻢ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﷲ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺎ ً" .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻯ ﺍﻣﺮﺁﺓ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺃﻣﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺆﻣﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻁﻠﻘﺎ ﺯﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﻀﺖ ﻋﺪﺗﻬﺎ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺰﻭﺝ ﺑﺄﻯ ﺭﺟﻞ ﺃﺧﺮ.
ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﻧﺴﺎءﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻷﻥ ﻧﺴﺎء ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻮﻙ –ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺘﺮﻣﻴﻦ -ﻻ ﻳﺘﺰﻭﺟﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﻣﻮﺕ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺟﻬﻦ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺑﺎﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻤﻠﻚ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻓﻠﻴﺄﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺎء ﻧﺒﻲ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﺒﻴﺎءﻩ ﺗﺰﻭﺟﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ؟!!
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺗﻌﺪﺩ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺇﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻛﻔﺮ
ﻭﺷﻴﺰﻭﻓﺮﻧﻴﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ !
ﻫﻞ ﺗﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺑﻚ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ؟
ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻻ !!!
ﺳﻴﻘﻮﻝ ..ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺅﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ..ﺣﺴﻨﺎ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻋﻨﺪﻙ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ
ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺮﺳﻠﻴﻦ ﺗﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﺎﺕ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ؟!!
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﻧﻚ ﻟﺴﺖ ﻣﻠﺤﺪﺍ ..ہﻠﻟ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻜﻢ "ﻳﺎ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ" ﻭﻫﻲ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺓ
ﻟﺘﺮﺟﻌﻮﺍ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻜﻢ ﻟﻜﻲ ﺗﺼﻞ ﻟﻠﺤﻖ ﺑﻮﺿﻮﺡ!!
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻁﺎﻟﺐ ﺣﻖ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻭﺟﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻣﻊ
ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﻟﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻳﻔﻀﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻣﻲ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺤﻘﺪ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺸﺎء !!
ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺃﻱ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﻨﻜﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺗﻌﺪﺩ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ؟
ﺃﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﺪﻳﻚ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ...ﺃﻡ ﺃﻧﻚ ﻣﻠﺤﺪ؟
ُﻀﻠﱡ َ
ﻮﻥ ﺇِ ﱠﻻ ُﻀﻠﱡﻮﻧَ ُﻜ ْﻢ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﻳ ِ ﺏ ﻟَ ْﻮ ﻳ ِ ﺕ ﻁَﺎﺋِﻔَﺔٌ ِﻣ ْﻦ ﺃَ ْﻫ ِﻞ ْﺍﻟ ِﻜﺘَﺎ ِ ﺻﺪﻕ ﷲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞَ :ﻭ ﱠﺩ ْ
ﻭﻥ .ﻳَ ﺎ ﷲِ َﻭﺃَ ْﻧﺘُ ْﻢ ﺗَ ْﺸﻬَ ُﺪ َ
ﺕ ﱠ ُﻭﻥ ﺑِﺂَﻳَﺎ ِ
ﺏ ﻟِ َﻢ ﺗَ ْﻜﻔُﺮ َُﻭﻥ .ﻳَﺎ ﺃَ ْﻫ َﻞ ْﺍﻟ ِﻜﺘَﺎ ِ
ﺃَ ْﻧﻔُ َﺴﻬُ ْﻢ َﻭ َﻣ ﺎ ﻳَ ْﺸ ُﻌﺮ َ
ﻖ َﻭﺃَ ْﻧﺘُ ْﻢ ﺗَ ْﻌﻠَ ُﻤ َ
ﻮﻥ. ﻮﻥ ْﺍﻟ َﺤ ﱠ
ﺎﻁ ِﻞ َﻭﺗَ ْﻜﺘُ ُﻤ َﻖ ﺑِ ْﺎﻟﺒَ ِ
ُﻮﻥ ْﺍﻟ َﺤ ﱠ
ﺏ ﻟِ َﻢ ﺗَ ْﻠﺒِﺴ َ
ﺃَ ْﻫ َﻞ ْﺍﻟ ِﻜﺘَﺎ ِ
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﻣﺎ ﺃﺟﻤﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻓﻲ ﺹ )) 2ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﻗﺪﻭﺓ ﻟﻤﻦ
ﻳﺪﻋﻮﻫﻢ ﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺜﺮﻫﻢ" :ﻧﻌﻄﻴﻜﻢ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﻗﺪﻭﺓ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﺎ"
)2ﺗﺲ(( (9 :3
ﻚ ﻻَ ﺗَﺘَﻨَﺒﱠﻪُ ﺇِﻟَﻰ ْﺍﻟ َﺨ َﺸﺒَ ِﺔ ْﺍﻟ َﻜﺒِﻴ َﺮ ِﺓ ﻓِﻲ ﻚَ ،ﻭﻟ ِﻜﻨﱠ َ َﻭﻟِ َﻤﺎ َﺫﺍ ﺗُﻼَ ِﺣﻆُ ْﺍﻟﻘَ ﱠﺸﺔَ ﻓِﻲ َﻋﻴ ِْﻦ ﺃَ ِﺧﻴ َ
ﺝ ْﺍﻟﻘَ ﱠﺸﺔَ ﺍﻟﱠﺘِﻲ ﻓِﻲ ُ
ﻚ :ﻳَﺎﺃَ ِﺧﻲَ ،ﺩ ْﻋﻨِﻲ ﺃ ْﺧ ِﺮ ِ ْﻒ ﺗَ ْﻘ ِﺪ ُﺭ ﺃَ ْﻥ ﺗَﻘُﻮ َﻝ ﻷَ ِﺧﻴ َ
ﻚ؟ ﺃَ ْﻭ َﻛﻴ َ َﻋ ْﻴﻨِ َ
ﺖ .ﻳَﺎ ُﻣ َﺮﺍﺋِﻲ ،ﺃَ ْﺧ ِﺮﺝْ ﺃَ ﱠﻭﻻً ﻚ ﺃَ ْﻧ َ ﻼﺣﻆُ ْﺍﻟ َﺨ َﺸﺒَﺔَ ﺍﻟﱠﺘِﻲ ﻓﻲ َﻋ ْﻴﻨِ َ ﺖ ﻻَ ﺗ ُ ِ ﻚ! ﻭﺃَ ْﻧ ََﻋ ْﻴﻨِ َ
ْﺼ ُﺮ َﺟﻴﱢﺪﺍً ﻟِﺘُ ْﺨ ِﺮ َﺝ ْﺍﻟﻘَ ﱠﺸﺔَ ﺍﻟﱠﺘِﻲ ﻓِﻲ َﻋﻴ ِْﻦ ﺃَ ِﺧﻴ َ
ﻚ. ﻚَ ،ﻭ ِﻋ ْﻨ َﺪﺋِ ٍﺬ ﺗُﺒ ِْﺍﻟ َﺨ َﺸﺒَﺔَ ِﻣ ْﻦ َﻋ ْﻴﻨِ َ
ﻟُﻮﻗَ ﺎ 42 - 41 : 6
ﻭﻟﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﻋﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻧﺠﺐ 70ﻭﻟﺪﺍً :ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻧﺴﺎﺋﻪ ﺇﺫﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ 23
ﺍﻣﺮﺃﺓ.
ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺑﻞ ﻗﺎﻝ :
Heb:11:32ﻭﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﺍﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻳﻀﺎ ﻻﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﻮﺯﻧﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﺒﺮﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺟﺪﻋﻮﻥ
ﻭﺑﺎﺭﺍﻕ ﻭﺷﻤﺸﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻭﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﻭﺻﻤﻮﺋﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﻴﺎء 33ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻤﺎﻥ
ﻗﻬﺮﻭﺍ ﻣﻤﺎﻟﻚ ﺻﻨﻌﻮﺍ ﺑﺮﺍ ﻧﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻣﻮﺍﻋﻴﺪ ﺳﺪﻭﺍ ﺍﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﺳﻮﺩ )(SVD
ﻧﺴﺎء ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻫﻮﺷﻊ ﺑﻦ ﻧﻮﻥ )ﻓﺘﻰ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ( ﺯﻭﺟﺘﻴﻦ ﻫﻦ:ﺯﻭﺟﺘﻴﻦ ﻫﻮﺷﻊ -2 :1
3ﻭ ﻫﻮﺷﻊ : 2-1 3
Gn:36:6: 6ﺛﻢ ﺍﺧﺬ ﻋﻴﺴﻮ ﻧﺴﺎءﻩ ﻭﺑﻨﻴﻪ ﻭﺑﻨﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﻧﻔﻮﺱ ﺑﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﻣﻮﺍﺷﻴﻪ
ﻭﻛﻞ ﺑﻬﺎﺋﻤﻪ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﻘﺘﻨﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﻨﻰ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺭﺽ ﻛﻨﻌﺎﻥ ﻭﻣﻀﻰ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﺭﺽ
ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺏ ﺃﺧﻴﻪ(SVD) .
Gn:30:2: 2ﻓﺤﻤﻲ ﻏﻀﺐ ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺍﺣﻴﻞ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻟﻌﻠﻲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﷲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻣﻨﻊ ﻋﻨﻚ ﺛﻤﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ .ﻓﻘﺎﻟﺖ ﻫﻮ ﺫﺍ ﺟﺎﺭﻳﺘﻲ ﺑﻠﻬﺔ.ﺍﺩﺧﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﻠﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺭﻛﺒﺘ ّﻲ ﻭﺃﺭﺯﻕ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻨﻴﻦ.ﻓﺄﻋﻄﺘﻪ ﺑﻠﻬﺔ ﺟﺎﺭﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﺯﻭﺟﺔ.ﻓﺪﺧﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ
ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺏ )(SVD
Dn:5:3ﻭﺇﺫ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻠﺸﺎﺻﺮ ﻳﺬﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺨﻤﺮ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺑﺈﺣﻀﺎﺭ ﺁﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻀﺔ
ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺃﺧﺮﺟﻬﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺧﺬﻧﺎﺻّﺮ ﺃﺑﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻭﺭﺷﻠﻴﻢ ﻟﻴﺸﺮﺏ ﺑﻬﺎ
ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎﺅﻩ ﻭﺯﻭﺟﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﺳﺮﺍﺭﻳﻪ،،(SVD) .
ﻫﻞ ﺗﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﻬﺆﻻء ﻛﺎﻧﺒﻴﺎء؟
ﺏ ﻟِ َﻢ ﺗَ ْﻠﺒِﺴ َ
ُﻮﻥ ﻭﻥ .ﻳَﺎ ﺃَ ْﻫ َﻞ ْﺍﻟ ِﻜﺘَﺎ ِ
ﷲِ َﻭﺃَ ْﻧﺘُ ْﻢ ﺗَ ْﺸﻬَ ُﺪ َ
ﺕ ﱠ ُﻭﻥ ﺑِﺂَﻳَﺎ ِ ﻳَﺎ ﺃَ ْﻫ َﻞ ْﺍﻟ ِﻜﺘَﺎ ِ
ﺏ ﻟِ َﻢ ﺗَ ْﻜﻔُﺮ َ
ﻖ َﻭﺃَ ْﻧﺘُ ْﻢ ﺗَ ْﻌﻠَ ُﻤ َ
ﻮﻥ. ﻮﻥ ْﺍﻟ َﺤ ﱠ ﻖ ﺑِ ْﺎﻟﺒَ ِ
ﺎﻁ ِﻞ َﻭﺗَ ْﻜﺘُ ُﻤ َ ْﺍﻟ َﺤ ﱠ
ﻨﺖ ﺑِ ْﺪﻋﺎ ً ﱢﻣ ْﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﱡ ﺳ ُِﻞ ( ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﻲ ﻗﻮﻝ ﷲ ﻟﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ )ﻗُﻞْ َﻣﺎ ُﻛ ُ
ﺳﻼً ﱢﻣﻦ ﻗَ ْﺒﻠِ َﻚ َﻭ َﺟ َﻌ ْﻠﻨَﺎ ﻟَ ُﻬ ْﻢ ﺃَ ْﺯ َﻭﺍﺟﺎ ً َﻭ ُﺫ ﱢﺭﻳﱠﺔً َﻭ َﻣﺎ َﻛ َ
ﺎﻥ ﺳ ْﻠﻨَﺎ ُﺭ ُ ﻭﻗﻮﻝ ﷲ ) َﻭﻟَﻘَ ْﺪ ﺃَ ْﺭ َ
ﷲِ ﻟِ ُﻜ ﱢﻞ ﺃَ َﺟ ٍﻞ ِﻛﺘَﺎﺏٌ )ﺍﻟﺮﻋﺪ ( 38 : ُﻮﻝ ﺃَﻥ ﻳَﺄْﺗِ َﻲ ﺑِﺂﻳَ ٍﺔ ﺇِﻻﱠ ﺑِﺈ ِ ْﺫ ِﻥ ّ
ﻟِ َﺮﺳ ٍ
ﻓﻬﻞ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﷲ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﻟﻠﺰﻧﺎ ﻁﺎﻟﻤﺎ ﺟﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻌﺪﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﺎﺕ ﻫﺆﻻء ﻗﺪﻭﺗﻨﺎ ﻭﺃﻧﺖ
ﺗﻌﺘﺒﺮﻫﻢ ﺯﻧﺎﺓ؟!
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻁﻌﻨﺖ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﻭﻗﻠﺖ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﻮﻩ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺯﻧﺎ ..ﻷﻥ ﷲ
ﺧﻠﻖ ﻵﺩﻡ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ..ﺇﻟﺦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﺎﺗﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻧﻬﺎ ..ﺇﺫﻥ ﻓﺈﺭﻣﻲ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﻗﻤﺎﻣﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺮﺓ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺘﺒﺔ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ..ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻥ ﺗﺴﻤﻮﻩ ﺇﺳﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻴﻖ ﺑﻜﺘﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺪﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻁﻼﻕ ﻟﻔﻆ
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺍﺳﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻦ ﻟﻔﻈﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎ ﻟﺮﺃﻳﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻌﺪﺩ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء!!..
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻓﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﻔﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎ ..ﺇﺫﺍ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﻜﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ؟
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﺨﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺛﺎﺭﻩ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﻞ "ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺗﺰﻭﺝ ﻁﻔﻠﺔ" ﺣﻮﻝ
ﺯﻭﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺗﺴﻊ ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ ...ﻭﻧﺤﻦ ﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺗﻔﻨﻴﺪ
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺳﺄﺭﺩ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺎ…ﻓﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺎﻏﻭ ،ﻧﻳﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﻭﺍ – ﻗﺎﻟﺕ ﻣﻧﻅﻣﺔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺑﻧﺕ
ﻧﻳﻛﺎﺭﺍﻏﻭﻳﺔ ﺑﻌﻣﺭ 9ﺳﻧﻭﺍﺕ ﺣﺑﻠﻰ ﺇﺳﺗﻠﻣﺕ ﺍﻹﺟﻬﺎﺽ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺧﺎﺻّﺔ
http://www.elsalvador.com/noticias/2003/04/04/naci
onal/nacio23.html
ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﻟﻘﺎء ﻣﻊ ﺃﺣﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻁﺑﻳﺑﺎﺕ ﺣﻭﻝ ﺑﻠﻭﻍ ﺍﻟﻧﺳﺎء ﻭﻋﻼﻣﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﻣﺗﻰ ﻫﻭ:
http://www.boswtol.com/washwasha/wednak_75
_02.html
ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻬﺟﻭﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺳﻳﺩﺓ ﻋﺎﺋﺷﺔ ﺭﺿﻰ ﷲ ﻋﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺭﺳﻭﻝ ﻏﻴﺮ
ﻣﺒﺮﺭ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ
ﺸﺔَ ﻓِﻲ َﻋ ْﻴ ِﻦ ﺃَ ِﺧﻴﻚََ ،ﻭﻟ ِﻜﻨﱠ َﻚ ﻻَ ﺗَﺘَﻨَﺒﱠﻪُ ﺇِﻟَﻰ ﺍ ْﻟ َﺨ َ
ﺸﺒَ ِﺔ ﺍ ْﻟ َﻜﺒِﻴ َﺮ ِﺓ ﻓِﻲ َﻭﻟِ َﻤﺎ َﺫﺍ ﺗُﻼَ ِﺣﻆُ ﺍ ْﻟﻘَ ﱠ
ﺸﺔَ ﺍﻟﱠﺘِﻲ ﻓِﻲ ﻒ ﺗَ ْﻘ ِﺪ ُﺭ ﺃَﻥْ ﺗَﻘُﻮ َﻝ ﻷَ ِﺧﻴ َﻚ :ﻳَﺎﺃَ ِﺧﻲَ ،ﺩ ْﻋﻨِﻲ ﺃُ ْﺧ ِﺮ ِ
ﺝ ﺍ ْﻟﻘَ ﱠ َﻋ ْﻴﻨِ َﻚ؟ ﺃَ ْﻭ َﻛ ْﻴ َ
ﺸﺒَﺔَ ﺍﻟﱠﺘِﻲ ﻓﻲ َﻋ ْﻴﻨِ َﻚ ﺃَ ْﻧﺖَ .ﻳَﺎ ُﻣ َﺮﺍﺋِﻲ ،ﺃَ ْﺧ ِﺮ ْﺝ ﺃَ ﱠﻭﻻً ﻼﺣﻆُ ﺍ ْﻟ َﺨ َ َﻋ ْﻴﻨِ َﻚ! ﻭﺃَ ْﻧﺖَ ﻻَ ﺗُ ِ
ﺸﺔَ ﺍﻟﱠﺘِﻲ ﻓِﻲ َﻋ ْﻴ ِﻦ ﺃَ ِﺧﻴ َﻚ. ﺸﺒَﺔَ ِﻣﻦْ َﻋ ْﻴﻨِﻚََ ،ﻭ ِﻋ ْﻨ َﺪﺋِ ٍﺬ ﺗُ ْﺒ ِ
ﺼ ُﺮ َﺟﻴﱢﺪﺍً ﻟِﺘُ ْﺨ ِﺮ َﺝ ﺍ ْﻟﻘَ ﱠ ﺍ ْﻟ َﺨ َ
ﻟُﻮﻗَ ﺎ 42 - 41 : 6
ﻭﺃﻋﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺹ )) 2ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﻗﺪﻭﺓ ﻟﻤﻦ ﻳﺪﻋﻮﻫﻢ
ﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺜﺮﻫﻢ" :ﻧﻌﻄﻴﻜﻢ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﻗﺪﻭﺓ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﺎ" ) 2ﺗﺲ(( (9 :3
ﻭﺃﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻙ ﻓﻰ ﻛﺗﺎﺏ ﻳﺄﻣﺭ ﺑﺫﺑﺢ ﺍﻷﻁﻔﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺫﻛﻭﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻹﺳﺗﻣﺗﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﻁﻔﺎﻝ
ﺍﻹﻧﺎﺙ ؟
ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﻛﺗﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺩﺱ ﺳﻔﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﺩ 18 - 15 : 31
)) ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻬﻡ ﻣﻭﺳﻰ ﻫﻝ ﺍﺑﻘﻳﺗﻡ ﻛﻝ ﺍﻧﺛﻰ ﺣﻳّﺔ ... .ﻓﺎﻵﻥ ﺍﻗﺗﻠﻭﺍ ﻛﻝ ﺫﻛﺭ ﻣﻥ
ﺍﻻﻁﻔﺎﻝ .ﻭﻛﻝ ﺍﻣﺭﺃﺓ ﻋﺭﻓﺕ ﺭﺟﻼ ﺑﻣﺿﺎﺟﻌﺔ ﺫﻛﺭ ﺍﻗﺗﻠﻭﻫﺎ .ﻟﻛﻥ ﺟﻣﻳﻊ
ﺍﻻﻁﻔﺎﻝ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻧﺳﺎء ﺍﻟﻠﻭﺍﺗﻲ ﻟﻡ ﻳﻌﺭﻓﻥ ﻣﺿﺎﺟﻌﺔ ﺫﻛﺭ ﺍﺑﻘﻭﻫﻥّ ﻟﻛﻡ ﺣﻳّﺎﺕ ((
ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
Nm:31:18ﻟﻛﻥ ﺟﻣﻳﻊ ﺍﻻﻁﻔﺎﻝ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻧﺳﺎء ﺍﻟﻠﻭﺍﺗﻲ ﻟﻡ ﻳﻌﺭﻓﻥ ﻣﺿﺎﺟﻌﺔ
ﺫﻛﺭ ﺍﺑﻘﻭﻫﻥّ ﻟﻛﻡ ﺣ ّﻳﺎﺕ(SVD) .
ﻭﺃﻋﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺹ )) 2ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﻗﺪﻭﺓ ﻟﻤﻦ ﻳﺪﻋﻮﻫﻢ
ﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺜﺮﻫﻢ" :ﻧﻌﻄﻴﻜﻢ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﻗﺪﻭﺓ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﺘﻤﺜﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﺎ" ) 2ﺗﺲ(( (9 :3
ﻭﺃﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﻟﻮ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺗﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻋﻦ ﻓﺎﺭﻕ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﻛﻢ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮ
ﺭﺑﻜﻢ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺣﺒﻠﺖ ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ؟!!
ﻫﻝ ﺗﻌﻠﻡ ﻛﻡ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻣﺭ ﻣﺭﻳﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺩﻳﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﻰ ﺗﺭﻛﻌﻭﻥ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﺻﻧﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺻﻭﺭﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺗﺳﺄﻟﻭﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺳﺗﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻓﻳﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺳﻣﺎﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺭﺯﻕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺷﻔﺎﻋﺔﻣﻥ ﺩﻭﻥ ﷲ ،ﻓﻬﻝ
ﺗﻌﻠﻣﻭﻥ ﻛﻡ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻣﺭﻫﺎ ﺣﻳﻥ ﺗﺯﻭﺟﺕ ﻣﻥ ﻳﻭﺳﻑ ﺍﻟﻧﺟﺎﺭ؟ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻫﻠﺔ
ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺕ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻳﺔ ﻋﺳﺭﺓ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻭﺳﻑ ﻗﺩ ﺗﺟﺎﻭﺯ ﺍﻟﺗﺳﻌﻳﻥ ﻣﻥ ﻋﻣﺭﻩ
ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻛﻼﻡ ﻣﻭﺛﻕ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﻭﺳﻭﻋﺔ..ﺳﻧﺔ77ﻳﻌﻧﻲ ﺃﻛﺑﺭ ﻣﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺣﻭﺍﻟﻰ
...ﺍﻟﻛﺎﺛﻭﻟﻳﻛﻳﺔ
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08504a.htm
" a respectable man to espouse Mary, then
twelve to fourteen years of age, Joseph, who
was at the time ninety years old "
http://www.cin.org/users/james/files/key2mary.h
tm
" Virgin Mary Delivers jesus Pbuh @ the age of
12 "
ﻣﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﺧﺭﻯ ﺗﺅﻛﺩ ﻫﺫﺍ
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08504a.htm
http://www.crisismagazine.com/april2002/feature3.htm
ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﺯﻭﺝ ﻣﺮﻳﻢ
http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/encyc/encyc06/htm/iii.lvii.c
xxii.htm
ﻭﺃﻅﻧﻛﻡ ﺳﻣﻌﺗﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺳﻳﺱ ﻳﻘﻭﻝ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺕ ﺻﻐﻳﺭﺓ ﺟﺩﺍ ﻋﻧﺩﻣﺎ ﺣﺑﻠﺕ ﻻ ﺗﺩﺭﻱ
! ﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﻌﻝ
ﻭﺑﺎﻹﻧﺰﺍﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻜﻢ ﻓﻤﺮﻳﻢ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺃﻏﺘﺼﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺱ "ﺍﻹﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ"
ﺛﻢ ﺟﺎء ﺍﻹﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﺮﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺛﺪﻳﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺑﻨﺖ 12ﺳﻨﺔ ...ﻓﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺑﻮﺻﻒ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ؟!!
ﺃﻧﻪ –ﺣﺴﺐ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ -ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ ﻟﻺﻏﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻵﻟﻬﺔ ﻟﻬﺬﻩ -ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻠﺔ -ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻜﻴﻨﺔ
ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻻ ﺗﺪﺭﻱ ﺍﻥ ﺍﻵﻟﻬﺔ ﺃﺣﺒﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺧﺎﻟﻘﻬﺎ ﻳﺮﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺛﺪﻳﻴﻬﺎ !!
ﻗﺼﺔ ﻣﻜﺬﻭﺑﺔ ﺑﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﻭﻳﺒﻨﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻓﺼﻼ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻳﺤﻜﻲ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﻗﺼﺼﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ !!
ﺃﺭﺃﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺴﺎﻁﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ...ﺭﺟﻞ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺇﻻ ﺑﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻜﺬﻭﺏ ﻭﻳﺒﻨﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻛﺘﺒﺎ ﻭﻓﺼﻮﻻ ....؟!!
ﺻﺪﻕ ﷲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ :
َﻭﻗَ ِﺪ ْﻣﻨَﺎ ﺇِﻟَﻰ َﻣﺎ َﻋ ِﻤﻠُﻮﺍ ِﻣﻦْ َﻋ َﻤ ٍﻞ ﻓَ َﺠ َﻌ ْﻠﻨَﺎﻩُ َﻫﺒَﺎء ﱠﻣﻨﺜُﻮﺭﺍً )ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺎﻥ ( 23 :
ﻭﺃﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﻷﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ ..ﻭﻟﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ..ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﻟﺪ ﺗﺤﺖ
ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻓﺤﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ..ﻭﺇﻥ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺊ ﻓﻴﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻧﺒﻴﺎ ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺜﺔ ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﺴﺠﻠﺔ 24ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﻳﻮﻣﻴﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺮﻳﺔ
ﻟﺤﻤﺪ ہﻠﻟ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺪﺳﻮﺱ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺬﻭﺏ !!
ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻹﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺯﻋﻤﻬﻢ ﻟﻤﺎ ﻧﺰﻝ ﻟﻸﺭﺽ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻬﺘﻢ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﻜﺘﺒﻮﺍ ﺇﻻ ﻧﺒﺄ
ﻭﻻﺩﺗﻪ ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻫﺮﻭﺑﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻣﺼﺮ ﺛﻢ ﻳﺘﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻬﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺷﺊ
ﻋﻦ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺳﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﻴﻦ ؟!
ﻓﺄﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ؟ ﻭﻫﻞ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺤﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻫﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﺟﺪﻭﻩ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ؟ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻹﻟﻪ؟
3ﺃﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻣﻨﺬ ﻭﻻﺩﺗﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ 12ﺳﻨﺔ ...ﺛﻢ ﺳﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﻴﻦ ؟! ﺛﻢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺣﺪﺍﺙ
ﺧﻼﻝ ﺛﻼﺙ ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ !!
ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻴﻦ ؟!
ﺃﻛﺮﺭ ...ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻌﻠﻤﻪ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﻫﻮ ﻓﺘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﻴﺮﺓ ﻓﻘﻂ...ﻓﻤﻦ
ﺃﻳﻦ ﺃﻋﺮﻑ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻪ ﺇﻥ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻪ ﺑﺪﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ
ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺺ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﻏﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﻄﻮﺭﻳﺔ ﻛﻘﺼﺔ ﺷﻤﺸﻮﻥ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﻨﺴﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﺤﺔ ﻛﻨﺸﻴﺪ ﺍﻹﻧﺸﺎﺩ ﻭ) ﺣﺰﻗﻴﺎﻝ ( 23ﻭ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﺪﻳﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻯ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﺳﻼﻣﺎﺕ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﻷﺻﺪﻗﺎﺋﻪ ﻭﺻﺪﻳﻘﺎﺗﻪ ﻓﻲ )ﺭﻭﻣﻴﺔ (16ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﺎﺏ
ﻭﻓﻼﻥ ﺗﺰﻭﺝ ﻋﻼﻧﺔ ﻭﺃﻧﺠﺒﺎ ﻓﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻓﻬﻤﺎﻧﺔ ﻛﻤﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﺎﺭ.
ﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻬﺮﺍء ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺤﺘﻮﻳﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺃﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻗﺼﺔ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ
ﺑﺘﻔﺎﺻﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺃﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻡ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺸﺮﻓﺔ ؟
ﻻ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ )ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ( ﻋﻦ ﻁﻔﻮﻟﺔ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﻩ ﻭﺃﻣﻪ ﻭﺃﺑﻮﻩ
ﻳﺒﺤﺜﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﻪ
Lk:2:48ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﺑﺼﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﻫﺸﺎ.ﻭﻗﺎﻟﺖ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻨ ّﻲ ﻟﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻓﻌﻠﺖ ﺑﻨﺎ
ﻫﻜﺬﺍ.ﻫﻮﺫﺍ ﺍﺑﻮﻙ )ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ( ﻭﺍﻧﺎ ﻛﻨﺎ ﻧﻄﻠﺒﻚ ﻣﻌﺬﺑﻴﻦ.
ﻓﻴﺠﺪﻭﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﻜﻞ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﻟﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺓ ﻁﺎﻟﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ
ﻣﻦ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻬﻤﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺍﻷﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﻗﻂ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ
ﺃﻧﻪ ﻧﺒﻲ ﻛﺎﺫﺏ ،ﺑﻼ ﺃﺩﻧﻰ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻁﺒﻘﻮﺍ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺋﻬﻢ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻟﻬﻬﻢ ﻷﺻﺒﺢ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻛﺎﺫﺏ...ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻞ ﺑﻤﻜﻴﺎﻟﻴﻦ.
ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﻟﺪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﻧﻘﻠﺖ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ
ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺻﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ..ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺻﺪﻕ ﻟﻠﻨﺒﻮﺓ
..ﻓﻴﺴﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻬﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻬﻮﻳﺔ ..ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻬﻮﻝ ﻁﻔﻮﻟﺘﻪ ﻭﺷﺒﺎﺑﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﻫﻼ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﺭﻥ
ﺑﻤﻦ ﻭﻟﺪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﻋﺎﺵ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﻭﺟﺎﺗﻪ
ﻳﻨﻘﻠﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﻈﻞ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ...ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ !!
ﻭﻫﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ ﺃﺗﺤﺪﺍﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﻝ 55ﺯﻭﺟﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺒﻲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ
ﺍﻝ 21ﺯﻭﺟﺔ ...ﺑﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ .....ﺃﻧﺘﻈﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﺟﻼ ﻭﻳﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ !
ﻭﺣﺘﻰ ﻟﻮ ﻓﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﺟﺪﻻ ﺃﻧﻬﻢ 100ﻭﻟﻴﺴﻮﺍ 55ﻓﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ..ﺃﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺘﻚ ؟
ﻭﺃﺗﻮﻗﻊ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺨﺮﺝ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺩ ﺳﺨﻴﻒ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺿﺪﻩ
"ﺃ.ﻋﻼء ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ" ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺏ"ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻹﻳﻤﺎﻥ" ﻭﻏﻴﺮﻫﺎ !
ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺠﺞ ﺑﺄﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﻪ … ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻤﺆﺩﺏ ..ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺤﺠﺔ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ !!
ﻭﻫﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺗﺤﺪﺍﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺮﻫﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﺑﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻛﺮﻳﻢ ﺃﻭﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺃﺳﺘﺪﻝ
ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺈﻧﺠﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﺑﺎ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻨﻮﺻﻴﻴﻦ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﻬﺮﺍﻁﻘﺔ !!
ﺃﻧﺘﻈﺮ ﺭﺩﻩ ﻭﻗﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺳﺘﻀﻐﻂ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﺤﻪ ﻭﺟﻤﺎﻫﻴﺮﻩ ﻟﻴﺮﺩ ﺭﺩﺍ ﺧﺎﺋﺒﺎ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺎ
ﺃﻭ ﻳﺴﻜﺖ ﻭﻳﺒﻴﻦ ﻋﺠﺰﻩ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺤﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻪ !!!
ﻭﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺮﻋﻮﺍ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺒﻌﺜﻮﺍ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺘﺄﻛﺪﻭﺍ ﺑﺄﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺠﺰﻩ ﺃﻭ
ﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﻴﻒ !!
ﻭﺻﺪﻕ ﷲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ:
ﺴﺘ َِﺠﻴﺒُﻮ ْﺍ ﻟَ ُﻜ ْﻢ ﻓَﺎ ْﻋﻠَ ُﻤﻮ ْﺍ ﺃَﻧﱠ َﻤﺎ ﺃُﻧ ِﺰ ِﻝ ﺑِ ِﻌ ْﻠ ِﻢ ّ
ﷲِ َﻭﺃَﻥ ﻻﱠ ﺇِﻟَـﻪَ ﺇِﻻﱠ ُﻫ َﻮ ﻓَ َﻬ ْﻞ ﺃَﻧﺘُﻢ ﻓَﺈِﻥ ﻟﱠ ْﻢ ﻳَ ْ
ﻮﻥ )ﻫﻮﺩ ( 14 :؟ ﺴﻠِ ُﻤ َ ﱡﻣ ْ
-7 -
ﺃﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ "ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ"
ﷲُ ﺃَ ْﻋﻠَ ُﻢ ﺑِ َﻤﺎ ﻳُﻨَ ﱢﺰ ُﻝ ﻗَﺎﻟُﻮ ْﺍ ﺇِﻧﱠ َﻤﺎ ﺃَﻧﺖَ ُﻣ ْﻔﺘَ ٍﺮ ﺑَ ْﻞ ﺃَ ْﻛﺜَ ُﺮ ُﻫ ْﻢ َﻭﺇِ َﺫﺍ ﺑَ ﱠﺪ ْﻟﻨَﺎ ﺁﻳَﺔً ﱠﻣ َﻜ َ
ﺎﻥ ﺁﻳَ ٍﺔ َﻭ ّ
ﻳﻦ ﺁ َﻣﻨُﻮ ْﺍ َﻭ ُﻫ ًﺪﻯ ﻖ ﻟِﻴُﺜَﺒﱢﺖَ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َﺱ ِﻣﻦ ﱠﺭﺑﱢ َﻚ ﺑِﺎ ْﻟ َﺤ ﱢ ﻭﺡ ﺍ ْﻟﻘُ ُﺪ ِ ﻮﻥ * ﻗُ ْﻞ ﻧَ ﱠﺰﻟَﻪُ ُﺭ ُﻻَ ﻳَ ْﻌﻠَ ُﻤ َ
ﻴﻦ )ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ ( 102 : ﺴﻠِ ِﻤ َ ﺸ َﺮﻯ ﻟِ ْﻠ ُﻤ َْﻭﺑُ ْ
ﺤﻤﺪ ہﻠﻟ ﻭﻛﻔﻰ ﻭﺻﻼﺓ ﻭﺳﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺇﺻﻄﻔﻰ ﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ
ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ:
ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻳﺒﺚ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺳﻤﻮﻣﻪ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﻭﻳﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺑﺠﺎﺣﺔ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﺑﻞ ﺃﻗﺮ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ –ﺇﻥ
ﺻﺢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺗﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺮﺍﻧﻴﻦ -ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﺴﺦ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ..ﻭﺑﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻝ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻁﻼﻕ ﻭﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﺮﺩﺩﻭﻥ
ﻛﺎﻟﺒﻐﺒﻐﺎﻭﺍﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻘﻨﻪ ﻟﻬﻢ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺴﻴﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﻨﺎﺋﺲ ﺍﻟﺠﻬﻼء!!
ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﻮﺩﻧﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺳﻴﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻊ ﺭﺩ
ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻟﻴﻌﺮﻑ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻲ ﻳﻔﺘﺨﺮ ﺑﺄﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻨﻌﻖ ﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ
ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﻳﻨﻘﻞ ﻧﻘﻮﻻﺕ ﻣﺒﺘﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻳﺤﺠﺐ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﻭﻳﺨﺘﺮﻉ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻪ ﻣﻜﺬﻭﺑﺔ ﻓﻴﺒﻨﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﺘﺒﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻭﻓﺼﻮﻻ
ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﺛﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻭﻗﻮﻋﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺣﻴﻦ ﻧﻔﻀﺢ ﺃﻛﺎﺫﻳﺒﻪ ﻭﺳﻴﺘﺮﻙ ﺩﻳﻦ
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺤﻴﺔ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﺼﻒ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻌﺮﻑ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺗﻬﺪﻣﺖ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺒﻪ ﻛﺨﻴﻮﻁ
ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻜﺒﻮﺕ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺠﺪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ ﻭﺍﻹﻓﺘﺮﺍء ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻋﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﻁﻠﻬﻢ !!
ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﻣﻨﻜﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻧﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻓﺈﻧﻲ
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﻪ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ "ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺊ ﻓﺮﻉ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻩ"
ﻭﻛﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻧﻲ ﻟﻮ ﺩﻋﻴﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺎء ﺭﺟﻼ ﺇﻧﺠﻠﻴﺰﻳﺎ ﻭﺃﺧﺮ ﻓﺮﻧﺴﻴﺎ
ﻭﺃﺧﺮ ﻫﻨﺪﻳﺎ ﻭﺃﺧﺮ ﻋﺮﺑﻴﺎ ﻭﺳﺄﻟﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﻞ ﺑﻠﻐﺘﻪ "ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﺗﺄﻛﻞ؟" ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺃﻛﻞ
ﺟﺒﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻹﻧﺠﻠﻴﺰﻳﺔ) ( cheeseﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻧﺴﻲ "ﺟﺒﻨﺎ" ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻬﻨﺪﻱ
"ﺳﺄﻛﻞ ﺟﺒﻦ" ﺑﻠﻐﺘﻪ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ "ﺃﻛﻞ ﺟﺒﻦ" ﺛﻢ ﺇﺭﺗﻔﻌﺖ ﺃﺻﻮﺍﺗﻬﻢ
ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﺼﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺇﺧﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﺄﻛﻞ ﺟﺒﻨﺎ ﻭﻳﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻷﻧﻬﻢ
ﻻ ﻳﻔﻬﻤﻮﻥ ﻟﻐﺎﺕ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ...ﻓﻬﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ؟
ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻻ..ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻪ ﺗﺮﻣﺰ ﻟﺸﺊ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ !!
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻨﺎ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻪ ﺗﺮﻣﺰ ﻟﺸﺊ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ...ﻓﺴﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
"ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ " ﺃﻱ ﺃﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ !
ﻓﻬﻢ ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻧﻪ "ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﻭﺻﻴﺔ ﺑﺄﺧﺮﻯ" ﻭﻧﺤﻦ ﻧﺴﻤﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻧﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﺃﻱ
"ﻧﺴﺦ ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ" !
ﻗﺪ ﻳﺼﺮ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻨﻲ ﺃﻓﺴﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺮﺃﻳﻲ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﺑﻪ ..ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ
ﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ "ﻧﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ" ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺤﻴﻴﻦ
ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﺑﻞ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻟﻠﻜﺎﺛﻮﻟﻴﻚ!
ﻓﻬﻞ ﻳﺤﻖ ﻟﺒﻄﺮﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻭﻳﻜﺘﺐ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻟﻴﻨﻜﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺃﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﻮﻻﻩ ﻟﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﻬﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﻤﺎ ﻧﺴﺦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ؟!
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺹ 4ﻛﻌﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻘﻠﻪ –ﺍﻟﺤﺮﻓﻲ2 )) -ـ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻔﻲ )ﺍﻟﺠﺰء
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺹ (116ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺪﻳﻞ ،ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎء ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ((.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻔﻲ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻔﻈﺎ ﻭﻣﻀﻤﻮﻧﺎ:
))} َﻣﺎ ﻧَﻨ َﺴ ْﺦ ِﻣ ْﻦ ءﺍﻳَ ٍﺔ ﺃَ ْﻭ ﻧُ ِ
ﻨﺴﻬَﺎ { ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻟﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺪﻳﻞ ،ﻭﺷﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎء ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻘﺮﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻭﻫﺎﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺧﻲ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻼً ﻓﻲ ﺣﻘﻨﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎ ً ﻣﺤﻀﺎ ً ﻓﻲ ﺣﻖ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻉ ((.
ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ !
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ "ﺃﻧﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ" ﺛﻢ ﻧﺴﺦ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻟﻬﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ "ﺃﻧﺎ ﺛﺎﻟﻮﺙ ﻭﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻗﺎﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﺠﻠﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻳﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ" ﻣﺮﻋﺎﺓ ﻟﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﺒﻴﺪﻩ –ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻘﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ..-ﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﺇﻟﻰ
ﺍﻟﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ..ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺭﺍﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﺍﻑ ﺛﻢ ﻳﻨﺴﺦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻲ ﺭﺅﻳﺎ ﻳﻮﺣﻨﺎ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ !!
ﺑﻞ ﷲ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ
Nm:23:19ﻟﻴﺲ ﷲ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﺬﺏ.ﻭﻻ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻨﺪﻡ(SVD) .
"ﻟﻴﺲ ﷲ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ..ﻭﻻ ﺇﺑﻦ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ" ﺛﻢ ﻳﻨﺴﺦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﻟﻘﺐ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻫﻮ ﷲ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ "ﺇﺑﻦ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ"
ﻭﻳﻨﺴﺦ "ﻟﻴﺲ ﷲ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ" ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ "ﺃﻧﺎ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻛﻠﻤﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﺳﻤﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﷲ" )ﻳﻮ (40 : 8
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺋﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺟﺎﺋﺰ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻖ ﷲ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﺨﺒﺮﻳﻦ
ﻓﺒﺎﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺬﺏ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﻤﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺠﻮﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻖ ﷲ !
ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ..ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻻ ﻳﺠﻮﺯ ﻋﻘﻼ ﻭﻻ ﻧﻘﻼ ﺑﻞ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎ
ﺻﺮﻳﺤﺎ !!
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻓﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﻓﺎﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﻼﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺮﺍﻡ ﻓﻘﻂ ..ﺇﻓﻌﻞ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ!!
ﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻟﻔﻈﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻓﻲ ﻋﺒﺮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺇﺻﺤﺎﺡ 7
ﺴﺎﺑِﻘَﺔُ ﺴ َﺨ ِ
ﺖ ﺍﻟ َﻮ ِ
ﺻﻴﱠﺔُ ﺍﻟ ﱠ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺛﻮﻟﻴﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﻮﻋﻴﺔ )) 18ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻧُ ِ
ﻟِﻀُﻌﻔِﻬﺎ ﻭﻗِﻠﱠ ِﺔ ﻓﺎﺋِ َﺪﺗِﻬﺎ19 ،ﻓﺎﻟ ﱠﺸﺮﻳ َﻌﺔُ ﻟﻢ ﺗُﺒِﻠ ْﻎ َﺷﻴﺌًﺎ ﺇِﻟﻰ ﺍﻟ َﻜﻤﺎﻝ((،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻗﻔﺎﺕ ﻓﻌﻨﺪﻧﺎ ..ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻛﻞ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ
ﻓﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻪ –ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺯﻳﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﺭ.. -ﻭﻻ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺎ
ﻭﻋﺪﻳﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﻏﻴﺮ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺪﻟﻪ ﷲ ﺑﻐﻴﺮﻩ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﺗﺐ
ﻋﺒﺮﺍﻧﻴﻴﻦ ﻳﺘﻬﻢ ﷲ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻘﺺ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻴﺐ ...ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺒﺮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺑﺸﺮﻱ
ﻣﺤﺾ ﺑﻞ ﻛﻔﺮﻱ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ!!
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺟﺰﺍء ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﻭﺃﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺃﺟﻤﻌﻴﻦ ﻓﻤﻦ ﻳﺴﺐ ﷲ ﻭﻳﺠﺪﻑ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻗﺎﺋﻼ ﺍﻥ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻌﻴﺐ ﻭﻧﺎﻗﺺ ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﺮﺟﻢ ﻭﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﻭﻳﺼﻴﺮ
ﻣﻠﻌﻮﻧﺎ!
Dt:28:13ﺍﺫﺍ ﺳﻤﻌﺖ ﻟﻮﺻﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻬﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﻧﺎ ﺍﻭﺻﻴﻚ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻟﺘﺤﻔﻆ
ﻭﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺰﻳﻎ ﻋﻦ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﻧﺎ ﺍﻭﺻﻴﻚ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻳﻤﻴﻨﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺷﻤﺎﻻ
ﻟﻜﻲ ﺗﺬﻫﺐ ﻭﺭﺍء ﺁﻟﻬﺔ ﺍﺧﺮﻯ ﻟﺘﻌﺒﺪﻫﺎ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻥ ﻟﻢ ﺗﺴﻤﻊ ﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻬﻚ
ﻟﺘﺤﺮﺹ ﺍﻥ ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﻭﺻﺎﻳﺎﻩ ﻭﻓﺮﺍﺋﻀﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﻧﺎ ﺍﻭﺻﻴﻚ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺗﺎﺗﻲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﻨﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﺪﺭﻛﻚ ﻣﻠﻌﻮﻧﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﻭﻣﻠﻌﻮﻧﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻞ...ﻣﻠﻌﻮﻧﺎ...ﻣﻠﻌﻮﻧﺎ...ﻣﻠﻌﻮﻧﺎ.....ﺇﺻﺤﺎﺣﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻌﻨﻪ 58 ..ﺍﻥ
ﻟﻢ ﺗﺤﺮﺹ ﻟﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻣﻮﺱ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺮ ﻟﺘﻬﺎﺏ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺠﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻫﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻬﻚ )(SVD
ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺼﺮﺡ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻴﺐ ﻭﻟﻢ
ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻓﻴﺼﺮﺡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﻓﻖ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﺎﻗﺾ
ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻭﻳﺮﺟﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ.
Heb:6:1ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻧﺤﻦ ﺗﺎﺭﻛﻮﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺑﺪﺍءﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻟﻨﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﻏﻴﺮ
ﺿﻌﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﻴﺘﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎہﻠﻟ )(SVD
ﺃﻱ ﻋﺘﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ..ﻟﻴﺄﺗﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻟﺲ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﻴﺮ ﻟﻴﺘﺮﻙ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻣﺪﻋﻴﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ...ﺃﻱ ﻫﺮﺍء ﻫﺬﺍ ؟
ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺗﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺃﺳﻒ ..ﻛﻴﻒ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺗﺼﺪﻗﻮﻥ ﺭﺟﻼ ﻛﺒﻮﻟﺲ ﺑﻞ ﺗﻌﺘﺒﺮﻭﻥ
ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﻛﻼﻡ ﷲ ..ﻛﻴﻒ ﺫﻟﻚ..ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺘﺮﺽ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﺬﻓﻮﺍ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻟﺘﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻪ "ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﺒﻴﺎ" )ﻟﻮ (19 : 24؟!
ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﻳﺪﻋﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻧﺴﺦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻭﻭﺟﺐ ﺗﺮﻙ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ......ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ!!
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺃﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ﺹ )) 7ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ" :ﻣﻦ ﺃﺧﻄﺄ
ﻓﻲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﺮﻯ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻣﺠﺮﻣﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ" )ﻣﺖ((. (19 :5
ﻓﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﻤﻦ ﺃﺧﻄﺊ ﻓﻲ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻠﻪ ؟!
ﺑﻞ ﻭﺇﺗﻬﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﻭﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﻌﻴﺐ ﻭﻋﺪﻳﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ؟!
ﺑﻞ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻳﺮﺟﻮ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻠﻮ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ؟!
ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺼﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ !!
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﻓﻲ ﻟﻔﻈﺔ "ﻧﻨﺴﻬﺎ " ﻓﻲ ﻗﻮﻝ ﷲ "ﻣﺎ ﻧﻨﺴﺦ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻧﻨﺴﻬﺎ
ﻧﺄﺕ ﺑﺨﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ" ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﻭﻋﺎﺩ ﻭﺯﺍﺩ !
ﻭﻛﺄﻧﻤﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﺋﻊ ﻧﺼﻔﻪ ؟!
ﻋﺪﺩ 21ﻋﺪﺩ :14ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺣﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﻫﺐ ﻓﻲ ﺳﻮﻓﻪ ﻭﺃﻭﺩﻳﺔ
ﺍﺭﻧﻮﻥ )(SVD
ﻳﺸﻮﻉ 10ﻋﺪﺩ :13ﻓﺪﺍﻣﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﻭﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺋﻪ.ﺃﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻳﺎﺷﺮ.ﻓﻮﻗﻔﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﻭﻟﻢ
ﺗﻌﺠﻞ ﻟﻠﻐﺮﻭﺏ ﻧﺤﻮ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ(SVD) .
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻗﺎﻣﻮﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻴﺎء ﺛﻢ ﺍﻹﺳﻢ ﻳﺎﺷﺮ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ :
ﺍﺳﻢ ﻋﺒﺮﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ )) ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ (( ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻛﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺼﺮﻭﻥ ) 1ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ :2
.( 18ﺳﻔﺮ ﻳﺎﺷﺮ ) ﺳﻔﺮ ﻫﻴﺎﺷﺎﺭ (:
ﻳﻠﻮﺡ ﻟﻠﻤﺘﻌﻤﻖ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺮﻧﻴﻤﺔ ﻳﺸﻮﻉ ) ﻳﺶ ،( 13 :10ﻭﻣﺮﺛﺎﺓ
ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﻟﺸﺎﻭﻝ ﻭﻳﻮﻧﺎﺛﺎﻥ ) 2ﺻﻢ ،( 27 -18 :1ﻣﻘﺘﺒﺴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺮ
ﺍﻟﻤﻔﻘﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﺮﺑﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺪﺷﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﻜﻞ ) 1ﻣﻞ 12 :8ﺍﻟﺦ.
ﻭﻧﺸﻴﺪ ﺩﺑﻮﺭﺓ ) ﻗﺾ ( 5ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ً .ﻭﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺮ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻗﺼﺎﺋﺪ ،ﻗُﺪﻡ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺪﻳﺒﺎﺟﺔ ﻧﺜﺮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺗﺨﻠﻠﺘﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﻭﺷﺮﻭﺣﺎﺕ ﻧﺜﺮﻳﺔ،
ﻭﺍﺧﺘﺘﻢ ﺑﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺰﻣﻮﺭ 18ﻭ ،51ﺃﻭ ﻛﺴﻔﺮ ﺃﻳﻮﺏ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﺘﺘﺢ )
ﺃﻱ ( 1 :3 -1 :1ﻧﺘﺮﺍ ﻭﻳﺨﺘﺘﻢ ) ﺹ .( 17 -7 :42ﻧﺜﺮﺍً .ﺇﻥ ﺟﻤﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻠﻤﺴﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺒﺴﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻳﺒﻌﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎء
ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻌﺜﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ ،ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﻋﺼﺮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﻭﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ .ﺇﻧﺘﻬﻲ ﻧﺼﺎ ً
ﻣﻠﻮﻙ 11ﻋﺪﺩ :41ﻭﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺻﻨﻊ ﻭﺣﻜﻤﺘﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ
ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ(SVD) .
ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ 29ﻋﺪﺩ :29ﻭﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﻴﺮﺓ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ
ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﺛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻭﻓﻲ ﻧﺒ ّﻮﺓ ﺍﺧﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻼﻭﻧﻲ ﻭﻓﻲ ﺭﺅﻯ ﻳﻌﺪﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺮ
ﺑﻌﺎﻡ ﺑﻦ ﻧﺒﺎﻁ(SVD) .
ﺟﺎء ﻓﻲ ﻗﺎﻣﻮﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﺇﺳﻢ ) ﻳﻌﺪﻭ ( ﻫﻜﺬﺍ :ﻳَﻌْﺪﻭ:
ﺍﺳﻢ ﻋﺒﺮﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ )) (( ﺭﺍﺋﻲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺭﺅﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺮﺑﻌﺎﻡ ﺑﻦ ﻧﺒﺎﻁ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺑﺤﻜﻢ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ) 2ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ .( 29 :9
ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ 129ﻋﺪﺩ :29ﻭﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﻴﺮﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ
ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺻﻤﻮﺋﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﻲ ﻭﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﺛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻭﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﻲ
ﻣﺘﻰ 2ﻋﺪﺩ : 23ﻭﺃﺗﻰ ﻭﺳﻜﻦ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﺻﺮﺓ.ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ
ﺑﺎﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﺍﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻰ ﻧﺎﺻﺮﻳﺎ
1ﻣﻠﻮﻙ 14ﻋﺪﺩ :19ﻭﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﻳﺮﺑﻌﺎﻡ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺣﺎﺭﺏ ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﻣﻠﻚ ﻓﺎﻧﻬﺎ
ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻻﻳﺎﻡ ﻟﻤﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ(SVD) .
1ﻣﻠﻮﻙ 14ﻋﺪﺩ :29ﻭﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺭﺣﺒﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ
ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻻﻳﺎﻡ ﻟﻤﻠﻮﻙ ﻳﻬﻮﺫﺍ(SVD) .
2ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ 17ﻋﺪﺩ :9ﻓﻌﻠّﻤﻮﺍ ﻓﻲ ﻳﻬﻮﺫﺍ ﻭﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﻭﺟﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻓﻲ
ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﻣﺪﻥ ﻳﻬﻮﺫﺍ ﻭﻋﻠّﻤﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ(SVD) .
2ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ 20ﻋﺪﺩ :34ﻭﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻳﻬﻮﺷﺎﻓﺎﻁ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﻴﺮﺓ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﺔ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻳﺎﻫﻮ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻣﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ(SVD) .
ﻭﺳﺄﻋﻄﻴﻜﻢ ﻣﻠﺨﺺ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﻟﻠﺘﺬﻛﺮﺓ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ
ﺍﻥ ﷲ ﺃﻧﺰﻟﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﺒﻴﺎﺋﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ :
-1ﺳﻔﺮ ﺣﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺎء ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺮ ﻓﻲ ) ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ( 14 : 21
-2ﺳﻔﺮ ﻳﺎﺷﺮ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺎء ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺮ ﻓﻲ ) ﻳﺸﻮﻉ ( 13 : 10
-3ﺳﻔﺮ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﺎء ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻓﻲ ) ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ( 41 : 11
-4ﺳﻔﺮ ﻣﺮﺛﻴﺔ ﺇﺭﻣﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﻮﺷﻴﺎ ﻣﻠﻚ ﺃﻭﺭﺷﻠﻴﻢ ﻭﺟﺎء ﺫﻛﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺛﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ )
ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ ( 25 :35
-5ﺳﻔﺮ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﻳﻮﺷﻴﺎ ) ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ ( 25 :35
-6ﺳﻔﺮ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻢ ﻳﻮﺷﻴﺎ ) ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ ( 25 :35
-7ﺳﻔﺮ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﺛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ) ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ( 29 : 9
-8ﺳﻔﺮ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺷﻤﻌﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ) ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ).( 15 /12 (2
- 9ﺳﻔﺮ ﺃﺧﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻠﻮﻧﻲ ) ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ( 29 : 9
- 10ﻭﺳﻔﺮ ﺭﺅﻯ ﻳﻌﺪﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﻲ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺎء ﺫﻛﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺳﻔﺎﺭ ﻓﻲ ) ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ( 29 : 9
- 11ﺳﻔﺮ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﻲ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺎء ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻓﻲ ) ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ : 29
( 31
-12ﺳﻔﺮ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﷲ ) ﻳﺸﻮﻉ ( 26 :24
-13ﺳﻔﺮ ﺗﻮﺭﺍﺓ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ) ﻳﺸﻮﻉ ( 31 :8
-14ﺳﻔﺮ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ) ﻳﺸﻮﻉ ( 6 :23
-15ﺳﻔﺮ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺻﻤﻮﺋﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﻲ ) ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ( 29:29
-16ﺳﻔﺮ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﻭﻑ ) ﺭﺅﻳﺎ ﻳﻮﺣﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻼﻫﻮﺗﻲ 8: 13ﻭ ( 21:27
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻛﻼﺭﻙ " :ﺣﺼﻞ ﻟﻘﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎء ﻗﻠﻖ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﺍﻟﻤﺨﻠﻮﻗﺎﺕ ) ﺳﻔﺮ ﻣﻔﻘﻮﺩ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻠﻮﻙ ) ( 13 - 32 /4 (1ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻧﺎ ً ﺃﺑﺪﻳﺎ ً ".
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻁﺎﻣﺲ ﺃﻧﻜﻠﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺛﻮﻟﻴﻜﻲ " :ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﻘﻮﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺳﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺄﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ".
ﻭﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﻴﺔ )ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺃﺑﻮﻛﺮﻳﻔﺎ( :ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻔﻘﻮﺩﺓ ﺇﻟﻰ
ﺍﻟﻜﻮﺭﻧﺜﻴﻴﻦ :ﻓﻔﻲ )1ﻛﻮ (9 :5ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﺭﻧﺜﻴﻴﻦ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ
ﻗﺪ ﻓﻘﺪﺕ.
ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﻧﺘﻈﺮ ﺭﺩ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﺋﻌﻪ ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺭﺩﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﺎ !!
ﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﺗﻜﻔﻞ ﺑﺤﻔﻆ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻤﺪ ہﻠﻟ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻛﻢ ﻓﺄﺭﻧﻲ ﺃﻳﻦ
ﺃﻋﺘﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺑﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﺎﺭ ﺳﻔﺮﺍ ﺳﻔﺮﺍ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻜﻔﻠﻪ ﺑﺤﻔﻈﻬﺎ ؟!
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻛﻢ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻢ ﺃﻭ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﺃﻧﺴﻴﺖ ﻭﺗﻜﻔﻞ ﷲ ﺑﻘﺪﺭﻩ ﺑﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻗﺎﻝ"ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺴﺦ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻧﻨﺴﻬﺎ ﻧﺄﺕ ﺑﺨﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ" ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻙ ﻳﺎ
ﺃﺑﺎﺟﻬﻞ...ﻓﺈﺳﻢ ﺍﻹﻟﻪ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ..ﻭﺃﻅﻦ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺷﺊ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ..ﻓﻌﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻘﺪ ﺇﺳﻤﻪ ﻭﻧﺒﻮﺅﺗﻪ ﻓﻬﻞ ﻳﻌﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ؟
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﺎﻣﺶ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﻷﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﺁﻳﺔ
ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ !
Jn:1:45ﻓﻴﻠﺒﺲ ﻭﺟﺪ ﻧﺜﻨﺎﺋﻴﻞ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻣﻮﺱ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﺮﺓ(SVD) .
ﺛﻢ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻟﻮ ﻓﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﺟﺪﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﺎ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ..ﺃﻓﻴﻜﺘﺐ "ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﺑﻦ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ"ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﺅﺓ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺃﺑﻮﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺒﻨﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻻ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻭﻻ
ﺻﻠﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ...ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﺗﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﺅﺓ ﺑﺈﺳﻤﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺑﻮﻩ
ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ؟!!!!!
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ ﻓﺮﻓﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ!!
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﺭﺍﺟﻌﻪ ﺟﺒﺮﻳﻞ ﻣﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﻴﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﻛﺘﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ
ﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﺗﺐ ﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﻴﺮﻳﻦ ..ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺤﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻭﺭ ﻭﺃﺷﺘﺮﻁ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺤﻒ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ ﺃﺑﻮﺑﻜﺮ ﻭﻣﺤﻔﻮﻅﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﻔﺎﻅ ﻭﺃﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻓﻴﺴﺮ
ﷲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺠﻤﻊ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﺎﺋﺔ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻛﺄﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ
ﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻤﺪ ہﻠﻟ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ .....ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻛﺒﺮ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﺤﻔﻮﻅ ﻣﻦ ﷲ ﺑﻠﻐﺘﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺃﺩﻧﻲ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ!!
" In the preceding section the reader will have seen how, during about
fourteen centuries when the New Testament was transmitted in
handwritten copies, numerous changes and accretions came into the
text. Of the approximately five thousand Greek manuscripts of all or
part of the New Testament that are known today, no two agree exactly
".in all particulars
ﻓﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﺤﻔﻮﻅ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻧﺴﺨﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻓﻲ
ﺃﻳﺪﻱ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺆﻣﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﺤﻔﻈﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﻳﻴﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺻﺪﻭﺭﻫﻢ ﻭﻣﺎﺯﺍﻝ ﻣﺤﻔﻮﻅﺎ
ﺑﻠﻐﺘﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻧﺰﻝ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺑﻞ ..ﻭﻣﻦ ﺣﻔﻆ ﷲ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻐﺘﻪ ﺣﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻤﺆﻣﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻵﻥ..ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻟﻐﺔ ﻣﻴﺘﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻌﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﺍ ﻛﺜﻴﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﺑﻴﺮﻫﺎ.....ﻭﺑﻴﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺿﺎﺋﻌﺔ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ ﻟﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﻐﺎﺕ ﻭﺳﻴﻄﺔ
ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ...ﻣﺜﻼ)ﺇﻧﺠﻴﻞ ﻣﺘﻰ( ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﺋﻊ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ
ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻧﻲ ﺛﻢ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺠﻠﻴﺰﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ..ﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺿﻴﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ
ﻭﺃﻏﻼﻁ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺥ....ﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﻣﻴﺔ ﻓﻜﻼﻣﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ
ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ ..ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻛﻞ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻐﺔ ﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺗﻔﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﺑﻌﺾ
ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﻧﻴﻪ )ﻭﺟﺮﺏ ﺫﻟﻚ( ﻷﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻟﻐﺔ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺼﻬﺎ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﻛﻼﻡ
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻟﻐﺎﺕ ﻭﺳﻴﻄﺔ !!!
ﻭﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﻭﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﻟﻴﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺇﺛﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻮﻙ
ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻳﺪﻣﺮﻫﺎ ...ﻓﺄﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺭﻧﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ ؟!
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ
))1ـ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ )ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ" :(106 :2ﻣﺎ ﻧﻨﺴﺦ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ
ﺑﺨﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ" ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ " ﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ" ﺃﻱ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ
ٍ ﻧُﻨﺴﻬﺎ ﻧﺄﺕ
ﺃﻭ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ) ،ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻴﻂ ﺹ .(264
2ـ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﺮﺽ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻫﻨﺎ :ﻫﻞ ﻭﺣﻲ ﷲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻔﺎﺿﻠﺔ؟ ﺃﻱ ﻫﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺷﻲء ﺣﺴﻦ ﻭﺷﻲء ﺃﺣﺴﻦ؟ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺇﺫﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﻛﻼﻡ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﻁﺎﻟﻤﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺩﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﷲ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻬﺮﺍء؟؟؟؟(( .
) (3ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﺳﺦ ) 40ﺳﻮﺭﺓ( ﻫﻲ:
3ـ ﻳﻮﻧﺲ 2ـ ﺍﻷﻋﺮﺍﻑ 1ـ ﺍﻷﻧﻌﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﺤﺠْ ﺮ
6ـ ِ 5ـ ﺍﻟﺮﻋﺪ 4ـ ﻫﻮﺩ
9ـ ﺍﻟﻜﻬﻒ 8ـ ﺍﻹﺳﺮﺍء 7ـ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ
12ـ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻞ 11ـ ﺍﻟﻤﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ 10ـ ﻁﻪ
15ـ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﻡ 14ـ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻜﺒﻮﺕ 13ـ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺺ
20ـ 18ـ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺋﻜﺔ 19ـ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻓﺎﺕ 17ـ ﺍﻟﻤﻀﺎﺟﻊ 16ـ ﻟﻘﻤﺎﻥ
21ـ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺮ ﺹ
24ـ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﺛﻴﺔ 23ـ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﺎﻥ 22ـ ﺍﻟﺰﺧﺮﻑ
27ـ ﻕ 26ـ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ 25ـ ﺍﻷﺣﻘﺎﻑ
32ـ 30ـ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﺤﺎﻥ 31ـ ﻧﻮﻥ 29ـ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ 28ـ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻢ
33ـ ﺍﻟﻤﺪﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﺭﺝ
36ـ ﻋﺒﺲ 35ـ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ 34ـ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ
39ـ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻦ 38ـ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺷﻴﺔ 37ـ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺭﻕ
40ـ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮﻭﻥ.
) (4ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ) 43ﺳﻮﺭﺓ( ﻣﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻞ ﺳﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ
114ﺳﻮﺭﺓ.
ﻭﺑﺤﺴﺒﺔ ﺑﺴﻴﻄﺔ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻭﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻧﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﻣﺼﺪﺭﺍ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻦ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ"ﻧﻮﺍﺳﺦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻹﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺯﻱ"
ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺧﺒﺮﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻘﻞ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭﺍ ﻣﻜﺬﻭﺑﺔ ﺛﻢ ﻳﻈﻞ ﻟﺼﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﻭﻛﺘﺐ ﻳﺒﻨﻲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻭﻫﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﺧﻴﺎﻻﺗﻪ ﻭﻳﺤﺴﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﺘﻐﺰﻝ ﺑﻬﺎ !
ﻓﻬﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻧﻮﺍﺳﺦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻹﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺯﻱ ﻟﻴﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ
ﻣﻨﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎﻧﺔ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ
))ﺯﻋﻢ ﺟﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺴﺮﻳﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻀﻤﻨﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ
ﺧﻤﺲ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ ﻭﺁﻝ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎء ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﻔﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺑﺔ
ﻭﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ ﻭﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎء ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺞ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﺍء
ﻭﺍﻷﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭﺳﺒﺄ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺆﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﺍﺭﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺠﺎﺩﻟﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺰﻣﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺩﺧﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ
ﺃﺭﺑﻌﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺮﺍﻑ ﻭﻳﻮﻧﺲ ﻭﻫﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻋﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺠﺮ ﻭﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻬﻒ
ﻭﻁﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻤﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺼﺺ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻨﻜﺒﻮﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﻡ ﻭﻟﻘﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺠﺪﺓ
ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻼﺋﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﻭﺹ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺑﻴﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﺧﺮﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺧﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺠﺎﺛﻴﺔ
ﻭﺍﻷﺣﻘﺎﻑ ﻭﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻭﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻤﺘﺤﻨﺔ ﻭﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﺭﺝ
ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺪﺛﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻋﺒﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺎﺭﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮﻭﻥ
ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﻠﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﺳﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺸﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﻓﻘﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻐﺎﺑﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻼﻕ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ ﻧﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ
ﺛﻼﺙ ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﻮﻥ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺗﺤﺔ ﻭﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﻭﻳﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺠﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺪ
ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺠﻤﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺎﻗﺔ ﻭﻧﻮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺠﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺮﺳﻼﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺒﺄ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻔﻄﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻄﻔﻔﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺸﻘﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺮﻭﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺠﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪ
ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﺤﻰ ﻭﺃﻟﻢ ﻧﺸﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻔﻜﺎﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻟﺰﻟﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﺎﺛﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻬﻤﺰﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻭﻗﺮﻳﺶ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻮﺛﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺮ ﻭﺗﺒﺖ ﻭﺍﻹﺧﻼﺹ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻠﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺤﺼﺮ
ﺗﺨﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺣﺼﺮﻭﻩ ﻭﷲ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﻓﻖ ((
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻋﺒﺪ ﷲ ﺑﺪﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺤﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ !
ﻗﺪ ﺑﺪﺃﻫﺎ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺯﻱ ﺑﻜﻠﻤﺔ "ﺯﻋﻢ" ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻋﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﺩﻋﺎء ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﻁﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ
ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪ ﻭﺧﺘﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﻒ !!
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﻓﻲ !!
ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻔﺎﺭﻗﺔ ﺃﻧﻲ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﻟﺒﻄﺮﺱ –ﻻ ﺃﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻳﻦ -ﺣﻠﻘﺔ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ "ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻧﺔ"!!!
ﺛﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻐﻴﻈﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺒﺮﻛﺔ ﻳﺠﻠﺲ ﻳﺤﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﺤﺴﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺐ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﺝ
ﻟﻚ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺧﺔ ﻓﻜﺎﻧﺖ %62.8
ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻳﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ ﺛﻢ ﻳﺨﺼﺺ ﻓﺼﻮﻻ ﻭﻛﺘﺐ ﻓﻲ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ
ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻭﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ..ﺇﻟﺦ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺊ ﻋﺪﻳﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺦ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻠﻮﻁﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ
ﻧﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺯﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺨﺮﻳﻒ ...ﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺟﺪﻻ....ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭ ﺩﺧﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻧﺴﺨﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ !!
ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺟﺎء ﻫﻮ ﺑﺈﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺗﻔﻀﺤﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺣﺴﺒﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺊ
ﻋﺪﻳﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺦ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ "ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺧﺔ" ﻭﺟﻌﻞ % 62ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ
ﺟﻬﻞ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺭﺑﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺁﻳﺘﻴﻦ
ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺧﺘﻴﻦ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺒﺎء ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺾ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻹﺳﺘﺤﻤﺎﺭ ﻟﻘﺎﺭﺋﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺤﺴﺐ ﻟﻬﻢ
ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﺃﻥ %62ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ "ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ " -ﺑﻠﻔﻆ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ!! -
ﻧﺤﻦ ﻻ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺷﻴﺨﺎ ﺇﺳﻤﻪ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻹﺑﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻁﻼﻕ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺭﺟﺢ
ﺷﻴﺨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻴﻮﺧﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﺤﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺼﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭﻛﺜﻴﺮﺍ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻳﺴﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺣﺪﺓ
ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻴﻮﺥ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻠﻘﺔ 39ﻓﻲ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﺣﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ "ﺟﺎء ﻓﻲ )ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ
ﺧﻠﻴﻞ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ "ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﺍﻟﻤﺆﺳﺲ" ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﻘﻔﻴﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺧﻠﻴﻞ
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﻣﻠﺤﺪ ﺯﻧﺪﻳﻖ ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ "ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﺍﻟﻤﺆﺳﺲ ﻭﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻪ" ﺗﻤﻸ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ
ﺍﻟﻼﺩﻳﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ...ﻭﻟﻢ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺧﻠﻴﻞ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺷﻴﺦ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ
ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﺳﻮﺩ ﷲ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺏ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺷﻴﺨﺎ ﺯﺍﻋﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎء
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﻋﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﻁﻠﻪ..ﻓﺒﺄﻱ ﺭﺩ ﺳﺨﻴﻒ ﺳﻴﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﻋﻦ
ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻴﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻱ ﻧﺼﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺋﺢ؟!!
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺿﻊ ﺭﺃﺳﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺼﻠﺔ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ..ﻷﻧﻪ ﻻ
ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ..ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻦ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﺳﺦ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﺑﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﺎ !!
ﺃﺭﻧﻲ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﺤﻼﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺮﺍﻡ( ؟ ﺃﺭﻧﻲ ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺴﺦ
ﻫﻨﺎ؟!
ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﻳﺨﺘﺮﻉ ﻭﻳﺆﻟﻒ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎ ﺳﺨﻴﻔﺎ ﻣﻔﻀﻮﺣﺎ !!
ﺛﻢ ﻻﺣﻆ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﻨﻜﺸﻒ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺑﺔ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺑﺔ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ )) ﻫﺬﻩ
ﻫﻲ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺧﺔ ﻓﻲ 60ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﺃﻱ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ 230ﺁﻳﺔ.
ﻭﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻋﺰﻳﺰﻯ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﺉ ﻟﻮ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﺍﻹﺑﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻓﻰ ) ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺹ ( 168ﻭﻫﻰ 144ﻣﻮﻗﻌﺎ ً ،ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻛﻢ
ﺁﻳﺔ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺧﺔ ﻧﺤﺼﻞ؟ .ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﺑﺤﺴﺒﺔ ﺑﺴﻴﻄﺔ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻰ 230ﺁﻳﺔ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺧﺔ ﻓﻰ 60ﻣﻮﻗﻌﺎً ،ﻓﺒﻘﺴﻤﺔ 230
ﻋﻠﻰ 60ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺗﺞ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻰ 4ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ) ﺃﻯ ﺑﻤﻌﺪﻝ 4ﺁﻳﺎﺕ
ﻓﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ( ،ﻭﺑﻀﺮﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺪﻝ ﻓﻰ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ
ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻹﺑﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﻫﻰ 144ﻧﺤﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻰ 550ﺁﻳﺔ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺧﺔ ﻓﻰ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﺟﺪﺍً .ﻳﺎﻟﻠﻬﻮﻝ !!!! ((.
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﻟﻨﻔﺘﺮﺽ ﺻﺤﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﺗﻪ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻠﻪ ﺃﻥ 230ﺁﻳﺔ ﺷﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ
ﻫﻮ...ﻓﻬﻞ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﻛﻢ ﺁﻳﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ؟!
ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺍﺏ :ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ 6000ﺁﻳﺔ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ !!
ﻓﻠﻮ ﺣﺴﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻓﻠﻦ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ...ﺣﺴﺐ ﺇﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻬﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺫﻛﺮ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮﻭﻥ !!
ﻛﻴﻒ ﻭﺻﻞ ﻓﻴﺜﺎﻏﻮﺭﺙ ﻋﺼﺮﻩ ﻭﺃﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ 230ﺁﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ 6000
ﺗﺴﺎﻭﻱ %62.8؟!!!
ﻭﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻣﻮﻟﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﺤﺴﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻬﺎﺋﻤﻴﺔ ..ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﻳﺨﺘﺮﻉ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻨﻘﻞ ﺃﻛﺎﺫﻳﺒﺎ ﻣﺤﻀﺔ ﺛﻢ ﻳﺠﻠﺲ ﻳﺤﺴﺐ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ –ﻭﻳﺎﻟﻴﺘﻪ ﻳﺤﺴﺐ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺎ
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ -ﺎ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻓﻀﺤﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻤﺪ ہﻠﻟ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ!!
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺃﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺃﻋﺮﻑ ﻣﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺳﺘﺤﻤﺎﺭ ﻟﻘﺎﺭﺋﻴﻪ ﻭﻟﻤﺸﺎﻫﺪﻳﻪ ..ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﻧﻘﻞ 60ﻣﻮﺿﻌﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ..ﻭﻟﻔﺮﻁ ﺣﺒﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﻭﺇﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺄﺕ ﺑﺒﻘﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻭﻫﻲ 144ﻣﻮﻗﻌﺎ ...ﺭﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﺨﺎﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺸﺎﻋﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ...ﻓﻤﻦ
ﻓﺮﻁ ﺣﺒﻪ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﺪﻣﻨﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺄﺗﻲ ﺑﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﺿﻊ ..ﺃﺭﺣﻤﻮﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ..ہﻠﻟ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻳﻨﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻓﺴﻴﺘﺄﺧﺮ ؟!!!!!!!
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺇﺳﺘﺤﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻟﻘﺎﺭﺋﻴﺔ –ﻭﺃﻅﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﻤﻮﺭﻳﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺓ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺇﺳﺘﺤﻤﺎﺭﺍ-
ﻓﺎﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭ ﻭﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺧﺔ ﺑﻬﺎ ﻭﺫﻛﺮﺕ 60ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﻗﺎﻝ
"ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﻧﻴﺔ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺁﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻯ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺁﻳﺘﻴﻦ ...ﺇﻟﺦ" ﻭﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﻳﺰﻋﻢ
ﺃﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ 144ﻣﻮﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎء ﺑﻪ ..ﺃﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ 114
ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ..ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺄﺗﻲ ﺏ 144ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻑ ؟!!!
ﺷﺊ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻒ ﺑﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﻓﺤﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺐ ﻻ ﻳﺠﻴﺪﻩ !!
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻐﻴﻆ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﺘﻪ ))ﺃﻳﻦ ﻋﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ؟؟؟؟ ﺇﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ
ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻴﺐ ﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻹﺭﻫﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻲ!!!
ﺃﻟﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻧﺒﻲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﺤﻖ ﻋﺒﻘﺮﻳﺎً ،ﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺩ ﺇﺫ ﺳﻤﻰ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ "ﻋﺒﻘﺮﻳﺔ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ" ((.
ﻭﻟﻠﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ..ﺃﻭﻻ :ﻭﻛﺄﻥ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﺨﻔﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻣﻐﻴﻴﺒﻴﻦ..ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻴﺒﻴﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻷﻥ
ﻋﻠﻤﺎء ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺻﻨﻔﻮﺍ ﺁﻻﻑ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ ...ﻭﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ
ﺗﻜﻠﻤﺖ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ !!
ﻭﻛﻮﻥ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻜﺮﻩ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺁﺧﺮ!!
ﻭﻛﻮﻥ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻬﻤﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍء ﻟﻴﻄﻌﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺩﻳﻨﻨﺎ ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻳﻄﻌﻦ ﻓﻲ
ﻧﺤﺮﻩ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺁﺧﺮ !!
ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﺪﻱ ﺇﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺌﺔ"ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ" ...
ﻭﺍﻹﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻦ ﻛﺜﻴﺮ
))ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ،ﻟﻤﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ ،ﻭﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﻗﻮﻋﻪ((.
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺑﻦ ﻛﺜﻴﺮ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮﻩ ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﻭﻏﻴﺮﻫﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺩﻭﺍ ﺭﺩﻭﺩﺍ
ﻣﻔﺤﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ..ﻭﻟﻸﺳﻒ ﻟﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺯﻣﻨﻪ ﻧﺼﺎﺭﻯ
ﻛﺎﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺑﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻭﺗﺎﺑﻌﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﺍﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻘﺮﺃﻭﺍ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻬﻢ )ﻋﺒﺮﺍﻧﻴﻦ .. ( 18 : 7ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻦ ﻛﺜﻴﺮ:
))ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻟﻠﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﻧﻜﺮﻭﺍ ﻧَ ْﺴ َﺦ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺭﺍﺓ ،ﻭﺟﺤﺪﻭﺍ ﻧﺒﻮﺓ
ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻭﻣﺤﻤﺪ ،ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ،ﻟﻤﺠﻴﺌﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻤﺎ ﺟﺎءﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﷲ ﺑﺘﻐﻴﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻏﻴﺮ ﷲ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺭﺍﺓ .ﻓﺄﺧﺒﺮﻫﻢ ﷲ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻭﺳﻠﻄﺎﻧﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻖ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺘﻪ ﻭﻁﺎﻋﺘﻪ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺎﻋﺔ ﻷﻣﺮﻩ ﻭﻧﻬﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻣﺮﻫﻢ ﺑﻤﺎ
ﻳﺸﺎء ،ﻭﻧﻬﻴﻬﻢ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻳﺸﺎء ،ﻭﻧﺴﺦ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺎء ،ﻭﺇﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺎء ،ﻭﺇﻧﺸﺎء ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺎء
ﻣﻦ ﺇﻗﺮﺍﺭﻩ ﻭﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﻭﻧﻬﻴﻪ.
]ﻭﺃﻣﺮ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ،ﺑﺬﺑﺢ ﻭﻟﺪﻩ ،ﺛﻢ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺮ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺑﻨﻰ ﺇﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﻘﺘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ،ﺛﻢ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﻛﻴﻼ ﻳﺴﺘﺄﺻﻠﻬﻢ
ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ [.
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺤﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ،ﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺩ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ؛
ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺤﻜﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺎء ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻭﻗﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ
ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻭﺷﺮﺍﺋﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺿﻴﺔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻞ ﻵﺩﻡ ﺗﺰﻭﻳﺞ ﺑﻨﺎﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻨﻴﻪ ،ﺛﻢ ﺣﺮﻡ
ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺑﺎﺡ ﻟﻨﻮﺡ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻴﻨﺔ ﺃﻛﻞ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ،ﺛﻢ ﻧﺴﺦ
ِﺣﻞﱡ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻧﻜﺎﺡ ﺍﻷﺧﺘﻴﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺡ ﻹﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻭﺑﻨﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﺮﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻲ
ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺭﺍﺓ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ .ﻭﺃﺷﻴﺎء ﻛﺜﻴﺮﺓ ﻳﻄﻮﻝ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ
ﻭﻳﺼﺪﻓﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﻪ .ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺠﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺑﺄﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﻟﻔﻈﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻼ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ
ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻨﻰ ،ﺇﺫ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺼﻮﺩ.....ﻭﻗﺮﺉ ﻓﻲ ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺁﻝ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻲ
ﻧﺰﻝ ﺻﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﺧﻄﺎﺑًﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻓﻲ ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ
ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰُ } :ﻛﻞﱡ ﺍﻟﻄﱠ َﻌ ِﺎﻡ َﻛ َ
ﺎﻥ ِﺣﻼ ﻟِﺒَﻨِﻲ ﺇِ ْﺳ َﺮﺍﺋِﻴ َﻞ ﺇِﻻ َﻣﺎ َﺣ ﱠﺮ َﻡ ﺇِ ْﺳ َﺮﺍﺋِﻴ ُﻞ َﻋﻠَﻰ ﻧَ ْﻔ ِﺴ ِﻪ
{ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ]ﺁﻝ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ [93 :ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺄﺗﻲ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﻮﻥ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ،ﻟﻤﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ،
ﻭﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﻗﻮﻋﻪ(( .
ﻟﻘﺪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺃﻗﺮﺑﺎء ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭﺍ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ:
Mk:3:21ﻭﻟﻤﺎ ﺳﻤﻊ ﺍﻗﺮﺑﺎﺅﻩ ﺧﺮﺟﻮﺍ ﻟﻴﻤﺴﻜﻮﻩ ﻻﻧﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ.
)(SVD
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﺯﻳﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺂﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﺒﺘﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻴﻀﺮﺑﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ
ﻣﺪﻋﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﻵﻳﺔ "ﻻ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﷲ" ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺮﺍءﺓ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ
ﻓﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﻗﻬﺎ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻨﻰ:
ﻚ َﻭﻟَ ِﻜ ﱠﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﱠﺎﻟِ ِﻤ َ
ﻴﻦ ﺑِﺂَﻳَﺎ ِ
ﺕ ﻮﻥ ﻓَﺈِﻧﱠﻬُ ْﻢ َﻻ ﻳُ َﻜ ﱢﺬﺑُﻮﻧَ َ ﻚ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬﻱ ﻳَﻘُﻮﻟُ َ ))ﻗَ ْﺪ ﻧَ ْﻌﻠَ ُﻢ ﺇِﻧﱠﻪُ ﻟَﻴَﺤْ ُﺰﻧُ َ
ﺼﺒَﺮُﻭﺍ َﻋﻠَﻰ َﻣﺎ ُﻛ ﱢﺬﺑُﻮﺍ َﻭﺃُﻭ ُﺫﻭﺍ ﻚ ﻓَ َ ﺖ ُﺭ ُﺳ ٌﻞ ِﻣ ْﻦ ﻗَ ْﺒﻠِ َ ﻭﻥ ) َ (33ﻭﻟَﻘَ ْﺪ ُﻛ ﱢﺬﺑَ ْ ﷲِ ﻳَﺠْ َﺤ ُﺪ َ ﱠ
ﻴﻦ ) (34 ﻙ ِﻣ ْﻦ ﻧَﺒَﺈ ِ ْﺍﻟ ُﻤﺮْ َﺳﻠِ َ ﷲِ َﻭﻟَﻘَ ْﺪ َﺟﺎ َء َ ﺕ ﱠ َﺣﺘﱠﻰ ﺃَﺗَﺎﻫُ ْﻢ ﻧَﺼْ ُﺮﻧَﺎ َﻭ َﻻ ُﻣﺒَ ﱢﺪ َﻝ ﻟِ َﻜﻠِ َﻤﺎ ِ
ﺍﻷﻧﻌﺎﻡ
ﻭﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﺪ ﺍﻹﻟﻬﻲ ﺑﻨﺼﺮ ﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ !
ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ "ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺗﺰﻭﻻﻥ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻲ ﻻ ﻳﺰﻭﻝ"
ﻳﻘﺘﻄﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﻗﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻣﻘﻴﺪ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﺎﻡ !
Mt:24:29-35
29ﻭﻟﻠﻮﻗﺖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻻﻳﺎﻡ ﺗﻈﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻤﺮ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﺿﺆﻩ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﻡ ﺗﺴﻘﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﻭﻗﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻮﺍﺕ ﺗﺘﺰﻋﺰﻉ.
30ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء.ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺗﻨﻮﺡ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﻗﺒﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻻﺭﺽ ﻭﻳﺒﺼﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺁﺗﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﻣﺠﺪ ﻛﺜﻴﺮ.
31ﻓﻴﺮﺳﻞ ﻣﻼﺋﻜﺘﻪ ﺑﺒﻮﻕ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻓﻴﺠﻤﻌﻮﻥ ﻣﺨﺘﺎﺭﻳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺭﺑﻊ
ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻗﺼﺎء ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻗﺼﺎﺋﻬﺎ.
.32ﻓﻤﻦ ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻦ ﺗﻌﻠّﻤﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﻞ ﻣﺘﻰ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻏﺼﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺧﺼﺎ ﻭﺍﺧﺮﺟﺖ
ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻗﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻒ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ.
33ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻢ ﺍﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﺘﻰ ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﺍﻧﻪ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺑﻮﺍﺏ.
34ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺍﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻤﻀﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﻞ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ.
35ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﻭﺍﻻﺭﺽ ﺗﺰﻭﻻﻥ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻲ ﻻ ﻳﺰﻭﻝ(SVD).
ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻧﺒﻮﺅﺍﺕ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻳﻘﺴﻢ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺳﺘﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﻞ ﻭﻳﺤﻠﻒ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﻟﻮ ﺯﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻟﻦ ﺗﺰﻭﻝ ﻧﺒﻮﺅﺗﻪ ..ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ "ﻻ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ
ﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﷲ" ﺃﻱ ﻓﻲ ﻭﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﻨﺼﺮ ﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ...ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺅﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺔ ﻭﺃﻧﺘﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﻓﻲ ﻏﺰﻭﺓ ﺗﻠﻮ ﻏﺰﻭﺓ ﻭﻓﺘﺢ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﻣﻜﺔ ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﺻﺮﺍ ﻭﻓﺘﺢ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻭﻣﻠﻜﺖ ﺃﻣﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻧﺼﻒ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ
ﻭﺩﻣﺮﺕ ﺍﻷﻣﺒﺮﺍﻁﻮﺭﻳﺘﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﺘﻴﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻭﺝ ﻗﻮﺗﻬﻤﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻭﻋﺪ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﺃﻧﻬﻢ
ﺳﻴﻐﻨﻤﻮﻥ ﺃﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﺮﻯ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﻘﻮﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﷲ ...ﺃﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺅﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺯﻭﺭﺍ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻴﺢ "ﻻ ﻳﻤﻀﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﻞ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ
ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎء ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺗﺰﻭﻻﻥ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻲ ﻻ ﻳﺰﻭﻝ" ﻗﺪ ﺇﺗﻀﺢ ﻛﺬﺑﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻣﻀﻰ
ﺍﻟﺠﻴﻞ ﻭﺃﺟﻴﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻴﺢ ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺭﺍﺓ
Dt 18:22ﻓﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﻭ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺤﺪﺙ ﻭ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺼﺮ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺑﻞ ﺑﻄﻐﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻲ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻓﻘﻂ!!
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ "ﻻ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺗﻪ" ﻓﺎﻟﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻦ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻓﺒﻌﺜﻮﺍ ﻟﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﻟﺲ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺤﺮﻑ ﻟﻬﻢ
ﺍﻹﻧﺠﻴﻞ ﻭﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻞ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻟﻬﻢ ﻧﺼﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ!!! ...ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﻌﺜﻮﺍ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﷲ ﺑﻦ
ﺳﺒﺄ ﻭﺣﺎﻭﻟﻮﺍ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﺍ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺸﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻣﺼﻴﺮﻫﻢ ﻷﻥ ﷲ ﻗﺎﻝ "ﺇﻧﺎ ﻧﺤﻦ ﻧﺰﻟﻨﺎ
ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﺇﻧﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻓﻈﻮﻥ" !!
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ ﻭﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺣﻼﻝ ﻭﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻓﻠﻠﻪ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ..ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ
ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺷﻨﻊ ﻭﺟﻪ –ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﺳﻨﺒﻴﻦ
ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﺑﻌﺸﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺼﻞ!! -
ﻛﻌﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻄﻴﺤﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺘﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻊ ..ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺃﻥ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﻣﻦ ﻁﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ ،ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﷲ
ﺑﻦ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺑﻜﺮ ،ﻋﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﺓ ،ﻋﻦ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ .
ﻗﻴﻞ ﻷﺣﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻔﺮﺩ ﺑﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﺗﻘﺒﻠﻪ ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ )) :ﻻ ،ﻭﷲ
ﺇﻧﻲ ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻪ ﻳﺤﺪﺙ ﻋﻦ ﺟﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺫﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺫﺍ ((
) ﺗﻬﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ) . ( 422 : 24
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﻻ ﺃﻛﺎﺩ ﺃﺟﺪ ﻧﺼﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺇﻻ ﻭﻳﺤﻔﻈﻪ ..ﻓﺤﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﻭﺍﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺭﻛﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ
ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﻳﺤﻔﻈﻬﻢ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺫﻳﺐ !!
ﻭﻁﺒﻌﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺭﺿﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺮ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﻀﻠﺔ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﻴﺮﻳﻦ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺩ ﻭﻋﺎﺩ ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﻠﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻬﻠﻮﺍﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﺑﺪ ﺍﻹﻟﻪ ﺭﺍﺿﻊ
ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ )ﻟﻮﻗﺎ (27 : 11ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺿﻮﻉ
http://islam4all.ifastnet.com/lies/rda3_mojahed.htm
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻏﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻔﻠﺲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﺔ ﻓﻲ
ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ !
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ))ﻭﺍﺳﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻱ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺧﻔﻲ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ!!!! ﺑﻨﺎء ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻤﺔ ﺭﺿﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺳﻬﻠﺔ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﺖ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺑﺬﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻴﻞ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﺮﻭﺓ" :ﺇﻥ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﺄﻣﺮ ﺃﺧﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻡ
ﻛﻠﺜﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺑﻨﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﻴﻬﺎ ،ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺿﻌﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺧﻠﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ"
ﺻﺪﻗﻨﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻔﺔ )ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ "ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺥ"
ﻷﺑﻲ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺱ ﺹ ((. !!! (124
-2ﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﺫﻣﻴﻴﻦ ...ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ "ﻣﻦ ﺁﺫﻱ ﺫﻣﻴﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺁﺫﻯ ﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ"
ﻭﻳﺘﻜﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺤﻤﺎﻳﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﻳﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻈﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﻓﻲ ﻅﻞ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ!
ﻭﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻳﻘﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺫﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺮﻛﻴﻦ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ "ﻻ ﺇﻛﺮﺍﻩ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ"!
-3ﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻳﻦ ...ﻭﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻗﻮﻝ ﷲ "ﻓﻤﺎ ﺇﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﻮﺍ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻓﺎﺳﺘﻘﻴﻤﻮﺍ
ﻟﻬﻢ"
-4ﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﺭﺑﻴﻦ ...ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻛﻞ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﻬﺎﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﷲ ﻭﻟﻴﻌﻠﻢ
ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻒ !!
ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﺨﻠﻂ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺌﺎﺕ ﻳﺤﺪﺙ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺤﺪﺙ ...ﻭﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺭﻧﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻳﻘﻴﻤﻮﻧﻬﺎ ﻳﻘﻴﻤﻮﻧﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺃﻋﻮﺝ ﻓﻴﺄﺗﻲ ﻟﻚ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻴﺴﻮﻉ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ
"ﷲ ﻣﺤﺒﺔ" ﺛﻢ ﻳﺄﺗﻲ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ "ﻗﺎﺗﻠﻮﺍ ﻓﻲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﷲ" ﺇﻟﺦ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﻒ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻓﺄﻧﺖ ﻻ ﺗﺮﺿﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﷲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ "ﻟﻦ ﺗﺪﺧﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﺤﺎﺑﻮﺍ "..ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻳﻬﻮﻩ " ﺣﺰﻗﻴﺎﻝ َ 6 :9ﻭﺍﺿْ ِﺮﺑُﻮﺍ ﻻَ ﺗُ ْﺸﻔِ ْﻖ ﺃَ ْﻋﻴُﻨُ ُﻜ ْﻢ َﻭﻻَ
ﻄ ْﻔ َﻞ َﻭﺍﻟﻨﱢ َﺴﺎ َء .ﺍ ْﻗﺘُﻠُﻮﺍ ﻟِ ْﻠﻬَﻼَ ِﻙ" .
ﺗَ ْﻌﻔُﻮﺍ .ﺍَﻟ ﱠﺸ ْﻴ َﺦ َﻭﺍﻟ ﱠﺸﺎﺏﱠ َﻭ ْﺍﻟ َﻌ ْﺬ َﺭﺍ َء َﻭﺍﻟ ﱢ
ﻓﻴﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻳﻔﻘﻬﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﻔﻜﺮﻭﻥ ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ﻟﻴﺘﻔﻜﺮﻭﺍ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻟﻬﻢ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ
ﻭﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻨﺎﺋﺲ !!
ﻓﺮﻕ ﺿﺨﻢ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺑﻴﻦ "ﺇﻗﺘﻠﻮﺍ" ﻭ"ﻗﺎﺗﻠﻮﺍ" ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻖ ﻳﺤﺮﻑ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺇﻻ
"ﻓﺈﻗﺘﻠﻮﺍ" ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺩﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﺴﺎﻧﻪ ﺯﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ "ﻗﺎﺗﻠﻮﺍ" !!!
ﺛﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﻀﺤﻚ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻧﻘﺘﻠﻬﻢ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﻌﻄﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﻳﺔ ؟!..ﺃﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺃﺩﺭﻱ ؟!
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻳﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﻟﻮﺣﺪﻩ ..ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﺏ
ﻭﺍﻟﺠﺰﻳﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ –ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻒ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ
ﻟﻠﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺣﺒﻴﺐ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ-
http://www.ef7am.com/Files/Books/hbib.exe
ﺃﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﻳﺔ
Dt:20:10ﺣﻴﻦ ﺗﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﻟﻜﻲ ﺗﺤﺎﺭﺑﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻋﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺢ11 .
ﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺎﺑﺘﻚ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺢ ﻭﻓﺘﺤﺖ ﻟﻚ ﻓﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻚ
ﻟﻠﺘﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻌﺒﺪ ﻟﻚ 12 .ﻭﺍﻥ ﻟﻢ ﺗﺴﺎﻟﻤﻚ ﺑﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﺖ ﻣﻌﻚ ﺣﺮﺑﺎ ﻓﺤﺎﺻﺮﻫﺎ.
13ﻭﺍﺫﺍ ﺩﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻬﻚ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻳﺪﻙ ﻓﺎﺿﺮﺏ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺫﻛﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺤﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻒ.
14ﻭﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎء ﻭﺍﻻﻁﻔﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻬﺎﺋﻢ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﻛﻞ ﻏﻨﻴﻤﺘﻬﺎ
ﻓﺘﻐﺘﻨﻤﻬﺎ ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻚ ﻭﺗﺄﻛﻞ ﻏﻨﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻋﺪﺍﺋﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻬﻚ(SVD) .
ﺑﻞ ﻭﻧﺴﺦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻢ –ﺍﻟﻤﺨﻔﻒ -ﺑﺤﻜﻢ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺣﺰﻗﻴﺎﻝ !!
ﺣﺰﻗﻴﺎﻝ َ 6 :9ﻭﺍﺿْ ِﺮﺑُﻮﺍ ﻻَ ﺗُ ْﺸﻔِ ْﻖ ﺃَ ْﻋﻴُﻨُ ُﻜ ْﻢ َﻭﻻَ ﺗَ ْﻌﻔُﻮﺍ .ﺍَﻟ ﱠﺸ ْﻴ َﺦ َﻭﺍﻟ ﱠﺸﺎﺏﱠ َﻭ ْﺍﻟ َﻌ ْﺬ َﺭﺍ َء
ﻄ ْﻔ َﻞ َﻭﺍﻟﻨﱢ َﺴﺎ َء .ﺍ ْﻗﺘُﻠُﻮﺍ ﻟِ ْﻠﻬَﻼَ ِﻙ.
َﻭﺍﻟ ﱢ
ﺛﻢ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺍﻣﻞ
ﻫﻮﺷﻊ ] )) [ 16 : 13ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺗﺸﻖ ((
ﺛﻢ ﺃﻧﺖ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﻗﺎﻝ "ﻣﻠﻌﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻤﻨﻊ ﺳﻴﻔﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ " ........ﺳﻔﺮ
ﺇﺭﻣﻴﺎء .. 10 :48ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﻧﺸﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﻨﺎﺷﻴﺮ ﺭﺣﻤﺔ ﻭﺷﻔﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﻭﺃﺑﻴﻪ ﻳﻬﻮﻩ
)ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻻﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ( 2 :20
ﺣﻘﺎ ﷲ ﻣﺤﺒﺔ ...ﻭﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺛﻘﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻧﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻭﻟﻬﺬﺍ ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﺬﺍﺑﺢ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻣﺎﺯﺍﻝ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺑﺴﻢ
ﻳﺴﻮﻉ ﻭﻳﻬﻮﻩ!!
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻧﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ..ﻓﻠﻴﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺩﻋﺎء ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺒﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﻌﺘﺮﻑ
ﺃﻥ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﺎﻝ ﻭﺣﺴﺐ ...ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﺬﺍﺑﺢ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﻗﺘﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎء ﻭﺍﻷﻁﻔﺎﻝ!!
ﻭﻫﺎ ﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻓﻜﻲ ﺃﺳﺪ ﻓﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﺗﺨﺘﺎﺭﻭﻥ ؟!!
ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻟﺬﻳﺬ ﺭﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻬﻮﺩ ﻳﻬﻮﻩ ﻟﻠﻘﺲ "ﺑﺮﺳﻮﻡ ﻣﻴﺨﺎﺋﻴﻞ" ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻑ
ﺟﺪﺍ ﻓﻌﻨﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ "ﻳﻬﻮﻩ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻭﺇﻟﻪ ﺷﻌﺐ ﺇﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺴﻮﻉ
ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ" ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻧﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ!
ﻓﻠﻴﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺬﺍﺑﺢ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﻗﺘﻞ ﺍﻷﻁﻔﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎء
ﺑﺄﺷﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻔﻌﻠﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﻴﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻵﻥ!!
ﺃﻭ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺪﻟﺲ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﺴﺦ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺬﺍﺑﺢ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﺗﺴﻘﻂ ﻛﻞ ﺇﺩﻋﺎﺋﺎﺕ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ
ﻭﻣﺼﺪﺍﻗﻴﺘﻪ!!
ﺛﻢ ﻣﺮﺍﺕ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﺓ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﺢ ))ﻛﻨﺘﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺳﻤﻌﺘﻢ ...ﻛﺬﺍ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ.....ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ
ﻓﺄﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻜﻢ....ﻛﺬﺍ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ (( ﻣﺜﻞ )ﻣﺘﻰ (21 :5ﻭ)ﻣﺘﻰ ( 27 : 5ﻓﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ؟!
ﺃﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻄﻊ "ﺭﻓﻊ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﺑﺤﻜﻢ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﺁﺧﺮ "
ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﺤﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻜﻢ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ !!
ﻓﻮﷲ ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻟﻴﺒﻴﻦ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﻟﻤﺠﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ..ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﷲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ
ﻳﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺮﻛﻴﻦ ﻭﺑﻴﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻻ ﻹﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ
ﻓﺎﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻣﺸﺮﻛﻮﻥ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ...ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻘﺎﻳﺎ ﺣﻖ ﻭﺑﻘﺎﻳﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺇﻟﻬﻲ...ﻭﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻁﻌﻮﻧﺎﺗﻪ ﺗﺒﻴﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﺃﺑﻮﺟﻬﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺭﻣﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ!
ﻟﺤﻤﺪ ہﻠﻟ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻀﺢ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﻭﺑﻴﻦ ﻛﺬﺑﻪ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻷﻱ ﻧﺼﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﻟﺤﻤﺪ ہﻠﻟ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻴﻦ.
ﻳﻦ َﻛ ﱠﺬﺑُﻮﺍ ﻮﻥ ) (69ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ ﺼ َﺮﻓُ َ ﷲِ ﺃَﻧﱠﻰ ﻳُ ْ ﺕ ﱠ ﻮﻥ ﻓِﻲ ﺁﻳَﺎ ِ ﻳﻦ ﻳُ َﺠﺎ ِﺩﻟُ َ ﺃَﻟَ ْﻢ ﺗَ َﺮ ﺇِﻟَﻰ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬ َ
ﻮﻥ ) (70ﺇِ ِﺫ ْﺍﻷَ ْﻏ َﻼ ُﻝ ﻓِﻲ ﻑ ﻳَ ْﻌﻠَ ُﻤ َ ﺴ ْﻮ َ ﺳﻠَﻨَﺎ ﻓَ َ ﺳ ْﻠﻨَﺎ ﺑِ ِﻪ ُﺭ ُ ﺏ َﻭﺑِ َﻤﺎ ﺃَ ْﺭ َ ﺑِﺎ ْﻟ ِﻜﺘَﺎ ِ
ﻭﻥ ) (72 ﺴ َﺠ ُﺮ َ ﻴﻢ ﺛُ ﱠﻢ ﻓِﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﱠﺎ ِﺭ ﻳُ ْ ﻮﻥ ) (71ﻓِﻲ ﺍ ْﻟ َﺤ ِﻤ ِ ﺴ َﺤﺒُ َ ﺳ ُﻞ ﻳُ ْ ﺴ َﻼ ِ ﺃَ ْﻋﻨَﺎﻗِ ِﻬ ْﻢ َﻭﺍﻟ ﱠ
ﺿﻠﱡﻮﺍ َﻋﻨﱠﺎ ﺑَﻞ ﻟﱠ ْﻢ ﷲِ ﻗَﺎﻟُﻮﺍ َ ُﻭﻥ ﱠﻮﻥ ) ِ (73ﻣﻦ ﺩ ِ ﺸ ِﺮ ُﻛ َ ﺛُ ﱠﻢ ﻗِﻴ َﻞ ﻟَ ُﻬ ْﻢ ﺃَ ْﻳ َﻦ َﻣﺎ ُﻛﻨﺘُ ْﻢ ﺗُ ْ
ﻳﻦ ) َ (74ﺫﻟِ ُﻜﻢ ﺑِ َﻤﺎ ُﻛﻨﺘُ ْﻢ ﷲُ ﺍ ْﻟ َﻜﺎﻓِ ِﺮ َ ﻀ ﱡﻞ ﱠ ﺷ ْﻴﺌﺎ ً َﻛ َﺬﻟِ َﻚ ﻳُ ِ ﻧَ ُﻜﻦ ﻧﱠ ْﺪﻋُﻮ ِﻣﻦ ﻗَ ْﺒ ُﻞ َ
ﻮﻥ ) (75ﺍﺩ ُْﺧﻠُﻮﺍ ﺃَ ْﺑ َﻮ َ
ﺍﺏ ﻖ َﻭﺑِ َﻤﺎ ُﻛﻨﺘُ ْﻢ ﺗَ ْﻤ َﺮ ُﺣ َ ﺽ ﺑِ َﻐ ْﻴ ِﺮ ﺍ ْﻟ َﺤ ﱢﻮﻥ ﻓِﻲ ْﺍﻷَ ْﺭ ِ ﺗَ ْﻔ َﺮ ُﺣ َ
ﻖ
ﷲِ َﺣ ﱞ ﺎﺻﺒِ ْﺮ ﺇِﻥﱠ َﻭ ْﻋ َﺪ ﱠ ﻳﻦ ) (76ﻓَ ْ ْﺲ َﻣ ْﺜ َﻮﻯ ﺍ ْﻟ ُﻤﺘَ َﻜﺒﱢ ِﺮ َ ﻳﻦ ﻓِﻴ َﻬﺎ ﻓَﺒِﺌ َ َﺟ َﻬﻨﱠ َﻢ َﺧﺎﻟِ ِﺪ َ
ﺳ ْﻠﻨَ ﺎﻮﻥ ) َ (77ﻭﻟَﻘَ ْﺪ ﺃَ ْﺭ َ ﺾ ﺍﻟﱠ ِﺬﻱ ﻧَ ِﻌ ُﺪ ُﻫ ْﻢ ﺃَ ْﻭ ﻧَﺘَ َﻮﻓﱠﻴَﻨﱠ َﻚ ﻓَﺈِﻟَ ْﻴﻨَﺎ ﻳُ ْﺮ َﺟ ُﻌ َ ﻓَﺈِ ﱠﻣﺎ ﻧُ ِﺮﻳَﻨﱠ َﻚ ﺑَ ْﻌ َ
ﺺ َﻋﻠَ ْﻴ َﻚ َﻭ َﻣﺎ ﺼ ْ ﺼﻨَﺎ َﻋﻠَ ْﻴ َﻚ َﻭ ِﻣ ْﻨ ُﻬﻢ ﱠﻣﻦ ﻟﱠ ْﻢ ﻧَ ْﻘ ُ ﺼ ْﺳﻼً ﱢﻣﻦ ﻗَ ْﺒﻠِ َﻚ ِﻣ ْﻨ ُﻬﻢ ﱠﻣﻦ ﻗَ َ ُﺭ ُ
ﺴ َﺮ ﻖ َﻭ َﺧ ِ ﻀ َﻲ ﺑِﺎ ْﻟ َﺤ ﱢﷲِ ﻗ ُ ِ ﷲِ ﻓَﺈ ِ َﺫﺍ َﺟﺎء ﺃَ ْﻣ ُﺮ ﱠ ﻮﻝ ﺃَﻥْ ﻳَﺄْﺗِ َﻲ ﺑِﺂﻳَ ٍﺔ ﺇِ ﱠﻻ ﺑِﺈ ِ ْﺫ ِﻥ ﱠ ﺳ ٍ ﺎﻥ ﻟِ َﺮ ُ َﻛ َ
ﻮﻥ )ﻏﺎﻓﺮ (78 -69 : ُﻫﻨَﺎﻟِ َﻚ ﺍ ْﻟ ُﻤ ْﺒ ِﻄﻠُ َ