Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
01
The Long Road To ConveRsion:
The digiTaL PuRChase FunneL
By Andrew Martin, Microsoft’s Atlas Institute
itrct
Most marketers are amiliar with the concept o the “purchase unnel,” – and manyonline marketers plan and execute their campaigns with it in mind. They buy somesites or their ability to generate awareness and reach new customers, and others ortheir ability to persuade consumers to take action and make a purchase. For example,the messaging needed to draw a customer to your site rom a search engine is vastlydierent rom the messaging intended to build top-o-mind awareness on a portal.So knowing when and where consumers are exposed to advertising is invaluable toany media plan attempting to leverage each consumers place in the unnel.Today, the reality is that media channels overlap and multiple sites reach consumersprior to conversion
1
. Yet, the advertising metrics and models developed or onlinemarketers largely ignore the question o when media exposure occurs. By measuringthe last ad seen or clicked by a converter, they ocus entirely on a brie time span atthe bottom o the unnel. Evaluating only a single point o advertising contact over-simplies the delivery and perormance o any media channel.
This Digital Marketing Insight aims to answer the question of exactly when andwhere purchasers see online advertising, and what implications those discoveriesmay have on the process of planning and optimizing media.
1
Strong, Esco. Combined Impact o Search and Display, 2006.
Microsoft’s Atlas Institute
 
02
Mtly & dt
The data or this DMI comes rom over seventeen million conversions that occurredbetween May and September o 2008. These conversions represent the results o advertising campaigns run by 250 advertisers across thousands o sites. Each advertisertracked both search and display campaigns simultaneously, and only conversions romrevenue-producing (such as sales, lead, or registration)action tags were used. The study considered a ull 90 dayso advertising history prior to each conversion.
M Cmpt or Tm
Most advertisers made their rst contact with convertersmonths prior to the conversion. Figure 1 shows the mediannumber o media touch points at dierent times inusers’ conversion histories. Unsurprisingly, the amounto advertising exposure is quite high in the last ew daysbeore a conversion. Consumers amass a median o 5.5ad events in the nal 48 hours beore conversion alone.But this requency amounts to less than a third o the totalmedia events delivered over three months. Hal o the totalengagements with converters occurred between seven andsixty days prior to conversion, and ater a ull 90-day lookback, converters experienced a median o 18.5 events.The large number o ad exposures consumed prior topurchase may come as a surprise to marketers who areused to discussions o requency that revolve around siteor campaign metrics. Measuring only the last ad in aconversion history conceals the true length o the rela-tionship an advertiser has with each consumer. When we ocus our view on individualconverters’ histories and apply the unnel concept to their ad consumption, we discoverthat their histories are much longer and richer than typically assumed. These resultsconrm other research showing that advertising reaches consumers rom multipleadvertising campaigns and across channels
2
.
T Prc Fl
With such a large number o ads being delivered beore conversion, it’s common thatmost converters are reached by an advertiser across multiple sites. Figure 2 lays out themedian time that dierent categories o publishers reach consumers prior to conver-sion. Notably, aliate networks and search engines oten reach customers or the rsttime just a ew days or hours prior to conversion. But categories like Entertainmentand News tend to reach in-market consumers weeks or months beore conversion, anddeliver their requency over a longer period o time. The reason why these sites reachconsumers at such dierent times becomes clearer when we consider where they might
9060302114721
   D  a  y  s   B  e   f  o  r  e   C  o  n  v  e  r  s   i  o  n
Median Total Ad Events byTotal Days of History
0 5 10
Median Touchpoints
15 20
2.25.58.410.712.313.816.718.5
 
Figure 1:Over half of advertisingexposure occurredmore than a weekprior to conversion.
2
Fowler, Jed. The Impact o Overlap, 2006.
 
03logically reach a consumer who is traveling throughthe sales unnel.The interplay between three actors appears toinfuence when a publisher is likely to reach aconverter: site unction, audience, and advertisermix. Search engines are an interesting example o this phenomena. The inormation gathering andnavigational unctions o search draw an audienceo consumers with a high probability o makinga purchase
3
. Consequently, search has attracteda number o direct response and lead generatingadvertisers pushing messages designed to getconsumers to “act now.”Social media, on the other hand, oten reachesconsumers much earlier. Users o social media visitthose sites in order to connect and share experienceswith riends and amily over the web. Most o theunctionality provided by these sites does not leaddirectly to a commercial transaction. Rather,advertisers nd these publishers valuable or theirreach to a broader audience and ability to buildawareness. As a result, social media sites tend tolive high in their advertisers’ purchase unnels. 
implct Fr Cmp Mrmt
When a site reaches a user prior to conversion, it has serious implications or how wemeasure and plan online campaigns. This is especially true when it comes to measuringcampaign ROI using the last-ad standard. Over hal o the views or clicks that arecredited by the last-ad methodology occur within ve days or less rom the time o conversion, even though only a raction o the total ad consumption by convertersoccurs during this period. But more importantly, as Figure 2 shows, only a ew sitecategories dominate the lower reaches o the purchase unnel. Assigning credit to thelast click or view disproportionally avors those ew publishers at the expense o thepublishing majority, whose contributions are spread out over more time.Other common industry practices can urther obscure the contributions a publishermade to a sale. Advertisers whose action tags use shorter view or click windows arealso devaluing many publishers, since publishers that appear in the nal week prior toconversion are oten dierent rom those appearing three or our weeks prior. Thesesites are bought or dierent reasons than the publishers urther down the unnel, suchas to generate awareness or reach a particular audience. Publishers higher in the unnelare valuable sources o new prospects that are used to eed trac to lower-unnel
Photo
   M  e   d   i  a  n   D  a  y  s   B  e   f  o  r  e   C  o  n  v  e  r  s   i  o  n  s
3528211470
City GuideAutoAffiliateGamesKidsAd NetworkPortalNewsLifestyleSocialSportsTechnologyEntertainmentFood/WineMusicReal EstateSearch EnginesTelecomFinanceTravelJobsISPShopping VideoWeatherEmailDirectory
Median Ad Delivery Time by Site Category
3
Brooks, Nico. Paying or Navigational Search, 2007.
Figure 2:Most publishers livein the middle andupper funnel.
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • Notes
    Load more