Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
13Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
China Defense minister speech on USA extermination

China Defense minister speech on USA extermination

Ratings:

4.5

(2)
|Views: 1,679 |Likes:
Published by kabud
The speech from 2005 argues for the necessity of China using biological warfare to depopulate the United States and prepare it for a future massive Chinese colonization.

“The War Is Not Far from Us and Is the Midwife of the Chinese Century” was published on February 15, 2005 on www.peacehall.com and was published on www.boxun.com on April 23, 2005.

This speech and a related speech, “The War Is Approaching Us” are analyzed in The Epoch Times original article “The CCP’s Last-ditch Gamble: Biological and Nuclear War.”

http://en.epochtimes.com/news/5-8-8/31055.html
http://english.epochtimes.com/news/5-8-5/30974.html
http://english.epochtimes.com/news/5-8-5/30931.html
The speech from 2005 argues for the necessity of China using biological warfare to depopulate the United States and prepare it for a future massive Chinese colonization.

“The War Is Not Far from Us and Is the Midwife of the Chinese Century” was published on February 15, 2005 on www.peacehall.com and was published on www.boxun.com on April 23, 2005.

This speech and a related speech, “The War Is Approaching Us” are analyzed in The Epoch Times original article “The CCP’s Last-ditch Gamble: Biological and Nuclear War.”

http://en.epochtimes.com/news/5-8-8/31055.html
http://english.epochtimes.com/news/5-8-5/30974.html
http://english.epochtimes.com/news/5-8-5/30931.html

More info:

Published by: kabud on Jun 21, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/11/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Jeff Nyquist comments on the speech believed to have been given by Mr. ChiHaotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central MilitaryCommission.Transcript of a speech follows below.Jeff Nyquist comments::This commentary should be included as part of a chapter in a future book. Weshould call this chapter, “Authenticating China’s Strategy”You suggest (1) that the speech is a hoax. This is entirely possible, althoughclose analysis tends in another direction. Strategy is my subject and my life-longstudy. Believe it or not, it is possible in strategy to know certain thingsindirectly, by inference and analysis. After careful consideration, with regard tothe speeches attributed to General Chi, I think it is unwise to say “we don’tknow” and “it doesn’t matter.” In fact, it’s not impossible to analyze a documentto determine its authenticity. Here is a task entirely within the reach of astrategic analyst. Furthermore, if the document is authentic then it matters agreat deal; for the enemy’s intentions are laid bare, with countless implications(and potential war-winning insights).When we first encounter an unfamiliar text, we don’t know how to judge it. We arecompletely lost, and this is normal. Those who claim to understand something onfirst contact are deceiving themselves. Nothing worth knowing is understoodimmediately. When I first read the two speeches attributed to General Chi Haotianmy reaction was to dismiss them as you did. When I read the first paragraph of thesecond speech, I rolled my eyes and laughed at what seemed to be an obvious fraud.At first reading they were not credible. (This is the same reaction I had toGolitsyn in 1984).Two years elapsed and, as chance would have it, I was doing some research on MaoZedong’s strategic ideas. In this midst of this research I was stunned by Mao’sdetermination to build a fleet and invade North America. I was also struck by thebrutality and cynicism of his statements. I went back and started re-reading SunTzu and the commentaries on Sun Tzu. My mind suddenly drifted back to the twospeeches attributed to General Chi Haotian. On my second reading I realized thesespeeches are only incredible from a Western point of view. From a Chinesestrategist’s point of view, these speeches are consistent with 2,500 years ofChinese history and thought. There is nothing inauthentic in these two speeches.If they are a hoax, then a genius produced them. More than that, this aforesaidgenius possesses authentic tidbits of military intelligence that are not known bythe general public — but were revealed to me by a high-ranking Russian militarydefector with more than three years experience in China.Mao once said that the first Chin emperor was nothing compared with himself. Thefirst Chin emperor only killed a thousand Confucian scholars. Mao had killedhundreds of thousands of Confucian scholars. This was Mao’s boast. Such boastingis unknown to Western history, except to figures who are dismissed as madmen. Oneis reminded of the Chinese warlord whose father was taken prisoner and heldhostage by a rival. In this instance, the rival threatened to boil the old manalive. The war lord sent his reply: “Save me some of the soup.” One has to digthrough the Dark Ages of Western history to find anything like it. Or else it issomething from the history of Caligula or Nero or Eliagabulus, who were consideredevil madmen — dreadful failures and misfits. In China such behavior has long beennormalized. The Western ethic, which followed from the hero-worship of the ancientGreeks and Romans, places nobility as the true standard of greatness. Chinese
 
civilization places a high premium on realistic thinking, brutality and success.This is greatness in the Chinese context.How does this point argue the authenticity of the alleged speeches of General Chi?A person who disagrees with the strategic culture of China, favoring freedom andhumane government, doesn’t possess the mentality needed to reproduce such abrilliant piece of mimicry. One would have to be a student of Sun Tzu and the Chinemperor and Mao Zedong, not a student of Thomas Jefferson or Lincoln. Such astudent would not value freedom, having absorbed a philosophy entirely at oddswith Western culture. More than that, it is a culture that believes in the West’sweakness and inevitable fall.If you were going to advance a fraudulent speech by a Chinese communist leader,would you dare put into his mouth the statement that Nazi Germany was “too soft”?Would you dare open your first paragraph with the assertion that you are pleasedthat 80 percent of Chinese polled would kill women and children in a war? Anyonewith the sophistication to produce this document would have avoided going so far,fearing that the reader would laugh out loud at such an obvious propaganda fraud.Only a simple person would start Chi’s second speech with that kind of paragraph,and a simple person did not compose this speech! To make a credible fraud, youhave to downplay the wickedness of the Communists. You must be subtle in yourpresentation so that the fraud has a chance to sound credible. But the Chi speechis not subtle as a fraudulent presentation would have to be. Instead, it is deepand profound and brilliant in its totalitarian perspective. The compassion for theAmerican victims comes late in the second speech, long after the skeptics would’vestopped reading it.I do not know if the speech is genuine. But if I had to lay a bet, then I’d wageron its authenticity. That is to say, I suspect it is authentic. And the way totest its authenticity is to see if Chinese actions are consistent with itsprogram.There is something more, as well. I know from my discussions with a Russiandefector, that Russia and China agreed to split North America between them asfollows: Russia would get Alaska and parts of Canada, while China would get thelower 48 states (which contains the best land). The agreement on this was affirmedby the Russian General Staff in early 1992. This joint agreement on a future waragainst America is the basis for the Sino-Russian alliance. And if you readGeneral Chi’s speech carefully, you will see that he brilliantly lays out thelogic of the Chinese offensive and their means of advancing. He does not mentionRussia’s role because Party cadres don’t need to know about Russia’s militarycontribution. They only need the most general strategic outline and why the war isnecessary.You must read this speech several times in order to understand its profoundscience. If this speech is counterfeit, the counterfeiter spent many yearsdevising it. In fact, a hoax of this type could only be produced, as I notedbefore by a genuis. If General Chi was not the author, then the author should be ageneral — and ought to have General Chi’s job.In point (2) you mention 9/11. Chi’s speech explains why a false flag terrorattack is necessary in advance of a biological offensive against the UnitedStates. As would be proper, General Chi gives nothing away. He merely implies thatthe Americans will not know who is really attacking them. This is intrinsic to hisspeech, even though he doesn’t say a word.In point (3) you ask if this is good propaganda material against communism. Sinceour goal is to understand the enemy, the propaganda value is of secondary
 
importance. If these speeches are authentic, our activism must counter the Chinesestrategy. Furthermore, authentic information has the tendency of winning minds inthe long run.And yes, we are at war. At this stage in the war, however, weapons of massdestruction are not being used because the attackers are waiting for the rightmoment. The fact of the shopping mall regime indicates what we are given to workwith.*************************************************War Is Not Far from Us and Is the Midwife of the Chinese CenturyLeading CCP official argues for exterminating U.S. populationBy Chi HaotianAug 08, 2005The following is a transcript of a speech believed to have been given by Mr. ChiHaotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central MilitaryCommission. Independently verifying the authorship of the speech is not possible.It is worth reading because it is believed to set out the CCP’s strategy for thedevelopment of China.The speech argues for the necessity of China using biological warfare todepopulate the United States and prepare it for a future massive Chinesecolonization. “The War Is Not Far from Us and Is the Midwife of the ChineseCentury” was published on February 15, 2005 on www.peacehall.com and was publishedon www.boxun.com on April 23, 2005.This speech and a related speech, “The War Is Approaching Us” are analyzed in TheEpoch Times original article “The CCP’s Last-ditch Gamble: Biological and NuclearWar.”************************************************Text of the speech:Comrades,I’m very excited today, because the large-scale online survey sina.com that wasdone for us showed that our next generation is quite promising and our Party’scause will be carried on. In answering the question, “Will you shoot at women,children and prisoners of war,” more than 80 percent of the respondents answeredin the affirmative, exceeding by far our expectations [1].Today I’d like to focus on why we asked sina.com to conduct this online surveyamong our people. My speech today is a sequel to my speech last time [2], duringwhich I started with a discussion of the issue of the three islands [3], mentionedthat 20 years of the idyllic theme of “peace and development” had come to an end,and concluded that modernization under the saber is the only option for China’snext phase. I also mentioned we have a vital stake overseas. Today, I’ll speakmore specifically on these two issues.The central issue of this survey appears to be whether one should shoot at women,

Activity (13)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
sonysony liked this
kabud liked this
kabud liked this
kabud liked this
kabud liked this
leomarka liked this
Luu Nguyen liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->