Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Unexplaied Mysteries

Unexplaied Mysteries

|Views: 781|Likes:
Published by alcodark

More info:

Published by: alcodark on Jun 20, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





The sacred geometry of planet Earth
Posted on Sunday, 9 November, 2008|5:38| Comments: 3
William B Stoecker: The idea that certaingeometric shapes possess some kind of power is very old, asis the idea that certain locations on the Earth are sacred or magical.
The elites often apply sacred geometry to architecture;America's capital was built in large part with this in mind, andthe most recent additions have included the WashingtonMonument, an obelisk built by the Freemasons, and thePentagon, commissioned by Freemason Franklin DelanoRoosevelt. But, over the years, a number of researchers andwriters have suggested that our entire planet contains a magical geometry which governs thelocation of sacred sites, and that this geometry may be hyper dimensional, and even that theentire universe was constructed in accordance with the laws of hyper dimensional geometry. Atthe same time, there is a very ancient belief that all of space is filled with an inexhaustible energy,spiritual in origin, called variously chi, ki, prana, kundalini, vril, odic force, or orgone, and that thisenergy may serve as a dynamic luminiferous aether, and may be the foundation of all other matter and energy. It has been suggested that this energy flows most strongly along certain pathson the Earth's surface, usually called ley lines.Many years ago, Ivan T. Sanderson suggested that our planet may be attempting to become acrystal. The force of gravity, of course, holds the planet in a roughly spherical shape, butSanderson suggested that some other force was trying to turn Earth into an enormous crystal,and that certain locations on our planet, regularly spaced, are prone to mysterious vanishings of ships and aircraft, and other paranormal phenomena. Researchers like Carl Munck described aglobal grid linking ancient sacred sites, and Hugh Harleston Jr. claimed that the ancient ruin of Teotihuacan in Mexico, with its Pyramid of the Sun and Pyramid of the Moon was built accordingto tetrahedral geometry, and he suspected that the entire universe was constructed according totetrahedral geometry.A tetrahedron is one of the five Platonic solids, and it is a three dimensional space bounded byfour triangular sides. In a regular tetrahedron the triangles are equilateral, and all of their anglesare sixty degrees each. A hexahedron has six sides; a regular hexahedron is a cube. Anoctahedron has eight sides, a dodecahedron has twelve, and an icosahedron has twenty. Thetetrahedron and icosahedron are most germane to this discussion. Buckminster Fuller based hisgeodesic domes on icosahedrons, which have triangular sides; in a regular icosahedron, as in aregular tetrahedron, the sides are all equilateral triangles.Bruce Cathie, a former airline pilot from New Zealand, developed some of these ideas into anoverall theory. He suggested that the Earth somehow contains or is trying to become a regular icosahedron, and that ancient sacred sites like Stonehenge and Teotihuacan are sited accordingto a "world grid" based on this. According to his theory major ley lines intersect at or near itsvertices, and he believed that ufos travel along the ley lines, which are separated from oneanother by thirty minutes of arc (one half a degree). Of course, this is counting even the minor leylines.In recent years, these ideas have been popularized and further developed by Richard Hoagland.Hoagland pointed out that if a regular tetrahedron of the right size existed witin a sphere like thespinning Earth, and one of its vertices were at the South Pole, the other three vertices would bespaced one hundred and twenty degrees apart some 19.47 degrees (an irrational number, likemost constants) north of the equator. He pointed out that major upwellings of energy seem tocluster within a degree or two of one of these locations, like the immense Hawaiian volcanoes onEarth, the Olympus Mons volcano (the highest and most massive mountain in the Solar System)the Great Red Spot on Jupiter, and the Dark Spot on Neptune. These may be north or south of the equator, depending on the planet.Hoagland also suggested that the current paradigm in physics, based on the twin pillars of 
relativity theory and quantum mechanics, may be in need of serious revision, and that physicsmay have been close to a grand unified theory with the original equations of James ClerkMaxwell, before Oliver Heaviside and others simplified and altered them. He believed that muchof the energy of the Sun and other stars came not from hydrogen fusion, but from a universalenergy from a higher, hypredimensional source, and that this energy also accounted for much of the internal heat of the planets. The energy in stars and planets (and, some of us have noticed,the intensity of their magnetic fields) seems to correlate at least roughly with their angular momentum. Of course, if all of this is true, it may be possible for us to tap this energy andperhaps also to achieve gravity control.Two mysterious hexagons surround the north pole of the planet Saturn; the main one is 15,000miles across and, per infrared photos, extends at least sixty miles down into the planet's interior. Itdoes not move with the wind driven clouds, but rotates every ten hours and thirty nine minutes, asdo Saturn's radio emissions. This is probably the period of axial rotation. Physicists andastronomers currently have no explanation for any of this.Hoagland suggested that two four dimensional interlocking hyper tetrahedrons projecting downinto three dimensional space could produce such a hexagon. We cannot visualize the fourthdimension, but, reasoning by analogy, we can at least partly understand it. A square is a twodimensional shape bounded by four straight lines, and its three dimensional equivalent is a cubebounded by six squares. So a four dimensional hyper cube would be bounded by six cubes. Anequilateral triangle is a two dimensional shape bounded by three straight lines. A tetrahedron is athree dimensional shape bounded by four triangles. So a hyper tetrahedron would be a four dimensional space bounded by five tetrahedrons.Long ago, a man named Ernst Chladni tried sprinkling sand on a flat metal plate and using soundto vibrate the plate. The sand grains would arrange themselves into geometric shapes, caused bystanding waves, and, the higher the frequency became, the more compex the shapes became.The study of this is called cymatics, and some have suggested that this might be the cause of Saturn's hexagon; perhaps this theory and Hoagland's are not mutually exclusive.Certainly, there is at least some evidence that something strange is going on along lines in theEarth, specifically earthquake faults and the rift zones that separate Earth's tectonic plates.Paranormal phenomena do seem to cluster at such locations, including earthquake lights.Most of the known early developments of human culture, including the first known civilizationsand the development of the major religions happened in or near these zones or (as in the case of Egypt) along earthquake faults parallel to the rifts. Clearly, this needs to be investigated, but wehave to remember that the known cultures were almost certainly not the first.A look at a map or globe of the Earth reveals some interesting oddities. Remember the trianglesforming the faces of tetrahedrons and icosahedrons? All but two of Earth's continents are at leastroughly triangular. Anyone can see that South America and Africa are roughly triangular. NorthAmerica is not as obvious, since its shape is interrupted by, among other things, the Floridapeninsula. Even Eurasia is at least very roughly triangular, with its shape marred by the Indiansubcontinent. In all of these, one apex is more or less to the south, and one side makes up thenorth of the continent. Another oddity: most of the largest peninsulas on Earth point roughlytoward the equator. The exceptions to the triangular continent pattern are Australia andAntarctica. Even if we include Tasmania and New Guinea as part of Australia (which, geologically,under very shallow water, they are) it is still not remotely triangular.But Antarctica, located around the South Pole, may not be the exception it seems. Earth has noSaturn-style hexagon, perhaps because the Earth has a solid crust and mantle, but bothAntarctica and the Arctic Ocean are roughly circular, which is at least fairly close to hexagonal.And the strangeness does not end there. The Arctic Ocean covers 5,400,000 square miles, andAntarctica is only a tiny bit larger, just over 5,400,000 square miles. The greatest depth in theArctic Ocean is 18,000 feet and the highest point in Antarctica, the Vinson Massif, is only 2,000feet off at 16,050 feet above sea level. But we don't want to make too much of all this, since
Earth's tectonic plates are not triangular, and, anyway, the current arrangement and shape of thecontinents is only temporary; continental drift has changed it greatly over the aeons.But maybe there is something very special about the current age.William B Stoecker Article Copyright© William B Stoecker 
The disappearing bees
Posted on Wednesday, 12 November,2008|4:31|Comments: 12
Suzanne Hayes: Our bees are disappearing.
If you think that thissounds like a plotline from Doctor Who, then you would be right. But this is not science fiction,and it affects every single one of us. In ancient civilisations (Mayan, Egyptian, Greek), the beewas sacred and honey was considered to be the food of the gods.In mythological terms, the bee is said to bridge the natural world from the underworld, a carrier of souls - just as the bee returns to the hive, honest souls return to heaven, and the good and purebees transport new souls to be re-born into the world.The extent of the mysterious disappearance of our bees is difficult to ascertain as media,beekeepers associations and Government figures per country seem to issue contradictoryfigures, however, reports indicate that up to between 25 and 45% of the global population aregone!The term Colony Collapse Disorder(CCD) was coined in 2006 in the USA, it refers to thedisappearance of worker bees from honey bee colonies before the brood has reached adulthood.However, the disappearance is not limited to hives, as reports indicate that solitary bees aredisappearing in the same numbers due to cause/s unknown.The fact that bees do not die in the hive, makes it extremely difficult for investigators to determinecauses.It is known that honey bees forage at distances between 2 - 5 km from the hive, however,considering the numbers of missing bees, investigators cannot find anywhere near acorresponding number of bee corpses - the plot thickens!A number of universities and government agencies have formed a “CCD working group” to searchfor potential causes of the bee disappearance and then to formulate a working plan to mitigateCCD.
Consequences of Bee Decline
It has been estimated that the value of bees to the word economy is $ 180 billion!The bee is responsible for one out of three mouthfuls of food we eat.Decline will therefore significantly decrease food availability, driving food prices up.This is a huge problem - that will affect us all.The impact upon our already tenuous global economy cannot be underestimated.

Activity (12)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Jean Dumouchel liked this
Jean Dumouchel liked this
kyron liked this
debwatkins liked this
world2006 liked this
donneperth liked this
aymanfarahat liked this
gomezito liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->