What Got Marlowe Killed? The Gospels as Roman Literary Satires

 
 
 
 
 

by JohnHud

Value This
Doc
Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 36 43
Words: 12811 13640
Characters: 77458 81678
Lines: 166 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.05 5.99
Words per line: 77.17 21.89
Words per page: 355.86 317.21

Add to your reading list

Flag_red Flag this document

Document Information

786 Reads | 3 Comments

Description

Playwright and theology student Christopher Marlowe knew enough about classical literature to distinguish a true history from a literary satire. That is why he was writing a book "against the Trinity". It explained that Jesus was a "deceiver "in "vain and idle stories", and that "before Titus and Vespasian conquered" Jerusalem, Christianity was unknown. He was right. There was no historical Jesus. Marlowe knew that the Gospels are literary and not historical documents. He knew that they were a Roman creation "all of one man's making" , created at the instigation of Josephus at the court of the Flavian Caesars, as a ‘book of riddles’. The four gospels were part of the same literary endeavour that invented the history of a pacifist messiah set in the 30s CE, essentially as clever war propaganda to stabilize the Messianic factions in the Empire. Marlowe was going around giving this atheist lecture to senior courtiers ,and this made him dangerous, so he was conveniently killed in a Government 'safe house', in front of two witnesses, one from each branch of the secret service. Email Darkladyplayers@aol.com

This paper covers what Marlowe knew in detail, and was given in a shorter form to the Eastern Great Lakes Bible Society annual conference.

See on Scribd. Caesar's Messiah, Gospel of Matthew as a Parody of the Torah, and What Shakespeare Knew About Jesus.

Pdf_16x16 36 Pages


Date Added

06/14/2009

Category
Tags
Groups
Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

or use Facebook Connect

sebreathnach

A great thesis... waiting to be written. And the inclusion of references from Porpyry (whom few refer to) to Stauffer, etc., will greatly augment Joseph Atwill's alarming discoveries. My own view is that Francesco Carotta's work is , as an initial opener, the most effective way to introduce the most collosal question of our age -- a question whose consequences are at one with the entire notion of Christianity and the horrendous damages it has inflicted -- and continues to inflict -- upon the human psyche. Thereafter, of course, the headier wine of Atwill's claims come into focus and give rise to questions that are as yet unimaginable. Like: How did the entire history of the past 2,000 years allow such charlatans to get away with such inhuman behaviour??? In this context Marlowe, like Porpyry and Reuchlin, Annie Besant, Joseph McCabe, and hundreds of others revisit the modern reader with renewed energy. It is interesting, for example, to read Karl Kautsky anew, in the light of Atwill’s discoveries: especially his Foundations of Christianity. One can see that the only thing missing from his scientific analysis of Christianity is Atwill’s discoveries, without which he comes as close as can be to revealing that Christianity is a fabrication of unproveable hypotheses -- indeed, false and forged propositions -- which depend solely , entirely and absolutely upon the existence of a mythical character called Jesus of Nazareth. And now that the world knows that the entire Mediteranean Myth has been built upon a couple of Roman comics, how shall it react when it comes to realise what has happened. Again Marlowe is more than a clue to how the myth-makers will react to those who try to take away their world-wide power. Since the Englightenment, it is without doubt the greatest criminological issue of our time, even if it is swallowed up in oceans of horse-manure! Seamus Breathnach www.irish-criminology.com

06 / 24 / 2009