circumstances surrounding
the
9/11 terrorist attacks"
as per
yourcharter?"If the
NIST
comesto the
conclusion
that thereis no
way
Building7could have fallen without human involvement other than
the
attacks on the towers, and that a law enforcement agency oragencies should investigate because
of the
implication,
at the
veryleast, of
arson,
and your
work
is "finished," from the point of
view
ofhistoric importance your report willberelegatedto the"better government"
file,
of note only as an example of theweakness of government commissions.The Warren Commission had the charter of determining who did the
deed,
butduckedit. Ifyour commission
does
notinclude anythingon the potential arsonists, how can your report be complete?
I
have
been
impressed
by
Kristen Breitweiser,
who
speaks
for the
NewJersey widowsof9/11, whomIhave seenontelevision.Her
comment
on theCommission'swork that appeared in a Washington Postarticle last month, after meeting with "several commission leaders"
was
"We've
had it. It is
such
a
slap
in the
face
of the
families
of
the victims. They are dishonoring the dead with theirirresponsible behavior." I tend to take her seriously.Another widow,Mrs.Ellen
Mariani,
filed suit against the President
and
others in November for acts committed in "covering up" events
of
9/11.
I have the sinking feeling that
Mrs.
Breitweiser's disgust at theconflict of interest of your executive director, Mr. Zelikow, isbecause she
knows
more than I do about the line of communicationthrough
him to
Condoleeza
Rice
and the
ungodly assemblage currentlybefouling the White House.Mrs. Mariani
is
calling
for an
independent investigation
of
9/11.I had thought that wasyou.No?Yours truly,Encl.
Leave a Comment