• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
 
GAO
United States Government Accountability Office
Report to Congressional Committees
TROUBLED ASSETRELIEF PROGRAM June 2009 Status of Efforts to AddressTransparency and Accountability Issues
June 2009GAO-09-658
 
What GAO Found
United States Government Accountability Office
Why GAO Did This Study
H
ighlights
Accountability Integrity Reliability
June 2009
 
TROUBLED ASSET RELIEF PROGRAM
June 2009
S
tatu
s
of Effort
s
to Addre
ss
Tran
s
parencyand Accountability I
ss
ue
s
 
Highlights ofGAO-09-658, a report tocongressional committees
 As of June 12, 2009, Treasury had disbursed $330 billion of the roughly $700billion in TARP funds (see table below). Most of the funds ($200 billion) wentto purchase preferred shares and subordinated debentures of 623 financialinstitutions under the Capital Purchase Program (CPP), which continues to beOFS’s primary vehicle for stabilizing financial markets. At the same time thatTreasury continues to purchase preferred shares in institutions, others have paid about $1.9 billion to repurchase shares and Treasury announced that itexpects to receive approximately $68 billion from CPP repurchases later in June 2009. Unlike the capital purchase process, Treasury, in conjunction with primary federal regulators, has yet to share criteria used to evaluaterepurchase requests. Treasury also has provided only limited informationabout the actual warrant repurchase process resulting in questions aboutwhether it is getting the best price for taxpayers.
S
tatu
s
of TARP Fund
s
a
s
of June 12, 2009
Dollars in billions
Pro
g
ram
 
Trea
s
ury’
s
currentprojected u
s
e offund
s
a
Di
s
bur
s
ed
Capital Purchase Program $218.0 $199.5Targeted Investment Program 40.0 40.0Capital Assistance Program TBD
b
TBDSystemically Significant Failing Institutions 70.0 41.2Asset Guarantee Program 12.5 0.0Automotive Industry Financing Program 82.6 49.2Making Home Affordable 50.0 0.0Consumer and Business Lending Initiative
c
70.0 0.1Public Private Investment Program 100.0 0.0
Total
s
$643.1
 
$330.0
Source: Treasury OFS, unaudited.
a
Amounts represent Treasury’s most recent projected funding level. Portions of Treasury’s projecteduse of funds are not yet legal obligations.
b
Treasury has announced the Capital Assistance Program but has not yet projected its funding level.
c
The Consumer and Business Lending Initiative now includes the Term Asset-Backed Securities LoanFacility and the Small Business and Community Lending Initiative.
Treasury continued to operationalize its more recent programs, including theCapital Assistance Program (CAP). As part of this program, the FederalReserve led the stress tests of the largest 19 U.S. bank holding companies,which revealed that about half needed to raise additional capital to keep themstrongly capitalized and lending even if economic conditions worsen.Whether any of the institutions will have to participate in CAP has yet to bedetermined. While the Federal Reserve disclosed the stress test results, it hasno plans to disclose information about the 19 institutions going forward. Whatinformation, if any, is disclosed will be left to the discretion of the affectedinstitutions raising a number of concerns including potentially inconsistent oronly selected information being disclosed. Moreover, the Federal Reserve hadnot developed a mechanism to share information with OFS about the ongoing
GAO’s fifth report on the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)follows up on priorrecommendations. It also reviews(1) activities that had been initiatedor completed under TARP as of  June 12, 2009; (2) the Departmentof the Treasury’s Office of Financial Stability’s (OFS) hiringefforts and use of contractors; and(3) TARP performance indicators.To do this, GAO reviewed signedagreements and other relevantdocumentation and met withofficials from OFS, contractors,and financial regulators.
What GAO Recommend
s
 GAO makes 5 recommendations,including that Treasury improvedisclosure of the warrantrepurchase process, fullyimplement a communicationstrategy that ensures that all keycongressional stakeholders arekept up to date about TARP, and inconsultation with the primaryfederal regulators, ensureconsideration of generallyconsistent criteria to evaluaterepurchase requests. GAO alsorecommends that the FederalReserve consider providing certainaggregate information related tothe stress tests to the public andOFS in particular.Treasury described the steps it hastaken since our March report. TheFederal Reserve said that GAO’srecommendation was operationallydifficult and the informationreported would be potentiallymisleading. GAO continues to see value in reporting aggregate trendinformation.
View GAO-09-658 or key components.For more information, contact ThomasMcCool at (202) 512-2642 ormccoolt@gao.gov.
 
United States Government Accountability Office
 
Hi
g
hli
g
ht
s
of GAO-09-658 (continued)
condition of the 19 bank holding companies thatcontinue to participate in TARP programs.GAO again notes the difficulty of measuring the effectof TARP’s activities. As shown in the table below, someindicators suggest general improvements in variousmarkets since our March 2009 report, although the costof credit has risen in some cases. Specifically, the Baacorporate bond rate and LIBOR have declined butmortgage and Aaa bond rates have risen. However, perceptions of risk in credit markets (as measured by premiums over Treasury securities) have decreased ininterbank, mortgage, and corporate bond markets,while total mortgage originations have increased.Empirical analysis of the interbank market, whichshowed signs of significant stress in 2008, suggests thatthe CPP and programs outside of the TARP announcedin October of 2008 resulted in a statistically significantimprovement in risk spreads even when otherimportant factors were considered. In addition,although Federal Reserve survey data suggest thatlending standards remained tight, collectively thelargest CPP recipients extended roughly $260 billion onaverage each month in new loans to consumers andbusinesses in the first quarter of 2009, according to theTreasury’s loan survey. However, attributing any of these changes directly to TARP continues to be problematic because of the range of actions that havebeen and are being taken to address the current crisis.While these indicators may be suggestive of TARP’songoing impact, no single indicator or set of indicatorscan provide a definitive determination of the program’simpact. According to Treasury, its Financial Stability Plan has provided a basis for its communication strategy.Treasury plans to more regularly communicate withcongressional committees of jurisdiction about TARP.However, until this strategy is fully implemented, allcongressional stakeholders will not be receivinginformation in a consistent or timely manner. A keycomponent of the communication strategy is the new
Web site. While a goal of the new site is to provide the public with a more userfriendly format, Treasury has not yet measured the public’s satisfaction with the site.OFS has made progress in establishing its managementinfrastructure. Continued attention to hiring remainsimportant because some offices within OFS, includingthe Office of the Chief Risk and Compliance Officer,continue to have a number of vacancies that will needto be filled as TARP programs are fully implemented.Treasury has also continued to build a network of contractors and financial agents to support TARPadministration and operations. These contracts andagreements are key tools OFS has used to help developand administer its TARP programs. Treasury has provided information to the public on procurementcontracts and financial agency agreements, but has notincluded a breakdown of cost data by each entity. As aresult, Treasury is missing an opportunity to provideadditional transparency about TARP operations.
S
elect Credit Market Indicator
s
 Credit market rate
s
and
s
pread
s
 Indicator De
s
criptionBa
s
i
s
point chan
g
e
s
ince GAOMarch 2009 reportBa
s
i
s
point chan
g
e
s
inceOctober 13, 2008
LIBOR3-month London interbank offered rate,LIBOR (an average of interest rates offereddollar-denominated loans) Down 38 Down 388TED SpreadSpread between 3-month LIBOR and 3-month Treasury yield Down 57 Down 407Aaa bond rate Rate on highest quality corporate bonds Up 22 Down 62Aaa bond spreadSpread between Aaa bond rate and 10-yearTreasury yield Down 101 Down 61Baa bond rateRate on corporate bonds subject tomoderate credit riskDown 84 Down 108Baa bond spreadSpread between Baa bond rate and 10-yearTreasury yield Down 207 Down 107Mortgage rates 30-year conforming loans rate Up 61 Down 87Mortgage spreadSpread between 30-year conforming loansrate and 10-year Treasury yieldDown 53 Down 74
Quarterly mort
g
a
g
e volume and default
s
 Indicator De
s
cription Chan
g
e from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009 (late
s
t available data)
Mortgage originations New mortgage loans Up $185 billion to $445 billionForeclosure rate Percentage of homes in foreclosure Up 55 basis points to 3.85 percent
Source: GAO analysis of data from Global Insight, Thomson Datastream, and
Inside Mortgage Finance 
.
 
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...