David A. RosenbergJune 17, 2009
Chief Economist & Strategist Economics Commentarydrosenberg@gluskinsheff.com+ 1 416 681 8919
Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.
Gluskin Sheff + Associates Inc.is one of Canada’s pre-eminent wealth management firms. Founded in 1984and focused primarily on high net worth private clients, we are dedicated to meeting the needs of our clients by delivering strong, risk-adjusted returns together with the highestlevel of personalized client service. For more information or to subscribe to Gluskin Sheff economic reports
,
visit www.gluskinsheff.com
MARKET MUSINGS & DATA DECIPHERING
Breakfast with Dave
GREEN SHOOTS TURNING BROWNISH
Well, we can forget about calling for an end to the recession. Three of theingredients are still contracting:1.
Industrial production is still contracting — down 1.1% in May and thiscame on top of a downwardly revised -0.7% print in April (was -0.5%).This was the SEVENTH decline in a row and left the level of production atan 11-year low (July 1998, believe it or not). Even outside of the autoindustry (-7.9%), output was still down 0.7% last month and it is now verydifficult to discern any improvement at all since the credit collapsestarted to subside in March. Every major industry posted a decline in May— so much for the ISM (then again, it is only a diffusion index). Oh yes, itis early days yet but we do have the NY Empire index and it fell back to-9.41 in June from -4.55 in May — and this is a proxy for tech spending.It’s a sign that we could see a setback for ISM this time around — thoughwe will await the Philly Fed survey before making any definitive statement.2.
Employment fell in May — indeed, the 345k slide in May was worse than the depths posted in each of the last two recessions. Strange way for arecession to end. As for jobless claims, it is not enough that they havefallen from their near-depression highs — they have to break well below500k before payrolls stop declining, and only then will it be safe to call for the end of the recession.3.
Real organic personal income — one of the key ingredients (sorry, but theECRI, which was predicting an ongoing boom in July 2007, doesn’t go into the NBER definition). Never mind ‘real’, in nominal terms, average weeklyearnings fell 0.2% in May for the second time in the last three months. Yes, yes, the housing start number was a good number, especially the single-family result (+7.5% to 401k units at an annual rate — the third increase in arow); as well as the 7.9% MoM bounce in single-family permits. Still, it is difficult to really say anything except that perhaps the single-family sector has foundbottom — after all, natural demographic demand for single-family homes iscloser to 500k than 400k, the level at which starts are still hovering around.The report also lost part of its luster from the previously released NAHB index,which slipped back to 15 in June after two months of gains.When multi-unit construction is added in, what we see is that total housing starts came in at 532k at an annual rate, which by today’s standards mayqualify for a ‘green shoot’, but in reality was the third worst rally ever in the 50-year history of the data series. Still, lumber futures managed to buck the overalldown trend in commodity prices and closed at a nine-month high, and thehomebuilding stocks outperformed.
IN THIS ISSUE
• With industrial productionstill contracting,employment falling andnominal wagescontracting, we can forgetabout calling an end to the recession• Demand for newly-issuedcorporate paper has beenextremely strong; makehay while the sun shines• Could the Dow Transportsbe signaling a sell signal?• Consumer spending onbasic TV servicesexpected to rise; all partof the cocooning wavecoming our way in thefrugal future• But for overall spending,frugality is a killer — justask Best Buy• Is booming money supplyreally inflationary? Notwhen we are in a liquidity trap
Leave a Comment