Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Juan Carlos Gomez, A041 591 459 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)

Juan Carlos Gomez, A041 591 459 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 214|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case for further proceedings after finding the immigration judge denied the respondent’s derivative citizenship claim without making sufficient factual findings or evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, including a delayed birth certificate listing a U.S. citizen as the respondent’s father. The decision was written by Member Patricia Cole.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case for further proceedings after finding the immigration judge denied the respondent’s derivative citizenship claim without making sufficient factual findings or evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, including a delayed birth certificate listing a U.S. citizen as the respondent’s father. The decision was written by Member Patricia Cole.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Sep 06, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/12/2013

pdf

text

original

 
GOMEZ, JUAN CARLOS83179-004/A04159159FEDERAL DETENTION CENTERP

BOX 5010OAKDALE LA 1463Name: GOEZ JUAN CARLOS
US pm  Ju
Executive Oce r Immgration Reiew
d Iigi ppsOc  h Ck
5107 leesburg Pike, St 2000Fas Chuch Vgina ./
FEDERAL DET. CENEROAKDALE 2P.O. Box 1128 OAKDALE LA 1463A041591-459Date of this notice302013
closed s a copy of he Board's decso ad order  he aboe-reereced case.cosure
 Mb  A
Scerely,
D
c

Do CarrCh CerkLl
  Dk
Cite as: Juan Carlos Gomez, A041 591 459 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
 
 Dm

c
Execuive Oce r Immaton ReewDeson of he Board ofmmaon AppealsFas
C
Vigna

Fie:A041 59 459 -Oakdale, LAIn re JAN CROS GOMEZ
RMOVAL PROCDGSAPPEALON BEHAL O RESPODET:Pro seON BEHALF OF S:CAGE:Scot  BeapAssisan Chief CounselDate Notice Sec237(a)(2)(A)(iii),

Ac[8 U.SC§ 227(a)(2)(A)(iii)] Convicted of aggravaed feonyAPPLCAION: eination
U
3 0

The responden, a natie and ciizen of he Doinican Republic, has appeaed o aImmigration Jdge's April 2, 203 decision denying his moion o erminate he reoalproceedings nding him reoable as charged ad ordering hi removed to the DominicanRepblic The Deparment of Hoeland Securiy ("DHS) has led a response in opposition ohe respondents appeal The record will be reandedThe responden was admitted o he Unied Ses a  imigran on January 3 988. OnSepeber 8 200 he was convicted of possession with inten o distribue heroin in iolaion of 2 USC §§ 84(a)() (b)()(c), ad (b)()(I). The responden oed to einae heproceedings, arging hat he deried Unied Saes ciizenship hough his bioogical her pursuant to he Child Ciizenship Ac he igraion Jdge denied he respondens otionconcluding ha he respondent ied o show ha he is a Unied Saes citizen pursua tosecion 320 of the igration and Naionaiy c 8 US.C§143 (a) (xh8).On appeal, he responden argues ha he has presened a egiimae delayed birh ceicaeshowing tat his biologica ter is Carlos George Reyes Almone and hat heees he oher requireens of secion 320 of te c Secion 320(a) of he Ac proides in perinen par haa chid bo ouside of the United Staes auoaticaly becomes a ciizen of he Unied Saeswhen al of e owing condiions hae been lled:) t leas one parent of the chid is a ciizen of the United Saes, wheher by bih or nauraizaion.(2) The chid is under he ae of eiheen years(3) he chid is residing in te Unied Saes in the egal and physica cutody of he ciizenparen pursuan o a lawl adission r peaen residence.
Cite as: Juan Carlos Gomez, A041 591 459 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
 
A041 591 459e Immigration udge un that the recod contains three versons of the espondent's brh cercate dated 984 2002 and 2011 (IJ Apr 2 2013 Denia of Moton to Tenate at 3)The st wo bth certcats st Maxo Nestor Gomez-Rodriguez as the respondents theThe thd h certcate whch was ssued almost 30 years aer the respondent was bo listsClos oge Caen Reyes-Amonte as his ther (Exhs 6, 7 at Atacents A B and C)eImmgation udge stated that the espondent shres the sae ast nae asMaximo esto Gomez-Rodriez and that a deayed ir certcate does not oe concsvepoo of patetyThs she und that n the absence of more concusve proo that Cros orge Caen ReyesAonte is hs ther the respondent has not et hs burden to show at he is a Unted States ctzenWe have hed that a delayed brt cecate even when nrebuted y conadctory evidencewll not n eve case establsh a peson's staus  a Unted States ctzen
Matter ofBueno-Almone
2 I&N Dec 1029 103 (BIA 1997);
Mater of Sea,
16
I&N
Dec 643 (BIA1978) Speccay each case mst be decded on ts own facts wth regard to the sucency of theevdence We nd tat he Immiation udge made lega conclusions withot scent cua ndings d dd not explctly evauate the sucency of a of the evdence n parcuar the iation Jdge dd not address a swo adavt n the recod o CrosGeorge Reyeslonte which states that he is the bologca ther of Jan Carlos Goez (Exh6). No dd she state what cts sppor he decson to reject the thrd deayed rth cecate asnvad
In vew o or lted ctnding auto we wil reand the ecod r he ct nding and  the ssuance o a new decson addressng a evdence eevt to teespondents clai o dervatve citzenshp 8 CFR § 1003(d)()(v) We expess noopnon on whethe the deayed rh cecate s athentc or on the isse of patety genealyWe note that the respondent es the brden of proofAccordngy the owng orde s enteedOR: he ecod s eanded  fthe proceedngs consstent wth e egong opinion and r the eny o a new decson
·
2
Cite as: Juan Carlos Gomez, A041 591 459 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->