• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Issue-
 Available Affordable Heath Care
Their Fame-
Our country has the best health care system in the world. Health caresystems run by the government are inefficient, of lower quality, and result in allocationof service by the government.
Our Frame
- It is our moral responsibility to assure basic health care to all. We muststrive to improve our heath care system to deliver the same average quality andeconomic efficiency as heath care systems in other developed countries. Our currentheath care system is the highest cost system worldwide yet is at best average in overallquality of service. This puts us at a competitive disadvantage. On a comparative basis,our system costs most and does least.
One Minute Statement:
Without your health you have nothing. What is more important than your health andyour family's health? If we believe the government's charge is to defend America,shouldn't that extend to defending Americans' health? The morality of this issue isclear. Everyone deserves basic care. Everyone deserves medicine when sick. To sayotherwise is inhumane and immoral.I believe in a health care system that:
Makes us economically competitive with other developed nations.
Our current lack of a national health care system has resulted in companies decidingto locate in other countries with defined medical system. Recently Toyota choseto build a new plant in Canada and not the U.S., primarily because of Canada's"national health insurance system, which saves auto manufacturers large sumsin benefit payments compared with their costs in the United States." Privatelyfunded insurance plans are a key factor in the high cost structure of many USmanufacturers.
Delivers medical care with the same cost/ benefit as enjoyed otherdeveloped countries.
Our current system is the highest cost medical system inthe world but it ranks well below others in such critical metrics as lifeexpectancy, infant mortality, doctors as a percentage of population, etc.
Fairly represents all of the stakeholders in the medical system.
The currentsystem reflects the interests of the insurance and the pharmaceutical companies,often to the detriment of the patient and the doctor. Our health care system mustreflect the interest of all stakeholders from both a moral and a financial perspective.
Recognizes the moral imperative that
 
everyone deserves basic care.
I believe that this imperative is based on the Golden Rule, a moral preceptcommon to all religions
 
Restructures the current method of allocating medical care.
While someargue that the current system is free of allocation, experience tells me otherwise.Under the current system millions are “priced out” of the medical system basedsolely on their economic situation. People see costs climbing, worry abouttheir own ability to pay in a crisis. Our health case system must address thisconcern.
Key Words:
Defend Americans' health, morality, economically competitive system, the GoldenRule, basic health care, fair representation, moral imperative, control costs
Elevator Statement:
Without your health you have nothing. What is more important than your health andyour family's health? If we believe the government's charge is to defend America,shouldn't that extend to defending Americans' health? The morality of this issue isclear. Everyone deserves basic care. Everyone deserves medicine when sick. To sayotherwise is inhumane and immoral.References:http://forum.rockridgeinstitute.org/?q=dialogue05/day8/healthcare
 
Concepts from the Web
"Without your health you have nothing." What is more important than your family's health? If we believe the government's charge is to defend America,shouldn't that extend to defending Americans' health?
In a post below, Jason Pitzl-Waters hits the nail on the head when he emphasizesthe moral dimension of the commitment to universal health care: "We need to beclear that the morality of this issue is not hazy. Everyone deserves basic care.Everyone deserves medicine when sick. To say otherwise is to reduce humanity tostatistics."
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies inthe final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are coldand are not clothed."--President Dwight D. Eisenhower 
Universal Health Care (UHC?) should have strong pull from many corners: upper middle incomes to lower incomes and, increasingly, corporations that employlarge numbers of workers. The pharmaceutical and medical industries wouldn'tsupport it, of course, but the car companies sure would, as should airlines, banks,etc.
 but public health by definition is about shared, common responsibility (andindirect benefits to individuals).
A weak area for the individual-is-center frame seems to me that it presumes thatall things are under your control
Paul Krugman of the New York Times had an interesting commentary this week about how Toyota chose to build a new plant in Canada and not the U.S., primarily because of Canada's "national health insurance system, which savesauto manufacturers large sums in benefit payments compared with their costs inthe United States."
As I was listening to the news on my way home from work, it heard a story abouthow the different of an auto worker in Germany and one in the US. A significantdifference is that every US made car had a Health-care Cost for current and pensioned workers of about $1200 that the German car didn't. I cannot remember the exact number; it may be +/- a few hundred. GM's health-care costs aregrowing at 10%/yr.
Other elements of making the case include areas of enlightened self interest: I'mless likely to get sick if others around me aren't sick; our economy is stronger if itinvests a little in preventive care (and early childhood education, ...) than inexpensive emergency room visits costing 100X as much, etc
Studies show roughly two-thirds of Americans believe it's a good idea toguarantee health care for all U.S. citizens, as Canada and Britain do.
I can only suggest being persistent in pushing the "nation as family" frame andnot letting the debate get into abstractions. Keep it concrete in the realm of familyand friend relations and the kind of moral reciprocity that operates in them. Eventhe Christians know about the Golden Rule of treating others as we would wish to be treated. By extension, the legitimacy of any government is based on its moral
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...